Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Thirteen Scariest People in America

Old Trout Magazine. Posted October 30, 2006.


From the scariest presidential candidate to the scariest billionaire to the scariest cop, these truly are the worst America has to offer.
Advertisement

The Thirteen Worst People in America:

Scariest Presidential Candidate: Sam Brownback / Senator (R-Kansas)

by Mary Reinholz

Once a moderate in the Bob Dole mold, Sen. Sam Brownback has morphed into a zealous man of God intent on protecting millions of fetuses from what he calls the yearly "holocaust" of abortion. Brownback actually considers fetuses to be full-blown American citizens.

Just another religious nut stalking the corridors of power? Well, yes, but this ambitious pol is the favored 2008 presidential candidate of the radical right. Brownback seems hell-bent on establishing not just faith-based initiatives, but "faith in politics" -- i.e., an authoritarian Christian theocracy.

The man speaks softly but pushes the Passion of the Christ in the culture wars, blasting gay marriage, porn, stem cell re-search and, most recently, assisted suicide. One of Brown-back's glorious moments came when he proposed introducing a bill in the Senate that would compel pregnant women considering abortions to provide anesthetics for their fetuses.

But no matter how over the top his political posturing, no one seems to be laughing at Brownback's bid to succeed Bush -- certainly not the influential Bible-thumpers supporting him like Pat Robertson and Chuck Colson. Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pennsylvania) sponsored Brownback's conversion to Roman Catholicism in 2002, and he was later baptized in a chapel run by the secretive lay society Opus Dei.

On the economic front, the pious Senator perceived no moral quandary in accepting $42,000 from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Along the way, Brownback apparently has had access to the deep pockets of his wife, the former Mary Stauffer, whose family used to own a media conglomerate.

Brownback's 1995 bout with potentially fatal cancer intensified his right-to-life ardor, but his religious beliefs didn't stop him from living, until recently, in a $600-a-month apartment in a $1.1 million Capitol Hill townhouse owned by members of Congress and subsidized by a secretive religious organization, known variously as The Fellowship and The Foundation and registered with the IRS as a church. Brownback is a regular member of one of the group's "prayer cells."

Perhaps he prays for the Supreme Court to display the Ten Commandments since the courts, believes Brownback, have overstretched "separation of church and state" to mean "removal of church from state."

Scariest Judge: Edith Hollan Jones / Chief Justice of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

by Paul Drexel

Imagine you're a woman working at a company where male colleagues send you X-rated notes, hit on you, and repeatedly grab your breasts -- even once pinch your butt with pliers. To Judge Edith Jones, such depravity does not constitute grounds for a sexual harassment case, though she conceded the facts. During arguments in the case the woman brought against her employers (Waltman v. International Paper), Jones purportedly commented that the behavior of the man who had pinched the woman's breasts wasn't so objectionable since he later apologized. And, added the judge, at least she hadn't been raped.

Such an injudicious temperament would be chilling in any courtroom, but that it belongs to an Appeals Court Chief Justice -- and a woman who has been on Dubya's shortlist for Supreme Court vacancies -- ought to send up a red flag visible even to the color-blind. It once did, when Bush The Elder bypassed Jones after critics successfully labeled her "too extreme" for Supreme Court consideration and instead turned to David Souter. While it's autre temps under Bush Junior, he seems to have kept Daddy's old list; after Christian fundamentalists scuttled the nomination of Harriet Miers, Jones could surface as the next Court nominee -- especially if the President feels pressure to name a woman. But to cast Jones -- who graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 1974, and received her first appointment to the federal bench (by Ronald Reagan) in 1985 -- as a more qualified Miers doesn't do her justice; Judge Jones is no less a federalist than Clarence Thomas.

Like Thomas, Jones likes to refer to the 18th century for guidance in her judicial opinions. In a speech she gave to Harvard Law School's branch of the right-wing Federalist Society, Jones neatly summed up her backward-looking legal philosophy. "The first 100 years of American lawyers were trained on Blackstone, who wrote that 'the law of nature, dictated by God himself, is binding in all counties and at all times; no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this' ... The Framers created a government of limited power with this understanding of the rule of law -- that it was dependent on transcendent religious obligation."

Conservatives and corporations alike have a friend in Judge Jones. She champions states' rights (except when it comes to Roe v. Wade). She sees the field of employment discrimination litigation as ripe for abuse by plaintiffs. She disdains criminal defendants and complains that the "over-constitution-alization" of criminal-case procedures tilts the system away from punishing the guilty in favor of applying "fairness" to alleged lawbreakers.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: scaife, brownback

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Who is the Scariest of them All?
Posted by: edith on Oct 30, 2006 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rick Warren? My impression of him from media has been one of a 'moderate' evangelical who even has signed on to pro-environment letters with liberal clergy. I think his feel good book was used by the hostage in Florida who talked her captor into surrender, the captor having just killed a judge or some lawyers in a nearby courthouse.

I don't find Warren personally scary because I don't believe in that hocus pocus "feel good" Christianity.(Fresh-faced Sunday morning TV evangelism. Where DO they get those white teeth from?). But the idea of tens of millions spouting these slogans is scary. The decline of critical thinking in this country's schools and thus businesses and public life is a threat to reasoned democracy; guys like this take over individuals' responsibility to think for themselves.

Several others on the list like Sciafe and the Nazi professor have been exposed before and they wear their hate on their sleeve. so I don't worry about them as much as the genial Warren. Billy Graham looks better and better everyday in comparison to his power-mad successors(including his son Franklin who could have been on this list).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

coconuts
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 30, 2006 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder America is in such dire straights these days with all these weird coconuts propagating propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Left Out Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Left Out Posted by: davidbdr
» Masks Posted by: edith
» RE: Masks Posted by: willymack
» RE: Left Out Posted by: NWCrow
» RE: Left Out Posted by: Jayzer
ooh! SCARY! Better vote Democrat!
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red on Oct 30, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and when the dems get in power, the GOP tells their base " Ohh....SCARY Better vote GOP!"

and so the overclass dance continues....

hey, what if the dems put together a plan to tax the rich use that revenue to pay for universal healthcare? Naw, why would rich dems and their rich backers want that? Only the people want that....better to just scare the voters into voting democrat

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is the scary preface to Professor MacDonald's scary book
Posted by: JillHenry on Oct 30, 2006 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a scary link to the scary preface to Professor MacDonald's scary book: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements

Scary link to scary preface

Scary excerpt from preface:
"Culture of Critique describes how Jewish intellectuals initiated and advanced a number of important intellectual and political movements during the 20th century. I argue that these movements are attempts to alter Western societies in a manner that would neutralize or end anti-Semitism and enhance the prospects for Jewish group continuity either in an overt or in a semi-cryptic manner. Several of these Jewish movements (e.g., the shift in immigration policy favoring non-European peoples) have attempted to weaken the power of their perceived competitors — the European peoples who early in the 20th century had assumed a dominant position not only in their traditional homelands in Europe, but also in the United States, Canada, and Australia. At a theoretical level, these movements are viewed as the outcome of conflicts of interest between Jews and non-Jews in the construction of culture and in various public policy issues. Ultimately, these movements are viewed as the expression of a group evolutionary strategy by Jews in their competition for social, political and cultural dominance with non-Jews...."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are we talking Pastrami, edith? Posted by: LeftWright
» Good Night Loon Posted by: edith
» RE: Good Night Loon Posted by: rwa
Homicide Bomber
Posted by: elfrijole1 on Oct 30, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny how the term "homicide bomber" started at Fox News, and now is showing up in liberal articles. Did anyone else catch that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homicide Bomber Posted by: scott balogh
» Let's bring back GLOBALONEY! Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
The Repukes already have a book
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 30, 2006 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is called something like "the Top 100 Trying to Destroy America" or some similar b.s. It includes every liberal Democrat you could name.

Is that enough for you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Repukes already have a book Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
No slot for Cheney or Lieberman?
Posted by: rwa on Oct 30, 2006 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thursday, December 13, 2001 San Jose Mercury News
Lynne Cheney-Joe Lieberman Group Puts Out a Blacklist

An aggressive attack on freedom has been launched upon America's college campuses. Its perpetrators seek the elimination of ideas and activities that place Sept. 11 in historical context, or critique the so-called war on terrorism.
The offensive, spearheaded by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a Washington-based group, threatens free speech, democratic debate and the integrity of higher education. In an incendiary report, ``Defending Civilization: How Our Universities Are Failing America,'' the American Council claims that ``colleges and university faculty have been the weak link in America's response'' to Sept. 11. It also asserts that ``when a nation's intellectuals are unwilling to defend its civilization, they give comfort to its adversaries.''

The report documents 117 campus incidents as ``evidence'' of anti-Americanism. More than 40 professors are named, including the president of Wesleyan University, who suggested in an open letter that ``disparities and injustices'' in American society and the world can lead to hatred and violence.

Other examples abound. A Yale professor is criticized for saying, ``It is from the desperate, angry and bereaved that these suicide pilots came.'' A professor emeritus from the University of Oregon is listed for recommending that ``we need to understand the reasons behind the terrifying hatred directed against the U.S. and find ways to act that will not foment more hatred for generations to come.''

Dozens more comments, taken out of context and culled from secondary sources, are presented as examples of an unpatriotic academy.

The American Council of Trustees and Alumni was founded in 1995 by Lynne Cheney, the vice president's wife, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman. Its Website claims that it contributed $3.4 billion to colleges and universities last year, making it ``the largest private source of support for higher education.'' Cheney is cited several times in the report, and is reportedly a close associate of its authors, Jerry Martin and Anne Neal.

Although the council's stated objectives include the protection of academic freedom, the report resembles a blacklist. In a chilling use of doublespeak, it affirms the right of professors to speak out, yet condemns those who have attempted to give context to Sept. 11, encourage critical thinking, or share knowledge about other cultures. Faculty are accused of being ``short on patriotism'' for attempting to give students the analytical tools they need to become informed citizens.

Many of those blacklisted are top scholars in their fields, and it appears that the report represents a kind of academic terrorism designed to strike fear into other academics by making examples of respected professors.

The report might also function to extend control over sites of democratic debate -- our universities -- where freedom of expression is not only permitted but encouraged.

At my campus, symposiums, teach-ins and lectures about religion, terrorism, central Asia, the Middle East and U.S. foreign policy have been organized recently. A teach-in entitled ``Background for Understanding'' drew hundreds of students, faculty and citizens from many political and intellectual perspectives. The audience had the opportunity to ask questions and comment freely. The discussion was lively and at times contentious.

As a microcosm of society, the university is a place where people of different ethnicities, religions, generations, and class backgrounds exchange ideas and opinions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No slot for Cheney or Lieberman?-2
Posted by: rwa on Oct 30, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The vigorous and often heated debates typical of such encounters are a hallmark of democratic processes. On most campuses this can still be done freely, but official accusations of anti-Americanism might intimidate and silence some voices.

That is not patriotism, but fascism. The American Council's position is inaccurate and irresponsible. Critique, debate, and exchange -- not blind consensus or self-censorship -- have characterized America since its inception.

Our universities are not failing America. On the contrary, they are among the few institutions offering alternatives to canned mainstream media reports.

The targeting of scholars who participate in civic debates might signal the emergence of a new McCarthyism directed at the academy. Before it escalates into a full-blown witch hunt in the name of ``defending civilization,'' faculty, students and citizens should speak out against these acts of academic terrorism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I knew it!
Posted by: drmeow on Oct 30, 2006 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"From the scariest presidential candidate to the scariest billionaire to the scariest cop, these truly are the worst America has to offer."
As soon as I read this, I knew our oh-so-lovely Joe Arpaio was going to be the scariest cop - but I was really hoping I was wrong. I just wish more of my fellow Arizonans recognized what a menace he is and would vote him out but I'm not holding my breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I knew it! Posted by: Topaz
consider me scared
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 30, 2006 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent last night watching horror movies and now I read your article and I think it is even scarier!! Thanks for the warning about these idiots. The sheriff in Arizona gets my vote as the scariest. Someone needs to put a stop to that lunatic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

its the System ...
Posted by: wleming on Oct 30, 2006 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the characters listed are part of a system called
corporate capitalism.. which encourages their depradations and rewards the worst while punishing the victim.
Like Dr. Phil-encouraging the victim to "own your problems and step to the plate"--the evil people listed are not at the heart
of the matter-. They are the products of a culture of deceit for profit. Glass half full or half empty? Its who "owns" the glass -that makes the difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congress, CFR, UN, Trilaterial Commission, Bank Cartel, Federal Reserve
Posted by: mite on Oct 30, 2006 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the shaker's and mover's, these individuals you mention are only puppets; this includes Bush and Cheney.
The Media is the propaganda machine for these individuals.
The U.S. citizen's are the cattle, and are watching their country disappear. I am more scared about the lazinest and cowardness of this nation and its people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the neo-cons?
Posted by: rwa on Oct 30, 2006 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard Scaife is as close as they get to the power that runs U.S. policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rev. Rick Warren - Scariest Proselytizer?
Posted by: maenfraemer on Oct 30, 2006 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL. Alternet really IS the home of the loony left!

So Pastor Rick is scary - why? Because he likes Hawaiian shirts and doesn't wear socks? You intolerant bigots who hate people of faith are a bunch of hypocrites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Meglomaniac Posted by: lessbread
HENRY KISSINGER
Posted by: fg on Oct 30, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kissinger, our own Dr. Strangelove, should be on the list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HENRY KISSINGER Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
» RE: HENRY KISSINGER Posted by: jdylarid
Purpose Driven Methlab
Posted by: Takeit on Oct 30, 2006 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, that chick shared her meth with the guy, and I guess that got his tweeking down.
So hostage crisis over, he got his fix.
I wouldn't call these people scary, or even relevant, to pretend your helpless is exactly what they want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Count Floyd
Posted by: opeluboy on Oct 30, 2006 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's scary?!?

Sorry, none of those people would make my list. But here's some who would, due to the fact they are blindly racing toward the end of the fucking world and dragging our helpless asses along with them:

George Bush, psychopath, mass murderer

Ehud Olmert, supremacist, war criminal

John Hagee (Christians United for Israel) lover of supremacist war criminals

Pat Robertson, maniac

Jerry Falwell, drooling maniac

Benjamin Netanyahu, supremacist, wanna-be war criminal

Dick Cheney, vampire

Rush Limbaugh, American hero

Ann Coulter, subconscious of 50% of America

Al Franken, Faux liberal poseur, full-time Zionist

Every Republican and Democrat in the House and Senate (with a few notable exceptions) who facilitate Israel's intransigence, wink at genocide, fund it and are willing to bring Armageddon to fruition rather than upset a whopping 2% of the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you, Count Floyd Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
Scarier People Than Warren
Posted by: keenekarl on Oct 30, 2006 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A gross misunderstanding of Christianity is the only thing that can truly account for labeling Rick Warren as scary.

Rick's desire to see as many people as possible become Christian is because he, like many Christians, believes that accepting Christ as Savior means receiving eternal life v.s receiving eternal damnation.

The desire to see people acquire eternal life is unselfish and good.

Unlike most right-wingers, Rick Warren does not believe that Christianity can or should be spread by political means.

His view of an "army of foot-soldiers" is only a term referring to his desire to see a large number of people organized and devoted to sharing the message of God's love with others.

Unlike many right-wingers, Rick Warren realizes that making laws to force people to behave a certain way is not the answer. He wants the change to come from the inside - a change of heart that only God can make.

No, you were way off when you picked on Rick Warren to fear-monger about Christians! You likely alienated alot of good progressive Christians. People should be much more worried about people like John Hagee. (See this earlier Alternet article: http://www.alternet.org/story/39748/).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scarier People Than Warren Posted by: keenekarl
» Just Asking Posted by: edith
» RE: Just Asking Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Just Asking Posted by: keenekarl
» RE: Just Asking Posted by: edith
And a few more runners-up...
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 30, 2006 9:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as long as lists are being made. After the election, the purpose of list making might be more sinister.

Oprah Winfrey - scary culture vulture
Nancy Pelosi - scary taste in plastic surgeons
Charles and David Koch - scary uberwealth
George Soros - scary uberclass conscience
Jim Gibbons - scary watched-Casino-too-many-times
John Mark Karr - scary x-factor
Howard Dean - scary on stage
Riley P. Bechtel - scary conservative-bully-in-a-liberal-playground
Rob Walton - scary carbon-copy-of-scary-parent
Joe Lieberman - scary political schizophrenia

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lots of corporations here, big surprise.
Posted by: hannah on Oct 31, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out the DVD Corporations. They are run by psychos and are operated like giant maniacs. Ahhh, capitalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People the gov't should be scared of...
Posted by: Reader11722 on Oct 31, 2006 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scariest Professor... 21-year tenured BYU physics professor Steven Jones who was fired for proving that explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC towers.

Scariest Author... E.A Blayre III whose book "America Deceived" was pulled from Amazon and Wikipedia (who admitted a conspiracy) America Deceived (book)

Scariest Congress.... 435 members who follow Dr. Ron Paul

Scariest Money ... Gold and Silver.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scary ? World feels scared of America's ignorance
Posted by: Burtonger on Nov 1, 2006 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The world's opinion is America is the biggest threat to peace,so it's the sheer insanity of all of America that is really really scary.
At least 50% of america is so ignorant they'll believe almost anything if it's repeated enough,that is very scary.Never mind all the so called leaders willingness to manipulate for personal gain,with a total lack of consideration for the repercussions on the entire world.
Fanatical greedy bully maniacs with nukes and an ignorant/uninformed population is the most scary thing to the whole world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here We Come Posted by: edith
Warren Scary?
Posted by: harleydjg on Nov 2, 2006 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who has met Rick Warren would not say that he is scary or even planning to take over the world. His "Billion Christian Foot Soldiers" are church attending people who are willing to pay their own way to help people in need. The biggest push at this point is to help in AIDs ravaged African nations. To feed the hungry, to care for the sick, to educate the next generation - how could anyone possibly be against these initiatives? Helping people in need is a good thing regardless of whether your motivation comes from a liberal or a conservative view of our world. What if both liberals and conservatives, Christians and Atheists and everyone in between joined in helping people in need? One thing for sure, Rick Warren will not turn away any help in meeting the needs of the poor and hungry who are homeless and without any kind of healthcare system, regardless of your beliefs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Warren Scary? Posted by: FrankPrincipe
rather than name call why don't you debate?
Posted by: chomsky on Nov 15, 2006 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read mcdonald's work. can't say i agree with everything but it's difficult to ignore the mountain of research he cites. In fact many "pro semitic' authors and academics have said what he said (umbrella of jewish groups pushed through the 1965 immigration 'reform' act) but they just said it in the positive.
You don't like it when those on the right make call you unamerican or 'you hate our freedoms'. Fair enough. Stop listening to scare mongers like the SPLC which often outright lies (as they are about mcdonald), and lets have a conversation about the facts without shouting at each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]