Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Arnold Schwarzenegger Fails the Manliness Test

By David Morris, AlterNet. Posted October 26, 2006.


When it comes to standing up to Bush and other conservative bullies, Ah-nold is a girly-man.
Advertisement

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience", Martin Luther King said, "but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." By this measure, Arnold Schwarzenegger fails the test. He flexes his impressive muscles for show. But when strength and courage truly are required, he cuts and runs. In his own inimitable words, he is a girly-man.

Back in June the governor stood up to the federal government for 17 days, refusing to send the California National Guard to the border in a dispute with the President over immigration policy. He finally agreed, but insisted, "I'm the commander-in-chief -- so I can take back the National Guard at any time that I want."

In this case, where little was at stake except perhaps for the liberal votes he was seeking as his gubernatorial re-election campaign began in earnest, Schwarzenegger stood tall. California law trumps federal actions.

Fast forward four months. Schwarzenegger vetoes a bill allowing the cultivation of industrial hemp in California. The bill was approved by over 60 percent of the members of both state legislative chambers. Hemp industry sales in the U.S. now exceed $270 million a year. Legislators decided that a policy that allows Americans to buy products they cannot make is absurd.

Why did the governor veto AB 1147? Because "... it would be improper to approve a measure that directly conflicts with current federal statutes and court decisions", he insisted. "This only serves to cause confusion and reduce public confidence in our government system." In this case, to Schwarzenegger, federal law trumps state law.

The defining moment of Governor Schwarzenegger's manliness may be his stance regarding another form of the cannabis sativa plant, medical marijuana. Here we are truly talking about a matter of life and death. As everyone probably knows, in 1996, California voters approved a ballot initiative that decriminalized medical marijuana. Those wracked with pain or terminally ill could use the drug, even though the feds continued to view any marijuana use as illegal.

In 2002, a unanimous California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Compassionate Use Act. It ruled the law a "wholly" state affair. As Schwarzenegger was gearing up to run for office, the 9th Circuit Court in 2004 upheld the lower court. The Bush Administration's top Justice Department lawyer on the issue, Mark Quinlivan, speaking to the American Bar Association annual convention, compared the plaintiff's states rights arguments to legal arguments made in the past by southern segregationists.

Taylor Carey, special assistant state attorney general in California under Governor Gray Davis responded that the Constitutional Bill of Rights trumps both state and federal law. "When the (federal) government acted to protect the civil liberties of the children of Alabama, they acted with the highest degree of moral force. When they act to prevent critically ill people from obtaining medication, they are not acting with the same degree of moral propriety."

A January 2004, Field poll found that 75 percent of California voters -- cutting across political, religious and generational spectrums -- believed the 1996 medical marijuana proposition should be enforced by the state.

In June 2005 the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the lower court's decision in a 6-3 ruling. However, state laws remain unchanged.

The federal government continues to send agents into California to arrest the terminally ill and interrupt their access to a drug deemed legal by the people of California. When it comes to medical marijuana, Schwarzenegger walks small. When it comes to medical marijuana, Schwarzenegger doesn't talk about California sovereignty or the will of the people. He doesn't call himself Commander-in-Chief.

He meekly stands aside and allows federal agents to invade California and arrest our weakest and most defenseless. Indeed, last year several California groups filed suit against the governor to stop state troopers from violating state law and arresting those with doctor's prescriptions who have marijuana.

Schwarzenegger's body remains well sculpted. He may be physically strong. But his character is weak. When you refuse to come to the aid of the weakest among us, you fail the Martin Luther King test of manliness.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: schwarzenegger, california

David Morris is co-founder and vice president of the Institute for Local Self Reliance in Minneapolis, Minnnesota and director of its New Rules project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Pat Kittle
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Oct 26, 2006 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Courage??"

With literally billions (with a "b") of people wanting to move here, and greedy and powerful interests ranging from Wall Street to Mexican gangsters to the pedophile-infested Catholic clergy demanding open borders, it obviously takes more courage to resist the relentless intimidation than it does to cave in to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pat Kittle Posted by: farhada
STAND UP DONATE TO ALTERNET
Posted by: larry278 on Oct 26, 2006 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO I'M NOT A TROLL. IN PLACE OF MY USUAL SCREED ABOUT ARNOLD, MACHO, SEXISM, I JUST SENT A SMALL DONATION TO ALTERNET. If you like & appreciate what you read on AlterNet, send them a donation. It takes money, lots of money, to produce this site & keep up [sexist macho pun intended] AlterNet. Your donation will empower AlertNet to continue to bring us the truth.
Look at your donation as a subscription. If you subscribe to NY TIMES, look at the price of a subscription for Times Select.
If you are a limosine liberal, look at the price you pay for WALL ST JL or FINANCIAL TIMES on line.
If I've caused you to feel guilty about not making a small donation to AlterNet, good- they need the money NOW or sooner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arnold's sexism reinforced
Posted by: godsbedamned on Oct 26, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my reading, it seems that the author of this piece views masculinity the same way that King did, as the embodiment of disciplined strength. But, I'm unclear whether he also accepts Schwartzenegger's view that that strong masculinity is the opposite of "girliness." Or, put another way, that femininity is the opposite of strength and character. If so, that kind of sucks, doesn't it? Plenty of women demonstrate those characteristics everyday, demonstrating that there's no rational basis in defining gendered traits (masculinity and femininity) in oppositional types of ways. I think this piece would be more critical and analytical (and also less reproductive of the bias that progressives want, or should want, to counter) with that sort of discussion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arnie, Ken Lay, the California Energy 'Crisis', Water Privatization, & Bechtel giveaways
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 27, 2006 12:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arnold is a tool, plain and simple. When he was 'elected' with 30% of the vote in a manufactured referendum, his first order of business was to dismiss the $8-$10 billion dollar lawsuits against Enron, Duke Energy, Reliant, and the rest of the Texas mafia energy companies that had been gaming California's energy market with the full assistance of Bush's federal government.

The whole thing has been documented in detail, but California's corporate media is among the worst in the nation - conglomerated and controlled by external interests to a historically unheard-of degree. They play right along with Schwarzenegger's photo ops and blatant lies - it's worse than the national media, believe me. Our slimy newspapers like the San Francisco Chronicle and the Los Angeles Times are owned by the same people who've been in bed with Arnold since day one.

Read what Greg Palast has to say about the issue; he covered it in detail when it was going on:

http://www.gregpalast.com/bush-energy-plan-california-reamin (May 1, 2001)

"You nasty-minded readers probably believe George Bush’s Energy Plan is just some pee-brained scheme to pay off the Presidents oil company buddies, fry the planet, and smother Mother earth in coal ash, petroleum pollutants and nuclear waste. If that’s what you think, you’ve overlooked the really vicious intent of the whole program....

Keep in mind that the entire excuse for this polluters’ wet-dream of an ‘energy plan’ is that there’s an energy ‘crisis’ in California. We’re told there’s just not enough electricity and gas. Even the Democrats and the New York Times agree there’s an energy crisis in California — which is evidence enough to conclude: There is no energy crisis in California."


Now he has his massive bond programs - disgusting corporate giveaways to George P. Schultz's Bechtel and every other Bush-friendly firm in the country. He's presiding over yet another series of slush fund giveaways in the name of 'rebuilding infrastructure' while he continues to gut California's education system.

His appointees to the UC Regents are also the ones who are linking up with Bechtel, BWXT Technologies (nuclear warhead manufactures), Battelle Memorial (the 'nonprofit' biowarfare specialists behind the 9/18 and 10/9 anthrax attacks) and Washington Group (think mini-Carlyle Group) in order to turn Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos into round-the-clock manufacturers of nuclear weapons. They've got a 500,000 biowarfare facility planned for Tracy California, where politically connected pharma companies will reap even more billions in taxpayer dollars through the agency of "Project Bioshield".

Then you've got Bechtel, Camp Dresser Mckee, Warbug Pincus and the like trying to pull a Bolivian water privatization scheme in California. Their method appears to be setting up about ten energy-hog desalination plants all across the state, which will be owned by the companies. Expect your water bills to go through the roof. Unlike in Bolivia, people in California don't seem to have a clue as to what is going on. At least half the population is plugged into the TV and drooling constantly - what a nightmare.

The corporate media won't talk about any of this - dead silence. They'll gleefully report on how Arnold called Democratic politicians "girly men" but that's about it. Arnold probably doesn't even know why he does what he does; George P. Schultz probably just winds him up and sets him off - just like programming a robot. His political handlers coordinate with the media and claim he's 'an environmentalist' while he's busy opposing the most promising renewable energy initiative in a long while: Prop 87, the "Make Big Oil pay for Clean Energy" Initiative.

How bad can it get?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big men
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Oct 27, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It takes a big (wo)man to drive a small car, not to mention the Murphy's law about the size of the car being in direct opposition to**** that women tee-hee about. Anyone see the many Hummers that Ah-nold so carelessly drives about in?
Anyone hear Ah-nold saying anything that would denote a triple digit IQ? Another Bushling, fixing the elections, squandering precious resources, accruing billions (with a b for those who get confused, i.e. Pat Kittle) in payoffs from big corp, it gets tiring. And yes I too get po'd at girly-man being a put down. More men should be so-called girly-men if the attributes are compassion, gentleness, kindness and tolerance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]