Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Desperate GOP Stoops to Lowest Fear Politics Imaginable

By Robert Parry, Consortium News. Posted October 23, 2006.


Republicans are ignoring U.S. intelligence in desperate political attack ads as they face huge losses in Congress in the fall elections.
102206front

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Parry

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The Republican National Committee has released a new campaign ad to rally the GOP base and other voters by showing threatening quotes from al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden followed by the pitch: "These are the stakes. Vote Nov. 7." (Watch the ad here)

President George W. Bush has flogged the same theme in lashing Democrats who favor a military withdrawal from Iraq.

"If we were to follow the Democrats' prescriptions and withdraw from Iraq, we would be fulfilling Osama bin Laden's highest aspirations," Bush said at an Oct. 19 campaign speech in La Plume, Pennsylvania. "We should at least be able to agree that the path to victory is not to do precisely what the terrorists want."

But these appeals from the RNC and Bush ignore U.S. intelligence information indicating that what al-Qaeda really wants is for the United States to remain bogged down in Iraq so the terrorist band can use the American occupation to recruit and train a new generation of jihadists, who can then be deployed against targets outside Iraq.

In effect, Bush and bin Laden share a common goal in Iraq. They both want U.S. forces to "stay the course."

Recently disclosed internal al-Qaeda communiqués make clear that bin Laden's terrorist band is counting on a long-term U.S. occupation of Iraq to build its movement.

In a letter, dated Dec. 11, 2005, a senior al-Qaeda operative known as "Atiyah" lectured the then-leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, on the necessity of taking a long view and building ties with elements of the Sunni-led Iraqi insurgency who have little in common with al-Qaeda except hatred of the Americans.

Atiyah told Zarqawi that "the most important thing is that the jihad continues with steadfastness and firm rooting, and that it grows in terms of supporters, strength, clarity of justification, and visible proof each day. Indeed, prolonging the war is in our interest." [Emphasis added.]

The "Atiyah letter" -- like a previously intercepted message attributed to al-Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman Zawahiri -- suggests that a U.S. military pullout in 2005 or earlier would have been disastrous for al-Qaeda's militants in Iraq, which are estimated at only about 5 to 10 percent of the anti-U.S. fighters.

Without the U.S. military presence to serve as a rallying cry and a unifying force, the al-Qaeda contingent faced disintegration from desertions and attacks from Iraqi insurgents who resented the wanton bloodshed committed by Zarqawi's non-Iraqi terrorists.

The "Zawahiri letter," which was dated July 9, 2005, said a rapid American military withdrawal could have caused the foreign jihadists, who had flocked to Iraq to battle the Americans, to simply give up the fight and go home.

"The mujahaddin must not have their mission end with the expulsion of the Americans from Iraq, and then lay down their weapons, and silence the fighting zeal," said the "Zawahiri letter," according to a text released by the U.S. Director of National Intelligence.

The "Atiyah letter," which was discovered by U.S. authorities at the time of Zarqawi's death on June 7, 2006, and was translated by the U.S. military's Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, also stressed the vulnerability of al-Qaeda's position in Iraq and the need to buy time.

"Know that we, like all mujahaddin, are still weak," Atiyah told Zarqawi. "We have not yet reached a level of stability. We have no alternative but to not squander any element of the foundations of strength or any helper or supporter."

Into al-Qaeda's hands

So, by extending the U.S. occupation of Iraq -- rather than looking for an early exit -- Bush has played into al-Qaeda's hands. Indeed, looking back over Bush's almost six years in office, his actions -- or some might say his blunders -- have repeatedly benefited bin Laden's strategies.

Not only did Bush fail to react to U.S. intelligence warnings about the 9/11 attacks, he then failed to finish off bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders in the battle of Tora Bora in December 2001.

Then, with al-Qaeda needing a respite, Bush shifted American focus to attack the secular government of Iraq, one of al-Qaeda's regional enemies. That bought time for al-Qaeda to regroup, recover and reorganize.

But the biggest boon for al-Qaeda was Bush's invasion of Iraq in March 2003, which served as a major recruiting tool for Islamic radicals. The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, written in April 2006, confirmed this fact, calling the Iraq War the "cause celebre" that spread militancy throughout the Muslim world.

Bin Laden also reciprocated, providing a crucial political boost to Bush in the final days of Campaign 2004.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election06, gop, al qaeda

Robert Parry's new book is Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
scared
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 23, 2006 12:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies and other corrupt Republicans are using scare tactics because they are really scared that they will lose the Congress. Perhaps Bush is helping bin Laden because he has been brainwashed by bin Laden! Or brainwashed by Saudi big bucks! BOTH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» scared Posted by: derfb1
» RE: scared Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: scared Posted by: Lauren
» RE: scared Posted by: raisolav
» RE: scared Posted by: bikey
» RE: scared Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: scared Posted by: BlackMan
blood brothers
Posted by: edith on Oct 23, 2006 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there does seem to be a community of interest between W and OBL. The 9/11 and Iraq catastrophes until recently served to keep both in power and in the headlines. Iraq is now coming apart, but Bush seems to be the only one eager to stay. Except for course for OBL. Concidence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: blood brothers Posted by: symcokid
The cornered beast lashes out in panic...
Posted by: rockpicker on Oct 23, 2006 12:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Planting Garlic On A Cool October Sunday,
While Waiting for News Of The Collecting Armada

The click of hooves on concrete interrupts
my digging. Across Mill Street, a little whitetail,
her flag tentative in alarm, signals embarrassment
on noticing my form. It's nearly dark.
This light of a weekday's usually safe, she's
come to know. But these elbows and knees
that should not be here flailing put her off.

I straighten in fading daylight with my spade.
I take account of the small pile of carrots
I have dug and think of ships collecting
in the Gulf. Apple trees stand barren
at the north end of this garden. They bloomed
to beat the band last spring, then bore
almost nothing. Cowbirds came Labor Day

and picked their poor limbs bare.
I'm left here leaning on a spade
in failing light, wondering, when will the media
tell us of the camps built to incinerate
our dissenting bones? When will my neighbors,
who do not think it polite to talk politics,
see that white flag wagging in alarm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. - FDR 1933
Posted by: LeftWright on Oct 23, 2006 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seek the truth. Fear not where it leads you.

Speak the truth. Fear not those who doubt or ridicule you.

The truth shall set us free. Fear not this freedom.

Love is the only way forward.

We are all brothers and sisters on this big beautiful bue ball.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I hear you... Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Republican Truthiness
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 23, 2006 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They seem to believe that if they say the same thing enough it will eventually become true. The casual manner in which the lies pour forth is very strange - perhaps they have some notion of "Triumph of the Will" (the Nazi-era German propaganda film) ingrained in their heads.

They don't seem to worry that their latest lies contradict their earlier lies, and that must be because they believe that no media personality will ever call them on it.

For example: Joby Warrick in the Washington Post wrote a series of articles in the fall and winter of 2001 detailing the high-tech nature of the anthrax spore powder used in the attacks, and how it must have been the product of a 'state biowarfare program' - such as Iraq's. All the evidence pointed to a domestic source, however - the Ames strain was one used in the US Army 'biodefense' program, and USAMRIID researchers rapidly determined that it was a highly sophisticated bioweapon, as reported by Richard Preston in his book, Demon in the Freezer. Likely source? Battelle Memorial Institute of Columbus OH, the only manufacturer of the anthrax vaccine at the time and a long-time military biowarfare contractor - and who also tried to cover up the high-tech nature of the anthrax by steam-sterilizing it before they analyzed it (see the book).

Nevertheless, Joby Warrick entirely ignores his earlier reporting on the issue in his latest piece for the WP: FBI Is Casting A Wider Net in Anthrax Attacks
By Allan Lengel and Joby Warrick, Monday, September 25, 2006


There's no mention of a retraction of his earlier reporting - down the memory hole! FBI says it wasn't so, so it must not be so? Not one mention of the glaring contradiction to the 2001-2002 reporting! Call up the WP and ask them if they're going to print a retraction (if you dare).

At the time, the Republicans were happy to use the anthrax attacks as a fear prod to get support for an Iraq invasion. Recall Colin Powell's display of a tube of 'simulated anthrax' at the UN?

The point is, they could never get away with this kind of thing without the wholehearted support of significant elements of the US corporate media. There is a whole stable of prominent media personalities that Bush & Co. rely on to 'get their message out'.

If you read "Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq" by Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, (http://www.prwatch.org/books/wmd.html), you can find out exactly how they were used to sell the Iraq invasion to the US public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublican Truthiness..or untruthiness sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
The war in Iraq was never meant to be won
Posted by: JP2 on Oct 23, 2006 2:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This war is meant to be a quagmire. It is meant to prolong terror and violence and instability for decades, in order to justify the occupations, the funding, the grabbing of resources, the pressure on the western populations. This is not something new. It is exactly the way the American military apparatus operates.
So it's time to go over the blabbering about the incompetence of the Bush administration. Because Afghanistan (tripled production of Heroine, Talibans on the rise), Iraq (the hellhole), Katrina (the big forced-gentrification experiment) and 9/11 (the oh, you really caught us off-guard big pretext):all these failures were not caused by incompetence. When the democrats and liberals will wake up to this? It's all getting really old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Close your zipper... Posted by: ignition
» Right on! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: CREATIVE CHAOS Posted by: AlienSlave
America: Freedom to Facsism
Posted by: lively56 on Oct 23, 2006 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch this film and you will know what is going to happen in the next few years, and it doesn't look pretty at all. It's time for the American people to stand up and say enough is enough and we're not going to take it anymore. Civil disobedience is the only answer at this point. This is not a republican vs. democrat issue, it is about the american people being decieved since 1913, in believing that the federal income tax is legal. It was never ratified by the states. The federal reserve is not run by our gov't., it is run by private bankers. All the money that is collected from the federal income tax is spent on paying on the interest that the gov't. owes to the federal reserve. The federal reserve was created by the likes of J. P. Morgans, the Rockafellers and so on. I implore anyone who hasn't seen Aaron Russo's film, America: Freedom to Facsism, to watch it, because that's what it's all about. Mr. Russo could get only one Congressman to talk to him about it, and that was Rep. Ron Paul. The website is www.freedomtofacsism.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America: Freedom to Facsism Posted by: Iconoclast421
Where Are The Democrats?!
Posted by: Sparks56 on Oct 23, 2006 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is this story on Alternet instead of the DNC web-site? Why aren't the Dems pounding this point home day after day? (Kerry danced around it in '04 only to prove he's a lousy dancer.)
The story is absolutely right-on in stating that the invasion and continued occupation of Iraq has been a godsend, windfall, thank-you-allah blessing for Bin Laden and the jihaddist movement.
Where are the Democrats?!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where Are The Democrats?! Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: Where Are The Democrats?! Posted by: larry278
All a ploy
Posted by: lamar on Oct 23, 2006 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don'tcha know? This whole terrorism thing is just a ploy to influence our midterm elections? The terrorists don't actually hate our middle east policy, they hate Karl Rove and liberty fries. The terrorism in the world has all been a scripted plot to influence the US elections in 2006.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All a ploy Posted by: harris
» RE: All a ploy Posted by: lamar
Mutual Goals
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 23, 2006 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If we were to follow the Democrats' prescriptions and withdraw from Iraq, we would be fulfilling Osam bin Laden's highest aspirations"

Oh really? Would someone please explain to the First Fool that we already fulfilled his "highest aspirations" by invading Iraq in the first place! Do you remember in the days immediately following the 9/11/01 attacks? Do you remember how we had the good will of the entire planet showering down apon us? I sure do! And I can't forget that it was all squandered by the half-witted bastard sitting in the oval office.

So help me Mitch Miller, if the democrats blow this one, that means the end of everything. Can you inagine this hideous jack-ass with no re-election or mid-term to look forward to with a compliant and corrupt congress at his bidding to boot? It gives me thew dry heaves just thinking about it. As reckless and stupid as he's been these past six years, he was actually being politically expediant the whole time! Give him another two years and the game's up.

What worrried me the most was his calm assurance that the republicans were going to win on 7 November. If he didn't believe that, he wouldn't have said it because the results would have made him look foolish. Is there another theft in the works that they plan on attibuting to another 1948 type of fluke? Is that the reason for all of their Harry Truman references of late? Recent polls are showing 57% of the voters voting democratic with 37% voting republican. Back in '48 it was alot closer than that. Are ther arrogant enough to think that they can pull it off? The answer is yes.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well Put Posted by: citizenjoe
Get used to this War
Posted by: Rathan47 on Oct 23, 2006 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think that a change in Congress is going to change the course of the War in Iraq, think again. Bush and Company went to war without Congressional approval in the first place, or did you forget?

No folks, this is not a War for Freedom of the Iraqi People, or a War on Terrorism. It's a war to reshape the Middle East and to gain control of potentially available Middle Eastern oil resources. And it's not going to end any time soon.

And my worst fear is this...once the Administration loses open support from Congress, it will take another major US catastrophe to shake the foundation and mindset of the American politicians, and those of the public that has swayed to the other side.

In fact, my greatest fear is that something will happen before the elections, or that the elections will be "stolen" again...

Time will telll...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get used to this War Posted by: jontv
» RE: Get used to this War Posted by: CatDad
We deserve better!
Posted by: keefus55 on Oct 23, 2006 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that every time I see (or hear) "Dubya" open his mouth, all I can think of is J.R. Ewing?

Thanks largely to the work of President George W. Bush, the goons in his Administration and his willing band of co-conspirators in the US Congress, we now have an arrogant, imperialistic government populated with frauds, crooks, thieves, liars, perverts and hypocrites.

Sadly, under the iron-fisted, despotic rule of our "Liar In Chief", the United States of America is now a country that projects an image to the rest of the world of everything that it is not, while condemning everything that it is.

Our nation deserves better…much better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We deserve better! Posted by: dmdem
If you accept US governmental complicity in 9/11
Posted by: rockpicker on Oct 23, 2006 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then you have to be prepared to accept a repeat, or worse, when the chips are down. And it looks like they're pretty down right now.

The entire world is on a stand-by war footing, as we type. The US and its allies have been gathering ships in the Persian Gulf for a month. Nato forces have come together in the eastern Mediterranean, under German command. Russia, and its allies,
have been conducting live-fly and live-fire exercises since end of August, with NORAD intercepts off the coast of Alaska. Oh, and let's not forget the target, Iran, continues to be in a heightened state of readiness.

Back home, things look grim for the "grand ol' party." Rove's promised us an October surprise. Bush is smiling and cool. Cold, in fact, to his evangelical base. So what's up?

"Fool me once...and...uh...shame on you. Fool me twi...uh..uh...you should't fool me twice."

What would be simpler, or more expedient, than touching off a small device somewhere inside the USA, blame it on Iranian operatives, declare martial law and pounce on Iran with the country's blessing? Way out there?

9/11 was way out there. Prepare for the unexpected.

Aho.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

una voce
Posted by: Una Voce on Oct 23, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While all eyes are on the elections and the death tolls in Baghdad- has anyone asked about the progress of the oil companies in other parts of Iraq?- we won't be pulling troops out until the oil is smoothly moving out of Iraq- and the oil money is flowing to exxon, etal. That is why we are 'staying the course'..remember?.... "no blood for oil ? "
The GOAL in Iraq is to plunder oil- everything else, including civilian and our military death toll, homeland "security" are irrelevant to this administration. Do we know what is going on in the rest of Iraq? I have not seen any reports of 'progress'.....have the companies set up their rigs- are the pipelines in action ? How long does it take?, a year or 2 to get oil from the ground into pipelines.....that's how long this "war" will continue......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: una voce Posted by: famouspipeliner
The plan is...
Posted by: rockpicker on Oct 23, 2006 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we sit on the oil until it's needed. Canada supplies the US with twice as much oil as the next largest importer. We don't need Iraqi oil right now. But, of course, we will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should be scared: the threat is real
Posted by: Bobsays on Oct 23, 2006 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything in that commercial is true. Yo can't fault them on that. What you can fault them on is their ineptitude and failing into the trap laid by al Qaeda. So far, we have done everything they have wanted to provoke us to do in order to build their case for the 20 year strategy to bring the US down. We have done our bit in helping them to get there: that's why the GOP needs to be punished. But are the Dems deserving of this reward? No! The Dems do not have a response, and they better bloody well get one because there is only three weeks to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bringing America down Posted by: Edward George
“Be Afraid; Be Very, Very Afraid.” I Am. ©
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Oct 23, 2006 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Robert Parry . . .

I greatly appreciate your assessment of “These Are The Stakes.” The clock is ticking on America or so we are told.

You mention what Bush, the Republicans, [and others] ignore. I observed similar and wrote of this. In my exposé, I traveled a different path than you did, though I acknowledge the validity and value of your journey.

I am grateful for your analysis. In the last five years, I have marveled. Bush and Bin Laden seem to have the same speechwriter.

For years, if I listen to or read the text of one, I realize I have read or heard the other.

Each was raised in the world of the elite and each sees evil in others. For either man, all that disagree with them are their enemies.

They both believe God walks with them, or speaks through them. They are a fascinating pair.

What I fear most is that a supposed well informed populace; the people within the only world “superpower” actually placed a zealot into office! That they accept one fanatic and fear another that, for me, is frightening!

I invite you to review my own perspective. “Be Afraid; Be Very, Very Afraid.” I Am. ©

Betsy L. Angert
BeThink.org or Be-Think

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same Old Song And Dance
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 23, 2006 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They keep playing the same old broken record but the sheep apparently like the tune. The GOP is now being exposed for the hypocrites they truly are so their ads wont be as effective this time around. Truthfully if everything they did would get exposed there would be no more republican Party. Until we become a Socialist Democracy the record will continue to skip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Bush Is Touting vis a vis OBL
Posted by: pelle_in_goal on Oct 23, 2006 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Face it -- by Bush's own post-9/11 surmising and call to arms -- "the terrorists have won." Even if one discounts his now infamous suggestion: "go shopping" there's nothing the president has said or done since that's made or broken Osama in Afghanistan, Pakistan, or Iraq, or anywhere else. Bush has, in fact, made OBL into the Middle Eastern equivalent of that inflatable Hollween pumpkin you've been sporting on your front lawn.

The War On Terror has produced the shame of Tora Bora, deception on such a massive scale that it should lead to impeachment and courts martial by any truly competent government, and the biggest fall from grace of any nation or empire in world history. Bush's bumbling has left us to face the world knowing it's done with virtually complete unaccountably and shameless discredit, and worst of all -- severe repression on the American home front.

Not in his wildest dreams did Osama do the 9/11 Attacks hoping he would be as successful as he's been in deluding Bush and Congress to hand over America on a platter to the Banana Republicans.

It's almost sad in a way -- Bush the dry drunk chasing bogeymen one day and re-inventing them the next. It's sadder still to see the cable news pundits act like enough people will fall for Bush's scare tactics one more time -- without having to fix a general election to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And it's been five years! Posted by: Bobsays
mark
Posted by: mikmojo06 on Oct 23, 2006 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should come as no surprise that Republicans will use any means necessary to win elections, see Kerry, McCain, Max Cleland, Murtha smears. But the Osama picture smear is so easy to counter with pictorial truths, if the Dems only had the courage. There is no family in the U.S. closer to the bin Ladens than the Bush Clan. Surely pictures of the clans together are available. Pictures of Rummy and Saddam are common, show them. Videos of Condy dismissing the 9-11 threats are legend. If you can't play this game get out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans?
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll be 67 in a few days, and my memory is still functional. I can remember REAL Republicans, and, folks, this gang in power ain't them. What we have here are a dirty bunch of crooks, thugs, and liars posing as Republicans. In short, they're impostors. Take a good look around and see if you can find giant pods. Seriously, though, how many of you out there agree with me?Let's talk about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublicans? Posted by: edith
Far Worse than That
Posted by: vkobaya on Oct 23, 2006 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans are far more desperate and vile in their ads than just claiming that withdrawal from Iraq would serve the terrorists. They are equating Democrats with terrorists, accusing the blue states with allying with Germany and France in an anti-Amercan alliance, accusing us of being enemies of the state who hate America, calling Pelosi, Kerry, Clinton and others of treason, etc. The face of those accusations are so extreme, corrupt and unAmerican as to tell us who the real enemies of America are, those who would desecrate the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the laws of this nation for the sake of power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the US attitude and approach
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 23, 2006 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have said it before, the USA and the West just needs to stay out of the business of trying to influence and control the Arab countries and Muslims. Trust me, if the USA does so, I do believe the Arab countries will be more then happy to keep sellling oil to the West. Terrorists and Osama are bred by foolish US practices like unconditional support for Israel and US support for dictatorial tyrants in the Arab world. Of course, as everyone has pointed out, GW Bush seems to be Osama's right hand man with his practices. Between Guantanamo, extraordinary rendition, the post 911 roundups, all of which were heavily publicized in the Arab media, the USA has created fertile conditions for generating extremists.

There is no reason for Muslims and Arabs to be enemies of the USA and the USA should not make them its enemies. But if you go in with a big stick and with support and weapons to support the illegal actions of countries like Israel, then the problems begin. Big mistake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is great fiction!
Posted by: slydad on Oct 23, 2006 8:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just love reading articles like this. It shows a real creative side of liberals. Just when they’ve come up with what seems like the most far fetched conspiracy that they could ever create, they have another one. And this one sure doesn’t let the reader down.

Hey! I’ve got a couple more to throw out there too. Let’s see . . .

Bush caused the gas prices to come down to help Republicans in the mid-term election . . . Oh wait . . . they already used that one.

Here’s one: Bush caused there to be less hurricanes this year to give his brother a break down in Florida so Jeb can focus better on the election campaigns.

How ‘bout: They actually caught Bin Laden a while back. They’re just waiting for the right political timing to release this information. Oh yea, they already used that one too.

I know! The Foley scandal was actually done on purpose just to get the gay vote.

I don’t know. None of mine seem to be as good as the ones I see on this site, so I guess I’ll have to retire from fictional writing and just enjoy all the fiction on this web site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is great fiction! Posted by: rockpicker
» Yes! Posted by: slydad
» RE: Yes! Posted by: HeroesAll
» Blinded by the light. Posted by: slydad
» RE: Yes! Posted by: jontv
» Oh no! Posted by: slydad
Bushies
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 24, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies are the greatest conspiracy creators of all time. Their conspiracies created 9/11, the Afghan war, the Iraq war, the Lebanon war and coming soon the Iran war which they may have to call off if the Dems win House/Senate. Stay tuned for the fireworks that may kill us all or the fireworks of a real election which could save us all. Heads or tails?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bushies Posted by: edith
Peddling Fear
Posted by: keefus55 on Oct 24, 2006 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the "War on Terror" is so horrific, then how come all the "terrorists" “King George” Bush and “Field Marshal” Rumsfeld are illegally holding indefinitely down at Gitmo are still being (politely) referred to as "detainees"?

And, how come the NSA and the CIA can easily read my license plate from space as well as tap my phone, read all my e-mails at will, and even know when I post a comment on the Internet, yet seem to have an extreme amount of difficulty locating a Bedouin like Bin Laden and his henchmen, all of whom are supposedly traveling ON FOOT (and dragging a dialysis machine along, no less!) in a clearly defined mountainous region of the world?

Could it simply be that Bin Laden and the Taliban might be FAR more valuable to Bush and the Republicans alive and kicking than dead?

60 years ago, at the height of World War II, our then President Franklin Roosevelt told us the "Only fear we had to fear was fear itself". However, THIS President and his Republican goons are actually now running campaign TV commercials pointing to the face of Bin Laden and telling us over and over again to "Be afraid…. be very afraid."

Mr. President, terrorism only works when people are afraid!. So, why have you and your merry band of despots now crawled into bed with Bin Laden and the terrorists to foment and perpetuate those EXACT same fears?

Could it be that without Bin Laden still at large (and his "detainees" firmly behind bars for Mr. Bush and his ilk to keep pointing to) his "War on Terror" simply evaporates in the shallow minds of the millions upon millions of ignorant lemmings who STILL eagerly and unquestioningly swallow such manufactured BS hook, line and sinker…. thereby keeping Bush and his Congressional Cabal in office?

If it walks like a duck………

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you have no love for Rove...
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 24, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then you'll love this

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is tragic...
Posted by: nzo on Oct 24, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is not that our corrupt politicians are laughing all the way to the bank. What is tragic is that we continue to allow ourselves to be suckered. Wake up! Did I say it? Wake up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop Helping the Fascists
Posted by: opeluboy on Oct 24, 2006 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this War on Terror nonsense (or my preference, The War Against Terror; better acronym, better t-shirt) would hit the ground like the huge, steaming pile of bullshit it is if the feeble, gutless Democrats would stop enabling their evil twins.

When Dems rear up on their hind legs and beat their chests, like little Hillary, swearing to killl more brown-skinned people than the Repugs, and lend credence to the whole foolish and impossible notion of waging war against a tactic, they allow ridiculous ads like this to exist.

There is no War on Terror. The only way to make us safer is to honestly address the issues that have made us targets.

Unfortunately, this is not something either side will do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Was it Henry the 8th, was it Stalin, Was it Hitler, or was it Bush
Posted by: jreal on Oct 24, 2006 10:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican controlled congress spent 40 million investigating Bill Clintons sex life.
Republican controlled congress spent 600,000 investigating 9/11.

Lies. Deceit. Cover-ups.

Why do Republicans hate Americans?

Why did they go against Democratic objections that invading Iraq instead of a thorough invasion of Afghanistan, would fuel terrorism?

And why are they now using that terrorism that they supported in Iraq to make Democrats look weak who objected to it in the first place?

Was this there tactic the whole time?
Is it safe for us to keep these people in control?

A vote for a Republican is a vote for terrorism.

Now it's up to you. Do you want to keep fueling terrorism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one here knows the truth of the matter!