comments_image -

Poll: Abuse of power doesn't matter to most Americans

Lies, damned lies, and statistics in the Foley case
October 18, 2006  |  
 
Advertisement
 

I'd just like to see one poll that even strives to paint a bigger picture.

Plucking at random, I see a piece in the Seattle P-I by a Marsha Mercer, pushing the same, already tired, concept: Foley doesn't matter to voters. End of story.

It's not the end of the story. In order to get anything resembling a useful picture we'd need to see the opinions of people who know what's going on, versus those who don't. It's like pre-Iraq War polls where public opinion may have gone a certain way, but public opinion was misinformed. Not of a "different" understanding. But wrong. Plain wrong.

So what we end up getting is simply a gauge of how well the available information and the ensuing PR operation are faring in the media. In the Foley case, Hastert admits to hearing about a "katrina message" in one instance, and "over-friendly" messages in another, several months ago. That the parents of the page involved asked that the communications be stopped.

Rep. Tom Reynolds says he told Hastert months before about "inappropriate" messages and Majority Leader Jim Boehner claims that Hastert told him he was "taking care of it" several months earlier as well. Conservative Bay Buchanan commented that the earliest emails "had predator stamped all over [them]."

These are all republicans. If this isn't a cover-up it's the most colossally dim-witted and out of touch group of people going. All this is to say that I had a conversation with an especially well-informed friend who was aware of exactly none of the above. He had been listening to NPR and watching TV and was essentially under the impression -- as handlers sought to create from the outset -- that there were a bunch of conflicting accounts of conversations waiting to be untangled. While it's true to an extent, and while none of the above constitutes "beyond a reasonable doubt" evidence, I'm burning with curiosity about the number of respondents in these polls, echoing in the media caves, who are both aware of the Republican accusations and who responded that they don't care a whit.

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: foley, 2006, polls
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]