Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A War of the Words Against George Bush

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted October 16, 2006.


Apt quotes from some of the most eloquent Bush critics in our era -- from Howard Zinn to Barbara Ehrenreich.
Advertisement

For Homer, those epithets attached to his heroes and gods were undoubtedly mnemonic devices -- the fleet-footed Achilles, Poseidon, the Earth-shaker, the wily Odysseus, the ox-eyed Hera. But isn't it strange how many similar, if somewhat less heroic, catchwords and phrases have adhered to key officials of the Bush administration these last years. Here's my own partial list:

President George ("Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job") Bush, Vice President Dick ("last throes") Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald ("stuff happens") Rumsfeld, then-National Security Advisor, now-Secretary of State Condoleezza ("mushroom cloud") Rice, CIA Director George ("slam dunk") Tenet, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul ("[Iraq] floats on a sea of oil") Wolfowitz, Centcom Commander Gen. Tommy ("We don't do body counts") Franks, then-White House Counsel, now-Attorney General Alberto ("quaint") Gonzales, withdrawn Supreme Court nominee and White House Counsel Harriet ("You are the best governor ever") Miers, and most recently Dennis ("The buck stops here") Hastert.

You know a person by the company he or she keeps -- so the saying goes. You could also say that you know an administration by the linguistic company it keeps; and though George Bush is usually presented as an inarticulate stumbler of a speech and news-conference giver, it's nothing short of remarkable how many new words and phrases (or redefined old ones) this president and his administration have managed to lodge in our lives and our heads.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, the United States has been not so much the planet's lone "hyperpower" as its gunslinger in that great Western ("dead or alive") tradition that George and Dick learned about in the movies of their childhood. But fast as they've reached for their guns (and may do so again in relation to Iran after the midterm elections), over the last years they've reached for one thing faster: their dictionaries.

And of all the words that came to their minds post-9/11, the first and fastest was an old one -- "war." Within hours of the 9/11 attacks, it was already on the scene and being redefined by administration officials and supporters. We would not, for instance, actually declare war. After all, who was war to be declared on? We were simply "at war" and that was that. Since then, according to George Bush and his associates, we have either been fighting "the Global War on Terror" (aka GWOT), "the long war," "the millennium war," "World War III," or "World War IV." We not only entered an immediate state of war, but one meant to last generations, and with it we got a commander-in-chief presidency secretly redefined in such a way as to place it outside any legal boundaries.

We were, then, at war. But the first war we were "at" was a war of the words, and at its heart from the beginning was the status of the people we were capturing on or near various battlefields, or even kidnapping off the streets of European cities, and exactly what we could do to them. If John F. Kennedy is remembered for saying, "Ich bin ein Berliner," perhaps when history shrinks George W. Bush to a soundbite, it will be, "We abide by the law of the United States; we do not torture." To say those words -- repeatedly -- he has had to mount not a soapbox, nor even the TV or radio version of a bully pulpit, but a pile of torn, trampled dictionaries.

If you don't believe me, go back and read, for instance, the infamous "torture memo" of 2002, in which the top legal minds of the Justice Department and the White House Counsel's office labored over how to define "severe" and "pain" in such a way that almost no inflicted pain in a prisoner's interrogation would ever prove too "severe." Whole sections of that document sound like they were cobbled together by a learned panel for a new edition of some devil's dictionary. ("The word 'profound' has a number of meanings, all of which convey a significant depth. Webster's New International Dictionary 1977 [2nd ed. 1935] defines profound as ...").


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, ehrenreich

Tom Engelhardt, who runs the Nation Institute's Tomdispatch.com ("a regular antidote to the mainstream media"), is the co-founder of the American Empire Project and, most recently, the author of "Mission Unaccomplished: Tomdispatch Interviews with American Iconoclasts and Dissenters" (Nation Books), the first collection of Tomdispatch interviews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Only one word needed now: Impeachment
Posted by: LeftWright on Oct 16, 2006 12:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stolen elections.

9/11 complicity.

Illegal Wiretapping.

Illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Torture.

Extraordinary renditions and secret prisons.

Lies upon lies upon lies.......

Wake up, brothers and sisters, it's time to clean house.

The White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Then ban money from our politics, forever.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lost puppies Posted by: Patriot50
My words: war crimes
Posted by: HeroesAll on Oct 16, 2006 2:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about adding 'detention' to that list? A normal person would call it imprisonment, but we (US, UK, Oz) call it detention. Here in Oz, we put innocents fleeing the world's trouble spots (which we're helping to create, by our support of the US wars everywhere) into 'detention'. The fact that they're confined to barracks, regimented in what they can do and when, that the suicide and self-harm rate is appallingly high, and that every human rights group on god's green earth has condemned us, doesn't convince the government: it's still 'detention'. Clean words for dirty actions.

And what infuriates me the most is the absolute disinterest of most people in the atrocities we're perpetrating. Aggressive war, torture, arbitrary and indefinite imprisonment, denial of natural justice (a trial, for godssakes, with evidence!): just about every evil we accuse others of we commit ourselves. And so many Australians, so many Americans, don't care. Can't be bothered. Don't consider the fact that we're busy annihilating innocent people to be more important than a few percentage points of GDP. Think a token tax cut at election time more important than human rights and human dignity.

And yet we still find ourselves able to preen about our committment to democracy and human rights. How civilised we are. How fair. If I were John Howard, and knew myself responsible for what he's been responsible for, I would have killed myself years ago.

Godammit, I'm ashamed of my country, I'm ashamed of my race, and I'm ashamed of my planet. What the fuck is wrong with us? Is there any hope at all? Sometimes I think it would be for the best if we just let the neocon cabal start this bloody nuclear war and get it all over with. This human race is too evil, too venal, and too selfish to live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My words: war crimes Posted by: symcokid
» RE: My words: war crimes Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: My words: war crimes Posted by: thejollyreaper
Questions
Posted by: spacemarine83 on Oct 16, 2006 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, here goes-

Was the war in Afghanistan really illegal? The reason I say is that all conspiracy theories aside, (according to facts) bin Laden was based out of that country, and supported by a radical muslim government. They attacked we responded.

Second, based upon the info given by the Gov. about what was contained in Iraq, we went. No questions, we just did it. I cannot say any further than that, you all know why.

Third- people who support torture do so because they see that if a person is going to attack you, and you catch a leader of the attackers, you want to know where, when, how, etc etc. Most americans support torture on the basis of fear right? I mean that we all would agree with torturing a man if he had information about (or masterminded the attack and had info as to the target) sent a person to America with a nuclear bomb in a backpack )or whatever, just follow me here) with the intention of blowing the heart out of one of our cities, say LA or NYC. The benefits of one mans life would outwieght the costs. (I do not have a pro or anti view of torture, but I just know how people I talk to justify it)

Fourth- Didnt like ALL of congress agree on Afghanistan, if not at least 95%? and didnt a majority agree on giving the pres. power to attack at will, without prior permission of congress to declare war? To me, it would seem that Americans gave up a vast amount of freedom and legal rights to the pres, am I correct?

Again, please I am just curios. A little tired so please forgive any typos and such...long day

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questions Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Questions Posted by: trashdog
» RE: Questions on Afghanistan Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Questions on Afghanistan Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Questions Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: Questions Posted by: spacemarine83
» RE: Questions Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Questions Posted by: spacemarine83
» RE: Questions Posted by: drmeow
» RE: Questions Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Questions Posted by: wolfdaughter
» RE: Questions Posted by: roo
» Suspicious, are you, eddie? Posted by: LeftWright
» Um, about 9/11 Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Um, about 9/11 Posted by: mjabele
imprisonment
Posted by: spacemarine83 on Oct 16, 2006 2:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we should just treat people whom we capture in foreign countries as POWs. It gets us nowhere to be barbaric. I mean it just gives the other side the ability to murder captives and be justified. In war we fight, but once the battle is over, we are to TRY to be civilized. ( or we should, as my unit had a no tolerance policy of being aholes after the fight was over) We should adhere to Geneva Conventions and call it that. Give them a trial or whatever if they attack civvies and punish them, whether by hanging or firing squad, but it should be done by civil authorities.

Keeping these pople in Cuba is a mistake, and only brings us condemnation. We should process them and hold them as necessary, treating them humanely, but making black hole prisons and such around the world makes us no better than them.

We should be doing the right thing...even as war is a necessary evil...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: imprisonment Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: imprisonment Posted by: spacemarine83
» RE: imprisonment Posted by: andyc
» RE: imprisonment Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: imprisonment Posted by: spacemarine83
» RE: imprisonment Posted by: andyc
» Yeahbut... Posted by: fiskhus
propaganda
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 16, 2006 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have what can only be properly described as the propaganda presidency, PP, where every speach and statement is designed to keep the failed presidency/congress in the current sick, deadly configuration coupled with pre-emptive war and pre-emptive election stealing. We will know in November if this fascist mode is still working. If it is then decent people will have to construct a more creative and effective response.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question
Posted by: spacemarine83 on Oct 16, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how was the invasion of afghanistan and iraq illegal? Didnt congress give all authority to President? I am curious thats all...

Respectfully,

Callahan318

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Question Posted by: Lauren
» Honor, Duty, Integrity, Etc. Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Question Posted by: Monitor523
We are livng in someones bad acid trip
Posted by: mat38 on Oct 16, 2006 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has become a place of smoke and mirrors and while you are trying to figure out what is going on around you the wealty eleit are staeling your money from your closed fist and you don't even know it.
What Tom is saying here is that it is all by design and W's moronic syntax is probably authentic but his intentions, and those of the wealthy gilded society, are nothing less decietful than some crack heaq sneaking into your home to steal whatever he can get his hands on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yea yea, Bush is evil...
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 16, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... you're shocked and disappointed? Surprised? The US has been doing this shit for decades, nothing is particularly different in US foreign policy today than ten years ago. Twenty. Forty.

Though, seemingly, the number of people the US is willing to bomb, starve, and torture to death is directly perportunate to the profits gained.

Keep attacking Bush all you want, when he's gone in 2008 nothing will have changed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, well said... but Posted by: Ghoulman
Reality has fallen and it can't get up
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Oct 16, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find that most of my friends and family cannot and will not engage in any protest or even debate on what is transpiring. I think reality is suspended and most are walking around in a fugue state, stunned beyond comprehension at this ongoing cataclysmic trashing of all that is honourable and true. 655,000 dead in Iraq and climbing daily. Innocents. yes, some of us debate here and other places, some of us march and protest but where are the millions and millions of ordinary people. All taking it on the chin? All in this fugue state. Is there something in our water/air? Most are shocked and awed into utter paralysis. I for one am frightened not of the evil cabal, but for the masses and masses of silent lemmings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» same boat Posted by: grim ripper
» RE: Habeas Corpus R.I.P. Posted by: symcokid
Reality
Posted by: vangogh69 on Oct 16, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is the best president ever. America is a beacon of freedom and democracy. The War on Terror is being won.

And now you wake up.

Reality has truly surpassed fiction in these days, with tragedy and horror beign the preferred genres. There's so much to be angry about, so much to be sick about, what can you do? I think there's a vast caldrum of anger just seething beneath the surface of American life, just waiting for the catalyst to make it explode. Perhaps I'm mis-interpreting the situation? Any thoughts???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality Posted by: symcokid
Heckuvajob Brownie
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 16, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Mississippi and witnessed Katrina first hand and I can tell you people here who used to love Bush hated him then. I think his heckuvajob brownie speech was proof of how ignorant he really is. Hopefully the same people who hated him then will vote against his party now, but you never know what a sheep will do when he is being led astray.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's 1984
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 16, 2006 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you so much for this. I was feeling kinda low this morning, thinking about the hundreds of thousands of our victims in Iraq and the unbelievable evil that is our empire, but this story is so very good about putting all that in one basket it is uplifting.

The scales are falling from our people's eyes. It is rather a shock to see reality, a stunned reaction is normal. The anger will soon apropriately be expressed at the polls.

We can do it. Don't be afraid to vote for 3rd party candidates either, it sends a real message to the dominate parties and the spinning gate keepers about what we actually want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Torture
Posted by: Gregor on Oct 16, 2006 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Torture does not work. They have done studies on the methodology during and after WWII and found that more information was gained from "being nice" and NOT torturing, than torture.

Torture also turns the perpetrators into bullies, criminals and psychopaths. So again, if this administraiton ever went to school, read a history book or two or even studied human psychology, maybe they would find this stuff out...But yet, they don't. And probably because someone is making big bucks off of heinous stuff like war, death and now torture. Aak, its sickening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Torture Posted by: lucille
Where Bush/Cheney would end up was foreseeable
Posted by: cognitorex on Oct 16, 2006 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Ghost of Arafat
.
(Note: this post was written in January 05. Events, opinions and policies have now caught up with this 18 month old post.)

Iraq is now a civil war. We have simply chosen a side. References to Vietnam are tactically correct, but passe politically. The analogies are Israel/Palestine and Northern Ireland.

The ghost of Arafat will appear from the Sunni side and George B. to his enormous bile-choking displeasure will have to deal. Were that it were otherwise but this is written.

Fielding one per cent of the Sunni fighting-age men as active insurgents/freedom fighters with three percent as cadre (40,000) creates a stalemate. They can not dislodge us and our Shia forces nor can we pacify them.

Personally I would find this leader (or group) now and begin the next phase. Offer them administrative control of electric and water reconstruction projects. They create no-kill, no-maim zones, implement the projects, Halliburton yes, Halliburton no, who cares, and we release the money on a quasi 'completion' basis.

This gambit lacks all pride and ego but we do get to stay a while.

Sarge might say "Light em if you got em," for a change.

(Jan .05‘)

Thugs in Suits

Thugs in suits,
wearing crosses,
speaking Jesus,
doing trash.

Blood of Inquisitors,
long cold,
warms

Thugs in suits,
wearing crosses,
speaking Jesus,
doing trash.

(Feb 04’)


'TOKYO AND TEXAS'*

I recently went to Tokyo,
gosh, they all speak Japanese!

In Rome, in church, guess?
people praying on their knees.

In West Texas, oil men, so friendly,
saying, "I'm honest" with a drawl.

and, "Shucks son, I'm so sorry,
it didn't work out for y'all."

June 20, 2004

(google cognitorex and Arafat’ or Thugs’ or Tokyo’ to see initial posting)

My apologies for the long posting but if you had sat with some bankers 35 years ago who casually predicted the slaughter-to-be in the Balkans long before Tito’s death set the combatants free and you had done a billion dollars worth of business in the SW U.S. oil patch you would, as I, fairly seen where events would lead. Seeing it is not rocket science; doing something about it is excruciatingly nigh impossible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Monster that Ate My Vote" ( a New Cartoon )
Posted by: what now cartoons on Oct 16, 2006 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corporate elite, who, "with intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this democracy with envious eyes,and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. And early in the twenty-first century came the great deception."
Yes, the Robber Barron's are back, and this time they have locked down the voice of the people with Electronic Voting Machines. These technological terrors have ( in my opinion ) tipped the outcome of many elections in favor of the Corporate Masters. Now on the eve of what seems to be a democratic victory in the House and Senate, the shadow of these vote eating monsters looms over our greatest hopes for a return to a Jeffersonian democracy. My latest cartoon "The Monster That Ate My Vote" can be seen at my website.
www.whatnowtoons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stick and Stones
Posted by: yankabroad on Oct 22, 2006 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sticks and Stones may break his bones but names will never hurt him.

The only thing, it appears, that can stop Bush is tanks in the streets.

I think you are stuck with him for the next 220 odd days--until his term ends.

But, at least he'll be a lame duck president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]