Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Let's Face It, Penises Dominate American Politics

By , BuzzFlash. Posted October 7, 2006.


Americans entering politics should not worry if they commit war crimes; the key to survival is to leave your sex organs at home before you do battle in Congress.
100706story1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Thank God for Mark Foley.

It proves that the American people still care about something.

It happens to be penises. But still.

They care about who talks about them, who plays with them, who covers them up, who uncovers them, who covers up the uncovering of them.

Even Jon Stewart put the big penis cover-up ahead of the fact that this government just passed a law that says that George Bush can say, "Hey you, you're an enemy combatant, "and once he says that they can whisk you away.

This is literally true. It's like that joke in the first grade.

Make me a milkshake

Poof: You're a milkshake

If George Bush says: you're an enemy combatant. Poof! You are one. And then they can take you to Guantanamo, do not pass go, do not call your attorney, do not see a judge, do not hear the charges against you, go straight to the cage they want to put you in. The cage comes with lights that stay on 24 hours a day and wake-up calls every fifteen minutes so you never get to sleep and special exercise programs where you stand for hours in 'stress' positions, upward screaming cat, squatting tortured turtle, and other lite abuses that used to quaintly prohibited by the Geneva Conventions.

Today's joke:

Q: What do Americans do after they commit war crimes?

A: They pass a law that says they can't be prosecuted for committing war crimes.

If you don't find that funny, if you actually think that's serious, then I ask you come nobody else does. How come CNN doesn't care, NBC, the NY Times? How come the Democratic leadership doesn't care?

How did that that bill -- that contains all those provisions and more -- got passed without a filibuster? Without a fuss?

Thank God for Mark Foley. An old congressman hitting on teenage boys, that's real news.

I was watching CNN yesterday afternoon. It was All Penis, All the Time.

Here's a quote, from one of their reporters, "One question always rises to the top: 'who knew what, and when did they know it.'"

That's true, but only when it has to do with a penis.

Last week Bob Woodward's new book came out. One of the things he revealed was an additional meeting between the head of the CIA and Condoleeza Rice, back in July 2001, in which they tried to shock her, shake her up in doing something about terrorism.

That meeting is important for several reasons.

The fact that she didn't anything about it led to the deaths of at least 3,000 people. Call me me crazy, call me irresponsible, but that seems more important than an old queen hitting on young teens.

That meeting was kept secret from the 9/11 Commission, congress and the American people. There's no security reason for it to be secret. Only a political one. Proof, once again, that 9/11 happened because the Bush Administration was asleep at the wheel.

When the book came out, Rice denied the meeting had happened. She flat out lied about it.

Documents proved it took place.

I don't see CNN, or anybody else, hounding the White House about Condoleeza Rice's cover up and her lies.

"One question always rises to the top: who knew what and when did they know it?"


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
penises
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 7, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who plays with penises more, men or women? Answer: neither, it's warmongering pricks like Kissinger, Cheney and Bush who do mass murder with their penises. Iraq is their current heaven and their prime helpers are mass USA media whose main job these days is to cover up for sex maniacs like Kissinger, Cheney, Bush and Rice who get laws passed that devour the Constitution so they can torture anyone they want anywhere, guilty or not, citizens of anywhere. It's fascism circa 2006 where the world's creepiest killers are in charge of doomsday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: penises Posted by: rusty62
» RE: penises Posted by: Disconsolate Chimera
» RE: penises Posted by: Rin Daemoko
» More gatekeeping by AlterNet Posted by: LeftWright
» Trollop alert! Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Americans don't care about penises, but the politcal elite & the rich want to make it about penises.
Posted by: political_outcast on Oct 7, 2006 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you wrote:
It proves that the American people still care about something.
It happens to be penises.



Americans don't care about penises, but the politcal elite & the rich want to make it about penises. And so therefore the elite media and the fakeLeft play right along with the political elite and their rich backers. The American people want to tax the rich and pay for their healthcare with those taxes. Not surprising the rich use the political rightwing GOP and the fakeLeft Democrats and the media to divert attention to other topics. And the fakeLeft writers and activists aint shy about helping the rich out.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wouldn't touch this discussion with a stick
Posted by: druidlaw on Oct 7, 2006 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Due to circumcisions beyond my control, I
think it wiser and better, considering the " report
this message link " to stay out of this rather
ballsy discussion of electile dysfunction. Suffice it
to say that this whole discussion proves that
government service is anything but hard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey, Conservabot... Posted by: Plexius
» RE: Hey, Conservabot... Posted by: Conservasaurus
Human nature.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 7, 2006 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The delight that people take in wallowing in the frailties of other people is innate to human nature. We all feel superior to the person who got caught.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Human nature. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» money, power, and Foley's penis Posted by: eddie torres
I think the Republicans outed Foley themselves
Posted by: Lizmv on Oct 7, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They knew the media needed to be distracted from news of Woodward's book and the fallout from giving Bush what he wanted.
Even if the Democrats do manage to beat back the Republicans in November, will the public remember come January? Will there be calls for a Democratic Senate and Congress to roll back those laws or demands for an investigation into the White House's neglegance? Somehow I doubt it, as there seems to be far more thinking with the 'little head' going on everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Penises, Huh?
Posted by: John Walters on Oct 7, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always said...there may be one Richard in the White House Administration, but they are all Dicks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dick and Bush Posted by: Artkansas
The Torture bill is Unconnected to Mark Foley's Groin
Posted by: edith on Oct 7, 2006 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the main point of the article was how Congress passed an important and repressive piece of legislation without significnt oppostion. The author chose to select a male sex organ as the "come-on" to motivate readers to read an article about the torture/prisoner issue. I found the author and/or editor's technique pathetic. Not because of the sexual reference. But because it insults the intellegence of readers. The topic of torture and rights of prisoners in the "terror" war has been frequently discussed on this site and other political sites. The passage of the "compromise" between McCain and Bush in particular received heavy coverage and commentary here within the past week. Cable and broadcast news covered the putative "split" in the GOP concerning torture, and then the compromise which really is a Bush win. I've heard little disagreement that the consensus bill was not a Bush win.

But Foley and the misuse of his libido then roll (or are dragged) into the news and the Alternet's author wants to make a cute point; serious attack on US liberty blocked by Foley Phallus. OK. Ha Ha.

Not only was the torture issue settled, for better or worse, before the infantile Foley staggered and then left the stage, but it had nothing to do with Foley, either as a legitimate Congressman from Fla(I assume he supported Bush) or as a sexual predator.

People really read Alternet stories for the content. Really, They don't need cute National Enquirer headlines nor connections that are sensational and untrue to read relevant content that's important. Mark Foley is a pathetic man. A loser. Not only was he a hypocrite in his sexual stances but he seems like a mediocre immature male stalled in early adolescence. The type that snickers if someone says the words "penis" or "vagina".

That is however the repugnant and pathetic Foley. Is it the state of mind of some writers published on Alternet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We know where the authors head is
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Oct 7, 2006 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The fact that she (Rice) didn't do anything about it led to the deaths of at least 3,000 people. Call me me crazy, call me irresponsible, but that seems more important than an old queen hitting on young teens."

Ok, I'll call you "crazy& irresponsible" an suggest you stick to penis stories

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We know where the authors head is..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Jouros titilated with penises missing the entire point.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 7, 2006 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can talk yourselves to death on Foley, which is quite meaningless unless a some real investigative journalism is done going back to Larry King and the Franklin Savings and Loan treachery that Bush I covered of Omaha and sex slavery of real children and the connection to Boystown. That is the sickest, ugliest moment in US pedophilia history on the hill and makes this incident look totally harmless.
www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=
359924937663867563&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=undefined
educate-yourself.org/cn/
goschgannohuntertrublingtale05apr05.shtml

This also hides the abominiation of HR: 6166 / S: 3930 and the fact the US is moving command of the Afghan "war" to NATO and that Iraq is completely out of control, the lies of the Bush administration before and after 9/11 and what it has done to what used to be a constitutional representative republic. Judah (Israel) is totally out of control and pushing for all out nuclear war and has gone far beyond occupation of Palistine. They are also guilty of far worse war criminal acts than what is happening in Iraq. Unfortunately, people would have to be fluent in French or the Turkish language to get any viable information on the situation in occupied Lebanon and Palistine. The US doesn't have a free press.

The Foley situation is nothing but noise to hide far more important information from the people that this government is far more corrupt than a page scandle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Penises have always run politics!
Posted by: kclaf on Oct 7, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even when not discussed, penises have always been 'in charge'........men, until fairly recently, have always been in charge of politics and they still are........obviously. We are in a mess here, and who got us there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Voters have always run politics! Posted by: MartianBachelor
Need you look any further...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 7, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than the Washington Monument to know that the almighty phallic symbol rises above all in our Capitol?

Coincidence? Me thinks not. But it may be reaching critical mass.

New on EWM:
Not all Republicans make good pets.
...We are witnessing one of the Christian Right’s worst impulses play out as the House Republican Caucus agonizes over the Foley page scandal. Not satisfied with a mere condemnation of Foley’s vile behavior, Tony Perkins and his Family Research Council are using it as an excuse to spread bigotry and intolerance.

The delusional Perkins is convinced that gay people are predisposed to predation and he’s launching a witch hunt that may end up burning the GOP at the stake–losing their congressional majorities will just be the appetizer...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANYTHING BUT IRAQ
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 7, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope these young guys (and their parents) aren't laying the groundwork for a lawsuit. Far as I can tell there are no e-mails saying "go away old man". It was mutual . Makes me wonder what the world thinks about the leaders of a country who allow this silliness to dominate their time. It's good for a few days entertainment then we should move on. Iraq is a tradgedy. For that they're out of town. Now there's a moral dilemma. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're right Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: not right Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: not right Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: not right Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: not right Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: not right Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: still not right, man Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: still not right, man Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: still not right, man Posted by: WyrdSister
» missing the point Posted by: mazel
you quite missed the point
Posted by: mwildfire on Oct 7, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, there was plenty of discussion on ALTERNET, and similar aites, about the torture bill--but the mainstream media barely mentioned it. My paranoid boyfriend actually speculates that the Republicans outed Foley, to preempt discussion of Congress having passed a bill that, in effect, suspends the Constitution. Every Member of Congress swore to uphold that Constitution and defend it against all enemies foreign and domestic--and two thirds of them stand in dereliction of duty for that now. For this, they should not be voted out of office--they should be tossed out immediately and perhaps tried for treason.
My son at sixteen could have handled dirty messages from a sleazy Congressman without help from adults, and so could most. Not that Foley's antics are insufficient grounds to get rid of him, not that this kind of thing should be tolerated, but it's minor compared to what happened around the same time that the media devoted 1/100th of the time to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you quite missed the point Posted by: WyrdSister
» very consistent Posted by: edith
asleep at the wheel? virulent new strains of violent jihadists?
Posted by: dragonfly on Oct 7, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Proof, once again, that 9/11 happened because the Bush Administration was asleep at the wheel."

9/11 did not happen because the Bush Syndicate "was asleep at the wheel". They were no more asleep at the wheel than you are. They planned, and executed 9/11 just as you planned and executed yet another sly propaganda piece exposing some minor gaffs while always, always supporting the official story that 9/11 happened because "they were asleep at the wheel" and nasty Muslim terrorists hate our freedom (watch Loose Change II to see why the twin towers really collapsed).

"But the war in Iraq, and the war in Afghanistan, go on and on and on, like toxic Energizer Bunnies killing and maiming, laying waste to the landscape and breeding virulent new strains of violent jihadists."

And again, falling into lock step with the official story that the Iraq war is creating "virulent new strains of violent jihadists", so when the second edition of 9/11 is executed by the Bush Syndicate they will be able to scapegoat the Muslims, and with help from propaganda like yours the U$ sheep will believe it because after all - we created these "nasty Muslim terrorists" by invading Iraq and now they are getting back at us. We're not creating "virulent new strains of violent jihadists" - what racist pap - we're just creating millions upon millions of humans who hate americans, in addition to lots of bad karma (what ye sow - so shall ye reap).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Muslim Terrorists don't exist.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Muslim Terrorists don't exist.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» do the research Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: do the research Posted by: Conservasaurus
Blame the Lying Corporate News then!
Posted by: hot_rad_man on Oct 7, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put blame where it belongs, on the worst enemy American's have had for the past few years! The scum bags that give us our news on TV, Newspapers and magazines. If they have a large circulation you can figure they owe their soul to some rich conglomerate somewhere and you will not be getting anything worthwhile to judge candidates. That is why you must not vote anymore. The party that wins will steal the election anyway in spite of your vote. They all lie too, and you will never know what mischief they will do till it is too late! Fox News is the greatest enemy and if you watch that you are doomed to stupidity on events shaping our world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LOL, and DUH-uh...Sex always a good distraction
Posted by: Bozwell on Oct 7, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country is so sexually dysfunctional in so many ways and such gets played over and over but SEX SELLS and used as the PREMIER marketing tool ...used for distraction tactical as well and in some ways, can't helpf but figure the WH folks are somewhat RELIEVED that this THE MAIN TOPIC rather than such as details from Woodys book or realities from IRaq or elsewhere in the world...gives them a smidgeoun of breathing room to wonk out another manipulative in their ongong marketing plan to sell the Bush Brigade and obfusicate/hide the facts of their streaming blunders, bumbles and bungles of their six year plus reign....LOL too, the Gops complaining over the sexual contextuals when THEY brought upon ALL that Presidential penis during the Clinton reign (which helped to solidify the BJ concept as being a means of preserving virginity status yet allowing pleasureables to be had by all in the teen population as became a common nightly newshour and alltoher media hour topic of constant chatterings that few could avoid as the GOP attempted their best to remove a dreaded Dem .....) GET A GRIP FOLKS, this cycle will pass as well but unfortunately, the others messes will have long/far reaching consequences no matter how ignorred nor packaged to be sold/foisted off on us ALL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This story is more palatable to the media than a few others.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 7, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story doesn't really affect US policy. There are a couple of other stories that aren't being followed.

The most glaring one is North Korea's nuclear weapons program. This isn't getting any play because what North Korea has done is far worse than anything Iran has done - can you imagine what would happen if Iran claimed that they were in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon and were going to test one?

Bush would use that as a pretext for aerial bombing on the day that it was announced! North Korea gets away with it? Now why is that? Oh yes - no giant oilfields in North Korea.

Now, CNN did cover this story, in a gentle and understanding manner, featuring Rice "It would be a very provocative act" and Bolton, who called (for the first time ever) for a diplomatic solution. They ended on this note: North Korea may be bluffing for political advantage.

Apparently Foley's sexual proclivities are a far more palatable topic than Bush's hypocritical, deceptive and dishonest stnace on nuclear disarmament. No corporate news outlet will compare the nuclear programs of the US to those of Iran, Israel and North Korea. Forbidden topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong Posted by: xi_people
» Very Wrong Posted by: Conservasaurus
on the mark
Posted by: Gregor on Oct 7, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An article that really will get the point. If you think the rich and powerful aren't obsessed with sex you would be wrong. My friend cleans houses for the "rich and powerful" and she said they have so many sex toys it is incredible. What else do these people have to do? They don't clean their own homes, do their own laundry, they just have time to plot and screw...Usually everyone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh my
Posted by: hangman on Oct 7, 2006 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh me , Oh my, its that Sexxxx thing again . Run, run with it . It 'll distract everyone from whats going on.

Peeennisses. bunch of pricks always screwing with people, one way or another. oops thats politicians.

it is disgusting that they even put a predator in charge of missing and exploited children.

may the Repugnant-clan house fall down go flat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

grammar
Posted by: mallamv on Oct 7, 2006 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about better editing of the text. Typos and syntax could be eliminated with a little care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: grammar Posted by: PrestonB3
» RE: grammar Posted by: Lincoln fan
I love you
Posted by: Rin Daemoko on Oct 7, 2006 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only am I thrilled that someone else has said it, I'm thrilled that it has made it to the front page (of this site, at least). I've been saying it for years - politics is one big penis contest. Women don't have penis envy, men do.

What was one of the incentives to invade Iraq? The Bushies' penises weren't oily enough. They needed more oil. Why pour billions of dollars into the military when it's needed for medicine and education? Because they want bigger penises, that make bigger explosions, that do +9 damage for great justice!

Even if they don't consciously think it, the penis dominates them and their thinking. It's like their unconscious minds have twisted their penis envy into every conceivable facet of life from abortion, to same-sex marriage, to stem-cell research, to war, to domination in general.

And it's not only in America. A few months ago, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper stood before a press conference to declare how he had beefed up the Canadian military. His speech and its purpose was essentially this: "LOOK AT MAH PENIS! YOU ALL HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE MAH PENIS NOW! HA! HA! PENIS!"

Most of the time, I am ashamed to be male.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mrsjinny
Posted by: dennis defoggi on Oct 7, 2006 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Penises????!!!! I thought it was a*#holes....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You got that right
Posted by: popsicle67 on Oct 7, 2006 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bunch of DICKS, that is who runs the country. You know it is the democrats fault we are in this mess. If they had the sense that a sugar glider was born with they would have clammered to get Clinton impeached so that Gore would have been an incumbant in 2000 and the republicans would have had to come up with someone better than the big DICK with ears in the White House and that wrinkled foreskin of vice president. You hear me you dreadlock wearing , potsmoking, treehugging, bunny groping little weasels, IT'S YOUR FAULT, FIX IT!!!!!!!! And please, find somebody that isn't in the political limelight right now to run. The current crop of possibilities is enough to make me want to move to Mexico, at least there you can protest your president without being called a terrorist sympathizer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please spellcheck your article
Posted by: PrestonB3 on Oct 7, 2006 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the 'Net and all, but the article could stand to be run through a spell-checker and a grammar checker as well if possible prior to posting. I'm certain most word-processing programs have that function as standard. I did agree with most of the content of what you said though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You didn't read my comment! I agree!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 7, 2006 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, there are a lot of nuclear states now - the US, Britain, France, Russia, China, Israel, Pakistan, India, North Korea, South Africa, and Iran.

I'm sure I'm missing someone.

If Iran has a nuclear power and weapons program, why is that a greater threat than North Korea? What if Iran had a ballistic missle program?

Speaking of which, the greatest current destabilizing proposal is to put conventional explosives on top of ballisitic missles for an assault on Iran. The Russians say they won't be able to tell the difference between a nuclear attack, and that they might respond some savage manner.

Yup.
Experts warn of an accidental atomic war; Nuclear missile modified for conventional attack on Iran could set off alarm in Russia

Eric Rosenberg, Hearst Newspapers
Friday, October 6, 2006


Even the corporate media is starting to worry about Dr. Strangelove.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Grand Old Pervert Party" ( a cartoon )
Posted by: what now cartoons on Oct 8, 2006 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Grand Old Pervert Party ( a new cartoon)
When I saw the Fox news picture of Foley, with a (D)below his face, and then the Right Wing Blogs that were brought to my attention by www.democraticwarrior.com , my blood started to boil. Damn these Lies and lying liars. I've had enough of this disinformation. That's why I tackled these Family Values hypocrites in my latest toon. Including the lies from Fox news that Foley was a Democrat! (arggg)! It's my hope that these brainwashed Family Value Voters will wake up and see the light, and either vote these monsters out of office or stay home hiding in shame over the fact that they decided to vote for someone over a few crummy slogans.
to see my Folly GOP cartoon, go to my website
www.whatnowtoons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlterNet as Left Gatekeeper
Posted by: LeftWright on Oct 8, 2006 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This weekend's headline story on AlterNet is this pathetic tabloid titled swipe at the attention span of the American people.

Instead of putting a headline story about Ms. Rice's obvious lies and clear foreknowledge of 9/11 OR the death of Habeas Corpus in the U.S., AlterNet runs this lame "article." Amazing! Brilliant!

Where is the story "Rice Lied About 9/11 Foreknowledge"? Where are the calls for her immediate resignation and a full and complete investigation into the Bush/Cheney role in 9/11?

Stone silence.

Well done, AlterNet

Keep snorting that Schumann money and gatekeeping on the left.

The revolution will not be televised, nor reported on here.

But, it will happen, never-the-less.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Story should be: "Rice Needs to Explain 9/11 Foreknowledge"
Posted by: LeftWright on Oct 8, 2006 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The evidence is now clear and incontrovertible, a brief summary:

National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice consistently sat on information that warned of the coming "attacks" that occurred on September 11, 2001. And, she has just as consistently denied doing so.

In the days following the attacks she claimed that "no one could have guessed" that planes could be used as weapons against buildings. Before the 9/11 Commission she stated that the "kind of analysis about the use of planes as weapons actually was never briefed to us." She then testifies that "in fact there were some reports done in '98 and '99. I think I was -- I was certainly not aware of them..."

However, Ms. Rice must have known about the extraordinary security measures taken at the July, 2001 G-8 Summit meeting in Genoa, Italy. These precautions included an air exclusion zone and anti-aircraft missiles to guard against a possible terrorist attack on the meeting attended by herself and Mr. Bush.

We now know that Ms. Rice was briefed by Mr. Tenet and others on July 10, 2001 about the looming threat from al-Qaeda. A meeting she neglected to mention to the 9/11 Commission and claims to have forgotten about until State Department records confirmed it took place.

Add to this the now infamous Presidential Daily Brief of August 6, 2001 entitled "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US," and all excuses for inaction become totally implausible and completely unbelievable.

Unless.......

She was facilitating the 9/11 attacks.

Once again, the "conspiracy theory" that best explains all the facts is the one that includes all the facts.

Or did Mr. bin Laden drug her into incompetence, inaction and memory loss?

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» TROLL ALERT! Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» tc = mindless character assassin Posted by: LeftWright
» LW = paid propaganda artist Posted by: thoughtcriminal
NO FREE LUNCH in the Foley scandal:
Posted by: jeffbossler on Oct 8, 2006 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Foley scandal IS NO FREE LUNCH, or is it the "October surprise!" The Republicans will pull rabbits out of their hat, and we will once again sit sheepish on the sidelines still pointing fingers at Foley after the fact of another stolen election, and possibly the “real October surprise” that Bush so desperately needs.

Let’s not kid ourselves; we have enough work to do without pointing fingers at the Republicans, and unfortunately, I know too many Democrats who won’t hold their nose and vote as I will. They just simply won’t vote, and here are just a few reasons why.

COWARDESS: To sail in the breeze of Republican failures and scandals isn’t good enough. It is cowardly to rely on the failures of others for our own benefit! Cowardly actions generate apathy within our own constituency on the street and fuel our oppositions’ one-liners.

CREDIBILITY: While we are able to point out the Republicans’ transgressions, we have not succeeded nor have we honestly tried, to bring justice to those who blatantly violate the law, which includes the president. Unless we stop this regime dead in its tracks and hold it accountable on a legal basis, then we are accomplices in the crime!

NAIVITE IN THE NUMBERS GAME: A simple majority of just a few seats is NOT A MESSAGE: Whether “stay the course” is a good or bad strategy isn’t the issue. The issue is that we Democrats don’t have a simple slogan (not to mention an agreed upon strategy) for an Iraq exit plan.

REFRAME MORAL VALUES AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY: Instead of flogging Foley for his human transgressions, we should be focusing on stating clearly our moral values. Now more than ever, we have an opportunity to capture the imaginations of those Republicans and cross-over voters who are questioning the morality of war, and the “moral authority” of our nation. Additionally, moral values are also the perfect segue into the fiscal responsibility issue. Both these issues were botched big-time by the Kerry campaign, and they are simply being ignored this time around. This in itself may be our biggest failing relative to “winning” this November.

FEAR OF BEING LABELED “UN-PATRIOTIC”: To see the opposition to the Bush regime in the House and Senate wither away upon the first suggestion of being labeled “unpatriotic” is the entire testament most Democrats need to realize that our representatives indeed lack true patriotism!

The latest example of egregious incompetence and lack of conviction displayed by the Democrats was the vote on the prisoner detainee bill. The simple fact that we even “participated” in a vote to dilute and “compromise” the Geneva Conventions is a heinous act. To participate in this crime, EVEN TO VOTE NO, defies any form of common morality. If our Democratic representatives in the House and Senate can’t find their backbone and fight with conviction and truth, then we are complicit in the crime.

PS: Unless we want to change our Party mascot to a Poodle, we’d better be making a loud noise and kicking like a real Donkey!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOLY FUCKING SHIT_N KOREA JUST SET OFF A NUKE!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 8, 2006 9:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sure hope you view this as a more important topic then the sexual meanderings of Foley. We are turning the world into a nuclear timebomb. This ungodly bullshit has to stop now!

Wake the fuck up, for the love of God!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PS stay calm and be rational Posted by: thoughtcriminal