Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

White-Collar Workers Unite!

By Rina Palta, AlterNet. Posted October 10, 2006.


Barbara Ehrenreich's new organization seeks better health care, insurance and debt relief for unemployed and underemployed professionals.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Rina Palta

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Were you recently laid off from what should have been a cushy office job? Did you mistakenly think your college education would guarantee a decent financial future? Do you pass the twilight hours looking for new ways to say “database skills” on your Monster.com resume, only to wake up in a pool of instant coffee and crumpled rejection letters? Barbara Ehrenreich wants you to know that you are not alone!

Which is why on Sept. 15, she launched United Professionals, a nonprofit networking agency for “unemployed, underemployed, and anxiously employed” white-collar workers. Which encompasses pretty much anyone in America’s distressed middle class, but specifically hopes to draw from two major groups: “One,” says Ehrenreich, “is the 20-somethings who come out of college with an average of $20,000 in debt and are stuck in low-wage jobs. And this is not what they expected with a college degree. The other group is people in their late 40s and beyond who find that they are suddenly judged as too old to be in the work force.”

The idea for the organization grew out of the research for her latest book, "Bait and Switch." Ehrenreich, intending to covertly enter and expose the degrading and volatile world of corporate employment, spent nearly a year searching for a job through websites, networking events, career coaches, only to discover it was worse than she thought. Even with a jazzed PR resume and phenomenal writing skills -- she was recently asked to fill in for New York Times op-ed columnist Thomas Friedman -- Ehrenreich couldn’t land a cubicle.

Moreover, the ‘networking’ events she attended -- events that were supposed to provide depressed and disengaged employment-seekers with a rare opportunity for community -- often ended up being fronts for expensive career classes and sometimes even Christian evangelism. “People in this situation really want to come together, but when they do so often it ends up being some sort of very exploitative or useless situation,” she says.

When workers started turning up en masse at her "Bait and Switch" book tour events to share their stories, an idea was born.

“I would say, ‘Well, here we all are,” recounts Ehrenreich. “‘Is there someone here who would like to collect email addresses with the view to eventually doing something?’” So I had these contacts then in a number of cities, and then they had each collected email addresses, and it was out of that the initial group formed.”

She approached her friend Mike Dolan at the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for advice, asking him, “What kind of an organization would work for these people? And no, it’s not a union, because we’re talking about many occupations and places. People who are unemployed as well as employed.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: labor, workforce, class

Rina Palta is a freelance writer based in San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nice start
Posted by: Temporary on Oct 10, 2006 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good! Lets just hope this doesent turn to into one of those immigrant bitching movements

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice bitiching Posted by: edith
» RE: Nice bitiching Posted by: Leman
» ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red
good
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 10, 2006 1:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A really good idea. If our corporations and governments were working for all instead of just for the selfish rich, we wouldn't have all these awful decency-threatening and financially-threatening problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A no problem world? Posted by: edith
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Leman
» I'll retrain and get another one. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» You better be under 40. Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world? Posted by: rsaxto
great idea
Posted by: philame on Oct 10, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really hope this grows

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barbara
Posted by: karyse on Oct 10, 2006 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Barbara,
I love all of your books, and thouroughly enjoy reading everything you write.

It seems that you are reinventing the wheel here. What do you mean "it's not [can't be] a union" because they work in all different industries or are unemployed? What about the IWW (International Workers of the World)? Why not reinvigorate falling union numbers instead of starting from scrratch? The only criteria for membership in the IWW is that one is or has been a wage earner. Yes, you can be a member if you are unemployed (and at a very low rate). Is it that unemployed "professionals" are loathe to associate with us blue collar (or lower) working stiffs?

Is it because most white collar workers are so inculcated with the ideology of the "bosses" that anything as radical as a union sends them running for a cappuccino?

Just a thought. Fragmentation of workers has always worked in favor of the monied classes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» simple Posted by: cdtomei
» RE: Barbara Posted by: kmarx
Not a union.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 10, 2006 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it’s not a union, because we’re talking about many occupations and places.

The big problem with this white collae organization is that it's not a union. It will have no clout. When the unions speak there is always the implied threat of a strike. This threat is stronger or weaker depending on the labor market but it's always there.

Again although they are trying to be inclusive they are shunning the majority of people because they're breaking off the white collar workers from the rest of society.

These disadvantages can be overcome simply by not having an organization. By enlisting all citizens to act independently in their own best interests the most common interests will prevail. The one common threat we can make to our government is the refusal to support a political party that doesn't represent us.

The Lincoln Initiative is a movement, not an organization, that uses the tactics of the labor unions to make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Join today. It costs nothing and will only take a few minutes of your time.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not a union. Posted by: Leman
» RE: Not a union. Posted by: Lincoln fan
Get it started ASAP
Posted by: DougScott on Oct 10, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After the GOP and Dems on Capitol Hill passed so-called "free" trade agreements, middleclass Americans and the working poor need all the help they can get.

Luckily I'm retired with Medicare, but my kids and grandchildren aren't. Their future looks lousy after being sold down the NAFTA Super Highway by bipartisan pigs at Dub-ya's "Let 'em eat cake" trough.

Try to keep smiling everyone, Doug

PS: For enlightenment and entertainment, visit a really cool website with over 70 Bushwacking cartoons and illlustrations: www.King-George.biz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

great idea but...
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 10, 2006 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is long overdue idea but the elite will never stand for it, if it gains momentum, as long as it is not in the mainstream they willbe fine with it. Face it if you are not a CEO in America then no one cares what you make...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate culture is awful - get out of it by any means necessary
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 10, 2006 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate system should be rejected as it now stands, period.

The current setup is for one reason only: to shield the upper echelon of owners from legal responsibility for the actions they take through the businesses they own. It's a cut-out system - that's why Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling went down over Enron, while the majority shareholders in Enron were able to say, tut-tut, our executives were "out of control", and wash their hands of the whole affair - even though the Board certainly supported the approach of Lay and Skilling.

The system is undemocratic and heirarchical - and most corporate employees are saturated in fear and as a result become the most subservient people in society, who spend their time plotting against one another, kissing up to their bosses and abusing their underlings. Most corporate environments are poisonous to basic human dignity; many people survive by 'internalizing the corporate values', but they also tend to have to take a lot of Prozac and other drugs in order to cope with their bleak reality.

There is a good solution, however - take the shareholders out of the equation by setting up corporate structures that are entirely owned by their employees and in which employees get to vote for their immediate bosses, and those bosses get to vote for who runs the overall company (cause you do need someone who can make a decision, at the end of the day, and you want that person to be the best one possible - meaning that they should be appointed by the employees who know the companies business best, not by some elitist shareholders).

You might say there is a problem, in that the company will not be able to raise funds by offering shares on the stock exchange. Well - you might as well tell your daughter that she has to make money by turning tricks in the red light district - business is tough, you've gotta sell yourself to raise capital - that's the name of the game. Bull!

Here's a good bumpersticker: "Corporate Culture Stinks"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How many are doing something useful?
Posted by: auntiegrav on Oct 10, 2006 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the Net Creativity of these people who are out of jobs? How many are trying to simply get 'work' where they don't do anything useful for humanity, and yet they expect free health care and benefits and a place to sit for 8 hours a day 'increasing productivity' of the current state of affairs. The current state of affairs includes millions of people wasting resources and not creating anything useful for the children of the future. The premise that people who have a degree or other qualifications are 'good' people that are being exploited is fine as long as you realize they have done their share of exploiting of the lower class, the usury system of money, and the environment with their 'middle-upper' class lifestyles. What makes another group so important? The whole point to being white collar is to be an individual who can 'compete' for a job. If the jobs they were all trained for are gone due to overeducating and overinvestment in management and desk jobs, why aren't they simply joining the blue collar unions and getting work? I'll tell you why. It's because they have been telling all the blue collar workers to go to hell and vote for Free Trade and Fair Trade practices that eliminated their jobs and destroyed local economies.
If you want change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is your vote and this isn't even the beginning of the collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The college RACKET is a BIG part of the problem
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Oct 10, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mentioned only in passing here. Overpriced, and 'everyone' goes to college because 'everyone else' goes to college -- a never-ending treadmill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, but you can't get off it. Posted by: medstudgeek
Dividing working America
Posted by: eaanders on Oct 13, 2006 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic Party lost its way when its leadership became part of the investor class that loves Bush's tax cuts on capital gains and dividends and his sanctioning of illegal workers to do their gardening, housecleaning, and nanny chores. They stood by and watched jobs of blue collar workers oursourced and their wages driven down illegal foreign workers.

Now that white collar workers are the next group to see the results of this trend, progressives feel the need to organize, but only white collar workers. What's next, an organization for poor doctors and lawyers or the poor rich who have to pay inheritance taxes?

This splitering of worker power favors the very forces it is trying to defeat. What is really needed is a national organization for all workers similar to the AARP, an organization that can lobby for working people, investigate legislation that affects working people and present it clearly in a national magazine, and testify before Congress with the power to demand action on issues of concern to working people.

Blue collar and white collar workers should unite, not divide, or they will surely be conquered. Reclaim the Democratic Party of FDR from the elitists who never look down to see how those below them are doing, but only look up at how those above them got there and keep hoping someday to join them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Talk--Nothin Like The WALK--
Posted by: NeoCogito on Oct 14, 2006 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If The People Like the Right --Then Why Run A "Populist"?

The last so-called "Democrat" to win an election, Bill Clinton ran as an "I Feel Your Pain" populist calling himself a liberal. Why would he publicly proclaim all this populist pretense (and frequently), unless! his expertly polished machine told him that was what the people want. Yeah that was the Talk!-- Nothin Like the WALK! Nope! the people aren't as dumb as conservatives (either old-line, republicans or NeoCons, new democrats) like to think. We don't want "Willy"-Nilly Clintonomics. We understand privatization/deregulation NAFTA, the end of our free press--hurt us! big time.

Hill & Bill's jihad's been against liberals and the left since the 80's when they formed the DLC with Lieberman and some of the most notorious, fabulously wealthy "trash with cash" conservatives of that era. The DLC was founded for the express purpose of undermining and destroying democrats, to remake our democratic process hook or crook, into a one-party republican juggernaut. The Clintons are free market fundamentalists who've done more to undo the democratic progress of a century than any of their conservative brothers & sisters. The Republican orthodoxy (except for a handful of religious fanatics) LOVE! this free mkt fanaticism, and you'll scarcely hear a scintilla of criticism from republicans about the hard right overhaul of America--even from guys like Rush Limbaugh. They Don't Dare!--they'd be shooting themselves in their collective feet; Clintonomics Simply... It's The Right-Wing's Bible.

"Triangulation," the Clintonian technique of betraying the groups that had elected you and the principles on which you were elected, to implement the other, opposition, party's platform

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]