COMMENTS: 56
White-Collar Workers Unite!
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Which is why on Sept. 15, she launched United Professionals, a nonprofit networking agency for “unemployed, underemployed, and anxiously employed†white-collar workers. Which encompasses pretty much anyone in America’s distressed middle class, but specifically hopes to draw from two major groups: “One,†says Ehrenreich, “is the 20-somethings who come out of college with an average of $20,000 in debt and are stuck in low-wage jobs. And this is not what they expected with a college degree. The other group is people in their late 40s and beyond who find that they are suddenly judged as too old to be in the work force.â€
The idea for the organization grew out of the research for her latest book, "Bait and Switch." Ehrenreich, intending to covertly enter and expose the degrading and volatile world of corporate employment, spent nearly a year searching for a job through websites, networking events, career coaches, only to discover it was worse than she thought. Even with a jazzed PR resume and phenomenal writing skills -- she was recently asked to fill in for New York Times op-ed columnist Thomas Friedman -- Ehrenreich couldn’t land a cubicle.
Moreover, the ‘networking’ events she attended -- events that were supposed to provide depressed and disengaged employment-seekers with a rare opportunity for community -- often ended up being fronts for expensive career classes and sometimes even Christian evangelism. “People in this situation really want to come together, but when they do so often it ends up being some sort of very exploitative or useless situation,†she says.
When workers started turning up en masse at her "Bait and Switch" book tour events to share their stories, an idea was born.
“I would say, ‘Well, here we all are,†recounts Ehrenreich. “‘Is there someone here who would like to collect email addresses with the view to eventually doing something?’†So I had these contacts then in a number of cities, and then they had each collected email addresses, and it was out of that the initial group formed.â€
She approached her friend Mike Dolan at the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) for advice, asking him, “What kind of an organization would work for these people? And no, it’s not a union, because we’re talking about many occupations and places. People who are unemployed as well as employed.â€
The result was some seed money from the SEIU and a plan to build a grassroots, membership-based organization with local chapters, modeled vaguely on the AARP. In addition to Mike Dolan of the SEIU, a number of business and policy people have joined the UP board as members and advisors, including Jared Bernstein of the Economic Policy Institute and author and Demos director Tamara Draut. At $36.50 a year for members, UP hopes to be self-funding.
UP has three immediate goals: universal health care, recreating unemployment insurance -- for which “currently only about a third of laid-off people even qualify†-- and alleviating debt through a fairness in lending campaign. Though it does not plan on becoming a health coverage provider, UP is currently developing a plan to offer affordable service through a similar system as the Freelancer’s Union, which has managed to score group rates for self-employed workers living in New York.
In the long term, Ehrenreich and UP hope to tackle the greater issue of corporate oversight and accountability, “so that they can’t just lay off people or suspend pension and health benefits without some kind of review, some kind of public process,†Ehrenreich says. The trouble, of course, is finding an effective mechanism, which in UP’s case is envisioned as a sort of organic, from-the-ground-up civil rights movement:
“My model here is always the women’s movement in the 1970s, when there really was a lot of shame connected with having been raped or sexually abused in any way. And we had to come together for women to say, ‘Ah, that happened to me, too.’ And to begin to understand they didn’t cause it. There is a certain parallel where the unemployed are made to feel ashamed because of injuries inflicted on them. And the only way to get past shame is to come together and you know, reinforce each other.â€
Hence the greater mission of UP, which does not seek to merely prop up an economic system that they think fails to adequately reward white- and blue-collar workers, but to form a voting bloc, or at least a coalition of interests. “It’s not just a matter for the poor, the chronically poor,†Ehrenreich explains. “The insecurity and instability of the middle class is part of the picture and we want those middle-class people to see that things like universal health insurance and a better safety net are in their immediate self-interest. I think we can build a majority movement for economic justice in this country."
Lofty ambitions, surely, but they seem to be resonating with a number of people. Two weeks after launch of the organization’s website, over a hundred people had volunteered to start local chapters in their towns.
“It’s a beginning, an experiment,†says Ehrenreich. “We’ll see what happens.â€
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Temporary on Oct 10, 2006 12:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nice bitiching
Posted by: edith
» RE: Nice bitiching
Posted by: Leman
» ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 10, 2006 1:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A no problem world?
Posted by: edith
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» No wonder you sleep well at night
Posted by: baugh
» RE: No wonder you sleep well at night
Posted by: Leman
» I'll retrain and get another one.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» You better be under 40.
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: I'll retrain and get another one.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» what should the govt and corporations do?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: rsaxto
Comments are closed-
Posted by: philame on Oct 10, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Oct 10, 2006 3:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love all of your books, and thouroughly enjoy reading everything you write.
It seems that you are reinventing the wheel here. What do you mean "it's not [can't be] a union" because they work in all different industries or are unemployed? What about the IWW (International Workers of the World)? Why not reinvigorate falling union numbers instead of starting from scrratch? The only criteria for membership in the IWW is that one is or has been a wage earner. Yes, you can be a member if you are unemployed (and at a very low rate). Is it that unemployed "professionals" are loathe to associate with us blue collar (or lower) working stiffs?
Is it because most white collar workers are so inculcated with the ideology of the "bosses" that anything as radical as a union sends them running for a cappuccino?
Just a thought. Fragmentation of workers has always worked in favor of the monied classes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» simple
Posted by: cdtomei
» RE: Barbara
Posted by: kmarx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 10, 2006 4:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big problem with this white collae organization is that it's not a union. It will have no clout. When the unions speak there is always the implied threat of a strike. This threat is stronger or weaker depending on the labor market but it's always there.
Again although they are trying to be inclusive they are shunning the majority of people because they're breaking off the white collar workers from the rest of society.
These disadvantages can be overcome simply by not having an organization. By enlisting all citizens to act independently in their own best interests the most common interests will prevail. The one common threat we can make to our government is the refusal to support a political party that doesn't represent us.
The Lincoln Initiative is a movement, not an organization, that uses the tactics of the labor unions to make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Join today. It costs nothing and will only take a few minutes of your time.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not a union.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: Not a union.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Not a union., but it's better than nothing.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Not a union., but it's better than nothing.
Posted by: Leman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DougScott on Oct 10, 2006 5:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luckily I'm retired with Medicare, but my kids and grandchildren aren't. Their future looks lousy after being sold down the NAFTA Super Highway by bipartisan pigs at Dub-ya's "Let 'em eat cake" trough.
Try to keep smiling everyone, Doug
PS: For enlightenment and entertainment, visit a really cool website with over 70 Bushwacking cartoons and illlustrations: www.King-George.biz
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 10, 2006 8:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 10, 2006 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current setup is for one reason only: to shield the upper echelon of owners from legal responsibility for the actions they take through the businesses they own. It's a cut-out system - that's why Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling went down over Enron, while the majority shareholders in Enron were able to say, tut-tut, our executives were "out of control", and wash their hands of the whole affair - even though the Board certainly supported the approach of Lay and Skilling.
The system is undemocratic and heirarchical - and most corporate employees are saturated in fear and as a result become the most subservient people in society, who spend their time plotting against one another, kissing up to their bosses and abusing their underlings. Most corporate environments are poisonous to basic human dignity; many people survive by 'internalizing the corporate values', but they also tend to have to take a lot of Prozac and other drugs in order to cope with their bleak reality.
There is a good solution, however - take the shareholders out of the equation by setting up corporate structures that are entirely owned by their employees and in which employees get to vote for their immediate bosses, and those bosses get to vote for who runs the overall company (cause you do need someone who can make a decision, at the end of the day, and you want that person to be the best one possible - meaning that they should be appointed by the employees who know the companies business best, not by some elitist shareholders).
You might say there is a problem, in that the company will not be able to raise funds by offering shares on the stock exchange. Well - you might as well tell your daughter that she has to make money by turning tricks in the red light district - business is tough, you've gotta sell yourself to raise capital - that's the name of the game. Bull!
Here's a good bumpersticker: "Corporate Culture Stinks"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate culture is awful - get out of it by any means necessary: easier said than done
Posted by: medstudgeek
Comments are closed-
Posted by: auntiegrav on Oct 10, 2006 11:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is your vote and this isn't even the beginning of the collapse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Oct 10, 2006 1:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, but you can't get off it.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Yes, but you can't get off it.
Posted by: Leman
» We Don't Know What Our Dollars Purchase
Posted by: edith
» It is your responsibility to know what you are paying for
Posted by: Leman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eaanders on Oct 13, 2006 10:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that white collar workers are the next group to see the results of this trend, progressives feel the need to organize, but only white collar workers. What's next, an organization for poor doctors and lawyers or the poor rich who have to pay inheritance taxes?
This splitering of worker power favors the very forces it is trying to defeat. What is really needed is a national organization for all workers similar to the AARP, an organization that can lobby for working people, investigate legislation that affects working people and present it clearly in a national magazine, and testify before Congress with the power to demand action on issues of concern to working people.
Blue collar and white collar workers should unite, not divide, or they will surely be conquered. Reclaim the Democratic Party of FDR from the elitists who never look down to see how those below them are doing, but only look up at how those above them got there and keep hoping someday to join them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NeoCogito on Oct 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last so-called "Democrat" to win an election, Bill Clinton ran as an "I Feel Your Pain" populist calling himself a liberal. Why would he publicly proclaim all this populist pretense (and frequently), unless! his expertly polished machine told him that was what the people want. Yeah that was the Talk!-- Nothin Like the WALK! Nope! the people aren't as dumb as conservatives (either old-line, republicans or NeoCons, new democrats) like to think. We don't want "Willy"-Nilly Clintonomics. We understand privatization/deregulation NAFTA, the end of our free press--hurt us! big time.
Hill & Bill's jihad's been against liberals and the left since the 80's when they formed the DLC with Lieberman and some of the most notorious, fabulously wealthy "trash with cash" conservatives of that era. The DLC was founded for the express purpose of undermining and destroying democrats, to remake our democratic process hook or crook, into a one-party republican juggernaut. The Clintons are free market fundamentalists who've done more to undo the democratic progress of a century than any of their conservative brothers & sisters. The Republican orthodoxy (except for a handful of religious fanatics) LOVE! this free mkt fanaticism, and you'll scarcely hear a scintilla of criticism from republicans about the hard right overhaul of America--even from guys like Rush Limbaugh. They Don't Dare!--they'd be shooting themselves in their collective feet; Clintonomics Simply... It's The Right-Wing's Bible.
"Triangulation," the Clintonian technique of betraying the groups that had elected you and the principles on which you were elected, to implement the other, opposition, party's platform
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Temporary on Oct 10, 2006 12:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nice bitiching
Posted by: edith
» RE: Nice bitiching
Posted by: Leman
» ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Leman
» RE: ehrenreich is another pro-immigration, "one world" fakeLeftist
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 10, 2006 1:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A no problem world?
Posted by: edith
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: Let's just let corporations be free to do whatever they want.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» No wonder you sleep well at night
Posted by: baugh
» RE: No wonder you sleep well at night
Posted by: Leman
» I'll retrain and get another one.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» You better be under 40.
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: I'll retrain and get another one.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: Leman
» what should the govt and corporations do?
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: A no problem world?
Posted by: rsaxto
Comments are closed-
Posted by: philame on Oct 10, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Oct 10, 2006 3:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love all of your books, and thouroughly enjoy reading everything you write.
It seems that you are reinventing the wheel here. What do you mean "it's not [can't be] a union" because they work in all different industries or are unemployed? What about the IWW (International Workers of the World)? Why not reinvigorate falling union numbers instead of starting from scrratch? The only criteria for membership in the IWW is that one is or has been a wage earner. Yes, you can be a member if you are unemployed (and at a very low rate). Is it that unemployed "professionals" are loathe to associate with us blue collar (or lower) working stiffs?
Is it because most white collar workers are so inculcated with the ideology of the "bosses" that anything as radical as a union sends them running for a cappuccino?
Just a thought. Fragmentation of workers has always worked in favor of the monied classes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» simple
Posted by: cdtomei
» RE: Barbara
Posted by: kmarx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 10, 2006 4:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big problem with this white collae organization is that it's not a union. It will have no clout. When the unions speak there is always the implied threat of a strike. This threat is stronger or weaker depending on the labor market but it's always there.
Again although they are trying to be inclusive they are shunning the majority of people because they're breaking off the white collar workers from the rest of society.
These disadvantages can be overcome simply by not having an organization. By enlisting all citizens to act independently in their own best interests the most common interests will prevail. The one common threat we can make to our government is the refusal to support a political party that doesn't represent us.
The Lincoln Initiative is a movement, not an organization, that uses the tactics of the labor unions to make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Join today. It costs nothing and will only take a few minutes of your time.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not a union.
Posted by: Leman
» RE: Not a union.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Not a union., but it's better than nothing.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Not a union., but it's better than nothing.
Posted by: Leman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DougScott on Oct 10, 2006 5:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luckily I'm retired with Medicare, but my kids and grandchildren aren't. Their future looks lousy after being sold down the NAFTA Super Highway by bipartisan pigs at Dub-ya's "Let 'em eat cake" trough.
Try to keep smiling everyone, Doug
PS: For enlightenment and entertainment, visit a really cool website with over 70 Bushwacking cartoons and illlustrations: www.King-George.biz
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 10, 2006 8:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 10, 2006 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current setup is for one reason only: to shield the upper echelon of owners from legal responsibility for the actions they take through the businesses they own. It's a cut-out system - that's why Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling went down over Enron, while the majority shareholders in Enron were able to say, tut-tut, our executives were "out of control", and wash their hands of the whole affair - even though the Board certainly supported the approach of Lay and Skilling.
The system is undemocratic and heirarchical - and most corporate employees are saturated in fear and as a result become the most subservient people in society, who spend their time plotting against one another, kissing up to their bosses and abusing their underlings. Most corporate environments are poisonous to basic human dignity; many people survive by 'internalizing the corporate values', but they also tend to have to take a lot of Prozac and other drugs in order to cope with their bleak reality.
There is a good solution, however - take the shareholders out of the equation by setting up corporate structures that are entirely owned by their employees and in which employees get to vote for their immediate bosses, and those bosses get to vote for who runs the overall company (cause you do need someone who can make a decision, at the end of the day, and you want that person to be the best one possible - meaning that they should be appointed by the employees who know the companies business best, not by some elitist shareholders).
You might say there is a problem, in that the company will not be able to raise funds by offering shares on the stock exchange. Well - you might as well tell your daughter that she has to make money by turning tricks in the red light district - business is tough, you've gotta sell yourself to raise capital - that's the name of the game. Bull!
Here's a good bumpersticker: "Corporate Culture Stinks"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate culture is awful - get out of it by any means necessary: easier said than done
Posted by: medstudgeek
Comments are closed-
Posted by: auntiegrav on Oct 10, 2006 11:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is your vote and this isn't even the beginning of the collapse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Oct 10, 2006 1:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, but you can't get off it.
Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Yes, but you can't get off it.
Posted by: Leman
» We Don't Know What Our Dollars Purchase
Posted by: edith
» It is your responsibility to know what you are paying for
Posted by: Leman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eaanders on Oct 13, 2006 10:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that white collar workers are the next group to see the results of this trend, progressives feel the need to organize, but only white collar workers. What's next, an organization for poor doctors and lawyers or the poor rich who have to pay inheritance taxes?
This splitering of worker power favors the very forces it is trying to defeat. What is really needed is a national organization for all workers similar to the AARP, an organization that can lobby for working people, investigate legislation that affects working people and present it clearly in a national magazine, and testify before Congress with the power to demand action on issues of concern to working people.
Blue collar and white collar workers should unite, not divide, or they will surely be conquered. Reclaim the Democratic Party of FDR from the elitists who never look down to see how those below them are doing, but only look up at how those above them got there and keep hoping someday to join them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NeoCogito on Oct 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last so-called "Democrat" to win an election, Bill Clinton ran as an "I Feel Your Pain" populist calling himself a liberal. Why would he publicly proclaim all this populist pretense (and frequently), unless! his expertly polished machine told him that was what the people want. Yeah that was the Talk!-- Nothin Like the WALK! Nope! the people aren't as dumb as conservatives (either old-line, republicans or NeoCons, new democrats) like to think. We don't want "Willy"-Nilly Clintonomics. We understand privatization/deregulation NAFTA, the end of our free press--hurt us! big time.
Hill & Bill's jihad's been against liberals and the left since the 80's when they formed the DLC with Lieberman and some of the most notorious, fabulously wealthy "trash with cash" conservatives of that era. The DLC was founded for the express purpose of undermining and destroying democrats, to remake our democratic process hook or crook, into a one-party republican juggernaut. The Clintons are free market fundamentalists who've done more to undo the democratic progress of a century than any of their conservative brothers & sisters. The Republican orthodoxy (except for a handful of religious fanatics) LOVE! this free mkt fanaticism, and you'll scarcely hear a scintilla of criticism from republicans about the hard right overhaul of America--even from guys like Rush Limbaugh. They Don't Dare!--they'd be shooting themselves in their collective feet; Clintonomics Simply... It's The Right-Wing's Bible.
"Triangulation," the Clintonian technique of betraying the groups that had elected you and the principles on which you were elected, to implement the other, opposition, party's platform
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




