Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Helen Thomas: Asking Bush the Tough Questions

By Ann McFeatters, Ms. Magazine. Posted October 9, 2006.


Fearless White House correspondent Helen Thomas has covered nine presidents, and says Bush is undoubtedly the worst.
helenbig
Helen Thomas: Asking Bush the Tough Questions

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Ann McFeatters

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It was the talk of the blogosphere: As part of Stephen Colbert's eviscerating roast of President Bush at the annual White House Correspondents' Association Dinner in April -- wonkish Washington's equivalent of the Oscars -- he showed a hilarious video that was supposedly an "audition" for the job of White House press secretary.

His costar in the satiric short: none other than the octogenarian doyenne of White House correspondents, Helen Thomas.

Using actual TV footage of the White House press corps, Colbert (of Comedy Central's Colbert Report) played a putative press secretary at a podium, ridiculing the reporters and avoiding their questions. But when Thomas asks, as she did of President Bush at a March 21 press conference, why we really invaded Iraq, Colbert feigns terror. He runs from the White House with Thomas in slow-but-relentless pursuit, notebook and pen in hand. Inside a parking garage, Colbert presses the emergency intercom to demand help, because "She won't stop asking why we invaded Iraq." The attendant responds, "Why did we invade Iraq?"

Colbert finally escapes and returns to New York City. But there, the be-capped limousine driver turns out to be... Helen Thomas -- who then urges him to "buckle up."

The video is yet another triumphant, iconic moment in the long, impressive life of the pioneering journalist, who turns 86 on August 4. The first woman to be chief White House correspondent for a major news service (United Press International), Thomas has covered every president from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush. In 1998, the White House Correspondents' Association named its lifetime achievement award for her. Yet she's no relic -- working as an opinion columnist for Hearst Newspapers since 2000, she still has her front-row seat at White House press briefings and still shows up daily.

She remains as feisty and fearless as ever. In her new book, Watchdogs of Democracy? The Waning Washington Press Corps and How It Has Failed the Public (Scribner), she takes her colleagues to task for not asking the sort of tough questions she does. "I honestly believe," she writes, "that if reporters had put the spotlight on the flaws in the Bush administration's war policies, they could have saved the country the heartache and the losses of American and Iraqi lives."

Her anti-war, anti-Bush administration views have put her, not surprisingly, in disfavor with the president. In January 2003, she gave a speech at the Society of Professional Journalists' annual awards banquet, in which she offered her regular criticism of his presidency, particularly worrying about his intention to go to war in Iraq. Afterward, a young writer from the Torrance, Calif., Daily Breeze sought her out for an autograph.

"I was flattered. I preened," says Thomas, sheepishly. "I thought I was talking to my new best friend." The young man asked why she seemed sad. "'I should be,'" she recalls answering. "'I'm covering the worst president in Amerian history.'"

The White House was not amused. "I have yet to learn not to talk to reporters. I didn't realize he would quote me," she says now. "Suddenly, I was in the wilderness."

At a presidential press conference two months later, Thomas was not called on for the first time in what reporters believe was more than four decades. She wrote the president to apologize, insisting she did not mean to call him the nation's worst president, and he wrote back to accept. But it wasn't until three years later that she received absolution.

At the March 21 press conference, Bush first complimented her on her "brilliant" performance at a Gridiron Club dinner -- where she sang a song about Hillary Clinton's presidential ambitions while dressed in a Scarlett O'Hara costume à la Carol Burnett (made from green drapes, the dress had a curtain rod running through it). Bush then signaled that he was ready, finally, to take a question from the veteran reporter.

"You're going to be sorry!" Thomas quipped. Bush retorted, "Well, then, let me take it back."

He didn't get a chance to. "Every reason given [for war in Iraq], publicly at least, has turned out not to be true," Thomas admonished, then accused Bush of wanting to invade Iraq "from the moment you stepped into the White House."

"To assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect," Bush responded. "No president wants war. Everything you may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true."

Several months later, Thomas sits in the unnervingly quiet, decorator-designed conference room of Hearst Newspapers despite her professional stature, she works in a cubicle, not a private office). She wears her trademark black pantsuit and red nail polish, her fingers encircled with rings and bracelets lining her arms, her original black hair long-ago dyed bronze brown. Thinking back on her interaction with the president, she only wishes she had pressed him harder.

"The president can't even explain why we are in Iraq," she complains. "And now he wants to take on Iran?"

In her new book -- her fourth -- she writes that the administration signaled for two years that "it could not be deterred from going to war," and that White House reporters knew it. But she thinks the press was caught up in the administration's overly optimistic assessment that leading Iraq to democracy would be easy. "The president wasn't nailed on why we were invading a country of innocent people who had done nothing to us," she says.

Thomas, who is of Lebanese heritage, is outraged at the conduct of the war and the cauldron of hatred she argues it has spawned toward the U.S. in the Middle East. Behind the war, she thinks -- as do many -- is a quest for oil by former oilmen Bush and Vice President Cheney. And she, for one, won't hesitate to keep pounding the administration with questions.

She has now made it her daily job to buttonhole new press secretary Tony Snow, who appears to take her more seriously than did his predecessors, Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan. Snow parries amiably with her. Early in his tenure, he remarked on a handsome apple Thomas was holding, so she handed it to him.

"Whoever thought Helen Thomas would kiss up to me? An apple for the teacher," Snow said as everyone laughed. "Hardly. Hardly," Thomas said hastily, but she, too, smiled broadly.

"He's very smooth. Very slick," she says of Snow. But she insists this White House remains the most secretive she has covered.

And she has many to compare it with. After graduation from Wayne State University in Detroit in 1942, the Kentucky-born, Michigan-raised Thomas made covering the White House her life's work, beginning her signature practice of saying, "Thank you, Mr. President," at the end of every press conference until Bush abolished the custom in 2003.

After her competitor at the Associated Press, Douglas Cornell, retired, they were married in 1971. Their engagement had been announced by First Lady Pat Nixon at a White House party in Cornell's honor. Although he passed away in 1982, Cornell's name still appears on Thomas' phone caller ID. She has lived in the same northwest Washington, D.C., apartment building for years, but she's often on the road, giving speeches or receiving honorary degrees. When addressing students, she presses them to demand honest answers from their public servants. But as intensely provocative as her speeches are, she usually has a ready laugh and kind words for her audiences.

Reaction to Thomas' questioning of the president has played differently, depending on the arena. One woman sent her dozens of roses for questioning the president's motives to his face. But she also was flooded with "venomous, scatological" emails. Conservative talk-show hosts lambasted her for interrupting the president and riding her hobby horse of war and peace. "Will former White House reporter Helen Thomas ever go away?" cried L. Brent Bozell III, president of the conservative Media Research Center.

Not a chance. In her new book -- which excoriates the press corps as docile and incurious -- she argues that reporters never pushed hard enough on administration plans for post-Saddam Hussein Iraq. But she is somewhat hopeful, she says, that the press has since been energized by outrage over the government's inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina and Bush's low poll ratings. She points to more aggressive questioning of the administration's intentions in Iran, and alarm that the United States might find itself in a three-front war.

"I think Americans have been very worried there could be another preemptive strike," Thomas says. "After all, we went to war in Iraq, which was not a threat to us. Isn't it better to talk than start another war? How does bombing people make us safer?"

Here's a question for Thomas: After covering nine presidents, does she believe in her heart that Bush will strike Iran? She pauses and slowly shakes her head. No, she says. It would be "such a folly" for the administration to take military action against Iran. "The president has enough on his plate."

But she vows to continue being in the president's face. "I respect the office of the presidency," she says, "but I never worship at the shrines of our public servants. They owe us the truth. They owe us peace. America should never be a country that starts wars; Iraq has reminded Americans of that. We do not have the right to attack anyone we think is a potential enemy.

"The Washington press corps has the privilege of asking the president of the United States what he is doing and why," she continues. "We don't go into journalism to be popular. It is our job to seek the truth and put constant pressure on our leaders until we get answers. We threw in the towel after 9/11. But I think -- I hope -- we're more skeptical now. The press is coming out of its coma."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media

Ann McFeatters is a Scripps Howard News Service columnist who has covered the White House and national politics since 1986.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
jewel
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 9, 2006 1:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Helen Thomas is America's prime jewel. She speaks the truth to American presidential power better than anyone else. She knows how very wrong the Bushie warmongering regime is. Queen Thomas is in every way superior to King Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jewel Posted by: markusmark
» Jewel? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Jewel? Posted by: Orwells_nightmare
» RE: Jewel? Posted by: Envi
» RE: Jewel? Absolutely yes! Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Jewel? Absolutely yes! Posted by: Knowmad
» Rock . . . Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Jewel? Posted by: Hanlon
» There are no bad ideas Posted by: Knowmad
The Worst President in HISTORY
Posted by: thinkverybig on Oct 9, 2006 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just happened across Keith Olbermann's rant about BUSH and his lies and I think everyone should view and listen to his commentary. It is quite thought provoking, powerful and truthful. Go to Msnbc.com and find Keith Olbermann's commentary about BUSH and his lies and please share it with everyone you know. This message is too powerful for people not to know about it.

I just had to share this with you.


Do forgive me for not being on subject.



Coming soon.... WeMustChange.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Think very big, indeed! Posted by: Tom Degan
HELEN THOMAS! YOU GO, GIRL!!!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 9, 2006 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it amazing that the great Helen Thomas has been relegated to the back row? Is the First Fool stupid enough to believe that he can silence her by such an action? Of course he is. Isn't if funny that there are still so many people who are shocked - Shocked! - when Mrs. Thomas says that George W. Bush is the worst president she's ever covered? (Not to mention the worst president in all American History!)

History will record her as being one of the very few members of the White House Press Corp who wans't asleep at the switch during this disgusting nightmare of an administration. History will remember her as one of the good guys - so to speak. It's nice to know that she's still out there telling truth to power; Holding a mirror to a bunch of hypocritical bastards who don't very much like what's reflected.

Keep up the good fight, Helen! Keep printing the truth! We need you now more than ever. The future of this republic, literally, depends upon people like you.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a sweetie, for sure Posted by: LDavistrueblue
I hope the food's as good as they claim it is at Gitmo.
Posted by: Earthie on Oct 9, 2006 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be a pleasure to meet all the folks that we regular activists admire when they stick us all in the internment camps they're building. Helen Thomas, Keith Olberman, Rhandi Rhodes, Arianna Huffington and many many more. It will be an honor to be locked up with these folks along with everyone else who speaks out against this outrageous administration of jackals and buffoons. Of course it would be a lot cheaper to lock up Bush and his cronies rather than the 67% who disapprove of him. So keep speaking up, everyone, cuz it's economics that drives this country and when enough people see the right way as the cheap way, we'll win in the marketplace. (Aye, aye aye... what a country)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The only problem Posted by: fifthworld
Shame...
Posted by: pcushniesr on Oct 9, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... on Helen Thomas for apologizing to the sub-human Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shame... Posted by: sadforAmerica
» Shame? Posted by: 4sense
THE Valiant Helen Thomas
Posted by: jasimone on Oct 9, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A coward dies a thousand times before his death. The valiant never tastes of death but once."

The inimitable Helen Thomas is perhaps the finest example of bravery in the country today. A true citizen of integrity and honesty, Ms. Thomas relentlessly pursues answers to hard questions many if not most Americans are afraid to ask publicly. Thank you Ms. Thomas for demanding the truth; you shame politicians of both parties; you give hope to those of us who suffer the outrage over the lies and the secrecy from this administration, and its erosion of our historical values. "Apres toi, ?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ah but Posted by: fifthworld
In her case, the female is b*llsier than the male (journalists).
Posted by: InformationPlease on Oct 9, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank YOU, Madame Thomas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Oct 9, 2006 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SOMEBODY needs to ask Bush the tough questions and the rest of the pusillanimous press damn sure ain't going to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She's great but
Posted by: fifthworld on Oct 9, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's platitudes like "worst president ever" that keep the rest asleep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOREIGN FIASCO by BUSH WAS INEVITABLE (04' Post recycled)
Posted by: cognitorex on Oct 9, 2006 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a 'thank you' response from Helen which I adore and treasure. Who else of her stature takes the time to respond to admirers?

"Bush Policies Off Course" Published LTEditor Oct. 04
.
In the 2000 race, Bush admitted that he was deficient with regards to foreign policy. He had no personal or political foreign experience. He did not know the issues or the countries to such a degree as to not know foreign leaders' names or the pronunciation thereof.

He explicitly campaigned that he was a manager. That was his modus operandi as Governor and we should all rest easy. He would assemble good "folks" and they and he in harmonic unity would lead America most well.

The rub one worries about today is not that the majority of Americans now believe the country domestically and Iraq-ily are not "most well," but that the manager has morphed into an autocrat.This nil-experienced folksy guy now dictates, by gut feel, by "God's" will or stubborn adhesion to past policies. Reportedly*, he refuses lengthy briefings. He royally dismisses complex presentations or discussions. And, ultra most certainly, dissenting views and presentations receive no audience and are not acknowledged nor appreciated. (* RonSuskind NYTimes).

If a ship's Captain enters foreign waters with no experience and takes no counsel, continuing catastrophe is certain. You can take that to the Bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Helen Thomas
Posted by: debbie061653@aol.com on Oct 9, 2006 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Helen Thomas, thank you for keeping the "heat" up on this very vile administration. Except you shouldn't have apologized. He IS the worst president in our history, no exceptions! You are a national treasure, and deserve to be given the respect you have earned. And you have a terrific sense of humor to boot! Bless you, and I certainly wish you many more years to "fight". We need you babe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you, Helen Thomas Posted by: don't jolive my olive.
Time to retire
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 9, 2006 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such a joke. The inbred relationship between 'journalists' and 'reporters' and the political ilk is getting so absurd I wonder why anyone listens to these people. She is no 'hero'. She's a reporter! All they like to do is exploit people or situations and then head to the nearest bar and exchange war stories with each other, or, head to the nearest bar and get the inside, leaked information from their government contacts. Then they have their buddy-buddy roasts and awards. And all those books they write, with full compliance of the politicos, who, upon release will feign 'outrage' to gin up sales to their favourite reporter. Its all a joke. Let's all 'dress-up and do skits'. Is this the real world or summer camp? Retire all of those fakers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Poor you...albrechkrause Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Poor you...albrechkrause Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: A REPORTers job is just that... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Time to retire Posted by: don't jolive my olive.
the ones still thinking this is normal politics
Posted by: Gregor on Oct 9, 2006 4:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a few people I run into who think all of this stuff is really just "normal" politics and if we elect someone else in the next election all things will go back to some semblance of "normal". They don't realize how appalling the actions of this administraiton have been and they really don't realize their rights have been taken away. They may or may get affected by it in the future and BOY will they be surprised, because there is no free election in this country any longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who will ask the tough question?
Posted by: bohdan on Oct 9, 2006 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been living in a state of lies ever since Bush assumed the Presidency. Granted all administrations have lied at some level, but the trend in this administration is spreading like a cancerous plague, leaving no one safe from the Republican virus of deceit.

The news media can write articles and voice opinions about how President George W. Bush and his cronies have lied about this and that. (In fact, what took them so long to realize that.) But, this still means nothing. Such revelations of Truth have become the back and forth cackle of gossiping spin masters signifying nothing, as nothing has changed.

Hypocrisy has enjoyed a stable home in the Republican state of mind. Unfortunately it has also cost thousands of innocent lives.

To stop this near psychotic mania the real deal will finally surface when one reporter, that first one, upon being chosen by President Bush to ask a question at one of his press opportunities, stands up and summons the Strength and Courage to ask, " Mr. President, when you lied about...!" Or, at the very least,... “Mr. President, were you lying when you said...?”

That's what it will take --- before the rest of them will do the same. It's time for someone to say that the Emperor has no clothes to his face.

That's also when the evidence for impeachment will be brought forth before the American Public, and that's when it will mean something. Now we only hear the Truth as it is, "...twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools." (Kipling)

Just as Republicans with the help of the media frenzy constantly accused Clinton of lying about his "private life", that "lie" brought the Public into play, so can the Press bring out the Truth in Bush's heirachy. And let's put Bush and Cheney under oath as well. Only then, will the Wisdom of Truth find its place in our great land.

Until then, lying continues to be our government's national pastime. We have come to expect it. We take it for granted. We kill and die for it. And the shadows of sadness remain our constant companions..

--- WHO WILL HAVE THE COURAGE TO ASK FOR THE TRUTH?

the end

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE SPIN-MOLECULE
Posted by: Ullern on Oct 10, 2006 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scientists just announced that they have found the spin-gene, and even narrowed it down to the spin-molecule. That's the spin-gene which can be seen to act in so many of our top-politicians. There may now soon be a cure for those afflicted with the spin-gene, an injection which neutralizes the gene. So far, no known spin-gene carrier have been willing to participate in neutralization tests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If we cannot have compliant media the terrorists win!
Posted by: chriscarlos on Oct 10, 2006 11:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the media has to go into a deep slumber after being hypnotized by Bush and his administration. If we cannot have a media that is compliant, then the terrorists win!

And don't forget, we are still at war, and Bush is our commander and chief. Just forget that most of the evidence for the present Iraq war was not that great.

Or that there were artillery guns in Genoa for the G8 in the summer of 2001 in case a stray airplane were to approach, while then National Security Advisor Rice said in 2002 that we could never have predicted that terrorists would use airplanes as weapons. Please do not ask anything that would make people start asking questions about what is going on and how we got here.

Or how our country in 2000 had a choice for president between two supposedly centrist candidates by the major parties, and how the one that was "selected" has governed as a right wing radical since our country was attacked in 2001. As if 9/11 gave the president the legitimacy to change our government so radically.

Let's stand for a media that obeys the government and the corporate institutions behind it so that we can live in peace.

And don't forget that the Democrats are the party of "cut and run" and former U.S. Representative Gerry Studd was a Democrat who had sex with a teen page in the 1970s, who was censured and who never resigned afterwards. (Just don't mention former Republican U.S. Representative Daniel Crane's affair with a 17 year old in the 1980s. Then it gets close to accurate, and we cannot have that.)

Also, try and use these three terms in the same sentence: Nancy Pelosi, gay pride parade, the North American Man Boy Love Association. Because if we cannot unfairly associate someone with pedophilia and supposed "deviancy" then the terrorists have won!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

grrr...
Posted by: Tasha on Oct 11, 2006 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Helen Thomas rocks. I'm glad to read about her and her drive to ask the hard questions. But why, why. WHY is it that whenever we read about women, and about women in highly visible roles in particular, we always have to be told about the way they look? What does Helen Thomas' hair color have to do with the fact that she's a ballsy woman? If you were reading what was supposed to be a serious article about a male reporter, you wouldn't find a paragraph descibing his haircut or his suit or his personal life unless it somehow contributed to the value of the story.

C'mon, Alternet, you know better than this!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Check on the audience... Posted by: 4sense
» hair color Posted by: LDavistrueblue
Helen Thomas...
Posted by: Germanicus on Oct 11, 2006 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Moyers,
Walter Cronkite,
Edward R. Murrow... oops. I guess we cannot call him out of retirement. Thank God for Olbermann.

Friends, we are skating on very thin ice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Oct 11, 2006 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Helen Thomas had no need to apologize. Bush IS the worst president in the history of the republic. The Republican party has descended from glorious Lincoln to a babbling idiot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George W for Wrong BU__! SH__!
Posted by: williameon on Oct 15, 2006 2:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A turkey was chatting with a bull.

"I would love to be able to get to the top of that tree," sighed the turkey, but I haven't got the energy."

"Well, why don't you nibble on my droppings?" replied the bull.

"They're packed with nutrients."

The turkey pecked at a lump of dung and found that it gave him enough strength to reach the lowest branch of the tree.

The next day, after eating some more dung, he reached the second branch.

Finally after a fourth night, there he was proudly perched at the top of the tree.

Soon he was spotted by a farmer, who shot the turkey out of the tree.

Moral of the story: Bullsh?t might get you to the top, but it won't keep you there

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right on Helen!
Posted by: calibandita on Oct 15, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thnk you for still investing your energies in our countries' happenings, people of all ages & walks of life should take a lesson from you----its never too late or inappropriate to ativly question & dialog our leaders motives..because hat is the real core issue. It's like choosing a team captain when you're young, based on his way of handling things that makes the group overall comfortable, only to find out he's a phoney and he won't even acknowledge that there is a possibility he's not the "perfect captain"
Constructive criticsm is necessary for all human beings, & when a person takes any form of it so personally as to not even acknowledge it, they are only selling themselves short in the long run.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement