Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Truth Behind Tainted Spinach

By Michael Ableman, Prairie Writers Circle. Posted October 5, 2006.


The e. coli spinach scare prompted cries for better regulation and inspection, but the drama distracts us from something much bigger: a vast industrial food system built on cheap, empty calories.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michael Ableman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Not long ago lettuce came only in heads and spinach in bunches. For a salad, someone else might do the growing, but you still did the trimming and washing. You had some control -- and responsibility -- over the process. Now salad comes prewashed and bagged. You just pour it on a plate, dress it, put it in your mouth and chew.

This convenience adds risk. You give one more job over to someone somewhere else, trusting that they are concerned as much about product quality and your health as about the bottom line on the quarterly report.

But the business of food is now big business, and it might be making us sick. Witness the spinach tainted with E. coli bacteria that is blamed for more than 180 people infected in 26 states and Ontario, Canada, including one death.

The first mixed salad greens and loose spinach were from small, local growers who hand-cut the young greens and rushed them to market, organ-transplant style. Now we have a multimillion-dollar salad industry that consolidates raw ingredients from many big producers and has little control over growing methods. Washing salad ingredients on this scale requires facilities more like municipal swimming pools or public bathhouses than where our food should come from. And if you remember sixth-grade biology, you know that stuffing fresh, green leaves into sealed plastic bags is a great way to breed bacteria.

The spinach scare has prompted cries for better regulation and inspection. But the drama over one microorganism distracts us from something much bigger: a vast industrial food system built on cheap, empty calories -- from government-subsidized corn, for example -- that feed epidemic levels of obesity and diabetes. Sometimes it seems a system more interested in finding ways to pump more high-fructose corn syrup into kids' breakfast cereals than in providing fresh, whole foods to nourish their growing bodies.

The day after the spinach story broke, I was selling at the local farm market. My tables were loaded with the abundance of fall: strawberries and melons, French beans, squashes, onions, heirloom tomatoes, sweet peppers, lettuce, chard and spinach. The spinach drew the most attention. Deep green leaves, each the size of small dinner platters, filled five bins. By midmorning they were empty. All buyers had heard about the tainted spinach, but none hesitated to fill their bags.

I didn't have to explain why my spinach was different from that recalled from supermarkets. Neither did other market gardeners across the continent. We are part of a broad movement reclaiming food from faceless, long-distance industrial providers. We're demanding not only that it be safe, but that it taste good -- and that it be grown in a way that honors the land and those doing the work. And while it's true that we could slip up and make someone sick, the results of any carelessness would be smaller, more local.

Food safety doesn't hinge on monitoring tiny bacteria. It depends on the most fundamental aspect of a healthy food system: relationships -- biological, personal, ecological and local. Those relationships are on a scale small and, so, familiar. My local customers don't need federal inspections, more regulations, sophisticated sampling and analysis, or even an organic label. They know me, they know my farm, they know the care and attention I place in every step.

If we are truly concerned about food safety, we need to know the folks who grow our food, know that they are paid a decent wage, know that the land they farm is well cared for and protected, and know that the food they grow has not been irradiated or genetically engineered or exposed to pesticides. It is this knowing that will truly nourish us and keep us well.

Digg!

Michael Ableman farms with his wife and two sons on an island in British Columbia. His latest book is "Fields of Plenty." This comment was written for the Prairie Writers Circle, a project of the Land Institute, Salina, Kan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Junk
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 5, 2006 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The industrial food system is mostly responsible for the epidemic of fat-caused diabetes and other disease in America. Junk, polluted, poison-sprayed, unhealthy food is the prime cause of disease and death in America along with the poverty and lack of good health care made worse by the Bushies. We need a peace and health revolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Junk Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Junk Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Junk, Bush IS partly responsible Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: Junk Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Junk Posted by: slydad
Eating local is the first step
Posted by: Lizmv on Oct 5, 2006 2:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Toward building strong LOCAL economies. Shop at farmer's markets, join a CSA, join a food co-op, find a community garden and grow your own. An added benefit to shopping local I have discovered is that I have less than one half a bag of trash every 2 weeks, no packaging to throw away!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ating local is the first step Posted by: grammasanity
Hey Mr. Farmer,
Posted by: cold2touch on Oct 5, 2006 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
keep on growing 'em.
When my wife and I visited Vancouver Island 2 years ago, we were struck how every grocery even in back country has ample supply of locally grown organic produce, how the organic farms were always frequented by shoppers looking to fill their trunks directly from growers fields.
Although we slept in hotels, we hardly ever ate in restaurants, preferring to drag our loot to the room or eat by the roadside.

And the people looked damn healthy, hardly an obese person during the entire trip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey Mr. Farmer, Posted by: ezilla
» Me too! Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Me too! Posted by: ezilla
It's not lazy, being green.
Posted by: WIenvi on Oct 5, 2006 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a friend make a comment yesterday about the increase in obesity among the poor due to the exact issues raised in this article, and I thought to myself, she's just NOW thinking that? I remember reading articles in the mid-80s that discussed how the poor at cheaper foods, mostly starches like pasta, potatoes and such. The articles indicated that these high-carbohydrate foods lead to higher instances of obesity. And this was PRE-Atkins era. I am always in wonder at the timing of these "epidemics" and "issues" that our society latches on to. Not that it's not an issue. It's just not NEWs.

However, the new infatuation with organic and locally-grown produce is becoming more and more chic, not only on the cash-rich coasts, but also in the Heartland (and it's damned about time). As much as I would love to say this is due to a new appreciation for local economy and the environment, more and more, I'm afraid, this is more of a class issue. Farmers markets, as wonderful as they are, are not cheap. And they require a considerable amount of time and planning to take advantage of them. If you are working full-time, have a family, a house to take care of, etc, etc, it becomes more difficult to plan around that weekly, 3-4 hour window that the market is open. It is a LUXURY to shop at these markets. It takes effort to eat the vegetables before they go bad (which is usually 3-4 days). Unless it is your food intake is your priority, the larger food market is just not going to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Farmers' mkts in poor neighborhoods do adapt Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Food shouldn't be cheap Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Food shouldn't be cheap Posted by: sunnyday
» RE: Food shouldn't be cheap Posted by: ezilla
» RE: Food shouldn't be cheap Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Food shouldn't be cheap Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Fatties at the Farmer's Market
Posted by: magmaybe on Oct 5, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm in agreement with nearly everything said here in these comments - I am an absolute 100% supporter of organic, local agriculture. The spinach scare didn't worry me for one minute because I *know* where my spinach comes from - I know the man who grows it, I've helped him on his farm, and much of it I grew myself. We eat a whole foods, vegetarian, primarily organic diet. My favorite? Summer organic peaches right off the tree. There's very little as wonderful as that. Agribusiness is an enormous problem.

But it *would* be nice if folks would stop equating health with thinness. What do you people think when you see fat me at the co-op or the farmer's market? That I just started eating this way? That I'm some kind of freakish anomaly? I've eaten a whole foods, high fiber diet for years. Yes, I've lost weight and will probably lose more, but I will always be above what the diet dictocrats say I should be. And it may surprise you to find out how many unhealthy thin people there are in the world. My thin friends eat more shit than I do by the truckload - they're not fat, but they're massively unhealthy. So while I understand that being fat is not necessarily healthy, FAT is not the only indicator of poor health in the world, and I get tired of it being the first adjective to imply an unhealthy state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fatties at the Farmer's Market Posted by: grammasanity
Quarterly report or hard day's dollar?
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Oct 5, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Handing off the resposibility for the shredding, etc., doesn't much reflect the growing process itself. The way that spinach is sold doesn't vary as much lettuce anyway. The people who actually touch the stuff have less concern for the quarterly report than any of us.

By all well informed accounts, the e-coli was introduced through agricultural conditions - perhaps organic fertilizers. Better investigations than this have already shown us, for example, that manure from feedlot livestock presents more of that particular risk than that from pasture fed animals.

I am more intersted in this comparison: in the early 1970s there were some 50,000 food processing facilities and the FDA managed 35,000 on-site inspections annually. In any given year 70% percent of them stood to be inspected, none could expect to operate long without being expected.

Now there are over 100,000 such facilities and the FDA musters about 5,000 inspections annually. You stand a 5% chance of on-site inspection in any given year, and may well operate for twenty years without inspection. If there should be any cronyism or handshake assurances, some of these facilities can look forward to NO inspections under current ownership.

Now we are the canaries. We discover problems when someone gets sick, and then rush to find the cause. A more efficient process, no doubt. Why repeatedly inspect where no problems exist? Why not inspect only when we suspect an actual problem? Those pesky inspectors often required costly remedies for practices that didn't actually sicken the public. No one has yet died from a booger in their bratwurst.

The inspections themselves are a good deal more cumbersome, too. We no longer leave it up to a varied assortment including the likes of an occasional Columbo or Quincy amongst a gaggle of cousin Vinnies. Our efforts to make them more foolproof and to save money (fewer persons to do it) represent just one more incident where we have been so clever as to perhaps outsmart even ourselves.

How many remember the case near Milwaukee (93 or 94) where the illnesses were eventually tracked to one person selling carnival food who had not yet mastered the proper use of toilet paper and soap? I mention that in contrast, of course. No county health department can possibly check under the fingernails of every one that handles food eaten by others. So, drink up, and have another booger on me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only way, do our own.
Posted by: symcokid on Oct 5, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We raise our own vegetables and maintaining a garden is a lot of work, but rewarding. We consume fresh vegetables right to the end and can much of our produce like our grandparents used to do. Certain veggies like sweet corn, potatoes, cabbage and a few others we buy from local farmers markets and directly from the farm. We aren't too concerned about e-coli and such as we know what we have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An interesting situation...
Posted by: BeeGee on Oct 5, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The e. coli spinach incident interested me for a variety of reasons: (1) I used to live in tiny mission town in California where the Naturally Preferred spinach was packed, (2) this produce was organic, (3) to the best of my knowledge, all the evidence was circumstantial (the ill people had all eaten the spinach but to the best of my knowledge, e. coli was not found at either the processing site or on any of the actual produce). All the above information about huge processing operations versus small farms is correct, but probably didn't apply to this situation as much as to others. Certainly it wasn't a kitchen-sink operation but to the extent that it was labeled organic, more care than usual must take place there. Don't know what conclusions can be drawn from any of that, but as I said, it's interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Poop on Spinach
Posted by: AdamG on Oct 5, 2006 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's really surprising to me that more food scares likes this don't happen more often. When you have a food "system", where you pay the people who are handling your food as little as possible, is it any surprise they might not be the most sanitary? I'm surprised someone doesn't just take a big crap in a sald bag. No offense to the families who were affected by e.coli, but we deserve this for handing off all our responsibilites in providing for ourselves and our families. All those people, all they really had to do is WASH IT THEMSELVES and they probably wouldn't have gotten e.coli.

Another note on the e.coli thing. My theory is this: E.coli can only live in highly acidic conditions (the stomach and intestines) and it can only live off simple sugars. So, go to a fast food restaraunt, chuck down a burger, fries, maybe a salad and wash it down with a SODA! I think people are basically setting up the perfect conditions to culture e.coli when the go to eat fast food. I imagine if it were studied it would prove true but, I'm not holding my breathe for it to really get studied. If the reaction by the soda industry when soda was linked to obesity is any indicator, they definitely would let any studies like this happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Washing may not be the answer Posted by: Bic Pentameter
The Real Poop on Spinach
Posted by: AdamG on Oct 5, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's really surprising to me that more food scares likes this don't happen more often. When you have a food "system", where you pay the people who are handling your food as little as possible, is it any surprise they might not be the most sanitary? I'm surprised someone doesn't just take a big crap in a sald bag. No offense to the families who were affected by e.coli, but we deserve this for handing off all our responsibilites in providing for ourselves and our families. All those people, all they really had to do is WASH IT THEMSELVES and they probably wouldn't have gotten e.coli.

Another note on the e.coli thing. My theory is this: E.coli can only live in highly acidic conditions (the stomach and intestines) and it can only live off simple sugars. So, go to a fast food restaraunt, chuck down a burger, fries, maybe a salad and wash it down with a SODA! I think people are basically setting up the perfect conditions to culture e.coli when the go to eat fast food. I imagine if it were studied it would prove true but, I'm not holding my breathe for it to really get studied. If the reaction by the soda industry when soda was linked to obesity is any indicator, they definitely wouldn't let any studies like this happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

la la la
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 5, 2006 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smalltime markets are nice but you have to consider the massive... truly utterly massive scale of consumption in a country with 300 million people. Everything is massive. We simply cannot produce enough food using anything except the most modern mass production methods. From flour to sugar to chickens to oranges, the enormity of each production system is monstrous. You're literally living in a dream world if you think we can get away from all that without losing... 99% of the population. Maybe in 100 years with advanced technologies and "free" energy sources, we can bring back local farming and local sustenance... but by then who knows what "blessings" the neocons will have brought humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nonsense. Posted by: Michael in CA
» that's horseshit Posted by: AdamG
Meanwhile, in Brazil
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Oct 5, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We bring the benefits of free trade to a beleagered population. Some Brazilian states were resolved not to introduce genetically modified crops. Through creative lobbying multinational firms such as Monsanto have persuaded local legislatures to allow them a foothold.

The real goal, of course, is to separate the local population from their traditional lifestyles and means of sustenance. Convert them into consumers and excess labor, migrating in large numbers to slums surounding large cities where desperation leads to every manner of survival.

So pernicious are these attempts that, after the fact, Monsanto has claimed proprietary rights to the organisms and farmers are not free to replant parts of their own crops as seed without paying a royalty. Young men are seen at night driving in trucks and throwing handfuls of grain into the fields of farmers who refuse to make the change.

If testing shows that any part of a crop is genetically modified, all of it must be taken to different silos. Modified or not, crops leave in trucks headed for ports to be taken abroad, processed, packaged and returned to supermarkets.

The communal lifestyle which was largely based on market-farming and and the farmers market in every village square is being systematically dismantled. The process may be impossible to stop.

Funny that we don't warn other countries that globalism is headed their way in the form of organized carpetbagging on a scale that consumes entire cultures, rather than trumpet its benefits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gentlewoman
Posted by: lokicat on Oct 5, 2006 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one has mentioned that the usual source of the e-coli bacteria is usually found to be the human gut. Growers often fail to provide sanitary facilities in the fields for their workers. When you gotta go you gotta go...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eating Simple and Healthy COSTS!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Oct 5, 2006 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider this:

My wife and I are both disabled, she on oxyen 24-7 and other COPD meds, me on lots of meds for nerve damage ignored for over 10 years, then 5 messed up operations. I just spent over $300 - almost $400 out of my $824 a month Social Security Disablilty check - in pills the VA does not carry and Medicare does not pay for. Without them I can't move much, my wife gets no care at all (we "make too much" for any healthcare or home help), and I also can't rest. Soon her insurance from work runs out (she pays almost $400 a month for it) and MUST have oxygen, but the insurance co won't buy her an oxygen concentrator - another $400 or so - and prefers to rent it for almost that much a month; now they just can't be reached. She has to wait two years (a regulation) for Medicare.

We get $10 - right: ten dollars a month - in food stamps (we "make too much" for more). We live in the middle of farm country, but the big supermarkets drop their prices during and just after harvest. Doesn't matter much though: lately I live on frozen pizza and such - when it's on sale. I hurt too much to stand long enough to wash the dishes and things I need to cook with and eat from except JUST what we need then. I eat once a day usually (I also have type II diabetes); she lives mostly on generic supplements and sometimes one small meal a day and is about 45 pounds underweight. I try to feed her other stuff, but she can't eat a lot at once, and we end up tossing a lot even using the freezer.

Meat of any kind is usually too expensive, especially the seafood she loves most. One salmon fillet runs $10 - $14 (and I worry about mercury and dioxin), frozen shrimp $20, hamburger $5 (less than a pound) - $26 for family size. Heating gas prices are up and it's already freezing at night. Electricity is also up. Anyway, all the meat grown here is shipped out. A package of mushrooms is $4.49 at Safeway.

We eat the cheapest, easiest to fix, least nourishing shit we can buy because it's all we can buy. I can hunt - poach if necessary - I know wild mushrooms and other forest things, like Indian celery, berries, and so on, but I don't dare leave her for more than a couple of hours, which is still too much really, and we have no on to help. That much effort would incapacitate me for I don't know how long , too. The house is not clean - it's 60 years old and falling apart faster than we are.

And I understand we're in better shape than most people who are disabled. Oh, and NOTHING pays for dentistry, so my 4 broken fillings will just have to stay that way.

It's my darling's 60th birthday in a few days.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ating Simple and Healthy COSTS! Posted by: montana freeman
E. Coli scare
Posted by: vangogh69 on Oct 5, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People might be more horrified if they knew the extent of food recalls each month because this or that corporation has overlooked steps1,2, or 3. The E. Coli thing is to be expected when something needed for survival (food) is taken to the "free market" (same with healthcare). Quite frankly, the American environment (physically and mentally) is so thoroughly poisoned, it's little wonder we have so many sick people out there.

As much as I like eating organicallhy like the next guy, I gotta say, it's a bit expensive to eat well. Now, I don't live on a farm, which may be part of the problem, but the organic stuff, while availible costs a hell of a lot more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: . Coli scare Posted by: AdamG
Its the illegals fault
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 5, 2006 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
EColi comes from feces, this case feces from humans. Most likely it was a result of the illegal immigrants used to work almost slave-like conditions without any sanitary facilities to defecate. This likely spread to the spinach. I surprised this doesn't happen more often. I know that home builders put up Port-o-let chemical toliets at their facilities for the illegals to use. HOWEVER, anyone whose been to a jobsite knows that they most likely go to the bathroom in the nearby woods. You'll find the unfortunate evidence of toliet paper and feces nearby any job site. At first I was disgusted. Then my builder mentioned to me "have you ever been inside a Port-o-John in 105 degree temperature that has been there a week." So its not their FAULT in terms of they have no choice, but it is their FAULT in that it led to the EColi outbreak. Just another reason to stop the slave labour camps and the illegals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its our fault Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Its our fault Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Its our fault Posted by: maryqc
Better off on the farm
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Oct 6, 2006 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You most surely are! You might, however, look into ways of acquiring and storing water (morning temp differential [dew] collection), a per-plant drip instead of losing so much into the air, and gather seeds for your own personal use and maybe a bit more, depending where you are and if you could sell/trade or gift it. Expect droughts, possibly some or a lot of societal breakdown, and see about being as self-sufficient as you can be.

Things are going to get worse, maybe much worse, before they get better.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Better off on the farm Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Better off on the farm Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Better off on the farm Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Better off on the farm Posted by: albrechtkrausse