Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Dismantles Child Care

By Ruth Rosen, TomPaine.com. Posted October 5, 2006.


America's child care crunch is more dire than ever, thanks to Bush's gutting of government programs that assist working families.
100506story
100506story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Ruth Rosen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

What kind of society have we become? Before members of Congress departed for recess, they gave President George W. Bush -- hardly known for his wisdom or compassion -- the right to define what constitutes torture and to suspend the constitutional right of habeas corpus. But our elected representatives couldn't find time to pass the Labor, Health and Human Service appropriations bill which, among things, funds child care.

The "Child Care Crisis" -- the absence of anyone to care for America's children, elderly and disabled -- has turned into the new millennium's version of the "Problem That Has No Name," It is the 800-pound elephant that sits in Congress, our homes and offices -- gigantic, but ignored.

And, it keeps getting worse. According to a new 50-state report on child care policies just released by the National Women's Law Center, the Bush administration has successfully dismantled government services for children. State funds for child care assistance have fallen for the fifth year in a row. The problem will soon become catastrophic when large numbers of single mothers bump up against their five-year life limit on welfare.

The report portrays a bleak picture of our national child care deficit. Nancy Duff Campbell, co-president of NWLC, says that: "The new federal welfare work requirement [passed this year] creates more demand for child care assistance without providing enough funding to meet that demand." No big surprise here. Many of us always knew that the elimination of guaranteed welfare -- replaced by Temporary Assistance to Need Families -- was designed to reduce the number of women on the welfare rolls, not to reduce poverty.

The report also finds that states are failing to adequately compensate providers. Helen Blank, NWLC director of leadership and public policy, describes the consequences of paying child care workers such poor wages:

Low-income children are denied critical early learning experiences. Parents find it difficult to access the child care they need to work. And providers, who are often low-income women themselves, face earning less or going out of business.

Poor working mothers face other barriers as well. Two-thirds of the states have raised the income eligibility and copayments for child care and 18 states have long waiting lists. All of these barriers to adequate childcare make it extremely difficult for women to work, feel confident that their children are safe and to get off welfare.

But do either Democrats or Republicans think this constitutes a threat to the national security of our society? No. In fact, more than three decades after Congress passed -- and President Richard Nixon vetoed -- the 1971 comprehensive child care legislation, child care has all but dropped off the national political agenda. And, with each passing year, the child care crisis only grows larger, burdening the lives of working mothers. But it never reaches our nation's political agenda.

Anti-feminists naturally blame the women's movement for abandoning their children for the impossible ideal of "having it all." But it was journalists and popular writers, not women's rights activists, who created the myth of the "superwoman." Feminists of the 1960s and 1970s always knew that women couldn't do it alone. In fact, they insisted that men share the housework and child rearing and that government and business should provide and subsidize child care.

Single mothers naturally suffer the most from the child care crisis, but even with two parents, there is not much time for family life. Parents become overwhelmed, children feel cranky, workers quietly seethe and gulp antacids and sleeping pills, and volunteering in community life gradually vanishes.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: child, care, social, programs

Ruth Rosen is a historian and journalist who teaches public policy at UC Berkeley. She is a senior fellow at the Longview Institute. A new edition of her most recent book, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America (Penguin, 2001), will be published with an updated epilogue in 2007.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
every way
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 5, 2006 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every day in every way America is moving toward self destruction and ghastly corruption courtesy of the bushies and the corrupt members of Congress who vote for their degraded and goofy laws. The earth is really becoming flat, flat out wrong and flatulently stinky. Instead of subsidizing health and decency the bushies are subsidizing death, destruction, corruption and decay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: every way Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: every way Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: every way Posted by: cinattra
» tea-partying Posted by: sheena2u
why should the feds be in day care business at all?
Posted by: edith on Oct 5, 2006 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
article misses two big points: most of these kids should not be. Period. If you can't afford to have kids, don't. The government role should be in promotion of family planning, not raising kids. I'm for federal abortion funding too, but politically that's poison.

Second, in the US day care is not primarily a federal responsibility. States have done quite nicely thank you in the past several years of increased revenues. Primary responsibility should be at the state and local level, where providers are licensed.

I keep hearing here how Bush is a Nazi etc. Why would you want a Nazi govt to raise your kids?

The best way to assure our kids get the care their parents want them to have(which is part of "freedom") is to keep the govt out of day care as much as possible. The feds don't tax the incomes of the thousands of nonprofit day care providers; that itself is a massive subsidy the article fails to mention.

Also I would like to know how much even after the so called cuts are made to federal day care is spent by the Feds on day care aid compared with assistance ten years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» or your mouth Posted by: edith
» RE: And now I need to wash my hands... Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» Down the Street Posted by: edith
» RE: Down the Street Posted by: cinattra
» RE: Down the Street Posted by: sheena2u
» Thank You for Thinking Posted by: edith
» RE: Hey, name caller Posted by: sheena2u
» This is about our country! Posted by: sheena2u
» No kids are abandoned Posted by: edith
» This is not about YOU EDITH! Posted by: sheena2u
» You are in la la land Edith Posted by: sheena2u
» Eat the Rich Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: at the Rich Posted by: slydad
» It isn't there Posted by: edith
» Edith you are sad Posted by: sheena2u
» You miss the points edith Posted by: sheena2u
This may seem off topic
Posted by: Lizmv on Oct 5, 2006 2:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I do recommend reading David Korten's "The Great Turning". His short but brilliant bare boned history of American Empire connects all the dots and explains WHY so much of our wealth is directed toward building empire rather than supporting the population.

Childcare, education, healthcare, affordable housing, high quality food, renewable energy, all the things we humans need for a better quality of life do not enrich the elite or contribute to the building of Empire. We need to accept the facts, we are not going to get them from the ruling class. We are going to have to take them for ourselves on a very local level.

Just my personal opinion, the more people who choose to step out of the system, quit working jobs they stay in just for health insurance, quit buying things they don't need, quit paying taxes and quit buying into the myth of the American Dream, the sooner Empire will fall. Terrifying, I know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, maybe not that near Posted by: mrcentrist
» I think I see the boats Posted by: AdamG
» RE: I think I see the boats Posted by: sheena2u
» definitely a market distortion Posted by: cinattra
Vote 'em out! LOL
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 5, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the question that all Americans should ask themselves before they cast their votes in November

The corporate establishment is firmly in control of our government. Its goals are not the same as working class goals. Or even human goals. Both parties are financed by the same corporatocracy. We can't vote the establishment out of power.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vote 'em out! LOL Posted by: marxalot
» RE: Vote 'em out! LOL Posted by: cold2touch
» RE: Vote 'em out! LOL Posted by: Shehova
» RE: Vote 'em out! LOL Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Vote 'em out! LOL Posted by: slydad
The greatest liar in history of universe
Posted by: cold2touch on Oct 5, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was there ever ANY time that Bush has told the truth?
I do believe that it is part of his pact with the devil, never, ever to tell the truth (I think that promise was the last truth ever).

Clean Air Act, No Child Left Behind, WMDs in Iraq, War On Terror, Sadam=Osama, Mission Accomplished, Rebuild NO/LA, Patriot Act, Support The Troops ...

And not one god damn time did MSM ever say the word LIE. I guess they couldn't get it past the mouth full of shit, courtesy of WH press secretaries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The greatest fool is you Posted by: sheena2u
Maintaining high poverty levels is a deliberate Republican policy.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 5, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney dismantled the Office of Economic Opportunity (War on Poverty) for Nixon in 1970. They did not want poor people to learn how to change the system. Nor did they want middle-class people finding out that poor people are just like themselves. Such a development was a nightmare to the rich.

So Lewis Powell wrote his infamous memo to the rich (in this case the head of the national Chamber of Commerce) warning that the counter-culture and Students for a Democratic Society were threatening to overthrow America. That earned Powell a seat on the Supreme Court.

So we missed the chance in the 1970s to change the system. The elephant in the room, the name that no one dares to speak even in this marvelous article is "socialism." All the programs cited as needed here exist in democratic socialist countries. Great Britain has reduced the number of children living in poverty.

How come GB can do it and we cannot? We don't have a Labor Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Isn't What You Think
Posted by: glorybe on Oct 5, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't like Bush one little bit and I am usually thrilled to blame him for as much as I can. However we are not dealing with the real issues at all.
At first a man's work could easily support an entire family even when the husband was unskilled. Then it took two jobs to pay for the family and then the wives took jobs and sometimes the wives even took two jobs and the family income still will not provide a nice lifestyle.
And here is the truth of it: America used to loot and exploit foreign nations as well as minorities at home. When we got rid of slavery and policies of stealing the wealth of foreign nations we were left without any real economy at all. That is why we are seeing the great downward spiral. Until we are able to sell the rest of the world a product that they need and can not produce on their own we will continue to circle the drain.
Until such a glorious day the one thing we have a chance of controling is reproduction. Frankly having a child is no longer something that either the poor or the middle classes should attempt. Having a baby is now for rich people only. It's time to face that fact and with all the problems and needs of the public the last thing we need is the expense of government funded child care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Isn't What You Think Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: It Isn't What You Think Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: It Isn't What You Think Posted by: darkgrrrl
» RE: It Isn't What You Think Posted by: sheena2u
4 Years And Counting
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 5, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In less than 4 years the leading edge of the baby boom will hit the traditional retirement age of 65. Each succeeding year, for about 2 decades, we will see the ranks of people drawing social security and medicare benefits selling at a phenomenal pace. This alone will drive the cost of such programs from about 7% up to 13% of our economy's total output.

What does this have to do with child care? Plenty, and I'm glad you asked.

Set aside your right/left rugged individualism/social welfare world-view and just look at it from a statistical or self-interest viewpoint. The better we raise/educate and care for the next generation of kids, the better able they are going to be to help pay the tremendous tax burden that such costs will necessitate. The more they can earn, the better off we will all be. Otherwise the better off they are, the better off you are in your retirement/old age.

NeoCons are the most ignorant people in the world when it comes to things like this. They always wish to put off until tomorrow that which can more easily be addressed today. In the pay me now or pay me later realities of US demographics relative to the cost of entitlement programs, pay me now is much better for all concerned.

Aside from the basic moral argument about the rightness of investing in the care, welfare and education of ALL our nation's children, we simply cannot afford to cripple the next generation with poor healthcare, housing, education, childcare, etc. It's not money wasted- it's money invested in the future of our nation

In an earlier response it was argued that most of these kids shouldn't have been born. That's about as germane as arguing that the sun should rise in the west every morning. NeoCons and social conservatives need to stop playing god and get their head out of the sand (or whatever dark place they have it).

Meeting the needs of our children, all of our children is he wise, moral and ethical thing to do. It's a real family value and the right thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4 Years And Counting Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: 4 Years And Counting Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: 4 Years And Counting Posted by: Lincoln fan
Who cares?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 5, 2006 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You really want Bush to take care of your children? Or any of those corrupt, and often perverted, people in government to be responisble for bringing up your child? Are you crazy? Here's an idea. Take care of your own children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who cares? Posted by: loril
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: loril
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: TooDamnCool
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: loril
Are you middle class?
Posted by: loril on Oct 5, 2006 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do any of these scenarios hit home?

Do you need to work 2 jobs to stay in your home/neighborhood? Do you and your spouse both need to work to maintain any personal savings at all -- or just to pay bills? Are you responsible with money (no spree shopping you cannot afford) but still unable to put aside any real savings?

If your car died tomorrow, would you have any downpayment at your disposal to reasonably finance a new or new-to-you vehicle? When you are ill, can you simply go to a doctor, or do you need to worry about the fees? Do you even have a doctor/insurance? When is the last time you had a physical or a dental appointment?

Does the one-bedroom "condo" you live in with the view of the highway (so convenient to 1 or 2 of your jobs!) count as a middle class home? Are you still living in one of these in your 40s or 50s? Will you ever stop renting?

Do you feel tempted to go get a "cash advance" for the first time in your life because you had a bad month and some unforeseen expenses? Will you have tuition for your kids when they are ready for college? Do you lease your car? How about major appliances or furniture? How much credit card debt do you have? Do you juggle these cards to pay bills?

What if you lost your job tomorrow? Do you have enough in savings to cover your basic expenses for few months?

Are you really middle class?

See, most of us were not for the history of recorded time. And then, for a brief time, a lot of us were. And now we are slipping back. Our "betters" want it this way. They had to concede too much to us a few generations ago and now they want to pull the plug on this party so that they can go back to Gilded Age profits.

Yes, we still have a more comfortable underclass existance then our forebears. At least we have to wear clip on ties to some of our jobs and we toil with head sets rather than shovels. But how long is your work week?

And the enablers to the ruling class will tell the rest of us to "quitcherbitchin". If you are not wealthy you don't deserve child care, you don't deserve kids, you don't deserve medicine, you don't deserve to live beyond your expiration date (once you grow too tired to perform all these service functions.)

Once upon a time we had the brains and the attitude to fight this mentality and stand up for ourselves. But that era is beginning to sound like a long time ago. Computer aided voting fraud, propaganda masked as 'news', the dismantling of the labor movement and the erosion of social services all have played a premeditated role in bringing the middle and working classes back down to our knees where our overlords want us to remain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New export market opportunity
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 5, 2006 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't we just start shipping all this surplus population to China? They're good at handling excess numbers of people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny...
Posted by: TooDamnCool on Oct 5, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny, I always thought it was my responsibility to care for my children, not the governments. How silly of me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If you want to breed them Posted by: TooDamnCool
EVERYTHING FOR WAR - NOTHING FOR THE PEOPLE!
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 5, 2006 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again the National Security State has spoken. They say, why have kids unless you are rich??? Well, here is what I say, "Why have wars, unless you are attacked? And we all know about that with Iraq.

First of all, every major developed country subsidizes day-care. In France and Germany, up to 100% is paid for and do you know why? Because these are to be the future wage earning and tax paying citizens of the country. Get it Repubotards?

Next, where should the money go. To Iraq, to the tune of $1 trillion plus and counting very soon? To Halliburton and Bechtel execs, I guarantee they can afford day care.

Next, the USA minimum wage is the lowest of any developed country. It's slave labor for millions. But billions being made for execs and corporate honchos.

The excesses of "free enterprise" need to be moderated by realistic social programs. Day care is a prime example and an investment in the future of our country. And a much better investment then what we are investing in now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Apples and Oranges Posted by: edith
» and Squid Ink - check the Forbes 400... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Unbridled Consumption Posted by: edith
» RE: Unbridled Consumption Posted by: sheena2u
EVERYTHING FOR WAR - NOTHING FOR THE PEOPLE!
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 5, 2006 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again the National Security State has spoken. They say, why have kids unless you are rich??? Well, here is what I say, "Why have wars, unless you are attacked? And we all know about that with Iraq.

First of all, every major developed country subsidizes day-care. In France and Germany, up to 100% is paid for and do you know why? Because these are to be the future wage earning and tax paying citizens of the country. Get it Repubotards?

Next, where should the money go. To Iraq, to the tune of $1 trillion plus and counting very soon? To Halliburton and Bechtel execs, I guarantee they can afford day care.

Next, the USA minimum wage is the lowest of any developed country. It's slave labor for millions. But billions being made for execs and corporate honchos.

The excesses of "free enterprise" need to be moderated by realistic social programs. Day care is a prime example and an investment in the future of our country. And a much better investment then what we are investing in now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EVERYTHING FOR WAR - NOTHING FOR THE PEOPLE!
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 5, 2006 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again the National Security State has spoken. They say, why have kids unless you are rich??? Well, here is what I say, "Why have wars, unless you are attacked? And we all know about that with Iraq.

First of all, every major developed country subsidizes day-care. In France and Germany, up to 100% is paid for and do you know why? Because these are to be the future wage earning and tax paying citizens of the country. Get it Repubotards?

Next, where should the money go. To Iraq, to the tune of $1 trillion plus and counting very soon? To Halliburton and Bechtel execs, I guarantee they can afford day care.

Next, the USA minimum wage is the lowest of any developed country. It's slave labor for millions. But billions being made for execs and corporate honchos.

The excesses of "free enterprise" need to be moderated by realistic social programs. Day care is a prime example and an investment in the future of our country. And a much better investment then what we are investing in now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End proletariat suffrage
Posted by: LtL on Oct 5, 2006 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
End proletariat suffrage

To the dredge of society that:

Had kids and can’t afford day care. NOT MY PROBLEM
Doesn’t make a living wage. NOT MY PROBLEM
Can’t afford health care. NOT MY PROBLEM

To hell with hilary and W.

Get off your poor uneducated lazy asses and do for yourselves. If you want to know why no one cares it is because every one of us are self concerned apes. We as a species only care about ourselves our family.

My father told me when I was young "No one is going to come along and give you anything because you are [my name]. You have to earn it."

1LT L Mosul, Iraq

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nd proletariat suffrage Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: nd proletariat suffrage Posted by: TooDamnCool
Only 800 pounds?
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 5, 2006 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a very SMALL elephant. Maybe you need bigger elephants. That way someone might discover the guts to tackle this problem properly. Or you could properly and permanently squash the idiots who ignore those who need care.

Funny you know - child care was abundant and FREE in the US during WWII. Obviously you need to send more men to Iraq or other war zones, so that women have to work in the factories and then the government will be forced to provide child care again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is really getting the free ride here? Hint: they pay more than the US military does.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 5, 2006 10:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a little explanatory note for all the US soldiers in Iraq who wonder why the 'US government contractors' in Iraq get paid $40,000 to their $20,000 - and those contractors can quit and go home any time they want.

It's because the contracts are paid on a 'cost-plus' structure - which means that the top contractor gets a fixed percentage of the total costs as profits. This means that the more Halliburton pays the truck driver for 'labor costs' the more profit Halliburton 'earns'.

That's not even the half of it - often the contractor hires a subcontractor, who has another subcontractor, who hires some starving Mideast laborer to do a little work with a shovel. Every subcontractor takes the 'cost-plus' deal or some variation - this is great. You sit in an office, get a call from the 'big contractor', call a 'subcontractor', and bang - thousands of dollars in your pocket... US taxpayer money, that is. At the end of the chain, there's not much left - it's called 'trickle-down' economics.

The peope of Iraq (who the US soldiers get to interact with daily)probably see all this as the US ripping them off, mainly for oil - they end up with no schools, no electricity, no water and no working sewage - and nothing to do but join up with the insurgency. Lovely - the civilian bosses at the CPA and the Pentagon did a bang-up job, didn't they? The media did an even better job of promoting the war for Bush et al - a kind of historical low for the US media.

End welfare? Let's start by ending corporate welfare. If US soldiers come back wounded and otherwise incapable of dealing with day-to-day basics, should they be 'thrown off welfare'? Take care of yourself? Is that why we have socialized fire, police and military services? What's wrong with socialized heath and educational services? We have socialized road construction, don't we? Ever hear of community values? Shared responsibility - there's a concept that could be more broadly applied.

What's the first thing the military teaches people? It's pretty simple: you are all in this together, so look out for each other! (unfortunately, the military also has a tendency to emphasize 'desensitization to killing')

I'd rather see tax dollars go towards taking care of some kids rather than towards the next generation of nuclear weapons, experimental biowarfare programs, or into the pockets of fat cat war profiteers. Why? It's simple: I have more faith in kids than I do in expensive techie war machinery. Machinery is replaceable, but human beings aren't - regardless of what the corporate clones believe.

We could do with far fewer corporate welfare programs and more community investment programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make up your damn mind!
Posted by: WyrdSister on Oct 6, 2006 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't have it all ya know.

You conservatives just crack my shit up. Your hypocracy is astounding!

Here you say:
"Sorry, but I would rather have the gov’t buy a bomb than subsidize the welfare mother of 10."

And over on the board regarding abortion, you say:
"If your ex convinced herself that her selfish decisions was “the right thing to do” then she needs counseling to come to grips with the fact that she killed he baby. "

So...lemme get this straight...

You think that women are murderers when they excersize their right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Women should not kill, that's bad.

But then, you think that when women choose not to abort, but find themselves in a stiuation where they cannot afford to raise those babies without help, you are against having programs that will help them. You would rather our government use that money to kill people. That's ok.

How do you reconsile these two opposing views? Are you crazy or just incredibley misogynistic?

Here's a thought...

If you are against abortion, get in line to adopt a special needs baby, or foster a child whose family was torn apart because mom is a meth-head and dad is cooking in the basement, or mom had to choose between putting food on the table and adequate supervision and had them taken away.

If you are against government programs that help mothers in need, then volunteer your time feeding homeless children, donate food, or blankets. Open up your home to a homeless mother so her children don't have to sleep on the street. Do something besides sit in here and bitch. If you are not apart of a solution, then you are perpetuating the problem.

My guess is that you do none of these things, in that case...just shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Make up your damn mind! Posted by: WitchyNy
» go fetch Posted by: edith
Conservative Nonsense on Daycare
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 6, 2006 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the conservatives again, that if the government funds daycare they will be "indoctrinating" the kids. Well, this does not have to be FOX news, you conservatives. There are thousands of STATE LICENSED (oh my God, government control again) day cares across America. I think they can all be subsidized instead of subsidizing Halliburton and Bechtel, don't you? Let us have real freedom, not just freedom for the rich only to have health care, shelter and food. And, oh by the way conservatives, the government also puts up traffic lights and stop signs also, talk about evil uhhh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mrs Bush travel the country praise "Education"
Posted by: raykaczmarek on Oct 9, 2006 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mrs Bush travel the country bragging "Education.
This polical spin---
She husband is Washingon D.C. cut program..
[A page from REPUBLIC manifest]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]