Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Putting Party Before Predators: Why Didn't GOP Leaders Stop Foley?

By Cenk Uygur, Huffington Post. Posted October 1, 2006.


In a scandal that will likely take down the entire House Republican leadership, everyone is wondering why Rep. Mark Foley, Chairman of the Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus was allowed to carry on his predatory behavior with a teenage boy a year after his relationship was revealed to party leaders.
100206story
Former Rep. Mark Foley. The Justice Department has been asked to conduct an investigation into electronic messages to teenage boys - a lurid scandal that has put House Republicans in political peril.
Advertisement

Watch a video of Rep. Foley giving an interview on child predators, in which he states "If I were one of these sickos, I’d be nervous with America’s Most Wanted on my trail."

Is there anything these Republicans won't cover up? Duke Cunningham took millions of dollars in bribes. The people who were buying him off bought him a yacht called the Duke-Stir. He had a bribe menu on Congressional letter head. How many ethics investigations? Zero. Zilch. Nada.

Bob Ney took gifts and favors from Jack Abramoff.

He has confessed and is about to go to prison. How many ethics investigations? Zero. None. Not one.

Then there is Hastert's shady land deal. Bill Frist's insider trading. Tom DeLay's money laundering. The list goes on and on. Every one of them had their ass covered by the rest of their Republican colleagues, crooks, whatever you want to call them.

When Joel Hefley, a conservative Republican from Colorado, had the temerity to actually do an ethics investigation of Tom DeLay -- he was removed. Can't have it. You can't have any ethics investigations in a place with no ethics. The house will fall in.

Well, now it has. Because they've gone too far. This time they covered for a sexual predator. Mark Foley, Republican of Florida, was caught sending very explicit sexual messages to 16 and 17 year old boys who worked as pages for Congress.

Actually, he was caught by a fellow Republican, Rodney Alexander, because one of the pages worked for Rep. Alexander and turned Foley in. So, what did the Republicans do about it? Absolutely nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

They covered it up. Because it's what they do.

The Republican Protection Racket stepped in and made the story go away. There was no public apology to the boys that were sexually harassed. No criminal investigation. No ethics investigation. Not a word.

The Republican leadership knew for most of the year. In all that time, while other kids could have been exposed, while they knew of several instances of sexual advances toward underage boys -- they did nothing!

Now, they feign outrage. Why weren't they outraged when they first found out about it? They're not outraged because young boys were jeopardized. They're outraged now because they're jeopardized.

But it gets worse. They left Foley in charge of the Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus. Come on!

If you put it in a movie about a corrupt Congress, I wouldn't believe it. It's too over the top. You'd walk out of the theater saying, "That's too much. No one would do that." Apparently they would and they did.

Remember this is the same Republicans who spent 140 hours investigating Bill Clinton's Christmas card list. I'm not kidding. They even started an investigation into his cat. If you put it in a movie, no one would believe it.


Digg!

Cenk Uygur is co-host of The Young Turks, the first liberal radio show to air nationwide.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Eyewitness Muse
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 1, 2006 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not so sure I buy that it'll take down the whole GOP leadership, though that would thrill me senseless. These guys have snaked their way out of so much already that I remain skeptical that they won't find a convenient diversion from this.

Anyway, the whole episode is sorry on so many levels, if the public doesn't toss them out at the polls they will have elected the congress they deserve.

New on EWM: Servants of the Seven Sins

...Dante sagely defined the deadly sin of envy as the “love of one’s own good perverted to a desire to deprive other men of theirs.” And brothers and sisters that fits the House GOP like a boy-sized Speedo...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Eyewitness Muse Posted by: jackyD
» RE: The Eyewitness Muse Posted by: Bozwell
...... Wow.
Posted by: acidrain69 on Oct 1, 2006 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just...... wow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ...... Wow. Posted by: Capybara
Hate to be pessimistic...
Posted by: AJN007 on Oct 1, 2006 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I wonder how the Dems are going to blow this opportunity. I'm not saying they should exploit the Foley scandal per se, but this article does a good job of showing a pattern. Can the Dems do an effective job of illustrating this same pattern to the larger public in a politically effective way? I'd love to see it. But somehow I doubt it will happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Forget elections..toss them out NOW! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» TOUCHE' absolutely right on! Posted by: Prophit
» RE: The main problem Posted by: astudent
» RE: The main problem Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Forget elections..toss them out NOW!..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» Maybe more than Anger management! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Any Adults in the house? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» 46 REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILES Posted by: soulfulnotes
» You forget something.... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Hate to be pessimistic... Posted by: Lynne14905
» RE: Hate to be pessimistic... Posted by: MasterAdrian
» RE: Hate to be pessimistic... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Hate to be pessimistic... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Dirty Politics Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: GK
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: GK
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: GK
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: GK
» RE: Dirty Politics Posted by: 1984NOW!!!
» RE: Dirty Politics..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
We keep seeing stuff like this.
Posted by: NeilDeal on Oct 1, 2006 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There seems to be a pattern.
Republican rails against something he/she says is immoral,
Republican gets busted practicing said immoral act, lifestyle, etc,
Republican has to resign.
And yes, this so seems to happen more with Republicans.

It's one of those self hating rampages that these folks do when they can't deal with who or what they are.

And the people that think what this guy is doing is the same as someone who is simply gay need to check in with reality.

This is child endangerment!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 1, 2006 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey they're republicans, they don't do that. I'm sure it's all a misunderstanding. Let's not jump to conclusions. Then again, why not. Some serious housecleaning is in order. The entire administration out to be put out at the curb with the rest of the garbage. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at bigger picture
Posted by: Moonray on Oct 1, 2006 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This latest Republican sleaze-fest is symptomatic of a problem that literally threatens the future of humankind: Our political system rewards and promotes the incompetent and corrupt while penalizing the principled public servants.

The war in Vietnam and the Iraq debacle are just two examples. Neither would have occurred if we had people in the White House who were reasonably knowledgeable about -- and respectful of -- other nations and cultures. But Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld think all Arabs are alike, which is why it seemed reasonable to them to attack Iraq even though the 9/11 plotters were based in Afghanistan.

Also watch the Republican congressmen who appear on the TV talk shows and you'll see what I mean. A lot of these people are just thugs dressed up in a suit. They don't have a clue about the principles our country was founded on, and they could not care less. And these people hold tremendous power.

We have to find a way to get these incompetent and unprincipled people out of our government, and keep them out. If we don't, the next unnecessary war they jump into might well end in a nuclear exchange.

A good first step would be to ban ALL private money from election campaigns. Modest public funds should be provided, with PBS providing debate time. Sound like pie-in-the-sky? Maybe, but we had better start making some serious changes soon, or these thugs will take us all down with them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Look at bigger picture...sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Standard behavior for Repugs
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Oct 1, 2006 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think this episode is exceptional, the following article contains a list of more than 30 other GOP sex predators :
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/node/1228/print

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ohb0b, Seattle
Posted by: ohb0b on Oct 1, 2006 7:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right... another scandal that is going to take down the entire Republican leadership. Just like Tom Delay, Valerie Plame, Trent Lott, who have I missed? There have been so many. Will someone please give Bush a BJ so we can impeach him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ohb0b, Seattle Posted by: mazel
» RE: Ohb0b, Seattle Posted by: willymack
Elite fun. Same in History and Europe.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 1, 2006 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately through-out history people have used their power to abuse citizens both on the whole and, like this incident, in person. Both parties participate and any google search will find all kinds of scandals. Not just in the ol' USA. Europe has had MANY scandals of paedophiles (usually the 'little' people are arrested but the big-shot are rarely convincted.) The infamous 'Rose Ballets' of the Low Countries and the big recent paedophile scandals in France. Not to mention the Catholic scandals. Power corrupts and, more often than not, power is desired by already corrupt people. Interestingly, agencies (CIA, the mob, the church, gov't) can use the 'sexual piccadillos' of people against them. It forces the person to agree with the party/ruler/etc lest he be 'found out'. It also reinforces his perversion and, with the increase of power and reinforcement, allows his sick 'fantasies' to become reality and the debauchery to increase. There are bunch of sick freaks out there in charge. But this is nothing new. Look how the Romans got their kicks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At least Monica was a female of legal age
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Oct 1, 2006 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought that WJC's womanizing was a bit scandalous, though altogether unworthy of the fuss that was ultimately made over it. Didn't you think that Ken Starr was a little too obsessed over the details? Which was the likely pervert?

I clicked on one of the links in this story and followed more links until I found an actual chat session (before I realized that one was included below). First, niether are emails, per se, but IM chats, as they are called. Secondly, the one I stumbled on was worse than the one offered within the article. I only read part of the worse one and don't know if I even reached the halfway point because I didn't even bother to see how long it continued. I simply lack the prurient interest.

Until today, I wondered what the fuss could be, how innapropriate these 'emails' could have been, or whether even they were being misrepresented. I am better informed now, though. If the mmm54 (or some such monicker) is Foley, the press has been mild in their condemnation.

I fear, though, that the greatest interest of many will be akin to that of Mr. Starr. Give us the juicy details! Let us, too, wallow in the perversion! Don't be selfish with the good stuff!

Another commentor, near the top, tells us that we will get the leadership we deserve, and I fear that he is correct, although certainly not the first to say as much.

Our new paradigm requires the anti-intellectual bent that our society now embodies. How else can they so easily manipulate the public will, but to reduce our deepest understanding to sloganism? A scandal such this arouses interest, but why? In these times when American culture seems reduced to the baser instincts of human nature, what is our interest here? What part of the Jerry Springer audience - oops, I meant American public - wants to hear all about the details, and then chalk it up to business as usual?

Do we now need an Amber Alert system for every youngster ever left alone with any elected leader? In this day of school shootings, family murders, corporate corruption, what is there left that would give us any particular compunction to behave significantly better than our own 'respected' leaders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

voice from the mountains
Posted by: dkentca7 on Oct 1, 2006 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found this, a report from the GAO to Congressional Requesters, Wally Herger (CA), Mark Foley (FL) and Jim Ramstad (?) dated July 31, 2006 regarding the National Sex Offender Registry. Looks like the fox likes guarding the henhouse. Anyone who wanted to look into this further would be greatly appreciated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll Tell You Why
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 2, 2006 12:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1- They care more about holding on to power than they do about the kids involved and the larger issues of exploited children, sexual predators and pedophiles.
2- They knew that if he resigned after the election they would have more time to get a candidate and money organized to replace him in a special election.
3- Until that special election, the Governor of Florida could appoint someone (a Republican).

It's all about power. They don't give a damn about anything or anybody unless it hits them where it counts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

corruption
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 2, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you expect from an administration and party that commits war crimes all over the world and gets away with it? USA politics has been turned into a crime syndicate headed by Cheney/Bush. They and their legions of hangers-on have been committing electoral, political, financial, sexual and war crimes now for years. They have seduced Lieberman and Blair to become their lap dog promoters of Judeo-Christian hegemony for thrills and profit. They are hip-deep in corruption that knows no end short of impeachment. If impeached, then we can create a real democracy for real people with real morals instead of fake ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: corruption..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Bestiality NOT pedophilia
Posted by: shangrilalad on Oct 2, 2006 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have heard from reliable sources, (staunch conservatives that is) that Foley can be forgiven his indiscretions because he limited his activities to liberal’s children. Trifling with sub-humans, pets or farm animals doesn’t call for the kind of condemnation one is hearing from the Liberal Media.

Bestiality isn’t the same thing as pedophilia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bestiality NOT pedophilia Posted by: albrechtkrausse
read Capitol Hill Blue sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Oct 2, 2006 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I was posting Capitol Hill Blue came in with an article on the very same topic

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you have a link????? Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Do you have a link?????...re link sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Culpability
Posted by: ol'Bill on Oct 2, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently retired from 30 years of child protection work, I find it interesting that the "top" seems to apply different rules to itself. Dennis Hastert and other enablers need to be held accountable, as well. I continue to be saddened at the endless number of "conservative Christian values" peddlers who are just "wolves in sheep's clothing."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

related quote from AP story
Posted by: mazel on Oct 2, 2006 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'"It really makes me nervous that they might have tried to cover this up," said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., on ABC's "This Week," adding that already "the reputation of Congress under the Republican leadership is lower than used car salesmen."'

Murtha owes a sincere apology to used car salesmen everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP
Posted by: kww355 on Oct 2, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
G-rand
O-ld
P-edophiles

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GOP...sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: GOP...sickofsleaze Posted by: kww355
» RE: GOP...sickofsleaze..Good one.. sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: GOP Posted by: yellow
» RE: GOP Posted by: Douglas
Power corrupts
Posted by: oneyedjack on Oct 2, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like the old saw states; "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Some in the media - especially in So Florida - have known (or suspected) about Foley for years. Some of his mates in Congress have know (or suspected) about Foley for years. But unless you actually get caught buggering a page in the cloakroom, or a semen stained dress wends its way to the house floor, it's all business as usual.
Now why would that not surprise anyone on this, or any other board?
Am I reading a bunch of knee jerk outrage directed at the Repugs because we hate them and they make us feel impotent; or am I viewing outrage tinged with a liberal dose of naivete? Which is it?
"Power corrupts and absolute power..." I read one poster who stated something to the effect; "I wonder how the Dems are going to blow this opportunity..." I don't know if the poster intended the pun or not, but obviously they viewed Foley's travails as 'an opportunity.'
Now, in response to that I'd have to ask this poster; if Foley rapping on an IM about glomming onto 7-1/2" is an political "opportunity" just what they hell do you call the occupation of Iraq;? The assault on the Constitution;? The assault on the poor? One could go on forever! The yellow Dems did nothing with those (political) opportunities, what in the hell makes you think they could do something with a pedophile and his yearnings for page boys? Get a grip here.
"Power corrupts and absolute power..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gingrich's sorry performance on Sunday. . .
Posted by: LeftofCenterVA on Oct 2, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gringrich's suggestion that the Republican leadership didn't take the allegations against Foley more seriously because they were afraid of being accused of gay bashing is unadultered hogwash.

First, this has nothing to do with being gay. It is more related to abuse of power, inapproriate relationships, and potentially violations of the law. Second, when have Republicans ever avoided gay bashing.

In one sentence, Gingrich manages to do what he claims the Republicans are afraid of. . .bash gays. He equates and confuses pedophilism and abuse of power, i.e., a 52 year old congressman and a 16 year old page, with being gay. These are totally unrelated to being gay.

Like Catholic bishops, it appears that the Republican leadership is more interested in protecting itself than childeren.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Foley's folly
Posted by: Tad on Oct 2, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing must hurt the REPUBLICAN PARTY. They have no decency and no shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's OK by Matt Drudge
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Oct 2, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I listened to Matt Drudge last night and he said it's OK because 16 year old boys are legal in DC. And besides, the boys were leading on the 52 year old congressman. He kept saying, "What's the world coming to." I didn't hear him mention family values though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's OK by Matt Drudge Posted by: bettyn
» RE: It's OK by Matt Drudge Posted by: jareilly
» RE: It's OK by Matt Drudge Posted by: fifiela
» RE: It's OK by Matt Drudge Posted by: vangogh69
Dubai connection
Posted by: John Walters on Oct 2, 2006 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After learning that the Dubai Royal Family enslaves young boys to be camel jockeys, I ask myself if Mark Foley has any connection to them because we know the Bush family does...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

concerned canadian
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Oct 2, 2006 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe the lack of outrage in the responses to Foley's behavious. He is a sexual deviant and predator of the worst kind. If that were my kid he'd exploited Foley would not be worrying about the size of his penis. The óh well, what the hell, just another scandal' attitude is unbelievable. America does not seem to be understanding. Everyone is waiting for the sitting government to oust itself. Have you learned nothing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: concerned canadian Posted by: bettyn
» RE: concerned canadian..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Nothing Will Happen
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Oct 2, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cenk, you said it yourself. Look at the long long long list of scandals and observe that nothing has changed.

Do you really think this time any difference has been made? I think not.

Already, the gears have been working to scoot this one under the rug, too.

To wit,

1. Tony Snow has already announced that 'we need to get all the facts' with regard to this case. You see, an IM log is not a fact. It is not evidence. It is not something they made up, so it's is false, an illusion, it's unreal. The 'real' facts have to be made by Karl Rove.

2. Foley has checked into rehab. His announcement effectively makes this equation in people's minds: 'I'm an alcoholic, thus that is what alcoholics do'. This is a false equation, of course, but people who don't know alcoholics will believe that his alcoholism makes him an ephebophile. The MSM will not separate the two from each other. Thus, in the minds of moronic news consumers they see them as equivalent. Damage done. Check one more in the Republican column.

3. An investigation will be underway very shortly, which will allow the entire admin to stay mum on this issue, as you have pointed out.

Thus, the GOP's new education slogan 'No Child's Behind Left', will be enacted, people will bitch and complain about it like they did with the other failed project, No Child Left Behind, and STILL nothing will be done about it.

Come November the neocons will have effectively covered up yet another scandal. The moronic voters will hear only that Dems love terrorists, Karl will have sprung his October surprise and we'll still be talking about its fallout, and the neocons will win yet again.

The scandals will continue as they have so far until Bush leaves office.

Then the Dems will win the WH and have to deal with an unserviceable debt, an unwinnable war in Iraq, a housing market that might not have bounced back by then...which will lead to voters being angry with Dems not having any plan to fix anything.

The neocons have already won.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 -