Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The iPod's Moment in History

By Charlie Bertsch, Tikkun. Posted September 27, 2006.


Even though it is only the latest stage in a much longer history of mobile audio, Apple has done such a thorough job of colonizing consumers' minds that many of them have now come to see that history in the company's terms.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Charlie Bertsch

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The fall of 2001 was surely one of the worst times to launch a new "lifestyle" product in the United States since World War II. Still reeling from the shock of seeing their nation's defenses breached by foreign invaders for the first time since the War of 1812, consumers had sharply curtailed spending on luxury goods. The stock market was doing poorly. And then, just when it seemed like the country's mood was beginning to stabilize, the discovery of anthrax in the nation's postal system rekindled the fear of indiscriminate terrorism. It was under these difficult circumstances that Apple CEO Steve Jobs walked on stage on October 23 -- the same day the Patriot Act was introduced on the floor of the House -- to debut a device that could either help revive the Apple brand's mystique or hasten its slide into irrelevance. But that didn't dissuade Jobs.

"Music's a part of everyone's life," he stated, "and because it's a part of everyone's life, it's a very large target market all around the world. It knows no boundaries." As Jobs went on to size up the market for digital music players and then announce the introduction of the iPod, these words continued to resonate, underscoring the ambitiousness of the company's strategy. "Everyone" is not a niche market. Five years later, Apple still has a long way to go before reaching that lofty goal. But the iPod has also turned out to be a bigger success than most people ever imagined. And it's become a part of modern society, affecting the lives of even those who don't actually own one.

Although the car radios that debuted in the early years of the Depression paved the way for all future efforts to take sound on the road; although the Sony Walkman cassette player, released in 1979, seemed like as big a deal in its day as the iPod does now; and although portable digital music players first appeared on the market back in 1998, the iPod's significance should not be underestimated. Because, even though it is only the latest stage in a much longer history of mobile audio, Apple has done such a thorough job of colonizing consumers' minds that many of them have now come to see that history in the company's terms. What the iPod makes possible stands in for what portability itself makes possible. That is why it has made the leap from newcomer to icon with astonishing brevity and is now close to attaining the lexical status of "Xerox" and "Kleenex."

It is impossible to make sense of the contemporary culture industry without putting the iPod center stage. Even those music lovers who have no interest in using one, either because they are unsatisfied with its limited fidelity or because they aren't interested in mobility, must confront the fact that the choices available to them are constrained by the iPod's influence on the market. Indeed, the very existence of traditional audiophiles is threatened, since the criteria they use for rating both equipment and recording are no longer a high priority for most listeners. Frequency response, the accuracy of microphones, the virtuosity of musicians -- the bread and butter of "serious" music magazines from the late 1940s until the popularization of the MP3 format -- have become secondary or tertiary considerations in a context where the most important thing is not how good the music sounds, but how readily it is available to you.

Significantly, when Jobs introduced the iPod back in 2001, he went out of his way to make it clear that Apple was appealing to the casual listener. "The biggest thing about iPod is that it holds 1,000 songs," he noted. "Now this is a quantum leap, because for most people it's their entire music library." Since that first iPod only held five gigabytes of music, barely more than today's much smaller iPod Nano, the presumption that the device could hold everything in a person's music library clearly overlapped with Jobs's earlier comment that, "music is a part of everyone's life." When you're marketing to everyone, you're interested in what works for "most people" instead of what works best for the people who care most.

This brings us back to the apparent ill-timing of the product's debut. As Apple's recent financial fortunes make clear, the fall of 2001 may actually have been the best time to introduce this particular "lifestyle" product. The news stories that were surely a distraction for Jobs's audience that day contributed to a mood that made the iPod seem like the perfect technology for the moment. Because, as his presentation made clear, what the iPod's combination of speed and size was really intended to make possible was the transformation of music into shelter. The prospect of bringing your whole music library with you is only attractive if circumstances prevent you from hearing it at home.


Digg!

Charlie Bertsch is Tikkun's music editor and assistant professor of English at the University of Arizona. A co-editor of Bad Subjects: Political Education for Everyday Life, Bertsch is currently putting the final touches on a book about punk.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One among many
Posted by: talkville on Sep 27, 2006 1:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Technology" has reached the status of the Fetish and History seems to have become an issue of property-rights. I recall a refrain of a song performed a few years back (I don't listen to it on an iPod): "...and where do we go from here?"

Seems a 50 cent soda is much easier to distribute than a portion of rice or beans in our rich progressing world. Apple Corp. is only one amongst many. How music soothes the savage soul!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One among many Posted by: gazooks
» RE: One among many Posted by: talkville
It's Eden all over again!
Posted by: tanstaafl28 on Sep 27, 2006 2:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ohh, the horror! The people have been indoctrinated by yet another evil corporate, commercialized, cultural icon determined to end all life as we know it! We shall rue the day we ever wanted to bring "home" with us in the form of our favorite music!

We're not "...eating of the forbidden fruit..." for the first time folks and, guess what? We're not done being wowed by the next great gadget to revolutionize the way we go about our lives. Ever since the wheel, sliced bread, and the unbreakable plastic comb, we've got a long history of embracing the latest fad and integrating it into our everyday lives, and yet somehow, we don't seem to be so bad off.

Is it any wonder most progressives can't ever seem to get a grip on anything when so many are confused as to what's important, and what's merely "filler" posing as social commentary?

And no, you can't borrow my ipod either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Eden all over again! Posted by: sofla100
not
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 27, 2006 2:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To ipod or not to ipod, that is the question. From my point of view it is a good thing for others to have them for it lessens my having to listen to booming bass coming from SUVs driven by folks who are going deaf. For myself I will not have an ipod because I would rather think or read or write than listen to music brainwashing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why not? Posted by: charlief
» RE: Why not? Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Why not? Posted by: kittynboi
» It's Technology & is Neutral Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: not Posted by: andrewgirma
Objection
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 27, 2006 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author needs to stay within their area of expertise, which is obviously not audio.
Even those music lovers who have no interest in using one, either because they are unsatisfied with its limited fidelity or because they aren't interested in mobility, must confront the fact that the choices available to them are constrained by the iPod's influence on the market.

The iPod is capable of audio fidelity at a level equal to or better than the stereo equipment in the homes of 99.8% of it's owners, the only audio limitation in hardware coming from the earbuds. I use mine in the car or at home with Bose QuietComfort Headphones and the quality is very good.

While it is true that the music sold via the online store is in a format of less than CD quality, that is not a limitation imposed by the iPod. The iTunes software that feeds the iPod allows the user the choice of 5 different audio codecs with an almost unlimited variety of bit-rates for music you rip from your own CDs. From CD quality to a bad phone line, the user has the choice of more capacity with lower quality or higher quality with a smaller capacity.

The iPod is a success not because Apple was first (they were not), but because they were the first to get it right. Unlike everyone else, they put the user in control and have made continuous improvements to the product.

Next time write about what you know to be true, not what you assume to be true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Objection Posted by: kittynboi
This argument misses the point
Posted by: AWoronczuk on Sep 27, 2006 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't blame the IPOD for these social interactions. The use of the ipod to decrease or avoid social interaction is a byproduct of our modern day socialization through technology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about Microsoft and the American ideal of lying, cheating and stealing
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Sep 27, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Microsoft stole the Apple Applicaiton Programming Interface routines down to the words and arguements of it's routines to give the graphical user interface it has today. It stole DEC's VMS security to create Windows NT. It bought the rest of technology. Intel stole DECs internal processing hardware and was fined $500M. What is not stolen is bought out. No innovation here.

America is the land of liars, cheaters and thieves. I am for anyone that can come out with a half way decent idea that doesn't lift information directly but can do things better. Innovation is loosing to corporate coruption and the people resemble the companies.

Just as the FASB might just as well issue opinions to thin air, American people have stood behind liars, thieves and cheaters in politics, banking and industry. There is truth in lies. Pointing a finger at a download device is pathetic. The cost of the songs is considerably cheaper than buying whole CDs. TI's pro/consumer-audio section has device components that will continue to make affordible real high fidelity products available for very little money (bet most audiophiles don't know that their $5000-$50000 DAC have a brain that costs less than $2.00).

Our history is fabricated with lies, our patriotism is based upon nationalism that has been created for the masses. Unless people don't think like the cows they are now, this country is in a heap of trouble. There is a reason why the rest of the world is mad at the US and it isn't for our freedoms.

Complaining about the iPod is nothing but noise in a world where we need to adress far more important issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting Points, Though Of Questionable Validity
Posted by: Wacre on Sep 27, 2006 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found the points raised interesting, though not terribly valid because as the current owner of two ipods (a Mini and video model) I find them no more isolating than if I was not wearing them at all.

That is because most Americans are so balkanized as it is (I'm gay, straight, black, white, Korean, chinese, Republican, Democrat, Green, rich, poor, etc) that I suspect whether or not a person walks around with a portable music player is going to make a whit of difference.

Everyone is so busy trying to be something or other that even when we do hear what the other person is saying we often aren't really listening; instead we have already moved on to how whatever was said could potentially effect us.

This reminds me somewhat of the argument against guns. While guns do make it significantly easier to kill someone (which is why I think that they should be illegal) they by no means do it by themselves (there are cases of guns falling and going off and hitting someone, but those situations are relatively rare, I would like to think).

Essentially, my point is, if people were able to step away from their egos and whatever identity/societal construct they choose to wear at any given moment, then I suspect things like iPod would have little, if any, effect upon people relating to each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow. Zero accountability for humans
Posted by: metavurt on Sep 27, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is hilarious. The author could have been talking about cell phone use, which has become, in the drivers seat, an influence just as dangerous as drunk driving.

If you're a progressive, but can't handle technology, moved to a Third World country and do some good work there. Seriously.

America is *not* about a non-technological culture. Hasn't been for.... DECADES.

With each new advance, for some reason there's multitudes of new fears.

The iPod is essentially a hard drive or a flash drive that holds data. It has software on its chip that make it an easy music player. That is all.

How you use it is up to you. Some of the quotes are just downright hilarious in the article and the comments following. The iPod isn't a machine that chooses your music for you and MAKES you listen for hours on end! It's not a soul-sucker! Like I posted in response to another comment, some of my nicest times have been on the bus to/from work because I've got my fave opera massaging my ears.

The iPod, in and of itself does NOT control you! Motherofgod get a grip. We control what we do/choose/listen to and if you find that people are choosing to listen to their iPod rather than have a conversation with the person next to them at the coffee shop, then consider that a reflection of our values as a society, not the dastardly deeds of some little piece of technology.

Again - you could have written this about the cell phone, and THEN some. I've had more rude encounters related to cell phone use than I have had with iPod use. Multiples of instances.

The culprit, in all cases, is the human being using the device. If a person refuses to turn off their music to hear you better, it is they who are choosing to not be polite; if they take a phone call during a conversation with you and it's not an emergency or something of a similar degree of importance, again - it's they who are choosing to be a particular way. Not the technology.

Point the finger where it should be pointed when there is a moment of disconnect, disrespect, or a vacant stare. At us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU!!! Posted by: kwfryatl
» iPods Empower Posted by: PeaceLove
I love the iPod
Posted by: sasha40 on Sep 27, 2006 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have an original iPod from 2001. A friend gave it to me in 2003 when he and his wife upgraded. The thing has worked without a battery change ever since. It has been used to death, dropped on the floor, and the battery has been completely run down more times than I can possibly count. Every so often it seems dead, but it always comes back to life.

It's true that there are some noticeable sound differences between MP3s and CD audio tracks, but so are there between CDs and vinyl records (especially older, thicker records with deep grooves), but most people would not notice, especially with decent speakers or headphones. Not only that, but even if the iPod didn't exist, lots of people would still be listening to music in the MP3 format.

I definitely take exception to the idea that the iPod's technology somehows reduces the artistic merit of the work being listened to. Considering the banality of most radio today, I would think that people making their own decisions about what to listen to would be a good thing, and in a package smaller than a pack of cigarettes. If being plugged in is creepy, blame the Walkman that started it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I love the iPod Posted by: polyquat50
mystified by portable music
Posted by: Andrew Edwards on Sep 27, 2006 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have yet to understand the appeal of listening to music via headphones, other than very occasionally in order to obliterate all other sensory experience.

I love Apple products generally and think the iPod is an example of technology genius. But I lament that so many find it so appealing to ignore the natural sounds around them in favor of manufactured, productized sounds made in order to manipulate their senses.

Rather than seeming assertive and hip, it seems submissive and lonesome.

--Andrew Edwards
Tempest Press

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mystified by portable music Posted by: toomuchlike
My iPod keeps me sane
Posted by: funtime42 on Sep 27, 2006 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm agorophobic - I'm managing it pretty well by carrying my music library with me. When I start to feel overwhelmed, I can dial in one of dozens of songlists and mentally I'm immediately someplace I control. My iPod (and iTunes on my work computer) makes it possible for me to ride a vanpool with 13 other people without wanting to jump out the window, manage a help desk that serves hundreds of users, walk into a shopping mall without having a panic attack, and lets me drive on a crowded interstate with a sense of calm.

iPods aren't about isolation for me - it's about having enough control over some part of my environment that I can survive when the rest of it is being controlled by others.

I don't have panic attacks any more. I haven't needed medication in years. My BP is a lovely 104/70. 5000+ songs and podcasts keep me sane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Knock I-Pods
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 27, 2006 5:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with AlterNet about 90% plus of the time, but this time must disagree with this particular article. Technology, in my view, must be differentiated between helpful and not helpful, good and bad. The IPod has made commuting bearable for many who must commute 2 plus hours to work each day. If you rip CD's, the fidelity is fantastic. On downloads you can choose the bit rate which controls quality. It must be pointed out that the IPod never developed without competition. Creative, I-River and others have competing MP3 players, but the IPod is without doubt the best. The author would have had a better point if it were pointed out that Apple, via I-Tunes, does monopolize because of how I-Tunes works just with I-Pod's, but this is a far cry from criticizing the IPod itself. By the way, the I-Pod is great for audiobooks, Democracy Now downloads, podcasts of every type imaginable. So, it is not just for music at all. You want people to be informed of the news and alternate viewpoints, the I-Pod is a great vehicle for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't Knock I-Pods Posted by: andrewgirma
Opposite is true
Posted by: Waterbug on Sep 28, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have missed the whole picture by failing to note the explosion in audio creation that coincides with this personal consumption. Podcasting is challenging radio for the medium by which we consume music and information. There are many progressive audio and video podcasts that are being shared. This is a social medium. Read Daniel Pink's A Whole New Mind to put the podcasting phenomenon in proper context.

BTW, is it true that iPod is reaching "Kleenex" status and we should always demand content in non-proprietary formats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

electronic waste and toxic trash
Posted by: maroot on Sep 28, 2006 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of you posters seem really wounded by any criticism of Apple or high-tech; thought you might be interested in the following...

http://www.computertakeback.com
Apple Responds to Pressure from Consumers on Recycling!
[condensed] Apple should go all the way. It should set some public goals for how much equipment they will take back. It should stop lobbying against producer responsibility legislation. Apple lobbied against Washington state e-waste recycling legislation and continues to lobby against takeback bills. More info.

http://www.svtc.org/cleancc/
Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition's Clean Computer Campaign page, with reports on the environmental, labor, and human rights problems associated with the high-tech industry, and more info on responsible recycling.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/ green-electronics-guide-ewaste250806
Greenpeace's guide to "green electronics." The biggest names in electronics have just sat their first global exam on their green credentials. Ranked on their use of toxic chemicals and electronic waste (e-waste) policies only Dell and Nokia scraped a barely respectable score while Apple, Motorola and Lenovo flunked the test to finish bottom of the class.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0413-27.htm
"Electronic Waste a Ticking Time Bomb" (4/06)
Background on the issue of toxics and e-waste, that addresses the iPod.

"A similar cycle of improvement, consumption and obsolescence defines all successful electronic products. And because manufacturers are aware of their products' increasingly short life spans, they usually "underbuild" the more expensive components to save money. After about a year, for example, the batteries of iPods start losing their capacity to hold a charge. True, Apple has a cumbersome mail-in program that allows you replace the battery for $60. But iPods are not meant to be repaired. They are meant to be replaced by newer models and thrown away. That's why Apple seals the battery inside the iPod case. And that's why some iPod customers are now very angry."

[snip]

"Manufacturers, of course, want you to spend your money. And nothing discourages them from creating mountains of electronic waste while they encourage you to do just that. Unlike Europe, the United States has no electronic-waste laws that compel manufacturers to disassemble their discarded products to make it possible to recycle them.

This problem has become enormous and extremely dangerous, because electronic devices contain permanent toxins such as lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium and barium. By 2009, 250 million computers will become obsolete. By that time, 300 million TVs will have to be replaced with digital upgrades. At about 11 pounds each, TV screens contain much more lead than computer monitors do. The total lead in discarded computers and analog TVs will amount to 4 million to 5 million tons -- and it will soon be leaching into groundwater near you."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reasons You Should Own an iPod
Posted by: dreabfly on Sep 28, 2006 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. You can buy music by independent artists rather than just mainstream corporate controlled ones too busy taking their clothes off to be real musicians.
2. Though environmentalism issues about the pod itself can be debated, you can buy music without all the excessive packaging (including all the wood you use storing the damn things in your house).
3. My pod works in my office, in my home, in my car, and anywhere else I want it to without having to be an ultra consumer and buy a boombox or CD player for each location.
4. You can load your pod with music that other people will NEVER hear and share it with them wherever you go. (Did this on a plane last week and it always makes people smile).
5. Every professional audio engineer I know owns one and doesn't seem to think the quality will ever matter to anyone who isn't at least a mix or mastering engineer.
6. If charged and used regularly your pod will last you a good long time. Mine is a first generation and still going strong.
7. You don't risk losing your precious collection of CDs by having to transport it around (happened to me) or GASP! buy or make another copy to use in another location (more waste).
8. Musicians will thank you because we are ever being screwed by the music system and pods have made a significant difference to our sales and availability. (I have sold more music digitally this year than hard copies).
9. You will forever be free from the evil radio empire - never needing to ever turn it on again. Goodbye advertisements!
10. Blocking out a world that is increasingly hate filled, mind-numbing, sex-enthralled, and soul-wrenchingly dominated by consumerist propoganda so that one may listen to well-crafted art of one's liking can only be a good thing.

As far as inconsiderate use goes - don't get me started. Why doesn't the author consider writing an article about cell phone use in elevators, bathrooms, restaurants, and everywhere else under the sun? At least pod wearers are not imposing their realities on other people.

And if I worked at Starbucks, I'd want to block out the customers, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

do all progressives have to think alike?
Posted by: dauphin534 on Sep 28, 2006 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are marginalized views always attacked on this site for giving progressives a bad name?
I think this is an interesting article that raises some very trues observations about our times.
So you have an ipod and you love it. so this writer thinks everyone doing the same thing is creepy. so what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

la mer
Posted by: la mer on Sep 28, 2006 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Technology is great.
But--
I teach basic skills in one of L.A. county's better community colleges and I must tell you that my students know their music and the technology associated with its convenience but they have very low level literacy skills. Not only are we seeing more and more students who don't know how to read or write beyond a sixth grade level, but their social, political and economic literacy levels are in the basement. So many Americans do not know how our government works and they pay absolutely no attention what is happening in the country as a whole or in the world until it comes and bites them on the ass. But they've got music to play as our ship sinks---
We can try to blame our targets of the moment, but when it comes right down to it the fact is we've traded away our responsibilities as citizens for our pleasures as consumers---

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: la mer Posted by: dreabfly
» RE: la mer Posted by: kittynboi
Nothing New Under the City Streets
Posted by: Chelt on Nov 5, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The claims of novelty go just a little too far. I think that there's nothing new under the sun -- or, perhaps, nothing new under the city streets.

On the subway, I'm always struck by the gaze of commuters, a kind of blank stare looking at nothing in particular, aided perhaps by an iPod or a newspaper or a paperback novel, but one that ignores the dozens of other people sharing the same car. The essay describes this kind of antisocial gaze.

But this is an old gaze. It might be as old as the industrial city; it might go back to Babylon. Walker Evans captures it perfectly in his Subway Portraits series of photographs taken with a hidden camera. The commuters he depicts might wear different fashions -- nearly every man wears a hat and a suit jacket, nearly every woman has long gloves -- but these people all wear the same blank gaze that commuters carry today. A few of these people read newspapers, or hold the papers folded in their laps. Most of them simply stare into space, with no reading material required. None of them needs an iPod. Anxiety? Nothing new either. Walker Evan's pictures come from a country still fighting its way out from the Depression, with one world war looming and the last one still fresh in public memory.

Walker Evans refrained from publishing these pictures for about three decades because he felt he had captured people in exceptionally private moments. Do not mistake the prop for the social condition.

Bertsch: "As anyone who has spent some time sitting in a Star-bucks can tell you, the customers who work there use iPods to minimize the possibility for social interaction."

Well, yes. That's the key.

The iPod isn't the new element. Neither is this ancient desire for privacy in public spaces. What's new is people working in these particular configurations of public spaces.

The essay reads the social conditions of a coffee house well, but I see this as an increase in camaraderie rather than the construction of new walls. The iPod merely shores up the barriers as more activities find their way into these in-between environments. They're not entirely new. Precedents include the lending libraries, municipal baths, and even community parks and amusement parks. One of the oldest forms is the promenade, a place where one can see others and be seen, but an environment where people are in constant motion, unable to speak beyond a brief exchange of formalities.

Bertsch: "Maybe what these listeners want is to be seen wanting both company and solitude."

Exactly. In this very old type of place, one finds mostly solitude and a small measure of company. They are not new. Nor are more social environments declining.

How often have you seen someone listening to an iPod in a bar? The bar with alcoholic beverages and sappy music on tap looks like the coffee house. Both sell overpriced liquid refreshments that alter mood and spirit, and which bring some risk of addiction. The difference comes in the intangibles: the coffee house sells beverages and a well-positioned seat, perhaps with a good view of the action on a street, while the other sells drinks and social interaction, and often sits in a cellar.

By the time that Mr. Bertsch starts talking about "the era of homeland insecurity," he's lost me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]