Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Gitmo From the Inside

By Onnesha Roychoudhuri, AlterNet. Posted September 27, 2006.


An innocent man talks about his three years as a detainee and wonders if he can ever learn to forgive his American captors.
42182story
42182_story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Onnesha Roychoudhuri

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Moazzam Begg was abducted from his home in the middle of the night on Jan. 31, 2002, he thought he was being kidnapped by thugs. Those thugs turned out to be the U.S. military and CIA. Begg was shuffled from Kandahar to Bagram to Guantanamo and held for three years before he was finally released in January 2005. As with the majority of the other detainees, Begg was never charged with any crime.

He and others endured routine physical and psychological torture, indefinite imprisonment, and solitary confinement. While it's nearly impossible to fathom emerging from years of this abuse and wrongful imprisonment, it is perhaps even more of a stretch to imagine being capable of forgiving your captors. Begg’s new book, "Enemy Combatant: A British Muslim's Journey to Guantanamo and Back," co-written with Victoria Brittain, puts his experience in context of the broader war on terror. As one of the few English-speaking detainees, Begg is a powerful witness to the massive failure of U.S. and British military intelligence in preventing terrorism.

Onnesha Roychoudhuri: When did you first decide you were going to write this book?

Moazzam Begg: Oddly enough, the suggestions to write the book came from U.S. soldiers, interrogators, and other detainees. They were fascinated by the story, by my experiences. The more open-minded ones even understood that writing about this episode is a very important piece of history.

Roychoudhuri: Can you take me to the beginnings of your story? What led you to Afghanistan and Pakistan? Were you were abducted and taken to Kandahar?

Begg: In 2000, I had already begun working on a project to build wells in the northwest region of Afghanistan. At that time, there were some severe droughts. We had built over ten wells as a community from here where I lived with my family and other members. We'd also begun a project to build a school for girls in Kabul, which was a novelty because we were all told that the Taliban wouldn't allow female education. That's something that my wife and I had invested in and that we pursued as a family in 2001when we moved there to continue to help the progress of the school.

Roychoudhuri: You were first abducted in Pakistan. Can you describe what happened?

Begg: We had evacuated to Pakistan after the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan. Pakistan is where my parents are from, and I speak Urdu, so it was easy for me to be there. I was safe for a few months until I was abducted on the night of Jan. 31, 2002. There was a knock on the door, [and] I answered to be faced with people pointing guns. They pushed me to the ground, dragged me across the floor, took me into the front room, put a bag over my head, bound my legs and wrists, and then carried me off into the back of this vehicle.

Roychoudhuri: What were you thinking at the time?

Begg: That this was a kidnapping. I thought that they were local gangsters. They didn't identify themselves, ask me who I was, or show identification and they didn't search me. For the first ten minutes, I thought that these guys were gangsters until one of them pulled my hood up.

There was a Caucasian trying to look like a local and doing a pretty bad job at it. He had this black thing wrapped around his head in a style that no local would ever do; it just looked funny. It was funny and frightening all at the same time. He produced handcuffs and said that he was an American, and that he got the handcuffs from one of the wives of the 9/11 victims who had told him to go catch the perpetrators. So then I realized that this was obviously the CIA, and that things were going to get worse probably before they got better.

Overkill is a good description of how people reacted in the broader picture of both the terrible terrorist attacks, but also the response to that attack. We occupied two countries with populations in total of over 30 or 40 million. That's a huge overreaction.

Roychoudhuri: When you were first kidnapped, you were taken to a Pakistani jail. What happened there?

Begg: I was afraid of being in Pakistani custody because it's well-known that you get beaten. They're notorious for getting all kinds of confessions. At first, I was glad that there were Americans there. But the irony is that the Pakistanis were extremely apologetic, they called me "son," they said they felt bad about what was happened, that I was fully legal in the country as far as they were concerned. But they said the Americans were telling them to do this, and that they have to be either with them, as the president said, or against them. The great paradox was that the second I was transferred to U.S. custody, that's when the brutality began.

Roychoudhuri: From Pakistan, you were sent to Kandahar, then Bagram?

Begg: I was held in Kandahar for about six weeks. That was the most brutal processing experience I had. When I was held by the Pakistanis, they didn't shackle me, they just put a towel over my head when I was moving around so I couldn't see things. But with the Americans, it was the legs shackled, hands behind your back, clothes torn off with a knife, dogs barking, being beaten, punched, shaved, having trophy photographs taken by soldiers, and being naked and interrogated. I could never have imagined this was how the United States treated people. It was clear that the process of dehumanization was already in effect from the moment I reached Kandahar.

I was held [at Bagram] between 10 and 11 months before I was transferred to Guantanamo. The Bagram facility was an old Russian warehouse, there was no natural light. For almost a year, I didn't get to see any natural light.

Roychoudhuri: Every time you were moved, was there a similar procedure?

Begg: Yes, you were sensory deprived. You would be disoriented as to where you were going, as to what you were hearing and your ability to speak. All of those senses were impaired. And of course, they shackled you with what they call the three piece suit: a shackle around the legs, around the waist, and around the wrists, all of which are attached to the waist.

We were stripped quite regularly and searched regularly in all crevices.

Roychoudhuri: I know it's difficult to talk about, but it seems evident that this was part of a broader attempt to humiliate the detainees.

Begg: I think so. President Bush hasn't denied it. He says we don't condone torture. But in my estimation, what happened in Bagram and Kandahar certainly constitutes all of those things -- psychological and physical torture as well as cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment. My evidence for that is the culmination of is this type of behavior in the deaths of two detainees. There have been heavily documented cases of people who died in Bagram, one of which I was interviewed for by intelligence people who are bringing a murder case forth.

My other experience was when I was threatened be sent to Egypt in order to face further torture. That was where a man previously (Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi) had been sent and tortured. He confessed under torture that al Qaeda was trying to provide Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction. That was used as a justification to enter Iraq. These things were very close to me. I was prospectively going to Egypt myself. That was probably one of my worst fears.

Roychoudhuri: You faced roughly 300 interviews in three years. In the book, you discuss how fixated the interrogators seemed to be in connecting all Muslim groups to al Qaeda.

Begg: Not every interrogation was a classic interrogation. A lot of them were just curious soldiers and interrogators who wanted to speak to the British guy. But certainly, I tried in vain to explain there are all sorts of Muslim groups, all sorts of places in the world where Muslims are challenging their occupations. So, to accuse them all of being synonymous with terrorism is the height of unintelligence. What you're doing is painting us all with the same brush and saying we're all responsible, and by doing this you're making yourselves many more enemies than you ever had after 9/11.

Roychoudhuri: Was there a standard procedure for the interrogations?

Begg: There were occasions when the CIA and the FBI sat together with military intelligence. But for the most part it was clear to me that they were not cooperating with one another. Whenever each alphabet agency came to ask their questions, and I answered them, they acted like it was the first time they were hearing this. I came across FBI agents who were very angry with the CIA, and vice versa. They made it quite plain that they didn't like the interference.

A British government foreign office representative came with a member of MI5. He asked me what the name of my headmaster at school was, as if to say there was some serious doubt as to whether I was British or not. I asked him, "Why has it taken you so long to come here?" And he said, "Why do you think?" I thought, if I knew the answer to that question, why the hell would I be asking you? I don't know. Perhaps he was alluding to the possibility that the Americans weren't cooperating.

Roychoudhuri: There was only one person you came across during your detainment that claimed any connection to al-Qaeda, a man named Uthman al-Harbi.

Begg: The only one I know of in Guantanamo who has said as much. Even in his case, I think he thinks himself to be more than he really is. That's the estimation that the interrogators seemed to have of him. He's not on the radar, not on the most wanted list or anything like that. Perhaps he's someone [who] agrees with the ideology of al Qaeda, but as far as somebody who has actually done anything, I don't know that he's very useful.

Roychoudhuri: He actually says that no one else in Guantanamo is al Qaeda.

Begg: Well, why would there be? Al Qaeda, before all of this, was a very small organization. If you go to the FBI website before 9/11, you'll see that they have the names of the most wanted, but it's a small organization. Now, al Qaeda has now become synonymous with every organization in the world. The reality is that it's much easier to put everybody under this label whereas you could say people use their methodology or synthesize this. But, to say they're a part of the organization is, I don't think, very useful thinking.

Roychoudhuri: What were some of the ways you coped while you were being held? I know you mentioned greeting every detainee in Guantanamo.

Begg: I didn't experience it for very long, but for the time I did, it was a solidarity between the detainees. It was based on Muslim or Islamic ethics, and it would begin of course with phrase "As-salaam Alaikum" which means "peace to you." Then, we would ask each detainee individually, even if there happen to be 40 on the other side that you can't see because they're on a different block, "How are you, how did you sleep, how is your day?" Just before the meal, everybody would shout out the Arab equivalent of "bon appetit." It was quite amazing because you couldn't even see the face behind the voice on the other side, and often these were people of many different nationalities.

Roychoudhuri: Did you ever lose your composure?

Begg: There was an occasion where I had an anxiety attack. I had temporarily lost sanity. I punched and kicked the walls, screamed and cried. A military psychiatrist came along and sat down looking very attentive and asked me, "558, have you ever thought about hurting yourself?" I said, "No, not really. Not willingly."

And then she said, "Have you thought about suicide?" I said, "No."

She said, "Have you thought about getting your trousers and threading them with your sheets and then tying that around your neck, and tying it to the top of your cell and then jumping off the ledge?" I said, "No, not until you put it into my mind." She said, "Well, I was just wondering." I don't know whether she was completely inept and stupid, or whether there was something much more sinister she wanted to convey.

Roychoudhuri: I want you talk about your ability to forge friendships while you were being detained. Was it strange to befriend guards and interrogators who had a positive interaction with you, but were very violent with others?

Begg: That's probably one of the hardest things to deal with. I like to look at the good in everybody, including the guards. Yet, when I hear things, it's so difficult in my mind to regard them in the same way. But all I have is my own experiences and not other people's experiences.

One of the first guards who ever befriended me in Kandahar was a Southern redneck for all intents and purposes, but with one little difference -- he grew up on a Cherokee reservation. He said that when he saw us, he empathized with our plight. He said it reminded him of his people -- the Cherokee -- and how they had been demonized, expelled from their land, and thrown into reservations because they spoke different languages, had different cultures and different colored skin. Yet, he was one of the people who had, by the time his tour was ending, become so desensitized that it was easy for him to beat one of the detainees to the point where, I believe, it led to his death. I saw him dragging the body of a detainee with another soldier across the cell into the medicine room, and then he was carried out on a stretcher with his face covered, not moving at all.

[The Cherokee guard] came into work a few days afterward and told me that he had administered martial-arts-style strikes onto this guy. It was almost as if he was trying to justify himself. He was saying about the guy, "I don't believe he tried to escape, he shouldn't have tried to escape." I think he clearly felt bad about what he had done. But he felt justified in telling me because he thought I was one of the people who would have understood. You know, this guy tried to escape. You understand, you speak English. I can relate to you a lot easier. Perhaps that was in his mind. I don't know.

Roychoudhuri: Being English-speaking seemed to be both a blessing and burden to you. You could communicate better; it also caused some of the guards to assume you must be some sort of criminal mastermind.

Begg: With some of the guards I had the kind of relationship where we could joke. They'd go around saying, "Look, there's a British assassin." I knew they were joking, and they knew I was joking, and we took it all in good cheer. But of course, these types of things get filtered to a guard who doesn't realize this. From him, it goes to an interrogator. When the interrogator finds out, he thinks he's struck gold, that a person has actually admitted to being an assassin. So the rumor was that I was an assassin, that I was a graduate of Oxford, that I was a black belt in various forms of martial arts, that I could speak ten different languages, and that I was al Qaeda's top man.

All of these things are based on some truth. I did do jujitsu, but I only got a green belt, I speak three languages -- Urdu, Arabic, and English. My wife is Arab, my parents are from India, and I'm from the U.K., so it's not surprising that I speak those languages. I'm not a high level al-Qaeda operative, but I'm the perfect anti-hero they're looking for. To put that label on an Afghan villager, who has lived in Afghanistan all his life and is only worried about where he's going to get the next meal for his goat, doesn't make sense.

Roychoudhuri: Some of this miscommunication seems to have its root in supreme idiocy. Can you give an example of an experience in which someone's lack of knowledge led to an accusation? I was thinking in particular of your use of the work "pixelated."

Begg: [laughing] They had taken my computer from my home in Pakistan, and they had miraculously undeleted a whole lot pictures and asked me why I had them. I couldn't tell them straight away because nobody knows what all the graphic image files they have on their computer are. So, I looked at one particular picture and said, "Oh, that looks a bit pixelated, I can't see it properly." And the major who was in charge at that time, who, from that point on, I called Major Idiot, said, "Well, I wouldn't know that word. It obviously means you know a lot about computers because not many people I know would know the term 'pixelated.'" My 7-year-old daughter knows about pixels. They learn about these things in school; why would that make me an expert on computers? He just jumped to these conclusions.

He also jumped to conclusions because there was a picture of the Pope among many of the other pictures on my hard drive. My homepage is the BBC World Service, so anything in current affairs was stored in the cache memory files, and he says to me, "If anything happens to the Pope, I'll break all your fingers. I'm a Catholic." And I said, "Well, bully for you, mate. I'm really glad that you're a Catholic, but what's that got to do with me? Do you think I'm working on a plot to convert the Pope to Islam or something? What is that you're so afraid of?"

Roychoudhuri: You have said in other interviews that you coped with your experiences in part by thinking about it philosophically.

Begg: There was a guard, actually, a Southern Baptist, a very decent guy, with me anyway, and he used to say that when life's troubles and difficulties face you, the first thing people ask is, "Why me?" He'd say, "Well, why not me?" He was talking about all his difficulties in his own life. I thought about that quite a bit.

But nevertheless, I think that one feeling always prevails: What did I do to these guys? What have I done to deserve this? It was just the feeling of being in this limbo, not knowing when I was going to go home, waiting, agonizing, months on end sometimes for communication from home which came sometimes a year after letters had been written. Even then it had been obscured by the censorship department.

Roychoudhuri: That included a letter from your daughter, right?

Begg: I have that letter right here. It's a letter she wrote to me when she was 7. Most of it has been blocked out. The only legible thing that remains is "I love you, Dad." I showed her this letter when I brought it back with me and asked her what it said. She said, "I wrote a poem: One, two, three, four, five, once I caught a fish alive. Six, seven, eight, nine, ten, then I let it go again." And I thought, oh, I see, the American military must have thought this was some sort of enigmatic code. I actually showed this letter to Gen. Jay Hood, the former commander of Guantanamo when he came to visit my cell. I asked him what it is that he feared from a 7-year-old girl. He was embarrassed. He didn't know what to say.

Roychoudhuri: How have you adjusted since being released? What are your plans for the future?

Begg: I value my time alone more than I ever did before. I need to be alone often. There are days when I find myself pacing up and down -- three steps one way, three steps back and back again. That developed when from the quarters I was in. Sometimes I find I'm doing it completely unconsciously.

I plan to keep lecturing up and down the country and talking to the media about Muslims, Guantanamo, and the war on terror. My work is cut out for me. It's sad in one sense because it means I am confined to this identity of former Guantanamo detainee.

Roychoudhuri: I know one of the lawyers that you've worked closely with. Clive Stafford Smith has said that you need think about forgiveness if you want to put this behind you. How do you think of the concept of forgiveness at this point?

Begg: I think about it all the time. Can I forgive, can I forgive? Just yesterday, I was thinking about when I was in Bagram. Specifically, when there was a woman screaming in the next room, and I thought it was my wife, and they had the audacity to say, "Do you think your family is safe?"

Just from that alone, I feel an intense amount of hatred. But then it gets cooled down when I'm sitting with my family and I see my children and my home, and think of humanity in the way I'd like to. It all gets washed away. So, to me, forgiveness on my part is easy in a sense because I'm free. But the hard part is that I can't forgive them for what they're doing to other people. When I was being held, the hardest thing for me wasn't my own humiliation, it was watching other people's. It was watching and being impotent, not being able to do anything to stop somebody else's humiliation, to stop somebody else from being beaten.

I can't be completely forgiving until people are released and come back to their homes with their families and their loved ones. Until that point, I only forgive them myself.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Onnesha Roychoudhuri is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer. A former assistant editor at AlterNet, she has also written for MotherJones.com, Women's e-News and PopMatters.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stand up and be counted (Maybe)
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 27, 2006 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this the reason why so many people on AlterNet don't use their real names? Are you afraid of getting a knock on your door in the middle of the night, like this poor guy, and being hauled off in the middle of the night for some interragation in a far off land?

Ha! Cowards! Stand up and be counted!

Sincerely,
John Smith

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THE GEORGE W. BUSH FAN CLUB Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: THE GEORGE W. BUSH FAN CLUB Posted by: talkville
» Well, yeah! Posted by: Lizmv
» RE: Well, yeah! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Well, yeah! Posted by: bgawboy
» RE: Well, yeah! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Well, yeah!..sickofsleaze what's so.. Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
A significant and important read
Posted by: talkville on Sep 27, 2006 12:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although this is a 'subjective' report and it will be attacked and countered by many of our 'enlightened and self-interested' compatriots, I can only hope that its content be carefully and thoughtfully considered by as many readers as possible. It's terribly disconcerting that this man's report is referred to as a 'story'. This, to him as to all of us human beings, is much, much more than a 'story'. Among other things, it is living (or dying) in our modern and so enlightened period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

military and CIA
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 27, 2006 1:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"he thought he was being kidnapped by thugs." He was right, he was kidnapped by military and CIA thugs financed by our tax dollars. Impeach the thug government that had him kidnapped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 27, 2006 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm astounded by the reaction to this story. When I saw the heading of Tom Degan's post. I said", "At last somebody on this board is for action". What a disappointment. Not one poster has mentioned torture. Not one is angered by torture. Not one seems to feel responsible as a citizen for torture carried out in his/her name. Liberals like to compare Republicans to Nazis but are liberals or anyone else who condone torture any better? I think that any person who claims to be human should be against torture unequivically.

You can't say, "I'm not guilty because I didn't vote for Bush". You are guilty because you're silent. Literally take a stand against the government and be counted. Are you afraid that you're in a minority? If you are, do you want to be counted as one of the barbaric horde? Will your conscience allow it?

We can at least try to take control of the government. We can let them know that we as individuals have the guts to oppose them openly. Join The Lincoln Initiative put your name on record against torture. Tell both parties that you can't vote for a party that doesn't uphold The Geneva Convention.

You don't have to go into the street and face the riot squads. All that you have to do is write one e-mail addressed to both parties and then e-mail your friends and family and ask them to join the movement. It costs nothing and takes five minutes of your time.

Click on Do it now. There you'll find sample e-mails and the necessary addresses. Do it today; sleep better tonight.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amazing? Why? Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Amazing? Why? Posted by: rinthy
Other Detainees
Posted by: Sparks on Sep 27, 2006 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read other accounts of Gauntanamo detainees and this does not go into detail regarding what sorts of torture are being used. Allegations I am aware of include US medical personnel intentionally maiming prisoners in the course treatment, administering contaminated blood transfusions, female soldiers smearing menstrual blood on detainees in a manner which amounts to sexual abuse. Plus I resent the portion of the article which refers to the soldiers beating a man a death as a result of being ”desensitized”. It reminds me of cops who blame police brutality on adrenaline. These people have to be held responsible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Other Detainees/ Menstrual Blood Posted by: lawstudent08
Tired self righteous- self pitying "9/11 victims"
Posted by: Sparks on Sep 27, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“He produced handcuffs and said that he was an American, and that he got the handcuffs from one of the wives of the 9/11 victims who had told him to go catch the perpetrators.”


This exactly the sort of total crap a self righteous white American would blubber about. What an A-HOLE. Do tough talking rednecks make people ashamed to be American? It’s right up there with “shock and awe”. If I had sympathy for 9/11 victims this would be the sort of thing that makes me lose my sympathy fast. How did all the 9/11 victims become men anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not really "9/11 victims" like that Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
The lying liars and allied bastards
Posted by: cold2touch on Sep 27, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is an expectedly heartbreaking story in how engagingly human all these poor guys are, yelling "bon appetit" or "good morning, salaam al-aleikum" in unison, though separated by chickenwire and blindfolds.
I wonder whether such display of common decency could be expected among Americans in a similar position, accustomed as we are to alienation, mutual suspicion and envy.

How often do we now hear as one of the motives for staying in Afghanistan and perpetuating daily mass murder of "Taliban" (who is counting? Who cares?) through indicriminate use of depleted uranium is "because of their treatment of women"?
Well, I no longer believe anything they say, this quote is taken from the article: We'd also begun a project to build a school for girls in Kabul, which was a novelty because we were all told that the Taliban wouldn't allow female education.
So this is where Taliban ideology was heading before our brave air force smeared their defenseless country into powder.
Goddam lying liars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Taliban is not Afghan Posted by: Sparks
» RE: Taliban is not Afghan Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Taliban is not Afghan Posted by: Sparks
» RE: Taliban is not Afghan Posted by: harris
Great article!
Posted by: harris on Sep 27, 2006 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The part about the army psychologist suggesting a suicide plan to him is sickening.
I'm glad he had the strength to survive for his family. That this stuff goes on in the name of America makes me sick.

The idiot major who thinks it's a sign of high intelligence to know what a pixel is - unfortunately I think a lot of people are down at that level.
I imagine someone simply scanning a website like this for posts using key words that a "liberal dissident" would write then passing it onto higher ups (who hopefully are better educated and more perceptive and reasonning).

Secret prisons and torture have been going on a lot longer than Bush, it's just hitting the fan now; but I've been reading a lot about the Bush admin. torture/Geneva Convention stuff, and in combination with the domestic removals of rights and the blacked out "news" in the US, it's really making me want to move back to Germany and become an EU citizen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great article! Posted by: Revolutionary
As Guilty as Stalin and Hitler's Camp Guards
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 27, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guantanamo should be seen as the "tipping point" of what will be seen historically as a radical change in American government and culture. We should view everyone of the psychologists, doctors and guards at Guantanamo in the context of how we viewed the guards in Stalin or Hitlers camps. The fact that they are not guilty of the extreme torture and depravity of the gulags is not an excuse. Because they opened the door for what will come, history will judge "what will come" upon them. With the occurence of another terrorist attack on America, we can look forward to more concentration camps, more surveillance, more of the "you are with us or against us" idealogy and the like. Those who think this is an exaggeration and not possible in America need to return to their history books. In the Weimar Republic of Germany, known for its advanced culture of the time, Hitler was popularly elected. Dictators and tyrants have often emerged in history and wrecked havoc upon their peoples and countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I read this book last week and highly recommend it
Posted by: logansafi on Sep 27, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great book. It may be one of the best books ever in regard to exploring the psychology of the various concentraqtion camp guards, police, soldiers, and adminstrators involved in such a place. The author is highly educated, speaks English as well as several other languages, and was culturally knowlegable about the guards he had to deal with, as well as many of the other prisoners he was thrown with.

Anybody else see the comment that Musharraf just said recently to the press about how Pakistan had received millions for turning over these hapless folk to the US. Shoot, and most of the world thought that slavery had been declared illegal by the US years ago! Just goes to show how ignorant we really are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kinda makes one proud.
Posted by: LMNOP on Sep 27, 2006 4:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Oh, say can you see...

"I could never have imagined this was how the United States treated people."

...by the dawn's early light.

"I was afraid of being in Pakistani custody because it's well-known that you get beaten. At first, I was glad that there were Americans there. The great paradox was that the second I was transferred to U.S. custody, that's when the brutality began."

What so proudly we hailed...

"So then I realized that this was obviously the CIA, and that things were going to get worse probably before they got better."

at the twilight's last gleaming?

"cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment"

Whose broad stripes and bright stars ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Weep then write
Posted by: Christie on Sep 27, 2006 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes, when I read information about what is going on today in our name as Americans, such as this dispassionately told yet deeply moving story, I go to the online Site of the lyrics and music of “America the Beautiful”. As the song is played, I read the words of each verse and weep.

I also have written to my Congressmen about the bills concerning torture and about the widespread voter fraud via electronic touch screen voting machines. I don’t believe I need to persuade my two (Democratic) Senators to vote right, but perhaps it encourages them to pursue more passionate redress for these and other vital issues. Remember, statistically each person who writes about an issue is presumed to represent one thousand people. Think, if everyone on this Site wrote their Senators and Representatives about these issues, what an impact it could have. It might stiffen their backbones to take more vigorous action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well duh
Posted by: Gregor on Sep 27, 2006 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look who is in our military now? Rednecks, dumbshits who couldn't pass school. We need a draft to have an across the board stratum of intelligence, not criminals enlisted by the military into the army!

No I do not agree with war, but as long as we have no draft, we will have stupid people in charge committing huge crimes. But if our government can't figure that out and still wants to perpetuate war, then we will have neanderthals running amok in a war that is being viewed by the entire world. We have National Guardsmen on their third tour of duty, burned out, never should have been there, and I am hoping there is not major disaster in this country...Because we have no National Guardsmen to help us.

So lets end the war, and how are we going to do that? We all know. Let's pluck up our courage, mates and get going!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well duh Posted by: yellow
What do you do?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 27, 2006 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you do when you hear that a man is held in a torture chamber and forced to listen to a tape recording of a woman being tortured and raped, while he is told that the woman is his wife?

Yup, that really happened and our tax dollars paid for it.

What do you do when you hear about teenage boys being raped in front of an audience of captive Iraqis by US soldiers who are operating under the guidance of Donald Rumsfeld, Stephen Cambone and William Boykin?

Yes, that did indeed happen, according to Seymour Hersch.

What do you do when you learn that all this is being done by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice for one reason - in order to maintain the ridiculous oil profits for themselves and their Saudi friends?

What to do when you learn that similar tactics are used daily in Israeli prisons, where Palestinians are held without any rights whatsover? I don't think the Israelis know what 'habeus corpus' means - and our tax dollars go to support this?

Here is one suggestion: you stop paying taxes. You stop putting you hard-earned dollars into the federal booty bag. You stop 'going along to get along'. You quit paying off your debts to the financial structures which promote the global oil empire. You walk right into the fabled 'halls of power' and tell them to go to hell. You tell them that you are not for sale, that you won't allow these things to be done in your name, and that you are going to dedicate every waking moment to ensuring that the people responsible spend a long time locked up in little cells, as per the much-admired 'rule of law' as expressed in the US Consitution. And don't yell, say it quietly and gently with a smile on your face- that'll really terrrify the bastards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do you do? Posted by: shanaza
» RE: What do you do? Posted by: Aussie Kim
The fix is in
Posted by: Democritus on Sep 27, 2006 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How brave and stalwart the three Republican senators seemed to be--McCain, Warner, and Graham--standing up to Bush and demanding that the Geneva Conventions be left unchanged. But then they caved in. What Bush wanted, and what he apparently got, was an agreement that will let the CIA continue their heavy-handed treatment of detainees--regardless of their innocence or guilt. He also got what the CIA wanted, which was immunity for committing past torture. This story of the detainment and the brutal physical and psychological treatment of a British subject is a harrowing tale. Bush and his minions should themselves be in the dock. They are guilty of war crimes, and they should be punished for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pixelated - 1936 - Mr. Deeds
Posted by: dancerkc on Sep 28, 2006 4:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was growing up the word "pixelated" meant sloshed or otherwise a bit wacky. If you remember the 1936 movie "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" with Gary Cooper and Jean Arthur, Cooper's character, Longfellow Deeds is hit with the accusation of being "pixelated."

Mr. Deeds (Gary Cooper) is in court because his relatives want to get the fortune he inherited. He wants to donate it to charitable causes and the relatives want to stop him before he is able to donate it the money.

The court scene is comic when two spinsters (do we still use that term?) from his home town out west are called to the stand to testify that he is pixelated. Turns out they also think the prosecuting attorney is "pixelated" and a lot of others as well. The court breaks up and the case against Deeds (good, allegorical name) dies in laughter.

Back to Cuba. It seems hard to imagine that Major Idiot would never have heard of the word "pixelated" at all, in any context. That word has been around long before today's computers or digital images. He certainly earns the name Major Idiot. Funny name. Scary in real life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking as a proud non-American...
Posted by: andyc on Sep 28, 2006 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your country is a disgrace while you allow this sort of thing to happen. Stop it NOW, and prosecute every one of the b*stards who has been involved in it.

Until then, you have no right to expect any forgiveness from your victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pixelation?
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 1, 2006 11:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to pixelate Bush, his cronies and anyone dumb enough to follow his orders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement