Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bush Is Trashing Our National Parks

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted September 26, 2006.


After promising to save them, Bush has abandoned our most beautiful public spaces.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Jim Hightower

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It seems to me that George W. missed his true calling. I think he has long harbored a secret desire to be a thespian, for he's a man who clearly loves to dress up in costumes.

There's his famous Top Gun outfit, for example, which he strapped on back in 2003, strutting around vampishly to declare "mission accomplished" in Iraq. Also, every few weeks, George likes to reprise his abolish this magnificent system, and failing our children and all future generations who should receive America's public-park heritage in even better shape than it came to us. They diminish our country by shortchanging the rich culture, history, science, and natural life that spring from these unique places. For a nation of incredible wealth, this political failure is a damning stain on our professed ideals of the common goodand of good stewardship.

The politicos don't seem to get it that parks are beloved, even by people who don't like much of anything else that government does. In a Harris Poll last December, people ranked the Park Service as the most popular government program of all. With 85% support (including 83% of Republicans!), parks even outpaced such programs as crime fighting, Medicare and Social Security.

There are 388 of these public spaces, and they are widely used, especially by middle-class and lower-income families who count on them for recreation, vacation, education, and more. An astonishing 280 million visitors a year find their way to these forests, scenic rivers, historic sites, mountains, seashores, canyons, volcanos, monuments, islands, artifacts, glaciers, and other wonders -- more people than attend all football, baseball, and other professional sports events combined. For these millions, the park system is a tangible and highly valued benefit, firsthand evidence of what government is doing for ordinary folks.

The problem for park whackers is that this is one place where their whacks show. The years of budget shortfalls have taken an obvious toll on a park system that the general public considers its own. Visitors arrive to find such unpleasant surprises as reduced hours, discontinued tours andtalks, closed trails, unrepaired storm damage, boarded-up historic structures, leaky lodges, shuttered visitor centers, curtailed education programs, crumbling boardwalks, neglected campgrounds, dilapidated bridges, eroded roads -- and, of course, ever-rising fees. Here is a sampling of the deterioration, as documented in reports by such watchdog groups as The Coalition of National Park Service Retirees (motto: "Green Blood Still Runs Deep"), National Parks Conservation Association, and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER):

  • When Bush held his 2000 photo op to castigate Clinton for the system's maintenance backlog, he singled out a leaky roof at Gettysburg National Military Park. Six years later, that roof still leaked.

  • The visitor center at the U.S.S. Arizona Memorial in Hawaii is sinking.

  • Bridges in Mount Rainier National Park are in such disrepair that they are unsafe, so hikers cannot get to the park's backcountry cabins.

  • Traffic jams are notorious in many parks because there has been inadequate expansion of roads and parking lots to keep up with the increase in visitors. For example, an 11 mile ride on the single-lane road to the peaks of Great Smoky Mountains National Park takes up to four hours in the summer and fall leaf season, and an average of 6,000 cars a day try to enter the main visitors' area of the Grand Canyon, which has only 2,400 parking spaces.

  • Staff cuts at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore mean that a fourth of the school kids who want to participate in the park's education program must be turned away.

  • The 3.4 million acre Death Valley National Park has 15 rangers to watch visitors where temperatures can exceed 120 degrees -- it says it needs 45. Of course, there's no unpleasant reality that the Bushites won't try to deny or paper over. During the 2004 election battle, for example, each of the park superintendents received an internal memo dictated by Bush political appointees. It instructed these civil servants to teach their park rangers and other staffers to use politically correct language for the '04 season. Employees were forbidden to use the term "budget cuts" to explain to visitors why the parks were in such bad shape -- instead, they were to refer gaily to "service level adjustments." In addition, they were told to assure all visitors,"This administration is very committed to preserving the resources of the national parks."


This year, the superintendents got yet another memo from on high. Labeled "talking points," it told NPS professionals to answer questions about Bush's proposed 30% budget cut with this soothing line: "The National Park Service,like most agencies, is tightening its belt as our nation rebuilds from Katrina, continues the war on terrorism,and strives to reduce the deficit." This from the White House gang that totally botched the response to Katrina, that has America mired in a $300 billion war of lies, and that is the worst deficit bloater in history!

The Bush agenda

In fairness, it should be noted that the Bushites have added to the park system as well as subtracted. While visitors find poorer conditions and reduced services, they are just as amazed to find that Bush & Company has brought its own particular agenda into our public parks, adding three new dimensions that Teddy Roosevelt probably never thought of: commercialization, privatization, and Christianization.

COMMERCIALIZATION. For the laissez-faire extremists around Bush (and for many of his corporate backers), having millions of acres of natural splendor and quietude in the public domain is not a blessing, but an unmitigated waste -- a missed opportunity for commercial exploitation. So, Bush has filled key government positions with ideologues and corporate servants.

Their major effort was an attempt literally to rewrite the historic mission of NPS. They proposed to weaken the original purpose -- the preservation of America's natural wonders for future generations -- by coupling it with a new purpose of equal weight -- providing access to interests that want to use the parks for their own gain. The good news is that park employee groups and conservation activists, along with allies in Congress, have just recently defeated this grand plan. The bad news is that many elements of their plan have already been implemented.

One backward step has been the acceptance of corporate advertising in these public areas. This is being rationalized as a necessary step to "help" the parks by getting corporate ad money to cover some of their budget shortfalls. You can see the cynical game they're playing--intentionally slash public funding (Bush proposes a cut of $100 million from the NPS's 2007 annual budget), then call in corporations to be white-hat rescuers.

Their initial ads-in-the-park plan would've sold naming rights to rooms and other park facilities, let corporate donors put their logos on park vehicles, and generally would've Disneyfied the places. However, another howl of public protest forced the NPS brass to back off, so the latest "donations and fundraising" policy leaves the Park Service merely a little bit pregnant. Donor plaques in the park, web and video links, ad tie-ins, and such will be available to what they call "Proud Partner" arrangements, which already include Coca Cola and Ford.

Lest you think they'll stop there, look at NPS's sister agency, the Forest Service. This keeper of America's magnificent national forests acted in March to liberalize "sponsor recognition rules." For the first time, corporations can sponsor special events on forest lands, allowing them to plaster their ads on trails and roads, inside lodges, on ski gondolas, and elsewhere. Moreover, the FS's new rule pre-empts state restrictions governing ads for tobacco, alcohol, and gambling.

Jeff Ruch of PEER says, "Under this plan, every tacky commercial promotion will be welcomed. Vistas of our national forests may soon include giant inflatable beer bottles, banners for chewing tobacco, and snack food kiosks."

While the Park Service has not yet succumbed to full-tilt, eyesore ad fever, it has quietly saturated even the nation's most isolated and serene parks with something quite noisy: cell phones. They have blanketed some of our country's oldest and wildest parks, including Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Yosemite, Everglades, Mojave, Big Cypress, Mammoth Cave, and many more. This is, as one observer said in dismay, "the death of solitude." The ring of the cell phone intrudes even in remote backcountry, and the new call of the wild is a human voice shouting, "Can you hear me now?"

Thanks to Bush and Congress, Mother Nature must also compete with the ubiquitous, metallic towers of telecom giants. Take the cell phone tower at Old Faithful… please! Yes, nothing is sacred to these commercializers. A stark, 80-foot tower, topped with three antennas, now looms over this famous geyser (an American icon in Yellowstone National Park). In all, five towers have invaded Yellowstone, with more in the works. There are so many towers in the national system that NPS doesn't know the total number or where they are. That's because the policy -- written behind closed doors by park officials and such corporations as Verizon, Sprint, Alltel, and Quest -- essentially allows the corporations to work out deals with individual parks on the number of towers, their location, and size.

All of this has been done without the required public notice and with no national debate. It's the telecom takeover not only of our parks, but of our democratic process.

PRIVATIZATION. Let's hear fromDick Cheney, speaking in April 2001: "We believe in the [NPS] and its values -- values which are, of course, all gathered together in the person of the park ranger."

Who doesn't love park rangers, probably the most admired of all federal employees? Well, Bush and Cheney, to name two nonfans of these public employees. Sweet rhetoric aside, the Bushites have been working steadily behind the scenes to replace real rangers with low-wage rent-a-rangers employed by private subcontractors.

A White House privatization plan in 2003 called for transferring more than half of NPS's jobs (rangers, firefighters, archeologists, curators, biologists, and others) to low-bid contractors (I think I smell Halliburton here!). Congress temporarily stalled this, but Bush continues to push, requiring the parks to study and test his privatization scheme. In an agency that already is cash strapped andunderstaffed, NPS must hire a bevy of consultants, frittering away millions of dollars that it needs for real work.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration is compelling the Forest Service to consider privatizing more than two-thirds of its employees. Its fire-fighting jobs are being reviewed for outplacement, along with half of its law-enforcement officers and rangers, all of its geologists, and 3,000 foresters and conservationists. In 2003, the service spent some $100 million on privatization studies, but found no identifiable savings.

On the other side of the ledger, not only are both of these park agencies wasting scarce funds on useless studies, but you can also imagine how much good this is doing for employee morale. Working with either the NPS or FS has long been considered more than a job -- it's a calling. The low bidder is never going to bring this invaluable intangible to the task.

CHRISTIANIZATION. People think of many of America's parks as awesome "cathedrals" of solitude. But the Bushites are saying, hey, let's bring some real "church" to Momma Nature -- in particular, let's toss a sop to our extremist Christian constituency by converting to a system of faith-based park management (non-Christians need not apply).

Thus, while taking in the grandeur of the Grand Canyon from the popular viewing area on the south rim, your eyes can also behold three bronze plaques bearing Bible verses, put there by the Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary. When the park superintendent had them removed on constitutional grounds, a top Bush appointee at NPS headquarters overruled him, and the plaques are still there.

In 2003, this same park began selling Grand Canyon: A Different View. It is a Christian creationist tome asserting that the canyon is not the product of geological forces but instead was created by Noah's flood and is only 6,000 years old. Again, the park superintendent balked, and again he was overruled by Bush political appointees, who ordered hundreds more copies of the book to sell. An NPS spokeswoman said flatly, "We don't want to remove it" -- and they haven't.

The Bush regime also gave rapid response to a right-wing Christian demand that history be rewritten at the Lincoln Memorial. An eightminute video shown there portrays many of the historic marches and events that have taken place at the memorial. Christian "purists," however, screeched that the video's showing of antiwar, pro-choice, and gay-rights demonstrations must be excised, claiming that the inclusion of such footage implied that Lincoln himself embraced these causes.

Bush appointees promptly spent more than $200,000 to edit the video so it includes footage of such other events as pro-Gulf War demonstrations and the Christian "Promise Keepers" rally -- even though these did not take place at the Lincoln Memorial. The Christianized version still has not made its public debut, however, thanks to the vigilance of several groups that have exposed and opposed this political cleansing of history.

The Commons

Our parks are us. The American ideal -- and the source of our strength as a people, a society, and a nation -- centers on the unifying belief that we truly are "all in this together." This essential democratic notion has taken a severe pounding from the Powers That Be during the past decade or so. For example, on the sharing of America's fabulous economic gains, on the sharing of the horrific price for Bush's war in Iraq, on the sharing of the universal need for good health coverage -- we clearly are no longer in it together.

A place to start putting The Commons back together -- both symbolically and tangibly -- could be in our parks. These gems of shared ground link us spiritually and physically with each other, with our past and future, and with our natural world. By letting them be tarnished, our leaders have tarnished America itself. It's up to us, using our grassroots strength, to make these gems gleam again.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

From The Hightower Lowdown, edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, September 2006. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of "Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time to Take It Back."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
insanity
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 26, 2006 2:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to Hightower for giving us the lowdown on Bushie insanity with respect to the park system. They are besmirching the parks with greed and narrow religious dogma. It is part of their campaign to turn Americans into a bunch of narrowminded puppets. I will not visit any of the parks until all the junk objects and all the junk propaganda has been removed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: insanity Posted by: tedbohne
The parks r us
Posted by: edith on Sep 26, 2006 2:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as Hightower well puts it. Bush has aggravated a preexisting situation of commericialization of national parks and underfunding by both Democrat and Republican Congresses of maintenance and park ranger resources for our wilderness and national forest areas. Stupid environmental decisions by the Feds and the states over many years well preceding Bush also cause our parks in the West to become firetraps and repostories of burnt out acreage.

The corruption of the West by greed is an old story. Perhaps Democrats and Republicans would like to transfer all funds for missile defense to parks maintenance, which would allow a waiver of entrance fees as well. Perhaps Al Gore and John McCain will cut off miltiary aid to Israel and pull US forces out of the Middle East, Korea and the Mediterranean. Perhaps pigs will fly.

The parks do reflect the public's love of bringing plastic convenience to the most pristine areas. Cell phones are a curse that transcend politics.

We do have the politicians we deserve. Who said we weren't a democracy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hacks Gone Wild
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 26, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If someone would have written a book or play detailing a hypothetical president that did half of the ignorant, short-sighted sh*t that BushCo has done I would have said it was over the top. I guess farce can be reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bus stops at every tree?
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Sep 26, 2006 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The parks are a national treasure and so much more should be done to preserve them.. I’m not sure all this hinges on increased funding at times.

First, tapping corporations for support is logical and should be expected.. After all, they probably do as much damage indirectly to our lands and environment as anyone else. I don’t agree at all with plastering their name all over everything defacing the landscape but logo’s on park material, maps etc could be just as effective and probably wouldn’t irritate visitors as much as seeing a sign in the middle of a park desolate road!

Alternet published an article recently that addressed private individuals buying lands for preservation with corporate help so this is viable and the money is out there.

Outsourcing also isn’t a political thing, it’s a financial consideration. Rangers aren’t being eliminated witb “fake rangers” but are being hired by an outsider. The cost benefits of outsourcing can be many if the program is run correctly. The flip side to this is they make so little, taking away gov't benefits etc might just reduce the number of people willing/able to do that job

I don’t agree with increasing access roads in all cases.. I take the other view, more roads, more people, more damage to the lands. If you want to get to remote areas, hike there! This is supposed to be a natural area. Nothing is worse thinking your out in the wilderness and seeing a bus drive by on the road! Talking about ruining the parks.

Another missed point - How many people volunteer to help at parks - visit their web site http://www.nps.gov/volunteer/ , they are always looking for help. Anyone can get into that program. This can make a big difference. I do trail clean up when ever I’m out hiking, and come back with a bag full of junk.. easy to do and if everyone did it, what a difference!
Which brings up the next problem that doesn’t depend on money – YOU – if more people had any consideration at all for the environment, the maintenance of the parks wouldn’t be nearly as intense.

Cell phones.. well, annoying as it is, driving while on the cell phone bothers me more!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jbcm2
Posted by: jbcm2 on Sep 26, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They hang the man and flog the woman
Who steals the goose from off the Commons
But turn the greater villans loose
Who steal the Commons from the goose

Old English verse

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EL DIABLOCO IS POISON forced on people.
Posted by: Burtonger on Sep 26, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personaly am totally amazed at the complacency and ignorance of the american people,totally.
BUSHCO have proven non-stop how imensely destructive all their policies, foreign and domestic have been for americans and still anyone would listen to or obey his ridiculous orders.
American military should refuse to follow ILLEGAL orders and arrest all the isanely greedy and corrupt BUSHCO and all cohorts ,prosecute and then punish,either jail or execute these super criminals and seize their stolen assets to pay for the destruction and murder.
AMERICA IS A PARIAH more than ever because of EL DIABLOCO.
KARMA is coming, a universal law,not made by liars/lawyers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Views of an NPS Volunteer
Posted by: badger on Sep 26, 2006 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a regular NPS volunteer for years, working for a historic artifacts department. I agree the morale is pretty low among my (paid) coworkers. They have seen their profession reduced to merely stabilizing the condition of artifacts the public sees in the museums, instead of making needed repairs / restoration. And now contracting their work out! Can you envision Joe Sixpack working on Union Army rifles fired at Gettysburg? Or any of our National treasures disappearing on the black market?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just DO SOMETHING!!!
Posted by: spacemarine83 on Sep 26, 2006 10:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, here is the deal. I am a conservative. No I dont believe in abortion, and certainly not gay marriage, but I also dont believe in our "president" either, nor his policies. If you dont like the way things are going, you have two choices:

1. Go to another country and piss and moan about all this shit and be looked upon as imptent a-hole.

OR

2. Stand UP and FIGHT!!!! You have a voice, use it!! You have a vote, use it!!! You can even protest!!!!

Please, just do something rather than sit at home on your comptuer and type away about the evils of the world and bemoan the system with others on Alternet. Just do it!!

P.S. Do it for your fellow Americans, especially the soldiers...they dont want to do what they are doing, but their hands are tied...they took an oath to the constitution and for America. Help them too!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OK, Calm down. Posted by: edith
If you're not going to do anything..............
Posted by: tedbohne on Sep 27, 2006 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AWW FOR CHRISSAKE! Why don't all of you shut the fuck up. Quit your whining and just shut up. You've collectively allowed this sick bastard and his fellow inmates to stay in the halls of power. Bush did this!, Bush did that! Sounds like a bunch of high school sophomores. These mutts should have been run off years ago. In fact, if this country weren't so full of marshmallows he'd be dead along with the rest of these degenerates. If you're not going to gather together ENMASSE and take up arms against these thugs which it is your RIGHT to do, then please just shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ted's Excellent Adventure Posted by: edith
US Owns US
Posted by: hole11 on Dec 2, 2006 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
United States owns us. We are the parks. Yep, I believe that. I believe we need to release control of "national" parks held in mainly western states. Didn't we fight a war on this? Oh yeah, the US won.

The biggest owner of land is the federal government (US). I like parks don't get me wrong. Trees, fresh water, and sometimes the lack of people is always worth preserving for the future. But should the park be national when we live in a state? It kind of disturbs me that if a crime occurs (and I am sure they do) on or in a national park it's a federal crime.

Maybe just for that reason I want to see less national parks and more parks turned over to the state they are in. Our system is supposed to be local representitives taking care of local people not Washington DC dictating some consenses on the locals thousands of miles away.

But hey, if you want big brother telling you what is going to happen to a park near you then that is your business. I would like to think that the government shouldn't own land but protect it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement