Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Racism Charges at DC Moonie Paper

By Max Blumenthal, The Nation. Posted September 21, 2006.


There's a desperate fight for control at the top of the Washington Times, and accusations from the staff are flying that the newsroom is run by racist good ole' boys.
Advertisement

These are edgy times at the Washington Times.

Still one of the most important right-wing organs in the nation, the paper has a circulation base of around 100,000. According to a source close to senior management, in the past two decades it has burned through far more than the $1.7 billion previously reported. During that time its editorial stance has consistently leaned to the hard right, as its favorite targets have ranged from liberal comsymps to President Bill Clinton to, most recently, "illegal aliens" and their allies in the "open borders lobby." Throughout, the Times has served as a major key on the conservative movement's Mighty Wurlitzer.

A nasty succession battle is now heating up at the paper, punctuated by allegations of racism, sexism and unprofessional conduct, that has implications far beyond its fractious newsroom. According to several reliable inside sources, Preston Moon, the youngest son of Korean Unification Church leader and Times financier Sun Myung Moon, has initiated a search committee to find a replacement for editor in chief Wesley Pruden--a replacement who is not Pruden's handpicked successor, managing editor Francis Coombs.

Preston Moon wants to wrest control of the paper from Pruden and Coombs, according to a Times senior staffer, in order to shift the paper away from their brand of conservatism, which is characterized by extreme racial animus and connections to nativist and neo-Confederate organizations. A Harvard MBA, Preston Moon is said to be seeking to install an editorial regime with more widely palatable politics. His search committee is reportedly headed by Times editor at large Arnaud De Borchgrave, the former editor in chief of UPI who edited the Times from 1985 to 1991. Once an ardent anticommunist who oversaw a Times fund for the Nicaraguan contras, De Borchgrave has been critical of the Bush Administration's unilateralist approach to foreign policy. According to a senior staffer and a source close to Times senior management, De Borchgrave favors UPI's editor emeritus Martin Walker as Pruden's successor. Walker is a former correspondent for the liberal British newspaper the Guardian and has been a vocal supporter of British Prime Minister Tony Blair's early New Labour politics. (De Borchgrave declined to respond to questions about his alleged role in the Times succession battle.)

Also rumored to be on the short list: Former UPI executive editor and National Review editor at large John O'Sullivan, a former adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. A Times senior staffer says O'Sullivan met with his former boss in Washington in mid-September, where she pledged to throw her weight behind his candidacy.

Both Coombs and Pruden, meanwhile, are facing a litany of complaints from former and current colleagues of racism and sexual harassment. More than a dozen well-placed sources spoke to The Nation. Many wished to remain anonymous, for fear of jeopardizing their jobs. Others spoke on the record. But the sources are consistent about the atmosphere Pruden and Coombs have fostered inside the paper, which they describe as profoundly demeaning and abusive to women and minorities. Preston Moon has hired the powerhouse Washington law firm Nixon Peabody to interview Times staffers about the allegations of racism and sexism.

Approaching his 70th birthday, Pruden is described by several sources as an "absentee landlord" who has tacitly handed control over to Coombs. Now Coombs is driving the paper to the far shores of the right. Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Project executive director Mark Potok credits the Times with helping to fuel the nativism that has taken hold this year in Republican political campaigns. "The Times is a terrible little newspaper that unfortunately has vastly disproportionate influence on the right wing of the Republican Party," Potok said. "The vast majority of people who read it don't realize that this paper is in bed with bigots and white supremacists. The Times is a key part of the radical right's apparatus in the United States."

Pruden and Coombs have stonewalled Preston Moon's investigation and threatened to hold a public news conference, during which they would denounce "the crazy Moonies" and claim that Preston Moon and his father are pressuring them to inject pro-Unification Church propaganda into the paper's coverage, according to a senior newsroom staffer. Times president Douglas D.M. Joo is backing Coombs and Pruden to the bitter end. Joo is a business rival of Preston Moon who, the senior staffer says, would be stripped of his post at the Times and redeployed to Korea if Pruden and Coombs go down. "This is a cancer that goes all the way to the top," the senior staffer said of the paper's tolerance of bigotry. "And if you don't root out the cancer, it will kill you. If this ever got out to the mainstream press, we would be finished as a paper."


Digg!

Max Blumenthal is a Puffin Foundation writing fellow at the Nation Institute. Read his blog at maxblumenthal.blogspot.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But we need double standards
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Sep 21, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our president must be able to point halfway round the planet, cry evil, and cause bombs to fall.

But if another president points at him and cries evil, Bolton has to be able to keep a straight face as he afixes the label 'comic strip'.

How else can we see the distinction, if not for properly presented news which makes it plain enough for all to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rag
Posted by: YogiBear on Sep 21, 2006 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Washington Times doesn't even try to make their news seem two-sided. Most people on the right have even given up citing it as a source, becuase they know it won't be taken seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Honesty about mass-immigration is NOT a "progressive" virtue.
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Sep 21, 2006 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Progressive" media sources (such as AlterNet) excel at some things and are worse than worthless at others. Examples:

-----The "alternative" media excel at exposing corporate corruption.

-----They are worse than worthless when discussing immigration honestly.

There are catastrophic ecological implications to population growth. The overwhelming majority of US population growth is now a result of immigrants (and their numerous offspring). In California, the figure is 98-100%.

BILLIONS of people want to move here, and that's not hyperbole! If we let them, the only thing that will stop them will be the simple (and obvious, to anyone who dares to think it through) fact that "here" will be even worse than where ever they're coming from.

As a conservationist (who refrained from having children for ecological reasons), I won't stand by silently and watch everything I've worked for be destroyed.

When's the last time you saw "progressives" have an honest discussion of the ecological implications of mass immigration? The Washington Times is no conservationist publication, but it does expose some less-than-flattering realities of defacto open-borders.

I've debated Mexicans (right here in AlterNet's comments) who at first deny their agenda is to "take over" the US for their fantasized "Aztlan," only to gloat over it when I call their bluff. Their stated weapon of choice is simply to outbreed the "gringos." When my assertion is ridiculed, I provide the proof. Most (not all!)Mexicans have this attitude.

"Progressives" (unlike the Washington Times) are unfortunately too timid to confront this ecologically catastrophic hypocrisy. We don't have to buy into all the Times' politics to appreciate that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My, my we meet again Posted by: AdamG
» The human fence Posted by: AdamG
» Nice, intelligent, articulate reply. Posted by: conquerormarr
» People get born ... SOMEWHERE ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
The Nation's Blumenthal's been triple outscooped, six months ago
Posted by: Meremark on Sep 21, 2006 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
READ it here, the players and interlocked bodies of Washington Times, Moon, South African aparteid, Abramoff, neo-Nazis, KKK, and 'g. o. b. racist confederacy neo-cons' are a wholecloth, which is the fabric of fascistic GOP despotism -- G.Bush, Sinister and G.Bush, Jughead -- infected when G.Bush, Sr. stole into his Evil Office hiding behind Reagan's head-don't hair-do.

For names, dates, and crimes against America, daily, LOOK HERE:

WayneMadsenReport dot COM

The Nation and Blumenthal are pathetic in reporting and publishing the corrupt political operatives working the Wash.Times and neo-nazi Confederacy sedition into American mass media minds.

Wayne Madsen six months ago had ALL this story and much more, documented, (read the site archives), which The Nation helped starve by slight, snub and intentional neglect.

READ Wayne Madsen, YOU F**K HEADS, because you are only playing reporters on the internet.

REAL quality as this sample, (as far as comment limits here go):

http://waynemadsenreport.com/2006_07040716.php

July 7/8, 2006 -- SPECIAL REPORT. Those who claim the Bush administration is a Nazi regime are not far from the truth. This story is a special investigation of Bush family slush funds, smuggling, and secret money conduits from and to various right-wing causes, including some that are extremely violent. The NY Times is running a story today about the U.S. military recruiting Aryan Nation, neo-Nazi, and other white supremacists into its ranks. The Times' report states that Neo-Nazi graffiti has sprung up in Baghdad, in quoting from a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The involvement of white supremacy and neo-Nazi groups with the Pentagon began in earnest during the administrations of Reagan and Bush I. According to informed sources who have tracked the neo-Nazis since the Reagan era, the surge in extreme right-wing elements in the Federal government was spurred on by the network of Nicaraguan Contra support activities created to facilitate going around the prohibitions enacted by the Congress. A key member of that strategy was Cheney's Chief of Staff David Addington, who was with the CIA, the Iran-Contra Committee in Congress, and then signed on as senior Vice President for the American Trucking Associations (ATA). WMR reported yesterday on the involvement of a foundation set up by McLean Trucking Co., a member of the ATA, with covert Contra support.

The ATA is a hotbed of GOP activity as well past connections with support for covert CIA activities. Its chief lobbyist is Jim Whittinghill, a former aide to Sen. Bob Dole. Whittinghill's wife, Nancy Dorn, ... served as Special Assistant for Legislative Affairs to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. ... Dorn worked for Defense Secretary Dick Cheney as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Inter-American Affairs. While working for Cheney, Dorn became a close associate of Addington. Dorn was also Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs. In 2001, Dorn returned to government after acting as a lobbyist for Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and China. She became special assistant for legislative affairs to Vice President Cheney. In 2002, Dorn became the Deputy Director for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), where she served until 2003 before becoming Vice President for Government Relations of General Electric, the parent company of NBC and NBC News. (This puts into context the partisan pro-Bush editorial slants of the network's news division, particularly Nora O'Donnell, Campbell Brown, Brian Williams, Tim Russert, and Chris Matthews).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlterNet used to frustrate me.
Posted by: kryptx on Sep 21, 2006 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now it just makes me laugh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's good actually Posted by: fifthworld
surprise: the Washington Times has weird people working for it.
Posted by: edith on Sep 22, 2006 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop the presses. Is there supposed to be shock value in this story. What's next week? The Nation hires antiwar activists!!!!!!

The real story of the Wash Times and the Moons is where and how do the Moon people make billions of dollars and how and why have they influenced politicians in this nation with those billions? And the answer is not the "food import" business in South Korea. After all Vito Corleone was in the olive oil business, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yep Posted by: fifthworld
I thought
Posted by: fifthworld on Sep 23, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the COUNTRY was run by a bunch of racist good-ol boys.

Bha-dum-BUM.

Bada-bing, bada-boom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]