Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obrador Supporters Continue Long Protest

By Rebecca Ruiz, AlterNet. Posted September 20, 2006.


As fallout from the disputed Mexican election continues, Obrador's supporters are still rallying for change.
41850story
41850_story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Rebecca Ruiz

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

MEXICO CITY -- Standing among 150,000 people shouting ¡Viva Mexico! Geronimo Rodriguez Hernández, a 50-year-old brick maker, waved a large flag emblazoned with Mexico's national colors and the phrase Convención Nacional Democrática, or the National Democratic Convention. Even afternoon thunderstorms didn't deter Hernández from attending the Sept. 16 rally organized by the former presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Gathered in the Zócalo, Mexico City's historic town square, the crowd cheered and chanted for the city's former mayor who was defeated in the July 2 election by 234,000 votes. While many said they felt emboldened by the nearly two-month-long protest, which halted traffic in the surrounding blocks, others blamed the encampment for driving away business and tourism, resulting in lost wages, particularly for waiters, taxi drivers and hotel staff. Until early September, when Obrador lost a battle with the nation's highest electoral court over the results, his supporters had been camping out in the square for seven weeks.

Obrador insists that the election was rife with fraud. Some have accused him of failing to challenge election regularities that benefited candidates from his party, the Democratic Revolution Party, or PRD. Despite criticism of Obrador's unwillingness to cede the election and his declining popularity in some polls, the rally was billed as an opportunity to join him in civil resistance for a chance to carve out an alternative political agenda to that of his opponent, Felipe Calderón.

In 2000, Hernández cast his vote for the current president, Vicente Fox, believing that the moment was ripe with the promise of change. For the first time in 71 years, the government would be led by a different party, the National Action Party, or PAN, instead of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, a party whose rule had frequently been characterized by electoral fraud and corruption.

As Hernández remembers it, there were pledges to alleviate poverty that were abandoned as Fox's once liberal campaign turned into a conservative force that sought to privatize industry and cut social programs. "I voted for him," Hernández said, referring to Fox, "with the hope that Mexico was going to improve, but now they say there is no poverty."

According to the World Bank, 50 percent of Mexico's 107 million residents live in poverty. Though the country experienced a notable upturn in its economic growth rate, the official rate of unemployment also doubled in recent years.

In May, Hernández, who makes 600 pesos per week, or roughly 55 U.S. dollars, voted for Obrador because of his platform to eradicate poverty through government assistance. He refuses to recognize Felipe Calderón as president. "We have to change the politics in Mexico," he said.

Dressed in a business suit, Ricardo Colomer Aguilar walked through the crowd holding a small portrait of Obrador against his chest. The 45-year-old restaurant manager also said that he would not support Calderon as the new president, citing his belief that three million votes had been mysteriously lost. "They are imposing Calderón on us," he said.

Aguilar, a father of three, hoped that Obrador would help create new jobs so that his children would not have to move to the United States for employment. Still, he was unsure of how the movement would proceed. "They never allowed the people to express themselves in this manner," Aguilar said.

Nearby, Candi Basilio, 17, and Mariel Muñoz, 20, purchased hot pink T-shirts for about three U.S. dollars featuring a large Mexican flag and a headshot of Obrador. Below the photo was the word "Presidente."

"We're fanatics of Obrador," Basilio said. "He's going to help the students."

María Luisa Piña, 57, who attended the rally with her 78-year-old mother, María Dolores Orozco, was waiting to hear the proposals. Neither of them had ever been politically active until Obrador began protesting the election results. They waited to hear the proposals. "In some manner, they have to help us," Piña said, hoping the platform would include aid for the elderly.

Eventually a sea of raised hands voted to form a parallel government by swearing in Obrador as president on Nov. 20. He plans to rewrite the Constitution in order to guarantee the people health care, food and work. The crowd also renounced Calderón and his cabinet's authority and condoned future acts of civil resistance.

Hernández, the brick maker, said it was too early to tell if the continued protest and refusal to recognize Calderón might result in military or political upheaval. He planned to stay involved regardless of calls to end the conflict. "We believe in Obrador and in the new system of government that he wants to create," he said. "That is our dream."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Rebecca Ruiz is a freelance writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
non of the governments
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 20, 2006 2:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that ballot counting in all three north american governments is controlled by neofascists it is hard to see how we can bring democracy back to us but I am glad to see that Mexico at least has a lot of people willing to sacrifice themselves to the cause of bringing about real democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not the Supreme Court
Posted by: jules_siegel on Sep 20, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until early September, when Obrador lost a battle with the Supreme Court for a recount

The case was heard in the Electoral Court, not the Supreme Court. López Obrador never asked for a full recount, but for setting the election aside.

"Voto por voto, casilla por casilla" was never more than a slogan to rally his troops.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not the Supreme Court Posted by: mexdem
Obrador's problems are of his own making
Posted by: Jesse on Sep 20, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obrador should have won the election--but he didn't largely because of his own poor politicking and decision making.

Chummying up to Chavez was a bad political move. Simple as that. Obrador had a 60-point lead in the polls-- and he pissed it away. That was just plain stupid. It would be like Hilary Clinton going running a closely-contested election this November. I wanted the guy to win, but when you shoot yourself in the foot repeatedly it's nobody's fault but your own.

Just because the "wrong" guy wins is no evidence of fraud. Before I get flamed for supporting Calderon, I am not saying that there is not and never has been fraud in a Mexican election--just that the sample size we have doesn't point that way. And every day that Obrador mounts protests like this he loses votes. If the election were held again today he would lose by an even bigger margin, I bet--because his support in Mexico City would be much attenuated.

You know, the PRD controls a third of the votes in Congress. He could, if he really wanted to be effective, call for an alliance with the PRI and make it just about impossible for the PAN to get its programs through. But no, he wants the election set aside. Bad move--he hurts himself.

Before people start crowing about the US and control of the vote here, I should say the situation is not parallel to Gore or Kerry. Neither of those two were in the party that controlled Congress. Had they been, the situation would be different now, no?

The PRD holds the balance of power in the part of the government that passes and implements the law-- and IMO they are blowing the chance to go after local elections and build on the solid support they have there. It's maddening to watch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep on keepin' on, AMLO
Posted by: veive on Sep 20, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the example of our southern neighbor will teach us how to make sure our future elections aren't phoney. Obrador says he wants to be Mexico's version of FDR. If he succeeds, the tsunami of illegal immigrants into this country will surely subside. Who knows, after two more years of Bush, Mexico may look a helluva lot better than el norte and many of us will be heading south.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some clarification
Posted by: kellyg on Sep 20, 2006 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AlterNet readers might appreciate some clarification of facts on the subject. For starters, the surname of the candidate in question is López Obrador, never just "Obrador" except in chants and occasional gestures of affection.

Similarly, using the maternal surname "Hernández" as a second reference for a person named "Geronimo Rodriguez Hernández" unfortunately leaves the impression that the author is unfamiliar with her subject matter.

And why do the AlterNet editors go to the trouble to include the accent mark in Hernández but not in Gerónimo or Rodríguez?

The figure of 150,000, wherever it came from, is way too low an estimate of the turnout in the Zócalo on September 16.

The Mexican economy did not experience a "significant upturn" with the Fox administration. Its GDP growth sunk to 0 or 1 percent for the first three years, before finally getting somewhere, but not far. Average annual GDP growth for the six-year Fox administration will be abysmal.

López Obrador never "chumm[ied] up to Chávez." He was falsely accused of doing that by the PAN, as part of that party's very successful fear campaign.

Even if one chooses to believe that López Obrador on his own "pissed away" his poll lead, which ignores what actually happened on the ground, he never had anywhere near a "60-point" lead to piss away, never even half that.

As has been pointed out, the case was not heard before the Supreme Court but before the Federal Electoral Tribunal, also known as the TEPJF or the Trife. There was a citizens' effort to bring the matter to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the nature of the campaign and the vote-counting irregularities violated the constitutional right to fair and clear elections, but the ministers (justices) refused to take it up.

The López Obrador camp did in fact petition for a full recount before the tribunal. But it was judged not to be a legally valid request. The tribunal magistrates showed themselves to be legalistic sticklers, ruling that because not all 130,000 voting site results were challenged, they had no basis for ordering a recount of all of them.

It is true however, that annulment was probably ithe PRD's real goal, though the recount demand made for a better rallying cry. The simple reason for this is that the case for setting aside the election was stronger. Even the tribunal agreed that Fox and big business organizations improperly intervened in the campaign on behalf of Calderón, and that many of the PAN's attack ads (including the false link to Chávez) were out of bounds.

But the magistrates decided the interference and other campaign violations did not affect the outcome (an interesting opinion given the closeness of the vote) and in so deciding made exactly the kind of subjective interpretation of the evidence that they refused to make in the recount question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some clarification Posted by: jules_siegel
» RE: Some clarification Posted by: JDMB
» RE: Some clarification Posted by: mexdem
» RE: Some clarification Posted by: Jesse
AMLO is the Opposition to Mexico's Tweedle Dee/ Tweedle Dumb
Posted by: logansafi on Sep 20, 2006 10:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The contrast to how AMLO and Al Gore handled similar situations is striking. Gore just surrendered without any struggle whatsoever in the 2000 campaign, simply because it was elite opinion that mattered alone to him. And those elites favored Bush more. He was not prepared to struggle against corporate America, since he was the Tweedle Dumb candidate for them.

AMLO, in contrast, opposes the efforts to set up a similarly undemocratic Tweedle Dee/ Tweedle Dumb system run by corporate elites, so he struggles on. And make no mistake about it, all the Mexican and American elite groups want an undemocratic American style, Tweedle Dee/ Tweedle Dumb charade to take hold in Mexico. When Fox was handed the presidency from PRI that was the deal. It was no longer internationally respected to have a Mexican one party state dictatorship, so why not have two parties that were both identical in basic policies. That's what the gringo masters thought good for Mexico, too. It was probably part of the conditions for the US economic bailout brokered between Clinton and Zedillo that held together NAFTA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has It Dawned
Posted by: midwestblue on Sep 21, 2006 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has it dawned on anyone that had we not encouraged illegal immigration in this country, most of the people here would have voted for Obrador? The vote would have been more decisive and the protests would be massive. By coming here, the people of Mexico have left behind a country that will continue to support Vincente Fox's failed economic policies. We help no one when we encourage illegal immigration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Has It Dawned Posted by: JDMB
» RE: Has It Dawned Posted by: midwestblue
» RE: Has It Dawned Posted by: JDMB
» RE: Has It Dawned Posted by: midwestblue
» RE: Has It Dawned Posted by: ivansg
What side is Alternet?
Posted by: vescalant on Sep 23, 2006 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the last of a series of wishful thinking editorializing by Alternet on the Mexican election. During the past months the Alternet articles on the Mexican election have shown nothing but a blind faith on the right-wing system that Alternet seems to question in the first place. One wonders what's the real motivation of all those articles. The July 10, 2006 article Mexico: Calderon hasn't won by Joshua Holland, cites Robert Parsons, an expert on elections at American University, saying that "Mexico's electoral institutions -- considered among the best in the world -- have gotten far ahead of its political culture...[the seven Mexican magistrates] nominated by the Supreme Court and confirmed by a two-thirds majority in the Senate -- are respected legal scholars who serve long terms and are relatively insulated from outside pressure." Well, surprise, surprise, said magistrates just threw away Lopez Obrador's demand for a full recount of the ballots and awarded the election to right winger Calderon. Reports of a meeting of the magistrates with President Fox the day before the ruling have started to appear. So much for the "insulation" from outside pressure. An the barrage of Alternet articles praising the obviously tainted election continued like the July 5, 2006,
U.S. Media Should Butt Out of Mexico's Election by Chuck Collins saying "Mexico's systems for tracking votes and thwarting fraud are now more sophisticated that the U.S. system". Actually a recent statistical study by Mexican scientists showed that given the errors in the vote counting, a winner of the election could not possibly be declared (see the full highly technical article in by clicking here ) In a capitalist system that is so vital for the US, it is to be expected that a Supreme Court, the magistrates and the whole electoral system will be designed to give the victory to the right winger. So I wonder what so called American liberals were expecting from the Mexican election and why Alternet is so adamant in defending the credibility of an electoral system in such conditions. And by the way, the latest reports show that public trust in the electoral institute of Mexico is plumeting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What latest reports? Posted by: mexdem
» Polls.Schmolls Posted by: logansafi
» RE: Polls.Schmolls Posted by: mexdem
» RE: Polls.Schmolls Posted by: logansafi
» RE: Polls.Schmolls Posted by: mexdem
» RE: Polls.Schmolls Posted by: logansafi
AMLO Supporters Protest Walmart Involvement in Electoral Fraud
Posted by: logansafi on Sep 24, 2006 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The news this weekend is that AMLO's supporters have been protesting in various Mexico City Walmarts. This is meant to underline the US involvement in the fraud that handed the presidency to Calderon.

Walmart is Mexico's largest employer with over 800 stores and 100,000 employees there. Protesters accused Walmart of secretly and illegally distributing funding to commercials against AMLO. No, I'm sure the Walton family wouldn't do such a thing.... Now would they? Of course if they did, this would be a violation of Mexican electoral laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fraud and stupidity
Posted by: Manuel Alejandro Gómez on Sep 25, 2006 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
López Obrador although it is not a good one political, it was center of attacks of the great mafia in the one that the Mexican politics's converted great part, a discreet fraud puts an end to its presidential obsession. But let us also think of the great quantity of errors that made along their campaign; their arrogance didn't allow him to go to the first debate, according to him because it was indestructible and he didn't need to make it, calling " chachalaca " to president Fox subtracts him a great quantity of votes, the support that received from Hugo Chavez, and a great quantity of flimsy proposals as much in form as in content, made people to choose a marionette of the neoliberals and conservatives.

Could not to avoid those errors maybe have reverted the fraud?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]