Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Anti-Smoking Vaccine

By Jeffrey Helm, The Tyee. Posted September 30, 2006.


Scientists are getting close to creating a controversial vaccine against nicotine addiction.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Why I Want to Turn Religious People Into Atheists
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Citing "National Defense Needs," Obama Administration Says it Won't Sign Ban on Land Mines
Amy Goodman

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Jeffrey Helm

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Someday, along with jabs against mumps and measles, kids could get vaccinated against nicotine, cocaine and heroin.

Vaccines for cocaine and nicotine have already been tested in humans. Nicotine vaccines, in particular, are getting a lot of attention.

This summer a recruitment campaign got under way across the United States for clinical trials of NicVAX, a nicotine vaccine. Nabi Pharmaceuticals says it is developing NicVAX in order to help "billions worldwide who are addicted to smoking tobacco products or are at risk of becoming addicted."

But vaccines against a drug are different from normal vaccines against disease-causing viruses and bacteria. Normal vaccines prevent disease from taking hold. That is not the focus of drug vaccines like NicVAX.

"The target for [drug] vaccines right now is treatment or relapse prevention," says Dr. Paul Pentel from the University of Minnesota, one of the leading researchers in nicotine vaccine development. "It's simply way to early to know if vaccines would be appropriate for [addiction] prevention."

Even so, that won't prevent the off-label use of a product like NicVAX. Off-label use is when doctors prescribe a drug for something other than what it was originally meant for, and for some drugs, off-label use accounts for the bulk of their sales.

Whether the purpose is treatment or prevention, a vaccine made against a drug would soak up the drug and prevent it from working. Even if a smoker who was trying to quit slipped and lit up, the cigarette would just tar up their lungs a little more. No buzz, just stinky hot smoke. An effective nicotine vaccine would force you to quit cold turkey whether you wanted to or not. Which is both a strength and a potential problem of such treatments.

How an anti-drug vaccine works

Vaccines work by getting your body to produce antibodies, which are molecules designed to bind. They are tailor-made to latch onto and immobilize anything foreign that catches the attention of your immune system. Antibodies are also very specific. An antibody against a virus, like polio, won't work against anything else.

Normally the body does not make antibodies that target drugs because drug molecules are too small. They need to be small so that they can move easily from the blood to where they work in the brain.

In order for the immune system to make antibodies against a drug, a piece of the drug molecule is joined to a larger protein that the immune system will pay attention to. Then the body will start making antibodies that will grapple onto the drug.

With a standard immune response, other cells chew up bound antibodies, and whatever they are hanging onto. This does not happen with vaccines for drugs; the antibodies just stay latched to the drug molecules. But now the drug molecule is much bigger since it has an antibody stuck to it. So big, that the bound drug can't get into the brain to do any harm. Neither can it interact with anything else in the body.

A few party crashers help withdrawal

The intended use of NicVAX, and other drug vaccines in development, is to help people quit and stay clean.

In a small preliminary study, 40 per cent of smokers on NicVAX quit, as compared to a 9 per cent quit rate of those on a placebo (fake drug). "That differential was the largest differential of any smoking cessation product ever tested," Tom Rathjen, vice-president of investor relations for Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, said.

Great results, even when some of the nicotine is getting to the brain.

Shutting out the drug completely from the brain was the initial idea, but the antibodies made from NicVAX let a little nicotine through -- which actually isn't so bad. The small amount of nicotine that gets through lessens withdrawal symptoms, and for reasons that are not entirely clear, the entry of unbound nicotine into the brain is also slowed. This slowing of nicotine entry also reduces its addictive strength.

"The reinforcing properties of nicotine are greatest in the first few seconds or minutes after a puff of a cigarette," Pentel said. "If it's possible to slow the entry of nicotine into the brain, this could potentially reduce its subjective and its addictive effects."

But I don't like needles

Physicians have concerns with drug vaccines, like NicVAX, beyond possible allergic reactions that come with any vaccine. With a vaccine against a drug, whenever the drug is taken, bunches of antibody-drug formations fill the blood stream. When more than one antibody binds to a drug, the resulting clump, called an antigen-antibody complex, can cause problems. Dr. David Marsh, who is the head of Addiction Services for Vancouver Coastal Health, expressed concern that drug vaccine studies have not always looked at antigen-antibody complex effects because they are difficult to study. "I'm not sure if the trials to date have addressed the potential risks of that, like glomerular nephritis (kidney problems), or other problems that antigen-antibody complexes are known to cause." Although antigen-antibody complexes may still be a concern for other drug vaccines in development, for NicVAX it doesn't appear to be a problem. The antibodies produced with NicVAX bind nicotine one-to-one, so no antigen-antibody complexes would be formed that could damage the kidney. Another concern, and potential benefit, would be the longevity of the treatment. Some traditional vaccines against disease can give you immunity for life -- immunity that you cannot reverse. A lifelong effect is much more economical than a regime of pills, but, as a general rule, non-reversible treatments make doctors nervous. If something goes wrong, you cannot stop the treatment. Although NicVAX does last a long time, the effects are not lifelong, so the treatment should be reversible in time. Preliminary studies have shown that a treatment of NicVAX lasts for 12-18 months.

No more 'just say no'

The biggest controversy around drug vaccines is the possibility that the technology could be used to immunize people against drug use before they become addicted. Researchers say that it is much too early to even begin thinking about using vaccines for addiction prevention. But market forces being what they are, researchers don't have much say.

NicVAX is being fast-tracked for approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States, and if everything goes well, it could be on the market by late 2008.

Once NicVAX is on the shelves, there is nothing preventing doctors from prescribing it for the troubled child of parents worried that their offspring might pick up bad habits after school. Nabi recognizes that this off-label use of NicVAX could occur and is careful not to make any rash judgements. "That [preventative use] obviously becomes a controversial issue with many people," says Rathjen. "It would not be something that we are going to be pursuing, at least initially." But not all off-label use of NicVAX is as ethically questionable as childhood vaccinations.

Less controversial would be vaccinating pregnant mothers to protect developing children from the negative effects of their mother's drug use. Nabi is leaving their options open, but vaccinations in the interest of healthy babies aside, the debate on drug vaccines for addiction prevention might be closed before the ethical arguments even start. This is because drug vaccines don't provide absolute immunity. Especially for people who don't want to be immune.

The amount of antibodies that are produced in response to a vaccine are not limitless. Thus, if someone really wants to get high, they will just take more of the drug in order to overwhelm the antibodies in their system. But the amount of drug that would be needed to overwhelm the antibodies would be very high and dangerous to take, since it could very easily lead to an overdose. In the case of NicVAX, you'd have to smoke a whole lot of cigarettes. Rathjen said that NicVAX "was effective in animals that were given the equivalent of 20 packs of cigarettes a day."

Previous research also shows that people and animals don't take more of a drug in an effort to overwhelm the antibodies. But it is unlikely that the animals knew they could overwhelm the antibodies with more drug, and people that sign up to test a drug vaccine probably have at least a small desire to quit. "Vaccines [for addiction], like other medications, have to be used in appropriate populations," says Pentel. That population being people who want to stop using and abusing addictive drugs.

For overdoses, antibodies made to order

With vaccines it often takes time, and sometimes more than one injection, before there are enough antibodies in the body to get anything done. It takes around four injections of NicVAX over two months to get functional antibody levels. But in critical situations, like a drug overdose, you only have minutes, not months. The body needs time to make antibodies, but antibodies can be pre-made and injected into the bloodstream, which would be a useful tool for doctors. "If somebody arrives at the emergency room with an overdose, you could infuse them with a packet of antibodies and soak up the drug," explains Dr. Marsh. Pre-made drug antibodies would also have less safety concerns than vaccines because they wouldn't stay in the body as long. Where pre-made antibodies would be most beneficial is for other abused drugs besides nicotine.

Currently there is vaccine and antibody research being done for cocaine, heroin/morphine, methamphetamine, and phencyclidine (PCP).

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jeffrey Helm, a former neuroscientist, is writing about science and addiction issues for The Tyee this summer. Read his series here.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Daphna
Posted by: Daph on Sep 30, 2006 4:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a life-long smoker who's quit many times, I say bring it on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nice
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 30, 2006 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be nice if we could use this technique to solve all of the worst of our drug problems? We might even be able to cure our addiction to believing liers and mass murderers like the Bushies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nice - REAL NICE! Posted by: Cathyc
Be careful with your immune system
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 30, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sounds like the 'antabuse'program for alcoholics - from the encyclopedia:

"One of the popular modern drug treatments of alcoholism, initiated in 1948 by Erik Jacobsen of Denmark, uses disulfiram (tetraethylthiuram disulfide, known by the trade name Antabuse). Normally, as alcohol is converted to acetaldehyde, the latter is rapidly converted, in turn, to harmless metabolites. However, in the presence of disulfiram—itself harmless—the metabolism of acetaldehyde is blocked. The resulting accumulation of the highly toxic acetaldehyde results in such symptoms as flushing, nausea, vomiting, a sudden sharp drop of blood pressure, pounding of the heart, and even a feeling of impending death."

Will you get similar results with patients as thier bloodstream fills up with drug-bound antibodies? Maybe a few blood clots?

In any case, there could be serious problems with messing around with the immune system in this manner. The immune system is what keeps viral and bacterial infections from taking over (which is what happens in AIDS after HIV has damaged the immune system).

Debilitating childhood diseases like polio are another matter - but in those cases vaccines simply assist the natural process of fighting off viruses.

There's also the issue of acquired chemical sensitivty - sometimes people exposed to strong chemicals and solvents develop strong immune-related allergies to a wide variety of chemicals. Deliberately inducing this doesn't sound like a good idea!

As far as treating morphine-related overdoses (whether from heroin or oxycontin), naxolone has been used for a long time. For a rather grim example, see the Guardian story on the Moscow Theater opiate gas.

The author uses the word "NicVAX" a total of 20 times. Like most stories on anything pharmaceutical you see these days, this one should also be prefaced by "This Is An Advertisement".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah yes - Better Living Through Chemistry . . .
Posted by: JCR on Sep 30, 2006 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow - what a boon for Big Narco, er, I mean Big Rx. Better living through chemistry right? . . . that is until we discover the secret to inhibiting addiction is killing the recipient with a "rare" side-effect. Dropping dead from heart failure is one such quick cure. Remember Vioxx and how many people found "relief" from their osteoarthritis in the same manner? Can you say big payouts and fast-tracking? Expect more of the same for Nabi.

I'm always impressed how we continue to stress quick, chemical solutions to complex, chemical problems. Just as easily as chemicals ruined your life, you can turn to them as your savior; forget effort, force of will and a return to healthy diet and exercise. We have become an "eat and treat" society where you can stuff that 1500 calorie Big Mac down your throat 5 times a week because some statin will be there to pick up the slack.

- cue the clip of a geriatric husband and wife frolicking in a field of daisies -
*roll message in hurried and hushed voice*
Side effects may include: heart disease, temporary or permanent blindness, rash, hair loss, frequent urination, headache, weakness, dizziness, etc, etc . . .

Glad I won't be around to see America in a hundred years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Failure rate
Posted by: YogiBear on Sep 30, 2006 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who has written about smoking issues, I'd have to say that, if it bears out, that success rate is incredible. It could help many many people in this country and developing countries where smoking is extremely popular. But I'd like to know why there's still a high failure rate. Is it because some peoples' chemistry rejects the drug outright? Is it because some people's addiction is beyond chemistry and is more psychological in nature? Some other reason/s?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I quit coughing
Posted by: Melvin on Sep 30, 2006 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After 40 yrs I became a non smoker! I joined a support group of like minded people. The course was sponsored by our local Parks & Recreation Department,here in Canada, & boasts a 50% success rate. I 'believe' the Doctor involved donated his time for one hour per week for seven weeks. Our Parks & Rec Dept charged $50 & then gave back ,to those that completed the course, a two week pass to the gym or swimming pool. No one made any money out of this deal; except those that stopped smoking. For those not as fortunate as I , in having such a course available, I hope the drug works.
Now; how do I lose the weight I gained?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Experiment on me no more
Posted by: Revolutionary on Sep 30, 2006 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a person who has a number of chronic illnesses I have often been in the position of either having to suffer debilitating symptoms or let myself be experimented on by the medico-industrial complex. I have developed lithium toxicity which wiped out my memory and half of my vocabulary for six months. I have aquire diabetes and neuropathy which leave me in constant pain because Zyprexa destroyed my pancreas and I have also aquired a permanent and painful motor disturbance called Tardive Dyskinesia which will never go away whether I quit taking the class of drugs that caused it or not. Now they want me to take Lyrica which costs $214.00 a month for the neuropathic pain they caused instead of Methadone which is actually effective and costs $4.00 a month. Stop experimenting on me. Don't give me the latest and the greatest at $10 dollars a pill. Screw your stockholders, Lilly and Merck and Roxane. Marijuana and opiates are ten times safer than the latest FDA approved poison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IBOGA
Posted by: dermott on Sep 30, 2006 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i don't quite understand how preventing the reinforcing effect of nicotine primarily in someone who is already addicted or on their path to becoming so is going to actually be able to break the cycle of addiction. i don't know exactly how this "vaccine" would be administered but i'm assuming that it is not like an MMR, meaning you don't just get one shot and you're covered for life. i imagine you need to get some sort of booster and i imagine fairly regularly. how is this any different than antabuse. if i'm an alcoholic trying to quit drinking and i have a bad week, all i have to do is stop taking antabuse and in a few days i can go on a bender. in fact most of the reports of antabuse success are in cases where the patient is under some sort of court order and/or supervision to ensure that they take the antabuse. in other words, for an alcoholic, there is absolutely no difference between quitting on your own and having the self determination to do so and having the self determination to take antabuse. in fact, if you consistently take your antabuse, sort of by definition, you don't need to take antabuse. because if you really wanted to have a drink, all you would have to do is not take the antabuse. that's why they make you and watch you take it in many cases. so if i really want to have a smoke and i really want to enjoy it, then why the hell am i going to continue to get the vaccine. by getting the vaccine i am essentially accomplishing the same thing as not getting the vaccine because getting it is already proving that i have what it takes in my personal situation not to smoke. it's not like this vaccine or any other anti-addiction drug changes the underlying personal reasons why you are an addict. and blocking one addiction doesn't mean it won't manifest in other ways. and none of these drugs address greater societal issues that lead to addiction. most addicts aren't addicts because of the inherently addictive qualities of certain substances. addicts become that way initially from self medicating. how can you treat addiction when the addiction itself initially began as a treatment for something else. our concept of addiction is completely backwards. just as a note, and if you disagree with anything else i've said please pay attention to this... the one substance that has shown the most superior effectiveness over any other treatment, drug, vaccine, therapy, hypnosis (everything) is something known as ibogaine or iboga. not only is it effective in treating addiction but it often works with one administration or dose and works for a long long time if not indefinitely and it works for all addictions... alcohol, tobacco, narcotics, etc., probably even sex, food and gambling. look it up. by the way as should come as no surprise, it is illegal in this country (hmm, but cigarettes aren't). there are treatment centers in canada, mexico, the carribean and worldwide however the cost in my opinion means that it is inaccesible to a majority of people (which is why it should be legal and accepted here so it becomes more accessible and affordable). in general, most of the naturally occurring classic psychedelic drugs have a tendency towards anti-addiction and are themselves non-addictive... i.e. psilocybin mushrooms, peyote, iboga, ayahuasca, perhaps salvia and even some synthetics such as LSD and snythetic DMT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IBOGA Posted by: Plexius
» RE: IBOGA Posted by: memerot
The narrow end of the wedge
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Sep 30, 2006 9:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not something that works against addiction specifically, it works by eliminating the effects of the drug, rendering it inert.

What the govt. would really like to see is a vaccine against the effects of marijuana, which is already in the works.

Why?
Because they can.

Next- the holy grail of the thought police- would be a vaccine cocktail conferring permanent immunity to LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, and any similar compounds.

Once these exist, parents will be strongly pressured to give them to their kids- it's the responsible thing to do. The "good schools" will all want to see your drug vaccination records before they admit you.
And any workplace that currently drug tests will just give the shots instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The narrow end of the wedge Posted by: meetmeineleusis
Magic
Posted by: talkville on Sep 30, 2006 11:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what would be next, in the chain of addictions? A vaccine against gluttony? A vaccine against profit? A vaccine against power? A vaccine against sex? A vaccine against gambling?

We're in the age of magic. We're in the age of priests. We're in the age of Shamans.

There have been smokers who have brought up momentous questions.

It's not about addiction, it's about control. It's about power. It's begun with smoking. And it's only begun. Comfy or not, slavery by any other name remains slavery. There's always that one above the fray - the one who will control by any means necessary. The power to define is the most awesome power fo all. It's about power and control. It's about magic. In the end, there's the Master and here's the Slave.

It begins with smoking and with nicotine; it surely doesn't end there. Now, I have an appointment for my bi-weekly vaccine against justice, equality and liberation. Don't forget your appointment!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No cigarettes for four weeks...
Posted by: bambic on Oct 1, 2006 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because after ten years of smoking, I chose to stop. In spite of all of the stress I have in my life, I simply decided that smoking sucks. That may sound strangely simplistic, but those who continually talk about how hard it is to quit just pertetuate that idea to the point where no one even tries to quit because all they hear is "it's SO hard".
Well, if I can do it, so can you.
One thing that helped is my cat: when he heard the sound of my lighter, he'd squint his eyes and run out of the room. I credit him with helping me decide to stop this stinking habit. And not only am I proud of myself, my house and hair don't reek and I have twice the energy, like I did before I started. So there, big tobacco.
When you finish a pack, don't buy anymore.
It's NOT that hard, no matter what you hear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep posting Posted by: Plexius
What about the REALLY hardcore smokers?
Posted by: Plexius on Oct 1, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know people so addicted that, if they couldn't get their nicotine fix, they would turn to something harder JUST TO MASK THE CRAVINGS. Will NicVAX lead to vaccinated, harcore smokers turning to hardcore drugs (tho' nicotine isn't exactly a sissy drug)? Did that 60% who didn't stop become heroin addicts or drown their suffering in a booze haze?

Hope this drug works, but have seen way too many failures of drugs that are supposed to help people, but wind up hurting them more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't understand the concerns in this article
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Oct 1, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds like the 12-steppers who think, hey, I did it the hard way, so everyone else has to. Caroline Knapp used to write op-ed pieces saying just that. Now if only they can come up with a vaccine for alcohol craving, so you don't have to go to those damn meetings...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Ban Cigarettes
Posted by: sacha_arilad on Oct 1, 2006 11:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cocaine is illegal. So is heroin. The solution here is exactly the same. Just make smoking illegal and ban cigarettes. It will save billions in health care costs and save the rest of us non-smokers from breathing in toxic stuff and polluting our lungs. It's a win-win solution for all (except the ciggie manufacturers but who gives a flying fig about them).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Ban Cigarettes Posted by: Plexius
» Yeah, Prohibition has worked in the past Posted by: meetmeineleusis
this is insane
Posted by: jessicalh on Oct 9, 2006 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're called nicotinic receptors for a reason. When we have antibodies for, say, heroin, and they end up being too close to natural endorphins, and there are people screaming in pain at bruises, will this be the occassion of more "buck up and take it" rhetoric? When diaper sales go through the roof, will we consider this as just desserts for people who can't manage a cholinergic addiction? This is _nuts_. We do not understand these systems sufficiently to be siccing(sic) our immune systems on them.

Who needs third world drug testing? Just tell Americans its something they want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fantastic work
Posted by: penhallow on Oct 16, 2006 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm so glad researchers are making progress in the fight against addiction!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X-Men #3
Posted by: mrfrankg on Dec 20, 2006 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds familiar... or is it like Doc Savage's crime clinic...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement