Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

As Pissed as Ever, Young Voters Get Organized

By Scott Thill, WireTap. Posted September 20, 2006.


The League of Young Voters -- born in 2003 as the League of Pissed Off Voters -- is mobilizing young people across the country to make a difference in the midterm elections and a neighborhood near you.
young
Advertisement

I first talked to William Wimsatt for Salon back in 2004 about the book he compiled with Adrienne Maree Brown called "How to Get Stupid White Men Out of Office: The Anti-Politics, Un-boring Guide to Power," when his newly founded League of Pissed Off Voters had yet to finish off its first year. Back then, the "Bomb the Suburbs" and "No More Prisons" author and one-time grafitti artist (who once tagged his creations as "Upski" but would rather go by the simpler "Billy" nowadays) and his team of tireless activists were waging the uphill battle against the ever-encroaching threat of the Bush administration's second term.

We all know how that struggle turned out, but that's not to say that they didn't put up a hell of a fight. The politically astute organizers of the League of Pissed Off Voters helped push the 18-30 demographic off the couch and into the polls in numbers not seen since Nixon, otherwise known to historians, wonks and Dickens fans as "the ghost of George W. Bush's past."

And that's not all: Wimsatt's plucky League infiltrated the homes and hoods of those that the Bush administration had left for dead (literally, in the case of Katrina), including African-Americans and Latinos, who made up over 50 percent of the new voters on the block. It built scores of local groups that made it their goal to inform individuals who felt locked out of the political process because of their age, color, creed or credit rating, as well as a PAC that drafted up hundreds of thousands of essential voter guides that helped swing much-needed contests, small and large.

Better yet, they stuck around after the election, unlike other organizations that open and close their doors only for election season, as if it were an event of strictly seasonal significance to the rest of the nation (like Halloween or Black History Month, for that matter), rather than the life-or-death, spend-or-save proposition that it was.

pennsylvania indy voters 1
Members of the League's Pennsylvania chapter at an anti-war bicycle rally.

They staged nationally broadcasted investigations into the rampant vote-jacking of Ohio that, at least according to muckrakers like Greg Palast and high-society politicos like Robert Kennedy Jr., handed Bush the 2004 election, just as similar shenanigans in Florida handed him the 2000 election. And although the League of Pissed Off Voters would eventually shed their arch colloquialism to become the more accessible League of Young Voters, its laser focus on the Achilles' heel of neoconservative dominance -- voter ignorance and inaction -- has grown only more accurate.

Since then, its members have grown in numbers, support and strength, and are gearing up for the exceedingly important 2006 and 2008 elections as if their lives depend on it. Because they do.

Rethinking youth empowerment

"I was working at McClymonds High School in West Oakland doing youth empowerment and development work, but was starting to wonder what the point of doing leadership work was when there weren't going to be any changes at the state level," confesses Natasha Marsh, director for the League's San Francisco chapter and overall director for California state operations, about her decision to join up with Wimsatt's spirited crew. "There wouldn't be any jobs or places to live anyway. I wanted people with all this leadership potential to have actual spaces where they could enter society. I really wanted to work with young people to change that systemic problem."

The problem is a major one. The youth of America are the ones who fight its wars, pay its exorbitant college fees and inherit the ballooning debt it creates at the expense of generations yet to be born. Although more wired than ever, they are nevertheless estranged from the political process, one that helps determine their fates at crucial times in their unfolding lives. And exploring and tackling those reasons are paramount to the League's mission to break the cycle of disconnection among young voters.

"More often that not, when I talk to young people who don't or won't vote," Marsh adds, "it's because they don't feel they have enough information and are scared of making the wrong decision. No one is explaining how it all works to them, what the connections are between their young lives, their communities and the overall political system. Voting is one thing, but knowing its connection to why your school is being closed is another."


Digg!

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared in Wired, Salon, XLR8R, LA Weekly, AOL and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
young
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 23, 2006 1:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These young people can teach us older folks a lot about how to make our warped society become a surviveable society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History always says otherwise
Posted by: longlivecheney on Sep 23, 2006 1:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys tried it last time and it didn't work. Won't work this time either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: History always says otherwise Posted by: longlivecheney
Change doesn't happen over night!
Posted by: jleo on Sep 23, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is good but people need to understand that the changes we seek will not occur over night. The Labor Movement, the Civil Rights Movement, The Women's Movement all had periods and reisstance (still do) before they were able to turn the society around. There will be many failures, but remember one step forward two steps back Courage everyone. We will need it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change doesn't happen over night!
Posted by: jleo on Sep 23, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is good but people need to understand that the changes we seek will not occur over night. The Labor Movement, the Civil Rights Movement, The Women's Movement all had periods and reisstance (still do) before they were able to turn the society around. There will be many failures, but remember one step forward two steps back Courage everyone. We will need it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great News
Posted by: joyceguard on Sep 23, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations to the League of Young Voters. I can't think of any group more in need to be involved in the election process. It is for my grandchildren that I decided I had to become more involved than I already was in order to save democracy, lower the debt being left to them, keep them from being killed or maimed in the unnecessary wars of the neo-cons, etc. I have long been involved in the women's moverment and know all too well how long it takes to make changes but women are better off today than they were because of the changes the movement brought. Our young people will also be better off because of the changes this group of young people do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy
Posted by: Gatsby on Sep 23, 2006 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracy, in all it's forms, is indeed an interesting social construct.

It seems intuitive that every relatively sane adult has a natural right to represent themselves within their respective communities. That's easy. Further, a small scale, pure democracy, is probably the best form of civilized government, as long as individuals fully comprehend they are members of a collective, too. But, this important awareness - that we are individuals and members, simultaneously - is where things fall apart.

The falling apart has a name -- republican democracy. As is clearly evident, republican or representative democracy sets it's citizens - and the groups individuals most closely identify with - against one another ... blacks against whites, conservationists against developers, the rich against the poor. The process of republican democracy actually creates and nourishes many of the social stereotypes and generalizations its adherents so passionately despise.

For democracy to be a just form of government, it must be small-in-scale, based on long-term sustainability and fully accountable to it's members. Democracy without accountability is simply the tyranny of the majority. It's similar to the idea of freedom. Freedom is the greatest notion, but freedom without responsibility is merely theft. A tyranny of the majority is what we endure here in these United States of America.

I often wonder why so many people believe there resides some great hidden understanding lying in the voting masses of democratic republicans. What is this deep wisdom those who haven't even bothered to register will bring to our nation?

Here's a snippet from the essay:

"Young people spend their entire lives receiving information in the top-down format, and the more that information tends to be biased in the best case or bullshit in the worst, the less respect their elders get."

Young people "spend their entire lives "? What?

In republican democracy it's us against them ... me against you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

League of Pissed Off Voters?
Posted by: JCR on Sep 23, 2006 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
League of Increasingly Irate But Mainly Apathetic Voters is more like it . . . That pretty much describes America as a whole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: League of Pissed Off Voters? Posted by: Elmowilcox
history maybe
Posted by: john henry on Sep 23, 2006 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
greed for power an control of the masses an all the money you have to break the tie of power of gov. an corp. money an make the gov. body accountable for there actions an make corp. accountale for there deeds but you can not do this because we all work for the money an more things it can buy that we do not need or use one or two times a year an we all have to have the newes set of wheels in the parking lot or have the hots suit or dress in the office so lets put the money in the bank account for ourselfs not the corps. now the 401k is great for the corp. take your money to a good investment company an let then work for you not the company oh they have have low fees you may come out better iam

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apathetic, American, and Bankrupt!
Posted by: eddie torres on Sep 24, 2006 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tough to find the polling station and stand in line 2 hours when you're 23 and working double shifts at Starbuck's to pay for your ex-wife and 2 kids.

Make every federal election a national holiday: all of a sudden every working-class Bubba and wage-slave urbanite will show up and check the same boxes on the ballot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How many more stolen elections will Americans tolerate?
Posted by: LeftWright on Sep 24, 2006 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2000 Gore beat Bush by 150,000 votes in Florida, but the Rove/Baker machine pulled off the coup of the century by getting the Supreme Court to select Bush 5 to 4.

In 2004 Kerry beat Bush by 4.6% nationally, but the Rove machine stole the election in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Mexico and Ohio (to name only the key states) using voter suppression and outright electoral fraud.

How many more stolen elections will Americans tolerate?

The youth vote did turn out in 2004, but their votes were "lost" or switched to Bush. When this happens again, and it will, what will these young voters do? Will they turn away from electoral politics or will this further energize them to insure that their votes count? Many will become discouraged, but enough will be outraged to fight for their political future and the future of their country. This dynamic will play a significant part in the historic events of the near future.

More electoral "miracles" will happen on November 7th and the Republicans will stave off the much needed investigations of their corrupt, criminal and murderous activities for a little longer.

However, sometime in the next three years the price of oil will move past $100/barrel and may become priced in a currency other than the USD (Euro, probably). Either event will lead to a collapse of the U.S. economy (if the now bursting housing bubble hasn't already), and a re-focussed and re-energized electorate.

Simultaneously, enough Americans will have learned and accepted the truth about 9/11/01 and will be primed to revolt against the corrupt plutocracy now destroying the U.S. Complicit Republicans and denying Democrats will be swept aside and replaced with reformers committed to our Constitution and its democratic ideals. Electoral integrity will be restored, sunshine laws passed, public campaign finance will become a reality and government will be scaled to solve the problems it addresses.

Yes, the problems we face in the future are daunting, but Americans are strong, smart, creative and diverse enough to meet all the challenges ahead.

We really do have nothing to fear but fear itself.

The truth shall set you free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I laughed when I first saw this title...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Sep 25, 2006 1:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As Pissed as Ever, Young Voters Get Organized"

In Australia, to "be pissed" means to be drunk. X-}

"Pissed off" is the same, either side of the Pacific.



Oh well, good luck to 'em!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DIEBOLD HIDES FROM PRINCETON RESEARCH
Posted by: TheStranger on Sep 25, 2006 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NT TIMES BUSINESS SECTION
Sept. 24, 2006
Big Gamble on Electronic Voting
By RANDALL STROSS
HANGING chads made it difficult to read voter intentions in 2000. Hotel minibar keys may do the same for the elections in November.
The mechanics of voting have undergone a major change since the imbroglio that engulfed presidential balloting in 2000. Embarrassed by an election that had to be settled by the Supreme Court, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which provided funds to improve voting equipment.
From 2003 to 2005, some $3 billion flew out of the federal purse for equipment purchases. Nothing said “state of the art” like a paperless voting machine that electronically records and tallies votes with the tap of a touch screen. Election Data Services, a political consulting firm that specializes in redistricting, estimates that about 40 percent of registered voters will use an electronic machine in the coming elections.
One brand of machine leads in market share by a sizable margin: the AccuVote, made by Diebold Election Systems. Two weeks ago, however, Diebold suffered one of the worst kinds of public embarrassment for a company that began in 1859 by making safes and vaults.
Edward W. Felten, a professor of computer science at Princeton, and his student collaborators conducted a demonstration with an AccuVote TS and noticed that the key to the machine’s memory card slot appeared to be similar to one that a staff member had at home.
When he brought the key into the office and tried it, the door protecting the AccuVote’s memory card slot swung open obligingly. Upon examination, the key turned out to be a standard industrial part used in simple locks for office furniture, computer cases, jukeboxes — and hotel minibars.
Once the memory card slot was accessible, how difficult would it be to introduce malicious software that could manipulate vote tallies? That is one of the questions that Professor Felten and two of his students, Ariel J. Feldman and J. Alex Haldeman, have been investigating. In the face of Diebold’s refusal to let scientists test the AccuVote, the Princeton team got its hands on a machine only with the help of a third party.
Even before the researchers had made the serendipitous discovery about the minibar key, they had released a devastating critique of the AccuVote’s security. For computer scientists, they supplied a technical paper; for the general public, they prepared an accompanying video. Their short answer to the question of the practicality of vote theft with the AccuVote: easily accomplished.
The researchers demonstrated the machine’s vulnerability to an attack by means of code that can be introduced with a memory card. The program they devised does not tamper with the voting process. The machine records each vote as it should, and makes a backup copy, too.
Every 15 seconds or so, however, the rogue program checks the internal vote tallies, then adds and subtracts votes, as needed, to reach programmed targets; it also makes identical changes in the backup file. The alterations cannot be detected later because the total number of votes perfectly matches the total number of voters. At the end of the election day, the rogue program erases itself, leaving no trace.
On Sept. 13, when Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy posted its findings, Diebold issued a press release that shrugged off the demonstration and analysis. It said Princeton’s AccuVote machine was “two generations old” and “not used anywhere in the country.”
I spoke last week with Professor Felten, who said he could not imagine how a newer version of the AccuVote’s software could protect itself against this kind of attack. But he also said he would welcome the opportunity to test it. I called Diebold to see if it would lend Princeton a machine.
[More]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Power of the Positive
Posted by: grammasanity on Sep 25, 2006 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we all please stop saying "It'll never work"? Of course change will happen. The youth vote elected Bill Clinton, and it can defeat the current grinches, too. I want to hear IDEAS. We all know what's wrong, or think we do. How about celebrating and enlarging on new ideas that might be better? You go, youth. We old farts are pissed off, too. But y'all have the energy to break the grinches' hold on the world, by peaceful means or otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Contructive Activism Entails
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Sep 25, 2006 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Political activism, if it is to be meaningful, must (as the term implies) involve action. Precisely what action? Defiance of the government, and, therefore, breaking the Law. Required is the willingness to sacrifice a comfortable life; to risk unemployment, jail time, unpopularity, and potentially death. Bertrand Russell, in “Proposed Roads to Freedom,” reminds us that:

“The pioneers of Socialism, Anarchism, and Syndicalism have, for the most part, experienced prison, exile, and poverty, deliberately incurred because they would not abandon their propaganda; and by this conduct they have shown that the hope which inspired them was not for themselves, but for mankind.”

If the “system” is defective the only logical alternative is to posit that system as the antagonist and to, if possible ignore it; and, if necessary, fight to destroy it (both options, by definition, illegal). To “work within the system” means in practice, irrespective of the position one professes, supporting that system, perhaps only tacitly to begin with, and ultimately, if one hopes to continue one’s career, actively defending it. (E.g., Imagine joining the Nazi party with the aim of opposing anti-Semitism; if allowed, one’s actions would, at best, amount to “dissenting” rhetoric of no practical consequence.)

It is worth reiterating the following truism: All that we should be concerned with is what politicians do and we should ignore what they say. The assertions of politicians are almost always meaningless and when they are not are either false or indifferent to the truth. However, the positive choices they make (which must be concrete choices in practice regardless of how vague or obscure they may be made to seem) and the consequences those choices have for other people are what, in fact, anyone sincere in aiming to solve our problems must consider exclusively.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]