Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Cable News Confidential

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted September 19, 2006.


FAIR co-founder, media critic and former Fox News commentator Jeff Cohen explains the importance of independent media and what it'll take to outfox Rupert Murdoch.
091906story
091906story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Don Hazen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Having worked for all three major cable news channels, Jeff Cohen has witnessed firsthand how corporate media conglomerates are killing our democracy. He talked to AlterNet's executive editor Don Hazen about his experiences and his new book "Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media" (PoliPoint Press, 2006). Two video clips of his appearances with Robert Novak on CNN's "Crossfire" in 1996 are also available: "For Vengeance" and "Feminist Weenies."

Don Hazen: You were a Fox on-air personality for years and are a red-blooded American progressive. Isn't it ironic that you had a semicomfortable home at the premier right-wing network?

Jeff Cohen: It was more than ironic, it was a fluke. I was allowed to stay on the air primarily because I was a weekender. I wasn't ready for prime time. I can remember a couple incidents where Sean Hannity came into the green room when our show, "Fox NewsWatch," was waiting to go on. A couple of the people started haranguing him, saying, "When are you going to have a debate with Jeff Cohen? Are you afraid of him?" I survived -- it was a media criticism show. I was able to say things that you wouldn't normally be able to do anywhere else on Fox News. I mean, I regularly criticized Fox News and Rupert Murdoch by name. There were a couple of times I thought my career was in jeopardy, but it's important for people to realize I left Fox News on my own.

Hazen: We've got a couple of clips of you going at it with Robert Novak (VIDEO: For Vengeance, and Feminist Weenies), who's been at the center of the Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame scandal. Tell us a little bit about the Prince of Darkness.

Cohen: That's the funny thing about the Prince of Darkness -- he was always good for me. When you're on cable news and you're in an ideological debate, it's great to be going up against someone who seems to concede the center, and almost pushes himself to the extreme. Like when we did our debate on the death penalty and he's basically saying, "I don't care if it's a deterrent, I want vengeance." I'd already compared him to the ayatollahs of Iran, and I'd said that Western democratic countries had all moved toward the abolition of the death penalty, and he sort of said those countries are maybe too civilized.

There was an important moment -- the exact quote is in the book -- where I asked him during a break, "Are you further right of Pat Buchanan?" He said, "Well, Buchanan is taking liberal democratic principles now. I was an Eisenhower Republican in the '50s and I've moved further right every year since." He's boasting about it. When I heard that, I thought to myself, there's no one close to that on TV who can say, "I was a Kennedy Democrat in the '60s and I've moved further left every year since." What you have on TV is usually the conservative Democrats debating the conservative Republicans.

Hazen: What about Roger Ailes? Is he a genius, or does he just happen to be in a lucky spot?

Cohen: I think it's both. He's a brilliant propagandist. He was brilliant when he had 30-second attack ads going after Dukakis, and he's brilliant now that he's got 24/7 handed to him by Rupert Murdoch, the right-wing media mogul owner of Fox. It's very lucky when someone who thinks visually, as Ailes does, and is skilled at political propaganda of the lowest common denominator, and a media mogul comes along and says, "OK, you run it." Obviously Ailes had no background in journalism.

Hazen: What about Rupert? He just paid half a billion dollars for MySpace, the most popular destination for young people on the web; he now owns satellite DirecTV. Why does Murdoch seem to be smarter than the rest of the media moguls?

Cohen: He's got a little more of a killer instinct, I think. He was one of the first to global, and he always understood that you have to go immediately for the centers of political power. He endorsed Carter over Ted Kennedy because he wanted something from Carter.

Hazen: Now he's supporting Hillary in New York.

Cohen: Right. Now he's close to her and held a fund-raiser for her at the News Corp. building in midtown Manhattan in July. He's always been great at cozying up to national power across the continents. He's even done it in China -- in China, he's suppressed materials, he's had a book suppressed. He kept communicating to the leadership there that he would go soft on them, and he was in there before most of the others, in a bigger way than most of the other corporate media conglomerates. I just think he's very skillful at wielding the levers of power, very close to Tony Blair in England. It has to be understood that you always hear that this is called "Bush's war," but it was, in many ways, Rupert Murdoch's war. He sold this war across continents.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
TV
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 19, 2006 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need real news on TV not Rupert or NBC propaganda. We don't have a democracy when all major TV outlets are run by thieving CEOs and fawning Bushie supporters. We are moving toward a genuine fascist police state where news, propaganda and voting are all controlled by a Bushie police state. If the Republicans control both houses of congress after the 06 "election" then doom is almost here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TV Posted by: xi_people
» RE: TV Posted by: Lauren
» RE: TV Posted by: gerry632000
» RE: TV Posted by: rsaxto
» Media are owned by Jews.. Posted by: exhibit
» RE: TV Posted by: gerry632000
» RE: TV Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: TV Posted by: grammasanity
Rupert Murdoch
Posted by: Steve Adair on Sep 19, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It has to be understood that you always hear that this is called "Bush's war," but it was, in many ways, Rupert Murdoch's war. He sold this war across continents."

Why did he do that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why did he do that? Posted by: ankhet
» RE: why did he do that? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: why did he do that? Posted by: babs
» RE: why did he do that? Posted by: greekTowner
» RE: why did he do that? Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Rupert Murdoch Posted by: nelsestu
O'Reilly guts.
Posted by: colinmeister on Sep 19, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill O'Reilly is always accusing guests, especially Hollywood celebrities who won't go on his show, of not having the guts to come on the air with him. I've got the guts, but we've got to see whether Bill O'Reilly is macho enough, whether he's got the guts to have me on.

The reason people will not appear on the O'Reilly Factor is that the show is not what it appears to be to the viewers.

As I understand it, the show is recorded in the afternoon prior to the evening showing, and that the interviews are much longer than the piece shown on TV.

The raw recording of any interview is then edited by the Faux News censors, who cut out parts not in line with their thinking, and in the case of a left winger, they can cut the interview to make the interviewee appear stupid, inconsistant, or ridiculous.

I would like to hear the author's views on the manipulation of interviews on Faux News Channel. As a former employee he should know a thing or two.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How powerful?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 19, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then you point out that some of these corporations are also funding Bill Clinton or Joe Lieberman, and that's why they're getting policies that favor the insurance industry, for example. That kind of thing is really powerful.

Click on opensecrets.org it's all there for everyone to see. Who gives, who gets, and how much. One would think, as I did, that the revelation that the same industries finance both parties would move people to act but it doesn't. Even when they see the results of this bribery they seem to be complacent.

The "defense" industries, the pharmaceuticals, the financial industries invest heavily in both parties. They sow millions and reap billions. Is it a coincidence then that after the cold war ended our "defense" budget wasn't cut, that the senior citizen's prescription drug plan benefits the pharmaceutical and insurance industries, or that the bankruptcy laws reforms favor the credit card companies? I don't think so. Our government is run by the corporate establishment and for the corporate establishment.

Can we vote the corporatocracy out of power? No! Can we get meaningful campaign finance laws while they're in power? No! Will the Democrats save us? No! Should we vote for the Democrats because they're not Republicans? No! We should vote for a party who'll do something for us. I don't mean a third party I mean that we should change both existing parties.

How much longer will the unions and the left vote for the lesser of the evils? The steady move toward the corporate state by both parties shows that it's a losing strategy. We need a new one.

The corporatocracy is successful because they control both parties and dictate the (unspoken) platforms of both parties. I think that the only way to beat this strategy is for the people to dictate the platforms of both parties.

I think that the way to do this is for each individual voter to tell both parties that he/she won't vote for a candidate who doesn't support his/her most important issue. This gives both parties the opportunity to earn your vote. This puts them in competition for your vote. Tell them that if neither wants your vote you'll write in a protest vote for "Honest Abe".

Join The Lincoln Initiative. I costs nothing and will only take five minutes of your time. Time is short; do it now.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director. The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How powerful? California race. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: How powerful? Posted by: 4sense
» RE: not vote on a party platform Posted by: Lincoln fan
Indie Muckrakers are the New Fourth Estate
Posted by: wawa on Sep 19, 2006 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bloggers with a passion for TRUTH and the means to GO and seek it are doing what Muckrakers have always done when "media and governments shield the whole truth, We who are wide awake are compelled by the "fierce urgency of Now"[Rev MLK] to raise awareness and promote the human dialogue about many of the crucial issues of our day: the state of our Union and in protection of democracy, what life is like for Christians in Israel Palestine in the 21st Century, nuclear weapons, the environment, science, medicine, theology and spirituality. [WAWA BLOG Mission Statement]




Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS-Article 19.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MSM - lapdogs of propaganda since the National Security Act
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Sep 19, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The information is available in the national security archives. Everything from religion to racial hate has been used as propaganda by Washington and put out by all forms of media. What history is written for us to learn is a fabrication of the lies we see or read from this form of journalism. The internet has a short time to live too, as the defense department considers it a threat to the real owners of America. Groups like Project Censored is important to point out issues that the press doesn't touch.

TVNews Lies may not be perfect, but it has spoken out loudly about the media as it really is: the lapdog press is a propaganda machine.
www.tvnewslies.com/html/lapdog_press.html

Alternet is unusual in that they allow discussion that can disagree with the topic. That is rare in most all other web media. The independent press often times isn't. Many liberal and progressive sites have gotten bad in this respect, but the rabbid right is foaming at the mouth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deport Rupert Murdoch
Posted by: Democritus on Sep 19, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We now all know that the alien Australian, Rupert Murdoch, helped get us into a war by feeding the American public lies. He did it to enrich himself and his corporate cronies, and because of people like him and the ghouls he hires to peddle his lies on FOX, brave American men and women go off to die in foreign wars. Americans deplore the danger of there being 11 million illegal aliens in our country. But there is far more danger in having a single Mr. Murdoch on the scene. Isn't it time we yank his privileges and send him back to where he came from? The dead heart of Australia, with no one to talk to but dingoes and wallabies, seems an appropriate destination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deport Rupert Murdoch Posted by: krose
Ms. FB Murphy
Posted by: stippolito on Sep 19, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoyed your interview and am so very thankful that I can hear Amy Goodman every week day and Air America as well.
I hope and hope that someone will help Air America survive the reported bankruptcy. Randy Rhodes and Rachel Maddox
are the strong voices of liberalism on radio...significant that these three women carry strong voices to hopefully, save our democracy.
Quite frankly, the huge debate about Geneva Conventions and dumbya's purported "clarifications" are once again the
obfuscations he and his cabal are notorious in using.
Please point out again and again the manipulation of language these fascists are so adept at. Thanks again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE "VAST WASTELAND" THAT IS CABLE NEWS!
Posted by: krose on Sep 19, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I HAD HOPED THAT WITH DAN ABRAMS APPOINTMENT AS General Manager at MSNBC, things would start to improve, but I was wrong! Things seem to be getting much worse! "Gravelly-voiced" Rita Cosby, (whose voice sounds like a nail scratching a chalk-board,) having lost her low-rated, "trash TV" evening program, now is on "sandwiched" between news items during the day. The irritating, Right-Wing bow-tied, Tucker Carlson, has moved into Dan's earlier hour, sans the bow-tie, but just as irritating! Joe Scarborough, in trying to appear less radically Right-Wing as he was when he led the effort to impeach Bill Clinton, now has moved into Rita Cosby's area of "trash-talk!" Chris Matthews remains obnoxiously loud, uncouth, and in need of neuroleptic medication, as well as a course on "manners," to teach him about not interrupting his guests! The ONLY program I WANT TO WATCH ON PRIME TIME MSNBC IS THE VERY WONDERFUL KEITH OLBERMANN! KEITH IS A "GEM," AND I AM POSITIVE THAT HE MUST BE THE "BANE" OF THIS ADMINISTRATION!

CNN is not much better! Wolff Blitzer is given a forum consisting of 15 weekday hours and 2 hours on Sunday for his BORING PERSONALITY, and his "PRESSTITUTE" (more lower-key, manipulative, RIGHT-WING) AGENDA! I do NOT like him, but occasionally watch him during the week, JUST to watch Jack Cafferty! I think Lou Dobbs is excellent, and Anderson Cooper is O.K. The network, in general, is tilted too "Right," except for Dobbs and Cafferty(who were "Right", but now are just plain "HONEST," and can see the reality of what is going on in this administration), and I cannot abide watching, except for some of the minor players, such as Carol Lin and Federika Whitfield. THEY ARE CERTAINLY NOT THE "MOST TRUSTED NETWORK," AS THEY LIKE TO SAY THEY ARE!

As for FOX, "FAIR AND BALANCED?" GIVE ME A BREAK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As usual, the color of the problem is green.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 19, 2006 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terrific article, and Jeff Cohen is very insightful. But (isn't there always a "but?"), I doubt that the democrats will take him up on his advice as to how to win the next election. Jeff says:

"I think the most effective issue is economic populism. Point out who really runs our economy and our political systems, how corrupt it is and how behind-closed-doors it is. That'll open up people's eyes even if they disagree with you on gay rights or abortion rights."

Jeff is correct; that would be very effective. The democrats' problem, however, is that too many of them are feeding from the same trough as the the republicans and are just as fearful of upsetting the gravy train, or even their future careers.

No political party today will answer to a public that presents mostly an apathetic face. They answer to money; the mana, the rich green plasma that brings them political life. That is the core problem with politics today. It is going to take a lot, a great lot, of shouting from the heartland to bring that down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why exactly...
Posted by: longlivecheney on Sep 19, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
does everyone hate Fox News so much? There are no other conservative networks out there, which is why so many people tune in to Fox. Its called a "free market."

Also, if Rupert Murdoch is the only reason the mainstream media got on board for the war, Democrats might as well give up now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: astudent
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: 4sense
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Because... Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Because... Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Why exactly... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Why exactly... Posted by: longlivecheney
» Faux Newz Is Not Conservative Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Faux Newz Is Not Conservative Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Faux Newz Is Not Conservative Posted by: grammasanity
» RE: Faux Newz Is Not Conservative Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Why exactly... Posted by: Gma1
Here is another way to get control back
Posted by: reason on Sep 19, 2006 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not tell everyone that has different parties to join with the Democrats to ensure a win against the Republicans. Then stay on the Democrats to do the right thing. I mean be as busy as Fox is when they don't like what someone does, especially Clinton.

When Democrats win, we can change laws, put the laws back for press fairness (when we want to) and start being fair in all things to the rest of us. If a Democrat pulls a republican stunt, we know how to scrapegoat them on TV. Fox has taught us how.

Some of those 3rd parties are funded by Republicans, to weaken the Democrat vote. Good democratic leaders could work with the other parties by promising them appointments.

First things first. The most important act is to get rid of the Bush gang.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOX News is not REAL news
Posted by: WILDSTARCHILD on Sep 19, 2006 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Journalists should be unbiased and
fair no matter what thier political leanings.
Debate and opinion are fine as long as
people are told that's what it is.
I watch Fox for a good laugh.
Liberal media? Give me a break!
Our media is more corporate controlled
than ever.Drug companies,car companies,
chemical companies etc,etc,why would
they want to support a "liberal media".
This is a right wing myth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: PAID RIGHT-WING "TROLL" PROPAGANDISTS AT WORK AGAIN!
Posted by: longlivecheney on Sep 19, 2006 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm guessing you're talking about me.

Um...no, I'm not a paid "troll." I'm not an employee of any right-wing propoganda machine. I'm just someone with a different opinion than a lot of people on this website.

I'm actually a college student. I've heard a lot of this stuff on my campus, so its not new to me. But I've never been called a propoganda employee before. I'm saving that one to show to my friends. Classic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He owns MySpace?!
Posted by: Jeanne on Sep 19, 2006 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone better watch out for your children! Rupert Murdoch bought MySpace? Is this true? Is it possible? He must be stopped!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He owns MySpace?! Posted by: Jnutter
Even more cover-ups at the FCC of media ownership concentration
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 19, 2006 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a very interesting article on the current role the FCC is playing in making sure corporate media stays in the hands of Murdoch and the other major media corporations:

FCC Scandal Explodes with Second Revelation of Suppressed Media Ownership Research
by Robert W. McChesney


Who wants to bet that CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC and CBS will devote any time to this story?

Even more unbelievable is the Washington Post's hiring of Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson as an op-ed columnist. Why don't they give Noam Chomsky a column opposite his? That'd make for some interesting and constrasting opinions - come on Washington Post, what are you afraid of? Isn't equal time for opposing viewpoints an American democratic tradition?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AMERICA IS A FASCIST NATION -that's a fact jack
Posted by: Burtonger on Sep 21, 2006 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have you seen the list of characteristics of fascism ?
America covers all the bases including lack of free speech, it's a facade ,free speech in bullshit democratic america. The way elections are run in a third world country,same as I saw personally when visiting at the last two elections in the U.S....Harassment of voters waiting in line to vote,rigged voting machines run by corrupt republicans , it's a real farce. I teased my american friends about getting the U.N. or CANADIANS to monitor the elections like in third world countries,but that was rejected officially by the illegal government . Why ?
IF supposed journalist$ stated their true feeling and findings they'd be out of work/blackballed or shot or put in some secret prison just like NAZI GERMANY or communist russia. American media is so controlled by a few rich assholes it's sickening to read or watch anything , because you know so many americans believe the slanted propaganda.All I have to say is think about KARMA,it's a universal law that lawmakers can not change. KARMA will come to all the deserving,just another fact .THE MACHINE EATS ITSELF

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]