Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Written in the Blood

By Christopher Rabb, ColorLines. Posted September 21, 2006.


In order to learn about my black ancestors, I had to research the white people who owned them.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Christopher Rabb

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In just over two years of DNA testing, I may have become the most genetically well-documented black person to date.

I have cajoled and convinced relatives to assist me in this quest by swabbing the inside of their cheeks in furtherance of the family good. After more than a decade of intensive research in the tradition of our family's elder genealogists going back three generations, I've been able to identify 10 distinct African lineages coursing through my body. I've been able to uncover what for so many descendants of enslaved Africans is a tragically elusive piece of our family history. What I initially thought was a potential means by which government agencies and eugenicists could harvest and misuse people's genetic code, I eventually saw as a powerful tool to delve deeper into the cultural diversity of my African ancestry.

But I quickly realized that the more intently I sought to learn about my black ancestors, the more I would have to research the white people who owned them. A notable subset of the slave owners were also my ancestors. Many white people -- mainstream journalists in particular -- ask me how I used this technology to identify the prominent white ancestors in my pedigree. The answer is, I didn't. It was neither my goal, nor my interest.

While I was growing up, my complexion and features constantly reminded me of this fact, a reality I only came to peace with it when I learned the distinction between ancestry and heritage. Before this epiphany, the idea of white male ancestors who owned and raped my black female ancestors filled me with so much rage and frustration that I nearly lost the will to learn more.

Genes, however, don't tell the whole story. Often, they only illuminate the corners of this planet from which our ancestors hail. The larger narrative is what our forbearers chose to do in those corners and how that, generations later, produced us and the socio-political circumstances into which we were born. Once I drew the line between what I was (my ancestry, which I cannot control) and who I was (the heritage I choose to embrace), whatever I uncovered in my genealogical journey had little impact on my racial identity. And racial identity, not to be confused with race -- the biological term -- is an incendiary and malleable artifice of our own making. What we loosely and provocatively call race, so often conflated with color, culture and consciousness, changes with the passing of each historical moment and each footstep toward or away from those earthly corners from which our ancestors migrated.

When my circuitous research finally revealed the identity of the first slave-owner who was also an ancestor of mine, I cringed, wishing it wasn't so. When that painful experience repeated itself for the second, third, fourth and fifth time, I had to consciously choose to process these genealogical realities in a way that did not psychically relegate me to being a man who descends from multiple rapists. That's when my epiphany came: How can I be ashamed for acts I did not commit? How can I take responsibility for the choices an ancestor -- any ancestor -- made decades, generations or centuries before I was even born? For that matter, how could I take pride in something I had nothing to do with?

I descend from two black parents, four black grandparents, eight black great grandparents and 16 black great-great grandparents. Of my 32 great-great-great grandparents, at least five ancestors were white, slave-owning men who had relations with enslaved Black female forbearers. But for me, Ewondo, Tikar, Bamileke of Cameroon, Mende, Kru and Temne of Sierra Leone and Liberia, Ga of Ghana, Yoruba of Nigeria, Berber of Morocco and Pakistani, are a select sampling of my ancestral ethnicities that have influenced the heritage I own.

When I visited the site of the antebellum Rabb plantation from where my surname comes, I longed to know about my great-great-great grandparents who were kidnapped from points unknown and despaired that it might be impossible to find the names, language, beliefs and even just that small piece of the world they called home. I always knew my ancestors had a place in history. Now, thanks to science, I know where those places are, not just in history, but on a world map and amidst the tangled, blood-drenched, but resilient roots of my ever-expanding family tree.

Digg!

Chris Rabb is a consultant, writer, and genealogist. Rabb's forthcoming book about his family and genealogy is called iRivers to the Souli. Rabb is the Founder and Chief Evangelist of Afro-Netizen and a contributor to Colorlines Magazine. He can be reached via his Website chrisrabb.com. Email him at alternet@chrisrabb.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
sucks
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 21, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter what racial backgrounds any of us have, it must be a shock to learn that we have criminal blood running in our veins caused by some really goofy ancestors. On the other hand, does this really matter? Isn't survival in decency the really important thing now regardless of who are ancestors were? If we can dump our criminal leadership, we can be really proud regardless of all these other situations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sucks Posted by: chrisrabb
Genealogy
Posted by: sisterbluerose on Sep 21, 2006 2:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For every black person sold into slavery there was not only a white crewed slave ship, but usually black people in Africa selling them.
And every owner/slave pairing was not a rape. Sally Hemmings is known to have returned from France where she knew she was free, to continue living with Thomas Jefferson
There is always the posibity that your black grandmothers who had children by slaveowners were the prefered partner, and treated better than the wife. I've certainly read such cases while researching genealogy. After all, according to law only legetimate children could inhert at the time.
At one time the law read heiresses could leave their money to anyone except their illegimate child. And after all, back then only a women could be sure that she was her child's parent.
Race is a social construct. If Humans really were different races, we would not be able to interbreed. That is how biologists tell the difference for other animals.
The Saints say it best. Everybody on the planet is decended from everybody who was alive 400 years ago. So we are all cousins. This happens every 400 years.
The difference is I don't know how closely you and I are related, whereas I know that I'm my own 4th and 12 cousin.
Knowing the race of a person will not tell me if that person will treat me well, only if I know his character.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Genealogy Posted by: ShoShenQ
» TJ and African Slaves Posted by: Ktflake
» Jefferson Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Jefferson Posted by: Robba29
» RE: Genealogy Posted by: anna33
» RE: Genealogy Posted by: YogiBear
keep working that race politics! The plutocrats need a fakeLeft, not a TrueLeft!
Posted by: rebel_pig on Sep 21, 2006 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Race and Gender; Divide and Rule!

Rich people will continue to dominate America as long as race and gender politics is the focus of the Left, as long as our Left is a FakeLeft obsessed with race, gender, sex, religion, environmentalism--anything but populist economics issues like universal healthcare and progressive taxation, which are the foundation of any progressive leftist nation.

And as for your nasty racial politics and your white-guilt, white-hating politics, the 1860 census shows that up to 4-10% of all slave owners were black and Indian, and that only 1.5% of all white Americans owned slaves at all.

THe first legal case that set the precedent for chattel slavery involved a BLACK slaveowner who sued to keep his black slave. He also owned a white slave. The first slaves in America were all white.

Also, 30% of all white Americans have some black ancestry. See more here and here.

But you fake Lefties stay well away from the facts about how 30% of all American whites are part black, and how over half of all white Americans are descended from indentured slaves. Don't you?

How else can you maintain that white-guilt identity politics that diverts America from populist economics and TrueLeftism?

Ya damn traitors!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Racist_pig Posted by: Ktflake
A loving people and some really awful, brutal relatives.
Posted by: greentime on Sep 21, 2006 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I look at Africa as home. Home to us all. I find great comfort in knowing we all can trace ourselves back to common ancestors. I have no problem with this and I am white... whatever that means and to whom.

I am glad that we humans have traversed the globe over the millenia and that we are made up of all the genes and all the colors. We all started in Africa as black, the color that reflects all colors. Color however, was never the point. Color was an ecological and geographical occurance to help us survive varying climates. It has been made the point by our most greedy, fearful and ignorant relatives. It has been used by them to rule and control. To the extent we fall into their spin on the conversation, we extend their power. I am not ignoring history or the impact of thier heinous actions.

What matters is how we are with each other now, today. Every culture has conflict, every family has conflict. I have a friend who has had everything horrible done to her that any of us can imagine. Rape, incest, stabbing, cuts, wounds of the heart and spirit few of us would survive, abuse of every kind. Even her children and grandchildren were taken from her. All this was done to her by her family, mostly by the men in her family and also by some of the women. I can tell you what she has trancended. Everything.

She wakes up everyday, alive, without resentment or hatred. She doesn't hate black people because it was black people who did this to her. She doesn't hate men because most of it was done to her by men. She doesn't hate white people as her father and grandfather tried to teach her to to hate them. She has chosen to still take each person she meets on their own merits.

She made me realize the anger and resentment I held onto about my own family's disfunction was a pointless excercise in staying in their conversation instead of having my own conversation with others.

A lot of emphasis has been placed on genealogy. A lot of black Americans think that white Americans know their lineage. This too is a dangerous false assumption that leaves people with more resentment about the past. I don't KNOW my lineage back more than three generations except by some names or places. I can barely remember my great grandfather. I have a picture of him but don't know what made him laugh or cry. I may know his name, but that doesn't tell me about the quality of person any of my ancestors were.

I'll bet though there were some great human beings and some really sour ones. My grandfather was a racist, my parents transcended most of that. I transcended the rest and became an activist for civil rights. I hate slavery too, and war, and abuse of any kind. I can't stand bullies. I don't care what color anyone is, I care what kind of person they are and how they treat others around them.

The only thing we truly can own is our own minds and hearts and our own choices in each present moment. I wouldn't want to be here without you and I try to be someone you would be glad to be here with.

Meanwhile, family, let's decide to be the kind of sisters and brothers we would like to have. Each time we choose our better behavior, we are on our way to evolving into the knid of ancestors we wish we all had.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Point of Order Posted by: NoPCZone
New Construct
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 21, 2006 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not advocate that people ignore or deny the cultural/ethnic/racial heritage in their background, but I really wish it were not the division line of so much of our political and social discourse. Anyone 2 or 3 generations removed from the 'home country', wherever that happens to be, is, like it or not, more defined by American history and our joint cultural heritage.

America is browning by the day. Anybody who honestly looks at demographics will push most people to a much greater level of cross-racial and cross-ethnic intermarriage and partnering than ever previously seen. Rather than choosing between different cultures and heritages, we should seek to embrace the best of what has been brought into the American culture by people of every type.

If you could be transported to the America of 40 years from now in the blink of an eye you would be astounded by the contrasts. Nobody can predict specifics, but the number of multi-racial children and couples can be easily projected by statistics and demographic analysis. This could be a good or a bad thing.

If people use race, and ethnicity as a dividing line we could descend down a dangerous path to a highly factionalized culture even more deeply divided by race than we have historically been. If, however, we embrace the diversity of backgrounds and the new culture that is the result of all the mixing of cultures, it can be a wonderful thing.

Most any group of people, however divided, have good things and not so good things in their history. It's just a matter of digging deeply enough to find it. The multi-ethnicity and multi-racial character of our future nation should free people to identify themselves as products, participants and heirs of the American Culture. A culture built upon all of the best the world has given us, plus that which has developed here as a result of that rich heritage.

I'm not warning people against knowing their genealogy, just commenting that it should not be the defining aspect of who they are. If you are an American of whatever racial/cultural/ethic background(s) you are my brother or sister. Don't choose to divide us by the artifice of the haters and scapegoaters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black ancestors
Posted by: willymack on Sep 21, 2006 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you accept the premise that Africa is the cradle of humanity, then we ALL have black ancestors. Black is beautiful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Black ancestors Posted by: greentime