Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Sort of Homecoming

By Hazel Rowley, The Nation. Posted September 18, 2006.


At least 12 million people from Africa were loaded into slave ships and transported to the Americas. How do people of African descent see their relationship to their ancestral home?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Hazel Rowley

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

At least 12 million people from Africa were loaded into slave ships and transported to the Americas. How do people of African descent, scattered around the world, see their relationship to their ancestral home? Do they consider themselves "the African diaspora"?

If their African heritage dates back several generations, is it "nebulous atavistic yearnings," as the Harlem Renaissance poet Countee Cullen once said, to search for their roots, to want some kind of bond with their ancestral homeland? Or is it important, in a neocolonial and still-racist world, that Africans and people of African descent see themselves as part of a transnational community?

After all, the ancestors in question did not choose to leave their homeland; they arrived in the Americas in chains, and from the time they landed they were divided and dispersed, as a strategy of domination. And even though slavery has ended, people of African descent still wear its imprint on their skin, like a tattoo. Out of slavery came an ideology of racism that permeates the Western world to this day.

Given the black collective memory of slavery, it is easy to understand the emotional tug of the ancestral land, the longing for Pan-African brotherhood and the desire for a community that is not racist. The trouble is, as these three books all show, Afro-diasporic solidarity is complex, and often fraught.

In Middle Passages James T. Campbell (not to be confused with James Campbell, the Baldwin biographer) looks at various African-American journeys to Africa over the past two centuries. What did Africa mean to them? asks Campbell. What did America mean to them? In the past, the number of African-Americans traveling to Africa remained small. Since the growth of the African tourist industry in the 1990s, tens of thousands of African-American tourists have made pilgrimages there each year, and it often proves a charged emotional experience.

The first story in the book, an astonishing tale of dramatic reversals of fortune worthy of a Grimm fairy tale, reminds us just how ruthless was this trade in "black gold." In 1730 Ayuba Suleiman Diallo, a highborn Muslim man in West Africa, made a 200-mile trek to a place on the Gambia River where an English ship was anchored. He had slaves to sell, but the English captain was not prepared to pay enough, and Ayuba continued south into Mandinke territory. He exchanged his slaves for cattle and set off for home, unaware that he was being followed. He was waylaid. His captors shaved his head and beard.

Back at the English ship on the Gambia, the English captain recognized him but apparently had no qualms about loading him on board as part of his human cargo. Ayuba would find himself working on a tobacco plantation in Maryland. And then came another dramatic reversal of fortune: His noble birth was discovered, and he was put on a ship to England, where he was adopted by the English gentry and met the royal family. After a year there, he boarded another slave ship, this time as a passenger, back to Africa. He spent the rest of his days working for the Royal Africa Company and facilitating the slave trade. "Viewed through the moral lenses of our own time, Ayuba seems guilty of the most appalling hypocrisy," writes Campbell, "but he would not have seemed so to contemporaries."

Langston Hughes was 21 in the summer of 1923, when he boarded a ship in the Brooklyn dockyards heading for West Africa. The 1920s was the Jazz Age, and the time of the black arts movement known as the Harlem Renaissance. As Hughes puts it, "The Negro was in vogue." Caught up in the neo-Romantic "primitivism" was a new fascination with Africa, its tom-tom exoticism, its black vitality. Hughes was as prone to employ these stereotypes as everyone else; the difference was that he was one of the few who actually made the voyage to Africa. Eager to escape the humiliation of racism in America, he hoped to find a truer, freer self in the home of his ancestors. His first sight of the coastline filled him with excitement: "My Africa, Motherland of the Negro peoples!" He would respond viscerally to the beauty of the landscape and the people, but he left Africa feeling rebuffed. Africans treated him like a white man. Years later, in his memoir The Big Sea, he would mock his naïve hopes and illusions.

It is sometimes surprising to see who clings most to the African mystique. W.E.B. Du Bois grew up in New England. At school he was never taught a thing about African history. It was not until he went to Fisk University that he developed an interest in Africa, and in 1907 he embarked on what would become a lifelong project, an Encyclopedia Africana.


Digg!

Hazel Rowley is the author of Richard Wright: The Life and Times and, most recently, Tête-a-Tête: Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
all of us
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 18, 2006 2:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If current theories of migration are correct then all of us, regardless of color, originated in Africa. Our color was created to properly protect us from any excess sun exposure. So racism by color is just plain silly and racist individuals are simply quite brainwashed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The simple truth
Posted by: cinattra on Sep 18, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The simple truth is Black Americans had to stop being African and we are not immigrants.

There is no relationship between Black Americans and Africans. I have thought of traveling to Africa but only to see where we were held before we were shipped off across the Atlantic Ocean. America is where we have forged our identity and culture and I think it will be a stretch to feel anything more for Africa.

I'm not saying it is not possible to forge some bonds to Africa but how honest can those ties be? Africa is made up of many different countries and many different tribes and many different cultures and so which one did my ancestors belong to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The simple (larger) truth Posted by: fredo1012
» RE: The simple (larger) truth Posted by: cinattra
Class as well as race
Posted by: janakiblum on Sep 18, 2006 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the article reveals is the prevalence of class in all societies. It is strange that these thinker-travelers swallowed the myth of a homogenous, primitive indigenous African people. The colonization of a country or the formation of a new nation (eg. USA) does not eliminate previously existing social/class relations. The colonizers then become a "super elite" that manipulates social and racial factors to their own advantage. When visiting or living in former colonies (including the former Eastern Bloc), I found that westernized people in general, regardless of race or ethnicity, are considered "upper class" and rich. And just like in the USA, you are treated differently if you have money, and disregarded if you do not. The socially privileged of any nation are apt to look down on their "inferiors". Incidentally, it is much easier to understand the corporate-friendly, anti-worker domestic policies of the Bush administration when they are framed in terms of a privileged elite maintaining its prerogatives by harnessing and controlling the labor of the rest through regulation and cant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Betrayal of their essential Americanism"
Posted by: BlackStar on Sep 18, 2006 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the US government was highly suspicious of American blacks who showed solidarity with African people and their struggles for independence; it was viewed as disloyal, a betrayal of their essential Americanism.

It's unlikely the US government of the 1920s-30s viewed Pan-Africanism as a betrayal of black people's Americanism. American blacks barely had any rights at all - a clear denial of their very Americanism, so how could they betray a status they were not recognized as having?

Pan-Africanism was more likely to have been perceived as a dangerous threat to the status quo of the time. If the movement had succeed as Garvey intended, it would have been very difficult for black people to remember their place...and stay there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to rethink this
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Sep 19, 2006 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So-called "African-Americans" owe their gene pool to three equal sources: European, West African and Native American. The African source is highly dilluted which is why Africans can easily spot these folks as American.

Time to get on with the future. Black Americans are a new race with a new culture. They should give their so-called "African heritatge" the same attention that Brits give to their possible Celtic heritage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time to rethink this Posted by: israelcd
what about those Pilgrims
Posted by: Pocahontas on Sep 22, 2006 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be great if white people would go back to their homelands.

Unfortunately, I think people around the world hate any and all American regardless of their color or nationality. I think we all would treated indifferently in other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]