Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

War, Murder, Rape... All for Your Cell Phone

By Stan Cox, AlterNet. Posted September 14, 2006.


Everyone's heard about the human rights abuses in African gold and diamond mines. But when it comes to their ultra-cool, razor-thin cell phones, American consumers won't get the message.
091406story
091406story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Stan Cox

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"As you crawl through the tiny hole, using your arms and fingers to scratch, there's not enough space to dig properly and you get badly grazed all over. And then, when you do finally come back out with the cassiterite, the soldiers are waiting to grab it at gunpoint. Which means you have nothing to buy food with. So we're always hungry."

That's how Muhanga Kawaya, a miner in the remote northeastern province of North Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), described his job to reporter Jonathan Miller of Britain's Channel 4 last year. Cassiterite, or tin oxide, is the most important source of the metallic element tin, and the DRC is home to fully one-third of the world's reserves. Some cassiterite miners work on sites operated directly by the country's military or other armed groups. Working in the same area are "artisanal" miners who are theoretically independent, like prospectors in America's Old West. But the cassiterite they extract is heavily taxed by the soldiers -- when it's not just stolen outright.

With a land area as vast as that of Texas, California, Montana, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada and Colorado combined, the DRC has only 300 miles of paved roads. To reach one of the many cassiterite mines in the virtually roadless northeast, 1,000 miles from the national capital Kinshasa, Miller's team followed a 40-mile footpath that, he reported, was as "busy as a motorway. Four thousand porters ply this route carrying sacks of rock heavier than they are. Each of their 50 kilogram packs of cassiterite is worth $400 on the world market. Government soldiers often force porters at gunpoint to carry the rocks free of charge; if they're lucky, though, they can make up to $5 a day." (Watch Channel 4's gripping, award-winning report here.)

So, why should we care? Because without cassiterite rock and the other ores mined in the Congo we would be unable to manufacture the linchpins of our global "weightless economy" -- computers and telephones.

Greener phones, meaner mines

A horrific war among the DRC military and various rebel armies officially ended in 2003 after taking 3 million to 4 million lives. But fighting continued long after that in the northeast, fueled by mining profits. First-ever democratic national elections in July have set up an October runoff election in the DRC, along with great hope for the future. Meanwhile, disarmament and integration of the armies is being carried out. But soldiers frequently receive little or no pay, and that provides a strong incentive for them to squeeze what they can from the cassiterite business.

The majority of the ore moves through illicit channels across the northeastern border to Rwanda, enriching troops and middlemen along the way. The U.K.-based organization Global Witness has comprehensively documented the impact of resource extraction in the DRC in a 2005 report that described "killing, rape, torture, arbitrary arrests, intimidation, mutilation, and the destruction or pillage of private property" that soldiers used "to gain control either over resource-rich areas or over the ability to tax resources."

Since the July elections, says Carina Tertsakian of Global Witness, "labor conditions remain pretty much the same, especially in the informal sector." She says the DRC government now has slightly more control over the mines, "but that's not necessarily for the better." Despite pressure from the United Nations and European Union to pay members of its newly integrated armed forces more consistently, miners are being treated just as they were during the war.

In a cruel irony, Western efforts to make information-age products more environmentally friendly actually boosted incentives for violence and exploitation. In late 2002, the EU joined Japan in banning lead from the solder used in cell phones and other electronic goods. Traditional solder is an amalgam of 63 percent tin and 37 percent lead, but lead-free solder is composed almost 95 percent of tin. Partly in response to that new demand, the world price of tin shot up by almost 150 percent between August 2002 and May 2004, and has remained high since. As prices rose, fighting in the eastern DRC intensified.

Killer coltan

This wasn't the first time that fighters in DRC and Rwanda have reaped a mineral bonanza. Back in 2000, a spike in the price of coltan, an ore that is the source of the precious metal tantalum, spurred feverish mining, profiteering and suffering in the same area of northeast DRC where cassiterite is mined. The DRC controls an estimated 64 to 80 percent of world coltan reserves, and the windfall from mining those deposits funded a Rwanda-backed rebel army of as many as 40,000 soldiers during 2000-2002. The mining was also blamed for destroying habitat of the mountain gorilla; the gorilla population plunged by half in a national park where coltan was being mined.

Global demand for coltan increased with the growing use of tantalum in cell phones and other electronic devices. Whereas cassiterite is needed to make the products more eco-friendly, coltan is needed to make them more compact. Capacitors made with tantalum have an unmatched ability to hold high voltages at very high temperatures. Because of that, tantalum capacitors have been essential to the miniaturization of cell phones and other handheld wireless devices. At the time of the price spike, the No. 1 destination for the DRC's coltan exports was the United States. The prices of tantalum and its coltan ore have fallen from their 2000-2002 peak, but continued heavy demand from the electronics industry will keep their value high.

Getting a signal -- halfway to the moon

There's not much tin, and only a tiny amount of tantalum, in an individual cell phone; however, explosive growth in the wireless market has piled those metals up, milligram by milligram, into countless tons. In 2005, worldwide sales of mobile phones surpassed 200 million per quarter -- that means that factories are churning out 25 phones every second, around the clock. Customers typically discard and replace their phones every 18 months in the United States, and that cycle is said to be down to 12 months in Western Europe.

In the spring of 2001, some analysts were expressing doubts over a seemingly outlandish prediction that 1.7 billion people -- one out of every four on the planet -- would be wireless subscribers by 2006. As it turned out, the planet now has more than 2 billion subscribers, and the industry would like to sell a new phone to as many as of them as possible by the end of 2007.

Two billion of those little phones laid end-to-end would reach almost halfway to the moon. And that doesn't count the vast numbers already buried in landfills or abandoned in desk drawers.

As portable electronics acquire even more innovative features and (somehow) grow even smaller, their manufacture is sure to require even more exotic materials. And, more likely than not, those materials will come from some exotic location. Even before the handheld revolution, the United States was importing more than 70 percent of its tin, nickel, platinum and chromium, and more than 90 percent of its tantalum, aluminum ore, niobium and manganese. The EU and Japan are even more dependent on imports of those minerals, as well as silver, zinc, tungsten, gold, vanadium and copper.

Battery and assault

Cell phones, laptop computers and other portable electronics rely for their power on lithium ion batteries, which aren't just made of lithium. They contain copper and cobalt (often found together in a single ore called heterogenite) as well as nickel and iron, and generally have to be replaced every one to three years. (Up to 6 million will need to be replaced all at once with the recent recall of Dell and Apple laptop batteries). The DRC has 10 percent of the world's copper reserves and 30 to 40 percent of its cobalt, and with the prospect of a stable central government, the country's importance as a source of those materials for batteries and other uses is expected to grow.

The DRC's mines are in its southernmost province, Katanga, which went largely unscathed by the war that raged far to the north. Nevertheless, artisanal miners work under conditions that are only marginally better than those in the tin and coltan mines. They crawl through incredibly hot, cramped tunnels lit only by small flashlights or candles, using only shovels or their bare hands as tools. The BBC reported last year that the Ruashi mine employs 4,000 miners, some as young as 8 years old, who "dig and sieve from dawn to dusk."

Although transnational corporations are now rushing in to exploit the heterogenite deposits on an industrial scale, much of the ore is still being extracted by artisanal miners like those in Ruashi. Global Witness explained the danger in a July 2006 report:

Deaths usually occur when miners are digging holes -- sometimes 20 meters or deeper -- then digging horizontal corridors, known as kalolo or galleries, as they follow the cobalt or copper veins. The kalolo sometimes extend over stretches of more than 50 meters ... Those who remain at the top are usually the first to spot signs of crumbling earth and try to warn their colleagues of the danger -- often too late. As the mineshaft starts collapsing, they may attempt to rescue their colleagues trapped underneath. In some cases they succeed. In other cases, they have themselves been trapped by falling rocks, injured, and even killed in the process of trying to save their teammates.
There is an expectation in Katanga that after the October elections, foreign corporations will move in, putting an end to the more dangerous freelance mining. But the highly mechanized companies will be able to employ only a small fraction of the current artisanal miners, and, says Carina Tertsakian, there are already reports of clashes between corporate security guards and miners reluctant to surrender the sites they've been working.

Scary old phones

The level of exploitation continues to be affected much more by prices on the London Metal Exchange than by international efforts to protect workers or curb illicit trafficking of resources. Tertsakian says, "Organizations and journalists have created greater awareness, but I have to say we haven't seen that awareness translated into action." Even when Western manufacturers attempt to avoid buying Congolese minerals mined under deadly and exploitative conditions, they find it's not easy.

A great amount of the tin, coltan, copper and cobalt move out of the DRC via such roundabout and shadowy routes that it becomes almost impossible for a company at the end of the line to determine their origin. And human-rights-conscious consumers are even deeper in the dark. You can't boycott the assortment of metals in an electronic device the same way you can boycott a "conflict diamond" with a clearer history.

Demand for the minerals could be slashed if customers didn't replace their cell phones as often, and if when they did buy a new one, they no longer treated the old one as disposable. A myriad of for-profit and charitable organizations are now collecting unwanted cell phones for resale, donation or recycling. (Read thelist of those who have taken a pledge of responsibility).

Yet the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) says that currently fewer than 1 percent of retired phones in this country are restored or recycled. With word spreading, that market may increase, and begin to affect the new phone market. As the title of an article in the current issue of Inc. magazine shows, manufacturers are already concerned: "Three Scary Words: 'Buy It Used'."

A 2004 California law requires sellers of cell phones to accept return of the instruments by their customers for reuse or recycling. It was passed in the face of the industry's intense nationwide efforts to defeat such mandatory take-back bills. Nationally, all four top wireless companies -- Cingular, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon -- have voluntary take-back programs; however, a "report card" issued in April by the Washington, D.C.-based environmental group Earthworks gave those programs an F.

Of the stores Earthworks visited, only 30 percent displayed information on drop-off and recycling, and only 50 percent of company representatives provided accurate information on the program. And companies could not verify that they were handling the returned phones according to best environmental and social practices, or that they weren't simply dumping many of them overseas.

Kimberlee Dinn of Earthworks says her group has seen some modest improvements in response to the report card. "There's a little more visibility of programs in the stores, more prominent mention on some of their websites. But not a single company has been able to provide us with statistics showing increased recycling of their phones."

To handle returned phones, all of the big four companies contract with ReCellular, Inc. of Dexter, Mich., which, according to Earthworks, is the only company to have been removed from the Electronics Recycler's Pledge of True Stewardship for noncompliance with its standards.

Dinn says California's mandatory recycling law has been a huge boon to ReCellular, which has grabbed 75 percent of the national market. CNN puts its market share somewhat lower, at 53 percent, and praises ReCellular for selling 55 to 60 percent of its still-functioning phones abroad, largely in poor countries where people can't afford new ones. That keeps waste out of U.S. landfills but also raises a question: If most used phones are being bought by people who would not have bought one otherwise, is reuse really cutting very deeply into demand for minerals, including those mined under conditions of near-slavery?

Tiny treasure trove

Once electronic goods go kaput (as they all eventually do), the metals they contain represent a potential "treasure trove," in the words of USGS. By their calculations, the 500 million phones now lying unused in American homes and businesses contain more than 17 million pounds of copper, 6 million ounces of silver, 600,000 ounces of gold, and 250,000 ounces of palladium.

The tin in the 110 pounds of cassiterite a hauler in Congo carries on his shoulders for 40 miles would make enough tiny drops of tin solder to manufacture tens of thousands of cell phones. The incentive to recycle that tin is boosted, of course, by the presence of precious metals lying next to it in the phone. But each device contains only a few cents' worth of any one metal, even the precious ones. And unlike aluminum cans, which are composed of a single, nearly pure metal, electronic goods don't surrender their diminutive, complex array of metals to the recycler without a struggle.

Among the charges that Earthworks levels at ReCellular has been that it ships nonusable phones to countries where hand labor for disassembly is cheap but environmental and workers' rights abuses are commonplace. Dinn says, "You hear horrible stories from Malaysia, Sudan and other countries -- no protective gear for workers handling the toxic materials in the phones, work being done by prisoners."

But Seth Heine, CEO of the phone recycling firm CollectiveGood in Tucker, Ga., says the metals in nonrepairable cell phones are well worth the costs of collection, shipping and processing, and that it can be done responsibly. Because CollectiveGood is "fixated on following absolutely the most environmentally sound procedures," Heine sends cell phones to an Antwerp, Belgium, company whose standards are "higher than anything in the U.S."

There, 17 different metals, including tin, copper, and cobalt, can be reclaimed. But says Heine, "No company's process at this point can reclaim tantalum. That's frustrating, considering its tragic history in the Congo."

On their backs

Reducing demand for coltan, cassiterite, heterogenite and other ores -- by reusing, recycling, and simply not buying so damn many electronic goods so often -- cannot by itself ensure safe jobs and living wages for people in the Congo or anywhere else. But a seemingly insatiable hunger for mineral resources can and does distort economies in some of the planet's most desperate locales. Relieving some of that distortion through reduced consumption at least gives nations and people a chance to build better lives independent of the ups and downs of world commodity exchanges.

Back in North Kivu last year, Channel 4's Jonathan Miller asked some of the people trudging along that muddy trail if they knew what the burdens they carried would be used for. He reported, "Not one of them knew their cassiterite was destined for the electronics industry in the rich world. One man claimed he knew: 'It goes to America,' he said, 'to rebuild the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.'" I don't know whether Miller told that man the real story -- that within only a year or two, much of the tin in the rocks on his shoulders, having served its purpose in the information economy, would end up lying unused in a dresser drawer or trash heap.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Stan Cox is a plant breeder and writer in Salina, Kan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
tiny
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 14, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried using one of the new tiny cell phones owned by a relative but I couldn't use it because the keys are too tiny for my fingers. I don't even own a cell phone as I hate carrying things around with me that I really don't need. The world is a crazy place with many having too much and even more having too little. Justice for all is so far away that one wonders if the world will ever be just and free from stupid wars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tiny very Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: tiny very Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: tiny very Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: tiny Posted by: ethanay
You forgot to mention...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Sep 14, 2006 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that the miners who mine coltan don't get paid enough and don't get enough food (the mines are in the middle of nowhere) so they eat gorillas. ("bush meat")

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You forgot to mention... Posted by: andrewgirma
How long before the writer gets the message?
Posted by: cso1 on Sep 14, 2006 2:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never owned a mobile phone, but these sorts of outdated and misleading articles make me see red.
The spike in tantalum prices in 2000 was due in large part to accidental triple ordering by the world's two main buyers. This created a push for alternative sources.
Very little tantalum sold at the high prices reached of U.S. $400 plus per pound. The spot price soon collapsed to under $U.S. $15 per pound and has since recovered to the very long term normal average of around $30. The panic ordering of 2000 created a glut from which the tantalum industry is yet to recover.
Most of the world's tantalum has long been supplied by Australia in the form of long term contracts at fixed prices (higher than spot). Most of the supply from Australia has long been provided by Sons of Gwalia - a company which got into such financial strife in the last few years that it was delisted from the Australian stock exchange and one of its two mines partly shut down.
After SGW's collapse, overstocked buyers forced the contracts to be renegotiated to shorter terms on different terms to help get over the glut of tantalum. No other company in the world has managed to start a properly approved tantalum project this century, although several are trying hard, despite the uneconomic prices (tantalum has traditionally been mined as a byproduct as it not normally worth mining by itself - prices are normally too low for its scarcity).
Tantalum is not traded on any recognised metal exchange because the market is too small. It is one of the few commodities whose price has failed to participate properly in the raging bull market in most commodities in the last few years - bull markets in metals such as copper - one of many minerals the Congo has vast reserves of - yet somehow the author of this article would have us believe that new phones with tantalum in them are "the problem".
The best way out of poverty is jobs and trade - not handouts and isolation. "Bush meat" is eaten by starving people - starving people who need jobs to stay alive in the long term - starving people who need to be provided with alternatives to bush meat. The solution is not to ignore the Congo's plight through isolation - the wildlife and people need help.
The world's main tantalum body has a policy which is against any of its members, including American companies, importing tantalum from non-approved sources, of which the Congo is listed as one. To the best of my knowledge, this does not apply for various other Congo commodities such as copper.
If one is going to quote the USGS as a valid source of information for articles, as has been done here, note their figures on tantalum exports from the Congo and surrounding countries - the amounts are tiny compared to the main sources such as Australia. It's simple enough, although time consuming, to verify independently. The amount of tantalum in tantalum containing devices can be matched with direct supply from approved mines and buyers and any left over noted.
I wish conservationists and the like would stop pushing the simplistic nonsense that Congo tantalum is "the" reason the great apes have been threatened and that the best way to fix the problem is to stop buying new mobile phones. It's akin to suggesting that all conservation issues in China are represented by the Giant panda and not buying bamboo will somehow magically fix the underlying problems affecting the wider issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You need some lessons in courtesy
Posted by: mat38 on Sep 14, 2006 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or are you simply, a fool?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Where is danger is double and pleasures are few"-Merle Travis
Posted by: R.I.P. on Sep 14, 2006 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"killing, rape, torture, arbitrary arrests, intimidation, mutilation, and the destruction or pillage of private property" that soldiers used "to gain control either over resource-rich areas or over the ability to tax resources."
Isn't this what our military is doing for the same reasons?
It's only collorateral damage after all - the price OTHER people have to pay for "freedom".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Selling Human Misery
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 14, 2006 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More and more these products are sourced in Communist China (The Worker's Paradise™) where prison labor thrives, worker protections are few and abuse is common.

Combine the sourcing of the rare metals used in the production of such products with the methods and conditions used to make them and you are presented with a moral question:

Do you really want to buy a product that is such a product of human misery?

Back in the days of 'liberalism gone wild' (1960's & 70's) a common slogan among those with a social conscience was 'Live simply so that others may simply live' and I think that me the starting point for many of us in searching for an answer to this quandry.


[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Selling Human Misery Posted by: andrewgirma
So long as they are just black Africans . . .
Posted by: JCR on Sep 14, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was an interesting article to be sure. These "miners" are just the latest victims in our rush to own the latest and greatest. I won't deny that I own a cell phone, but I am still "getting by" on my Nokia bought in 2000. I know, I know - it doesn't have an mp3 player and it doesn't take pictures. It won't connect to the internet and doesn't play streaming video!! It's a total outrage!!! I don't know for the life of me how I survive. By the way, it does still serve its primary purpose - receive and transmit voice calls and even a text message or two! Has anyone noticed that your phones are designed for early technological obsolescence? Have you noticed how many people buy into that crap?

I find it interesting that the EU and Japan set these rigorous environmental standards knowing full well that they will result in greater human exploitation but that doesn't seem to concern them. But then again when has Europe really shown much concern for Africa, other than exploiting it? At least the US doesn't pretend to care about human rights or the environment. At what point do we take into consideration the impact our consumerism, primarily in regards to tech gadgets, has on the environment (including those pesky animals) AND humans?

Oh well, as long as they are black and dying somewhere beyond our immediate vicinity - out of sight really is out of mind . . . I mean when have we ever really given a shit about blacks in Africa, or the US for that matter?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think fast
Posted by: davcrock on Sep 14, 2006 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the fastest growing market for cell phones?

Africa. Interesting, no?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Think fast Posted by: carpee
» RE: Think fast Posted by: talkville
Best we look in our yard before we start pointing fingers!
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Sep 14, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get the distinct impression you'd rather blame China than look in the mirror. WE have set the bad example for the rest of the world by consuming without regard for future generations or for other creatures with whom we should be sharing the planet, and other countries are following suit. Secondly, I believe we STILL have the highest consumption rate per capita on the entire planet. Thirdly, no, never mind, I won't even bother addressing your eloquent use of words; I'm sure some other posters will save me the trouble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The future
Posted by: pzzp on Sep 14, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
will be distingushed by battle for the table scraps of the 21st century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Back to The future Posted by: bornxeyed
worker's rights
Posted by: bouyant on Sep 14, 2006 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for every person on the planet...support your local union. Support unions everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: worker's rights Posted by: polyquat50
» RE: worker's rights Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: worker's rights Posted by: lively56
gates of hell
Posted by: edith on Sep 14, 2006 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
William Blake's poetry and art burn with examples of souls burned in the furnaces of the then new Industrial Revolution.

Between cell phones, cars and jewelry, we put up with exploitation of labor, war, pollution and greedy obsession with consumption for its own sake.

We have created a spiritual hell for ourselves and a labor hell for the workers who crawl thu the Earth for the lifestyle the marketing gurus lure us into.

I am not a religious believer. But if there ever was a Sodom and Gomorrah..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gates of hell Posted by: velvel of atlanta
Who really needs a cell phone?
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 14, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Except fcr the detail, most of this column is not news. The City of Berkeley (I can hear you now!) put something up on their website over a year ago about the costs of disposing of a cell phone. Although I have mentioned this to my boss, my husband, my son... it doesn't make a dent on anyone. Personally I have never needed a cell phone, although it is true there are fewer pay phones these days (that's my husband's excuse). And frankly, I'm really not interested in a) other people's telephone conversations and b) being available to everyone all the time. After reading this, I'm almost positive I will never need a cell phone. As someone else said, let's try to live off the misery of others as little as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"So, why should we care? "
Posted by: AnarchX on Sep 14, 2006 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... I dunno, maybe because people are being oppressed and treated as slaves. Ahhh, capitalism! Money can only be made on the backs of the oppressed.

Remember: these are people too, with mothers, sister, brothers, cousins, like you and yours.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War, murder, rape.......
Posted by: sidewinder on Sep 14, 2006 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does this mean that all you liberal, left-wing pricks are going to give up your cell phones?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: AnarchX
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: AnarchX
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: polyquat50
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: talkville
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: talkville
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: War, murder, rape....... Posted by: talkville
Typical
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Sep 14, 2006 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unintended consequences on those crazy environmental laws. Certainly not the first time the Western countries have helped caused death in Africa in attempts to be "environmentally friendly". When they banned DDT the misquito born illnesses in tropical countries in Africa and Asia has gotten almost out of control. Dipheria, SleepingSickness, Malaria, YellowFever, DenqueFever have killed millions. Well, who cares says the country-club environmentalists. We might have saved some eagles. After all those "africans" have too many babies anyway.

"In a cruel irony, Western efforts to make information-age products more environmentally friendly actually boosted incentives for violence and exploitation."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Typical Posted by: valkyrie
oh the irony
Posted by: bornxeyed on Sep 14, 2006 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of discussing the socio-environmental impact of cell phones on a computer network.

Is the irony really lost on everyone but me that except for the "market" push of ever increasing bandwith and bus speed needed to keep up with streaming video and audio driven websites, all to gobble up that ever increasing market share of hits, to attract more advertisers and their dollars, so that webhosting facilities can offer more bandwidth intensive services to more nodes, we could all still be using 386 computers on a 14.4 modem, i.e. 15 year old computer technology to read the TEXT portion and static images of 99% of the websites out there?

How oftern do you replace your computer just because HP, Dell, Gateway et al offer up another 1GHz of microprocessor, another 50 GBytes of hard drive capacity, another 1mbps of line speed at 1/2 the previous model's cost just so you can email some joke of the day to someone in the next office?

If you think cell phones require precious, rare earth and base metals in abundance just so we can text message our friends with instant real-time streaming video of our new baby spitting up, imagine how much more of those metals are in the very computer you are commenting with right now.

I know, I'm the pot calling the kettle black here, and many of you are using your office computers which are foisted on you by your employer. But I will say, with all honesty, if I wasn't employed as a programmer and expected to keep up with the technology, to a certain extent, in order to work with clients systems and wasn't "filtered out" by websites that made my 28.8 modem on my old 1996 133 MHz NEC notebook choke waiting for high bandwidth websites to load then everything I personally wish to do on the internet could be done with the 1995 486 computer gathering dust in my bedroom.

As for now, I'm sticking to no cell phone, except the one I bought when the phone system was down for 3 months in 2004 because of the hurricanes and I hadn't put a penny of time on in a year and keeping this 3 year old laptop until it totally breaks. Then I'll go back to buying 3 year old used equipment like I did in the past.

I haven't bought a new TV in 16 years nor a new stereo in 30. I've bought a VCR, my first, in 2003 and a DVD player on 2004. I can't say I won't replace them if they break, but abarring Florida power grid problems killing them, with my past record that might not be until 2020.


Not that I think I'm holier than anyone, I just saw the irony, as I said, of indicting cell phones on a computer network that, for all any user knows, might get upgraded every 6 months too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about your plumbing?
Posted by: muymal on Sep 14, 2006 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If tin and copper are the culprits, It seems traditional plumbing and wireing are a greater problem. I know alot of Calif. are using plastic supply line pipe (PEX) , but any plumbing with copper has to use a high tin solder because it has to be lead-free.

It's not as sexy as anti-cell phone rhetoric, but the housing industry has to use tons more tin. (I only have anticdotal proof based upon the amount of tin in my cell phone compared to the plumbing work I need to update from the corroding galv. in my own house).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about your plumbing? Posted by: bornxeyed
Difference (and Distance) make Exploitation Possible
Posted by: lonpine on Sep 14, 2006 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Technology, while making things easier and possible, also gives us myopia and amnesia. How many Americans know what a wheat berry looks like? Or what happens to the styrofoam cups we discard by the millions?

The long arm of unregulated international commerce, aka, "free trade," is indeed far reaching. We are now linked economically everywhere in terms of raw materials (including scrap), energy, final products, capital and labor. When will we be linked... morally, emotionally?

Most Americans would never tolerate allowing a West Virginia coal miner be exposed to 1/10th what these African miners are exposed to- the recent US mining accidents notwithstanding.

What makes it possible for us to be indifferent to these people's suffering in the name of our consumer/commercial empire?

What will it take for us as consumers to demand and expect them to be treated as our miners are in the US?

Someone once wrote that more than a 100 people make a democracy hard to manage. Imagine if we still lived in communities of 100 people in size. Imagine how the whole community would respond if one of us were subjected to these terrible working conditions for the benefit of the other 99.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unfortunately---the clueless
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 14, 2006 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But how do we get past the basic problem: the cluelessness of most Americans about the world OUTSIDE.

For example, I live in rural NE Nebraska. Eighty percent of the people around here wouldn't even know that it is a country, and you would be lucky to find 2 people out of a hundred who could even tell you where it is located.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: unfortunately---the clueless Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar
Some of us and some of us
Posted by: talkville on Sep 15, 2006 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us see fellow humans in the Congo; some of us see land, water and 'resources'. These days, all of us in the USA are obliged to sustain ourselves (and justify ourselves) by emphasis of the latter and super-exploitation of the former. Some of us have referred to this as 'the American Way'. So with the Congo, so with all Africa, the Middle and Far East, Indonesia, Latin America, etc. - everywhere but in the 'land of the free and the home of the brave'. Among others, Mother England organized and developed the state of affairs; we've inherited more than we acknowledge. Some of us are rulers, most of us are not. But text-messaging, high-speed and iPods are just so cool! And so 'affordable', a few pennies a day, less than the price of a Starbucks capuccino. Profit, you see, is where it's at. As Reagan said, 'the business of government is business'; who's got time to think of the unseemly aspects of the free enterprise? Hike up your own bootstraps, there's money to be made!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

old ma
Posted by: Mamarianne on Sep 15, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pile of discarded cell phones is fed by the providers who insist on new phones when customers sign on to new plans. Many cell users would have willingly kept their "old" familiar phones if offered the opportunity and, perhaps, a discount
Along with publishing accounts of the abuse of the workers who mine the raw materials and manufacture these phones, this article provides a link to an agency that recycles. The link to CollectiveGood is well worth the click! Additionally, many communities have local uses for discarded phones, providing them to senior citizens and women in battering situations. Readers should look into this.
Organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch should be supported in their struggle to improve conditions for the laborers who make so many of our modern conveniences possible. Sadly, little is being done to stop the flood of imports of consumer goods made by non-union, low-income, workers who must often endure horrendous conditions. Use those phones to speak up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: old ma Posted by: fervidus
Tell the Cell Phone Industry to Clean Up Its Act
Posted by: goldie'sgirl on Sep 15, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell the wireless industry they need to take more responsibility for recycling their old products in order to decrease these conflicts and the impacts of mining on the environment!

Make your voice heard here and check out www.recyclemycellphone.org for more info.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

subject change.........
Posted by: jonestown kool-aid on Sep 16, 2006 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must digress for a moment here... First of all, the fact that all you folks here seem to be pretty well-informed U.S. citizens is a small miracle in and of itself. I'm almost speechless.

The fact that you're not eating 'cheeze-wiz' straight from the can into your obese, ignorant, liberal or neo-con mouths while watching NASCAR highlights, then chasing it down with cheap, mass produced shit beer is amazing!

You people actually READ! Is there hope? No.

I went to a Roger Waters concert last night and he got heckled and booed when he showed negative images of Dumbya on the screen, of course many of these drunk fools were sitting close to me. Of course.

FOR THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO RECYCLE YOUR PHONES!!!!!!!!!

Even if you 'erase' all of your personal info (texts, phone numbers, any other private info) some hacks out there actually take the time to retrieve ALL of this info. Apparently, erasing the stored info from your phone is not effective, and aside from 'running your phone over with your car' (actually suggested by ''an expert in security") I'm not aware of any other methods used for information disposal. LOOK INTO IT!

At a time in history when privacy is, for all practical purposes, obsolete... one must take additional steps to protect yourself from wonderful things like identity theft, and waste more time 'protecting yourself' from getting fucked by some random stranger...................serenity now....................

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement