COMMENTS: 132
The Undeclared War on America's Middle Class
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
You can't be middle class if you earn the minimum wage in America today.
The American dream and the American reality have collided. In America we have always said that if you work hard and play by the rules, you can take care of yourself and your family. But the minimum wage is just $5.15 per hour. With a 40-hour workweek, that comes to a gross income of $9,888 per year. Nobody can support a family, own a home, buy health insurance, or retire decently on $9,888 per year!
What's more, 30 million Americans -- one in four U.S. workers -- make less than $9 per hour, or just $17,280 a year. That's not a living wage either.
The U.S. Census Bureau's statistics for 2004 show the official poverty rate at 12.7 percent of the population, which put the number of people officially living in poverty in the United States at 37 million. For a family of four, the poverty threshold was listed as $19,307. If the head of that family of four were a single mother working full-time for the government-mandated minimum wage, she couldn't even rise above the government's own definition of poverty.
Becoming middle class in America today is like scaling a cliff. Most middle-class Americans are clinging to the edge with their fingernails, trying not to fall. In the 1950s middle-class families could live comfortably if just one parent worked. Today more than 60 percent of mothers with children under six are in the work force. Not only do both parents work but often at least one of those parents works two or more jobs.
Middle class at 80 hours per week
In a 2005 article in the Chicago Tribune, reporters Stephen Franklin and Barbara Rose introduce us to Muyiwa Jaiyeola. Jaiyeola, who is 33 years old, works a 40-hour week as a salesman at a Sears store, then works another 20 hours in the stockroom of a Gap store in downtown Chicago. When Jaiyeola pulled two all-night shifts at his stockroom job in late August, he was able to sleep only two hours in the afternoon, then two more in the morning before going back to his sales job. He hoped to nap during his break in the middle of the night.
Jaiyeola is not hoping to get rich -- he's just trying to pay his bills. Working two jobs at this wage level is what it takes to be middle class these days. And he's not alone. According to Franklin and Rose:
Nearly 7.6 million Americans straddle two or more jobs and must find time to work, sleep and live somewhat contorted lives in a very full 24 hours. According to a 2001 U.S. Labor Department survey, most workplace moonlighters do it because they want or need extra money to pay bills ...Those who specifically need the extra work to pay bills are most often women who take care of their families, and divorced, widowed or separated workers. For a quarter of the American work force, not only is the American dream not a reality, no part of it is.
Low wages are being paid not only to entry-level workers at places like Wal-Mart and McDonald's but also to adults like Jaiyeola who have work experience. The people being forced to work two jobs to make a living are the heartbeat of our society. They are child-care workers and nursing home workers, janitors and security guards, salespeople and stockers. They often have the most hazardous jobs, the late-night jobs -- the jobs that rarely include benefits.
Americans have traditionally believed in an economy where those who make a contribution are rewarded. A man like Jaiyeola should be able to work eight hours at Sears and then go home.
Low prices, low paycheck
Cons argue that we have to choose between having high wages and having low prices. They are wrong.
Take the case of Wal-Mart. According to the United Food and Commercial Workers union (UFCW), Wal-Mart could pay each employee a dollar more per hour if the company increased its prices by a half penny per dollar. For example, a $2 pair of socks would then cost $2.01. This minimal increase would add up to $1,800 annually for each employee.
I wouldn't mind paying more for a pair of socks if it meant that my fellow Americans would be able to pay for good health care. That would save me money because right now Wal-Mart's uninsured employees run up hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills at emergency treatment centers when their problems often could have been solved more cheaply and with better results had they been caught earlier at a doctor's office.
And I wouldn't mind paying one cent more for a pair of socks if it meant that parents could be home at night and on the weekends spending quality time with their kids. That's a real family value.
Here's what all this talk about wages really comes down to: Would you rather pay 10 percent more at Wal-Mart and get 30 percent more in your paycheck, or would you rather have lower prices and an even lower paycheck? That's the real choice: We're either spiraling up into a strong middle class, or we're spiraling down toward serfdom.
Looking at the arc of U.S. history, we discover we've been on a downward spiral ever since Ronald Reagan declared war on working people in 1981. Companies cut prices and then cut wages so they can still turn a hefty profit. Folks whose wages have been cut can't afford to shop at midrange stores like Macy's, so they have to buy at "low-wage" discount stores like Wal-Mart. That drives more midrange stores out of business and increases pressure on discount stores to send their prices even lower. To compensate for lower prices, they lower wages so they can still turn a hefty profit. On and on it goes -- until the people working those jobs are no longer middle class and have to work two or three jobs to survive.
Our choice is not between low prices at Wal-Mart and high prices at Wal-Mart. It's between low prices at Wal-Mart with lousy paychecks and no protection for labor, and the prices Wal-Mart had when Sam Walton ran the company and nearly everything was made in the United States and people had good union jobs and decent paychecks.
The choice is ultimately about whether we want to have a middle class in this country.
Why unions?
Unless you are a CEO, you don't have a lot of leverage to demand benefits at your workplace. Every year or two, you might go to your boss and ask for a raise or an extra day of vacation, but usually you can't do much about what hours you work, what health benefits you receive, or how your retirement benefits are structured. Unions give workers that leverage.
Unions are designed to give workers a voice in decisions that affect their jobs. They allow workers to negotiate with their employers for wages, health benefits, retirement benefits, and good working conditions. In the best circumstances, unions partner with companies -- both have an interest in satisfied, happy workers.
Unions create a middle class by allowing you and me to ask for the wages and the benefits we need to become or remain middle class. Unionized workers earn higher wages, have better benefits, enjoy greater job stability, and work in a safer environment. In 2003 union workers earned an average of 27 percent more than nonunionized workers. Seventy-three percent of union workers received medical benefits compared with just 51 percent of nonunion workers.
And 79 percent of union workers have pension plans. Cons have slandered unions for more than a hundred years. Professional people have bought the line that it is unprofessional to be in a union, that only blue-collar workers unionize. People worried about their status and legitimacy -- like nurses -- tend not to join unions.
But it's not true that unions are just for blue-collar workers. Unions are for anyone who wants to be middle class. Teachers are almost all unionized. Actors -- most of whom are not Sean Penn or Charlize Theron and don't get paid big bucks -- are almost all unionized. Anyone who works needs the rights that unions can provide.
Democracy in the workplace
Most of us don't think about workplace rights. We assume that because we live in America, we have all the rights we need.
There are no constitutional protections in the workplace. Most people are at-will employees, which means they can be hired or fired at will. Federal law protects you from being fired because of race, age, gender, or disability, but it doesn't protect you from being fired for saying that the boss is overworking you or the company's actions are immoral. You can't say that sort of thing in the workplace because the workplace is not a democracy.
Why does that matter?
If you can't talk freely about your working conditions, you can't negotiate changes to those conditions. If you're afraid the boss will fire you if you complain about overtime, you have no way to prevent your boss from requiring you to work extra hours.
We have a democracy in this country because the founders realized that they could not change the king of England's lousy taxation system unless they had representation in government. Democracy gives us the power to create a society that matches our needs. Democracy in the workplace allows us to negotiate the conditions of our work. It ensures that honest working people like Muyiwa Jaiyeola can be middle class without having to work 60 hours per week.
According to Thea M. Lee, assistant director of public policy for the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), for there to be democracy in the workplace, workers must have fundamental rights. These rights include freedom of association -- which means the right to organize and bargain collectively -- and prohibitions on child labor, forced labor and discrimination in employment.
You may think that we have all of these rights now. We don't. U.S. workers have almost no right to organize. Every 23 minutes in the United States, a worker is either fired or harassed for trying to unionize. Our president goes around the world, talking about the importance of bringing democracy. We loved Lech Walesa and his union movement in Poland. But today, if the middle class is to survive, we need a Lech Walesa in the United States -- or at least some honest education about our own country's labor history.
Labor in America
Labor goes back a long way in U.S. history. In 1874 unemployed workers were demonstrating in New York City's Tompkins Square Park. Riot police moved in and began beating men, women and children with billy clubs, leaving hundreds of casualties in their wake. The police commissioner said: "It was the most glorious sight I ever saw."
Three years later, on June 18, 1877, ten coal-mining activists were hanged. That same year a general strike in Chicago -- called the Battle of the Viaduct -- halted the movement of U.S. railroads across the states. Federal troops were called up, and they killed 30 workers and wounded more than a hundred. In September 1882, 30,000 workers marched in the first-ever Labor Day in New York history. In 1884 the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions was established, and it passed a resolution stating that eight hours should constitute a legal day's work. Hundreds of thousands of American workers began following that rule.
In May 1, 1886, the Knights of Labor took to the streets to call for an eight-hour day. Eighty thousand workers shut down the city of Chicago. On May 4, 3,000 workers gathered in Haymarket Square. A bomb was thrown that killed seven policemen. Eight of the people present were rounded up, tried for murder, and sentenced to death. The Haymarket riot became the symbol of labor injustice in America.
This is but a fragment of the history of the labor movement in the United States.
Matters improved when labor got organized -- but not much. In fact, by the 1920s things looked a lot like they do today: The robber barons were in charge, and the situation for working people was bleak. The rich were incredibly rich, and the few middle-class workers were deeply in debt. The labor movement appeared virtually dead.
It took the Republican Great Depression to wake people up. It took Franklin D. Roosevelt to speak the truth. If a politician said the same things today that Roosevelt did in the 1930s -- openly accusing big business of being anti-American and antiworker -- he'd be accused of socialism and communism. Very few national figures have the courage to speak out today the way FDR did back then.
Roosevelt provided courageous leadership. In his first term, he had sent to Congress the National Industrial Recovery Act, which set standards for wages and working hours and established the right of laborers to organize. This set the stage for labor groups to bargain for wages and conditions. Thanks in large part to FDR's work on behalf of labor, in the 25 years after World War II the real incomes of the middle class doubled.
Why we need a labor movement today
Today America is regressing. Middle-class income has stopped growing. The net worth of those who earn less than $150,000 per year (which includes everybody from the working poor to the highest end of the most well-off of the middle class) is down by 0.6 percent.
The problem isn't the economy. Corporations are making more money than ever. The real income of people whose net worth exceeds $100 million is doubling.
What's happening is simple: The rich are getting richer and the entire spectrum of the middle class is disappearing.
We can easily trace this decline to Reagan's first public declaration of war on the middle class when he went after the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) in 1981. He broke the back of the air-traffic controllers' union and began the practice of using the Department of Labor -- traditionally the ally of workers -- against organized labor and working people.
Reagan liked to say he was against "big government." What he really meant was that he was against Roosevelt's New Deal. He was against Social Security, the minimum wage, free college education (he ended that in California as its governor), and programs like the WPA. He believed in the discredited concept of "trickle-down" economics -- the theory that if you create a corporatocracy, the rich will nobly spend some of their money to help the rest of us. The American people don't need handouts. Our workers just want to be paid a living wage for a fair day's work. We can't count on the corporatocracy to give us what we earn, so we need a strong labor movement to give us the power to negotiate our wages and benefits. Ultimately, it's all about power.
Workplaces are not democracies -- in the United States they're run more like kingdoms. Employers have the power to hire and fire, to raise or lower wages, to change working conditions and job responsibilities, and to change hours and times and places. Workers have only the power to work or to not work (known as a strike). The strike -- a tool that can effectively be used only by organized labor -- is the only means by which workers can address the extreme imbalance of power in the workplace. And because organized labor is a democracy -- leadership is elected and strike decisions and contracts are voted on -- unions bring more democracy to America. We spend about half our waking lives at work -- at least we can have some democracy in the workplace, and a democracy means a strong middle class. ...
To-do list
The cons have almost succeeded in throttling American democracy by screwing over the middle class. To fight back we must battle on two fronts.
First, we must recognize and reclaim the government programs that create a middle class:
- Return to the American people our ownership of the military, the prison system, and the ballot box.
- Fight for free and public education that encourages critical thinking, historical knowledge, and a love of learning in each child. Combat the No Child Left Behind Act and the belief that education is a commodity that can be tested.
- Fight for a national single-payer health-care system based on Medicare.
- Fight for Social Security -- do not let it be privatized or co-opted.
- Fight for progressive taxation: reinstate a rate of 35 percent on corporations and a rate of 70 percent on the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans -- and use the money to pay back the Social Security system and to fund an economic investment program.
- Fight for a living wage and for the right of labor to organize.
- Fight for a national energy program that puts people and the planet -- not Big Oil -- first.
When America has a strong middle class, democracy will follow. The opposite is also true. To fight back, we must also make use of the ballot box. We can achieve the economic programs that make the middle class possible by using the power of our democracy to vote for those politicians who support the middle class. We've been conned for long enough. It's time to take back America.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TT2 on Sep 6, 2006 12:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: World Economy and Slave Wages
Posted by: freerain
» Mob rule beats tyrannical rule
Posted by: YogiBear
» what, read the title and hit reply?
Posted by: halophoenix
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 6, 2006 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people in the south who thought it was O.K. to undercut unions in the north screamed when the jobs started leaving the south for Mexico and elsewhere. The south cut a deal with the devil when they actively sought out industrial jobs with lax rules and no unions. They got pollution, a crappy tax base and a huge working poor population for a couple of decades and now have little to show for it.
Friends, America is a family and it's time we started acting like it. Until these 'Freewill Employment' and 'Right To Work' laws are struck from the books unions will not gain much traction outside of government and service jobs. Manufacturing will continue to hollow out and leave our country until we replace or repeal a whole list of treaties and trade agreements designed to export US jobs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: TT2
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: lively56
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: kww355
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 6, 2006 1:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: left out
Posted by: kww355
» RE: left out
Posted by: Patrissimo
» RE: left out
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: left out
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: left out
Posted by: Madam Hatter
» RE: left out
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ahmlco on Sep 6, 2006 1:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, for example, at the state of the automotive and airline industries. US automakers are bleeding cash (mostly due to once again zigging when they should have been zagging).
Be that as it may, many unions continued to demand an ever larger share of an ever-dwindling pie, with little to no thought as to the future consequences of their actions. But hey, at least today they can go back to their membership and say, "Look what we got you for your dues."
Yeah, plants closed when they're no longer competitive. Layoffs. Bankruptcies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: hms2004
» Unions are their own enemy!
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: lively56
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side...uinons vs. bad corporate decisions
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: yesman
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: magistre
» A non-union story
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 3:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way to get the power is to use the strategy of the labor unions. Make demands with an "or else".
The Lincoln Initiative is a a simple strategy. Each member tells the campaign commitees of both parties the issue that he/she wants in their platforms. The "or else" is that he/she tells them that he/she won't vote for a party that doesn't include that issue in their platform.
The working class has been divided by fear. The Republicans scare the religious right with "sinful wild-eyed liberals" and the Democrats scare the liberals with the "intolerant radical religious right. Each group votes for the "lesser evil" party.
Both parties need our votes. Now's the time to make them compete for them on issues important to the working class.
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The working class and the unions can regain power.
Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: The working class and the unions can regain power.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: profmarcus on Sep 6, 2006 3:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, yes, I DO take it personally
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: agapegirl
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: yesman
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Sep 6, 2006 4:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for Reagan he certainly began the process. I was in California when he became governor and we had never witnessed such an inhumane elected offical like that before. Among other mentioned acts he closed all the State Hospitals creating what we now call the "homeless." For all his acting skills he was a heartless man whose true alooftness reflected his personal view that the masses were a "lesser" population to be used for the benefit of those more "superior." It continues today.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who Now Makes What You Buy
Posted by: hms2004
» RE: Who Now Makes What You Buy
Posted by: ALANHESTER
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ozlock on Sep 6, 2006 4:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In May 1, 1886, the Knights of Labor took to the streets to call for an eight-hour day. Eighty thousand workers shut down the city of Chicago. On May 4, 3,000 workers gathered in Haymarket Square. A bomb was thrown that killed seven policemen. Eight of the people present were rounded up, tried for murder, and sentenced to death. The Haymarket riot became the symbol of labor injustice in America."
Although not a scholar, I don't even think that all the defendants were present at the gathering. Moreover, not all defendants were sentenced to death.
Four were hanged. One committed suicide in jail, Governor Ogelsby commutted two sentences to life, and one had received a 15 year sentence. Governor Altgeld pardoned the survivors in a brilliant summation of the illegal actions of the prosecutors and the judge.
See http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/prisoner.htm
The Haymarket affair gave rise to May Day commemorations around the world. It has never been accepted by the U.S. government as such, partly due to the fact that it had been a big day for Russia, the Soviet Union and other Socialist governments.
My only hope is that people who jump on the Haymarket bandwagon would at least get the facts straight.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ozlock
Posted by: oneyedjack
» RE: ozlock
Posted by: drmflorida
» Roosevelt succeeded because socialism was growing rampantly. The class to which he was a traitor...
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 4:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To vote the politicians out
We’d still be ruled by sleazy smarties
Who give money to both parties
Here’s the truth without a doubt
No one can vote those rascals out!
It does no good to rant and holler
Can’t outvote that mighty dollar
People that our votes elected
Work for dollars they’ve collected
We can only take the reins
If we finance all campaigns!!
The candidates are not to blame
They play in a losing game
They can’t do good if they’re not in
But need both cash and votes to win
Our horse sense points to just one course
Cash and votes from just one source!!!
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Taxation without representation
Posted by: tashi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kww355 on Sep 6, 2006 5:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country would be a lot better off if we could mend both of these broken systems.
A strong national presence of unions even helps people who work in non-union places. Employers are forced to raise the wages and benefits offered ( perhaps not to the level of union workers, but still above the minimums ) in order to keep the good workers they have. A rising tide raises all boats.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good point.
Posted by: jreinhart1
» RE: Unions are a 'check and balance'
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 5:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: malcolmartin on Sep 6, 2006 6:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad truth is that the petty bourgeois cannot defeat the capitalist ruling class! They are a timid and passive group who, in this time for warriors, gather at the gates of the palace to nag and complain essentially to each other. There are scores of Internet websites, magazines, newspapers, radio programs and networks like AirAmerica Radio, and some small television networks where liberal, left, progressive, and other commentators show up to whine out loud. They rail against the outrages and inhumanity of the U.S. government and the Bush Administration. They point out the duplicity, the corruption, the hypocrisy, the inhumanity, and the utter criminality loosed in the world today but to no useful end since capitalism will not be reformed nor shamed to death. Pointing out the defects of capitalism has become as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. The ruling class brushes its liberal democratic critics off like gnats as long as they stay away from the third rail. But let one of these voices dare mention unity based on working class-consciousness and a mobilization to strike at profits and great danger would shortly thereafter visit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: daw13
» Reply to daw13
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: eply to daw13
Posted by: daw13
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: Gatsby
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: vangogh69
» Reply to Gatsby
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: yesman
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnnyM on Sep 6, 2006 6:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just that most of the modern slaves, who are willing to work 80 hours per work and think us that refuse are 'losers,' are just that...willing slaves. It's the slave master whipping the other slaves into the 80 hours of work, only now most are willing.
Whoever above said there's another factor involved here, it's consumerism, is right. To combat this problem, the best way is stop buying! Bring our economy to it's knees!! It's the only way to revolt now, since mass rallies, unions and the press have all lost their effectiveness.
* Walk or ride your bike everywhere.
* Find the natural remedies to your minor illnesses.
* Buy your food from local small farmers, if they exist
* Don't buy that new gadget, you really don't need it
* etc, etc
To fight the system within the system (i.e. with politics and law) doesn't work anymore. So the democrats are useless too - We, the people, have to change the rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: loril
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery; HATS OFF to loril!!
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: yesman
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: yesman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sln70 on Sep 6, 2006 6:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT...
Why?
What could be the reasoning behind this madness? Sure, they want poor workers to exploit, it is their wet dream. But do they not also necessarily need people to buy the products that they produce?
Henry Ford was smart enough to see that he had to pay his workers enough to afford them one of his vehicles. Where has that mentality gone, and do "they" not see how shortsighted it is to impoverish EVERYONE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» why??
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Whenever these discussions come up, I get confused
Posted by: jwg
» It only makes sense if you don't count certain people
Posted by: misterpunch
» RE: It only makes sense if you don't count certain people
Posted by: yesman
» I hear you both and totally agree.. but I'm still confused
Posted by: sln70
» RE: I hear you both and totally agree.. but I'm still confused
Posted by: yesman
» Why? Most CEOs are no smarter than anyone else.
Posted by: McJulie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 6, 2006 6:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that this war is "undeclared" is just total nonsense. Many saw this coming 30 and 40+ years ago. Get the people dumbed down, use debt as a smokescreen to allow people to think they're doing alright. Then pull the rug out from under them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Sep 6, 2006 7:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's Human Nature...
Posted by: agapegirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rtdrury on Sep 6, 2006 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of retail corporations we need small local merchants. Instead of industrial corporations we need small local craftsmen. Instead of factory farms we need small local farms. Instead of giant electric power plants and grids, fossil gas, municiple water works, sewage and landfull waste disposal, and fossil transport fuel networks, we need small-time local electric/thermal cogeneration and biofuel production, water wells, composting and recycling.
Efficiencies of scale is a myth. Efficiencies peak at a very small scale enterprise. And that's a good thing for people because people need to work for themselves, not for the boss man.
While a giant retail or industrial enterprise appears to benefit society by forcing better prices from suppliers, much of these savings feed verious white-collar fluff industry - expensive advertising/marketing, "public relations", lobbying, legal, accounting, executive pay, perks, political donations, philanthropy, and more. Thus efficiencies peak with a smaller enterprise that omits all these extraneous expenditures.
Smaller enterprises mean more independence for more people so more people take on more responsibility in the civic arena. A larger pool of people involved in civic decisions is more effective at filtering out ideological extremism and replacing it with common sense policies in the public interest.
Centralized bureaucracies are less flexible. They encourage one-size-fits all solutions with the appearance of efficiency but which don't utilize local expertise particularly in agriculture. Also, more enterprises means more experimentation and trials undertaken. Nature succeeds with redundancy and diversity. We can benefit with more of that, especially if we can communicate results.
Smaller software enterprises have proven to be much more cooperative in building open stansdards for interoperability and platform independence.
Smaller enterprises tend to avoid violating the sovereignty of the consumer in the market and the sovereignty of the people in civic affairs. Smaller enterprises tend to avoid manipulating the public discourse and debates, perceptions and policy. Smaller enterprises tend to play by the rules instead of trying to set the rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yesman
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yesman
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: mobile68
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: haddit on Sep 6, 2006 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was forced to leave the workforce early because of stress. The "open door" policy was simply a name with no basis in fact, and employers and their pets are aware that harrassment is the first step in getting rid of someone who "doesn't fit". If that fails, the laws back them up to terminate for no cause.
My main jobs were sent overseas. The last one I had was in a company which downsized, and I was one of those left to do twice the amount of work.
When I was younger, work was my release, my pride. The last few years of my working life involved overwork, verbal abuse, intimidation and, on one job, if I even stood up to head to the restroom, I had three supervisors arrive to find out why I was standing up!
My son is going through the same thing now but, luckily, is young, is very good in the profession he loves, and has learned to stand up for himself. But, still, there is no insurance, no paid vacation, and must pay $200/week in gas to get between his home and his jobsite.
As for me, I am now living on less than half of what I used to make, and was forced to move from a my 3-bedroom home into a studio apartment, all I could afford in my new life.
But I've been put in a position to see some who have really been shattered by this economy. Every time I hear Bush talk about this booming economy, I want to scream -- but I can't afford to lose my home for a noise violation!
The bottom line is we need to bring our jobs back to the US, and we need to return to an atmosphere of pride and mutual respect in the workplace. Until we do that, students will continue to drop out of school, seeing no future for themselves or families.
We're in a sorry, sorry situation in this country. I want better for my grandchildren. We should all stand up and demand better. When Bush talks about how great things are, we should bombard him with letters from real people. I can think of something else, too, but that could get me arrested!
Wel need to stand up for ourselves, because our government has enough money that it has been able to buy dark glasses that cut off their view from the real world.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This country is a mere shadow of its formal self, and it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda!
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: This country is a mere shadow of its formal self, and it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda!
Posted by: dougo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bigart on Sep 6, 2006 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 64 lobbyists PER USA Congressperson, thus those with the most money, are able to buy 'democracy'
The most revolutionary minded of all the founding fathers was the radical writer, Tom Paine. With flaming hopes, a vision of a new world and compelled by the spirit and determination of its people to resist British occupation, Paine devoted himself to the American cause. He began with a forty page pamphlet, "Common Sense" which emboldened the settlers to become compatriots and rise up in rebellion. His words formed a nation where democracy is still being defined.
"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine
William Blake penned, "Imagination is evidence of the Divine" and Tom Paine imagined, "We have it in our power to begin the world again." Paine's imaginary democratic government would guarantee freedom to all, and above all else freedom of conscience and worship -which required keeping the church out of state affairs. It was in that spirit that he wrote about Independence Day:
"Let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the Word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know...that in America THE LAW IS KING."
"...a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine
On with THAT Revolution!
public service message from the
.org
WeAreWideAwake
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We the People and Reality
Posted by: yesman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 6, 2006 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the progressive movement would focus more on these sort of things rather than gender/race/global warming/ back-to-nature-movements/etc., they would recapture alot of the power and influence that created the early reforms mentioned in the article.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
~George W. Bush
Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official...
~Theodore Roosevelt
The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people.
~Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault.
~Major Ralph Peters, US Military
DO SOMETHING
~eileen fleming
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Sep 6, 2006 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Sep 6, 2006 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earlier today, I wrote to you and Laura Barcella on “The Slow Death of the Middle Class.” I think your discussion there and here is extremely essential. I believe the need for unions is also significant one. I will submit my previous comment here, though I will add an additional missive to the reading list.
A month or more ago I wrote an exposé on the subject of unions and their recent demise. I cited the campaign to eliminate them further. I invite you to review and comment on,
• “The Center for Union Facts” Fuels Fiction ©.
I greatly appreciate this assessment. I think this discussion is infinitely important. However, I believe talk of the classes and the masses is often too narrow.
I experience that Economists look at policies and practices and not at the pervasive philosophy that lies beneath these. While I think it is true, after the Depression and World War II gains among the average Joe and Joann were made, the poorer began to prosper and the middle class became more settled and secure, I believe the truly rich never allowed for an authentic advancement.
Now, that the Bush Dynasty is solidly in place, the plan is firmer. Bush and his corporate cohorts have advanced strategies that secure their status in society. They have also made certain that all others know their station.
I surmise that there are the elite and those that serve them. Some within the service branch are given greater privileges. Therefore, they feel comfortable, even independent. Yet, in a nation where only the top one percent of the population is doing better I think the middle class has virtually vanished. It won’t be long now.
I invite you to read two treatises that I recently authored.
• "Income Inequity. The Real Reason the Rich Get Richer. ©"
• "Death Tax Keeps The Wealthy Rich. With Increased Wages, Poor Lose ©"
It is only the giving that makes us what [who] we are. - Ian Anderson. Jethro Tull . . . Betsy
Betsy L. Angert Be-Think
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Undeclared, Unions, and Middle Class
Posted by: Conservasaurus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: y_hat on Sep 6, 2006 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Raise the national tax up to 40% for the upper income brackets but once it head north of 50%, I can assure you that the incentive to work in a higher paid professional career *in* *america* will drop. While I can't speak for doctors and lawyers, I can say that top scientists and engineers in america (with masters or phd) will start looking to other countries to do their work, particularly if they are a two-income family, and it is common these days for higher-end scientists and engineers (including software engineering) to have a partner with the same career. This just sounds like a way for ending any desire to do innovative work in the US.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70% - your calculations are incorrect
Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70% - Investor class invited to join
Posted by: Uncle Crabby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 6, 2006 11:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WOW!
Posted by: Aim
» RE: WOW!
Posted by: Tom Degan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: J-Bonnes on Sep 6, 2006 12:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: J-Bonnes, Good post! I would suggest using
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: J-Bonnes: Very interesting site. With all that is
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: J-Bonnes. OOPS! I doubled up the post.
Posted by: SamFox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mom'z the word on Sep 6, 2006 12:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We would have to go back and change some fundamental errors made at the offset by our founders before we can even hope to change the direction we are now heading towards which is a 2 class society upper and lower. It is impossible to promote one class without exploiting another. If the middle class regains its status it must happen at whose expense? The middle class originally existed at the expense of the lower class. As we became a nation of every man for himself, Reagan legacy, no one seemed too concerned with the hardships endured by the lower class. Their situation was of no importance to the majority and ruling middle class and this sealed their fate. In order for a middle class to exist, someone has to be on the bottom, and on top, that’s is what class is all about. Is this really what we want?
Because we started out with slaves it was only natural that once the slaves gained status someone had to take their place in a society built on slavery. What we are seeing today is the natural progression of that slave mentality taking the next step. The middle class has taken its rightful place as the slave class in order for the upper class to secure its place on top. The middle class was o.k. with doing this to the lower class so none of this should come as a surprise.
A corporation as an individual with all the rights and protections of a citizen of the United States has taken the upper class position. It gained status with the Rockefellers, Carnegie, and just got worst. If you want class this is what happens. Class as in fictitious person, definition of a corporation, is diametrically opposed to the whole entire concept of a country owned and operated by the people for the people and of the people.
Unless we can all agree on what makes a democracy it stands to reason that we can never achieve that which is unknown to us.
What it would take to turn this country around and put us all on equal footing is a selfless act establishing once and for all Equal Justice for all. Our Bill of Rights guarentees Equal Justice for all. But the Bill of Rights is not a Law and therefore has no legal standing in any state in the U.S. This means no one is automatically entitled to free speech, equal protection, due process, etc as a citizen living within a state in the United States, which is everyone. To get your rights you have to go to court and beg for them. Rights are not inalienable if they are not the Law. That is why citizens do not have any rights as workers. Make the Bill of Rights a Law and all that changes. Citizens are now automatically recognized as persons with rights because it is Law. Bonus is corporations now have no legal standing in the eyes of the law because they are not a real person. This pretty much wipes out the upper class per se. Forcing Congress to vote the Bill of Rights into a Law would be the single most revolutionary act of our history. And no body died in the process.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A revolution in the works: mom'z the word give us a lot to
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: A revolution in the works
Posted by: mobile68
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jende on Sep 6, 2006 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Power of the People
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gregor on Sep 6, 2006 4:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way to beat the corporations at their own game is not to feed into the game. Then who is in control? Get out of the mindset of "have to's" and get into the mind set of "totally free to do whatever." YOU RULE!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: traynor on Sep 6, 2006 5:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Sep 6, 2006 5:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ocean tides on Sep 7, 2006 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's worked throughout history, and it has been making inroads during these past six years. Tactics differ but the idea is blatantly classic.
It's up to all of us as voters to see through this most extraordinary means of power and control over everyones' lives. The shear incidiousness of these ways and means of pulling the wool over people's (read 'sheep's') eyes has got to stop lest we wind up continuing to settle for crumbs off the table as those in power consume their silkened cakes at everyone's expense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Sep 7, 2006 12:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hartmann's got the domestic platform for the Democrats!
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Franco33 on Sep 7, 2006 8:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to reality.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sorry America, what makes you think you're so special?
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: calibandita on Sep 8, 2006 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, "The Meek Shale Inherit The Earth", not the people who step on those who are less fortunate and use them up 'till they drop!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Geni on Sep 9, 2006 6:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1129-26.htm
However, we really need not only honest vote counting but also some sort of proportional representatio.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NeoCogito on Sep 10, 2006 10:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody knows Republicans have always been conservative and long identified with elitism & platforms that hurt the people. So here comes Clintonomics with the cynical term "Neo-Con," NEW conservatives, confident the people won't figure out the *NEW conservatives could only be the elitist Clinton-Zealots, who nullified our party in the 90's. They say we're dumb and vote against ourselves, what they won't tell us is the fake news, finessing and all the pains they take to keep us that way. Time to quit recreational debate and disssociate ourselves from Clintonomics. To call the president, who institutionalized the most significant collection of right wing reforms in modern history "LIBERAL" is blatantly absurd.
His popularity among those with incomes in the high 6's & 7's oughta be a clue and comes largely from his toying with the terms that help connect the people with democracy. Many forums calling themselves "liberal" are funded by his syndicate. Then there are forums, that "recommend" the posts they want us to see, comfortable that others unfavorable to the syndicate disappear quickly buried by the armies of Clinton vigilantes. As a result posts that don't conform to the new (Neo)-conservative's "damn the people" tyranny become exercises in futillity.
A message from this honest-to-god liberal to clintonistas: Quit kidding yourselves. You're worse than your republican brothers in that you robbed the people of the historic opposition party needed to keep democracy (relatively) honest. Your "conscience" can't be cleared by the fake Clinton lexicon. "Scrooge" had an awakening--it was just in time. And you, my friend?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wyrmhaven on Dec 31, 2006 8:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There wasn't enough space to post my idea here but you can read the whole thing here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TT2 on Sep 6, 2006 12:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: World Economy and Slave Wages
Posted by: freerain
» Mob rule beats tyrannical rule
Posted by: YogiBear
» what, read the title and hit reply?
Posted by: halophoenix
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 6, 2006 12:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people in the south who thought it was O.K. to undercut unions in the north screamed when the jobs started leaving the south for Mexico and elsewhere. The south cut a deal with the devil when they actively sought out industrial jobs with lax rules and no unions. They got pollution, a crappy tax base and a huge working poor population for a couple of decades and now have little to show for it.
Friends, America is a family and it's time we started acting like it. Until these 'Freewill Employment' and 'Right To Work' laws are struck from the books unions will not gain much traction outside of government and service jobs. Manufacturing will continue to hollow out and leave our country until we replace or repeal a whole list of treaties and trade agreements designed to export US jobs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: TT2
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: lively56
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: kww355
» RE: It Started Before Reagan
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 6, 2006 1:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: left out
Posted by: kww355
» RE: left out
Posted by: Patrissimo
» RE: left out
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: left out
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: left out
Posted by: Madam Hatter
» RE: left out
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ahmlco on Sep 6, 2006 1:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, for example, at the state of the automotive and airline industries. US automakers are bleeding cash (mostly due to once again zigging when they should have been zagging).
Be that as it may, many unions continued to demand an ever larger share of an ever-dwindling pie, with little to no thought as to the future consequences of their actions. But hey, at least today they can go back to their membership and say, "Look what we got you for your dues."
Yeah, plants closed when they're no longer competitive. Layoffs. Bankruptcies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: hms2004
» Unions are their own enemy!
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: lively56
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Flip side...uinons vs. bad corporate decisions
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: yesman
» RE: Flip side...
Posted by: magistre
» A non-union story
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 3:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way to get the power is to use the strategy of the labor unions. Make demands with an "or else".
The Lincoln Initiative is a a simple strategy. Each member tells the campaign commitees of both parties the issue that he/she wants in their platforms. The "or else" is that he/she tells them that he/she won't vote for a party that doesn't include that issue in their platform.
The working class has been divided by fear. The Republicans scare the religious right with "sinful wild-eyed liberals" and the Democrats scare the liberals with the "intolerant radical religious right. Each group votes for the "lesser evil" party.
Both parties need our votes. Now's the time to make them compete for them on issues important to the working class.
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The working class and the unions can regain power.
Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: The working class and the unions can regain power.
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: profmarcus on Sep 6, 2006 3:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, yes, I DO take it personally
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: agapegirl
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: yesman
» RE: there's another factor operating here too
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Sep 6, 2006 4:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for Reagan he certainly began the process. I was in California when he became governor and we had never witnessed such an inhumane elected offical like that before. Among other mentioned acts he closed all the State Hospitals creating what we now call the "homeless." For all his acting skills he was a heartless man whose true alooftness reflected his personal view that the masses were a "lesser" population to be used for the benefit of those more "superior." It continues today.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who Now Makes What You Buy
Posted by: hms2004
» RE: Who Now Makes What You Buy
Posted by: ALANHESTER
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ozlock on Sep 6, 2006 4:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In May 1, 1886, the Knights of Labor took to the streets to call for an eight-hour day. Eighty thousand workers shut down the city of Chicago. On May 4, 3,000 workers gathered in Haymarket Square. A bomb was thrown that killed seven policemen. Eight of the people present were rounded up, tried for murder, and sentenced to death. The Haymarket riot became the symbol of labor injustice in America."
Although not a scholar, I don't even think that all the defendants were present at the gathering. Moreover, not all defendants were sentenced to death.
Four were hanged. One committed suicide in jail, Governor Ogelsby commutted two sentences to life, and one had received a 15 year sentence. Governor Altgeld pardoned the survivors in a brilliant summation of the illegal actions of the prosecutors and the judge.
See http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/prisoner.htm
The Haymarket affair gave rise to May Day commemorations around the world. It has never been accepted by the U.S. government as such, partly due to the fact that it had been a big day for Russia, the Soviet Union and other Socialist governments.
My only hope is that people who jump on the Haymarket bandwagon would at least get the facts straight.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ozlock
Posted by: oneyedjack
» RE: ozlock
Posted by: drmflorida
» Roosevelt succeeded because socialism was growing rampantly. The class to which he was a traitor...
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 6, 2006 4:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To vote the politicians out
We’d still be ruled by sleazy smarties
Who give money to both parties
Here’s the truth without a doubt
No one can vote those rascals out!
It does no good to rant and holler
Can’t outvote that mighty dollar
People that our votes elected
Work for dollars they’ve collected
We can only take the reins
If we finance all campaigns!!
The candidates are not to blame
They play in a losing game
They can’t do good if they’re not in
But need both cash and votes to win
Our horse sense points to just one course
Cash and votes from just one source!!!
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Taxation without representation
Posted by: tashi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kww355 on Sep 6, 2006 5:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country would be a lot better off if we could mend both of these broken systems.
A strong national presence of unions even helps people who work in non-union places. Employers are forced to raise the wages and benefits offered ( perhaps not to the level of union workers, but still above the minimums ) in order to keep the good workers they have. A rising tide raises all boats.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good point.
Posted by: jreinhart1
» RE: Unions are a 'check and balance'
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 5:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: malcolmartin on Sep 6, 2006 6:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad truth is that the petty bourgeois cannot defeat the capitalist ruling class! They are a timid and passive group who, in this time for warriors, gather at the gates of the palace to nag and complain essentially to each other. There are scores of Internet websites, magazines, newspapers, radio programs and networks like AirAmerica Radio, and some small television networks where liberal, left, progressive, and other commentators show up to whine out loud. They rail against the outrages and inhumanity of the U.S. government and the Bush Administration. They point out the duplicity, the corruption, the hypocrisy, the inhumanity, and the utter criminality loosed in the world today but to no useful end since capitalism will not be reformed nor shamed to death. Pointing out the defects of capitalism has become as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. The ruling class brushes its liberal democratic critics off like gnats as long as they stay away from the third rail. But let one of these voices dare mention unity based on working class-consciousness and a mobilization to strike at profits and great danger would shortly thereafter visit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: daw13
» Reply to daw13
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: eply to daw13
Posted by: daw13
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: Gatsby
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: vangogh69
» Reply to Gatsby
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: yesman
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: There Is No Middle Class--Only Rulers And Workers
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnnyM on Sep 6, 2006 6:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just that most of the modern slaves, who are willing to work 80 hours per work and think us that refuse are 'losers,' are just that...willing slaves. It's the slave master whipping the other slaves into the 80 hours of work, only now most are willing.
Whoever above said there's another factor involved here, it's consumerism, is right. To combat this problem, the best way is stop buying! Bring our economy to it's knees!! It's the only way to revolt now, since mass rallies, unions and the press have all lost their effectiveness.
* Walk or ride your bike everywhere.
* Find the natural remedies to your minor illnesses.
* Buy your food from local small farmers, if they exist
* Don't buy that new gadget, you really don't need it
* etc, etc
To fight the system within the system (i.e. with politics and law) doesn't work anymore. So the democrats are useless too - We, the people, have to change the rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: loril
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery; HATS OFF to loril!!
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: yesman
» RE: Modern-Day Slavery
Posted by: yesman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sln70 on Sep 6, 2006 6:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT...
Why?
What could be the reasoning behind this madness? Sure, they want poor workers to exploit, it is their wet dream. But do they not also necessarily need people to buy the products that they produce?
Henry Ford was smart enough to see that he had to pay his workers enough to afford them one of his vehicles. Where has that mentality gone, and do "they" not see how shortsighted it is to impoverish EVERYONE?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» why??
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Whenever these discussions come up, I get confused
Posted by: jwg
» It only makes sense if you don't count certain people
Posted by: misterpunch
» RE: It only makes sense if you don't count certain people
Posted by: yesman
» I hear you both and totally agree.. but I'm still confused
Posted by: sln70
» RE: I hear you both and totally agree.. but I'm still confused
Posted by: yesman
» Why? Most CEOs are no smarter than anyone else.
Posted by: McJulie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 6, 2006 6:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that this war is "undeclared" is just total nonsense. Many saw this coming 30 and 40+ years ago. Get the people dumbed down, use debt as a smokescreen to allow people to think they're doing alright. Then pull the rug out from under them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Sep 6, 2006 7:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: And Remember
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albiegf13 on Sep 6, 2006 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's Human Nature...
Posted by: agapegirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rtdrury on Sep 6, 2006 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of retail corporations we need small local merchants. Instead of industrial corporations we need small local craftsmen. Instead of factory farms we need small local farms. Instead of giant electric power plants and grids, fossil gas, municiple water works, sewage and landfull waste disposal, and fossil transport fuel networks, we need small-time local electric/thermal cogeneration and biofuel production, water wells, composting and recycling.
Efficiencies of scale is a myth. Efficiencies peak at a very small scale enterprise. And that's a good thing for people because people need to work for themselves, not for the boss man.
While a giant retail or industrial enterprise appears to benefit society by forcing better prices from suppliers, much of these savings feed verious white-collar fluff industry - expensive advertising/marketing, "public relations", lobbying, legal, accounting, executive pay, perks, political donations, philanthropy, and more. Thus efficiencies peak with a smaller enterprise that omits all these extraneous expenditures.
Smaller enterprises mean more independence for more people so more people take on more responsibility in the civic arena. A larger pool of people involved in civic decisions is more effective at filtering out ideological extremism and replacing it with common sense policies in the public interest.
Centralized bureaucracies are less flexible. They encourage one-size-fits all solutions with the appearance of efficiency but which don't utilize local expertise particularly in agriculture. Also, more enterprises means more experimentation and trials undertaken. Nature succeeds with redundancy and diversity. We can benefit with more of that, especially if we can communicate results.
Smaller software enterprises have proven to be much more cooperative in building open stansdards for interoperability and platform independence.
Smaller enterprises tend to avoid violating the sovereignty of the consumer in the market and the sovereignty of the people in civic affairs. Smaller enterprises tend to avoid manipulating the public discourse and debates, perceptions and policy. Smaller enterprises tend to play by the rules instead of trying to set the rules.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yesman
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yesman
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: mobile68
» RE: We Don't Need Labor Unions
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: haddit on Sep 6, 2006 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was forced to leave the workforce early because of stress. The "open door" policy was simply a name with no basis in fact, and employers and their pets are aware that harrassment is the first step in getting rid of someone who "doesn't fit". If that fails, the laws back them up to terminate for no cause.
My main jobs were sent overseas. The last one I had was in a company which downsized, and I was one of those left to do twice the amount of work.
When I was younger, work was my release, my pride. The last few years of my working life involved overwork, verbal abuse, intimidation and, on one job, if I even stood up to head to the restroom, I had three supervisors arrive to find out why I was standing up!
My son is going through the same thing now but, luckily, is young, is very good in the profession he loves, and has learned to stand up for himself. But, still, there is no insurance, no paid vacation, and must pay $200/week in gas to get between his home and his jobsite.
As for me, I am now living on less than half of what I used to make, and was forced to move from a my 3-bedroom home into a studio apartment, all I could afford in my new life.
But I've been put in a position to see some who have really been shattered by this economy. Every time I hear Bush talk about this booming economy, I want to scream -- but I can't afford to lose my home for a noise violation!
The bottom line is we need to bring our jobs back to the US, and we need to return to an atmosphere of pride and mutual respect in the workplace. Until we do that, students will continue to drop out of school, seeing no future for themselves or families.
We're in a sorry, sorry situation in this country. I want better for my grandchildren. We should all stand up and demand better. When Bush talks about how great things are, we should bombard him with letters from real people. I can think of something else, too, but that could get me arrested!
Wel need to stand up for ourselves, because our government has enough money that it has been able to buy dark glasses that cut off their view from the real world.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This country is a mere shadow of its formal self, and it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda!
Posted by: badkitty
» RE: This country is a mere shadow of its formal self, and it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda!
Posted by: dougo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bigart on Sep 6, 2006 8:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 64 lobbyists PER USA Congressperson, thus those with the most money, are able to buy 'democracy'
The most revolutionary minded of all the founding fathers was the radical writer, Tom Paine. With flaming hopes, a vision of a new world and compelled by the spirit and determination of its people to resist British occupation, Paine devoted himself to the American cause. He began with a forty page pamphlet, "Common Sense" which emboldened the settlers to become compatriots and rise up in rebellion. His words formed a nation where democracy is still being defined.
"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine
William Blake penned, "Imagination is evidence of the Divine" and Tom Paine imagined, "We have it in our power to begin the world again." Paine's imaginary democratic government would guarantee freedom to all, and above all else freedom of conscience and worship -which required keeping the church out of state affairs. It was in that spirit that he wrote about Independence Day:
"Let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the Word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know...that in America THE LAW IS KING."
"...a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine
On with THAT Revolution!
public service message from the
.org
WeAreWideAwake
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We the People and Reality
Posted by: yesman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 6, 2006 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the progressive movement would focus more on these sort of things rather than gender/race/global warming/ back-to-nature-movements/etc., they would recapture alot of the power and influence that created the early reforms mentioned in the article.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wawa on Sep 6, 2006 8:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
~George W. Bush
Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official...
~Theodore Roosevelt
The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people.
~Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis
The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault.
~Major Ralph Peters, US Military
DO SOMETHING
~eileen fleming
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Sep 6, 2006 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Sep 6, 2006 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earlier today, I wrote to you and Laura Barcella on “The Slow Death of the Middle Class.” I think your discussion there and here is extremely essential. I believe the need for unions is also significant one. I will submit my previous comment here, though I will add an additional missive to the reading list.
A month or more ago I wrote an exposé on the subject of unions and their recent demise. I cited the campaign to eliminate them further. I invite you to review and comment on,
• “The Center for Union Facts” Fuels Fiction ©.
I greatly appreciate this assessment. I think this discussion is infinitely important. However, I believe talk of the classes and the masses is often too narrow.
I experience that Economists look at policies and practices and not at the pervasive philosophy that lies beneath these. While I think it is true, after the Depression and World War II gains among the average Joe and Joann were made, the poorer began to prosper and the middle class became more settled and secure, I believe the truly rich never allowed for an authentic advancement.
Now, that the Bush Dynasty is solidly in place, the plan is firmer. Bush and his corporate cohorts have advanced strategies that secure their status in society. They have also made certain that all others know their station.
I surmise that there are the elite and those that serve them. Some within the service branch are given greater privileges. Therefore, they feel comfortable, even independent. Yet, in a nation where only the top one percent of the population is doing better I think the middle class has virtually vanished. It won’t be long now.
I invite you to read two treatises that I recently authored.
• "Income Inequity. The Real Reason the Rich Get Richer. ©"
• "Death Tax Keeps The Wealthy Rich. With Increased Wages, Poor Lose ©"
It is only the giving that makes us what [who] we are. - Ian Anderson. Jethro Tull . . . Betsy
Betsy L. Angert Be-Think
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Undeclared, Unions, and Middle Class
Posted by: Conservasaurus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: y_hat on Sep 6, 2006 11:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Raise the national tax up to 40% for the upper income brackets but once it head north of 50%, I can assure you that the incentive to work in a higher paid professional career *in* *america* will drop. While I can't speak for doctors and lawyers, I can say that top scientists and engineers in america (with masters or phd) will start looking to other countries to do their work, particularly if they are a two-income family, and it is common these days for higher-end scientists and engineers (including software engineering) to have a partner with the same career. This just sounds like a way for ending any desire to do innovative work in the US.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70% - your calculations are incorrect
Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70%
Posted by: PJH67
» RE: Progressive tax yes, but not 70% - Investor class invited to join
Posted by: Uncle Crabby
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 6, 2006 11:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WOW!
Posted by: Aim
» RE: WOW!
Posted by: Tom Degan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: J-Bonnes on Sep 6, 2006 12:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: J-Bonnes, Good post! I would suggest using
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: J-Bonnes: Very interesting site. With all that is
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: J-Bonnes. OOPS! I doubled up the post.
Posted by: SamFox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mom'z the word on Sep 6, 2006 12:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We would have to go back and change some fundamental errors made at the offset by our founders before we can even hope to change the direction we are now heading towards which is a 2 class society upper and lower. It is impossible to promote one class without exploiting another. If the middle class regains its status it must happen at whose expense? The middle class originally existed at the expense of the lower class. As we became a nation of every man for himself, Reagan legacy, no one seemed too concerned with the hardships endured by the lower class. Their situation was of no importance to the majority and ruling middle class and this sealed their fate. In order for a middle class to exist, someone has to be on the bottom, and on top, that’s is what class is all about. Is this really what we want?
Because we started out with slaves it was only natural that once the slaves gained status someone had to take their place in a society built on slavery. What we are seeing today is the natural progression of that slave mentality taking the next step. The middle class has taken its rightful place as the slave class in order for the upper class to secure its place on top. The middle class was o.k. with doing this to the lower class so none of this should come as a surprise.
A corporation as an individual with all the rights and protections of a citizen of the United States has taken the upper class position. It gained status with the Rockefellers, Carnegie, and just got worst. If you want class this is what happens. Class as in fictitious person, definition of a corporation, is diametrically opposed to the whole entire concept of a country owned and operated by the people for the people and of the people.
Unless we can all agree on what makes a democracy it stands to reason that we can never achieve that which is unknown to us.
What it would take to turn this country around and put us all on equal footing is a selfless act establishing once and for all Equal Justice for all. Our Bill of Rights guarentees Equal Justice for all. But the Bill of Rights is not a Law and therefore has no legal standing in any state in the U.S. This means no one is automatically entitled to free speech, equal protection, due process, etc as a citizen living within a state in the United States, which is everyone. To get your rights you have to go to court and beg for them. Rights are not inalienable if they are not the Law. That is why citizens do not have any rights as workers. Make the Bill of Rights a Law and all that changes. Citizens are now automatically recognized as persons with rights because it is Law. Bonus is corporations now have no legal standing in the eyes of the law because they are not a real person. This pretty much wipes out the upper class per se. Forcing Congress to vote the Bill of Rights into a Law would be the single most revolutionary act of our history. And no body died in the process.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A revolution in the works: mom'z the word give us a lot to
Posted by: SamFox
» RE: A revolution in the works
Posted by: mobile68
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jende on Sep 6, 2006 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Power of the People
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gregor on Sep 6, 2006 4:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way to beat the corporations at their own game is not to feed into the game. Then who is in control? Get out of the mindset of "have to's" and get into the mind set of "totally free to do whatever." YOU RULE!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: traynor on Sep 6, 2006 5:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Sep 6, 2006 5:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ocean tides on Sep 7, 2006 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's worked throughout history, and it has been making inroads during these past six years. Tactics differ but the idea is blatantly classic.
It's up to all of us as voters to see through this most extraordinary means of power and control over everyones' lives. The shear incidiousness of these ways and means of pulling the wool over people's (read 'sheep's') eyes has got to stop lest we wind up continuing to settle for crumbs off the table as those in power consume their silkened cakes at everyone's expense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yellow on Sep 7, 2006 12:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hartmann's got the domestic platform for the Democrats!
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Franco33 on Sep 7, 2006 8:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to reality.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sorry America, what makes you think you're so special?
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: calibandita on Sep 8, 2006 8:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, "The Meek Shale Inherit The Earth", not the people who step on those who are less fortunate and use them up 'till they drop!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Geni on Sep 9, 2006 6:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1129-26.htm
However, we really need not only honest vote counting but also some sort of proportional representatio.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NeoCogito on Sep 10, 2006 10:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody knows Republicans have always been conservative and long identified with elitism & platforms that hurt the people. So here comes Clintonomics with the cynical term "Neo-Con," NEW conservatives, confident the people won't figure out the *NEW conservatives could only be the elitist Clinton-Zealots, who nullified our party in the 90's. They say we're dumb and vote against ourselves, what they won't tell us is the fake news, finessing and all the pains they take to keep us that way. Time to quit recreational debate and disssociate ourselves from Clintonomics. To call the president, who institutionalized the most significant collection of right wing reforms in modern history "LIBERAL" is blatantly absurd.
His popularity among those with incomes in the high 6's & 7's oughta be a clue and comes largely from his toying with the terms that help connect the people with democracy. Many forums calling themselves "liberal" are funded by his syndicate. Then there are forums, that "recommend" the posts they want us to see, comfortable that others unfavorable to the syndicate disappear quickly buried by the armies of Clinton vigilantes. As a result posts that don't conform to the new (Neo)-conservative's "damn the people" tyranny become exercises in futillity.
A message from this honest-to-god liberal to clintonistas: Quit kidding yourselves. You're worse than your republican brothers in that you robbed the people of the historic opposition party needed to keep democracy (relatively) honest. Your "conscience" can't be cleared by the fake Clinton lexicon. "Scrooge" had an awakening--it was just in time. And you, my friend?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wyrmhaven on Dec 31, 2006 8:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There wasn't enough space to post my idea here but you can read the whole thing here.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




