Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Photo Posed with Racist Group Haunts George Allen

By Max Blumenthal, TheNation.com. Posted September 1, 2006.


The Virginia senator claimed his 'macaca' comment was a mistake. But George Allen has a long and cozy history with white supremacists.
georgeallengroup
george-allen-group

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Max Blumenthal

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Barnstorming around Virginia in the re-election campaign that Republican Senator George Allen hopes will provide the impetus for his 2008 run for the presidency, he has suddenly been forced on the defensive. Time and again, he has felt compelled to explain that his mocking of S.R. Sidarth, a young Indian-American staff member for his Democratic opponent, as "macaca," or monkey, was an unintentional gaffe. "It was a mistake. I made a mistake," he told a reporter from a local NBC affiliate at a campaign stop on Thursday. Hours later, he told the ABC affiliate, "It was a mistake, I was wrong." On Fox News's Sean Hannity show, he echoed, "It was a mistake."

But was it an isolated "mistake"?

Only a decade ago, as governor of Virginia, Allen personally initiated an association with the Council of Conservative Citizens, the successor organization to the segregationist White Citizens Council and among the largest white supremacist groups.

In 1996, when Governor Allen entered the Washington Hilton Hotel to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference, an annual gathering of conservative movement organizations, he strode to a booth at the entrance of the exhibition hall festooned with two large Confederate flags -- a booth operated by the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC), at the time a co-sponsor of CPAC. After speaking with CCC founder and former White Citizens Council organizer Gordon Lee Baum and two of his cohorts, Allen suggested that they pose for a photograph with then-National Rifle Association spokesman and actor Charlton Heston. The photo appeared in the Summer 1996 issue of the CCC's newsletter, the Citizens Informer.

According to Baum, Allen had not naively stumbled into a chance meeting with unfamiliar people. He knew exactly who and what the CCC was about and, from Baum's point of view, was engaged in a straightforward political transaction. "It helped us as much as it helped him," Baum told me. "We got our bona fides." And so did Allen.

Descended from the White Citizens' Councils that battled integration in the Jim Crow South, the CCC is designated a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center. In its "Statement of Principles,"

The CCC declares, "We also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind, to promote non-white races over the European-American people through so-called "affirmative action" and similar measures, to destroy or denigrate the European-American heritage, including the heritage of the Southern people, and to force the integration of the races."

The CCC has hosted several conservative Republican legislators at its conferences, including former Representative Bob Barr of Georgia and Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi. But mostly it has been a source of embarrassment to Republicans hoping to move their party beyond its race-baiting image. Former Reagan speechwriter and conservative pundit Peggy Noonan pithily declared that anyone involved with the CCC "does not deserve to be in a leadership position in America."

Asked whether Allen supports or deplores the CCC, John Reid, his communications director pleaded ignorance. "I am unaware of the group you mention or their agenda and because we have no record of the Senator having involvement with them I cannot offer you any opinion on them," Reid told me in an e-mail response.

In posing for a picture that he knew the CCC would use to promote itself and him, and would be circulated to true believers, Allen joined a tradition of conservative Southern politicians seeking to burnish their neo-Confederate credentials. In 2003, former Republican National Committee Chairman and Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour took a photograph with revelers at the CCC's "Blackhawk Rally," a fundraising event for white "private academies." In the subsequent hailstorm of media criticism, after reporters discovered that the CCC had posted photos of Barbour on its website, Barbour pointedly refused to demand that the group remove them. Though Barbour came from an old and influential Mississippi family in Yazoo, he had spent a long time as a lobbyist in Washington. "In Mississippi, one of the biggest problems he had was they thought he [Barbour] was a scalawag. So it didn't hurt him in Mississippi," Baum said of the photos. "Nobody said, 'Oh my golly!'" Despite the CCC photos becoming a campaign issue, or partly perhaps because of it, Barbour handily won re-election in 2003.

But George Allen's relationship with the CCC is different; it went beyond poses and portraits. In 1995, he appointed a CCC sympathizer, Virginia lawyer R. Jackson Garnett, to head the Virginia Council on Day Care and serve on the Governor's Advisory Council on Self-Determination and Federalism. According to the CCC's Citizens Informer, Garnett delivered a speech before a CCC gathering saying that the Federalism Commission was "created to study abuses by the Federal government of constitutional powers that rightfully belong to the states."

Later that year, Garnett closed the Virginia Council on Day Care after accusing it, as he wrote in a letter to Governor Allen, of attempting to "form the minds of our young children with a radical ideology before they enter public schools." The Virginia Council had aroused Garnett's ire, according to the Virginian-Pilot newspaper, for preparing an "anti-bias" curriculum for day care teachers. Allen approved the shut-down.

Allen's Advisory Council on Self-Determination and Federalism bore an eerie resemblance to the Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government, a state agency that engaged in lobbying and propaganda in support of "massive resistance" to integration. One typical pamphlet published by the Commission declared, "We do not propose to defend racial discrimination. We do defend, with all the power at our command, the citizen's right to discriminate."

A year after the trashing of the Virginia Council on Day Care, Allen expressed his fervent belief in states' rights in a letter to the largest neo-Confederate group, the Sons of Confederate Veterans. On the occasion of the group's centennial, in 1996, Allen wrote, "Your efforts are especially worthy of recognition as across our country, Americans are charting a new direction--away from the failed approach of centralized power in Washington, and back to the founders' design of a true federal system of shared powers and dual sovereignty." Then Allen appropriated Lincoln's language in the Gettysburg Address about "a new birth of freedom": "By doing so," wrote Allen, "our country is helping to foster a rebirth of freedom for all Americans and will allow the states to chart their own course and control their own destinies as intended by the Constitution."

Allen was not alone in sending congratulations to the SCV; twelve other governors and Mississippi Senator Trent Lott--an SCV member--joined him. However, according to Ed Sebesta, a Dallas, Texas-based researcher of the neo-Confederate movement, Allen's letter was unique. "The other governors wrote mostly sentimental blather to the SCV," Sebesta said. "But Allen's letter really expressed the neo-Confederate view of the Southern tradition and showed him to be a neo-Confederate in his thinking."

The year after his letter to the SCV, Allen issued a proclamation, drafted by the local SCV, declaring April as Confederate History and Heritage Month--the month Fort Sumter was attacked and Lincoln assassinated. Once again, Allen's proclamation was laced with neo-Confederate ideology, describing the Civil War as "a four-year struggle for independence and sovereign rights." He avoided any mention of slavery.

Days after Allen's proclamation, the SCV celebrated at the US Capitol. The featured speaker was Richard T. Hines, an influential Republican lobbyist and neo-Confederate financier who, a year earlier, had protested the erection of a memorial to black tennis star Arthur Ashe in downtown Richmond, Virginia as "an attempt to debunk our heritage." The NAACP condemned Allen's SCV-inspired proclamation, while Confederate Memorial Association President John Edward Hurley called the SCV's celebration at the Capitol one of "the worst capitulations to white supremacy" since the Ku Klux Klan marched down Pennsylvania Avenue in 1920.

At the same time Allen also cultivated support from the SCV's sister organization, the United Daughters of the Confederacy. He was a frequent guest at their conventions and in March, 1997, in his second letter of commendation to the group, praised its members for "promoting historical accuracy and a clear understanding of the War Between the States," employing a euphemism for the Civil War popularized by neo-Confederate groups. (An article in a 1989 issue of the UDC magazine asserted that "the worse suffering group among those engaged in the [slave] trade" was "the crews of slave ships.")

When asked whether Allen supports or deplores the SCV, his communications director Reid replied in an e-mail, "Governors routinely send greetings to individuals and organizations and that is what the constituent service office did in this case. I am certain you will note the inclusive language in the letter advocating 'a rebirth of freedom for all Americans.'" As with the CCC, Reid did not offer any condemnation of the SCV.

At the height of Allen's governorship, in Spring 1995, the CCC's Citizens Informer praised him: "Residents of the Old Dominion are rejoicing." But the CCC's invisible support became a potentially controversial matter after a 1998 Washington Post article by Thomas Edsall disclosed the CCC's links to Bob Barr. CPAC head David Keene ousted them from his conference, bluntly telling the Post of his sudden discovery: "They are racists."

Baum, for his part, maintains that Keene and CPAC's attendees were well aware of his group's racial views. "David Keene, he knew who we were," Baum told me. "I mean, you have Confederate flags on each sides of your booth -- like, duh. But after the proverbial you-know-what hit the fan, he didn't want us there." (Baum said he "finagled" tickets for the 2006 CPAC convention and promoted the CCC from behind the National Rifle Association's booth.)

In 2001, Governor Allen became Senator Allen. Almost as soon as he was inaugurated, he was forced to choose between the Lost Cause and his own ambition. Trent Lott set in motion Allen's supposed reconstruction. At a 2002 birthday party for Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, Lott praised Thurmond's segregationist 1948 presidential campaign. At first, Allen rushed to Lott's defense, calling him "a decent and honorable man." Lott, however, soon became radioactive. The Washington Post reported Lott's links to the CCC; his tenure as Senate Majority Leader became wobbly. Karl Rove, Bush's chief political strategist and a White House aide, pressured Republican senators to remove Lott from his leadership position. (Rove preferred the more compliant Bill Frist in the Senate's top post.) Allen saw his own opportunity in Lott's disgrace. Overnight, he went from being staunch Lott supporter to outspoken Lott critic. Calling for Lott's resignation, Allen dubbed his remarks "offensive... to those touched by the viciousness of segregation."

In the wake of Lott's fall, Allen dramatically pronounced the end of institutional racism. "This is a day that the United States Senate, with Trent Lott's resignation, has buried, graveyard-dead-and-gone, the days of discrimination and segregation," he proclaimed. With discrimination "graveyard-dead," Allen clearly hoped questions about his own past would be buried as well.

In 2000, he had hung a noose at his law office. When that fact was reported, he claimed it had "nothing to do with lynching." When it was reported that he also hung large Confederate flags in his house, he explained they were part of his flag collection. Allen had also opposed the 1991 Civil Rights Act and making Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday a holiday.

Using the Lott incident, Allen stepped forward as a champion the legacy of the civil rights movement. He boasted to Ryan Lizza of The New Republic of his "civil rights" pilgrimage to Selma, Alabama in 2002 with Democratic Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, a former Freedom Rider. In 2005, together with Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Allen co-sponsored a formal apology for slavery. He was carrying the banner of a new brand of Republicanism that compensated for its opposition to affirmative action and social spending with symbolic condemnations of what President George W. Bush deemed "the baggage of bigotry."

But the goodwill Allen may have earned with his image makeover evaporated on August 11 in Breaks, Virginia, a rural town deep in the heart of Appalachia. Before an all-white crowd, he called S.R. Sidarth "Macaca, or whatever his name is." When Allen asked the crowd to "welcome Macaca here" to "America and the real world of Virginia," his audience hooted and hollered. Below the media's radar--and away from every camera except the one in Sidarth's palm--Allen was raising a supposedly buried but still vibrant racially charge populism.

Now Allen finds himself in a quandary. While he atones for his racist gaffe in order to succeed in the 2008 Republican primaries, he cannot afford to alienate the neo-Confederate movement that helped propelled his career during the 1990s. As Allen begs forgiveness for his "mistake," his spokesman avoids criticizing groups like the SCV and CCC. "The neo-Confederates could break a Republican candidate, especially in South Carolina, where they're extremely organized," Sebesta observes.

Senator John McCain's misadventure with the neo-Confederate movement in the 2000 South Carolina primary provides a cautionary tale that must not be lost on Allen. Facing George W. Bush in South Carolina, McCain hired Richard Quinn as his state field manager. Quinn was an editor of the neo-Confederate magazine Southern Partisan, and a frequent critic of Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, who he once dubbed a "terrorist." Before the primary, Quinn organized a rally of 6,000 people in support of flying the Confederate flag over the statehouse. Quinn dressed up McCain volunteers in Confederate Army uniforms as they passed fliers to the demonstrators assuring them that McCain supported the Confederate flag.

As soon as news spread that McCain had called for removal of the Dixie flag from the statehouse, the SCV's Richard T. Hines funded the distribution of 250,000 fliers accusing McCain of "changing his tune" and describing Bush as "the [only] major candidate who refused to call the Confederate flag a racist symbol." Bush surged ahead of McCain and took South Carolina, dooming McCain's presidential hopes.

"People didn't buy it," Baum told me about McCain's gambit. "When he thought the flag issue would help him, he was for it. When thought it wouldn't help him, going north, he denounced it. And you still have all these gullible liberals who think McCain's a saint."

Now, Allen is trying to lay the groundwork for his own Southern Strategy in 2008. On August 9, he took time out of his re-election campaign to keynote the South Carolina GOP's state convention. If he can overcome the controversies over his past in his Senate race, Allen may yet get to play his old game once again.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Max Blumenthal is a freelance journalist based in Los Angeles. Read his blog at maxblumenthal.blogspot.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
chilling
Posted by: yellow on Sep 1, 2006 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a chilling expose' not of a politician and his slurs but of an entire political culture. Reading through the blog and its web links one gets a frightening picture of the attitudes, mentality, and right-wing extremist undercurrents of the current administration. They are warmongering, racist, plutocratic, and wish to replace our current democracy with a repressive and segmented patrimonial state that is as unequal and socially backward as any third world society currently ruled by dictatorship.

Although I hate to be myopic and sectionalist I do think much of the problem is the American South as the article and its links seem to imply. There is a real problem there. I do not believe that most of these folks understand or respect democracy. The matter is deeply historical.

It seems that in the 300 year pre-colonial period leading up to American independance, the institution of slavery and the slave trade created two nations and indeed parts of two distinct geo-political spheres within the same continguous territory on the North American continent. The North became a bastion of Jacksonian Democracy whose social base seemed to be petty industrial craftsmen, urban merchants, yeoman farmers and laborers. Beginning with the Irish, Polish, and German immigration waves in the 1846-1865 period, the North became increasingly urbanized and ethnically diverse. This period conincided with revolutionary upheaval on the continent of Europe. Immigrant political influence introduced European social democratic ideals into domestic US discourse which also reenforced support for the democratic foundations of the US political system.

The South's European population was more homogeneous (English and Scots-Irish) and slavery prevailed. The South was more historically and geopolitically linked to the other parts of the Caribbean Basin from the Gulf of Mexico to the Islands and down to the Brazilian coast. The non-US portion of this region recieved over 80% of the nearly 350 years of slave traffic. Almost all of it related to global sugar production and trade while the US part of the slave system was committed to cotton and tobacco. This labor repressive slave system has deep social and historical consequences. The old style Patrimonialism, the rigid class structure, racial codes and hierarchies from the slave period, political clientelism, social customs, religious fanaticism, intolerance, and vast inequalities are all holdovers from this old world reality. It is not suprising that in an epoch of conservative corporate capitalist globalization, such a tradition would become the political anchor of a system wanting to eschew the social and political gains of civil rights, the labor movement, the movement for social reform, a minimum income standard, and a social safety net, women's rights that came to epitomise Northern concepts of a truely democratic society.

I am not saying that the North is perfect and the South has no redeeming qualities. What I am saying is that there is a historic legacy that makes the unfortunate use of "culture wars" and intolerance a feasible instrument of the right and allows the revival of this reactionary historic tradition to be spread over the entire sphere of American society at large as it suits global monopoly capitalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-Racism is not the end-all, be-all of political activism.
Posted by: rebel_pig on Sep 2, 2006 2:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It aint the end of the world if someone hates people of another color. All sorts of people of all different skin colors are racist. That don't mean the world is going to end tomorrow.

Most white Americans are sick and tired of seeing themselves as a race be portrayed as racist monsters, when they know that there are lots of black people who are racist too. It's getting a little old. Time to shift tactics and pursue other, more productive, more urgently needed political goals. You ever hear of beating a dead horse?

Of course, now this makes me David Duke, Grand Wizard of the KKK, right? I'm Hitler, right?

Yawn.....

same old Fake-Left windup ideological warriors....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I thought trolls were green.... Posted by: supercrisp
People can change
Posted by: PJH67 on Sep 2, 2006 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator Allen may have made some mistakes in his past. People can grow and their attitudes and beliefs can change.

A racist past hasn't stopped Democrats from voting for Robert Byrd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's Macacca Posted by: mat38
» RE: People can change Posted by: Golightly
» He's a racist. Period. Posted by: perri6
» RE: People can change Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: People can change Posted by: Michelle
» RE: People can change Posted by: Golightly
» RE: People can change Posted by: peritonlogon
» RE: People can change Posted by: PJH67
» You are very welcome. Posted by: mat38
» RE: You are very welcome. Posted by: PJH67
» RE: You are very welcome. Posted by: mat38
» RE: People can change Posted by: goodbreedin
A sure way to reelection..sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Sep 2, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that should lead to landslide victory this fall, the neo cons will vote twice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If he was really smart he would have worn his white gown and poi nty hat to hide his face
Posted by: mat38 on Sep 2, 2006 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheez whizz. what the hell is wrong with Virginians? They elected an elitest version of David Duke? Maybe people should befing asking why so many southern white men have ties to racist hate groups AND at thesame time why do they call themselves Christians?

The answer is that the republican party is the the party if the KU KLUX KLAN.

These same people were Democrats during the reconstruction period and they were the dominant party of the segregated south until they switched parties enmasse between the Johnson to Reagan period. "It's the KLAN stupid" should be a slogan democrats use to describe the Republicans.
Democrats won;t capitalize on this though because they have no guts to fight like a Karl Rove pit bull.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The People of the South
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 2, 2006 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first posting on the top of this page, by the person who identifies him/herself as "Yellow", put it better than I can ever hope to. This person tiltled the posting "Chilling". That is an understatement.

The biggest problem we face in this country is the south. Or, more properly, the southern people. This may offend some of you but you cannot deny the essential truth of what I'm saying. The quality of representitive they send to Washington with depressing regularity is atrocious. The list of reactionary, zenophobic, homophobic and racist neanderthals from that region of the country that have made themselves at home in the House and the Senate is seemingly endless. True, there are moderate, even progressive white southerners, but they are as rare these days as flowers in a pig sty. (Hey! That ain't a bad analogy!)

Interperate this any way you like: It is not white people who are going to save the south, that's for sure. Southern whites, the overwhelming majority of them, are perfectly content to leave things just the way they are. Ironcially the people who are soing to save southeners from themselves are the people who, in reality, built the south (Are ya listenin', Massa?) It is the people of color, the people who will eventually bear the ultimate brunt of the right wing agenda, who will have to rise up and say, "No more".

Some will condemn this but is a documented and undeniable fact: White southerners have never put much of an emphasis on public education. With few exceptions, it has been neglected and underfunded. That's why so many people south of the Mason Dixon line are so jaw droppingly dumb. Don't accuse me of being an ignorant ethno centrist. I know what I'm talking about! I've traveled extensively down there! This is the raw, unpleasant and unvarnished truth! Please don't make the argument that in ordr to get to the senate and the White House, one has to have a certain amount of intelligence. That's not true! You have to be pretty sharp to become a senator from Vermont. That's not true if you want to be mnown as the "gentleman from Mississippi". Can you even, in your wildest dreams, imagine some one as gut-wrenchingly stupid as, say, Phil Graham even getting nominated in Connecticuit? I rest my case.

Here it is in a nut shell: White southerners are destroying this country. Yes, I know they have northern confederates! Yes, I know that southerners havn't cornered the market on stupidity! Yes, I realize that most southerners are good and decent people - it is just that so many of them choose to keep themselves in a state of cleulessness. Ignorance may be many things: Bliss it is not. It isn't easy for me to say this, folks. My family history on my mother's side is primarily southern. I am a direct descendant of Roger B. Taney, the author of the Dred Scott decision, the worst Chief Justice in American history. I'm not talking out of ignorance. I'm talking from a deep perspective of knowledge of American history as well as a history of my own family.

I choose to be optomistic. I believe in my own heart that the south shall rise - just not in the way the forces of darkness hope for. White bigots have fucked-up that region of the country beyond hope. It'd time for a new mindset. It's wakey time down south.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Um, that’s a bit simple.... Posted by: supercrisp
» Fighting fire with fire. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: thweems
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: yellow
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: vangogh69
» wait a minute Posted by: psychochurch
» RE: The People of the South Posted by: Southern Gadfly
What did Malcolm X say?
Posted by: perri6 on Sep 2, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""Stop talking about The South. South is anything south of the Canadian border." And even Canada has its issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What did Malcolm X say? Posted by: ignition
It never ends. . . .
Posted by: Topaz on Sep 2, 2006 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK people, first off is you're acting all shocked that a Republican could be racist. What did you expect? What does the Republican party represent? Money and power. And they will slander, cheat, manipulate even sell out their own mothers to get what they want. Those lovable, toothless, bigoted, Jesus-freak, self-righteous hootin and hollerin rednecks. But let's not forget the other side of the coin. If a black person gets wet in the rain then the rain is racist. Someone is always playing race cards. Let's face it folks, things will never get better. No matter how badly you want everyone to get along, it will never happen. There will always be some asshole who has to take a dump in the punchbowl. You simply cannot count on people to use their brains. Yeah, it would be great if everyone would just shut the hell up and coexist, but stupidity will always stand in the way. There is no perfect utopia. We can only hope that the fucksticks in charge will fall under their own follies and hypocricies. Oh, how we hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not "the south" -- it's white supremacy
Posted by: Michelle on Sep 2, 2006 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe it is more overt in "the South" but I do question whether one manifestation is worse than another simply because it is more overt.

I question this because of other discussions I have seen recently on alternet ... When white posters to alternet start the distancing dance (the problem isn't systemic racism/white supremacy -- in this case, "it's The South") it doesn't lead to clarity, IMO. (and yes, I know that the two posters raising this point as of this reading are white, from other discussions)

Max is very good at documenting connections with and to overt white supremacy. This is very useful work, I think, and he's done it in varioius ways and all are politically useful. But it isn't the whole of the problem and I hope that we white "progressive" people don't take this as an opportunity to distance ourselves from the perhaps subtler but equally as powerful workings of racism in "the North" and hey, even our own ranks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The South and the Culture Wars
Posted by: yellow on Sep 2, 2006 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem of the deep South is historic. As noted it developed separately from the North over many centuries as part of an inter-regional slave system encompassing the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean Islands, and the Caribbean coast of South and Central America. The American South fit geo-politically more into this region than the American North with which it is physically contiguous. It was historically fated, however, to come under US sovereignty though it resisted this once unsuccessfully. As a consequence of its historic development, post-bellum Southern society evolved into a highly unequal, partimonial society with many oppressive social and political institutions and attitudes which are absent in the North.

The problem isn't the people of the South. They are also victims. The problem is the revival of a culture war based on the sudden activation of old oppressive attitudes and traditions to promote a national political agenda that is neither Northern or Southern but corporate. Such an agenda serves only the richest of the Bush constituency.

The problem is as cultural as it is socio-economic. As the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci pointed out, the modern ruling class "extends its class sphere over the whole of bourgeous society" through cultural and ideological hegemony. This means defining the perameters of accepted political discourse. It also shapes the existing mores and attitudes.

Change must come to the South in order to free the North. This is because we are ONE polity. The change in the South will not come from white males but everyone else. It is essential to note that Kim Gandy, the President of NOW, is from the deep South. The fight against reactionary political culture which is anchored in the south where its appeal is stongest is key to winning the national fight. The first of these struggles is to separate church and state. This will cut the legs out from under the clerico-fascists. Next on the agenda after political secularization (didn't we win that one with the French Revolution?) is a peace movement and a peace divident to finance social reform. Of course trade unionism can play a key role in this struggle. It will be a long and difficult fight. I believe we must win the South to save US democracy just as we did a century and a half ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's not what I'm saying;... Posted by: ABetterFuture
If the problem . . .
Posted by: yesman on Sep 2, 2006 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . is "the South" or "the Southern people," as several of the presumably enlightened posters above aver, then why has this situation not radically altered with the seemingly endless Southern migration of Yankees, who now litter every street and clog every mall in the region? And why would so very many enlightened, upstanding Northerners want to move to such a primitive and backwards region, anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If the problem . . . Posted by: yellow
Why isn't the oppression of gays and lesbians just as heinous as being racist?
Posted by: raidousa1 on Sep 3, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racists of the past and present are usually sexist and homophobic too.

Let’s not forget that the current attack against gay and lesbians is just as heinous as the widespread racism of yesteryear.

It is obviously NOT socially acceptable to be racist… we now need to bring the same sensibility to our gay and lesbian family, friends and neighbors- oppression uses the same tactics and rhetoric for all it's many shades of hate and even though it is not socially acceptable to be racist why is it seemingly socially acceptable to carry the same hate towards lesbians and gays? A rose by any other name!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism alive and flourishing in the south
Posted by: dougo on Sep 3, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The residents of Virginia and so much of the south are living in a world of make believe if they elect a senator such as Allen. Hello. This is 2006, not 1706. Virginia, the Carolinas, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, Texas, just to name a few remain terribly racist. I drove a truck for several years and heard the slurs and threats broadcast over the CB many times by white drivers to a black driver. I am white but just listening to this hatred even scared me. I can't imagine what went through this one particular drivers mind in Louisiana. It had to be pure terror.I know many times black drivers won't even go into a truck stop in these states,or if they have to go in for fuel they stay in their truck and never go into the restaurant . I was taken aback when in Mississippi a black man was standing by the door of a truck stop and as I approached he opened the door for me and says "here you go boss." I thanked him and he looked as though my response was not expected. At first I thought it a kindness and maybe it was, then I thought it was ingrained in him to be subservient to any white man. I hope it was the former. I visited the SPLC website link with the photo of Haley Barbour, a self-proclaimed racist and saw the list of 26 supporters of the CCC in elected positions in the south. Ignorance of this groups stated mission seems to be the underlying excuse of these politicians for speaking to this group, with the noted exception of Rep. Tommy Woods who proclaims to have spoke to the CCC more times than is written up in their newsletter. Unrepentant supporter he says. Jesus is our savior conservatives says he. These Cretans must be expelled from our government immediately. Also election poll watchers need to be in place so the blacks don't fear voting as I know they do in many of these states. George Allen epitomizes these racists credo and the good people of Virginia must reject him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Didn't We Know This Before?
Posted by: rae2012 on Sep 3, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm out here in California, so I don't really know the local skinny in Virginny. However, these openly-promoted links to racist groups as part of his election strategy should have been made common knowledge to all voters, via mainstream media. Or at least by his opponents campaign. And subsequent politcal stories about Allen should have made some reference to these ties - if only to indicate these were in the past. Did the citizens of VA just plain know and accept his underlying attitudes, do they share them or are they simply clueless?

If Allen hadn't made the 'macaca' slip of the tongue in a general political gathering - as opposed to a KKK meeting where it was OK - it would still not be a news topic. Until the bloggers weighed in, I never knew about the Confederate Flag and noose in his office. What the f*ck are the print journalists of today getting paid to do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Didn't We Know This Before? Posted by: carcinoid112
No Surprise!
Posted by: vangogh69 on Sep 3, 2006 5:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, really, Viriginia had the most slaves of all the states at one time. It makes since that decendents of these slaveholders might harbor racist tendencies. I'll go one further though...Unless an American (which, if we can cut the bullshit, is usually taken to mean "Heterosexual Christian White Protestant Male/Female") has grown up in an intergrated community and has taken steps to educate themselves about systemic and personalized racism, they are latently racist. I know, it's hard to hear, but it's the truth! Even so-called "liberals" are guilty. Many white americans remain latently racist because they don't even see themselves as "white," a social-political-historical myth (as genetically true as the earth is flat) which entails with it all the white privilidge oppression can afford. Yes, we have Ms. Rice in office signing up to blow up other brown people, so that's progress I guess? Americans living in metropolises may think all of america is like their city, with their faux "diversity" and successful "integrated communities," (can you say gentrification?) but I can assure you this country is made up of towns which didn't get the memo and remain as ass-backwards as ever before.

This country has never had a true dialogue on race (though there was a presidental commision on race, under LBJ I believe, which basically said the US is as racist as ever and will remain so until economic conditions are made equitable, counter to Capitalism, which means really NEVER!), nor has it even attempted to pay reparations to the decendents of slaves, so until that happens we shouldn't be surprised that bigots run for office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Surprise! PT.II Posted by: vangogh69
Education
Posted by: mazel on Sep 4, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The quality of public education in the US is poor; its entire structure and the way it's funded needs a complete overhaul. Can you imagine how different things would be in this country if education was the top priority? It doesn't take a genius to figure out that most of the people who are making important decisions that effect our daily lives would be out of work.

And that, in my mind, is why things are the way they are. The people in power benefit from our collective stupidity. It makes us easy to deceive, easy to manipulate, easy to control. This is the number-one threat to our democracy. It cannot work in an ill-informed, uneducated society. I don't see much hope for improvement in this situation. The quality of education has been declining steadily for at least 2 generations and this is reflected in the quality of our current government.

To any teachers reading this post: I don't hold you responsible for the poor quality of education. It has nothing to do with you. Public education needs a different approach but until it becomes a priority it will continue to be underfunded.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Allen needs to get back to his roots
Posted by: sarahk on Sep 4, 2006 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that George Allen has an African-American heritage. His mother is from Tunisia, a country in Northern Africa. George is actually a light-skinned African-American. I think he needs to embrace his heritage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Allen: Another OREO
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 4, 2006 5:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is not just white racism, it's also the many OREO's in the Republican party. The Condi's and Colin Powell's. George Allen is effectively part of this group himself. As soon as a few crumbs come to them, the OREO'S become very conservative and reactionary. They defy there own heritage and background believing by doing so they will advance their own careers. These guys just buttress the white racisits with this type of behavior and are part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: George Allen: Another OREO Posted by: Southern Gadfly
Mistake?
Posted by: sacha_arilad on Sep 4, 2006 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I´ve read so far, all I hear is Allen asserting that he made a ´mistake´. Did he NOT think it was a mistake when he or his aides drafted the speech? Did he NOT think it was a mistake when he said "welcome Macaca here" to "America and the real world of Virginia," and his audience hooted and hollered in support.

So when did he think it became a mistake. When he was caught out? If he was sincere, he should apologise to Sidarth in person and take time off to do charity work in India or some other Asian, Africa or South American nation. But then one wonders if he has the brain capacity for that.

In simple terms, Allen is a disgrace to the human race. His rascism reflects his inferiority. His bigotry, his stunted brain development. In simple terms, Allen - you are a stupid man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LORD OF THE COLORINGS
Posted by: Roverton on Sep 6, 2006 12:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are turning into Orcs.
Greedy, can't be reasoned with.
No idea they're mad.
Hungry all the time,

Never full.

Pack animals who
turn on their own
for being weak.

A debate about racism
brings them out.
They hate light on certain topics -
because they hate light.

Guilty before proven innoccent now.
Suspicious of motion, afraid of the still.
Is this who we are?
Would we know it if we were?

Not enough variance in DNA to
make another race between
one man or another.
A racist hates mankind.

We have fallen.
On knees bent for us.
No shame in our dreams.
No shame in our next crime.

How else would the Devil do it?
Selling chaos, door to door.
Our nobility is in all -
Not just the lucky few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Allen is an a*sh**e!
Posted by: MEL810 on Sep 9, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I said it when he was first running and I still say it! Allen is an a*sh**e!
Allen is the son of the ragehaolic ex-Redskins coach George Allen and is just as nasty a piece of work as his dad.
Jim Webb is way ahead of Allen in the polls and I hope he wins. I know THIS Virginian is voting for Webb and doing all she can to unseat Allen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement