Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Jungle For Meatpackers

By Eric Schlosser, The Nation. Posted September 5, 2006.


Today meatpacking workers have one of the lowest-paid manufacturing jobs in the United States--and one of the most dangerous.
Advertisement

This year marks the hundredth anniversary of Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle. Its depiction of unchecked greed and exploitation in the American meatpacking industry unfortunately remains relevant.

A few months ago the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a December 2000 ruling by an administrative law judge at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The case involved the behavior of the Smithfield Packing Company between 1992 and 1998 at its plant in Tar Heel, North Carolina--the largest hog slaughterhouse in the world. According to the appeals court, Smithfield had violated a wide variety of labor laws and created "an atmosphere of intimidation and coercion" in order to prevent workers at the plant from joining the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) union.

Here are some of the details: Smithfield threatened to close the plant if workers voted to join the UFCW. It harassed workers who supported the union and paid other workers to spy on them. It forced union supporters to distribute anti-union literature. It fired workers for backing the union. It asked workers to lie during their testimony to the NLRB and refused to hand over company videotapes that the government had subpoenaed. During a union election in 1997, two UFCW supporters were beaten and arrested by security officers and deputy sheriffs. The chief of security at the slaughterhouse--who also served as a local deputy sheriff--carried handcuffs and a gun on the job. Between 2000 and 2005 he ran a company police force, operating in the plant and staffed with other deputy sheriffs, that arrested almost a hundred workers, including UFCW supporters.

One of the most remarkable things about Smithfield's behavior is that it was criticized by a branch of the federal government. Since George W. Bush took office in January 2001, the meatpacking industry has wielded more power than at any other time since the early twentieth century. The Bush Administration has worked closely with the industry to weaken food safety and worker safety rules and to make union organizing more difficult. The US Department of Agriculture now offers a textbook example of a regulatory agency controlled by the industry it's supposed to regulate.

The current chief of staff at the USDA was, until 2001, the chief lobbyist for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. Meanwhile, the sort of abuses criticized in the NLRB's Smithfield decision are still being committed. A recent Human Rights Watch report on the US meatpacking industry found "systematic human rights violations." Lance Compa, the author of the report, teaches labor law at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations. Compa interviewed many workers at the Smithfield plant in Tar Heel. What's happening there, he says, is "a modern-day version of The Jungle."

While visiting Chicago slaughterhouses for research in 1904, Upton Sinclair met Eastern European immigrants employed at dangerous, dirty, low-wage jobs. Union organizers and injured workers were being harassed and fired. The publication of The Jungle two years later caused a public uproar--about the widespread contamination of meat, not the mistreatment of meatpacking workers. The book helped President Theodore Roosevelt gain passage of two important pieces of legislation, the Meat Inspection Act and the Pure Food and Drug Act.

But it didn't accomplish much for meatpacking workers. Conditions gradually improved in the nation's slaughterhouses, thanks to years of labor organizing. The industry fought hard against unions, pitting one Eastern European immigrant group against another and recruiting African-Americans as strikebreakers. By the 1930s, however, most of the industry was unionized. And by the 1950s meatpacking workers had one of the highest-paid manufacturing jobs in the United States. It wasn't always a pleasant job, but it provided a solid, middle-class income.

In 1970 the typical American meatpacking worker earned about 20 percent more than the typical factory worker. Today he or she earns about 20 percent less. Enormous changes have swept through the industry over the past thirty years, as big companies swallowed up small ones, moved slaughterhouses from urban areas (where unions were strong) to rural areas (where unions were weak), imported poor immigrants from Mexico and ruthlessly cut wages by as much as 50 percent. Today meatpacking workers have one of the lowest-paid manufacturing jobs in the United States--and one of the most dangerous. At a modern slaughterhouse hundreds of people work at a furious pace, close to one another, wielding sharp knives. The most common injury is a laceration, as workers stab themselves or a worker nearby.


Digg!

Eric Schlosser is the author of 'Fast Food Nation' and 'Reefer Madness.'

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Election year?
Posted by: TT2 on Sep 5, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes! Lets just blame it all on the "evil immigrants" What a great theme for election year!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lection year? Posted by: harris
Enforce immigration laws & worker safety laws!
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Sep 5, 2006 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course knee-jerk liberals will be freaked out at the thought of enforcing immigration laws.

So will the bosses they loathe -- but when's the last time they ever thought about that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

example
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 5, 2006 1:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another example of criminal behaviour by the Bushies and their misguided supporters. It is an immoral situation where workers are routinely injured and grossly underpaid. The Bushies criminal gang is still ganging up on American workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mass Immigration & The FakeLeft Political Religion is to blame for this
Posted by: rebel_pig on Sep 5, 2006 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't blame this on Bush and the GOP. This started in the late 80s and continued into the 90s and 00s.

THe reason for this is mass immigration, which is supported not only by the GOP Right, but also by you democrats---the Fake Left.

YOU are the ones who collaborated with the Right to cause mass immigration of desperate 3rd worlders.

YOU are the ones to blame for ruining America's industrial job, Yes, the Right led the way, but YOU were right there with your race guilt, pushing it on people that they were racists if they were against the mass immigration ruination of America's wage support.

You fakelefters were the pull to the Right's push. And now you wanna put it all off on Bush. You friggin religious hypocrites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes, Pat, He's really that dumb!!! Posted by: Againstthewindwalking
» RE: Funny Posted by: Shehova
Meatpacking, Corporate Concentration, and US Labor
Posted by: yellow on Sep 5, 2006 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things that have made the big four meatpackers who control over 80% of the beef market and 50% of the poultry market is the incredible pace of industrial corporate concentration since 1980-the real purpose of the Reagan Revolution. In 1973, nearly 800 federally inspected meat packing plants served under 10% of the market with many of the top non-supervisory workers earning $30,000/year. Today about 18 mega plants fed mostly by big industrial feed lots serve over 80% of the market for beef and are controlled by the top four corporations. The effect on Labor has been rapid deunionization and wage deceleration. Today most of the workers are Latino and Asian immigrants who earn between $6.00 and $8.00/hr. The plants have also been ruralized far away from the urban work forces that were once employed there such as the Union Stockyards in Chicago which were closed in 1972. The companies continued operations elsewhere. The consequences for unionized labor has been disasterous as the blog shows. The UFCW has a hard time regaining lost ground and meatpacking is one of the least unionized industries of all the old heavy industries which once had high union density. Ruralization and illegal immigration is not the only problem but has helped employers bust unions which were being busted even before the immigrants came to work. There are many work safety issues and meat packing has a higher than average rate of industrial accidents because there are no unions to oppose speedups. Other unsafe conditions include exposure to toxic cleaning substances like highly concentrated ammonia. High corporate concentration has made the companies stronger against the unions. The meat packers also have friends in government. Meat packing industry concentration has harmed the ranchers who get per head of cattle and the environment which suffers pollution from manure overloads and various chemical concentrations which get into the soil and water table. Consumers are also harmed by high monopoly prices for beef. All in all, meat packing concentrations has harmed society in general!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, but it IS the influx of illegals that made it this way
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 5, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live close to a large IBP meatpacking plant in NE Nebraska. During the 60's and 70's it provided a great middle-class unionized job for folks around here. It was especially good for farmers and students needing a summer job. Sure, it was and still is dirty work, but during this time it did not have a reputation as being especially dangerous.

Came the 1980's--the company started a move to cut wages and benefits. The union went on strike, and it was busted by bringing in busloads of illegals or whatever. Today the job pays 40% in real dollars of what it used to pay, the line has been boosted from 60 to 200 animals/hour, and the union is only a memory. The trailer parks that surround the plant are so dangerous that the local police are afraid to go in there because of the Mexican gangs, the Vietnamese gangs, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That AMI meeting celebrating Upton Sinclair is REALLY sick!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 5, 2006 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The AMI meeting/propaganda deal mentioned at the end of the article is really the worst! My God, these people are the worst! What liars and hypocrites!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am sure... Posted by: Allison
It's the government, which is the same as saying it's the companies - cause they're one and the same
Posted by: drSooz on Sep 5, 2006 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another good read on this is Gail Eisnitz's book SLAUGHTERHOUSE. She explores in great, sickening, and sad detail how the workers AND the food animals are treated. It's the companies fault and our government's fault for making it so easy for the companies. There is a simple - tho not easy - solution: don't eat meat. Or, if you must eat meat, only buy free-range, grass-fed, humanely raised cows/pigs/chickens. Hit 'em in the pocketbook, which is the only 'hit' they'll notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fighting for Crumbs at the Table
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 5, 2006 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, once again the champions of jobs in fast food restaurants and gas stations are blaming illegal aliens for poor wages and working conditions in slaughterhouses. What's next, blaming illegal aliens for a lack of jobs in car washes? How pathetic. Bush and company have gutted the laws that protect workers and the right to unionize. Priority number one is corporate profits. Do you know where all the good manufacturing jobs went? Yes, I suppose illegal aliens took them too, right? No, it's called "free trade," NAFTA, CAPTA, etc. So here we are, stuck blaming some impoverished illegal aliens for getting more crumbs at the table then we think we should be getting. I got news for you, all the rules have been fixed, fixed by the owners, by the corporate rulers and oligarchs. Meanwhile, the rich get richer, at the expense of the poor who are divided between themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oops! You did it again! Posted by: Pat Kittle
» EXPAND YOUR MIND Posted by: sofla100
Who cares?
Posted by: TWilliams on Sep 6, 2006 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is a great nation because anyone can work hard and rise above the "Slaughterhouses".

Everyone here can waste their breath and blame the factory owners, fast food, Bush, and Clinton (he did love McDonalds!) but the real truth is that these people are not STUCK in such jobs. This is a free market economy - if they don't like the conditions they can leave and find another job elsewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who cares? Posted by: yellow
You'll never get it, so go back to your redwood hollow
Posted by: AdamG on Sep 7, 2006 11:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Figure it out. Even though there are only 300 million americans, they use over 25% of the resources. There are 6+ billion. 5% uses 25%. 1 american=18 of them overbreeding wannabe moving here immigrants. "They" are not having that many kids. Impact wise, having 1 kid is overbreeding=overconsuming for americans. Americans also are the ones setting the bad example. Seems like maybe we just need to deport the americans to space, and every thing will be peachy.

Get over it, if "we" don't all get along and share our toys with everyone else, then we get punished. It's a lesson most of us get taught in first grade. Many of us, especially in america, still haven't learned it. If overpopulation and a shithole for a planet is what we get for punishment, then so be it. All your are doing is whining saying "he started it..."

It sounds like you are also pissed because you don't understand those "overbreeding" migrants. Well I don't suppose you or your ancestors bothered with learning to speak Pomo, Wailiaki,Wintu, Wappo, Yuki, Lakota, Inuit, Tzetzal, or any of the other thousands of languages spoken in the americas previous to colonialisation.

I still think you need to get back on the boat and go home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eco-Eating
Posted by: CyberBrook on Sep 8, 2006 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please visit Eco-Eating : Eating as if the Earth Matters for more info and lots of useful links.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

world population growth rates actually declining
Posted by: yellow on Sep 9, 2006 1:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
World population growth peaked in the decades of the 1950s and 1960s at just over 18% and then began a slow descent despite growth in absolute terms. Over the decades of the 1970s and 80s the growth rate went down to about 16% then 12% in the 1990s and now about 10%. It is expected to drop further as the 21st century presses on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Pat Kittle don't committ suicide just yet...
Posted by: yellow on Sep 9, 2006 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's hope for those vexed by the ghost of Malthus:

www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3560433.stm#graphic

check it out!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]