Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is Wal-Mart Big Green or Big Mean?

By Liza Featherstone, The Nation. Posted September 1, 2006.


Wal-Mart wants to bring organic food to the masses, but the retail giant's aggressive ways could end up doing more harm than good.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Liza Featherstone

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A laughing baby is covered in baby food. He's making a gushy mess, as babies do, but having a grand time. A magic word reassures us -- before we've had a chance to worry -- that the food itself is wholesome. That word, of course, is "organic." More surprising, to many viewers of this advertisement, will be the origin of this virtuous feast: Wal-Mart.

This summer, the mega-retailer launched a multimillion-dollar ad campaign with an irresistible promise: "Introducing Organics at the Wal-Mart price." The commercial, which cannily plays to mothers' worries about how pesticides and additives may affect their children's health, has run on network and cable TV; a print version will appear in Parenting, Real Simple, Self and Cooking Light. Already one of the nation's leading organics vendors, Wal-Mart announced this past spring its intention to enter the market far more aggressively, to double its inventory and eventually offer organics at only 10 percent above the price of conventional food.

Food bearing the government's organic label can be, for low- and middle-income shoppers, prohibitively expensive. That's why, to many observers, an "organic Wal-Mart" represents the democratization of healthier -- and better-tasting -- food. Bob Scowcroft of the Organic Farming Research Foundation argues, too, that environmentalists should cheer Wal-Mart's move, which will "turn hundreds of thousands of acres" now being farmed conventionally to organic. "Think of the tonnage of toxins and carcinogens which will disappear from the earth," he says.

Scowcroft also points to research by the Swiss government showing that organic farming can reduce global warming -- actually drawing nitrogen and carbon from the atmosphere. Like the retailer's push for fuel-efficient trucking, Wal-Mart's entry into the organic sector could turn out to be another example of how one decision by this company -- however market-driven -- might do tremendous good, simply because of its scale.

But while there are potential upsides to Wal-Mart's move, it also offers plenty of reasons to worry. To advocates of local economies, like Judy Wicks, founder of Philadelphia's White Dog Cafe and co-chair of the Sustainable Business Network of Greater Philadelphia, an organic Wal-Mart could do "more harm than good" because of the changes it will bring about in the organic food industry. For example, she cites Wal-Mart's likely impact on many small farmers. In other industries Wal-Mart's aggressive competition has proved devastating to small producers, from TV manufacturers to conventional pork farmers.

Though Wal-Mart, like Whole Foods, has agreed to source some products locally, most family-scale organic farmers will not supply big-box retailers directly. But many farmers will nonetheless struggle to meet Wal-Mart's price, in order to supply competing retailers or simply hang on to customers. "Every farmer has to compete because Wal-Mart is in every market," explains Mark Kastel, senior farm policy analyst at the Cornucopia Institute, a progressive research group that advocates for small farmers. "From an economic justice standpoint," he adds, Wal-Mart's plan to go more aggressively organic is "a disaster" because it could prove ruinous for so many family farms.

Some of the concern over small farmers may be sentimental, a remnant of our national identity as a land of Jeffersonian citizen-yeomen. And some detect, in the progressive reaction to Wal-Mart's organic ambitions, a whiff of countercultural cliqueishness. Gary Hirshberg, president of Stonyfield Farm, which supplies organic yogurt to Wal-Mart, is a former hippie who lived on an organic solar- and wind-powered farm in the 1960s and '70s. He dismisses Wal-Mart critics in the organic movement as "activists who don't want to think of organic as a segment. They think of it as a lifestyle." To Hirshberg, organic Wal-Mart is a sign of the movement's success, and those who don't like it are elitist purists, dedicated to their own marginality.

But there are unsentimental reasons to root for small farmers in this drama. They are important to a progressive vision, partly because they are more likely to be farming organic out of principle than a large corporation is and thus more inclined not to cut corners and compromise standards. People who live on their farms with their families also have a compelling incentive to treat the land better.

Regina Beidler is a Mennonite who lives with her dairy-farmer husband, Brent, and 8-year-old daughter, Erin, on 145 acres with forty cows in Randolph Center, Vermont. Because the Beidlers farm organically -- which as defined by the Department of Agriculture means no pesticides, petroleum-based fertilizers or sewage-sludge-based fertilizers -- Erin roams the farm freely (her job is to push the button on the grain elevator). "It's reassuring to know she isn't being exposed to those [toxic] substances," says her mother. "It's much more child-friendly."

Perhaps even more convincingly, as groups like the Organic Consumers Association point out, transporting food long distances is a staggering waste of energy and contributes to global warming. According to research by Brian Halweil of the Worldwatch Institute, our food typically travels 1,500 to 2,500 miles to reach our plate, 25 percent farther than in 1980. By the time we sit down to eat it, a meal from a conventional grocery store has used four to seventeen times more petroleum than a meal made from local ingredients.

While Wal-Mart officials have expressed concern about the "food miles" issue, industry observers predict that most of Wal-Mart's produce will travel significant distances -- Chile, Kenya and China are some of the likeliest low-cost sources, according to Mary Hendrickson, director of the University of Missouri's Food Circles Networking Project -- raising confusing questions about whether organic Wal-Mart will, on balance, hurt or help the planet. (Just to confuse the environmental issue still more, Bob Scowcroft points out that converting all those acres in China will clean up a lot of groundwater there, which is obviously good for the Chinese.)

Most small organic farmers interviewed for this article believed that in organics, as in many other sectors, Wal-Mart's low prices would, ultimately, mean lower standards. Stonyfield Farm's Hirshberg, who has had many discussions with Wal-Mart officials about the company's commitment to organics, says Wal-Mart does not plan to lower its price by lowering standards; rather, he says, Wal-Mart is committed to delivering the savings through efficiencies within its own system. But Wal-Mart's behavior as a major player in the organic dairy industry has already suggested otherwise. It has also provided a window on how the company will treat small organic farmers: just fine, until they can no longer provide the lowest possible price.

When Wal-Mart began selling organic milk, one of its first suppliers was Organic Valley, a cooperative of small farmers committed to organic principles. Organic Valley farmers, including Regina Beidler, were proud to be reaching Wal-Mart's customers, people like themselves who were struggling to make ends meet. But Organic Valley faced a milk shortage, so when the co-op found itself outpriced by a competitor, Horizon, which is owned by Dean Foods, the farmers decided not to engage in a price war to stay on the Wal-Mart shelf but to continue supplying the smaller food stores that had long formed the backbone of their customer base. "We didn't want to make compromises," says Organic Valley CEO and farmer George Siemon, meaning that the farmers needed to get a fair price while maintaining their product's integrity.

Horizon, which controls 55 percent of the organic dairy market, meets Wal-Mart's low price in part by providing appalling conditions for its cows. The Cornucopia Institute's Mark Kastel, first reached for this article as he was standing on Horizon's 4,000-cow Idaho feedlot, says the cows were "standing in 90-degree heat. No shade, no water. These animals are living very short lives." (To be considered "organic," animals -- whether they are raised for meat, milk or eggs -- must be given some access to the outdoors. It is an irony of the bureaucracy and inequity surrounding federal certification that by following the letter if not the spirit of such regulations -- that is, for some of their lives Horizon's cows are outside, even if they have no room to move around -- Horizon can call its milk organic, while many small farmers, whose cows roam freely and munch on grass, cannot; in many cases the farmers can't afford the expense of the certification process, or are put off by the paperwork.)

The Organic Consumers Association has urged shoppers to boycott Horizon. As savvy consumers learn that sometimes the organic label tells an incomplete story, Organic Valley stands to benefit. "Organic Valley has long been built on the idea that family farming is a better way to give care to animals and the land," Siemon says diplomatically. "Consumers have a hard time believing that large factory farms are really organic."

To be sure, some family-scale organic farmers are benefiting from Wal-Mart's entry into the industry. Horizon buys at least half its milk from hundreds of small-scale farmers, as even a dogged critic like Kastel, author of a report called "Maintaining the Integrity of Organic Milk," acknowledges. And while Organic Valley isn't supplying Wal-Mart directly anymore, some Organic Valley milk does end up, much transformed, in the Wal-Mart customer's shopping cart: Stonyfield Farm buys milk from the cooperative to make organic yogurt. Says Stonyfield's Hirshberg: "If you're serious and sincere about family farms, then your ultimate goal is to be in Wal-Mart, to be where food is sold."

Still, the Horizon/Wal-Mart alliance is potentially ominous for family-scale dairy farmers, because, as Kastel points out, "there's a shortage today, but a year from now," as producers rush to meet the demands of big retailers like Wal-Mart, "you could have a surplus." A milk surplus could erode the organic premium and drive many small organic dairy farmers into bankruptcy, just as it has wiped out many of their conventional neighbors. Organic farmers, especially in the Northeast, are already in a precarious situation because of high fuel, grain and transportation costs.

Travis Forgues, a second-generation farmer in Alburg, Vermont, the state's farthest-northwest town, milks eighty grass-fed cows. A 33-year-old father of three young children, he speaks for many small farmers when he says, "If we didn't have the organic market, my dad and I would have been out of here long ago." On the danger of a surplus fueled by demand from Wal-Mart and other big-box stores, Forgues says, "Anyone who's not worried about what's going to happen is crazy."

With Wal-Mart on the scene, the strength of alternative and local economic institutions will determine whether small farmers like Forgues survive. With 871 farmers and growing, Organic Valley, the largest organic farmers' cooperative in the country, is still going strong even without Wal-Mart's business, maintaining farmer control while still distributing on an impressive scale. (In the grocery store on my corner in New York City, which is not a natural-food store or a food co-op, Organic Valley milk is sold right next to Horizon, and that's the case in stores all over the country.)

Farmers agree that the co-op model is critical, helping them maintain some power in an increasingly concentrated market. "The farmer has to be in the driver's seat," says Forgues. Because of the organic milk shortage and the Organic Valley cooperative, he continues to get a fair price and has survived a difficult season far more easily than most of his farmer neighbors. Of Wal-Mart, he says, "We're not going to cut our price so we can get onto that shelf. We have to make sure farmers don't get removed from the process, as happened in the conventional food market."

In a nod to the savvy consumer's growing interest in nearby food, Organic Valley is in the process of regionalizing many of its operations, so that even though farmers in twenty-three states belong to the co-op, customers in New England buying Organic Valley milk will be, increasingly, buying from New England farmers. Farmers' markets, which are growing in popularity, will also be critical institutions in the organic Wal-Mart era.

Jim Goodman, a Wisconsin dairy farmer who tends 400 certified-organic acres with his brother, sells to a local cheesemaker (as well as directly to customers through mail order) but also relies on the weekly farmers' market in Madison, where he sells beef. He doesn't think Wal-Mart is going to affect his business. "People who come to the farmers' market are shopping there because they want to deal directly with the farmer," he says. "They want to meet the person who raised it, put it in their hand. When they get home they can say, 'This came from Mike, this came from Jim.' When you're sitting down to dinner that makes so much difference. I'd be surprised if they would go to Wal-Mart just because it's cheaper."

For local food to become more than a niche market and begin to transform our relationship to the environment, however, energy is going to have to be a lot more expensive. For the majority of Americans to have the incentive to buy local, the cost of food transport would have to reflect its true environmental costs. Many local food advocates speak -- half with alarm, half wishfully -- of "peak oil," the notion that we are running out of oil and will soon be forced to grow our own food and cooperate with our neighbors. That neo-primitivist scenario, if it ever comes to pass, is not going to arrive nearly quickly enough to substitute for the necessary work of persuading Americans to change our lifestyles, and advocating policies that conserve energy.

"Consumers have to be more educated," says Goodman. He thinks it's important to tell people why the prices are higher: Organic is not overpriced; rather, conventional food is cheap because its costs are passed along to the environment, small farmers and the health of those who eat it. "If people can't afford to buy organic," he says, "it's because they are not paid enough in their jobs, and don't have health insurance."

That, Goodman insists, should be part of a broader economic justice agenda: A living wage should allow a person to buy responsibly grown, healthy food for her family. "With organic food," he explains, "there's no hidden cost." It's also true that at farmers' markets and roadside stands, organic food is often cheaper than in stores, because there's no profiteering middleman.

Taking their case to the shopper, Organic Valley farmers like Travis Forgues have been traveling the country on speaking tours. The Organic Consumers Association is working to create a domestic fair-trade group, whose label would assure the consumer that food was produced in a way that was environmentally and socially responsible -- giving an edge to smaller, more conscientious producers over Dean Foods. With the goal, too, of making local organic produce affordable to the poorest Wal-Mart shoppers -- those who will probably never be able to afford a meal at the White Dog Cafe, which runs around $50 -- the OCA is also working to broaden a program making it easier for farmers' markets to accept food stamps.

Many organic farmers are social activists and idealists who care about the environment, animal rights and economic justice. But many are also entrepreneurial -- and that's how they will survive the new era of big-box organic. The challenge Wal-Mart poses, says Bob Scowcroft, is "to get consumers who discover organics at the Wal-Mart to get out of their car and to the farmers' market."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liza Featherstone is a New York City-based journalist. She is the author, most recently, of "Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers' Rights At Wal-Mart" (Basic).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
end
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 1, 2006 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To end global warming or not to end global warming, that is the question. Near to consumers production is key to what needs to be done in agriculture and other sectors. If WalMart cannot buy and sell near to consumers then it will continue to be part of the problem instead of part of the solution. It remains to be seen whether we can make a big enough reduction in global warming to be able to survive in decency. Stay tuned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be thankful.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 1, 2006 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In New Jersey, Farmers' Markets flourish along the highways to the seashore. Because it's a high traffic area the prices are comparable to our local supermarket even though the farmer doesn't pay shipping. This may be because the location makes the land taxes high. The big draw is freshness. Any vegetable that isn't eaten as close as possible to the time it's picked loses flavor. That is the reason that I grew vegetables in the city. So local farms have a time advantage.

To fault Wal-Mart for overproduction problems that may arise seems to me to be unfair. There is always a possibility of over-production by small farmers. If the price is high one year for a crop, the next year farmers will plant more of that crop and the price will fall. A canny farmer takes this into consideration.

Be thankful that healthful food will become available to more people. Life is a series of trade-offs.
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the true cost of organic....
Posted by: Farmertim on Sep 1, 2006 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was hidden in this piece.
When you order wholesale from a organic supplier you get the suggested retail price.
What you see in the Organic store or Co/op is suggested and then some.
As a former partner in a small on farm organic store that carried a large selection of organic items we sold at 10% to 15% over cost, not over suggested retail.
That brought in produce and most ofther items within 12 to 18% of conventional.
A very easy transition for the consumer to make.
Yep Wal-mart is bringing it in cheaper, but all they have to do is sell it at 10% over cost verses the 35 to 60% over cost you now see in stores at suggested retail.
I'm no fan of Wal-mart, but I am no fan of stores getting greedy when I see the additional markup on the organic goods.
The big concern is overseas organics that may not be organic that Wal-mart will focus on to drive down the price.
But true foodies are already looking to the source of their food which cuts out most retailers anyway.
Just another side note...farmers and producers of organic when selling to processors only receive 15 to 21% of the store shelf price, no different than the conventional producer in the traditonal market.
Yes organic brings more income but only a small piece of the pie.
FarmerTim

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let there be labels
Posted by: antiapathy on Sep 1, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My supermarket has recently been flooded with a new generic label organic milk. I wondered how they could be so much cheaper than the O.V. milk until I read about how Horizon treats its dairy cows. I would imagine that this generic milk comes from animals in similar a similar condition. We need to establish a new labeling standard to let consumers know that their products come from a healthy environment rather than a factory farm. It would have to be completely independent though, as the government is loathe to inform consumers that their mcnuggets come from the filthiest conditions imaginable. And the certification process would have to be affordable. I think it should be based on a sliding scale tied to the size of the farm.
And furthermore, stores should label their products with how far they've traveled.

I just don't understand why the organic industry can't get its act together and create a set of meaningful, voluntary labels. I think consumers want to know these things, and organic family farms are only hurting themselves by not lobbying to get that information to the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buy local or grow your own. Living foods don't transport well.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Sep 1, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living foods such as carrots, mellons, corn, beans ... don't transport well and the vitamin content goes down over time. I fully support urban farms but with urban sprawl, they have become too far away in many cities. A rule I use is that if I can't bicycle to it, it is too far away. Local farmers markets were close and I could go out and pick my own vegatables and fruits but they have dissappeared due to the rapid development in the Phoenix metro area.

My parents were the WW II generation and all of my life at home in the midwest, we had a "victory garden". We had fresh vegetables for the summer and fall and 8 fruit trees in the back yard (alas, most of the art of preparation, cooking, canning and storage seem to have been lost at the end of my grandparents generation and the knowledge hasn't been past on because of convenience foods). I have continued this practice and although it may be expensive, I know the food is really organic (many foods labeled organic isn't because of industry watering down the standards). Heirloom vegatables that don't transport at all are available and they are in a class by themselves. The fruits, vegatables, dairy, eggs and chicken that I can't produce came from the farmers market that used to be in surrounding farm areas but they are now gone. Living in the southwest, "development" has eliminated most farms.

Urban farms are an outstanding option, but once again, the travel time to the farms is so far out that I'm burning a tank full of gas for the round trip (Phoenix is as bad as LA now). Mesquite bean flour is awesome compared to other flour options but needs a hammer mill that is far away so I have to throw away 100+ lbs of beans a year (the been pods taste like honey).

My greatest hope would be for city planners to get a grasp on sustainabiliy of the local city or town. I support local growers and industries in spite of higher costs because I know that it is in the best interest of the community, regardless of size, in the long term. You know the food is organic when you know work in an urban garden or know the farmer and his fields that participate in farmers markets. The same is not true of large grocery chains since the regulations have watered down requirements so severly that nearly anything can be considered organic and quality fresh fruits and vegetables don't travel over long distances well. I haven't tasted good milk (used to coat the glass), eggs (they don't even stand up anymore), tomatoes (), or potatoes (skin used to fall right off and tasted earthy) or real fresh buttermilk (last produced 45 years ago and isn't sour), from a grocery store of any kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zen
Posted by: Zen on Sep 1, 2006 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal-Mart has been the devil for years. Any honest effort they make to turn things around should be recognized. Yes, they're going to make a profit. But that's what companies do. If Lee Scott pulls off his green vision for Wal-Mart, it will position Wal-Mart to be the world leader in the corporate green revolution. I say hurah! There will certainly be bumps in the road, and the devil won't be exorcised overnight. But what I am reading lately is encouraging. They at least deserve a chance. Who knows... In 30 years we may all be proud to have the new green Wal-Mart in our communities. Never say never.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal Mart will take over the US, it has support from both sides of the isle.
Posted by: MTreich on Sep 1, 2006 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wal Mart is bigger than us all. This family business killer has not only strong Republican support but also some support on the Democrat side. Hillary Clinton used to serve on Wal Mart's board of directors as a paid member.

I don't know what we can do except protest and educate communities where Wal Mart is thinking of going. Currently they are planning a super sized wal mart in the small town of Sanger, CA. It will be potentially devastating for the already struggling small town. I recommend people research this for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

87% of U.S. households shop at Wal-Mart
Posted by: rk_tech68fl on Sep 1, 2006 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..so this is basically a marketing ploy to lure the remaining 13%(probably the demographic that reads). The average Wal-mart generates 10,000 car trips per day and their massive parking lots produce enough polluted stormwater runoff to be cited by the EPA in 9 different states. They use $1.1 billion/yr. in electricity cooling their stores. Yet somehow, they think organic milk is going to make me shop there..?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Wal-Mart Big Green or Big Mean?
Posted by: fork on Sep 1, 2006 9:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Mean.
Next question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement