comments_imageCOMMENTS: 393

Where Bush's Arrogance Has Taken Us

An illegal war, a long list of eroded rights, and a country run by and for the benefit of corporate campaign donors -- all courtesy of the imperial presidency.
August 23, 2006  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
[Editor's Note: The August issue of The Hightower Lowdown contains a poster-sized chart detailing the many grievances, lies and miscues of the Bush Administration. Below is the story in text form, you can also download the full poster from The Hightower Lowdown.]

During his gubernatorial days in Texas, George W let slip a one-sentence thought that unintentionally gave us a peek into his political soul. In hindsight, it should've been loudly broadcast all across our land so people could've absorbed it, contemplated its portent?and roundly rejected the guy's bid for the presidency. On May 21, 1999, reacting to some satirical criticism of him, Bush snapped: "There ought to be limits to freedom."

Gosh, so many freedoms to limit, so little time! But in five short years, the BushCheneyRummy regime has made remarkable strides toward dismembering the genius of the Founders, going at our Constitution and Bill of Rights like famished alligators chasing a couple of poodles.

Forget about such niceties as separation of powers, checks and balances (crucial to the practice of democracy), the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, and open government-these guys are on an autocratic tear. Whenever they've been challenged (all too rarely), they simply shout "war on terror," "commander-in-chief," "support our troops," "executive privilege," "I'm the decider," or some other slam-the-door political phrase designed to silence any opposition. Indeed, opponents are branded "enemies" who must be demonized, personally attacked, and, if possible, destroyed. Bush's find-the-loopholes lawyers assert that a president has the right to lie (even about going to war), to imprison people indefinitely (without charges, lawyers, hearings, courts, or hope), to torture people, to spy on Americans without court or congressional review, to prosecute reporters who dare to report, to rewrite laws on executive whim?and on and on.

Here, we are pleased to give you a sense of the enormity of what Bush & Company are doing under the cloak of war and executive privilege in a handy-dandy poster format.

The War President
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
-George W., August 2004
  • Number of Americans killed in Bush's Iraq war as of August 2006: 2577

  • What Bush press flack Tony Snow said the day the total number of American dead reached 2,500: "It's a number"

  • Number of Americans killed since Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" on May 1, 2003: 2,438

  • Number of Americans wounded (a vague term that includes such horrors as brain damage, limb blasted off, eyes blown out, psyche shattered, etc.) in Bush's war:
    • Official count: 18,777
    • Independent count: up to 48,000

  • Estimated number of Iraqi civilians (men, women, and children) killed in Bush's war since Saddam Hussein was ousted: 38,960

  • For Iraqis, the bloodiest month of the war so far: June 2006 (more than 100 civilians killed per day)

  • Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmit's advice to Iraqis who see TV reports of innocent civilians being killed by occupying troops: "Change the channel."

  • Percent of Iraqis who want American troops to leave: 82

  • Stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction found in Iraq since Bush committed Americans to war in 2003 on the basis that Saddam had and was about to use WMDs: 0

  • Number of nations in the world: 192

  • Number that joined Bush's "Coalition of the Willing" (COW) to invade Iraq: 48
    (The list includes such military powers as Angola, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Latvia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau, Romania, Solomon Islands, and Uganda.)

  • Number of COW nations that actually sent any troops to Iraq: 39
    (Of these, 32 sent fewer than 1,000 troops. Many sent no fighting units, deploying only engineers, trainers, humanitarian units, and other noncombat personnel.)


  • Number of the 39 COW nations contributing troops that have since withdrawn them: 17
    (An additional 7 have announced plans to withdraw all or part of their contingents this year.)

  • Number of COW troops in Iraq: 150,000

  • Number of these that are U.S. troops: 139,000

  • Number of White House officials and cabinet members who have any of their immediate family in Bush's war: 0


Follow the Money
We're dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon."
-"Howling Paul" Wolfowitz, Deputy Defense Secretary, in testimony to Congress, March 2003
  • The official White House claim before the invasion of what the war and occupation would cost U.S. taxpayers: $50 billion

  • As of July 2006, the total amount appropriated by Congress for Bush's ongoing war and occupation: $295,634,921,248

  • Current Pentagon spending per month in Iraq: $8 billion (or $185,185.19 per minute)

  • Assuming all troops return home by 2010, the projected "real costs" for the war: More than $1 trillion
    (includes veterans' pay and medical costs, interest on the billions Bush has borrowed to pay for his war, etc.)


Bonus Stat!
  • Annual salary of Stuart Baker, hired by the Bushites to be the White House "Director for Lessons Learned": $106,641

  • Number of lessons that Bush appears to have learned: 0


The Imperial Presidency
"I'm the commander -- see, I don't need to explain -- I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."
George W., August, 2002.
Matt Wuerker


Signing Statements

When signing a particular congressional act into law, a few presidents have occasionally issued a "signing statement" to clarify their understanding of what Congress intended. These have not had the force of law and have been used discreetly in the past.

Very quietly, however, Bush has radically increased both the number and reach of these statements, essentially asserting that the president can arbitrarily decide which laws he will obey.

  • Number of signing statements issued by Bush as of July 2006: more than 800
    (This is more than the combined total of all 42 previous presidents.)

  • A few examples of congressionally passed laws he has effectively annulled through these extralegal signing statements:
    • a ban against torture of prisoners by the U.S. military

    • a requirement that the FBI periodically report to Congress on how it is using the Patriot Act to search our homes and secretly seize people's private papers

    • a ban against storage in military databases of intelligence about Americans that was obtained illegally

    • a directive for the executive branch to transmit scientific information to Congress "uncensored and without delay" when requested

  • Provision of the Constitution clearly stating that Congress alone has the power "to make all laws": Article 1, Section 8

  • Provision of the Constitution clearly stating that the president "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed": Article 2, Section 3

  • Name of the young lawyer in the Reagan administration who wrote a 1986 strategy memo on how to pervert the use of signing statements in order to concentrate more power in the executive branch, as Bush is now doing: Samuel Alito, named to the U.S. Supreme Court by Bush this year


National Security Letters

These are secret executive writs that the infamous 2001 Patriot Act authorizes the FBI to issue to public libraries, internet firms, banks, and others. Upon receiving an NSL, the institution or firm is required to turn over any private records it holds on you, me, or whomever the agents have chosen to search.

Who authorizes the FBI to issue these secret writs? The FBI itself.

  • Surely the agents have to get a search warrant, a grand jury subpoena, or a court's approval? No

  • But to issue an NSL, an agent must show probable cause that the person being searched has committed some crime, right? No

  • Well, don't officials have to inform citizens that their records are being seized so they can defend themselves or protest? No

  • Number of NSLs issued by various FBI offices last year alone: 9,254


NSA Eavesdropping

In 2001, Bush issued a secret order for the National Security Agency to begin vacuuming up massive numbers of telephone and internet exchanges by U.S. citizens, illegally seizing this material without any judicial approval or informing Congress, as required by law.

  • Number of Americans who have had their phone and internet communications taken by NSA: Just about everyone!
    (NSA is tapping into the entire database of long-distance calls and internet messages run through AT&T and probably other companies as well.)

  • In May of this year, the Justice Department abruptly halted an internal investigation that was trying to uncover the name of the top officials who had authorized NSA's warrantless, unconstitutional program. Who killed this probe, which was requested by Congress? George W himself! (He directed NSA simply to refuse security clearances for the department's legal investigators.)

  • What happened to NSA Director Michael Hayden, who was the key architect of Bush's illegal eavesdropping program and the one who would've formally denied clearances to Justice Department investigators? In May, Bush promoted him to head the CIA.

  • This past May, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales warned that journalists who report on NSA's spy program could be prosecuted under the antiquated Espionage Act of 1917.

  • Times in U.S. history this act has been used to go after the press: 0

  • Margin by which the U.S. House in 1917 voted down an amendment to make the Espionage Act apply to journalists: 184-144


Interesting Fact

The New York Times reported this June that Bush was running another spy program. This one was snooping through international banking records, including millions of bank transactions done by innocent Americans. George reacted angrily to the exposure, branding the Times report "disgraceful" and declaring that revelation of his spy program "does great harm to the United States." The White House and its right-wing acolytes promptly launched a "Hate-the-Times" political campaign.

Name the guy who was the first to reveal that such a bank-spying program was in the works: George W. Bush! At a September 2001 press conference, he announced that he'd just signed an executive order to monitor all international bank transactions.

Watch Lists

From the Bushites' ill-fated Total Information Awareness program (meant to monitor all of our computerized transactions) to the robust efforts by Rumsfeld's Pentagon to barge into the domestic surveillance game, America under Bush has fast become "The Watched Society."

  • Number of data-mining programs being run secretly on us by the federal government: Nearly 200 separate programs at 52 agencies

  • Number of "local activity reports" submitted to the Pentagon in 2004 under the "Threat and Local Observation Notice" program (TALON), which directed military officers throughout our country to keep an eye on suspicious activities by civilians: More than 5,000
    (They included such "threats" as peace demonstrators and 10 activists protesting outside Halliburton's headquarters.)

  • Number of official "watch lists" maintained by the feds: More than a dozen run by 9 different agencies

  • Number of Americans on the Transportation Security Administration's "No- Fly" list: That's a secret.
    (TSA concedes that it's in the tens of thousands. In 2005 alone, some 30,000 people called TSA to complain that their names were mistakenly on the list.)

  • Most famous citizen who is on the No-Fly list and has been repeatedly pulled aside by TSA for additional screenings at airports: Sen. Ted Kennedy

  • How can you get your name removed from TSA list? That's a secret.


Name That Guy!

In 1966, a young Republican congressman stood against his party's elders to cosponsor the original Freedom of Information Act, valiantly declaring that public records "are public property." He said that FOIA "will make it considerably more difficult for secrecy-minded bureaucrats to decide arbitrarily that the people should be denied access to information on the conduct of government."

Who was that virtuous lawmaker? Donald Rumsfeld!

Only eight years later, Gerald Ford's chief of staff strongly urged him to veto the continuation of FOIA. Who was that dastardly staffer? Donald Rumsfeld!

Who is now one of the chief "secrecy-minded bureaucrats" who routinely violates OIA's principles? Right, him again!

Regime of Secrecy
"Democracies die behind closed doors."
-- Appeals court judge Damon Keith, ruling in a 2002 case that the Bushites cannot hold deportation hearings in secret
  • Increase in the number of government documents marked "secret" between 2001 and 2004: 81 percent

  • Number of government documents stamped "secret" in 2001: 8.6 million

  • Number of government documents stamped "secret" in 2004: 15.6 million (a new record)

  • Cost to taxpayers of classifying and securing documents in 2004: $7.2 billion ($460 per document)

  • Number of previously declassified documents that the CIA tried to reclassify as "secret" under a 2001 secret agreement with the National Archives, even though many had already been published and some date back to the Korean War: 25,315

  • Number of different "official designations" the government now has to classify nonsecret information so it still is kept out of the public's reach: Between 50 and 60
    (They include such stamps as CBU: Controlled But Unclassified, SBU: Sensitive But Unclassified, and LOU: Limited Official Use Only.)

  • The only vice-president in history who has claimed that he, like the president, has the inherent authority to mark "secret" on any document he chooses: "Buckshot" Cheney

  • Number of documents Cheney has classified: That's a secret.
    (He claims he does not have to report this to anyone -- not even the president.)

  • Of the 7,045 advisory committee meetings held by the Bushites in 2004, percentage that were completely closed to the public, contrary to the clear intent of the Federal Advisory Committee Act: 64 percent (a new record)

  • Number of times from 1953 to1975 (the peak of the Cold War) that presidents invoked the "state secrets" privilege, which grants them unilateral power in extraordinary instances literally to shut down court cases on the grounds they could reveal secrets that the president doesn't want disclosed: 4

  • Number of times the same privilege was invoked between 2001 and 2006: At least 24

  • Under Clinton, Attorney General Janet Reno issued an official memo instructing agencies to release as much information as possible to the public. In October 2001, AG John Ashcroft issued a memo canceling Reno's approach, expressly instructing agencies to look for reasons to deny the public access to information and pledging to support the denials if the agencies were sued.

  • 2005 FOIA requests still awaiting a response at year's end: 31 percent
    (a one-third increase over the 2004 backlog)

  • Median waiting time to get an answer on FOIA request from Bush's justice department: 863 days


Halliburton
"Halliburton is a unique kind of company."
-- Dick Cheney, September 2003
  • Total value of contracts given to Halliburton for work in the Bush-Cheney "War on Terror" since 2001: More than $15 billion

  • Amount that Halliburton pays to the Third World laborers it imports into Iraq to do the work in its dining facilities, laundries, etc.: $6 per 12-hour day (50 cents an hour)

  • Amount that Halliburton bills us taxpayers for each of these workers: $50 a day

  • Amount that Halliburton bills U.S. taxpayers for:
    • A case of sodas: $45

    • Washing a bag of laundry: $100
  • Halliburton's campaign contributions in Bush-Cheney election years:
    • In 2000: $285,252 (96 percent to Republicans)
    • In 2004: $145,500 (89 percent to Republicans)
      Plus $365,065 from members of its board of directors (99 percent to Republicans)
  • Increase in Halliburton's profits since Bush-Cheney took office in 2000: 379 percent

  • Halliburton's 2005 profit: $1.1 billion
    (highest in the corporation's 86-year history
"Since leaving Halliburton to become George Bush's vice-president, I've severed all of my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interest. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."
Former CEO Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, September 2003
  • Annual payments that Cheney has received from Halliburton since he's been vice-president:
    • 2001: $205,298
    • 2002: $162,392
    • 2003: $178,437
    • 2004: $194,852
    • 2005: $211,465
  • Cash bonus paid to Cheney by Halliburton just before he took office: $1.4 million

  • Retirement package he was given in 2000 after only 5 years as CEO: $20 million
  • Number of times in the past two years that Republicans have killed Sen. Byron Dorgan's amendment to set up a Truman-style committee on war profiteering to investigate Halliburton: 3
  • Naughty word Cheney used during a Senate photo session in 2004 to assail Sen. Patrick Leahy, who had criticized Cheney's ongoing ties to Halliburton: "Go #@! percent yourself.

From The Hightower Lowdown, August 2006, by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of "Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time to Take It Back."
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email


Comments are closed-

IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH
Posted by: thinkverybig on Aug 23, 2006 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My prediction is that BUSH will be brought up on charges, impeached then jailed for crimes against humanity. And deservingly so. He is by far the world's greatest threat to peace and people need to wake up and realize it. Stop believing the media and stop being programmed by what they want to show you on TV or listen to on the radio. It's all to control the masses and they choose to control by fear, lies and more lies. Bush is no good and people should have listened to Jessie Jackson when he said "Stay out of the Bushes."

Bush has done nothing positive since he's been in office and if history seves correctly, his presidency has been a failure like everything else he's done. Do the research, every business venture or anything Bush has been involved in FAILED. This guy is simply and truly BAD LUCK and America along with the world have been cursed to have this idiot STEAL TWO ELECTIONS.

It's time for a change folks and that time is now. Coming soon is "WeMustChange.org"

Stay tuned for more info or email me if you're interested in volunteering for us.


david@thinkverybig.com

» It's Not About Bush...Or Cheney Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Herestratus
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: kizzyjane
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: theantilib
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: kenny453
» You are insane ... Posted by: psudadgrad
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Cheeky
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: theantilib
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: glorybe

Comments are closed-

NO WAY!
Posted by: TT2 on Aug 23, 2006 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FUN still isn't over!

Not untill the FAT LADY sings!

» RE: NO WAY! Posted by: colinmeister
» Yeah. Posted by: holojojo

Comments are closed-

We only have two months to stop this
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 23, 2006 1:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and Blair both signed off a long time ago on the next phase of this war. It will kick off at the end of the summer holidays. That means any attempt to change this course, will only have September and October to do it.

Blair is isolated in his party and 80 per cent of Brits disagree with his foreign policy. Blair can be removed easily from office if people in his party do it. Equally, in Canada new PM Stephen Harper (a Bush clone), has a minority government. If the Liberals and the NDP get together, they can bring him down quickly. That would be two top tier allies removed from the 'war on terror'. That would be two guys who are intimately involved in the planning, removed.

Now for Bush. It looks like Americans only have the November elections to make a difference. But you can also lean on the Dems to stand up and make some noise. We need new ideas that will build support to stop this.

Remember: only two months. Once the invasion of Iran starts, and the retaliation attacks start on the homeland, it will be a carte blanche for Bush and his plans. And then we will all be signed up for another three years of this.

» This stuff is incendiary Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: This stuff is incendiary Posted by: srqwolf
» Bobsays.. Posted by: aurora2484
» Yeah, think like a Troll Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Cheney
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 23, 2006 2:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney is a peace criminal, war criminal, corporate criminal, propaganda criminal, torture criminal, Vice Presidential criminal, secrecy criminal, congressional criminal, constitutional criminal, electoral criminal, international criminal, murdering criminal, wounding criminal, oil stealing criminal, outing criminal and that's just off the top of my head. He's the worst freak in the whole freaking White House. Tons of impeachment material awaits us if we do the right thing.

» RE: Cheney Posted by: willymack
» RE: Cheney Posted by: krose
» RE: Cheney & Bush Haters Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

I always knew it was bad
Posted by: Lizmv on Aug 23, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But to see all the facts compiled in black and white, all in one place........well, I am really pissed.

But it's not Bush and his cronies that I am pissed about. There is always the danger that a man like Bush can be elected. There is certainly no lack of power seeking sociopaths in the world. To quote David Korten " It is not simply that power corrupts. More to the point, it is the corrupt who are the most highly motivated to seek power." (page 36, The Great Turning).

What REALLY pisses me off is that NONE of our elected representatives in either Congress or the Senate have the balls to get rid of this tyrant! We can rant and rage about Bush, but it is a waste of time and energy. It is the members of Congress and Senate we need to go after.

» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: mrcentrist
» 'Murkin people Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: 'Murkin people Posted by: paulaH
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Send this page to your congressperson
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 23, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of whether or not the fool representing you in Washington is a republican or democrat, send a link to this page to him or her.

If this isn't all we need to impeach all three of these hideous bastards (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) and send them to prison for the rest of their fucking lives then we might as well throw in the towel.

Regardless of how ineffectual your particular democratic candidate may seem to you, the very future of the country depends on your voting for them. AND PLEASE, spare me the barrage of emails about how bot parties are just a tweedle-dee, tweedle dumb, same side of the same tired coin! This is not the time to be foolishly experimenting with a third party. We tried that in 2000 and look where it got us! The only people who benefit by a left-leaning third paty are the GOP. Indeed, Rick Santurum of Pennsylvania has been funding his Green Part opponent - He admitted as much the other night on Hardball with Chris Matthews.

The republican party has:
Cut the throats of the poor and the middleclass,

» (dis)Connectthedots can't read Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Send this page to your congressperson
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 23, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of whether or not the fool representing you in Washington is a republican or democrat, send a link to this page to him or her.

If this isn't all we need to impeach all three of these hideous bastards (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) and send them to prison for the rest of their fucking lives then we might as well throw in the towel.

Regardless of how ineffectual your particular democratic candidate may seem to you, the very future of the country depends on your voting for them. AND PLEASE, spare me the barrage of emails about how bot parties are just a tweedle-dee, tweedle dumb, same side of the same tired coin! This is not the time to be foolishly experimenting with a third party. We tried that in 2000 and look where it got us! The only people who benefit by a left-leaning third paty are the GOP. Indeed, Rick Santurum of Pennsylvania has been funding his Green Part opponent - He admitted as much the other night on Hardball with Chris Matthews.

George W. Bus and the republican party have:
Cut the throats of the poor and the middleclass. They have looted our national treasure. They have abandoned their constituancy in favor of a multi-national corprate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex. They have created a geo-politcal catastrophe in the middle east that will take a century to remedy. They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable slaughterhouse in Iraq. They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden. They have sold our nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder. They have made a mockery of the First Ammendment. They have squandered a five trillion dollar surplus on a tax cut for a class of people who didn't need it. They have gutted vital social programs that aid the poor and the elderly that have been in place for over seventy years. They have turned federal emergancy management into a sick joke. They have knocked the teeth out of laws meant to protect working men and women. They have plundered the environment. They have depleted our educational system. They have hijacked this nation's political dialogue. They have ruined our international reputation. They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fanatics. They have denied voting rights to people of color in three states. They have stolen two national elections. They have pissed on our constitution. They have sent our Bill of Rights through the meat grinder....

They must never, ever be allowed to govern our country again.

The grand old party is over.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

» You are absolutely right Tom.... Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» Hey...Tom and Profit. Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Send this page to your congressperson Posted by: Maureen E. Mellom

Comments are closed-

So what's your point?
Posted by: marklar on Aug 23, 2006 4:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not like Bush has done anything wrong. He's been doing what God has told him to do.

» RE: So what's your point? Posted by: marklar

Comments are closed-

Lincoln Turns in his Grave
Posted by: bullwhip7 on Aug 23, 2006 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all you Bush haters - face it - he's YOUR president. And this means he's the captain of your ship. And this means when you undermine him, you undermine your ship.

I don't don't criticize, monitor or examine. But I do mean keep it civil, professional and cut the BULLCRAP!!!

Illegal war??!!

Go look at the record 98% of your so-called progressive leaders went for it. It's only now that things are tough that they are back tracking - yep don't back a loser seems to be the day's call.

But did you hear what Hillary's new policy is shaping up to be, backed by Dean and Kerry? Universal service - i.e. the draft. Gee, I wonder why they want a lot more soldiers for??

Could it be that if they get elected, they will immediately change their tune and say that "actually we need to stay the course..." Bill Clinton did just that on the economy. He got elected on change, then 2 weeks after the election said - "no, I've decided to stay the course on the economy".

So, yeah.

» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» and another thing Posted by: mazel
» RE: and another thing Posted by: bullwhip7
» bullwhip... Posted by: buffaloT
» B(ofal)o.. Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: bullwhip7
» HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: davidbdr
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: aussidawg
» re-instate the draft! Posted by: scott balogh
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave...sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: willymack
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: puckmonkey
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: aussidawg
» pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: mountainmama
» mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: theantilib

Comments are closed-

George W. Bush: Killer of Hope, Destroyer of Dreams
Posted by: marklar on Aug 23, 2006 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He won't be happy until the spiny thorns growing from his head mature and his forked tounge grows longer and he spits firey venom as he speaks his deathly songs. Then we will all know for sure that he is the anti-Christ. anyone who thinks less of Bush is evil as well.

» I agree Posted by: resistance8
» Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: christininrome
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: babs
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: aussidawg

Comments are closed-

out of the frying pan but watch out for the fire
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 23, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
impeach bush, by all means. please. ASAP. but don't forget to include dick, or we'll be in even worse shape than we are now.


Comments are closed-

Sum it up: this is fascism
Posted by: citizenjoe on Aug 23, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some say "oh don't be silly, fascism is a closed terroristic dictatorship,so Bush is a bad guy but not a fascist." That is absolutely false. Fascism was conceived generally to become a freely accepted authoritarian regime of national supremacy, not a tyranny. That is what we have now, although it is a bit tyrannical because it steals from the people and gives to the corporate elite and to Bush's thieving friends. Once more, Bush and Rove and Rumsfeld know that they they fascists every bit as much as many of us know it. They fool you all with their "war against terror". That simply projects the fascist characteristic - a terrorist state-- onto the world. Too bad people know so little history and are so easily fooled. Goebbels was right about that.

» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: taxidave
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» fascism - a bush family value Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: Ocean tides
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» Bullwhip clearly is a fascist Posted by: citizenjoe
» Citizenjoe is a rable rouser Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Bush has cost this country and the planet a positive future
Posted by: greentime on Aug 23, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has set us all back a century or more and given the rest of the world permanent reason to close ranks against us.

He is the symbol of all that is wrong with our nation.

He has made America irrelevant.

He didn't do it alone.

He and his father's pals have stolen more, fouled the earth more and robbed the people of this nation and nations around the world of more than we can ever imagine.

He has placed this fragile earth, home to all life, in such serious jeopardy that the harm he unleashed may be irreversible. He has allowed the worst corporate offenders to unleash poisons and genectic organisms that we will spend thousands of years eradicating just to attempt to rebalance our ecosystems.

He has advanced christian radicalism and corporate greed at the very time when tolerance and humility are most called for. We have gone from a "beacon of hope" to the world's worst psychotic bullying citizen. He has divided this country to the point of unrest.

He has empowered the worst bigots with their cowardly beliefs of white racism to unleash their sociopathic behaviors through the very institutions that were created to serve the people. From FEMA to education, from the military to fiscal management, he has botched the job and put the people of this nation and the world in harms way.

There is no reason, not one, to allow him to stay in the office he stole from the people of this nation.


Comments are closed-

otto
Posted by: otto on Aug 23, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great presentation! Thanks!
Otto


Comments are closed-

Fascist_Papers
Posted by: eblack101 on Aug 23, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim,
You are doing great work, but until you can call a spade a spade, you too are still "beating around the Bush".

What you are detailing for us is clearly a fascist corpocracy, but until writers like you are willing to bread through the F-word barrier, Americans continue to be short-changed by even their most progressive pundits and columnists.

Instead we're given words derived from communism(Pravda), monarchy(King George) or generalized conspiracy(cabal), each pundit trying to mark out his OWN PARTICULAR DEFINITION, thus creating a situation analogous to the way the Democratic Party castrates itself...

Divide and be conquered.

Once voting is run by Republican corporations, we are facing corporate fascism. Once fundimentalist churches are recieving money from the governmnet to recruit Republican voters and act as propaganda headquarters, we are dealing with the theocratic wing of the same corporate fascism.

Once the opposition party is utterly dependent on the same foundations, corporations and political groups as the Republicans to maintain their place at the trough, we are dealing with corporate fascism.

Once we have a Pentagon revolving-door, multi-billion dollar military production line run by the very same corporations, we have a military industrial complex that is a central arm of corporate fascism.

Wake up, Jim. Many of our fathers and grandfathers died fighting to see that this same fascism couldn't destroy our country.

If you and your columnist associates will simply identify the problem, and name it and publicize it, the American voter can begin to understand the grave situation he faces, and start the long arduous process of turning America back into the great democracy our Forefathers intended it to be.

You're doing a great job, Jim, but you've got to break through the "F-word" if you really want to stop "beating around the Bush".


Comments are closed-

how long
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 23, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how long before the troops are in the streets? how long before our own september 1? by our votes, by our comments, we reveal ourselves to the enemy. how long before kristallnacht, with the dissenters (ourselves) as the targets? how long?

» Universal Soldier Posted by: Wish
» howard beale, anyone? Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: how long Posted by: yesman
» RE: how long Posted by: willymack

Comments are closed-

Who is to blame for Bush?
Posted by: packofwolves on Aug 23, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and all his cronies should be, and hopefully will be arrested and tried for their crimes, if not here in the U.S. perhaps, hopefully, somewhere else in the world. Would be justice that they would get the same kind of treatment they have given to others. As far as Bush is concerned, it's not his fault he and his associates are allowed to rape our country and kill our young, it's our fault because we're letting them get away with it. How does that saying go, something like Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on me. I personally can't believe anyone could vote for this moron once, let alone twice. Think hard before you vote for someone. Do their promises seem too good to be true, or wishful hoping? If so, then they are lying so you need to investigate. Fact, our taxes will have to be raised to get us out of this awful mess and to provide much needed services for our citizens. Any politician who claims s/he will lower your taxes is lying to you. If you vote for republicans of any kind after this blatant disregard for our country and it's constitution, then what you get is what you deserve. The media is pumping out so much propaganda that it's truly hard to find the truth, if it is even something we can find any more. Education is a right not a privilege for the wealthy. Rules and laws should apply to everyone. Send the children of government officials into the war in Iraq and it will end promptly - start with the Bush kids - they seem to be pretty worthless anyway. IMPEACH BUSH. He is an evil, dry drunk who needs to be put in his place.


Comments are closed-

tedbohne, PhD
Posted by: tedbohne on Aug 23, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though there are some things I didn't know in this litany of what George et al did, If people are going to stand by and let it happen, then why bother? There is a planet load of data out here, both factual and evidential to bring the Bush Regime down by force and now. But, Americans will do nothing, thinking that the electoral system is the way to handle this despite the fact it has been clearly and unequivocally defeated. The Bush Regime has on three occasions now with malice and aforethought and using clearly illegal means in a clandestine fashion, sidestepped the elections. There is an increasing body of data that this will happen again, and then what are Americans going to do? Wait and "vote" in the 2008 joke? In other countries, Bush would be dead by now with his cohorts, family, dogs, cats, houses burnt down, and etc. You know like the jews do to the Palestinians with your tax dollars?

» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: Craig C
» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: krose
» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Preaching to the Choir
Posted by: Proud Liberal on Aug 23, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we are all wasting energy preaching to the choir on sites such as Alternet, especially all these calls (usually shouted in upper case) to "IMPEACH BUSH."

If we manage to elect a Democratic House in November (and all Democrats support the move...how likely is that?), I suppose it might be possible to impeach Bush. If we also manage to elect a Democratic Senate in November it might then also be possible that the Senate would vote to convict him and remove him from office.

Then what? A President Cheney?

Next, imagine the above scenario repeated to impeach and convict and remove Cheney. Presuming Nancy Pelosi would then be Speaker of the House (and next in the line of succession), she then would become Prez.

Even less likely, you say?

Exactly!

By the time any of the above would happen the Bush/Cheney term would be over anyway. We need to preach less to each other (I include myself) and get out there and elect Democrats to office in November. We've got 2 1/2 months to do it, and then two years in which a Democratic Congress might (hopefully) put the reigns to administration abuses. Spending that time impeaching Bush would assure that nothing else would get done during that time.

» RE: Preaching to the Choir Posted by: willymack
» RE: Preaching to the Choir Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Mid East strategy
Posted by: Edward George on Aug 23, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush League Mid East strategy - Tame hornets by beating nest with stick.

» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

New World Order
Posted by: DoctorAndy on Aug 23, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And a Masonic shadow governing elite dedicated to its New World Order regardless of what happens to our former Constitutional Republic.

The truth and the people be damned; the end justifies the means in our brave new world!


Comments are closed-

BUSHCO MUST BE STOPPED AND HUNG BY THE NECK
Posted by: Burtonger on Aug 23, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone of these world criminals MUST be prosecuted and sentenced to DEATH for the crimes they commit daily. America may never recover from the crimes they have wontonly commited in america's name around the world .
IF they{BUSHCO} are not prosecuted to the full extent of the law americans will suffer around the world and be held accountable for their leaders crimes. Truth will prevail ,NO MATTER WHAT LAWS ARE CHANGED by these criminals.


Comments are closed-

revolution now
Posted by: thehousedog on Aug 23, 2006 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i urge all americans to take their newspapers, flyswatters, automobiles, farm combines, computer flat screen lcd monitors, ipods, mont blanc pens, cell phones, credit cards, digital cameras, and suv's and throw them at your nearest government office and demand a redress of greviences and impeach our reich-master bush and goon squad. it's time we had real revolution in this country. we should not be afraid of our government - they should be afraid of us (to paraphrase a movie that is coming out sometime in the future). gosh how i hate living in this country right now - so much happiness, success, wealth and money and bliss, and at the same time, so much bad karma associated with these pleasures. we all want to stand up and get things straightened out but who wants to risk the repercussions to personal fortune?

they have us right where they want us.

» RE: revolution now Posted by: Craig C
» RE: revolution now Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: revolution now Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: revolution now Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Blame it all on Bush
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 23, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would blame most of it on American Ignorance, rather than Bush's Arrogance.

Bush is a symptom of the disease, not the cause.

» RE: Blame it all on Bush Posted by: krose

Comments are closed-

Why are you targets of Terrorists?
Posted by: Canadain Realist on Aug 23, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as the American people continue to elect self serving, greedy neocons into office, the American people will always be the target of Terrorists. Your leaders feel free to attack any country they deem worthy of raping and pilaging, through either war or economic sabotage. While no one can condone the attacks on your World Trade Center this type of activity wil only increase if you don't do something about your leaders. They have even refused to abide by NAFTA rulings (Unless they are in your favour). Why should any people beleive the words of a country that lies and steals as their primary tool of negotiation? Ask yourselves, why you are the target of terrorism and you will see the answewrs to your problems with the world. Until this is done you are just adding fuel to the fires of those who see you as an evil empire. I happen to know that the average American is a good person who wishes to live in a society where everyone is valued. Too bad your leaders make you all look so bad in the eyes of the world. You get what you sow.

» RE: Why are you targets of Terrorists? Posted by: Canadain Realist

Comments are closed-

The best way to
Posted by: NamVeT on Aug 23, 2006 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
get rid of georgie halibush and his pals is one well placed bomb when they are ALL in the White House. Problem solved. Bush & Co. are the fucking terrorists. The only real bummer would be destroying the White House.

» RE: The best way to Posted by: babs
» RE: The best way to Posted by: Craig C
» RE: The best way to Posted by: NamVeT

Comments are closed-

smaltz
Posted by: frenchcanadienne on Aug 23, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Paul Klugman's NY Times piece, "Bush Sets The Science of Governance Back 500 Years" [Aug.23rd, 2006?] Kings had privatized armies [mercenaries], private "tax farmers" [IRS will farm out its collections to private firms]. The old habits of extortion and graft come back. A civil bureaucracy that's accountable to the government will be gone. The republic will be gone, replaced by a feudal nation of crony aristocrats and serfs.

» RE: smaltz Posted by: Craig C

Comments are closed-

rebuttal
Posted by: snat55 on Aug 23, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you have no idea what's coming.you have no idea what an arab mentality is .It is tantamount to nazism.soon you'll see what President Bush means when he says he has to safegaurd our country.Just try to imagine just one Manhattan bus exploding in midtown like they do in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv.Don't tell me it's not going to happen.How many times have they tried? How many times have they been thwarted?It's nice to sit with our starbucks and Times bu thard to face reality.

» RE: rebuttal Posted by: SALLY EVANS
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: babs
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: chomsky
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: bullwhip7
» OH REALLY! Posted by: gonzoskismet

Comments are closed-

gandalf
Posted by: groworgo on Aug 23, 2006 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been a storm gathering agaisnt the free world. It began in 1979 when Iran overthrew the US embassy. Since then we have been attacked continuously culminating in the tragedy of 9/11. The UN identified Iraq as the foremost agent in the league of terror. We did what we had to do. We would do it again

No amount of hateful vicous attacks on George Bush can change history, but it is certainly changing the future. People like this malcontent whose oped I am responding to are a boon for the Islamonazis. These people give Al Jazeera and the Islamonazis all the free advertising they need. You are one of Al Quedas most effective recruitment tools

So go ahead and warp facts and bend words and meaning. At least we know that you as well as the Islamofascists, are the enemy of freedom

» RE: gandalf Posted by: Craig C
» RE: gandalf Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: gandalf Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: gandalf Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: gandalf Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: gandalf Posted by: Aussie Kim
» history began in '79 Posted by: gonzoskismet
» Katrina Response was Good Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Why?
Posted by: syn7hor on Aug 23, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY WHY WHY don't you americans do something?!?!???!?!?! How Bush has any public crediblity AT ALL is absolutely amazing. He's turned your once great and admired country into absolute shit. In Sweden, even those not into politics knows Bush is dumb. How the fuck can you elect someone who can barely speak? HALF the people of your country voted for his SECOND time. Why aren't every goddamn american running around and screaming in the streets?

You rational thinking americans needs to sort this mess out. Unlike in Hitler's Germany, you can speak out! Bush hasn't built enough camps for you guys yet, but please hurry!

Your country is scaring the shit out of the rest of us damnit!

*awaiting the CIA to take me to some secret prison* Fuck'em.

» RE: Why? Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Why? Posted by: symcokid
» RE: Why? Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Why? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Why? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Why? Posted by: syn7hor
» RE: Why? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Why? Posted by: Solar Wind

Comments are closed-

9-11, 9-11, terruh, stay the course, 9-11, islamofascists,
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Aug 23, 2006 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• If 9/11 was not a 100% inside job, a false flag operation; then a portion of the U.S. government at least knew about the plan for years in advance and allowed/enabled it to happen for their own political gain.

• Al Qaeda, the Taliban, bin Laden, and Hussein were all creations of the CIA. That's not conspiracy theory, that's history.

• "They" don't hate us for our "freedom," they hate us for being warmongering imperialist pirates.

If America would just fucking go home and mind our own business, stop trying to play king-of-the-world, stop trying to force our so-called culture on everyone else on the planet, stop screwing over other countries for our own economic gain, and stop supporting the violent intolerant right-wing theocracy in charge of Israel- the Muslim theocrats would return to their war on bare midriffs. With no credible enemy, they would become irrelevant and eventually rejected by the people of their countries.
Why don't they hate Canada?

• Terrorism kills a trivial number of Americans compared to, say, fatal bee stings and lightning strikes, and you are thousands of times more likely to die in a car crash. They're not fighting a war on terror out of fear, they're creating a fear of terror out of the need for war.

• Bush's America is not an America worth fighting for. As aggressors and war criminals, we're now a legitimate military target. I will not die for a flag whose meaning is now somewhere between the stars-and-bars and the swastika in the eyes of the world. If we are to consider what Israel just did to the people of Lebanon legitimate, then how would your "Islamofascists" killing American people in retaliation for the actions of the Neocons be any different?

• We have our own crazy religious fanatics in this country. A Christian theocracy can be just as bad as a Muslim theocracy. They both want Armageddon, they both want genocide of the infidels. The fascists in DC would never have been able to go on this latest crusade without the support of the flag-waving Jesus freaks. I say fight them over here so we don't have to fight them over there.

• You've obviously bought the shit they've shoveled, you've become exactly what they tried to turn you into for their own selfish aims. You are the kind of Americans the world hates, and when the revolution comes, you will be the second against the wall.

• And the horse you rode in on.


Comments are closed-

Yo bullwhip
Posted by: rollo on Aug 23, 2006 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're rude, you can't spell and your command of 'the truth' is as subjective as anyone's; bring us concrete proof that Gore uttered the words "I invented the internet".

It doesn't exist. Just like the WMDs. And lots of other fictions being visited upon the populace by neocons in CYA mode.

» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: willymack
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: stevefoagardner
» Yo stevefoamingatmouth Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Craig C
Posted by: Craig C on Aug 23, 2006 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the war is illegal, virtually the entire Congress of the US is guilty, as most of the House and Senate voted to authorize military action if Saddam did not "give up his weapons of mass destruction". The idea that over 5000 artillery shells filled with Sarin derivatives and other types of gasses don't qualify as WMD's is ridiculous. In addition, there were numerous other reasons that justified the war. The fact that Iraqi forces continually fired at patrolling American and British aircraft in the "no fly zone" after the 1991 Gulf War is an easy one. The failure of Iraq to comply with any of the United Nations resolutions passed against Iraq post '91 is another good one. The fact that the Oil for Food program was being used to fill Saddam's coffers with cash instead of helping the Iraqi people is another.
You may not care about what is really right or wrong in the world, but the United States and the Republican Party definitely do.

http//:blogresponder.blogspot.com

» RE: Craig C Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Craig C Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Craig C Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

What can you say?
Posted by: vangogh69 on Aug 23, 2006 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Bush is a criminal who has acted callously on numerous occasions...BUT, he doesn't do so in a vacuum. To the point, the so-called "opposition party" (which you'd do well to check your history on that score if you really believe in em...a hint: the dems were Pro-Slavery, Anti-Reconstruction, and anti-union for a longggggggggggggg time) not only helps Bush & Co. along their merry way, but encourage him with their acquiescence and general tomfoolery. Politically speaking, America is disgusting and as someone stated, neo-fascist. So what can we do to change it?

To start, we have to stop this foolishness about elections and call a spade a spade. We all know the only value either party believes in is $$$$$ and power, fuck the people. We must not dignify their contempt any longer by participating in their humiliation of us. Secondly, we have to take the info about both parties criminality to the streets to inform people (because you'd be surprised just how ignorant Americans really are). We have to get people to connect the "war on terror" to the price of oil, to American consumption of resources, to the American economy, to the capitalist system, and so on. (And we must MOST DEFINATELY get people to brand Israel as an outlaw state and stop funding thier ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.) This is to start...

The situation isn't hopeless for salvation comes from within. We must all work together, be willing to give up our comforts, and work towards change. A better world is possible.


Comments are closed-

A speach or statement that all can join in on
Posted by: Door man on Aug 23, 2006 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been hard pressed not to simply gripe and find no way of expressing anything hopeful for the Democrats or Independants who run against this Republican machine. This is an awful jaugernaut that needs to be addressed headon and offer an alternative. here is my first hit at it..... please think to add and join in a statement to begin a new way of thinking.

When I was at the Democratic booth at the County Fair here, we were asking people to write down on a large pad - what their concerns were.

A fellow came to the booth (a union carpenter) and said that he'd just as soon tell us what he thinks. He said he was sick and tired of hearing about 911 and the threat of terrorism. He said he doesn't even listen to the news anymore because he is convinced of hearing more lies.

He went on for a bit - It occurred to me that this fellow is definitely not alone in this country and that if we had the leadership in this country to take these guys head on by asking the American people to stand up and truly be counted to answer these policies - To say - It is tragedy what the Neo-con Bush, Cheney and company have done to our credibility and honor throughout the world we would find a ready audience. It is a disgrace to find that in 6 short years this administration has used the phantom of 911 to justify a steady barrage on human and civil rights not only in the pursuit of an illegally conjured war but against American citizens as well – to nearly bankrupt this country of it’s standing in the world diplomatically, economically, and weaken our military capabilities as well.

It makes no sense for us to berate and attempt to shout down this bankrupt administration that seeks to obfuscate and change reality to fit their won sordid agenda. It is time to empower YOU, The American citizen to stand up and tell these outlaws what kind of America you want to be a part of. Americans are not a weak and frightened people hiding under beds waiting for an imaginary terrorist to attack.... We (the citizens) engaged in this grand experiment of Democracy are the leaders that carry the light in the world - The light that allows others, less fortunate, less able to fight, to see and follow our example. It is not the light of a cannon fire blowing into the homes of Iraqis and Lebanese to force change or suffer the wrath of an Empire.

We cannot believe that the American wants to be seen as the strongest, most powerful bully in this world – but rather the compassionate, nurturing, helpful and confident peacemaker.

Which will it be - America?

I am not a speech writer - but we have to come up with bold statements and then be ready for the onslaught of these control freak mucks - and blast them back with the confidence that we are right.

Forget about pandering to the patriotic cause. Dismiss it! For anyone to impugn another’s patriotism because he or she does not believe in killing 1000 to save one, is indefensible! It should not be tolerated. Patriotism is preserving the rapidly eroding values and commitments to freedom we once had. Patriotism is stopping this administration from destroying what they have already horribly injured. It is regaining our honor, integrity and hope we provided for the world and our own citizens... Let's take it back.


Comments are closed-

BUSH KNEW FROM THE BEGINNING IRAQ HAD NO WMD'S
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 23, 2006 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Worse yet, BUSH AND COMPANY KNEW FROM THE BEGINNING IRAQ HAD NO WMD'S. And, there are lots of stories and evidence to support this. When the WTC was hit, Bush tried to order subordinates to link it to Sadaam. He told his CIA chief to link Sadaam with terrorists. Now, Bush tried everything in the book. But you will not see this on Fox or CNN. But why? Well this article answers part of the question. What this means is that the criminal malfesance is even deeper, the contempt for world opinion even greater then what we imagined. As for Clinton and what he supposedly knew, whatever he did know was never enough to go to war with Iraq, was it? The facts speak for themselves.


Comments are closed-

Misleading..........
Posted by: R.A. on Aug 23, 2006 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Since leaving Halliburton to become George Bush's vice-president, I've severed all of my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interest. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."
Former CEO Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, September 2003

Annual payments that Cheney has received from Halliburton since he's been vice-president:
2001: $205,298
2002: $162,392
2003: $178,437
2004: $194,852
2005: $211,465
Cash bonus paid to Cheney by Halliburton just before he took office: $1.4 million
Retirement package he was given in 2000 after only 5 years as CEO: $20 million


Too bad this article doesn't mention that this is deferred compensation that is set in stone and is independent of the company’s performance. (I might give it more credence if it did.)

A factcheck.org article took on the so-called "ties" Cheney still has to the company:

http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html

This is an analysis of a campaign ad from 2004.

On the subject of his deferred compensation: "The $398,548 Halliburton has paid to Cheney while in office is all deferred compensation, a common practice that high-salaried executives use to reduce their tax bills by spreading income over several years. In Cheney's case, he signed a Halliburton form in December of 1998 choosing to have 50% of his salary for the next year, and 90% of any bonus money for that year, spread out over five years. (As it turned out, there was no bonus for 1999.) We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document the deferral agreement as well, and he supplied us with a copy of the form , posted here publicly for the first time.

Legally, Halliburton can't increase or reduce the amount of the deferred compensation no matter what Cheney does as vice president. So Cheney's deferred payments from Halliburton wouldn't increase no matter how much money the company makes, or how many government contracts it receives.

On the other hand, there is a possibility that if the company went bankrupt it would be unable to pay. That raises the theoretical possibility of a conflict of interest -- if the public interest somehow demanded that Cheney take action that would hurt Halliburton it could conceivably end up costing him money personally. So to insulate himself from that possible conflict, Cheney purchased an insurance policy (which cost him$14,903) that promises to pay him all the deferred compensation that Halliburton owes him even if the company goes bust and refuses to pay. The policy does contain escape clauses allowing the insurance company to refuse payment in the unlikely events that Cheney files a claim resulting "directly or indirectly" from a change in law or regulation, or from a "prepackaged" bankruptcy in which creditors agree on terms prior to filing. But otherwise it ensures Cheney will get what Halliburton owes him should it go under.


On his stock options: "That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), ....(see link for rest)

» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: R.A.
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: R.A.

Comments are closed-

NONSENSE THAT IRAQ HAD WMD'S
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 23, 2006 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so-called artillery shells with Sarin residue were remnants of the war with Iran. They were regarded as so old or in such poor condition as to be undeliverable. BUT HERE IS THE PROOF - It is accepted in American Media everywhere, including Fox, CNN, MSNBC that Iraq had no WMD's. If the so-called artillery shells story really panned out, wouldn't this be big news? EVEN PRESIDENT BUSH now says Iraq had no WMD's. Cut the nonsense.

» Wouldn't this be big news Posted by: DoctorAndy

Comments are closed-

We have met the enemy and the enemy is us
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 23, 2006 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never have I read a commentary that with minimal partisan mudslinging so succinctly captures the facts of life in our post-911 world — the facts as they are construed on Pennsylvania Avenue, that is. True, in a time of war sacrifices can't be entirely avoided; namely, fewer personal rights in the interest of preserving national security. On the other hand, the irony does not escape me that in the name of providing freedom for faraway nations, we have begun to loosen our grasp upon our own American birthright.

Even if we are to assume that the rise of secrecy and the demise of public access and government accountability is a necessary price to pay during wartime, one can only hope and pray that we do not continue to become entangled in military conflicts abroad. If the loss of our national identity, personal freedoms and customary checks-and-balances are the price we must pay for “security”, so too should we recognize that the more intrusive sacrifices we make the more likely we are to fall upon our own sword — and in so doing handing the enemies of democracy and liberty a victory wherein the only guilty party is ourselves..

Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “There is nothing to fear, but fear itself.” Fear, by its very definition, is reactionary and shortsighted. Fear leads to haste. Haste leads to unquestioning loyalty, which is often defended as one's "patriotic duty". Poor leadership, in turn, leads to the erosion of our Constitution. The erosion of our Constitution leads to legislation from the bench. The weakening of our justice system leads to the loss of civil rights. Total cost? The American Dream. Value? Priceless.

Perhaps that's why Benjamin Franklin wisely observed, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Any psychologist will tell you that security is an illusion. A sense of security is a coping mechanism that prevents most people from becoming paralyzed by fear on a day-to-day basis. It keeps us from contemplating the odds of slipping on a patch of ice, drowning in a swift storm current, being pinned in by wildfire, ripped from our homes by a hurricane or tornado, slipping in the shower, attacked by roaming dogs, hospitalized with severe food poisoning, assault by a mugger, struck down by illness or long-term disability — or, heaven forbid — wiped out by a dirty bomb explosion. Death happens. The when, where and how is not up to us. What IS within our legitimate concern and control is whether or not we have a Constitution or a democratic Republic when the secrecy-pushers are through with the courts, Congress and the Constitution itself. If we are going to fear for the future, fear what harm fear itself can breed.

Shakespeare had it right when he wrote: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves.”


Comments are closed-

Support for Data
Posted by: nhilbourn on Aug 23, 2006 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know Jim Hightower has written a book on the Bush Administration's black glove operations, but still, I would've liked to see some citations of where he got the data for his article from.

It would help to calm souls like mine which seem to long for works cited pages.

Maybe just links within the article. That would've been nice.

» RE: Support for Data Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Just one question
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 23, 2006 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has mostly done pretty well when it joins wars _after_ they have started - riding into the fray, as it were, and coming to the rescue. Hence the slavish loyalty of governments like mine. (no disrespect intended to those who helped fight for us and others)

But has the US done _any_ good AT ALL in any of the wars it ever declared on other countries?

» RE: Just one question Posted by: anapple
» RE: Just one question Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Just one question Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Just one question Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Just one question Posted by: bullwhip7
» World's biggest cowards Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: World's biggest cowards Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: World's biggest cowards Posted by: Aussie Kim

Comments are closed-

Vote of "No Confidence" in e-Voting Era [Calling all techies]
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 24, 2006 1:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can Americans wise up in the voting booth if the technology used to record our votes surpasses our prevailing tech literacy, thereby limiting our usefulness in "keeping them honest"?

Sadly, I have little confidence in the electoral process now that it has gone digital. Whether we're talking George W. Bush or someone else who equally offends American tradition and sensibility at some point in the future, how do we oust them on Election Day when the average American can't even get a paper audit? Should we start a campaign to vote absentee only?

Cheaters who want to cheat will find a way to do it, regardless. Unfortunately, technology leaves more opportunities to "cover one's tracks" without the general public catching on. By contrast, common sense dictates that the easiest type of vote to validate is the lowest tech type — the type that is so straightforward that a child can recognize tampering. The worst confusion you are going to get with a paper ballot, for example, is a "hanging chad." By contrast, check out the work of two Harvard PhDs that founded www.blackboxvoting.org, and also wrote a related book "Spychips: How Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID" (www.spychips.com). These sites blow wide open the idea that technology, in general, is secure. Whether the threat is viral — the same sort that infects your PC with Spyware — or personal, say a disgruntled e-voting employee who has been offered a handsome bribe for reprogramming all "No" votes for Mr. Smith to become "Yes" votes, the opportunities for foul play and mechanical breakdown are enormous. Modern day computer technology has exceeded or wisdom to deal with it appropriately. We have, in essence, opened Pandora's Box. Now that the lid is off, you can be sure that a 13-year-old hacker won't be the only one tempted to exploit it.

Technology-wise, we are living in the sociological equivalent of the Wild West. Problem? There aren't enough technologically literate sheriffs to patrol the digital landscape. And much like the Old West, “digital homesteaders” with the technological literacy to stop lawlessness are few and far between. Thus, as long as bona fide law enforcement and government agencies fall short of the necessary numbers to reign in technology gone wild, the responsibility for law, order and accountability lies in OUR HANDS — those that are technologically proficient and/or employed in such areas, that is. Thus, I would urge the hired hands working this New Frontier not to hack for malicious purposes, but to carefully scan their slice of the digital horizon for signs that those in power — in particular companies that supply technology for e-voting and other “public trust” state, federal and local uses are held in check. In this way, in the event that a real conspiracy is hatched, someone will be there to toll the warning bell or leak the necessary documentation to the press.

More than just informed voters, this country needs the help of ordinary Americans who realize that their eyes and ears account for a piece of the puzzle that forms the Big Picture. Already, some of the high-ranking employees of e-voting companies have been "outed" by the media for having been convicted of various felonies that should preclude such employment. Nevertheless, some e-voting spokespeople have gone on record promising to "deliver the election" to a local or national candidate. As yourself: Would anyone in their right mind make that claim if they were NOT rigging the vote? (Hiding in plain sight?) To prevent such blatant disregard for the Public Trust, this post is a call to all poll workers and techs, particularly those that hold jobs in critical "public access": Keep your eyes peeled and document everything no matter how insignificant it may seem at the time. You never know when you might be called upon to be part of the solution.


Comments are closed-

Convince the Unconvinced, Jim! Cite Sources, Use Footnotes!
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 24, 2006 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To echo a previous post, I too would like to see more citations so that when I email this page to my conservative or non-news reading friends and family they don't go into knee-jerk shock and denial and respond by accusing the author, Jim Hightower, of inventing these alarming collection of facts and stats about the Bush administration.

For people who are regular media “consumers” — the minority of Americans who are likely to post or read from a site like this — this information on President George W. Bush and VP Cheney may come as no great surprise. But keep in mind that one of the reasons we have a corrupt political landscape is because we have a bankrupt civic landscape. No one who isn’t already politically receptive to this sort of subject matter will accept the “difficult truth.” For the same reason, I predict that no punitive action will be taken against the Bush presidency now or ever. We are no longer living in the Watergate era or even the Bill Clinton era. Americans are tired of investigations and apathetic towards questions of character, lawfulness and morality.

The typical response you’ll get from people who dislike what they read or hear is that the author of the offending news or commentary item is a part of the “vast media conspiracy”. This excuses your average citizen from paying serious attention to the issues that are deserving of public scrutiny. Never mind that this "conspiracy" is simultaneously a left-wing media conspiracy and a right-wing media conspiracy. Like the lead character on Discovery Channel’s “Myth Busters” — who oftentimes wears a shirt that reads, “I reject your reality and substitute my own”, most Americans of opposing political inclination or political apathy simply WON'T accept the facts — and to whatever extent this colors their thinking they will reject these facts in favor of their own desired perceptions. For the same reason, few Americans are going to do their own homework to verify whether someone like Jim Hightower has reported his findings honestly. It's far easier to simply slap a label of “political bias” on any reality that contradicts their notions and go about their business — including their next trip into a voting booth — completely unchanged no matter how blatant or overt the crimes of character or political crisis becomes.

Americans are seeing the results of poor political leadership because too many voters — if they bother to vote at all — have become so politically shallow, lazy and partisan that we do not respond to any truth that does not fall within partisan lines or jive with the impression we get from a few televised debates. So numb are most people to the truth that they would even go so far as to deny calls for investigation in order to continue towing the party line unimpeded by doubt or dissent. The only thing that might be a little tougher to deny would be the sort of citations and references you find in a book or scholarly journal. Newspaper and Website quotations are no longer enough — writers need to pepper their news items and commentary with multiple footnotes to start making inroads with an increasingly distrustful public. Likewise, Jim Hightower needs references, citations and as many links to credible news sources as possible — not to preach to the choir but to reach the unconvinced who are too lazy, frightened or partisan to search out the facts for themselves.


Comments are closed-

Why does This all remind me of...
Posted by: Verdillac on Aug 24, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revenge of the Sith?

I almost expect Bush to pull off his mask revealing Emperor Palpatine beneath declaring total Executive Power over the Universe. Oh, Yoda, with your lightsaber, Need You We Do! MmmMM?

Things could get really bad really fast after November. We may seriously have to consider living up to the Declaration of Independence and rise up again.
Of course if one were to ask the NRA, they will say "there's nothing wrong you tree-hugging peaceniks!" Not one of them has sqeaked about the threats made and carried out against the OTHER amendments! It might be funny to watch their reaction when their membership data base is used to round them up first...the ones with traceable addresses, who belong to a firearms club..I know that would be my first move, if I were a power-hungry fascist.
Look out NRA, Bush will get you too! He probably ALREADY knows where you live and how many weapons you have. Think about that!


Comments are closed-

SageStarr
Posted by: timrowan on Aug 24, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Hightower missed one. This factoid comes from "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill" by Ron Suskind, about the former Alcoa CEO's two frustrating years as Bush's mostly ignored Treasury Secretary.

Date on which invading Iraq was first discussed at a George W. Bush Cabinet meeting: January 30, 2001, day 10 of his first term.


Comments are closed-

Bush & the forces of evil
Posted by: show me the truth on Aug 24, 2006 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As stated in many books...the attack of 9/11 was a gift to the white house and the henchmen who yank Bush's chains. The war on terror had nothing to do with Iraq....this plan was drawn up and Clinton was asked to give the ok which he refused to do.
It was all about spreading America's influence in the world which of course has suffered severve damage and they have lost all credibility in the world. Why should there be democracy in Iraq and not in Saudi Arabia? Hypocracy to say the least.
Bush is oil and the saudies are oil....their is no democracy in America anyway...it is just a facade and the millions are ruled by lobbyists and the rich for the benefit of the rich ... they don't care how mant American boys get killed


Comments are closed-

Parable
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Aug 24, 2006 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what happens when 'fools rush in.'

» Wasp's Nest Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

EXCLUSIVE: NEW CONVERSATION PICKED UP ON OVAL OFFICE PHONE
Posted by: TheStranger on Aug 24, 2006 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DIGGING DEEPER
By Ivan G. Goldman

--Mama, I made a big mess.

--That’s ok, dear. Just get the servants to clean it up.

--No, mama, I tried that.

--That’s what I tell your father. You can’t get decent help anymore. What kind of mess are we talking about, anyway? Ketchup, a coke bust? What?

--Iraq, mama. The one with the ‘q’ at the end.

--Oh, that. Listen, Iraq’s not nearly as terrible as everybody says. Watch Fox, dear, like I told you.

--I do, mama.

--Iraq’s a lot like Katrina.

--That’s what everybody says.

--Those Iraqis are just like all those colored people they showed complaining about everything down there. Listen, those Arabs live much better than they did before we bombed the crap out of them. Money just pours into the place. Cheney wets his beak, everything’s coming up roses.

--But they say a lot of American troops got killed and burned and everything.

--Really. Do you know any of them?

--No.

--Me neither. They’d be out on the street if we hadn’t given them a paycheck.

--But mama, they’re dead and missing arms and legs and stuff.

--Yeah? Well listen, kid, grow some backbone. Those oil fields we grabbed over there will be worth a mint someday. So forget about it. Clear some brush or something. Cheney will watch the store. From his bunker, I mean.

--Okay, mama. But can’t you stop everybody from making fun of me?

--You little squirt. Stop whining. I told your father a thousand times we shoulda let Jeb inherit the presidency. That’s what the Godfather did. But your father? He knew better. Passed up Michael and gave the job to Fredo.

--Huh?

--Ride your SUV around the ranch. And be sure to practice saying ‘Bring it on’ in the mirror. It’ll make you feel masculine. Too bad it won’t make you smart.

--Huh?

[From http://ivangoldman.blogspot.com/]


Comments are closed-

Der Fuhrer Bush
Posted by: CONSPIRACYNUT on Aug 24, 2006 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My bet is that before the next election there will be another terrorist event of some type that will give Bush the excuse he is looking for to declare martial law and remain president.

» Another Conspiracy!!!! Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Let's give it a chance now!
Posted by: talkville on Aug 24, 2006 11:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aww, come on! We're only a little over 6 1/2 years into this glorious, awesome New American Century. Just think about it, there's about 93 years or so of more fun and surprises -- and oh, so much 'democracy'! Meanwhile, there's a name - Iraq - looking for a country... ooops! I think I heard Caligula whispering.


Comments are closed-

ECLECTICIST , S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Aug 26, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OUR FAMILY HAS READ YOUR BOOK ON THE DISGRACEFUL BUSH FAMILY, ESPECIALLY BUSH "SILVERFOOT" 43...THE READING OF THE MESSAGE 'S "IN BETWEEN THE LINES" OR DIRECTLY STATING OF THE EVIL ACTIONS TAKEN BY BUSH 43 HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY THE AMERICAN PUBLIC...

EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE IMPLIED THE MEANING OF THE OLD MILITARY ADAGE OF " B-O-H-I-C-A", NO ONE IS LISTENING...SO TRY AGAIN, AGAIN, AND AGAIN...
AND YOU ARE OFFERING THE PROVERBIAL FIX OF THE "VASELINE" BEFORE THE RAPE, YOU MAY ADVISE THE USE OF THE NEW PRODUCTS LIKE WD-40, LIQUID WRENCH, ETC, TO EASE THE INSERTION EVENT...AS MARK TWAIN ONCE REMARKED :

"IT CAN PROBABLY BE SHOWN BY FACTS AND FIGURES THAT THERE IS NO DISTINCTLY NATIVE AMERICAN CRIMINAL CLASS EXCEPT CONGRESS."

AND, SOME ADDITIONAL EXCERPTS THAT AID INDENTIFYING THE UNSCRUPULOUS BUSH 43 :

See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda. GEORGE W. BUSH

Regrettably, empirical studies reveal, however, that authoritarians are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral. They are also often conservatives without conscience who are capable of plunging this nation into disasters the likes of which we have never known. JOHN DEAN 7/22/06

“By the time Richard Milhous Nixon goes on trial in the Senate, the only real reason for trying him will be to understand how he ever became president of the United States at all ... and the real defendant, at that point, will be the American Political System. “ -- Hunter S. Thompson, 1973.(WHAT ABOUT BUSH 43???)

ALSO, GEORGE BERNARD SHAW CLEARLY DESCRIBES
BUSH 43 MENTALITY:

He knows nothing and thinks he knows everything. That points clearly to a political career. -

He who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways, will receive anything from the Lord. Let the lowly brother boast in his exaltation, and the rich in his humiliation, because like the flower of the grass he will pass away. James 1: 1-15

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++


Comments are closed-

What defines a Traitor
Posted by: bookwoman on Aug 26, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luckily for the GOP, they made Impeachment a bad word. The American people will not stand for another travesty such as they dragged Bill Clinton through. Its too bad that "W" can't be considered for Impeachment for Treason. He has squandered our economic worth with his stupid unnecessary war; he has caused the death of 2500 American plus countless Iraqis(how do you look at yourself in the morning and can the croc tears please); he left thousands of people in the Gulf states waist deep in water begging for help while he, dressed in his $1,000 suit and crisp white shirt, spoke nonsense; he has also squadered our influence with other countries making us a laughing stock when either he, Condi (did you notice that, even at the depths of his influence, they never called Colin Powell Colie) or John Bolton opens his mouth, and he and his master's take on globalization has reduced U.S. Corporate influence to garbage status. If these aren't grounds for Impeachment, I never saw anything which was. However, the "I" word will never happen, and we will have to live through the next 2 1/2 years hoping that when the door of the White House hits George and Laura in the back, there will still be enough, of what made our country wonderful, to put it back together and get back on our feet.

» RE: What defines a Traitor Posted by: theantilib

Comments are closed-

Terrorist event
Posted by: bookwoman on Aug 26, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you think he is going to maneuvor the next one?

» Maneuvoring it, yes... Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

JIM HIGHTOWER, you gotta love this guy
Posted by: bobjbax on Aug 26, 2006 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Way Cool!! I can't add anything to that bill of lading. Well, maybe just a little trivia. Jim mentioned a "trillion dollars". We are, of course, (as John Snow attempted "It's just a number.") numbed by numbers. Great weapon. Always works. To wit: Take one of those phony US Gov dollars out of your pocket. Six inches long. Take a magic marker and make that into a one million dollar bill: $1,000,000.00. Now, go outside and place it down on the roadway. Then, end to end, another, and another, another, another....Keep going until you have laid down one "trillion dollars". Your perspective gained = that line of sequential one million dollar bills is 94.6 miles long!! Go figure. You'll see. More trivia. I' m a bit tired out at the moment so you'll have to mouse this one for the footnotes validating this. I think it was, in 2002, that 'rumdum' Rumsfeld found himself under a bit of pressure on this matter and so quietly made a public admission, hoping it would go away, which, as usual, it did. He admitted that the Pentagram book-keepers had "lost" something over 2 trillion dollars!!! No one was interested in "locating" this mere mind numbing two trillion dollars and they didn't. Not on your life. The Corporatist Inc. that had the "contract" for and did all that book-keeping was later convicted, imagine that, a corporation convicted, but no one punished, for operating a slavery sales outfit out in the big world. They bought and sold human beings to be used as sex slaves and used in 'snuff fillms' for profit. Theirs. Lot's more. You'll find it. I'm sure Jim knows this story a lot better than I do. The Truth is Out There. Thanks for knocking it outa the park again Jim! Bobby Baxter, Veteran & Marijuana Felon

» yo bullwhip Posted by: bobjbax

Comments are closed-

Liberal Party of America
Posted by: timgatto@charter.net on Aug 26, 2006 8:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We agree with everything that has been written here. What is lefty out, is that 22 Democrats voted for this illegal, immorral war. If they would have voted nay with the 19 other democrats, the three republicans, and the independant that voted nay, we wouldn't have this problem. I'm afraid that Herr Bush is going to cause a crisis before the next presidential elections, and just cancel the elections. I'm serious, I believe that he could justify it to himself that he's doing it for our own "protection". I believe that this president is mentally ill. I also believe that he should be held accountable for all of the laws that have been broken. We have lost not only individual freedom's, but he has boosted the power of the executive branch to the level of a dictator. If Bill Clinton had tried that, he would be in jail today. When are we going to demand that he operate inside the law, instead of making up his own laws as he goes? Where are the democrats? In my estimation, we have about 15 real democrats in the Senate. This country can't go on in this way. We will see the fruits of our indeciesiveness with a loss of our liberty.

» 'scuse me, Bullwhip... Posted by: CanuckKid

Comments are closed-

Before the midterm US Elections
Posted by: khokar on Aug 27, 2006 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq an oil rich, democratic and a stable country was invaded by US and for last many years US forces are trying very hard to consolidate their positions to turn this country into an invincible stronghold in the area. If Iraq sole export was only, cucumber and tomatoes, and oil was located some where in central Africa, This would be amazing to watch, US mission, ‘able laureates’ landing in Iraq and occupying it, just to teach democracy. Also further making it an absolute sure by deploying battle ships and forces in the vicinity and barring all other neighbouring countries not to disturb, so that lesson practices to Iraqi go well.
We would be, but only foolish to believe all this;
Arabian countries are sitting on the pits containing world’s crucial fuel energy resources.
The world’s lone super power feels this right full to secure these crucial resources for her best use and to avail an effective Hegemony in this part of the world.
For last some decades, under the coercive western policies in Middle East, the natives and local dictator rulers of these Countries have been fully emasculated and successfully castrated. Whole Middle East is supposed to be playing the only tunes of ---USA.
After tying up almost all the countries in Middle East into western bondage, in some farm or other,-- Iran is found to be the only one odd last obstacle, offering lots of resistances. Iran is surrounded by western strongholds like in Iraq and Afghanistan. These are in full western occupation, ready serving as van guards for any planned next onslaught. But Iran has greater depth and can offer multiple layers of defences and many more other fortifications for the west to converge on to...
The track record of recent US invasion of Iraq shows that US lead forces did not advance into Iraq till chief UN weapon inspector, Dr Hans Blix categorically made it clear that there were no WMDs and there was a little resistance of scud medium range missile in Iraq.
Western forces and its agents are the warrior and conqueror of no-resistance, depleted lands --but they easily get bodged down, like mighty Israeli army in the face of determination and resilience shown by, even a very weak and negligible resistance of Hezbollah in south Lebanon… or Taliban vehemently resisting occupation by US/NATO forces in Afghanistan.
On going media hype of terrorism is another weapon being implied very successfully at home front, to keep the public fear full and scared all the time. This keeps the graph of public opinion up in favour of declared ‘war on terror’. On going exercise of ‘Air planes terror plot’ is also proving to be a fruitful ‘opinion harvester’ and may be kept alive and ripe as a ‘universal tool’ for a long period of time to come.
Al-Qaeda friends are usually, a good helping hand in the up keep of this hype. They can any time come up with their simple video rhetoric to rescue the whole affair. To mark and reaffirm this hype, their next video release may be expected right before the 9/11 anniversary event. Followed by another on dot release by Al,jazeera before midterm election of US senate/ house in November,2006.
Israel Army retreat in the face of Hezbollah resilience in south Lebanon has brought lot of embarrassment for the US. Out of desperation, US attack on Iran, with all her might under any pretext, may be eminent.
In the wake of Hezbollah guerrilla tactic demonstrated in Lebanon, Iran may put up greater resilience and US lead forces are likely to have tough time in the killing fields set up by Iran.
Anyhow, in view of current arrival of forces, to beef up the UNIFIL in Lebanon, and in the light of intriguing statements emerging That Israel ‘may have to go it alone.’"; High altitude air strikes and long range cruise missile attack, may be the preferred Option, to root out the Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH
Posted by: thinkverybig on Aug 23, 2006 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My prediction is that BUSH will be brought up on charges, impeached then jailed for crimes against humanity. And deservingly so. He is by far the world's greatest threat to peace and people need to wake up and realize it. Stop believing the media and stop being programmed by what they want to show you on TV or listen to on the radio. It's all to control the masses and they choose to control by fear, lies and more lies. Bush is no good and people should have listened to Jessie Jackson when he said "Stay out of the Bushes."

Bush has done nothing positive since he's been in office and if history seves correctly, his presidency has been a failure like everything else he's done. Do the research, every business venture or anything Bush has been involved in FAILED. This guy is simply and truly BAD LUCK and America along with the world have been cursed to have this idiot STEAL TWO ELECTIONS.

It's time for a change folks and that time is now. Coming soon is "WeMustChange.org"

Stay tuned for more info or email me if you're interested in volunteering for us.


david@thinkverybig.com

» It's Not About Bush...Or Cheney Posted by: malcolmartin
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Herestratus
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: kizzyjane
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: theantilib
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: kenny453
» You are insane ... Posted by: psudadgrad
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: Cheeky
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: theantilib
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: glorybe

Comments are closed-

NO WAY!
Posted by: TT2 on Aug 23, 2006 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FUN still isn't over!

Not untill the FAT LADY sings!

» RE: NO WAY! Posted by: colinmeister
» Yeah. Posted by: holojojo

Comments are closed-

We only have two months to stop this
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 23, 2006 1:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and Blair both signed off a long time ago on the next phase of this war. It will kick off at the end of the summer holidays. That means any attempt to change this course, will only have September and October to do it.

Blair is isolated in his party and 80 per cent of Brits disagree with his foreign policy. Blair can be removed easily from office if people in his party do it. Equally, in Canada new PM Stephen Harper (a Bush clone), has a minority government. If the Liberals and the NDP get together, they can bring him down quickly. That would be two top tier allies removed from the 'war on terror'. That would be two guys who are intimately involved in the planning, removed.

Now for Bush. It looks like Americans only have the November elections to make a difference. But you can also lean on the Dems to stand up and make some noise. We need new ideas that will build support to stop this.

Remember: only two months. Once the invasion of Iran starts, and the retaliation attacks start on the homeland, it will be a carte blanche for Bush and his plans. And then we will all be signed up for another three years of this.

» This stuff is incendiary Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: This stuff is incendiary Posted by: srqwolf
» Bobsays.. Posted by: aurora2484
» Yeah, think like a Troll Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Cheney
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 23, 2006 2:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney is a peace criminal, war criminal, corporate criminal, propaganda criminal, torture criminal, Vice Presidential criminal, secrecy criminal, congressional criminal, constitutional criminal, electoral criminal, international criminal, murdering criminal, wounding criminal, oil stealing criminal, outing criminal and that's just off the top of my head. He's the worst freak in the whole freaking White House. Tons of impeachment material awaits us if we do the right thing.

» RE: Cheney Posted by: willymack
» RE: Cheney Posted by: krose
» RE: Cheney & Bush Haters Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

I always knew it was bad
Posted by: Lizmv on Aug 23, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But to see all the facts compiled in black and white, all in one place........well, I am really pissed.

But it's not Bush and his cronies that I am pissed about. There is always the danger that a man like Bush can be elected. There is certainly no lack of power seeking sociopaths in the world. To quote David Korten " It is not simply that power corrupts. More to the point, it is the corrupt who are the most highly motivated to seek power." (page 36, The Great Turning).

What REALLY pisses me off is that NONE of our elected representatives in either Congress or the Senate have the balls to get rid of this tyrant! We can rant and rage about Bush, but it is a waste of time and energy. It is the members of Congress and Senate we need to go after.

» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: Steve Adair
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: mrcentrist
» 'Murkin people Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: 'Murkin people Posted by: paulaH
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: I always knew it was bad Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Send this page to your congressperson
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 23, 2006 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of whether or not the fool representing you in Washington is a republican or democrat, send a link to this page to him or her.

If this isn't all we need to impeach all three of these hideous bastards (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) and send them to prison for the rest of their fucking lives then we might as well throw in the towel.

Regardless of how ineffectual your particular democratic candidate may seem to you, the very future of the country depends on your voting for them. AND PLEASE, spare me the barrage of emails about how bot parties are just a tweedle-dee, tweedle dumb, same side of the same tired coin! This is not the time to be foolishly experimenting with a third party. We tried that in 2000 and look where it got us! The only people who benefit by a left-leaning third paty are the GOP. Indeed, Rick Santurum of Pennsylvania has been funding his Green Part opponent - He admitted as much the other night on Hardball with Chris Matthews.

The republican party has:
Cut the throats of the poor and the middleclass,

» (dis)Connectthedots can't read Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Send this page to your congressperson
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 23, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of whether or not the fool representing you in Washington is a republican or democrat, send a link to this page to him or her.

If this isn't all we need to impeach all three of these hideous bastards (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) and send them to prison for the rest of their fucking lives then we might as well throw in the towel.

Regardless of how ineffectual your particular democratic candidate may seem to you, the very future of the country depends on your voting for them. AND PLEASE, spare me the barrage of emails about how bot parties are just a tweedle-dee, tweedle dumb, same side of the same tired coin! This is not the time to be foolishly experimenting with a third party. We tried that in 2000 and look where it got us! The only people who benefit by a left-leaning third paty are the GOP. Indeed, Rick Santurum of Pennsylvania has been funding his Green Part opponent - He admitted as much the other night on Hardball with Chris Matthews.

George W. Bus and the republican party have:
Cut the throats of the poor and the middleclass. They have looted our national treasure. They have abandoned their constituancy in favor of a multi-national corprate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex. They have created a geo-politcal catastrophe in the middle east that will take a century to remedy. They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable slaughterhouse in Iraq. They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden. They have sold our nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder. They have made a mockery of the First Ammendment. They have squandered a five trillion dollar surplus on a tax cut for a class of people who didn't need it. They have gutted vital social programs that aid the poor and the elderly that have been in place for over seventy years. They have turned federal emergancy management into a sick joke. They have knocked the teeth out of laws meant to protect working men and women. They have plundered the environment. They have depleted our educational system. They have hijacked this nation's political dialogue. They have ruined our international reputation. They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fanatics. They have denied voting rights to people of color in three states. They have stolen two national elections. They have pissed on our constitution. They have sent our Bill of Rights through the meat grinder....

They must never, ever be allowed to govern our country again.

The grand old party is over.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

» You are absolutely right Tom.... Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» Hey...Tom and Profit. Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Send this page to your congressperson Posted by: Maureen E. Mellom

Comments are closed-

So what's your point?
Posted by: marklar on Aug 23, 2006 4:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not like Bush has done anything wrong. He's been doing what God has told him to do.

» RE: So what's your point? Posted by: marklar

Comments are closed-

Lincoln Turns in his Grave
Posted by: bullwhip7 on Aug 23, 2006 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all you Bush haters - face it - he's YOUR president. And this means he's the captain of your ship. And this means when you undermine him, you undermine your ship.

I don't don't criticize, monitor or examine. But I do mean keep it civil, professional and cut the BULLCRAP!!!

Illegal war??!!

Go look at the record 98% of your so-called progressive leaders went for it. It's only now that things are tough that they are back tracking - yep don't back a loser seems to be the day's call.

But did you hear what Hillary's new policy is shaping up to be, backed by Dean and Kerry? Universal service - i.e. the draft. Gee, I wonder why they want a lot more soldiers for??

Could it be that if they get elected, they will immediately change their tune and say that "actually we need to stay the course..." Bill Clinton did just that on the economy. He got elected on change, then 2 weeks after the election said - "no, I've decided to stay the course on the economy".

So, yeah.

» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» and another thing Posted by: mazel
» RE: and another thing Posted by: bullwhip7
» bullwhip... Posted by: buffaloT
» B(ofal)o.. Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: B(ofal)o.. Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Abandon Ship then is it? Posted by: bullwhip7
» HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: HE'S NOT *MY* PRESIDENT Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: davidbdr
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: aussidawg
» re-instate the draft! Posted by: scott balogh
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: re-instate the draft! Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave...sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: willymack
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: puckmonkey
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: aussidawg
» pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: pomepuppy visits wikipedia Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Lincoln Turns in his Grave Posted by: mountainmama
» mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: mountainmama
» RE: mountainbabe is on the juice Posted by: theantilib

Comments are closed-

George W. Bush: Killer of Hope, Destroyer of Dreams
Posted by: marklar on Aug 23, 2006 4:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He won't be happy until the spiny thorns growing from his head mature and his forked tounge grows longer and he spits firey venom as he speaks his deathly songs. Then we will all know for sure that he is the anti-Christ. anyone who thinks less of Bush is evil as well.

» I agree Posted by: resistance8
» Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: christininrome
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: babs
» RE: Me too, I agree 100% Posted by: aussidawg

Comments are closed-

out of the frying pan but watch out for the fire
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 23, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
impeach bush, by all means. please. ASAP. but don't forget to include dick, or we'll be in even worse shape than we are now.


Comments are closed-

Sum it up: this is fascism
Posted by: citizenjoe on Aug 23, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some say "oh don't be silly, fascism is a closed terroristic dictatorship,so Bush is a bad guy but not a fascist." That is absolutely false. Fascism was conceived generally to become a freely accepted authoritarian regime of national supremacy, not a tyranny. That is what we have now, although it is a bit tyrannical because it steals from the people and gives to the corporate elite and to Bush's thieving friends. Once more, Bush and Rove and Rumsfeld know that they they fascists every bit as much as many of us know it. They fool you all with their "war against terror". That simply projects the fascist characteristic - a terrorist state-- onto the world. Too bad people know so little history and are so easily fooled. Goebbels was right about that.

» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: taxidave
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» fascism - a bush family value Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: Ocean tides
» RE: Sum it up: this is fascism Posted by: bullwhip7
» Bullwhip clearly is a fascist Posted by: citizenjoe
» Citizenjoe is a rable rouser Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Bush has cost this country and the planet a positive future
Posted by: greentime on Aug 23, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has set us all back a century or more and given the rest of the world permanent reason to close ranks against us.

He is the symbol of all that is wrong with our nation.

He has made America irrelevant.

He didn't do it alone.

He and his father's pals have stolen more, fouled the earth more and robbed the people of this nation and nations around the world of more than we can ever imagine.

He has placed this fragile earth, home to all life, in such serious jeopardy that the harm he unleashed may be irreversible. He has allowed the worst corporate offenders to unleash poisons and genectic organisms that we will spend thousands of years eradicating just to attempt to rebalance our ecosystems.

He has advanced christian radicalism and corporate greed at the very time when tolerance and humility are most called for. We have gone from a "beacon of hope" to the world's worst psychotic bullying citizen. He has divided this country to the point of unrest.

He has empowered the worst bigots with their cowardly beliefs of white racism to unleash their sociopathic behaviors through the very institutions that were created to serve the people. From FEMA to education, from the military to fiscal management, he has botched the job and put the people of this nation and the world in harms way.

There is no reason, not one, to allow him to stay in the office he stole from the people of this nation.


Comments are closed-

otto
Posted by: otto on Aug 23, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great presentation! Thanks!
Otto


Comments are closed-

Fascist_Papers
Posted by: eblack101 on Aug 23, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim,
You are doing great work, but until you can call a spade a spade, you too are still "beating around the Bush".

What you are detailing for us is clearly a fascist corpocracy, but until writers like you are willing to bread through the F-word barrier, Americans continue to be short-changed by even their most progressive pundits and columnists.

Instead we're given words derived from communism(Pravda), monarchy(King George) or generalized conspiracy(cabal), each pundit trying to mark out his OWN PARTICULAR DEFINITION, thus creating a situation analogous to the way the Democratic Party castrates itself...

Divide and be conquered.

Once voting is run by Republican corporations, we are facing corporate fascism. Once fundimentalist churches are recieving money from the governmnet to recruit Republican voters and act as propaganda headquarters, we are dealing with the theocratic wing of the same corporate fascism.

Once the opposition party is utterly dependent on the same foundations, corporations and political groups as the Republicans to maintain their place at the trough, we are dealing with corporate fascism.

Once we have a Pentagon revolving-door, multi-billion dollar military production line run by the very same corporations, we have a military industrial complex that is a central arm of corporate fascism.

Wake up, Jim. Many of our fathers and grandfathers died fighting to see that this same fascism couldn't destroy our country.

If you and your columnist associates will simply identify the problem, and name it and publicize it, the American voter can begin to understand the grave situation he faces, and start the long arduous process of turning America back into the great democracy our Forefathers intended it to be.

You're doing a great job, Jim, but you've got to break through the "F-word" if you really want to stop "beating around the Bush".


Comments are closed-

how long
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 23, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how long before the troops are in the streets? how long before our own september 1? by our votes, by our comments, we reveal ourselves to the enemy. how long before kristallnacht, with the dissenters (ourselves) as the targets? how long?

» Universal Soldier Posted by: Wish
» howard beale, anyone? Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: how long Posted by: yesman
» RE: how long Posted by: willymack

Comments are closed-

Who is to blame for Bush?
Posted by: packofwolves on Aug 23, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and all his cronies should be, and hopefully will be arrested and tried for their crimes, if not here in the U.S. perhaps, hopefully, somewhere else in the world. Would be justice that they would get the same kind of treatment they have given to others. As far as Bush is concerned, it's not his fault he and his associates are allowed to rape our country and kill our young, it's our fault because we're letting them get away with it. How does that saying go, something like Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, shame on me. I personally can't believe anyone could vote for this moron once, let alone twice. Think hard before you vote for someone. Do their promises seem too good to be true, or wishful hoping? If so, then they are lying so you need to investigate. Fact, our taxes will have to be raised to get us out of this awful mess and to provide much needed services for our citizens. Any politician who claims s/he will lower your taxes is lying to you. If you vote for republicans of any kind after this blatant disregard for our country and it's constitution, then what you get is what you deserve. The media is pumping out so much propaganda that it's truly hard to find the truth, if it is even something we can find any more. Education is a right not a privilege for the wealthy. Rules and laws should apply to everyone. Send the children of government officials into the war in Iraq and it will end promptly - start with the Bush kids - they seem to be pretty worthless anyway. IMPEACH BUSH. He is an evil, dry drunk who needs to be put in his place.


Comments are closed-

tedbohne, PhD
Posted by: tedbohne on Aug 23, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though there are some things I didn't know in this litany of what George et al did, If people are going to stand by and let it happen, then why bother? There is a planet load of data out here, both factual and evidential to bring the Bush Regime down by force and now. But, Americans will do nothing, thinking that the electoral system is the way to handle this despite the fact it has been clearly and unequivocally defeated. The Bush Regime has on three occasions now with malice and aforethought and using clearly illegal means in a clandestine fashion, sidestepped the elections. There is an increasing body of data that this will happen again, and then what are Americans going to do? Wait and "vote" in the 2008 joke? In other countries, Bush would be dead by now with his cohorts, family, dogs, cats, houses burnt down, and etc. You know like the jews do to the Palestinians with your tax dollars?

» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: Craig C
» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: krose
» RE: tedbohne, PhD Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Preaching to the Choir
Posted by: Proud Liberal on Aug 23, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we are all wasting energy preaching to the choir on sites such as Alternet, especially all these calls (usually shouted in upper case) to "IMPEACH BUSH."

If we manage to elect a Democratic House in November (and all Democrats support the move...how likely is that?), I suppose it might be possible to impeach Bush. If we also manage to elect a Democratic Senate in November it might then also be possible that the Senate would vote to convict him and remove him from office.

Then what? A President Cheney?

Next, imagine the above scenario repeated to impeach and convict and remove Cheney. Presuming Nancy Pelosi would then be Speaker of the House (and next in the line of succession), she then would become Prez.

Even less likely, you say?

Exactly!

By the time any of the above would happen the Bush/Cheney term would be over anyway. We need to preach less to each other (I include myself) and get out there and elect Democrats to office in November. We've got 2 1/2 months to do it, and then two years in which a Democratic Congress might (hopefully) put the reigns to administration abuses. Spending that time impeaching Bush would assure that nothing else would get done during that time.

» RE: Preaching to the Choir Posted by: willymack
» RE: Preaching to the Choir Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Mid East strategy
Posted by: Edward George on Aug 23, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush League Mid East strategy - Tame hornets by beating nest with stick.

» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: Mid East strategy Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

New World Order
Posted by: DoctorAndy on Aug 23, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And a Masonic shadow governing elite dedicated to its New World Order regardless of what happens to our former Constitutional Republic.

The truth and the people be damned; the end justifies the means in our brave new world!


Comments are closed-

BUSHCO MUST BE STOPPED AND HUNG BY THE NECK
Posted by: Burtonger on Aug 23, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone of these world criminals MUST be prosecuted and sentenced to DEATH for the crimes they commit daily. America may never recover from the crimes they have wontonly commited in america's name around the world .
IF they{BUSHCO} are not prosecuted to the full extent of the law americans will suffer around the world and be held accountable for their leaders crimes. Truth will prevail ,NO MATTER WHAT LAWS ARE CHANGED by these criminals.


Comments are closed-

revolution now
Posted by: thehousedog on Aug 23, 2006 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i urge all americans to take their newspapers, flyswatters, automobiles, farm combines, computer flat screen lcd monitors, ipods, mont blanc pens, cell phones, credit cards, digital cameras, and suv's and throw them at your nearest government office and demand a redress of greviences and impeach our reich-master bush and goon squad. it's time we had real revolution in this country. we should not be afraid of our government - they should be afraid of us (to paraphrase a movie that is coming out sometime in the future). gosh how i hate living in this country right now - so much happiness, success, wealth and money and bliss, and at the same time, so much bad karma associated with these pleasures. we all want to stand up and get things straightened out but who wants to risk the repercussions to personal fortune?

they have us right where they want us.

» RE: revolution now Posted by: Craig C
» RE: revolution now Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: revolution now Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: revolution now Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: revolution now Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Blame it all on Bush
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 23, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would blame most of it on American Ignorance, rather than Bush's Arrogance.

Bush is a symptom of the disease, not the cause.

» RE: Blame it all on Bush Posted by: krose

Comments are closed-

Why are you targets of Terrorists?
Posted by: Canadain Realist on Aug 23, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as the American people continue to elect self serving, greedy neocons into office, the American people will always be the target of Terrorists. Your leaders feel free to attack any country they deem worthy of raping and pilaging, through either war or economic sabotage. While no one can condone the attacks on your World Trade Center this type of activity wil only increase if you don't do something about your leaders. They have even refused to abide by NAFTA rulings (Unless they are in your favour). Why should any people beleive the words of a country that lies and steals as their primary tool of negotiation? Ask yourselves, why you are the target of terrorism and you will see the answewrs to your problems with the world. Until this is done you are just adding fuel to the fires of those who see you as an evil empire. I happen to know that the average American is a good person who wishes to live in a society where everyone is valued. Too bad your leaders make you all look so bad in the eyes of the world. You get what you sow.

» RE: Why are you targets of Terrorists? Posted by: Canadain Realist

Comments are closed-

The best way to
Posted by: NamVeT on Aug 23, 2006 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
get rid of georgie halibush and his pals is one well placed bomb when they are ALL in the White House. Problem solved. Bush & Co. are the fucking terrorists. The only real bummer would be destroying the White House.

» RE: The best way to Posted by: babs
» RE: The best way to Posted by: Craig C
» RE: The best way to Posted by: NamVeT

Comments are closed-

smaltz
Posted by: frenchcanadienne on Aug 23, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Paul Klugman's NY Times piece, "Bush Sets The Science of Governance Back 500 Years" [Aug.23rd, 2006?] Kings had privatized armies [mercenaries], private "tax farmers" [IRS will farm out its collections to private firms]. The old habits of extortion and graft come back. A civil bureaucracy that's accountable to the government will be gone. The republic will be gone, replaced by a feudal nation of crony aristocrats and serfs.

» RE: smaltz Posted by: Craig C

Comments are closed-

rebuttal
Posted by: snat55 on Aug 23, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you have no idea what's coming.you have no idea what an arab mentality is .It is tantamount to nazism.soon you'll see what President Bush means when he says he has to safegaurd our country.Just try to imagine just one Manhattan bus exploding in midtown like they do in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv.Don't tell me it's not going to happen.How many times have they tried? How many times have they been thwarted?It's nice to sit with our starbucks and Times bu thard to face reality.

» RE: rebuttal Posted by: SALLY EVANS
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: babs
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: chomsky
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: rebuttal Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Pomekim likes soldiers Posted by: bullwhip7
» OH REALLY! Posted by: gonzoskismet

Comments are closed-

gandalf
Posted by: groworgo on Aug 23, 2006 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been a storm gathering agaisnt the free world. It began in 1979 when Iran overthrew the US embassy. Since then we have been attacked continuously culminating in the tragedy of 9/11. The UN identified Iraq as the foremost agent in the league of terror. We did what we had to do. We would do it again

No amount of hateful vicous attacks on George Bush can change history, but it is certainly changing the future. People like this malcontent whose oped I am responding to are a boon for the Islamonazis. These people give Al Jazeera and the Islamonazis all the free advertising they need. You are one of Al Quedas most effective recruitment tools

So go ahead and warp facts and bend words and meaning. At least we know that you as well as the Islamofascists, are the enemy of freedom

» RE: gandalf Posted by: Craig C
» RE: gandalf Posted by: DeepThought2
» RE: gandalf Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: gandalf Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: gandalf Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: gandalf Posted by: Aussie Kim
» history began in '79 Posted by: gonzoskismet
» Katrina Response was Good Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Why?
Posted by: syn7hor on Aug 23, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY WHY WHY don't you americans do something?!?!???!?!?! How Bush has any public crediblity AT ALL is absolutely amazing. He's turned your once great and admired country into absolute shit. In Sweden, even those not into politics knows Bush is dumb. How the fuck can you elect someone who can barely speak? HALF the people of your country voted for his SECOND time. Why aren't every goddamn american running around and screaming in the streets?

You rational thinking americans needs to sort this mess out. Unlike in Hitler's Germany, you can speak out! Bush hasn't built enough camps for you guys yet, but please hurry!

Your country is scaring the shit out of the rest of us damnit!

*awaiting the CIA to take me to some secret prison* Fuck'em.

» RE: Why? Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Why? Posted by: symcokid
» RE: Why? Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Why? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Why? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Why? Posted by: syn7hor
» RE: Why? Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Why? Posted by: Solar Wind

Comments are closed-

9-11, 9-11, terruh, stay the course, 9-11, islamofascists,
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Aug 23, 2006 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• If 9/11 was not a 100% inside job, a false flag operation; then a portion of the U.S. government at least knew about the plan for years in advance and allowed/enabled it to happen for their own political gain.

• Al Qaeda, the Taliban, bin Laden, and Hussein were all creations of the CIA. That's not conspiracy theory, that's history.

• "They" don't hate us for our "freedom," they hate us for being warmongering imperialist pirates.

If America would just fucking go home and mind our own business, stop trying to play king-of-the-world, stop trying to force our so-called culture on everyone else on the planet, stop screwing over other countries for our own economic gain, and stop supporting the violent intolerant right-wing theocracy in charge of Israel- the Muslim theocrats would return to their war on bare midriffs. With no credible enemy, they would become irrelevant and eventually rejected by the people of their countries.
Why don't they hate Canada?

• Terrorism kills a trivial number of Americans compared to, say, fatal bee stings and lightning strikes, and you are thousands of times more likely to die in a car crash. They're not fighting a war on terror out of fear, they're creating a fear of terror out of the need for war.

• Bush's America is not an America worth fighting for. As aggressors and war criminals, we're now a legitimate military target. I will not die for a flag whose meaning is now somewhere between the stars-and-bars and the swastika in the eyes of the world. If we are to consider what Israel just did to the people of Lebanon legitimate, then how would your "Islamofascists" killing American people in retaliation for the actions of the Neocons be any different?

• We have our own crazy religious fanatics in this country. A Christian theocracy can be just as bad as a Muslim theocracy. They both want Armageddon, they both want genocide of the infidels. The fascists in DC would never have been able to go on this latest crusade without the support of the flag-waving Jesus freaks. I say fight them over here so we don't have to fight them over there.

• You've obviously bought the shit they've shoveled, you've become exactly what they tried to turn you into for their own selfish aims. You are the kind of Americans the world hates, and when the revolution comes, you will be the second against the wall.

• And the horse you rode in on.


Comments are closed-

Yo bullwhip
Posted by: rollo on Aug 23, 2006 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're rude, you can't spell and your command of 'the truth' is as subjective as anyone's; bring us concrete proof that Gore uttered the words "I invented the internet".

It doesn't exist. Just like the WMDs. And lots of other fictions being visited upon the populace by neocons in CYA mode.

» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: Craig C
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: willymack
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Yo bullwhip Posted by: stevefoagardner
» Yo stevefoamingatmouth Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Craig C
Posted by: Craig C on Aug 23, 2006 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the war is illegal, virtually the entire Congress of the US is guilty, as most of the House and Senate voted to authorize military action if Saddam did not "give up his weapons of mass destruction". The idea that over 5000 artillery shells filled with Sarin derivatives and other types of gasses don't qualify as WMD's is ridiculous. In addition, there were numerous other reasons that justified the war. The fact that Iraqi forces continually fired at patrolling American and British aircraft in the "no fly zone" after the 1991 Gulf War is an easy one. The failure of Iraq to comply with any of the United Nations resolutions passed against Iraq post '91 is another good one. The fact that the Oil for Food program was being used to fill Saddam's coffers with cash instead of helping the Iraqi people is another.
You may not care about what is really right or wrong in the world, but the United States and the Republican Party definitely do.

http//:blogresponder.blogspot.com

» RE: Craig C Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Craig C Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Craig C Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

What can you say?
Posted by: vangogh69 on Aug 23, 2006 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Bush is a criminal who has acted callously on numerous occasions...BUT, he doesn't do so in a vacuum. To the point, the so-called "opposition party" (which you'd do well to check your history on that score if you really believe in em...a hint: the dems were Pro-Slavery, Anti-Reconstruction, and anti-union for a longggggggggggggg time) not only helps Bush & Co. along their merry way, but encourage him with their acquiescence and general tomfoolery. Politically speaking, America is disgusting and as someone stated, neo-fascist. So what can we do to change it?

To start, we have to stop this foolishness about elections and call a spade a spade. We all know the only value either party believes in is $$$$$ and power, fuck the people. We must not dignify their contempt any longer by participating in their humiliation of us. Secondly, we have to take the info about both parties criminality to the streets to inform people (because you'd be surprised just how ignorant Americans really are). We have to get people to connect the "war on terror" to the price of oil, to American consumption of resources, to the American economy, to the capitalist system, and so on. (And we must MOST DEFINATELY get people to brand Israel as an outlaw state and stop funding thier ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.) This is to start...

The situation isn't hopeless for salvation comes from within. We must all work together, be willing to give up our comforts, and work towards change. A better world is possible.


Comments are closed-

A speach or statement that all can join in on
Posted by: Door man on Aug 23, 2006 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been hard pressed not to simply gripe and find no way of expressing anything hopeful for the Democrats or Independants who run against this Republican machine. This is an awful jaugernaut that needs to be addressed headon and offer an alternative. here is my first hit at it..... please think to add and join in a statement to begin a new way of thinking.

When I was at the Democratic booth at the County Fair here, we were asking people to write down on a large pad - what their concerns were.

A fellow came to the booth (a union carpenter) and said that he'd just as soon tell us what he thinks. He said he was sick and tired of hearing about 911 and the threat of terrorism. He said he doesn't even listen to the news anymore because he is convinced of hearing more lies.

He went on for a bit - It occurred to me that this fellow is definitely not alone in this country and that if we had the leadership in this country to take these guys head on by asking the American people to stand up and truly be counted to answer these policies - To say - It is tragedy what the Neo-con Bush, Cheney and company have done to our credibility and honor throughout the world we would find a ready audience. It is a disgrace to find that in 6 short years this administration has used the phantom of 911 to justify a steady barrage on human and civil rights not only in the pursuit of an illegally conjured war but against American citizens as well – to nearly bankrupt this country of it’s standing in the world diplomatically, economically, and weaken our military capabilities as well.

It makes no sense for us to berate and attempt to shout down this bankrupt administration that seeks to obfuscate and change reality to fit their won sordid agenda. It is time to empower YOU, The American citizen to stand up and tell these outlaws what kind of America you want to be a part of. Americans are not a weak and frightened people hiding under beds waiting for an imaginary terrorist to attack.... We (the citizens) engaged in this grand experiment of Democracy are the leaders that carry the light in the world - The light that allows others, less fortunate, less able to fight, to see and follow our example. It is not the light of a cannon fire blowing into the homes of Iraqis and Lebanese to force change or suffer the wrath of an Empire.

We cannot believe that the American wants to be seen as the strongest, most powerful bully in this world – but rather the compassionate, nurturing, helpful and confident peacemaker.

Which will it be - America?

I am not a speech writer - but we have to come up with bold statements and then be ready for the onslaught of these control freak mucks - and blast them back with the confidence that we are right.

Forget about pandering to the patriotic cause. Dismiss it! For anyone to impugn another’s patriotism because he or she does not believe in killing 1000 to save one, is indefensible! It should not be tolerated. Patriotism is preserving the rapidly eroding values and commitments to freedom we once had. Patriotism is stopping this administration from destroying what they have already horribly injured. It is regaining our honor, integrity and hope we provided for the world and our own citizens... Let's take it back.


Comments are closed-

BUSH KNEW FROM THE BEGINNING IRAQ HAD NO WMD'S
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 23, 2006 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Worse yet, BUSH AND COMPANY KNEW FROM THE BEGINNING IRAQ HAD NO WMD'S. And, there are lots of stories and evidence to support this. When the WTC was hit, Bush tried to order subordinates to link it to Sadaam. He told his CIA chief to link Sadaam with terrorists. Now, Bush tried everything in the book. But you will not see this on Fox or CNN. But why? Well this article answers part of the question. What this means is that the criminal malfesance is even deeper, the contempt for world opinion even greater then what we imagined. As for Clinton and what he supposedly knew, whatever he did know was never enough to go to war with Iraq, was it? The facts speak for themselves.


Comments are closed-

Misleading..........
Posted by: R.A. on Aug 23, 2006 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Since leaving Halliburton to become George Bush's vice-president, I've severed all of my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interest. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."
Former CEO Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, September 2003

Annual payments that Cheney has received from Halliburton since he's been vice-president:
2001: $205,298
2002: $162,392
2003: $178,437
2004: $194,852
2005: $211,465
Cash bonus paid to Cheney by Halliburton just before he took office: $1.4 million
Retirement package he was given in 2000 after only 5 years as CEO: $20 million


Too bad this article doesn't mention that this is deferred compensation that is set in stone and is independent of the company’s performance. (I might give it more credence if it did.)

A factcheck.org article took on the so-called "ties" Cheney still has to the company:

http://www.factcheck.org/article261.html

This is an analysis of a campaign ad from 2004.

On the subject of his deferred compensation: "The $398,548 Halliburton has paid to Cheney while in office is all deferred compensation, a common practice that high-salaried executives use to reduce their tax bills by spreading income over several years. In Cheney's case, he signed a Halliburton form in December of 1998 choosing to have 50% of his salary for the next year, and 90% of any bonus money for that year, spread out over five years. (As it turned out, there was no bonus for 1999.) We asked Cheney's personal attorney to document the deferral agreement as well, and he supplied us with a copy of the form , posted here publicly for the first time.

Legally, Halliburton can't increase or reduce the amount of the deferred compensation no matter what Cheney does as vice president. So Cheney's deferred payments from Halliburton wouldn't increase no matter how much money the company makes, or how many government contracts it receives.

On the other hand, there is a possibility that if the company went bankrupt it would be unable to pay. That raises the theoretical possibility of a conflict of interest -- if the public interest somehow demanded that Cheney take action that would hurt Halliburton it could conceivably end up costing him money personally. So to insulate himself from that possible conflict, Cheney purchased an insurance policy (which cost him$14,903) that promises to pay him all the deferred compensation that Halliburton owes him even if the company goes bust and refuses to pay. The policy does contain escape clauses allowing the insurance company to refuse payment in the unlikely events that Cheney files a claim resulting "directly or indirectly" from a change in law or regulation, or from a "prepackaged" bankruptcy in which creditors agree on terms prior to filing. But otherwise it ensures Cheney will get what Halliburton owes him should it go under.


On his stock options: "That still would leave the possibility that Cheney could profit from his Halliburton stock options if the company's stock rises in value. However, Cheney and his wife Lynne have assigned any future profits from their stock options in Halliburton and several other companies to charity. And we're not just taking the Cheney's word for this -- we asked for a copy of the legal agreement they signed, which we post here publicly for the first time.

The "Gift Trust Agreement" the Cheney's signed two days before he took office turns over power of attorney to a trust administrator to sell the options at some future time and to give the after-tax profits to three charities. The agreement specifies that 40% will go to the University of Wyoming (Cheney's home state), ....(see link for rest)

» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: R.A.
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: Jim Shaw
» RE: Misleading.......... Posted by: R.A.

Comments are closed-

NONSENSE THAT IRAQ HAD WMD'S
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 23, 2006 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so-called artillery shells with Sarin residue were remnants of the war with Iran. They were regarded as so old or in such poor condition as to be undeliverable. BUT HERE IS THE PROOF - It is accepted in American Media everywhere, including Fox, CNN, MSNBC that Iraq had no WMD's. If the so-called artillery shells story really panned out, wouldn't this be big news? EVEN PRESIDENT BUSH now says Iraq had no WMD's. Cut the nonsense.

» Wouldn't this be big news Posted by: DoctorAndy

Comments are closed-

We have met the enemy and the enemy is us
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 23, 2006 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never have I read a commentary that with minimal partisan mudslinging so succinctly captures the facts of life in our post-911 world — the facts as they are construed on Pennsylvania Avenue, that is. True, in a time of war sacrifices can't be entirely avoided; namely, fewer personal rights in the interest of preserving national security. On the other hand, the irony does not escape me that in the name of providing freedom for faraway nations, we have begun to loosen our grasp upon our own American birthright.

Even if we are to assume that the rise of secrecy and the demise of public access and government accountability is a necessary price to pay during wartime, one can only hope and pray that we do not continue to become entangled in military conflicts abroad. If the loss of our national identity, personal freedoms and customary checks-and-balances are the price we must pay for “security”, so too should we recognize that the more intrusive sacrifices we make the more likely we are to fall upon our own sword — and in so doing handing the enemies of democracy and liberty a victory wherein the only guilty party is ourselves..

Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “There is nothing to fear, but fear itself.” Fear, by its very definition, is reactionary and shortsighted. Fear leads to haste. Haste leads to unquestioning loyalty, which is often defended as one's "patriotic duty". Poor leadership, in turn, leads to the erosion of our Constitution. The erosion of our Constitution leads to legislation from the bench. The weakening of our justice system leads to the loss of civil rights. Total cost? The American Dream. Value? Priceless.

Perhaps that's why Benjamin Franklin wisely observed, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Any psychologist will tell you that security is an illusion. A sense of security is a coping mechanism that prevents most people from becoming paralyzed by fear on a day-to-day basis. It keeps us from contemplating the odds of slipping on a patch of ice, drowning in a swift storm current, being pinned in by wildfire, ripped from our homes by a hurricane or tornado, slipping in the shower, attacked by roaming dogs, hospitalized with severe food poisoning, assault by a mugger, struck down by illness or long-term disability — or, heaven forbid — wiped out by a dirty bomb explosion. Death happens. The when, where and how is not up to us. What IS within our legitimate concern and control is whether or not we have a Constitution or a democratic Republic when the secrecy-pushers are through with the courts, Congress and the Constitution itself. If we are going to fear for the future, fear what harm fear itself can breed.

Shakespeare had it right when he wrote: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves.”


Comments are closed-

Support for Data
Posted by: nhilbourn on Aug 23, 2006 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know Jim Hightower has written a book on the Bush Administration's black glove operations, but still, I would've liked to see some citations of where he got the data for his article from.

It would help to calm souls like mine which seem to long for works cited pages.

Maybe just links within the article. That would've been nice.

» RE: Support for Data Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Just one question
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 23, 2006 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has mostly done pretty well when it joins wars _after_ they have started - riding into the fray, as it were, and coming to the rescue. Hence the slavish loyalty of governments like mine. (no disrespect intended to those who helped fight for us and others)

But has the US done _any_ good AT ALL in any of the wars it ever declared on other countries?

» RE: Just one question Posted by: anapple
» RE: Just one question Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Just one question Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: Just one question Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Just one question Posted by: bullwhip7
» World's biggest cowards Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: World's biggest cowards Posted by: bullwhip7
» RE: World's biggest cowards Posted by: Aussie Kim

Comments are closed-

Vote of "No Confidence" in e-Voting Era [Calling all techies]
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 24, 2006 1:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can Americans wise up in the voting booth if the technology used to record our votes surpasses our prevailing tech literacy, thereby limiting our usefulness in "keeping them honest"?

Sadly, I have little confidence in the electoral process now that it has gone digital. Whether we're talking George W. Bush or someone else who equally offends American tradition and sensibility at some point in the future, how do we oust them on Election Day when the average American can't even get a paper audit? Should we start a campaign to vote absentee only?

Cheaters who want to cheat will find a way to do it, regardless. Unfortunately, technology leaves more opportunities to "cover one's tracks" without the general public catching on. By contrast, common sense dictates that the easiest type of vote to validate is the lowest tech type — the type that is so straightforward that a child can recognize tampering. The worst confusion you are going to get with a paper ballot, for example, is a "hanging chad." By contrast, check out the work of two Harvard PhDs that founded www.blackboxvoting.org, and also wrote a related book "Spychips: How Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID" (www.spychips.com). These sites blow wide open the idea that technology, in general, is secure. Whether the threat is viral — the same sort that infects your PC with Spyware — or personal, say a disgruntled e-voting employee who has been offered a handsome bribe for reprogramming all "No" votes for Mr. Smith to become "Yes" votes, the opportunities for foul play and mechanical breakdown are enormous. Modern day computer technology has exceeded or wisdom to deal with it appropriately. We have, in essence, opened Pandora's Box. Now that the lid is off, you can be sure that a 13-year-old hacker won't be the only one tempted to exploit it.

Technology-wise, we are living in the sociological equivalent of the Wild West. Problem? There aren't enough technologically literate sheriffs to patrol the digital landscape. And much like the Old West, “digital homesteaders” with the technological literacy to stop lawlessness are few and far between. Thus, as long as bona fide law enforcement and government agencies fall short of the necessary numbers to reign in technology gone wild, the responsibility for law, order and accountability lies in OUR HANDS — those that are technologically proficient and/or employed in such areas, that is. Thus, I would urge the hired hands working this New Frontier not to hack for malicious purposes, but to carefully scan their slice of the digital horizon for signs that those in power — in particular companies that supply technology for e-voting and other “public trust” state, federal and local uses are held in check. In this way, in the event that a real conspiracy is hatched, someone will be there to toll the warning bell or leak the necessary documentation to the press.

More than just informed voters, this country needs the help of ordinary Americans who realize that their eyes and ears account for a piece of the puzzle that forms the Big Picture. Already, some of the high-ranking employees of e-voting companies have been "outed" by the media for having been convicted of various felonies that should preclude such employment. Nevertheless, some e-voting spokespeople have gone on record promising to "deliver the election" to a local or national candidate. As yourself: Would anyone in their right mind make that claim if they were NOT rigging the vote? (Hiding in plain sight?) To prevent such blatant disregard for the Public Trust, this post is a call to all poll workers and techs, particularly those that hold jobs in critical "public access": Keep your eyes peeled and document everything no matter how insignificant it may seem at the time. You never know when you might be called upon to be part of the solution.


Comments are closed-

Convince the Unconvinced, Jim! Cite Sources, Use Footnotes!
Posted by: NewsView on Aug 24, 2006 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To echo a previous post, I too would like to see more citations so that when I email this page to my conservative or non-news reading friends and family they don't go into knee-jerk shock and denial and respond by accusing the author, Jim Hightower, of inventing these alarming collection of facts and stats about the Bush administration.

For people who are regular media “consumers” — the minority of Americans who are likely to post or read from a site like this — this information on President George W. Bush and VP Cheney may come as no great surprise. But keep in mind that one of the reasons we have a corrupt political landscape is because we have a bankrupt civic landscape. No one who isn’t already politically receptive to this sort of subject matter will accept the “difficult truth.” For the same reason, I predict that no punitive action will be taken against the Bush presidency now or ever. We are no longer living in the Watergate era or even the Bill Clinton era. Americans are tired of investigations and apathetic towards questions of character, lawfulness and morality.

The typical response you’ll get from people who dislike what they read or hear is that the author of the offending news or commentary item is a part of the “vast media conspiracy”. This excuses your average citizen from paying serious attention to the issues that are deserving of public scrutiny. Never mind that this "conspiracy" is simultaneously a left-wing media conspiracy and a right-wing media conspiracy. Like the lead character on Discovery Channel’s “Myth Busters” — who oftentimes wears a shirt that reads, “I reject your reality and substitute my own”, most Americans of opposing political inclination or political apathy simply WON'T accept the facts — and to whatever extent this colors their thinking they will reject these facts in favor of their own desired perceptions. For the same reason, few Americans are going to do their own homework to verify whether someone like Jim Hightower has reported his findings honestly. It's far easier to simply slap a label of “political bias” on any reality that contradicts their notions and go about their business — including their next trip into a voting booth — completely unchanged no matter how blatant or overt the crimes of character or political crisis becomes.

Americans are seeing the results of poor political leadership because too many voters — if they bother to vote at all — have become so politically shallow, lazy and partisan that we do not respond to any truth that does not fall within partisan lines or jive with the impression we get from a few televised debates. So numb are most people to the truth that they would even go so far as to deny calls for investigation in order to continue towing the party line unimpeded by doubt or dissent. The only thing that might be a little tougher to deny would be the sort of citations and references you find in a book or scholarly journal. Newspaper and Website quotations are no longer enough — writers need to pepper their news items and commentary with multiple footnotes to start making inroads with an increasingly distrustful public. Likewise, Jim Hightower needs references, citations and as many links to credible news sources as possible — not to preach to the choir but to reach the unconvinced who are too lazy, frightened or partisan to search out the facts for themselves.


Comments are closed-

Why does This all remind me of...
Posted by: Verdillac on Aug 24, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revenge of the Sith?

I almost expect Bush to pull off his mask revealing Emperor Palpatine beneath declaring total Executive Power over the Universe. Oh, Yoda, with your lightsaber, Need You We Do! MmmMM?

Things could get really bad really fast after November. We may seriously have to consider living up to the Declaration of Independence and rise up again.
Of course if one were to ask the NRA, they will say "there's nothing wrong you tree-hugging peaceniks!" Not one of them has sqeaked about the threats made and carried out against the OTHER amendments! It might be funny to watch their reaction when their membership data base is used to round them up first...the ones with traceable addresses, who belong to a firearms club..I know that would be my first move, if I were a power-hungry fascist.
Look out NRA, Bush will get you too! He probably ALREADY knows where you live and how many weapons you have. Think about that!


Comments are closed-

SageStarr
Posted by: timrowan on Aug 24, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Hightower missed one. This factoid comes from "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill" by Ron Suskind, about the former Alcoa CEO's two frustrating years as Bush's mostly ignored Treasury Secretary.

Date on which invading Iraq was first discussed at a George W. Bush Cabinet meeting: January 30, 2001, day 10 of his first term.


Comments are closed-

Bush & the forces of evil
Posted by: show me the truth on Aug 24, 2006 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As stated in many books...the attack of 9/11 was a gift to the white house and the henchmen who yank Bush's chains. The war on terror had nothing to do with Iraq....this plan was drawn up and Clinton was asked to give the ok which he refused to do.
It was all about spreading America's influence in the world which of course has suffered severve damage and they have lost all credibility in the world. Why should there be democracy in Iraq and not in Saudi Arabia? Hypocracy to say the least.
Bush is oil and the saudies are oil....their is no democracy in America anyway...it is just a facade and the millions are ruled by lobbyists and the rich for the benefit of the rich ... they don't care how mant American boys get killed


Comments are closed-

Parable
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Aug 24, 2006 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what happens when 'fools rush in.'

» Wasp's Nest Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

EXCLUSIVE: NEW CONVERSATION PICKED UP ON OVAL OFFICE PHONE
Posted by: TheStranger on Aug 24, 2006 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DIGGING DEEPER
By Ivan G. Goldman

--Mama, I made a big mess.

--That’s ok, dear. Just get the servants to clean it up.

--No, mama, I tried that.

--That’s what I tell your father. You can’t get decent help anymore. What kind of mess are we talking about, anyway? Ketchup, a coke bust? What?

--Iraq, mama. The one with the ‘q’ at the end.

--Oh, that. Listen, Iraq’s not nearly as terrible as everybody says. Watch Fox, dear, like I told you.

--I do, mama.

--Iraq’s a lot like Katrina.

--That’s what everybody says.

--Those Iraqis are just like all those colored people they showed complaining about everything down there. Listen, those Arabs live much better than they did before we bombed the crap out of them. Money just pours into the place. Cheney wets his beak, everything’s coming up roses.

--But they say a lot of American troops got killed and burned and everything.

--Really. Do you know any of them?

--No.

--Me neither. They’d be out on the street if we hadn’t given them a paycheck.

--But mama, they’re dead and missing arms and legs and stuff.

--Yeah? Well listen, kid, grow some backbone. Those oil fields we grabbed over there will be worth a mint someday. So forget about it. Clear some brush or something. Cheney will watch the store. From his bunker, I mean.

--Okay, mama. But can’t you stop everybody from making fun of me?

--You little squirt. Stop whining. I told your father a thousand times we shoulda let Jeb inherit the presidency. That’s what the Godfather did. But your father? He knew better. Passed up Michael and gave the job to Fredo.

--Huh?

--Ride your SUV around the ranch. And be sure to practice saying ‘Bring it on’ in the mirror. It’ll make you feel masculine. Too bad it won’t make you smart.

--Huh?

[From http://ivangoldman.blogspot.com/]


Comments are closed-

Der Fuhrer Bush
Posted by: CONSPIRACYNUT on Aug 24, 2006 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My bet is that before the next election there will be another terrorist event of some type that will give Bush the excuse he is looking for to declare martial law and remain president.

» Another Conspiracy!!!! Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

Let's give it a chance now!
Posted by: talkville on Aug 24, 2006 11:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aww, come on! We're only a little over 6 1/2 years into this glorious, awesome New American Century. Just think about it, there's about 93 years or so of more fun and surprises -- and oh, so much 'democracy'! Meanwhile, there's a name - Iraq - looking for a country... ooops! I think I heard Caligula whispering.


Comments are closed-

ECLECTICIST , S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Aug 26, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OUR FAMILY HAS READ YOUR BOOK ON THE DISGRACEFUL BUSH FAMILY, ESPECIALLY BUSH "SILVERFOOT" 43...THE READING OF THE MESSAGE 'S "IN BETWEEN THE LINES" OR DIRECTLY STATING OF THE EVIL ACTIONS TAKEN BY BUSH 43 HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY THE AMERICAN PUBLIC...

EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE IMPLIED THE MEANING OF THE OLD MILITARY ADAGE OF " B-O-H-I-C-A", NO ONE IS LISTENING...SO TRY AGAIN, AGAIN, AND AGAIN...
AND YOU ARE OFFERING THE PROVERBIAL FIX OF THE "VASELINE" BEFORE THE RAPE, YOU MAY ADVISE THE USE OF THE NEW PRODUCTS LIKE WD-40, LIQUID WRENCH, ETC, TO EASE THE INSERTION EVENT...AS MARK TWAIN ONCE REMARKED :

"IT CAN PROBABLY BE SHOWN BY FACTS AND FIGURES THAT THERE IS NO DISTINCTLY NATIVE AMERICAN CRIMINAL CLASS EXCEPT CONGRESS."

AND, SOME ADDITIONAL EXCERPTS THAT AID INDENTIFYING THE UNSCRUPULOUS BUSH 43 :

See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda. GEORGE W. BUSH

Regrettably, empirical studies reveal, however, that authoritarians are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral. They are also often conservatives without conscience who are capable of plunging this nation into disasters the likes of which we have never known. JOHN DEAN 7/22/06

“By the time Richard Milhous Nixon goes on trial in the Senate, the only real reason for trying him will be to understand how he ever became president of the United States at all ... and the real defendant, at that point, will be the American Political System. “ -- Hunter S. Thompson, 1973.(WHAT ABOUT BUSH 43???)

ALSO, GEORGE BERNARD SHAW CLEARLY DESCRIBES
BUSH 43 MENTALITY:

He knows nothing and thinks he knows everything. That points clearly to a political career. -

He who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways, will receive anything from the Lord. Let the lowly brother boast in his exaltation, and the rich in his humiliation, because like the flower of the grass he will pass away. James 1: 1-15

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++


Comments are closed-

What defines a Traitor
Posted by: bookwoman on Aug 26, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luckily for the GOP, they made Impeachment a bad word. The American people will not stand for another travesty such as they dragged Bill Clinton through. Its too bad that "W" can't be considered for Impeachment for Treason. He has squandered our economic worth with his stupid unnecessary war; he has caused the death of 2500 American plus countless Iraqis(how do you look at yourself in the morning and can the croc tears please); he left thousands of people in the Gulf states waist deep in water begging for help while he, dressed in his $1,000 suit and crisp white shirt, spoke nonsense; he has also squadered our influence with other countries making us a laughing stock when either he, Condi (did you notice that, even at the depths of his influence, they never called Colin Powell Colie) or John Bolton opens his mouth, and he and his master's take on globalization has reduced U.S. Corporate influence to garbage status. If these aren't grounds for Impeachment, I never saw anything which was. However, the "I" word will never happen, and we will have to live through the next 2 1/2 years hoping that when the door of the White House hits George and Laura in the back, there will still be enough, of what made our country wonderful, to put it back together and get back on our feet.

» RE: What defines a Traitor Posted by: theantilib

Comments are closed-

Terrorist event
Posted by: bookwoman on Aug 26, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you think he is going to maneuvor the next one?

» Maneuvoring it, yes... Posted by: bullwhip7

Comments are closed-

JIM HIGHTOWER, you gotta love this guy
Posted by: bobjbax on Aug 26, 2006 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Way Cool!! I can't add anything to that bill of lading. Well, maybe just a little trivia. Jim mentioned a "trillion dollars". We are, of course, (as John Snow attempted "It's just a number.") numbed by numbers. Great weapon. Always works. To wit: Take one of those phony US Gov dollars out of your pocket. Six inches long. Take a magic marker and make that into a one million dollar bill: $1,000,000.00. Now, go outside and place it down on the roadway. Then, end to end, another, and another, another, another....Keep going until you have laid down one "trillion dollars". Your perspective gained = that line of sequential one million dollar bills is 94.6 miles long!! Go figure. You'll see. More trivia. I' m a bit tired out at the moment so you'll have to mouse this one for the footnotes validating this. I think it was, in 2002, that 'rumdum' Rumsfeld found himself under a bit of pressure on this matter and so quietly made a public admission, hoping it would go away, which, as usual, it did. He admitted that the Pentagram book-keepers had "lost" something over 2 trillion dollars!!! No one was interested in "locating" this mere mind numbing two trillion dollars and they didn't. Not on your life. The Corporatist Inc. that had the "contract" for and did all that book-keeping was later convicted, imagine that, a corporation convicted, but no one punished, for operating a slavery sales outfit out in the big world. They bought and sold human beings to be used as sex slaves and used in 'snuff fillms' for profit. Theirs. Lot's more. You'll find it. I'm sure Jim knows this story a lot better than I do. The Truth is Out There. Thanks for knocking it outa the park again Jim! Bobby Baxter, Veteran & Marijuana Felon

» yo bullwhip Posted by: bobjbax

Comments are closed-

Liberal Party of America
Posted by: timgatto@charter.net on Aug 26, 2006 8:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We agree with everything that has been written here. What is lefty out, is that 22 Democrats voted for this illegal, immorral war. If they would have voted nay with the 19 other democrats, the three republicans, and the independant that voted nay, we wouldn't have this problem. I'm afraid that Herr Bush is going to cause a crisis before the next presidential elections, and just cancel the elections. I'm serious, I believe that he could justify it to himself that he's doing it for our own "protection". I believe that this president is mentally ill. I also believe that he should be held accountable for all of the laws that have been broken. We have lost not only individual freedom's, but he has boosted the power of the executive branch to the level of a dictator. If Bill Clinton had tried that, he would be in jail today. When are we going to demand that he operate inside the law, instead of making up his own laws as he goes? Where are the democrats? In my estimation, we have about 15 real democrats in the Senate. This country can't go on in this way. We will see the fruits of our indeciesiveness with a loss of our liberty.

» 'scuse me, Bullwhip... Posted by: CanuckKid

Comments are closed-

Before the midterm US Elections
Posted by: khokar on Aug 27, 2006 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq an oil rich, democratic and a stable country was invaded by US and for last many years US forces are trying very hard to consolidate their positions to turn this country into an invincible stronghold in the area. If Iraq sole export was only, cucumber and tomatoes, and oil was located some where in central Africa, This would be amazing to watch, US mission, ‘able laureates’ landing in Iraq and occupying it, just to teach democracy. Also further making it an absolute sure by deploying battle ships and forces in the vicinity and barring all other neighbouring countries not to disturb, so that lesson practices to Iraqi go well.
We would be, but only foolish to believe all this;
Arabian countries are sitting on the pits containing world’s crucial fuel energy resources.
The world’s lone super power feels this right full to secure these crucial resources for her best use and to avail an effective Hegemony in this part of the world.
For last some decades, under the coercive western policies in Middle East, the natives and local dictator rulers of these Countries have been fully emasculated and successfully castrated. Whole Middle East is supposed to be playing the only tunes of ---USA.
After tying up almost all the countries in Middle East into western bondage, in some farm or other,-- Iran is found to be the only one odd last obstacle, offering lots of resistances. Iran is surrounded by western strongholds like in Iraq and Afghanistan. These are in full western occupation, ready serving as van guards for any planned next onslaught. But Iran has greater depth and can offer multiple layers of defences and many more other fortifications for the west to converge on to...
The track record of recent US invasion of Iraq shows that US lead forces did not advance into Iraq till chief UN weapon inspector, Dr Hans Blix categorically made it clear that there were no WMDs and there was a little resistance of scud medium range missile in Iraq.
Western forces and its agents are the warrior and conqueror of no-resistance, depleted lands --but they easily get bodged down, like mighty Israeli army in the face of determination and resilience shown by, even a very weak and negligible resistance of Hezbollah in south Lebanon… or Taliban vehemently resisting occupation by US/NATO forces in Afghanistan.
On going media hype of terrorism is another weapon being implied very successfully at home front, to keep the public fear full and scared all the time. This keeps the graph of public opinion up in favour of declared ‘war on terror’. On going exercise of ‘Air planes terror plot’ is also proving to be a fruitful ‘opinion harvester’ and may be kept alive and ripe as a ‘universal tool’ for a long period of time to come.
Al-Qaeda friends are usually, a good helping hand in the up keep of this hype. They can any time come up with their simple video rhetoric to rescue the whole affair. To mark and reaffirm this hype, their next video release may be expected right before the 9/11 anniversary event. Followed by another on dot release by Al,jazeera before midterm election of US senate/ house in November,2006.
Israel Army retreat in the face of Hezbollah resilience in south Lebanon has brought lot of embarrassment for the US. Out of desperation, US attack on Iran, with all her might under any pretext, may be eminent.
In the wake of Hezbollah guerrilla tactic demonstrated in Lebanon, Iran may put up greater resilience and US lead forces are likely to have tough time in the killing fields set up by Iran.
Anyhow, in view of current arrival of forces, to beef up the UNIFIL in Lebanon, and in the light of intriguing statements emerging That Israel ‘may have to go it alone.’"; High altitude air strikes and long range cruise missile attack, may be the preferred Option, to root out the Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...