Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Real Thing Is Getting So Hard to Find

By Jay Walljasper, Ode. Posted August 21, 2006.


High-powered technology can manipulate reality and disseminate falsehoods on a scale never before seen.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jay Walljasper

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Victoria Beckham, also known to the world as Posh of the Spice Girls, was giving a performance for fans in Birmingham, England, and accidentally dropped the microphone. Her voice, however, continued ringing out of the speakers as if by magic. But it wasn't magic; Posh was lip-synching to a pre-recorded track. As if that weren't insincere enough, the lip ring she wore also turned out to be fake. Posh hadn't really pierced herself like so many of her young fans... she just wanted them to think so.

It's difficult to know what's real anymore. Politicians deceive us. Corporations cover up misdeeds with frothy PR. Photoshop makes it simple to fake photographs. Breast implants and facelifts are as common as Band-Aids.

This is nothing new. The pages of history are filled with stories of fraud going back at least as far as the Trojan Horse. The difference today is that high-powered technology can manipulate reality and disseminate falsehoods on a scale never before seen.

In response to this onslaught, it's easy to become cynical about almost everything. Yet rather than throwing up our hands and accepting a world that feels faux, many of us are rolling up our sleeves to maintain what's honest in our lives. American social scientist Paul Ray calls this as a historic social development. "Authenticity is so much in demand today," he declares.

Ray became fascinated by the subject through his research on "cultural creatives"--a sizable segment of the population he has identified who share common values about the environment, social justice, creative expression and personal growth. After extensive interviews with numbers of them, Ray uncovered another trait cultural creatives hold in common: a drive for authenticity. This means living in a way that "your inner self matches your outer self," he says.

Veteran British journalist and trend spotter David Boyle also sees the emergence of a new social sensibility based upon "a determined rejection of the fake, the virtual, the spun and the mass-produced.

"There is an obsession on all levels about what is real and what is fake," he notes in a recent interview. "At its core it is a search for what's still human in business, in politics, in culture and in our own lives."

Boyle sees our growing yearning for authenticity as a factor in the recent boom of organic and local food, holistic medicine and socially responsible business. He also points to the worldwide success of the raw Detroit blues-rock duo The White Stripes, the resurgence of public poetry in the UK and the popularity of vintage fabrics from fashion designer Stella McCartney as precursors of a coming "authenticity revolution."

In his book Authenticity: Brands, Fakes, Spin and the Lust for Real Life, Boyle describes nine kinds of values that inspire us to seek out what's genuine in the world: ethical, natural, honest, simple, unspun, sustainable, beautiful, rooted and human.

You see people everywhere making choices that once would have seemed surprising. Forgoing a fancy holiday to embark on an eco-travel adventure or a volunteer vacation helping out in a poor community. Skipping the mall in favor of funky furnishings and fashions from thrift stores or handicraft shops. Deciding against a new house on the edge of town to take part in revitalizing an older neighbourhood. Tuning out powerful entertainment conglomerates in order to discover avant-garde, locally made or exotic artistic alternatives. Steering clear of the high-flying corporate track for a lower-paying career with more satisfaction.

"People feel contradictions more sharply than a generation ago," Boyle explains. "They are less willing to work for a company they dislike, or invest their pensions there, or buy their products. Businesses know this, but it's hard for a company to actually be authentic when it is big, globalized and virtual."

As hard as it may be, embracing authenticity represents the wisest, brightest future for business, according to Neil Crofts--a former British publishing executive, race-car driver and corporate-strategy specialist who founded the Authentic Business website.

The key to authentic business, and an authentic life, in Crofts' view, is knowing that some things matter more than money. "If you are doing something you believe in passionately and it fits with your talents, you will always do it better and you will attract the support of others," he asserts. "You will not only make more money, you'll be happier."


Digg!

Jay Walljasper is the executive editor of Ode Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
authenticity
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 21, 2006 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, authenticity is quite valuable. We can see this most clearly in our unauthentic presidency which is bringing such pain and suffering to us and the world. End this pain and suffering by impeaching the Bushie criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

post post haste
Posted by: marklar on Aug 21, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fema under Michael Brown and George Bush was more concerned with it's public relations and image than it was with saving lives. That can be more or less said to a lesser degree of Landreau and Blanco as well. Corporations and the U.S. governement (= fascism) are masters of deception. From Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which was all about lies, the petroleum company green ads, we are mired neck deep in a new country called Bullshit America and it gets deeper by the minute. Maybe the reason YOUTUBE is so successful is that people can post unfiltered reality along side with corporate and government bulshitters and we get to see the stark contrasts between reality and Maccaca. Freedom of expression and freedom itself will never die, like water it will find a way to keep flowing.
Corporations will never stop the bullshit though. I'm just waiting for corporations to come up with a way to decieve us by selling a virtual orgasm. Maybe this would do it; for $69.95 in a sultry mall store you could buy a pair of jeans warm and moist in the right spot and associate the feeling with the sweating and writhing hot bodies in posters on the walls and a note on the price tag that prompts a thought in your head that says you just got laid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» mainline religion Posted by: doctorsquared
Authenticity is a return to human values.
Posted by: shangrilalad on Aug 21, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporations are nonentities that not only have the same rights as human beings, they now have more rights than humans, plus they have no responsibilities besides making a profit. Even so, most of the profits are skimmed off at the top, and most investors are short changed.

Our country has become a Corpocracy which has imposed strictly commercial and materialistic values on America. These values are contrary to the teachings of all religions and wise men who have ever lived. Americans have been conditioned by the corporate mass media since childhood, and though many have achieved wealth, few have found happiness. Authenticity is a return to human values.

I used to laugh at people who didn’t let their children watch TV. I’m not laughing anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AUTHENTICITY vs INTEGRITY
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 21, 2006 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just a semantic issue and a chance to tease apart and clarify the precise meanings of some similar but distinctly different commonly used words:

. . . authenticity . . . means living in a way that "your inner self matches your outer self".

To me, that's a definition of integrity, related to the words 'integrate' (o make into a whole by bringing all parts together; unify) and 'integral' (whole numbers lacking fractions or decimals used for counting), all of which refer to the idea of combining individual components into a internally consistent unity or whole. It means that your saying function, your thinking function and your doing function match: when you say it, you mean it and do it without hidden agendas, deceptions or ulterior motives. That is what a match between the inner self, or mind (thoughts) and the outer self, or body (speech, actions) means to me: unity or wholeness of purpose with the parts working together as a unit toward that single purpose.

Authenticity is a slippery concept. Authentic has a specific meaning distinct from real (opposite is imagined), actual (opposite is possible), and genuine (is the kind of thing it appears to be and says it is). Authentic is related to author, or source. Something is authentic if it derives from the source it claims.

In existential philosophy, authenticity, as I understand this very vague notion, refers to being honest with yourself and being who you are. This is a kind of integrity. Wikipedia says, "Authenticity is the degree to which one is true to one's own personality, spirit, or character."

The person who lacks integrity is trying to fool others, whereas the person lacking authenticity has fooled himself and is no longer living a life that is best for him because he has a wrong notion of what that is.

So, in summary, consider that I dream that I bought what I thought was a solid gold Faberge egg (a famous jewel encrusted egg shaped object) from a con man with a cheap comb over who made it with knock-off jewels.

The egg was not real - it did not exist except in my dreams. But it was actual in the dream - not something that might happen but something already present). The egg was also not genuine - it was not made of solid gold or real gems. Nor was it authentic - it didn't come from Faberge. That's the precise meaning of authentic in everyday speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please!
Posted by: madmac10 on Aug 21, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on!

Every generation finds a new way to paint a pig. Then they find a way to congratulate themselves on their taste. This is no different.

Remember when, after the sixties turned deadly and so many music fans tried to get back to Pete Seeger's acoustic utopia? No? Remember how authentic James Taylor and Jim Croce were supposed to be?

Here is the bottom line: you put your money on the counter, and often pay for slavery and oppression, whether you are checking out of Wal Mart or your local retro-groove boutique. Do you want smugness with your shake?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

same old, same old
Posted by: anniedine on Aug 21, 2006 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jay, your magazine ventures have consistently blinded you to the problem of consumerism and this article is a prime example. Most of the article discusses all the ways we can be "authentic" through the products we buy and the companies we support.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but true "authenticity" and complicity in the corporatization of everything in our lives are not and never will be compatible.

Until and unless we free ourselves from the notion that we can buy our way into anything and everything we want in life, we will be chained to the providers of that illusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: same old, same old Posted by: ethanay
russalae
Posted by: fungus on Aug 21, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to wonder if we need to rely on cooperative, musually supportive locally based ways of living to reach for authenticity. Relying on corporations to provide authentic ways of living can be a dead end. Authenticity can become a
marketable commodity - this is one of the things that happened to the '60s counter culture. Let's be wary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just the tip of a vast iceberg of 'unauthenticity'
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 21, 2006 5:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How are the Amercian people deceived? Let me count the ways - no, I'd be here for hours- days- weeks.

Take a look at corporate spying:
Spooked: Espionage in Corporate America. This review (salon) has the typical corporate media ho-hum treatment of domestic spying. However, this book helps understand the 'human intelligence' aspect of spying on US citizens that has been a 'do not discuss' topic in the corporate media so far. Has the US government hired ex-corporate spies to target domestic political groups? Why wouldn't they have? They wouldn't be stopped by any legal concerns - ah, the benefits of using public funds to pay 'private contractors' - avoiding prosecution for criminal behavior is only one such benefit.

This is similar to the 60's-70's era COINTELPRO (FBI) and CHAOS (CIA) domestic spy-and-disrupt operations as well as to Nixon's crew of hotel burglars. If you think similar operations involving local police, federal agents and private contractors haven't been coordinated by the Bush Leaguers then you are living in a fantasy world. Fresno, Oakland, the pattern is the same - local agents infiltrate groups and file federal reports to 'Operation TALON'. Remember that after WWI, Hitler's job was spying on domestic German political groups; he relied heavily on such tactics to sieze power.

Like Good Germans in 1935, a common US citizen response to all this is "I don't care if they are spying on me". Oh yes, they're after "the terrorists" - the anti-war and environmental groups who have been "terrorizing" the Bush Administration. Political witchhunt would be the correct description. As the federal judge said, "Americans do not have hereditary kings, and there are no powers that do not derive from the Constitution." Bush, as he says, "Strongly Disagrees". King George, is it?

Keep in mind that there have been multiple reports of accidental discovery of undercover operatives in anti-war and other political groups (Green Party included); often they've gotten themselves elected to leadership positions. The goal is divide using whatever tactics available - using 'angry feminists' to denounce all men in the anti-war movement was a very popular 70's tactic. Old dogs and their old tricks.

A little note on Abramoff's plea bargain is in order:(reprinted from the blog likemariasaidpaz.blogspot.com):

"Abramoff Attorney Threatens to 'Name Names' At Sentencing Hearing" (Democracy Now!):
This update on the case of indicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff -- a federal judge has rejected a request to delay his sentencing because imprionsonment could derail his cooperation in several ongoing criminal investigations. Abramoff was ordered to return for sentencing on March 29th. Abbe Lowell, Abramoff's attorney warned the court he may reveal details of the government’s investigations at his client’s sentencing. Lowell said: "We will name names. We will provide the public with evidence of what is going on out there. It seems to me that is not in the interest of law enforcement."

Mike and I both wonder what exactly Abramoff's attorney was attempting to blackmail the authorities with? We can't figure this out. Maybe you can?"


My guess is that Abramoff was using his knowledge of a massive domestic 'humint' spying program run by local police in coordination with the federal government - the other half of the now-known 'sigint' program run with the active help of AT&T, Verizon and friends. Blackmailing the federal government - go, Jack, go! Hopefully we all won't end up like Ken Lay, victims of ''sudden heart disease'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...your inner self matches your outer self." You mean like "Stop lying"?
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 21, 2006 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such insight. How perceptive. So innovative. Who would have ever thought of it? Certainly worth 1,000 word article, since it offers so much to think about. Duh uh.

Would it be Pollyana to expect anyone to live up to it? No one is perfect, right? Or even truthful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rebelyell
Posted by: rebelyell on Aug 21, 2006 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jay W. from Ode is an extraordinary man -- i read his magazine each month front to back. He is an honorable man, too, and this commentary only proves that once again. Kudos to Ode and those who write for it! It's unfortunate that others (esp. in America) don't even know of this magazine! Perhaps a subscription is in order for the Administration in Washington -- if read, it MAY open an eye or two (who am i kidding?! they know nothing of the sort! -- reading, that is).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at Buddha? Look at Christ? Bah! I look at Howard Roark.
Posted by: Torgo on Aug 21, 2006 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Howard Roark: "But first, I want you think and tell me what made me give years to this work. money? fame? charity? altruism?" Keating shook his head slowly. "All right, you're beginning to understand [...] Peter, before you can do things for people, you must be the kind who gets things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the secondary consequences. The work, not the people. Your own action, not the possible object of your charity."

-----------
Howard Roark: "Look at them. The man who cheats and lies, but preserves a respectgble front. He knows himself to be dishonest, but others think he's honest and he derives his self-respect from that, second-hand. The man who takes credit for an achievement which is not his own. He knows himself to be mediocre but he’s great in the eyes of others. The frustrated wretch who professes love for the inferior and clings to those less endowed, in order to establish his own superiority by comparison. The man whose sole aim is to make money. Now i dont see anything evil in the desire to make money. but money is only a means to some end [...] it's so easy to run to others. It's so hard to stand on one's own record.
You can fake virtue for an audience. You can’t fake it in your own eyes. Your ego is your strictest judge, they run from it. They spend their lives running.
It’s easier to donate a few thousands to charity and think oneslef noble than to base self-respect on personal standards of personal achievement.
It’s simple to seek substitutes for competence - such easy substitutes: love, charm, kindness, charity. But there is no substitute for competence. That precisely is the deadliness of second handers. They have no concern for facts, ideas, work. They're concerned only with people.
They don’t ask: is this true? They ask: is this what others think is true? Not to judge but to repeat. Not to do but to give the impression of doing. Not creation but show. Not ability but friendship. Not merit, but pull. What would happen to the world without those who do, think, work, produce? Those are the egotists. You don’t think through another's brain and you don’t work through anothers hands. When you suspend your faculty of independent judgement, you suspend your consciousness. To stop consciousness is to stop life. "

Gail Wynand: "I think your second-handers understand this, try as they might not to admit it to themselves. Notice how they'll accept anything except a man who stands alone. They recognize him at once. By instinct. There's a special insidious kind of hatred for him. They forgive criminals, they admire dicatators. crime and violence are a tie. A form of mutual dependence. They need ties.
They’ve got to force their miserable little personalities on every single person they meet. The independent man kills them - because they don’t exist within him and that’s the only form of existence they know. Notice the malignant kind of resentment against any idea that propounds independence. notice the malice against an independent man. "

Howard Roark: "You've wondered why they suffer, why they seek happiness and never find it. If any man stopped and asked himself whether he's ever held a truly personal desire, he’d find the answer. He'd see that all his wishes, his efforts, his dreams, his ambitions are motivated by other men [...] he can find no joy in the struggle and no joy when he has succeeded. He can’t say about a single thing: this is what I wanted because I wanted t, not because it made my neighbours gape at me. Then he wonders why he’s unhappy. Every form of happiness is private. Our greatest moments are personal, self-motivated, not to be touched.

All above quotes from Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New dog, old tricks
Posted by: talkville on Aug 22, 2006 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just as they want: move interpretation inward to the alienated and isolated mind. It helps Pavlovians a lot and makes their job much easier. All you gotta do is buy, leave the rest to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Have To Fake It To Make It
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Aug 23, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was a nice article about faking it, distorting reality. I remember going to a concert several years ago and the music died. Everything went dead for three minutes. Meanwhile the audience went "mental," an Australian term.
Faking it is not relegated to musicians/singers. When we hear today's pop music chances are the singer doesn't have a band behind them, rather synthesized instruments. Or it's done with a computer. Kraftwerk was a oddity in the age of digitally produced music.
Faking it has permeated newsrooms. There is a term called "canned" news when it comes to a newsroom for printing, but it also serves a sinister purpose: to promote the company rather than to inform the public.
Editorials are canned if they're written by a corporation to push their agenda. Then the public is misinformed, when it has to distinguish the difference in opinion.
A fake news story worms its way into the pages. We've had our share of Janet Cookes, Jayson Blairs and Judith Millers, journalists who wrote fiction for dailies. A reporter can plant a fake news story and we might have a tendency to believe it.
Technology is often misused to give an impression of the real thing, or a facsimile of it. It is possible to do something halfheartedly to keep a job, to let the machine do the work for you. A Mr. Roboto at your service.
It's good, however, that people aren't falling for imitations. You have to know a lot about jewlery to tell if it's a diamond or moissanite by eyesight.
Fakes should be used for basketball moves, not for everything else in real life. That's the reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]