comments_image -

Bush & Ashcroft vs. O'Reilly?

Guess who's defending racism...
August 17, 2006  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Check out Jennifer's clip [right] in which Bill O'Reilly presents outright racism as common sense. Sure, racism is common sense for him and his fellow travelers. This time it's in the form of selecting Muslims (how do you tell exactly?) for searches by airport security.

But wait! Look who's on the other side of the debate: It's president Bush and former Attorney General John Ashcroft.

In a rare moment of sanity, common sense, and adherence to the principles of the Constitution they were sworn to uphold, Bush and Ashcroft sent a Department of Justice Fact Sheet on why Racial Profiling is wrong, will not be tolerated, "materially impair[s] our efforts to maintain a fair and just society," and "creates a 'lose-lose' situation."

Here are the two quotes that introduce the Fact Sheet (PDF):

"It's wrong, and we will end it in America. In so doing, we will not hinder the work of our nation's brave police officers. They protect us every day -- often at great risk. But by stopping the abuses of a few, we will add to the public confidence our police officers earn and deserve.'' --President George W. Bush, Feb. 27, 2001
"This administration… has been opposed to racial profiling and has done more to indicate its opposition than ever in history. The President said it's wrong and we'll end it in America, and I subscribe to that. Using race… as a proxy for potential criminal behavior is unconstitutional, and it undermines law enforcement by undermining the confidence that people can have in law enforcement." --Attorney General John Ashcroft, Feb. 28, 2002
Ooops, I lied.

Under "Taking Steps to Balance National Security Concerns," there's this provision (emphasis mine):

"the racial profiling guidance recognizes that race and ethnicity may be used in terrorist identification, but only to the extent permitted by the nation’s laws and the Constitution."

That would be the Constitution Bush, Cheney, Gonzales and others are busy trying to work around (see: Spying, NSA). Which effectively means that yes, when it comes to airport screeners the Bush administration is in full accordance with O'Reilly's talking points.

Let the wrong, will not be tolerated, "materially impair[s] our efforts to maintain a fair and just society," and "creates a 'lose-lose' situation commence. Just make sure it's international please.

For those interested in why racial profiling doesn't work and is merely a hollow plan to capitalize on fear and racism, go HERE.

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reach US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
Thousands Protest Anti-Gay Pastor In North Carolina

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
Bad Company for Mitt: Trump, Newt, and Now Meg Whitman

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
Battle of the Dems: Blue Dog Spends $1.25 Mil of Own Dough Trying to Defeat Progressive in CA Congressional Primary

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Electoral Map Big Picture: If We Win This One, the GOP Fever Might Break

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
Pilot Kicks Sexist Passenger Off Her Plane

By Melissa Van Gelder | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Koch Footing Bill for "Grassroots": Anti-Gov't Folks Have Billionaires Paying for Every Need

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]