Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Top 10 Corporate Democrats-For-Hire

By Russ Baker, AlterNet. Posted August 24, 2006.


They claim to be 'centrists,' but these D.C. Dems -- whose corporate agendas aren't too different from Bush administration policies -- are living proof that the system needs fixing.
082406story1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Russ Baker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The media like a simple story line -- and Joe Lieberman's defeat in the Connecticut Senate primary fits the bill: Pro-war senator goes down. Anti-war progressives ascendant, Republicans gleeful, and so forth. But Lieberman is more than an ally in the Bush administration's dissembling on Iraq. He is yet another example of someone who came to Washington as a purported idealist and turned into a creature of the capital's big-money culture. Lieberman's loss is a loss for Cheney and Rumsfeld to be sure, but it's also a loss for an army of sleazy political operatives and consultants.

While Lieberman is best known outside of Washington for his neocon views, he's famous in the capital for his undying support for corporate causes. There are countless examples: Remember Lieberman's role in blocking the reforms of stock option accounting that former SEC chair Arthur Levitt was trying to enact? This was a question of honest accounting that became part and parcel of the corporate corruption scandals of recent years, and Lieberman was a champion of the wrong side.

Beyond that, Lieberman happily has done the bidding of the pharmaceutical companies, the insurance companies and many others, thus establishing an unsavory underside to his more admirable record on environmental and other issues. And of course, his support of and continued rationalization of the Iraq invasion, like many of Lieberman's other stances, has served chiefly to benefit large corporations, in this case the "national security/homeland defense" industry that got a huge boost from Bush's reckless military adventurism. It's no great surprise to learn that Karl Rove called Lieberman the other day after his loss, and described him as a "friend."

Lieberman and his defenders have tried to portray his brand of politics as "centrism." But it has little to do with mainstream voters and much to do with the money culture of Washington of which many Democrats have become a part. And yet, Ralph Nader is wrong in his blanket condemnations of Democrats: You still are more likely to find someone willing to stand up to the big money boys among Democrats than Republicans. But the gap is narrowing. Voters sense it.

How big a problem is the growing influence of the bipartisan Beltway Party? Details on this can be found in a report from the Real News Project, a new nonprofit noncommercial investigative reporting outfit I founded. RealNews examined the track records of prominent Washington Democrats, consultants, advertising and public relations executives, lobbyists, attorneys and the like who have close connections to the top circles of their party. Many of them served in the Clinton-Gore White House, and many of them will likely be tapped should a Democrat be elected in 2008 and have considerable influence in a future Democratic-controlled Congress.

We scrutinized scores of Washington Dems and found many ensconced in firms working to advance corporate agendas that don't look that different from policy we see emanating from the Bush administration. To be sure, many of these people have redeeming qualities, represent some admirable causes as well, and may personally harbor inclinations for the greater good. Yet, in trying to earn a handsome living in Washington, they apparently do what a person's gotta do. Can political success and influence be attained without working for The Man? Let's defer that debate for another time and start with a few facts.

First, let's check in with Mike McCurry, President Clinton's former press secretary. He's a partner at the firm Public Strategies Washington, Inc., and serves as chairman of Hands Off the Internet -- an outfit created by telecom companies such as AT&T and BellSouth which, paradoxically, want to put their hands ON the internet by creating what amounts to internal tariffs on internet traffic for large downloads and such. The hands that are supposed to stay off are those of regulators or legislators who want to keep the internet free.

Want Clinton? Over at a "strategic communications" company founded in 2001, you've got enough Friends of Bubba to fill a VW bug. There's McCurry's successor as Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart, and Al Gore's top strategists Carter Eskew and Michael Feldman. There's Howard Wolfson, former spokesman for Hillary Clinton and executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. And Joel Johnson, senior adviser for policy and communications to President Clinton.

When an election pops up, nearly the entire top brass rush to work on it. Lockhart and Wolfson, for example, took leaves in 2004 to work on the Kerry campaign and at the DNC. Johnson went from another firm to the Kerry campaign, then joined Glover Park.This mixture of politics and business seems to be working, because in 2005, the firm was ranked the fastest-growing private company in the District of Columbia.

What business, you ask? Even before Glover Park, Eskew, who has done media work for Sens. Chris Dodd, Joe Lieberman, and Tom Harkin, and is close to Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, was criticized for his work providing media advice to the tobacco industry. This time around, Eskew has been working again for Lieberman.


Digg!

Russ Baker is a freelance journalist and essayist. He is the founder of the Real News Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
jam-packed
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 24, 2006 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for confirming that corporations and politics are jam-packed with greedy criminals. What we need are healthy laws that separate corporations from politicians with firm prosecution of those of either camp who collaberate with the other camp or otherwise degrade democracy. We also need to eliminate any stupid laws that equate corporations with personhood and any member of the Supremes who pushes corporate personhood rights. The USA is so far from being a democracy that its current top leaders push mass murder worldwide in illegitiment wars. We need to move from being led by crooks to being led by decent people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jam-packed Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Let's just admit..... Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: Let's just admit..... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Let's just admit..... Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: Christie - You are right. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: jam-packed Posted by: gltirebiter
» Name calling? Wow, thats rich Posted by: psychochurch
» RE: Name calling? Wow, thats rich Posted by: Lincoln fan
So, AlterNot, tell us again how the Dems are the solution
Posted by: CounterCorp on Aug 24, 2006 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Russ Baker's excellent investigative article (hint, hint) points out how all of the cheerleaders for the Democrats to retake Congress are just voting for their tribe to gain power over the other tribe; the problems -- and solutions to them -- are nowhere to be found in the Democratic Party, as they are as much the cause of the thoroughly bankrupt system in which the Bushmen currently run riot as anyone.

What's shameful is the degree to which so-called "alternative" media such as AlterNot can continue to masquerade as an alternative to mainstream journalists (and politics) when their clear editorial bias -- from Don Hazen right through the majority of columnists and the editors who chose articles by other writers -- is to favor of the Democrats as a remedy for the problems invariably blamed on Republicans (who deserve no defense, and will get none here) rather than a thoroughly corrupt system that so obviously encompasses both major parties.

A truly alternative news source would apply equal attention, analysis, and criticism to the endemic corruption, craven venality, and hollow rhetoric of both parties; focus on issues and policies rather than cheerleading for the hypocritical sloganeering and Clintonesque "politics of gesture" that passes for a Democratic platform; and provide examples and perspectives beyond -- and, indeed, in direct repudiation to -- the two major parties.

To hold oneself up as an "alternative" and then relentlessly slag off the Republicans while boosting the Democrats is little more than a sick, pathetic joke. The Democrats as alternative? Please. They're so deep in the political cesspool they'd need goggles and swim fins to reach the surface, and they ain't exactly kicking their legs trying to find it ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» noxious Republican troll Posted by: BKLN
» RE: noxious Republican troll Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Third party Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: BKLN Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Lincoln on acid Posted by: BKLN
» RE: Lincoln on acid Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: noxious Republican troll Posted by: CounterCorp
I never understood the Left thought of Slick Willy as a Liberal
Posted by: marklar on Aug 24, 2006 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Clinton was the smartest modern President we've had. He was possibly even smarter than JFK. But when it cae to big business and making money for the establishment Clinton was as good a crooked carnival barker, and certainly more devious, than George w. Bush. Bush just gives treasure away, I know, but Clinton was definately slick and sneaky when it came to putting money into the pockets of the rich.
Tell me waht Clintons legacy really is. What did he do for the poor, the working class, the middle class? He was nothing more than a steward for the status quo, the G H W Bush elite, the corporate interests and so on. Yeah, blacks loved him becasue he's a soulful guy who grew up poor and was sincere, but what did he really do for African Americans and their positions related to education and overty and equality?
He felt our pain, so what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Three cheers for Russ Baker!
Posted by: katinmn on Aug 24, 2006 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great reporting.

The DC crowd is a truly inbred bunch. Yuck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can't vote the rascals out!
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 24, 2006 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both parties are funded by the same industries. Anyone who will take the trouble to click on Open Secrets will find the whole story of who gives and who gets. For instance in the election cycle before the infamous Seniors Prescription Drug Plan the pharmaceutical industry had contributed $20 million to the Republicans and $10 million to the Democrats. This same pattern holds for the defense, banking, insurance, and many other industries. Both parties are bought and paid for by the corporate establishment. Both parties are controlled by the corporatocracy. We can vote the Republicans out and we can vote the Democrats out but we can't vote the establishment out. Our votes only decide which party carries out the corporate agenda.
Bob Reichenbach
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We can't vote the rascals out! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: We can't vote the rascals out! Posted by: monkeywrench
Not a dime's worth of difference
Posted by: Democritus on Aug 24, 2006 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Baker's article shows that corporations are running the country. The major and minor actors shuffle to and fro on stage, but the plot-line remains the same. Is there really any difference between Joe Lieberman and John McCain? Between Nancy Pelosi and Dennis Hastert? Between Hillary Clinton and Lindsay Graham? Every couple of years we get to vote for either Tweedledum or Tweedledee. And then it's business as usual, with another Republocrat in office. Is it any wonder that most people don't bother to vote? I'm with Shakespeare's Mercutio: "A pox on both your houses."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a great start for a list of
Posted by: greentime on Aug 24, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
those never to do business with, vote for and to watch out for!

Let's call out the greedy, the liars, the cons, and the thieves!

Let's name them, and put this information out everywhere they go. If there is ever a need for an offenders list to be published, it is now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Green Party is the Non-Corporate Choice
Posted by: Douglas on Aug 24, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Green Party does not accept money from corporations and does not represent the corporate agenda. With the support of progressives it can develop into a major party and can help make a progressive difference. To learn about Green Party candidates in your state this year go to http://www.greencommons.org/ or http://www.gp.org/.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

his vote could not be bought “but it can be rented.”
Posted by: CajunCountry on Aug 24, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the report:

"JOHN BREAUX

Lobbyist with the law firm of Patton Boggs, number one firm in terms of lobbying revenue in 2005. Former Democratic Senator from Louisiana famed for his consistent advocacy of his state’s big businesses and for supporting the Bush tax cuts; said his vote could not be bought “but it can be rented.” Longtime member of Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over three of the most lobbied topics in town: taxes, trade and health care. After leaving the senate, he was appointed by President Bush as vice chairman of a panel on overhauling the tax code while working at Patton Boggs (though not officially as a ‘lobbyist’ at first) with clients that included two New York investment firms. "

You let this guy off waaaaay too easy. He was a 'Reagan Democrat' and became the Republicans go-to guy for extorting Democratic representatives (first as a Congressman - then in the Senate) to vote for all manner of terrible administration bills - Ronnie and aWol's tax cuts, the dreadful Medicare part D fiasco - and so on.

I still have the letter from his House office in responce to my protesting his unqualified refusal to hold anyone responsible for Iran-Contra, for which I still maintain Reagan should have been impeached, and his repeated declarations of support for Reagan and his band of crooks.

Ugh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PS Posted by: CajunCountry
It All Started...
Posted by: NoPCZone on Aug 24, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Supreme Court gave corporations the legal standing as persons before the law. It's been a steady downhill slide since then, bringing us to this sorry point. Without comprehensive legal reform this sh*t isn't going to stop regardless of who is in power.

Object lesson #1-
(Setting)1992 Election Campaign for President
President GHW Bush has negotiated the NAFTA agreement and is roundly criticized by both H Ross Perot (Ind/Reform Party) and Bill Clinton (Democrat) over the pending treaty.

Bush is for it-- his lieutenants negotiated it.
Perot claims that if passed we will all hear a great 'sucking sound' of jobs going south to Mexico and that it is bad for our country.
Clinton says the concept is good but it needs to have tough environmental and worker rights language put in before it is approved.

Clinton wins the presidency in a 3-way split of the vote with only 43% of the popular vote. The sitting president is sent packing, the would-be reformer goes home to Texas and the very-inside 'outsider' goes to the White House.

Results

NAFTA passes the Senate largely unchanged and the great sucking sound commences until it is later surpassed by the sucking sound from China. Clinton sent the same basic treaty to the Senate that he criticized Bush for.

HR Perot sets up the Alliance Airport and other business ventures to profit from the newly available opportunities afforded by the new NAFTA treaty. If NAFTA was so bad for America why would super patriot Perot exploit it for profit? Uh-Huh.

Now tell me, what real choice did you have regarding NAFTA? All three were committed to it. The only difference is that 2 misrepresented their support for the issue for political gain.

Money is trump in Washington, D.C.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It All Started... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: It All Started... Posted by: sea4to
And You Had To Be A Republican To Work K Street?
Posted by: pelle_in_goal on Aug 24, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember a while back when the MSM rumor mill was circulating that GOP leaders like Tom DeLay and Bill Frist were "insisting" that lobbying firms hire only Repugnicans? What a joke. As if the Dems on K Street don't promote the same pro-business and anti-progressive influence the GOP and neo-con lobbies buy and sell everyday.

Perhaps the worst thing about "moderate" Democratic lobbyists has always been that a lot of their influence peddling really has been anti-environment, anti-union, pro-NAFTA and pro-GATT, and pro-deregulation. That makes the Democratic Party even more hypocritical than their opposition. These days, what little consumer and labor activism the Dems propose with their left hand -- they are literally quite happy to take away with their right.

Witness the Pebble Beach/Spanish Bay Retreat Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. hosted last month. The guest list paid little attention to party affiliations past and present. Certainly neither of the Clintons have an immortal soul to worry about anymore. And for Dems like Al Gore and "New" Labour like Tony Blair, each seems quite eager for the opportunity to be tarred with the same brush as Newt Gingrich, the Governator, and Shimon Peres. Just as long as it's all going on behind closed doors.

Murdoch has become kingmaker of the Western world. Still, he's just one more lobbyist -- even if he's a very, very powerful one. Obviously, he requires control of both sides of K Street just as much as he needs control of both sides of the aisles in Congress. What makes all of this so bad is that the real business of government is now done in secret -- by people who pursued politics as a career -- because they knew how lucrative the revolving door of Washington politics really is.

Which gives the nation's capital all the flavour of Beijing's Forbidden City -- with all the palace intrigue of plotting factions of (political) eunuchs that went with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profits Über Alles!
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Aug 24, 2006 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I have always said, Democrats and Republicans are opposite ends of the same corporate turd.

History teaches us that in the 1930s, German Big Business supported a madman named Adolf Hitler, who started a war that caused the deaths of millions and almost destroyed Germany.

In 2000, American Big Busniess supported a madman named George W. Bush, who started a war...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dr Dan
Posted by: drdanj on Aug 24, 2006 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great reporting, but how odd that this story runs next to an ad of a smiling Al Gore asking us to draft him for president. I greatly respect his movie on global warming, but wonder if perhaps it is a marketing ploy for him (con liberals and suck up their votes). Given the history of "liberal" discrepancy between campaign rhetoric and actual policy, is this just a ploy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dr Dan Posted by: Lincoln fan
Why we need a progressive candidates
Posted by: Linda50 on Aug 24, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I know why the DNC won't support our democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate. She is not a corporate flunky. Even the Democracy For America is unwilling to endorse her. Now, we need to come together more then ever, but the national dems are busy covering their corporate butts. Now, what do we do? The green party don't fit the bill, the environment is important but that is just a one issue party. We need a party that encompasses the issues facing the everyday person, like a living wage, affordable health care, affordable energy alternatives. We need a civil war!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One issue party!?! Posted by: robertjneal
» Please Help Us To "Get It" Posted by: Douglas
» RE: One issue party!?! Posted by: Linda50
» RE: One issue party!?! Posted by: sea4to
» RE: One issue party!?! Posted by: Linda50
gramps
Posted by: gramps on Aug 24, 2006 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Corporations


It must seem strange to call this ubiquitous business form a mistake but the Supreme Court decision of 1867 Santa Clara V The Southern Pacific Railroad by giving it personhood with all of the rights of a human person guaranteed by the IV Amendment set in motion a juggernaut that controls our lives. This is the same Supreme Court that decided that the escaped slave Dred Scott was not a human being but property that was owned and should be returned to his master. Like Esau who sold his birthright for a mess of pottage, we have sold our souls to the corporation and have become commodities as surely as those that we buy at Wal Mart. Let us carefully examine the legal person who has become our master. Joel Bakan has written a book called The Corporation and produced a movie with the same title. He puts the corporation on the couch like a good psychoanalyst and decides that the corporation is a sociopath. It was born entirely without a conscience and has only one motive—the bottom line. All decision makers employed by the corporation must make their decisions by what is called “cost benefit analysis”., That means that if the medicine we sell causes heart attacks or our product the automobile catches fire and burns someone to death we have only two decisions. Do we recall the dangerous product or do we settle with the liability lawsuits? No human owner of a business would dare to consider either of these decisions., His punishment could be jail or death row for mass murder. But you can't throw a corporation in jail. You might convict the CEO, who is an employee of the corporation, but that is a risk that he takes in exchange for his enormous salary and his golden parachute. You might put the Chief Executive Officer on the couch but an examination would show that he is only a sociopath while on the job and that at home he is a loving father.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gramps Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: gramps Posted by: AndreaN
Lieberman = Neocon Victory!
Posted by: HHS on Aug 24, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please let us not feel the Neocons are hurting because Lieberman lost the primary in Connecticut. In view of how they may lose several seats in the upcoming Senate elections, this Lieberman situation could actually be a swing of 2 for them as they are getting behind Lieberman. A Lieberman win will not only be a Democratic seat lost, but retain a rightwing vote in the Senate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Will Be Fooled Again
Posted by: edith on Aug 24, 2006 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a useful "wanted" list, but the seamy Tony Coehlo could be added.

just ask yourself why all the big "K" St. firms are hiring Democrats right now! They are just preparing for a change in party control. Meet the new Boss. Same as the Old Boss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What WE need is a HOUSE CLEANING!
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Aug 24, 2006 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody is so caught up in this left/right, liberal/con thing that the REAL issue has been totally ignored. There are TWO oil men occupying the White House. Gas is at 3 bucks a gallon in most of America. We've lost 3 million manufacturing jobs in six years and now the Head of the Fed is saying we need to lose 2 million more to combat inflation. This nation is going down like the Titanic and all anybody can do is fight about left and right.
Anybody got any health care out there in America that isn't costing you and arm and a leg JUST FOR AN OFFICE CALL? Anybody seen the minumim wage go up? Anybody tried to get a DECENT paying job lately? What have your utility bills been like lately? Congress just VOTES itself a raise. Can you do that?
Your old people are suffering. Your young people are flipping burgers for a living. You're dying because of no health care and nobody in Washington, D.C. gives a shit. You got NO
jobs, NO future and NO hope. Hell, folks, you don't HAVE to worry about a bunch of Islamic terrorists taking you out! Your own government is doing a more than adequate job of that! You don't have to worry about a MORAL choice when you vote! Apparently, in America, it's every man, woman and child for theirselves and damn the hindmost. Jesus is coming back to sort it all out for you! And this is what is called a SUPERPOWER?
Excuse me, but somewhere along the line not only did your government get hijacked but your minds got hijacked as well. Just keep on bitching about left or right, liberal or con.
That's what they want you to do...keep at each others throats and keep off theirs while they rape YOUR nation blind, put the procedes in European bank accounts and leave you to deal with the aftermath. In the words of a Brit from WW2 'Either we hang together or we hang alone.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tHE INTOXICATING SCENT OF FRESHLY MINTED CASH
Posted by: FedererFan on Aug 24, 2006 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That scent will get 'em every time. Send an idealogue to DC and I'll show you a future millionaire with illusions of granduer. It is not the day of "Mr Smith goes to Washington". We live in the "Fox can call itself a news service with a straight face and get away with it" generation. What would I do. Show me the money....it is going to happen. Lets just admit it and get on with it, you can't fix a problem until you recognize that you have one and identify what it is. DUH. I just hope they are throwing some of that cash to candidates that will at least subpoena the current crop and hopefully impeach as many as possible, from the "not qualified" judicial appointees to the guy the stole the presidency twice and his left hand man, big DICK cheney.....good riddance.

Charles
NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Troy Maples
Posted by: Troymaples on Aug 24, 2006 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate this article sooo much. I hardly know what to say except....WE NEED A THIRD PARTY !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.... And No Impeachment
Posted by: xi_people on Aug 24, 2006 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I read another blog posting that says, "once the democrats take back the House, they'll impeach Bush," I'm going to throw up. When will the general populace wake up to the fact that no matter what Bushco does, impeachment will NEVER happen?

As this article partially details, virtually all of the putative "leaders" of the democrat party are DINOs (republicans). They are fully complicit in the ongong crimes against humanity that this mis-administration has undertaken, and impeachment is a can of worms they will NEVER open.

Let's face facts: corporate money has completely infested the system, which is now corrupt beyond repair. The "pretend" pure America that mistaken idealists like to hark back to will never return. The iron grip of the corporations will never lessen, but will only increase in strength. I have no idea what the future holds, specifically, but common sense dictates that not much of it will be good.

The democrats are no saviors and no third party will ride in on a white horse to save the situation. Some very intelligent people I know refuse to even acknowledge these basic truths, but soon the awful confirmation will be too overwhelming for anyone with half a brain to deny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: .... And No Impeachment Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: .... And No Impeachment Posted by: xi_people
» RE: .... And No Impeachment Posted by: Lincoln fan
It's only 2 months to election time-hold the bs
Posted by: leemiller38 on Aug 24, 2006 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So you want the green party to take over? Dems are as bad as Repugs? Corporations are evil psychopaths -yadda yadda.

Get real folks, the election cycle is here and you aren't going to change the world in two months and the problems are often beyond solution. Humans have about had it anyway--so vote out these Repug bastards who support Bush and at least it will rein in some of the erosion of rights, the war, the gross corruption and incompetence of this bunch. That is about all you can hope for and should settle for given the incumbent advantages in our grossly unfair election process. Hopefully we can weed out some of Dem pukes over time, but don't hold your breath. Humans are greedy and their own worse enemy regardless of the political party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is a bit soft on the Republican membership of the Corporate Party
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 24, 2006 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always like to look up the authors of news pieces to see what they've previously written, who they've worked for, etc - especially after observing the Judith Millers and Bob Novaks in action. Let's address one issue first:

This article has a serious failing - No side-by-side comparison of Democratic and Republicans - who are the top 10 Corporate-For-Hire Republicans? (The top 100 might be more like it). By my estimate (not that I've done a lot of research) the ratio of Democrats to Republicans in the Corporate Party of America is about 1:15? 1:10? 1:5? Somewhere in that range is where the answer to that question lies. These are people whose central, primary allegiance is to the billionaires who covertly fund their campaigns and from who they take their orders; for example, Tom Delay was clearly ExxonMobil's House boy.

So, why not do a breakdown of the corporate empire and ask who owns who? Telecommunications, Pharmaceuticals, Coal, Natural Gas, Oil, Military Armaments, Microelectronics, Engineering, Petrochemicals, Agribusiness - and so on - who are their pet Senators and House Members? You could make another list of Democrats and Republicans who have been vocal proponents of Clean Money in Politics rules - public financing of elections - otherwise known as preventing CEO's and billionaire shareholders from controlling the poitical process in this country. That's a much shorter list, I'm afraid.

Now let's look at Russ Baker's previous work on Alternet:
http://www.alternet.org/authors/5164

So, his most recent column was on the Republican cronies (Getting Past the Watergate Fixation:
The ongoing GOP corruption scandals are just the tip of the iceberg. The real problem is how business is done every day in Washington. Posted on May 11, 2006), and now he's written one about the Democrats - that's pretty fair - he's taking on both sides of the aisle (and the Greens have turned into a Republican-funded sideshow - not that Nader will even address the issue).

On the other hand, I'd strongly disagree with his piece on the 2004 election; it does seem there were serious problems with the recounts and the electronic voting machines, and I clearly recall the earlier returns coming in for Kerry and the last-minute reversal - it sure seems like Ohio was stolen.
(Election 2004: Stolen or Lost
By Russ Baker, TomPaine.com. Posted January 10, 2005.
As time passes and allegations of fraud are investigated, it seems clearer that the story of the 2004 election is more about incompetence and dysfunction than intentional misconduct.)

The main point of this little exercise (sorry Russ, but I needed an example to work with) is that one should always do a little research on media people - Russ Baker's pieces on media malfeasance seem very top-notch to me, and you'd never see the mainstream media criticizing themselves. If you were to collect all of Judith Miller's articles, you'd see exactly what she is all about - government propaganda mouthpiece that she was.

You can no longer trust any media outlets in this country, is my point - always do the extra research if you want to be well-informed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Open Secrets is a great site, but... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
green party=no solution
Posted by: larry278 on Aug 24, 2006 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the green party is a solution to corporations & special interests buying influence-why doesn't the green party's candidate for PA's seat in the U S Senate return every cent Senator Santorum's fat cat & corporate supporters donated to the green party's U S Senate campaign in PA?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Git outta Dodge, pardner!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 24, 2006 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lieberman's not done, folks. Working as he is for the Bushies, he'll run as an independent in November for two reasons: his ego, and to split the vote, increasing the chances that the Republican candidate will win. Thanks, Joe, for all that you've done –– now, will you go join the other party, the one you really belong with?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welfare "Reform"?
Posted by: Dianka on Aug 24, 2006 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can someone name a single Democrat in office who advocates on behalf of the fastest growing segment of the US population---the poor? Every penny stolen from social insurance/social safety net programs (i.e., that dread word "welfare") has gone toward paying a portion of the massive tax cuts (welfare) for the very rich. Today, the poor are treated punitively, blamed for the range of social and economic factors that have increased poverty in the US.
We're so afraid to say that, like other industrialized nations, we require a welfare system. I don't know if the geeral public is just that ignorant about US poverty, especially since welfare repeal, or just don't care ("better them than me...").
Do you know that we now have the highest infant mortality rate among all industrialized nations? Did you know that the average life expectancy for America's poor is now around 50 years of age?
Most of these people --- those who can --- ARE working.
Some cannot work. For others, work is scarce, seasonal, always without any degree of security.
Did we learn anything from Katrina? You can't pull yourself up by the bootstraps if you are too poor to have boots. Katrina showed us the reality of America's treatment of the poor, not only in New Orleans, but coast to coast.
And yes, the poor do die in the streets and in abandoned buildings (usually in winter), but such deaths are no longer news. They are increasingly routine. And yes, the US does violate/disregard internationally-recognized fundamental human rights in its treatment of the poor. Where is American outrage concerning this?
Why does even the Progressive community appear ashamed to even mention the poor in America? Sure, ideally, all the poor would become employed. And it would always be sunny if it just stopped being cloudy. In reaity, the causes of poverty are complex, and vary widely, and as long as we ignore human needs, poverty in the US will continue to worsen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How could Lieberman take votes away from a Democrat?
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Aug 24, 2006 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've heard this said a lot and I just don't get it.

I would expect anyone who would vote for Lieberman in a three-way race between Democrat, Republican, and Lieberman, to vote for the Republican in a two-way race.

Or am I greatly overestimating the voters' intelligence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE NEED A NEW PARTY
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Aug 24, 2006 9:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why go to the polls and vote for Dems or Repugs when too many of them should be indicted for anti-American activities?
We need a new Party that really represents the American people. We need honest representatives who swear to work for the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE NEED A NEW PARTY Posted by: Lincoln fan
One party
Posted by: talkville on Aug 24, 2006 10:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, indications that we in the USA have only one party with 2 right wings, as someone said a while ago.... Walk careful! there's a big ole elephant in the room!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 -