Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

'Miami Vice': The Class Analysis

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted August 11, 2006.


The film's bleak vision of a world divided between shanty-towns and trailer parks at one end, and unimaginable luxury at the other, is not far off the mark.
miamivicejpg
'Miami Vice': The Class Analysis

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Barbara Ehrenreich

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Everyone knows that the new big-screen "Miami Vice" is "darker" than the old one, meaning that the light-hearted, wise-cracking Don Johnson and Philip Michael Thomas have been replaced by the brooding, inarticulate Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx, who favor dingy blues and grays over their predecessors' lavender and turquoise outfits. But the real darkness of the movie has gone unnoted by the critics: In his latest "Vice," Michael Mann offers up an economically globalized world populated only by the grimly poor and the breathtakingly ultra-rich, all of whom are bigtime felons.

Here, the poor serve largely as scenery, reminding us that we are now in Port-au-Prince (black faces), Ciudad del Este (brown), or a trailer park in the industrial wastelands of Miami (white and often tattooed). A few of them seem to be employed as lookouts or, a little higher up the career ladder, "shooters," for the drug gangs. Otherwise, they might as well be signposts.

As for a middle or working class: In crime fiction, this is the historical role of the cops or private eyes. In "Miami Vice," though, the good guys have not a shred of material existence to betray their social class. Crockett and Tubbs don't live anywhere, and touch down only in unfurnished apartments provided by their employer, where they use the showers for sex. They never sleep or eat, so we cannot know whether they prefer, for example, burgers to blackened sea bass. Only bad guys eat and then not much. The one who did appear to be chewing may have been just gnawing on his meth mouth.

In general, it's a starkly stripped-down world our heroes now inhabit. What is all the shooting about? Drugs, of course, but these are rarely mentioned by name, nor do the good guys ever hint at any moral impulse for the war. Are the drugs destructive? Could they possibly be more destructive than the shootouts, bombings, and torturings occasioned by their illegal status? No one seems to care. Drugs are just the "product," and the only issue is their delivery -- successful or intercepted in a hail of automatic weapon fire.

In Mann's hyper-abstract version of global capitalism, the "product" could be anything, so long as its price is high enough. To make sure we get the point, the coldhearted drug queen played by Gong Li suits up in high-corporate minimalism and refers to herself as a "businesswoman."

It's the ultra-rich -- Gong Li and her colleagues -- who hold our eyes in "Miami Vice." They live too large for movies; they need IMAX. I gasped when the camera swept over Brazil's Iguassu Falls, which are surely the very suburbs of heaven, and settled on the evil ones' mountaintop mansion, where the drug lord and his lady were cuddling and scheming, attended by a small army of servants. They may not have much fun -- Gong Li's thoughts are elsewhere -- but whatever they have, they have it fast. Want to dash over to Geneva to make a deposit? The personal jet awaits.

There's an instructive scene when things begin to heat up between Colin Farrell and Gong Li. (They're on opposite sides of the drug war, but in the same zone of hotness.) He offers her a drink. She favors mojitos and tells him the best ones are in Havana. They're in Miami when this exchange takes place, but -- no problem -- a high-speed power boat whisks them off to the mojito source. If she'd asked for a Stoli on million-year-old ice, no doubt they would have hightailed right down to Antarctica.

All right, it's just a silly summer movie, lacking either comprehensible dialogue or plot. But Mann's bleak vision of a world divided between shanty-towns and trailer parks at one end, and unimaginable luxury at the other, is not far off the mark. Take the crucial matter of travel: While the poor creep around in buses and the affluent creep a little faster in taxis, there's a class of people who take helicopters to the airport, where they then embark on private planes. According the Aug. 6 New York Times, private aviation has gone "mainstream," with even the "merely rich," who can't afford their own planes, buying up 25 hours of air travel for $299,000.

No pretzels on their menu. As the Times reports, one private fleet met a passenger's requirement for "Grey Goose vodka frozen two hours before flight, ice cubes made with Fiji water, filet mignon of precise cut and dimension, and Froot Loops ... for the kids."

Meanwhile, according to globalissues.com, nearly half the world's people -- 3 billion -- live on less than $2 a day. Their lives are too cramped and squalid to make for good summer viewing. But they do serve a function as local color -- and by catching the occasional bullet or bomb.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream." This piece originally appeared on Barbara's blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is true: the world is getting very grim
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 11, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who reads this article should also read Mike Davis's 'City of Slums'. It chronicles the inexorable division of all our cities between teeming slums on the periphery, and gleaming centres of condos and office towers.

I travel to all this places with my work. I see it over and over again: the lack of any control or regulation, often encouraged by people who support open borders, leading to the growth of slums.

What is needed to solve this problem is a legtimising of land ownership for the poor, and a massive increase in education and awareness of how to build proper housing. We need pre-fab houses that are cheap, comfortable, aesthetically designed. We need to stop the shabby alternatives of trailer parks and makeshift housing built from cardboard, refuse and tin.

The big problem right now is that the people with the taste and the ideas, will never go anywhere near these areas out of fear.

What we need is something like Ikea, but instead of just vending furniture, it should be vending high quality housing solutions. You should be able to go into the giant warehouse and pick flat packed pre-fab homes: a nice one made from wood, another one from plastic, etc. ranging in prices.

What I have seen is make-shift variations of this concept in slums, started by local entrepreneurs. But these tin shacks for a few hundred bucks are poor quality and lack a permanence. This problem can be solved using market forces. The next big battle is to legitimise these people and the wealth they have (no matter how small). Once this is done, then you can beging the process of growing their wealth and building a more stable and prosperous community.

The alternative will be what we saw in Zimbabwe: the operation 'take out the trash', where the government bulldozed neighbourhoods out of frustration with the crime and grime.

We need an Ikea and Walmart of housing and community building: where are all those progressive entrepreneurs out there? Stop just giving your money to charities who think small!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sad but true Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Sad but true Posted by: Leman
» RE: Live like Ayn Rand??? Posted by: psychochurch
» RE: Live like Ayn Rand??? Posted by: Leman
» RE: Live like Ayn Rand??? Posted by: harris
» RE: Live like Ayn Rand??? Posted by: Leman
neocolonial metropoles
Posted by: wli on Aug 11, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's missing from the world of slums and mansions is that mansions need "islands of stability" to exist. Park them directly in the midst of slums and they're well within the grasp of peasant rebellions.

Such islands of stability formed colonial metropoles in the past, and do so today. The question, as it were, is where they are. I maintain that they're not within the US, which is in effect being recolonized.

Witness, for instance, the striking parallels between World Bank and IMF austerity measures and the right-wing/GOP economic agenda. The neocolonial instrument of economic warfare is being deployed against the US; that's no metropole. Applying Chomsky's principle of "socialism for the rich, the discipline of the free market for the poor," the new metropole may very well be the EU or some portion thereof. Another possibility is offshore tax havens such as the Cayman Islands, Niue, Vanuatu, et al, using geographic isolation (and "tax freedom") in the place of financial methods to pacify the surrounding people who are far fewer in number than on continents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: neocolonial metropoles Posted by: Sojourner
illustrates
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 11, 2006 4:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The movie illustrates that the direction the Bushies are moving us toward is ghastly hell not the utopia Bushie propaganda would have us believe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to operate an echo chamber
Posted by: Leman on Aug 11, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As always, a very fine piece of social critique by Ms. Ehrenreich. I always enjoy reading her articles and essays, although I completely disagree with most of her points. Being a product of the era of synth pop, ridiculous outfits and overdone make-up, I am conditioned to pay more attention to style than to substance. Just kidding...

It is true it's just a summer flick. And it is also true it's a reflection of how we (or some other people, at least) perceive life's issues. Oversimplifications in art often reflect oversimplifications in our every day perceptions - the juxtapositions and contrasts that help us break up the gray world into manageable bits of black and white. Dirt poor – filthy rich. Smart and cold-minded – drugged around the clock. Crawling through a trailer park – dashing out on a private jet. There are also plenty of circular definitions we employ. Good guys – those who fight bad guys. Poor – those who can't make enough money.

Of course, it wouldn't be an article by Ms. Ehrenreich if it did not itself include oversimplified contrasts and associations. Like putting together a concept of being "rich" and a menu of the private jet flight. Or living on below $2 a day and not having a face (except as a receptacle of an occasional bullet or a source of "local color"). It was such a good movie critique – why did she have to end it with socialist propaganda?! You know that not all "rich" people fly private jets. Not all of them even live in any kind of luxury. And the dollar figure is completely inappropriate too: I used to live on $10 a month and it was not too bad. Not much fun but not exactly Haitian zinc-town life either. Times change, I admit. My mom back at home has to have about $150 a month for the same (very modest) life style. Nevertheless, my sister is quite comfortable on $600 a month. And, in case you wonder, I am not from Central Africa. Anybody who ever met a self-made millionaire knows how much work and determination it takes to get there. Anybody who talked to a person on his way to his private jet knows that it's actually cheaper to travel this way (yes, it is, if you factor in what that person's time costs). Anybody who ever heard of exchange rates would not spout a "less than $2 a day" statistic.

Does Ms. Ehrenreich know all this? I am sure she does. But leaving these well-positioned pieces of demagogy out of what seems to be an essay on pop culture would not make for much of a conversation afterwards, would it? There would not be a flood of "here is what we should do" opinions. There would not be occasional off-the-wall messages blaming all this inequity on the current Administration. There would not be any trolls writing something idiotic and pseudo-Republican to attract a ton of "progressive" flame. None of it would happen. It would be just another movie review. I wonder how many comments on this article will be based solely on its last 3 paragraphs. Alternet was designed as a "progressive echo chamber". Echo tends to repeat the last few words. Makes sense, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How to operate an echo chamber Posted by: Madam Hatter
Hahah
Posted by: owlsliveintrees on Aug 11, 2006 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barbara Ehrenrich: movie critic. Oh wait, I thought she was a biologist, or maybe an expert on the history of warfare...oh wait, i thought she said she was an economist. Or maybe she's just a pinko tool. So she talks about an action movie, calling it silly before using it to make an unrelated attack about the rich. You know, the rich people who drop money on Alternet fundraising. You know, the people with 3 cars (one for the nanny) the wireless router, and the laptop for the highschool freshman. The people who put Nickled and DImed on the bestseller lsit. The capitalists who have thousands in disposable income, but someone find it convinient to attack those with millions of disposable income. The upper class would never knowingly support class warfare, cause they have the most to lose. Congratulations, your target audience consists entirely of hypocrits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hahah Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Hahah Posted by: Leman
» RE: Hahah Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Hahah Posted by: Leman
chad morritt
Posted by: chad on Aug 11, 2006 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The film's description appears accurate as a view of a considerable part of the USA.
Last year I returned after 25 years to Louisiana and New Orleans for a vacation and was appalled to find that nothing had changed in a quarter of a century. The only difference I could detect was in the design of the 1000's of new pick up trucks lined up at the dealerships. I live in Spain, a country totally transformed in every way in the last 25 years. I was so dismayed by the poverty and ignorance of the general poulation that I cut short the vacation.
Seen from the outside America now seems a very dangerous and uneducated country. I grew up as a lover of all things American , what has gone wrong? Is the country really controlled by an evil axis of Jewish zealots and crazy rightwing Christians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: chad morritt Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: chad morritt Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net
Um... OK...
Posted by: Patrick_Ross on Aug 11, 2006 3:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah. Miami Vice is a movie that is essentially about crime, and crime is kind of like this: the drop-off between being the obsenely wealthy criminal, and the dirt-poor criminal is very steep.

That's why crime doesn't pay (mostly).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Um... OK... Posted by: Rod in 83706
» RE: Um... OK... Posted by: Leman
» RE: Um... OK... Posted by: Patrick_Ross
ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Aug 13, 2006 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...DOES ANYBODY KNOW WHAT TIME IT IS, DOES ANYBODY CARE...???" WHETHER IT'S A MOVIE, A BOOK, A SEMINAR, ETC, WHY STOP WITH MIAMI VICE, WHAT ABOUT SOUTH TEXAS VICE, EAST LA VICE, ETC...??? A PERSON DOES NOT NEED A WEATHERMAN TO TELL HIM OR THAT ITS RAINING IN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD...IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS...THIS ARTICLE IS A WEAK ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHAT AILS OUR BELOVED NATION...THE ISSUES ARE NOT RICH VS POOR, BUT "GREEDY VS NONGREEDY"...EVERYTHING ELSE MIGHT BE DESCRIBED AS "MUTUAL MENTAL MASTURBATION..." REMEMBER :

"To put the world in order, we must first put the nation
in order; to put the nation in order, we must put the
family in order; to put the family in order, our personal
life, we must first set our hearts right. "- Confucius

"We must learn to live together as brothers or perish
together as fools. "- Martin Luther King

THESE THOUGHTS AND REFLECTIONS WERE TRUE WHEN WRITTEN AND ARE STILL TRUE TODAY...

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My feelings on cop shows ...
Posted by: kelt65 on Aug 14, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I strongly agree with this author :)

RESOLUTION FOR THE 1990's: BOYCOTT COP CULTURE!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrites?
Posted by: davidt on Aug 14, 2006 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look up the word hypocrite in a dictionary prior to using it Here is a hint--it's Greek.

What is hypocritical about living the life that she is talking about? Barbara LIVED in the FOUR corners of our country doing the work, demeaning, unnoticed, incessantly miserable and THEN she wrote about it.

What have you done "hypocrite watcher"?

I wonder just why some folks bother to read alternet.org's articles, when:

1. Do not need to hear the truth, since they know it already.
2. Do not need to hear the truth, since they watch Duh Tube.
3. Do not need to hear the truth, since they read A book.
4. Do not need to hear the truth, since they talk to FRIENDS.
5. Do not need to hear the truth, since they prefer DESSERTS

Unfortunately these ostrich-heads usually VOTE, and with about as much forethought as it takes to reach down and scratch their asses.

David T. Gray
Claremont, NH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement