Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Epic Battle Between Crosswords and Sudoku

By Matt Gaffney, The American Prospect. Posted August 10, 2006.


The massive success of the Japanese math puzzle has exposed a love-hate relationship between crossword die-hards and Sudoku players.
Advertisement

Wayne Gould has gotten rich off Sudoku. I’m talking many millions rich, and it’s all happened in the last two years -- but still, this past March, I had to feel a little sorry for the guy.

Will Shortz had just introduced Gould at the 29th annual American Crossword Puzzle Tournament, but the retired New Zealand judge received an embarrassingly tepid amount of applause from the audience of hardcore crossword solvers and writers. Why?

"There is a backlash against Sudoku," as Newsday crossword editor Stan Newman puts it. And, apparently, against Gould, who ignited global Sudoku mania by marching unannounced into the offices of the London Times in 2004 and hooking their features editor on his puzzle. I found Gould charming in a professorial, absentminded genius sort of way, but his talk bombed with the crossword crowd in Stamford, Connecticut. "British Airways sent a memo around telling flight attendants not to solve Sudoku during takeoffs and landings," he quipped, but almost nobody laughed.

Gould’s appearance at the tournament nicely illustrated the love-hate relationship the U.S. crossword community has with Sudoku. First, a little love: "I don’t solve crosswords anymore," top crossword writer Joe DiPietro says. "And for the first time in my life, if I am solving a crossword, I don’t care about finishing it. I do care about finishing Sudoku, though."

And now, a little hate: "Right when they started passing out Sudoku, I headed for the bar," veteran cruciverbalist Rich Silvestri told me, regarding the Sudoku tournament Gould held in Stamford after his talk. Top crossword solver Amy Reynaldo wrote on her blog about Gould’s contest: "I was most of the way through the first one when I made some sort of error and said, ‘Screw it. There’s a bar in this hotel,’ and went off to find socializing in lieu of Sudokuing."

There are two reasons why Sudoku drives so many crossword experts to drink. First, the artistic reason: Some puzzle writers view Sudoku as too boring, a mindless game you can practically brute-force a solution out of any time you want, like a word search. This criticism isn’t entirely fair, though, since Sudoku, like crosswords, can be calibrated to very high levels of solving difficulty, and there is a certain mathematical elegance in the deep logic required to unravel key areas of a well-made, tough Sudoku.

The deeper reason for the backlash is sheer resentment: Many of us have spent serious chunks of our lives honing the craft of crossword-puzzle writing, and along comes this computer-generated fad that’s winning the hearts and minds of the masses. If everyone loves Sudoku so much, who needs us anymore? With one click of his mouse, Gould -- who provides his puzzles free to 400 papers around the world as a marketing plan to sell his Sudoku-generating program -- quite possibly entertains more people than all the crossword writers in the United States combined. And because Sudoku isn’t language-specific, Gould’s reach is international to a much greater degree than ours is. Hence, the hurt feelings -- and the hostility. Pity the successful; they pay for it somehow.

How have American crossword pros reacted to this ego-crushing Sudoku tsunami? Some have utterly ignored it, hoping the fad will pass, but I can tell they feel like people who’ve rented during a real-estate boom. Others have used their crossword creds to ride the wave: Will Shortz’s books of Sudoku have sold a mind-blowing 5 million copies and counting in the past year. They’re books of high quality, to be sure, but high-quality Sudoku are easy to have a computer churn out, and anyone can put out a book of them (many have, including me). But in a suddenly popular field with no established gurus, Shortz’s name, emblazoned in huge print on the books’ covers, is the brand to which converting crossword fans have flocked in droves: One of his titles was the top-selling Sudoku book in the country last year.


Digg!

Matt Gaffney is the author of Gridlock: Crossword Puzzles and the Mad Geniuses Who Create Them. His crosswords have appeared in The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal, and Slate. Portions of this article were adapted from "Gridlock."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Apples and Oranges and Lemons
Posted by: marxalot on Aug 10, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sudoku and crosswords are both played on a grid of open squares. There the similarity ends. Yet the comparison is constantly made. I say I'm learning sudoku, they say oh I like crosswords better. It is like a rock climber complaining that rock collecting is too boring.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its a fad
Posted by: Angie on Aug 10, 2006 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just bought a sudoku book last week to see what all the hype was about. Mind you, my husband and I have been doing the NYT crosswords for years-- we complete an occasional Thurs. when we're hot. He, the wordsmith, isn't even interested in trying out sudoku. I've found sudoku to be an exercise in logic. Crosswords test your vocabulary, tell a story, have cleverness and wit and just engage more of your mind than "how can I deduce which number goes in this box". My husband started doing crosswords because his aunt had Alzheimer's and doing crosswords is supposed to stave it off. I don't see how American crosswords could become an international craze due to specific regional phrases and expressions.

I, for one, will not be buying another sudoku book (after I finish this one).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Playing to strengths
Posted by: chaoslegs on Aug 10, 2006 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have done crosswords, but since my schooling was always very heavy in math and science, my vocabulary and spelling are pretty weak. But those logic games play to my strengths, and I love them. I still like crosswords, and they help to improve my area of weakness, so that is good, but give me that logic puzzle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cisneros
Posted by: cisneros on Aug 10, 2006 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my morning paper, after finishing the front section, I go to the puzzles. First I do the sudoku, then I do the crossword. I love them both. What conflict?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agreed. Love 'em both. Posted by: hbw
OCA = WOOD SORREL
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 10, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a veteran crossworder too. One thing that has happened is that I have seen certain clues and answers together so many times that I can solve the entry without knowing what either the clue or the answer mean. Example: wood sorrel is always "oca". I finally searched them on Yahoo images and discovered that they were two names for a plant. It makes me chuckle to think that I could know two words for the same thing but not know what either one means.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OCA = WOOD SORREL Posted by: LMNOP
It's numbers........
Posted by: Mary Eman on Aug 10, 2006 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Give me a crossword any old time! I much prefer words to numbers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's numbers........ Posted by: YogiBear
I like crosswords better
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 12, 2006 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've tried only a few sudukos and completed some but when I finish it's like: so what? To me beside the smile and the aha after cracking a clever clue there is an admiration for the puzzlemaker. Although there are old clues and combinations and probably tricks of the trade, it still takes a lot of effort to create a crossword puzzle. As an added puzzle I usually try to guess from the clues whether the creator is an author or authoress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

insidious crossword addiction
Posted by: aliceinnyland on Aug 14, 2006 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't get sudoko at all : i am not a numbers person (though my dad, who is a huuuuuuge fan, swears it's "not about numbers at all, really") (of course, he is also the sort of parent who passes the time on long car trips by setting problems for his children in which we were asked to consider, for instance, two trains travelling at particular speeds, given particular wind conditions and levels of elevation. Under these circumstances, we were asked, which train would crash into the car stalled on the tracks first, and what would happen to the second train then?) (so maybe he's a numbers person).
Anyway. You might enjoy checking out my post on crosswords and Mr. Will Shortz at my blog, aliceinnewyorkland, on blogger. Scroll down: it's called "It's a will will will will world." Would love to hear what you think!
xox
alice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]