Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

IRS Schemes to Undermine Estate Tax

By Megan Tady, The NewStandard. Posted August 2, 2006.


The IRS has announced a drastic cut in staff who audit the tax returns of the super-rich -- Bush's gift to his wealthy supporters.
Advertisement

With a cut to the estate tax looking unlikely in Congress this year, the Bush administration is quietly planning to reduce the number of federal agents who enforce the tax. Critics are calling the move a "backdoor" repeal of the tax on extraordinary inheritances.

Through leaked internal agency documents, the New York Times discovered last week that the government plans to eliminate almost half of the Internal Revenue Service’s 345 lawyers who currently audit the tax returns of those subject to sharing a cut of their estate with the American public upon their deaths. The Times reported the staff reduction will be made within the next few months.

The estate tax is levied on the transfer of massive amounts of wealth to heirs upon death. It does not apply to portions of an estate transferred to a spouse or charitable organization.

Although some politicians and anti-estate-tax groups have launched aggressive campaigns to repeal the tariff, the Senate has so far refused to kill it. In June, the Senate voted 57-41 against repealing it. Last week, House Republicans attached the measure to a minimum wage hike bill in the hopes of winning over Democrats, but Senate Democratic leadership vowed to kill the measure again.

While unsuccessful at repealing or cutting the estate tax through legislation, critics say the Bush administration is effectively gutting the tax by eliminating enforcement staff, and offering a gift to America’s elite in the process.

"For the administration to turn around and say, ‘We’re going to get rid of the people tasked with enforcement of the estate tax,’ certainly looks like an effort at backdoor repeal," Lee Farris, senior organizer of estate-tax policy at progressive United for a Fair Economy, told TNS.

The IRS did not return interview requests made by TNS, but Kevin Brown, an IRS deputy commissioner, told the New York Times that he had ordered the cuts because "far fewer people were obliged to pay estate taxes under Bush's legislation."

The 2001 Bush tax cuts included gradual estate-tax exemptions for wealthy Americans until 2010, when the tax will be temporarily repealed for one year, before being fully reinstated in 2011. But while only around 6,300 people leave taxable estates each year, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive fiscal policy organization, and the Joint Committee on Taxation, an government advisory committee charged with monitoring federal tax policy, estimate that repealing the estate tax would create a $369 billion loss in revenue between 2007 and 2016.

Farris pointed out the irony in how the IRS job cuts coincide with a nearly $100 million increase of tax-enforcement funding included in a newly approved Senate appropriations bill. Given the personnel cut, critics predict the IRS will use the enforcement increases to go after low- and middle-income taxpayers instead of investigating wealthy tax evaders.

A 2006 study already found this trend to be true: taxpayers reporting less than $25,000 in income were six times more likely to undergo IRS audits in 2005 than those reporting earnings of $200,000 or more, according to the public-interest group Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, affiliated with Syracuse University

At the same time, Brown of the IRS told the Times that estate-tax lawyers are the most productive tax-law enforcement staff at the IRS, finding an average of $2,200 of taxes owed but not paid to the government each hour that they work. The IRS says a significant amount of taxes are never collected from all taxpayers. The IRS reports that the gross tax gap -- the difference between what taxpayers are obligated to pay, and what they actually pay -- surpasses $300 billion every year.

"It’s just really shocking that the administration would be willing to cut off its nose to spite its face," Farris said. "It just seems crazy to cut the staff that are bringing in the most money at the IRS."

The enforcement division cuts directly contradict the IRS’s stated objective to go after the richest tax evaders. In a March 2005 statement, the agency wrote, "We are ramping up our audits on high-income taxpayers and corporations, focusing more attention on abusive shelters and launching more criminal investigations."

Farris said the determination of the Bush administration to squelch the estate tax is testament that Bush is "willing to go to any length to satisfy" his wealthiest supporters.

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
“Honor System”
Posted by: shangrilalad on Aug 2, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like Republicans are switching to an “Honor System” when it comes to taxing the rich.

Too bad it doesn’t apply to the rest of us scumbags.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not so, Dittohead Posted by: russianblue1
Leona said it
Posted by: astockton on Aug 2, 2006 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only the little people pay taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Leona said it Posted by: BJT
» RE: Leona said it Posted by: Jesse
» oh Puhleeeze........ Posted by: Diecash1
The Estate Tax is immoral
Posted by: BJT on Aug 2, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one should pay a fee to the government for the death of a family member, no matter how wealthy they are.

While we're on the topic of immoral taxes, no one should have to pay a fee to the government for working at his job (income taxes), nor should anyone have to pay rent to the government for a home that he OWNS (property taxes).

When you combine the vast array of taxes aimed at all Americans, at the state and federal level, we often wind up paying over HALF of our earnings to the government.

Now who's causing all the poverty? The wealthy or the government?

Help the poor and abolish big government and the taxes that support it.

Oh, by the way, INCOME TAXES GO ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY TO INTEREST PAYMENTS ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S DEBT TO THE PRIVATE BANK CALLED "FEDERAL RESERVE." Your income taxes are the direct profits of a CORPORATION.

How warm and fuzzy do you feel about those income taxes now, jackyderms?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Estate Tax is immoral Posted by: tedbohne
» RE: The Estate Tax is immoral Posted by: tedbohne
yes, Viriginia
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 2, 2006 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, Virginia we do indeed have government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich. No thought is given to the crimes that many rich people commit in order to become rich. Money talks and it talks the loudest when when it is creating a fascist police state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yes, Viriginia Posted by: BJT
» RE: BJT Posted by: Lincoln fan
little people pay little taxes
Posted by: coldeye on Aug 2, 2006 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the majority of federal tax revenues are paid for by the upper 20% of earners and corporations. That's a fact. Many lower income people pay no tax. that's fine. This by the way after the much denounced "tax cuts for the rich", which resulted in the "rich" continuing to pay for programs they don't need or use like public education, welfare, social security and medicare.

Now there is an alleged problem with getting rid of estate taxes. Congress has tied the estate issue with the minimum wage increase which I agree is long overdue. Liberals should have their alleged prolabor views tested: how much do they hate the "rich" so that they would screw the "poor"? If that's the price in a GOP controlled Congress and a GOP President of raising the wage floor not only for the lowest paid but for folks just above minimum, that's a small price. The vast majority of estates including practically all of the middle class are exempt anyway.

The government should have already taxed the money accumalated in estates several times when the money was orgiinally earned or distributed as capital gains or dividends.

How many times is it just to tax the same dollar? Unless one believes that it is unjust to permit any gifts or bequests to heirs, why shouldn't heirs receive what's left of the donor's estate? The ethics of the estate tax evade me, other than a last shot at the "rich" by a society which envies the success most people are not lucky enough to have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: little people pay little taxes Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: little people pay little taxes Posted by: MatthewSavage
Just the facts, ma'am.
Posted by: mferg56 on Aug 2, 2006 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a fair and reasoned look at why the estate tax should be preserved, check out the Citizens for Tax Justice website, http://www.ctj.org/html/estbob.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The price of being ultra rich in America
Posted by: DCostello on Aug 2, 2006 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, let's put this in some perspective. 200 of the richest familes in America have spent, and continue spending, hundreds of millions of dollars to get rid of the estate tax. Do you think they do this to benefit the rest of the families in America? Don't be so naive. They do this to benefit themselves to the tune of several billions of owed tax dollars. That's what repealing the estate tax is about. And where do you think the government will get those several billions of tax dollars from if not from the ultra rich? The rest of us. Those who don't belong to the 200.

Personally, I don't mind the rich paying taxes and think they should pay more. Consider it the price of being rich in America. Here in America we allow you to get as rich as you'd like with very little restraint on how you do it and who you might crush to get there. But, when you die, we're going to take some of what you haven't managed to hide, transfer, or otherwise shelter. It's just the price of being ultra rich in America. Try being ultra rich somewhere else in the world and see what the price is there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Estate Tax really Killed Sam's Kids
Posted by: JSquercia on Aug 2, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes the Estate tax really hurt the Walton Kids . They are 5 of the 10 wealthiest families in America . What greedy bastards they are .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we need to do like the Swedes and the British
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 2, 2006 4:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tax these obscenely wealthy inheritances at 90%!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can this happen?
Posted by: packofwolves on Aug 2, 2006 9:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to know why and how Bush and his criminal cronies are allowed to rape our country like this? How can we have such an obvious crook screwing our country, stealing more daily from those that can afford it the least, and protecting the very people who screw you and me over out of greed? What's wrong with us...Demand IMPEACHMENT before it's too late.
Impeach Bush and All His Cronies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How can this happen? Posted by: DCostello
» RE: How can this happen? Posted by: mywalea
» RE: How can this happen? Posted by: captain
Please Do It!
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Aug 8, 2006 7:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like civil rights or any other great movement we need some elites to take up the banner and bring down the evil IRS. Its unconstitutional to tax wages. Isn't it bad enough to be forced to work to live but now some evil bureaucracy will take your livelehood and then spend it in some other state (or to make war on someone who has done you no harm.) It has always been unConstitutional and let's hope this is the first salvo in defeating this evil taxing system. Stop feeding the beast and it will die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]