Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Women Losing Economic and Political Ground

By Martha Burk, TomPaine.com. Posted July 27, 2006.


Women's rights in the U.S. are at a low not seen since the Fifties.
Advertisement

Summer isn't over yet, but the heat on women is already at full blast. Catalyst, one of the top research organizations on the status of women in corporate America, reports this week that females are losing ground in the top echelons of the Fortune 500. Growth in female-held positions has fallen dramatically in the past three years. The National Women's Law Center tells us that female degrees in math and computer science are way down. In what looks like a "back to the '50s move," Gov. Jennifer Granholm of Michigan signed a bill last week allowing the return of single-sex schools in her state. All abortions were outlawed in South Dakota this spring, setting up a challenge to Roe v. Wade that has a good chance of succeeding in a Roberts Court.

Is the world crashing in on US women all at once? Not exactly. The long slide down from the gains of the 1970s started a while back - we're just seeing the results more starkly and more frequently now.

Reflecting on the bad news of summer 2006, I am reminded of a recent speech I was invited to deliver to the All China Women's Federation. Since China's totalitarian government has the power to simply decree women's status in employment, education, personal liberty and even the home, I was told the audience would be particularly interested in whether our government helps or hurts women's progress.

My assigned topic was "The State of Women in the United States." Easy enough, until I started to really think about it. Should I talk about how women in the US are doing when compared to women elsewhere in the world? Or how American women compare to American men - socially, economically and politically. Still another approach would be a contrast of women now and say, the turn of the 20th century, before we even had the vote. Finally, I could talk about the state of US women compared to an ideal - where we would be if we could indeed "have it all."

I decided to talk about today's reality - how women's status in the first years of the 21st century, and not so coincidentally in the reign of George II, compares to how it looked at the start of the "second wave" of American feminism beginning about 1963. The ongoing losses are the culmination of 20-plus years of conservative influence in the public square. Thanks to well-funded and well-placed right-wing think tank policy papers and their media machines shaping public opinion and influencing legislatures at all levels, we're losing ground and fighting hard just to keep the ideals of women's equality in the public debate. Popular mythology is all about women fleeing the workplace and the marketplace of ideas for hearth and home - just read The New York Times and countless copycats touting the exodus.

From the first years since that vibrant second wave made so many gains - abortion rights, equal credit, pregnancy leave, anti-discrimination laws in education and employment - the backlash has continued unabated. Women in the US have now taken the proverbial two steps forward, one step back in many areas we thought were so secure a generation ago.

Thanks to Title IX, we have achieved parity with men in college degrees, but female enrollment is down in business schools, and there has been a 28 percent decline since 1984 in women getting science and math degrees. The Bush administration continues to weaken Title IX through rule changes - a major change to Title IX policy now allows schools to force girls, but not boys, to prove that they are interested in participating in sports before they are given the chance to play.


Digg!

Martha Burk is a political psychologist and author of "Cult of Power: Sex Discrimination in Corporate America and What Can Be Done About It."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's all so very depressing...
Posted by: Bev on Jul 27, 2006 7:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
along with everything else that's going on in our country and in the world. I'm not seeing a happy ending to all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You've Come A Long Way Baby...
Posted by: bookmonger on Jul 27, 2006 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Now It's Back To Being Chattel.

Back in high school in the 1970s the girls were more than vociferous, they were downright in-your-face insistent that girl's sports get the same facilities etc as boy's sports. I was not effected either way, but it did seem only fair. I was saddened that the ERA died. Life went on. Within 20 years these women were no longer the vanguard. Their daughters had taken over. I was - what's the word - offended ? Abortion was seen by far too many of their daughters as an abomination. Far too many of them sought "a man" to make themselves whole. Granted individually they might speak up if they feel slighted in regard to salary, but on the whole the very concept of the Glass Ceiling seems beyond their comprehension.

This article brings up several very frighteningly valid points. I fear that battles previously won shall in the future need to be re-fought. Battles not only for equality of the sexes, but indeed, for the very freedoms for which the country stood. Freedom formerly a beacon to the world, now under attack from within, is imperiled. I feel so alone when I proclaim the in the previous battle of the sexes, although women won, in reality both men and women were winners. Everyone wins when there is equality. When equality is lessened, all are losers. Dark days lie ahead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When God was a women
Posted by: mom'z the word on Jul 27, 2006 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
life were a lot better for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just look beyond the neo-liberal curtain!
Posted by: frode on Jul 28, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look to the left in France, Mexico, Spain, now Italy, Chile, Venezuela, etc.

The pinheads got Bush's America and we have the still human world!

Don't be duped: the struggle continues.

Lucidity is resistance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What? Posted by: Joe Ox
Imagine The Advantages
Posted by: Joe Ox on Jul 28, 2006 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women can measure as many parameters as they wish, and produce countless researched articles on how oppressed they are etc. So many things simply don't pass a child level smell test.
First, the complaining women, who from their very guy and heart feel the pain of being female in this country and decry it constantly, make not a mention of the plight of Arab women, indeed indirectly supporting those who hold sway over them, preventing education and even basic health care because a Dr may have to see them unclothed.
Secondly, imagine a man did what Andrea Yates did. Imagine he just lost his job, caught his wife in bed with his best friend, and found his dog of 12 years run over at the end of his driveway. He also has a history of depression and mental challenges, having been treated by several doctors.
Would he have been acquitted for insanity?
NO!
Its not so bad, now come on ladies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Imagine The Advantages Posted by: celticsweetgrass
» RE: complaining women Posted by: celticsweetgrass
» Wrong Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Wrong Posted by: planet doomed
» It's "not so bad"? Easy for Joe to say Posted by: BlueStateBitch
» Just tell me one Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Just tell me one Posted by: Ktflake
» RE: Just tell me one Posted by: planet doomed
» Andrea Yates Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Andrea Yates Posted by: dilley
» RE: Imagine The Advantages Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: Imagine The Advantages Posted by: celticsweetgrass
I think women are no longer interested in blazing trails
Posted by: Nosila Sevarg on Jul 28, 2006 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women have given up and decided they want life the way it was when most women didn't HAVE to work.
Despite the romaniticized version of having a job and all the glorification of female employment Gloria Steinem and Betty Freidan espoused, work is actually a lot more drudgery than most people care to admit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sixties Are So Over
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 29, 2006 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is a propaganda piece. certain behavior approved in the 60's(a long time ago folks) is referred to, and then if people voluntarily choose to move to new or even older behavior patterns than 60's orthodoxy, "woe is me" is the reaction.

single sex schools for example. first, they were on the ropes long before the sixties. liberal reformers like Dewey and his disciples who dominated teaching hated them. no doubt most female public schools, while often elite schools, did not have equal faculties or equipment to elite boys schools. Yet today's public schools are mediocre, sex takes up huge amounts of time in social behavior, and interest. Academics are a joke,

As our schools become more "diverse", groups like spanish speakers suffer rocketing pregnancy rates in high school.

serious articles are written about single sex schools. Predominately female schools are not inherently unequal any more than predominantly "minority" schools(there are no more "minorties" in America). Quoting language by dead judges who faced situations unlike today does no one any good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good Piece Posted by: Joe Ox
concernedDad
Posted by: concernedDad on Aug 7, 2006 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women's rights at a loss??? Maybe so. Maybe the super rights women have gotten are finally being reviewed for their constitutionality under the equal protections clause of the US constitution. But I doubt it. Frankly of all the superior rights I'm told I have as a "man" I'd like to just be judged first and foremost "by the content of my character" as a parent instead of head bashing against judges that believe a woman is simply by her nature the superior parent - how about speaking out against those judges that are so sexist as to prefer mothers over fathers simply for their gender ladies? So for the women moaning about rights going away - think about whether these are really equal rights to begin with. How's a woman's right to an abortion an equal right??? Where's the equal right for a father? Why should a woman even be allowed to kill her own baby? How's the bias towards women as sole custodians in our "family" courts equality?? It's not. Women have for decades enjoyed some of the most significant superior rights in our country. I'm so sick and tired of listening to women moan about having to take care of their kids when fathers have to struggle even just to see them when the courts have ordered them able to but their mothers play games and get away with them. No doubt not every mother moans caring for children and not every father wants to care for their kids but I'm one such dad that does prefer raising kids over working outside the home and I have heard from way to many mothers complaining about their kids and their rights and their husbands. To those women: get therapy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe they don't want it.
Posted by: KellyMac on Aug 8, 2006 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello? Do you think that maybe the reason there aren't more women in the upper echelons of Fortune 500 companies, is because there are more men than women who want those positions? Let's face it, women are more about home life and caring for their children, and men are more about making it to the top. There are, of course, exceptions, but generally speaking, that's the rule.

Just because the feminist movement wants female domination, doesn't mean your everyday woman wants to dominate. Sorry, ladies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Life is more complicated
Posted by: brasa on Aug 17, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with most of the writer's assertions about the status of women in the top eschelons, the lack of women in math and science, etc, I do not think it is a simple case of regression. The reality is, that Americans work more overtime, take less leave, and the cost of living is much higher in the increasing urban areas than ever before.
Who takes off time for maternity leave? Women. If we want to enjoy our children and raise them with attention, somebody has to work less. (Those of us who can actually afford to take the time, that is. Precious few of us can.) As a middle school teacher, I witness firsthand the effects of children who play second fiddle to the endless grind of their parents' careers or their struggle to simply make rent. It cuts across class lines. Unjustly, the ripple effects of stay at home parenting means that women more than men fall behind on the career track, and old gender stereotypes are in danger of being re-entrenched. How ridiculous it is to assert that women are not "interested in blazing trails". How does one corroborate that theory? On the brighter side, I know more and more stay at home dads. Why not create career tracks that protect parents rights to take long leaves and still stay on track? This would benefit mainly women.
I also would caution people not to assume that same sex schooling is bad for girls. In sixth grade, I often notice girls being one to two years ahead of the boys in their ability to manage projects and handle more difficult abstractions. I'm not saying I believe in same sex schools; I actually believe kids learn a lot from differences, etc, etc. I'm just saying it's not so simple to assume that girls would be on the losing end. In fact, single sex schools make sure that girls cannot take a back seat to the boys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]