Corporate Media Censors MoveOn

By Joel Bleifuss, In These Times. Posted July 27, 2006.

Perhaps you have thought, "If the voters knew how venal a GOP member of Congress was, they could never get re-elected."

MoveOn is testing that proposition with a public service ad campaign that targets four Republican candidates whose votes in Congress have put special interest profits before the public good.

"Caught red-handed" is the moniker for a series of MoveOn TV ads that expose the lawmakers' fealty to the corporations that fund their campaigns. MoveOn PAC Director Eli Pariser puts it this way: "The most visible and insidious form of corruption is the form that is also legal, and that is the money politicians take from big companies and the votes that they give in return to help those companies out."

Take, for example, Rep. Deborah Pryce, the fourth ranking GOP leader in the House. She represents suburban Columbus, Ohio, and was on the receiving end of this ad:

Announcer: Congresswoman Deborah Pryce--she accepted more than $100,000 from energy companies and she voted against bills that would have penalized those companies for price gouging. (On Screen: a series of black-and-white photographs of Rep. Pryce.)

Announcer: Instead of protecting us, Congresswoman Pryce has been caught red-handed, protecting oil company profits while we pay more at the pump. (On Screen: a close-up of Rep. Pryce's hand in one of the photos as an invisible brush paints her hand red.)

Announcer: Tom DeLay, Dick Cheney, Jack Abramoff. And now Deborah Pryce. Another Republican caught red-handed. (On Screen: Pictures of DeLay, Cheney and Abramoff flash across the screen, all with red-stained hands.)

To help the Democrats pick up 15 seats and gain control of the House, MoveOn PAC decided to concentrate not on the hotly contested races but on second-tier races where Republican incumbents had a good, but not insurmountable, lead in the polls. Besides Rep. Pryce, MoveOn has set its sights on Rep. Nancy L. Johnson (R-Conn.), Rep. Thelma Drake (R-Va.), and Rep. Chris Chocola (R-Ind.).

Each has been confronted with three waves of ads. The first, which aired in early April, focused on the votes that protected energy corporations from price gouging, as mentioned above. The second ad concentrates on votes by the four that prohibited the federal government from negotiating lower prices with the drug companies.

The ad aimed at Rep. Johnson shows a grandmotherly figure empty a pill bottle into her hand as the voiceover says, "Seniors relied on her. Yet Congresswoman Johnson accepted $400,000 from big drug companies and got caught red-handed voting for a law that actually prevents Medicare from negotiating lower drug prices for our seniors."

The third takes the representatives to task for votes against a bill that would have instituted criminal penalties against war profiteers like Halliburton. As a fist-full of money changes hands, a voice over reads: "Congresswoman Thelma Drake accepted $25,000 from defense contractor PACs. Then she opposed penalties for defense contractors like Halliburton who overcharged the military in Iraq at a time when soldiers didn't have enough body armor."

Indeed, in March, Drake voted against a Democratic bill that would have blocked firms that had been found to overcharge the government by $100 million or more from receiving any further contracts. The targeted Congress members are crying foul. In Indiana, Rep. Chocola expressed his anger that the ads have implicated him in voting in the interests of big oil, which contributed $80,000 to his campaigns, and the pharmaceutical industry, which has contributed $48,500. He denounced MoveOn as "a radical group that does not share the views or values of the people of the 2nd district."

In Connecticut, Rep. Johnson hit back with an ad attacking MoveOn: "A radical group whose ads have been called 'shameful' and misleading' is at it again. ... this group compared America's leaders to Nazis." That Nazi comment refers to one of 15,000 ads submitted in 2004 to the MoveOn.org Web site as part of a contest. The ad was subsequently taken down by MoveOn.

Rushing to the defense of the GOP incumbents, the Republican National Committee went on the offensive on June 9, apparently supplying the Pryce, Drake and Chocola campaigns with text for a letter that the campaigns could send to stations that ran MoveOn's ads. The letter Drake for Congress sent stations read in part:

The newest ad attacks Congresswoman Drake personally for allegedly protecting war profiteers and goes on to implicitly accuse the congresswoman of taking bribes. These ads are reckless, malicious and false, casting Ms. Drake in a false light by accusing him [sic!] of unsubstantiated criminal conduct. We also believe the republication of these allegations by your organization ... subjects your organization to the same potential liability for defamation as MoveOn.org.

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »