Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Our Willful Blindness in Lebanon

By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted July 26, 2006.


Bush could stop Israel in its tracks with a snap of his fingers. But why would he? Israel is doing his bidding.
Advertisement

On Friday morning, as I traveled north on Interstate 5, I passed two tractor-trailers heading south toward the 32nd Street Naval Station in downtown San Diego. Each vehicle carried about 10 unmarked bombs; each bomb was approximately 15 feet long. Two military helicopters hovered low above each tractor-trailer, providing overhead escort. I wondered where these bombs were headed. They must have been in a big hurry because they usually ship their bombs more covertly.

Israel had just put out an S.O.S. to the United States government to rush over several more bombs. "The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration," according to the New York Times. Although always well-equipped with sophisticated U.S.-made weapons, Israel was evidently running out of munitions to drop on the Lebanese people.

Washington loses no opportunity to scold Iran and Syria for providing weapons to Hezbollah. Yet during the Bush administration, from 2001 to 2005, Israel received $10.5 billion in foreign military financing -- the Pentagon's biggest military aid program -- and $6.3 billion in U.S. arms deliveries. Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. foreign military assistance.

The U.S. Arms Export Control Act stipulates that foreign countries receiving weapons from the United States must use them solely for defensive purposes or to maintain internal security. During the last major Israeli incursion into Lebanon, in 1981, the Reagan administration cut off U.S. military aid and arms deliveries for 10 weeks while it investigated whether Israel was using weapons for "defensive purposes."

Last week, both houses of Congress, mindful of the importance of retaining Jewish votes and campaign contributions, passed resolutions stating that Israel was acting in self-defense. The vote in the Senate was unanimous; the House vote was 410 to 8. Walking in lockstep with Bush, neither resolution calls for a ceasefire. The Senate resolution praises Israel for its "restraint" and the House resolution "welcomes Israel's continued efforts to prevent civilian casualties."

U.S.-provided Israeli bombs have killed nearly 400 Lebanese, of whom the overwhelming majority were innocent civilians. The bombing has displaced half a million people and caused an estimated $1 billion in damage.

After Israel ordered people in southern Lebanon to evacuate their homes, several vehicles filled with evacuating Lebanese civilians were bombed by the Israeli military.

An Israeli helicopter fired a missile at a white minibus carrying 19 people fleeing Tairi. Three people were killed and several wounded.

A green Mercedes with a family fleeing Mansuri was struck by an Israeli missile. Three lay dead, while others were severely injured. Eight-year-old Mahmoud Srour's face was burned beyond recognition.

As Zein al-Abdin Zabit evacuated with his wife and four sons, his white Nissan was hit by an Israeli missile. "It's nothing more than revenge, revenge on civilians," Zabit said as he lay in bed with broken ribs.

Human Rights Watch confirmed yesterday that Israel is using artillery-delivered cluster munitions in populated areas of Lebanon. "Cluster munitions are unacceptably inaccurate and unreliable weapons when used around civilians," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch. "They should never be used in populated areas."

The use of cluster munitions in populated areas of Iraq caused more civilian casualties than any other factor in the U.S.-led coalition's major military operations in March and April 2003, killing and wounding more than 1,000 Iraqi civilians, HRW reported. HRW photographed U.S.-produced/U.S.-supplied cluster bombs among the arsenal of Israel Defense Forces artillery teams stationed on the Israeli-Lebanese border during a July 23 research visit.

Independent journalist Dahr Jamail reported that the Lebanese Ministry of Interior has confirmed the Israelis have used the incendiary white phosphorous gas. This is a chemical weapon, much like napalm, that can burn right down to the bone. The U.S. military used white phosphorous in Fallujah, Iraq.

Article 35 of Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions prohibits the use of weapons "of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering." Cluster bombs and white phosphorous fall into this category.


Digg!

Marjorie Cohn, professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, is president-elect of the National Lawyers Guild and the U.S. representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The definition of hypocrisy
Posted by: BackintheRed on Jul 26, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rice's trip to Lebanon to express our support -- while Bush fiddles and we rush bombs to Israel -- is just the latest reason why no one should be shocked if the U.S. has not one remaining shred of credibility. Such blatant, unabashed hypocrisy tends to have that effect.

BackInTheRed.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The definition of hypocrisy Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: The definition of hypocrisy Posted by: BackintheRed
How do you make peace with terrorists who want to destroy you?
Posted by: thinkprogress on Jul 26, 2006 1:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel haters need to understand Israel is officially recognized by the United Nations as a sovereign country. The day after officially becoming their own state in 1948, all of Israel’s Arab neighbors launched a war against Israel. Israel put them all down and later Arab neighbors again launched a war to destroy Israel. Israel again put them down but this time Israel created a buffer zone to protect it from future attack. Any other sovereign country would have done the same.

We have seen what happens when Israel takes the word of Palestinian terrorists. Palestinian terrorist said ‘please give us Gaza back, we promise we won’t use the land to attack you again’ and soon as Israel gave them Gaza they started launching rockets at Israel and they built tunnels which they sent suicide bombers through and they killed and kidnapped Israeli soldiers. The same goes for the Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon. The terrorists said ‘we promise, if you just give us the land we won’t use it to attack you’ then once they got the land they used it for exactly that, the latest event kidnapping Israeli soldiers and launching so far over a thousand rockets into Israel.

The nations of the world recognize Israel’s right to exist via the UN but the blood thirsty Palestinian terrorists and the Hezbollah terrorists want nothing short of Israel’s total destruction, the last thing they want is peace with Israel. Anyone doubting this needs to do a search for Hezbollah’s charter which calls for the total destruction of Israel and while you are at it read how Hamas, which controls the Palestinian government also has an official policy of bye-bye Israel.

How can Israel make peace with neighbors that are proven time-honored liars and have an official policy of Israel’s total destruction? History has proven such a suggestion is absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Israel haters Posted by: Arvy
» RE: Israel haters Posted by: marklar
Did the Hamas offer to recognize Israel lead to the current bombing of Lebanon?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 26, 2006 2:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1802862,00.html

This story, posted on June 21, describes a major shift in the stance of Hamas:

"Hamas performs about-turn on Israeli state
· Document recognises Israel's right to exist
· Shift away from founding goal of an Islamic state

Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
Wednesday June 21, 2006
The Guardian

Hamas has made a major political climbdown by agreeing to sections of a document that recognise Israel's right to exist and a negotiated two-state solution, according to Palestinian leaders.

In a bitter struggle for power, Hamas is bowing to an ultimatum from the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, to endorse the document drawn up by Palestinian security prisoners in Israeli jails, or face a national referendum on the issue that could see the Islamist group stripped of power if it loses."

This was a huge chance for peace, which Israel immediately dismissed, and which apparently led to a deep division in Hamas. We also know know that an Israeli military officer was showing slides of a Lebanon invansion around Washington nine months ago - this was a planned action, and a successful peace process would have brought it to a halt. Hezbollah was also planning for such an action, or was at least well-prepared for it. (see http://www.juancole.com/). I can't help thinking that there were people on both sides who wanted a major outbreak of violence.

Furthermore, sane people don't hate Israel - we just want them to stop using military force in place of diplomacy, especially when US tax dollars and US armaments are allowing them to bomb civilian targets all over Lebanon. The US should be supporting Israeli elements that are actually interested in peace, not the desperate warmongers. The real threat is a sudden outbreak of war on a much larger scale, which would mean a great many more deaths of innocents on all sides. A ten-day halt in all military and financial aid to the Israeli regime would send the right message - your irrational actions are going to have unintended consequences.

Sure has taken the media focus off that pesky illegal domestic spying scandal, hasn't it? If only a cute intern had been sexually involved - then it'd be on the front page every day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's pretty obvious who runs our foreign government
Posted by: marklar on Jul 26, 2006 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush could stop Israel in its tracks with a snap of his fingers. But why would he? Israel is doing his bidding.

We are now a willing partner in Izraels OCCUPATION of Arab lands and destruction of their societies. Our OCCUPATION of Iraq is exactly like Izraels in Palestine and now Lebanon.
Americans are blinded by corporate media propaganda, AIPAC, AIE and The Heritage Institute, aka THE ISRAEL LOBBY, into believing that sensless war and atrocities against Arabs are protecting us. Wider war is coming, all out war, and China and other nations will not sit idle while their oil resouirces are threatened by ideolgical and religious crackpots wage war for war's sake. We have become the Evil Empire, like it or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lovely
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 26, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a lovely combination we have in the Middle East, the Bushies committing war crimes in Iraq and the Israelis committing war crimes in Lebanon. It seems the worst terrorists in the world have US/Israeli passports.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hate to Burst Your Bubble Ms. Cohn
Posted by: Whistler on Jul 26, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is correct about everything EXCEPT:

"Bush could stop Israel in its tracks with a snap of his fingers."

Bush does not have the power to do that. Such a move would put him in the same place as the growing pile of dead bodies in the Enron affair. Accidents, suicides, heart attacks (oh, how coincidental and such perfect timing).

Tel Aviv runs the United States - not the other way around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You
Posted by: Dee1276 on Jul 26, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I respect and admire anyone brave enough to speak out against the slaughter in Lebanon. This clear sighted, fact filled article gives is a light in the darkness of American ignorance and stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just a thought
Posted by: snoringbear on Jul 26, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is not the definition of a terrorist or terrorist state one that purposely attacks civilians? Guess not if we or one of our allies does so. Now they attack the UN. Who are the real terrorists here? All this over 3 kidnaped soliders? What is the real agenda here? Why has our government done nothing to stop this? How is it that Israel has so much influence over our government? Think about these questions and the answers and decide for yourselves what is right. THINK FOR YOURSELVES!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: just a thought Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Bush won't move!
Posted by: kgs1947 on Jul 26, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can an alcoholic face truth? Not until he is taken to task by outlining the truth and a spiritual awakening. Bush claims to be speaking "truth" and having been "saved" by Jesus. He won't move from his rigid beliefs because he remains an active alcoholic...if he's not drinking, he is thinking and behaving just as if he were drinking. There's no hope till he starts to admit his own demons! That's not going to happen perhaps until he is taken up before the World Court on charges of terrorism. And, that is not a far-fetched possibility. There's already a growing movement to have him impeached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History and Irony
Posted by: cynyk on Jul 26, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Saddam will be going on trial soon for deliberately targeting innocent civilians while putting down a Kurdish insurrection. Meanwhile, the Israelis are doing the same thing in southern Lebanon and the world does nothing to stop it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: History and Irony Posted by: Arvy
Is Rice a pasty - or has she outlived her usefulness to the neocons?
Posted by: srqwolf on Jul 26, 2006 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wingnuts attack Rice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FAMILY'S NAZI PAST HAUNTS BUSH
Posted by: fiskhus on Jul 26, 2006 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Israelis cannot be unaware of Sen. Prescott Bush's financial dealings supporting the NAZI Party in WWII Germany. In fact, since much of the Bush Family fortune appears to derive from slave labor at Auschwitz, it's a good bet that the Bush Family's history is well-known to Israel.

The Israelis have been known to use such knowledge for blackmail in the past - most notably, they used evidence of Standard Oil's dealings with the NAZIs to silence Nelson Reockefeller's opposition to the formation of the State of Israel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FAMILY'S NAZI PAST HAUNTS BUSH Posted by: Conservasaurus
Racist????
Posted by: bj on Jul 26, 2006 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, and Jews are just as brown as Arabs--racist? Get a dictionary as well as a few history books browngoddess

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israel bashers, pay attention:
Posted by: robinka33 on Jul 26, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all your intelligence, Ms. Cohn and others here, your sight is short when it comes to the situation as it exists in the middle east and the "Israel/Jewishl problem" as I have seen it expressed.

We do not live in a world where everyone is equal in understanding, compassion, intelligence, humanity. Israel has been the focus of HATE from the surrounding Arab countries since its inception in 1948.
When Hamas said they would honor Israels right to exist, it was countered with a kidnapping of Isreali soldiers and much to all of our horror and chagrin, Israel's response was to raise a mighty hand back with destruction of Hezbollah as its goal.

It is very sad, too too bad that innocent loving human beings in Lebanon are being killed, maimed and displaced from their homes. The other side is that Hezbollah is suffereing many losses. I wish we lived in a world where war was not utiized to solve differences and that diplomatic solutions always worked. I am aware that it won't stop until the players in the game stop using the same old strategies that keep on not working. Perhaps we can somehow communicate with those who would rather rid the world of people unlike themselves than try to create peace. But that takes time, and patience for the state of the human race.

Until that time, let's muster up all the compassion we can for peoples whose lives are destroyed by the consequences of ugly repulsive war. NO matter which side they are on.

Thanks,

Robin, happy to be Jewish in New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Young Boy Gets More Toys
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jul 26, 2006 4:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can hear Israel, acting like a spoiled young boy in a wealthy family, get more toys-in this case, American military materiel, to use against Hezbollah "targets" in beleaguered Lebanon.
Lebanon, a country with a weak army, surely cannot match Israeli firepower blow by blow, as it will lead to its self-destruction.
Meanwhile, the world winces and sits on its asses as the United States says to the boy, "go ahead and do what you must with our toys. We love you and we want you to have these toys. If you need more, just holler."
Four "blue helmets" were killed and Israel says-"Oops, they got in the way. My bad."
The Lebanese are screaming for the shelling to stop. Apparently Israel's toys crippled its northern neighbor. All this for two captured soldiers. Pathetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israel/US aim possible genocide
Posted by: harpy on Jul 26, 2006 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As usual, our "representatives" are out there delivering their double speak and ignoring the aggressions of Israel. For an informative video, check out http://brasscheck.com/videos/middleeast/me1.html.
Looks like their aim is to help Israel commit genocide of the Arab people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran and the US
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 26, 2006 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israeli is probably seen by Iran as the local representative of the US.

Iran funds Hezbollah to attack Israel in order to piss off the US.

The US funds Israel and sits back letting Israel destroy Lebanon because this pisses off Iran.

That's my theory, anyway. Sorry if everybody already realised this long ago...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If anyone's interested...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 26, 2006 5:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an email I received last night from an Israeli friend. He moved from America to Israel as a teenager in the early seventies and he and his family are big supporters of the rights of Palestinians, interestingly enough.

"Q & A: The 15th Day

0 Who is winning this war?

On the 15th day of the war, Hizbullah is functioning and fighting. That by itself will go down in the annals of the Arab peoples as a shining victory.

When a featherweight boxer faces a heavyweight and is still standing in the 15th round - that is a victory, whatever the final outcome.


0 Can Hizbullah be pushed out of the border area?

The question is based on a misunderstanding of the essence of Hizbullah.

Not by accident is the organization call Hizb-Allah ("Party of Allah") and not Jeish-Allah ("Army of Allah"). It is a political organization, with deep roots in the Shiite population of South Lebanon. For all practical purposes, it represents this community. The Shiites are 40% of the Lebanese population, and together with the other Muslims they form the majority.

Hizbullah can be "moved" only if the whole Shiite population is moved - an ethnic cleansing that (I hope) no one is thinking about. After the war the population will return to their towns and villages, and Hizbullah will continue to flourish.


0 What would happen if the Lebanese Army were deployed along the border?

That has been one of the slogans of the Israeli government from the first moment. They will announce this as the main victory. That is very convincing - for anyone who has no idea about the complexities of Lebanon.

Anyone who was in Lebanon in 1982 and saw the Lebanese Army in action knows that it is not a serious army. Furthermore, many of its officers and soldiers are Shiites. Such a force will not fight Hizbullah.

Its deployment in the South would depend entirely on the agreement of Hizbullah - and that also applies to every day it stays there.


0 Would an international force help?

Ditto. That is a slogan especially tailored for diplomats, who look for an idea they can easily agree on. It sounds nice, especially if one adds the word "robust".

What exactly is the robust international force supposed to do?

It is proposed that it will remove Hizbullah from the border area. Not by words - like the hapless UNIFIL, that everyone ignored right from the beginning - but by force.

If the deployment of this force were to take place with the agreement of both sides - Israel and Hizbullah - alright. It may serve as a ladder for the Israeli government to climb down from the tree it has climbed up.

But if the force is placed there contrary to the will of Hizbullah, a guerilla war against it will start. Will the international force stand up and fight in a place which the mighty Israeli army fled with its tail between its legs?

For Israel, there will be a special dilemma: what will happen if Hizbullah attacks Israel in spite of the force? Will the Israeli army enter the area, risking a clash with the international force? With German soldiers, for example?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Opposing views - from a member of Hezbollah and an Israeli government minister
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 26, 2006 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This War was cooked in US
Posted by: ng1944 on Jul 27, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole thing with Lebanon is set up.
Elections are in november.
Bush badly needs anything that will divert attention
from Irak. Why do You think Israels PM was here,
and what they were talking about.
For couple of billion dollars this client state will do anything.
This is only prelude to bombing Iran and Syria.
Thats why constantly You can hear: Hesbollah is here,
they are going to Nuke us, bomb Iran, bomb Syria.
Our Knesset, sorry Congress, sits and doing nothing,
they are pretty comfortable with all this crime

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bargaining lives
Posted by: shyguy709 on Jul 31, 2006 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, I think I get it, until when Israel and the US stops practising unsafe sex then some humans on this planet would breathe.

Ceasfire is unevitable yet the death toll of innocent civilians is evitable. Didn't the Isreali UN ambassador called Hezbollah a cancer that had to be rooted out...then he calls the death scene in Qata a 'tragic mistake' tey acknowledges that the 'would be dead persons already' and thos who manage to survive where co-habitting with missiles 'unknowingly'

Can someone answer my 8 yr old cousin who asked me after watching and hearing that most of those kileld in the Qata 'tragic bombing mistake' where Children? And why children die most during conflicts? Don't ask me where that knowledge come from?she saw it on TV and she needs answers

I could not provide it at that time...can someone tell me what i should tell her?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]