Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

They Don't Call It the White House for Nothing

By Greg Palast, GregPalast.com. Posted July 22, 2006.


The NAACP never expected much from George Bush, and his speech at its convention did nothing to change that.
story+teaser_bush_oprah_kiss
They Don't Call It the White House for Nothing

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Greg Palast

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

God lost this time. I counted: Bush mentioned God only six times in his speech to the NAACP yesterday. The winner was "faith" -- which got seven mentions, though if you count "The Creator" as God, well, then the Lord tied it.

Coming in right behind God and Faith, other big mentions in the First Home Boy's rap included: The Voting Rights Act, his family's "commitment to civil rights," the "death tax," rebuilding New Orleans, "public school choice" and "soft bigotry."

As the philosopher Aretha Franklin once said, "Who's zoomin' who?"

Let's take it one point at a time.

Death and Taxes: Inheritance taxes apply only to those who leave assets exceeding $2 million. Mr. Bush realized how crucial this issue was to the NAACP. He said, "The [current] 'death tax' will prevent future African American entrepreneurs from being able to pass their assets from one generation to the next." His heart went out to the families of Gulf Coast flood victims who discovered that they could collect only the first two million bucks of their inheritance tax-free. Apparently, Mr. Bush heard that, among the 2,000 folk drowned in New Orleans, there were several millionaires. Luckily, the rumor proved false.

School Choice: Our Voucher Salesman-in-Chief offered the Black folk a truly exciting deal:

"When we find schools that are not teaching and will not change, our parents should have a different optionĀ· charter schools and public school choice and opportunity scholarships to be able to enable parents to move their child out of a school that's not teaching."

What he meant in this statement that was nearly in English ("to be able to enable"?) was that his No Child Left Behind Act gives all parents the right to move their kids to better schools.

Indeed, the Behind Act does require school systems to offer that choice. In New York, for example, a third of a million students qualify under the law to escape poorly performing schools -- but only 8,000 could do so. Mr. Bush forgot to include the money for the moves. But hey, his parents never asked for a handout to move him to Phillips Andover Academy.

Voting Rights Act -- This was a big applause line. Bush gloated about his convincing the White Sheets Caucus of the Republican Party to go along with the renewal of the Voting Rights Act. But he forgot to mention the fine print. The Southern GOP only went along with renewing the law on the understanding that the law would never be enforced.

Think I'm kidding? Check this: in July 2004, the US Civil Rights Commission voted to open a civil and criminal investigation of his brother's Administration in Florida for knowingly conducting a racially-biased scrub of voter rolls. In April 2004, Governor Jeb Bush, of the "family committed to civil rights," personally ordered this new purge of "felons" from voter rolls, despite promising never to repeat the infamous scrub of 2000. The new purge violated a settlement he signed with the, uh, the NAACP.

It also violated the Voting Rights Act. The Civil Rights Commission turned the case over to the US Justice Department which, two years on, has yet to begin the investigation. That's not to say President Bush did nothing. He swiftly removed every member of the Commission who voted to investigate his brother.

Ownership Society -- Our President was really excited recounting how he spoke to actual Black people in Mississippi, asking how many of them had 401(k) investment plans. Strangely, he didn't ask them if they had health insurance. Since Mr. Bush took office, the number of African-American adults without it has grown to 7.3 million. That's a kind of death tax, too, Mr. President.
Soft Bigot -- Our President completed the White-washing of his record by railing against, "the soft bigotry of low expectations. If you have low expectations," he said, "you're going to get lousy results."

Well, the NAACP never expected much from this President, and the results have proved his point.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bush's White House a whole lot darker than Clinton's but nobody cares.
Posted by: thinkprogress on Jul 22, 2006 12:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No President in history has elevated more minorities to positions of power than George W. Bush.

But go back to bashing him.

Don't let that inconvenient fact get in the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who's the Bigot in the House Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Smack Down. Posted by: deo508
» Uncle Toms all. Powell, Rice, etc??? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Where's the Bigot Table???? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: "shutter"? Posted by: Plexius
» RE: "shutter"? Posted by: Conservasaurus
Bush God
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 22, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has faith in himself and God because he loves God NOT. Bush has "faith" in God because this is his ticket to fortune and fame. He's big on God/faith because, like big money preachers, it's his ticket to hoped-for dictatorship with a willing bunch of hangers-on. Bush learned to lie a lot from listening to preachers that lie a lot and make a fortune from it. Cheney is the perfect match/thinker for Bush. Cheney and Rove can coach Bush to say the darndest lie-things and make people believe them. The Bushies are lying their way to death and destruction around the world and coaching the Israelis on how to do it and get away with it, also. Stop these torturing neanderthals by IMPEACHING them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just A
Posted by: the islander on Jul 22, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush the Divider living in the White-Out House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just A Posted by: Plexius
Bush only appears racist.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jul 22, 2006 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason that Bush appears racist is because the NAACP is powerful enough to get an audience with him. His remarks would have been just as stupidly ironic if he'd mouthed them before a group of poor whites. The rub is that poor whites never get an audience. Republicans aren't anti-black they're anti-poor.

The problem of the average citizen is that both parties are financed by the same corporatoctacy and that's who they serve. I believe that we can use the power of our votes before the election to make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality.

Click on Grassroots

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush only appears racist. Posted by: squattyroo
» RE: squattyroo Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: squattyroo Posted by: squattyroo
» RE: squattyroo Posted by: Lincoln fan
Racist Bastards
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 22, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush is only in the White house because his disgusting baby brother, Jeb, and everybody's favorite political call girl, Katherine Harris were able to illegally remove 57,000 African Americans from the list of elegible voters in 2000. Why has no one been prosecuted for this crime against our republic?

And what the hell is wrong with the NAACP?? How could they even allow that hideous bastard in their midst? Are they not aware of what he and Jebby boy did? Don't they realize that, more than ANY other segment of society, it is black people who have suffered the most from this contemptable, criminal administration?

I watched that speech live on MSNBC (I thankfully taped it) and I was heartened by the fact that there was at least one member of that organization who had the courage - really, the common sense - to shout the miserable son of a bitch down. Although he used the NAACP toward his own purposes during the campaign of 2000, he ignored them for the next six years. And now that it is an election years....

Don't be lulled into the stupid argument that the Bushes have done so much for African Americans because of the promotions of people like Clarence Thomas and Condi Rice. The great Malcom X had a term for people like them: "House Niggers".

The fact is this: The GOP has got to retain control of both houses of congress in November because, if they don't, the First Fool will be removed from office before his term has ended. Bush and Karl Rove both know this. They also know that, after all the investigations are over they'll both eventually end up (along with most of that administration) in federal prison. Trying to reach out to African Americans via the NAACP is an act of pathetic desperation. It is nothing more.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
The Daily Rant

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: acist Bastards Posted by: willymack
» . current supreme court Posted by: aurora2484
» RE: acist Bastards Posted by: fmarinjr
» poor choice of words Posted by: aurora2484
Liberal and progressive whites
Posted by: blackinjun on Jul 22, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can't get it..they really think that their view of the world is for the "common good" but that's only when that common good is mostly favorable to them. Negros like those who "knew he (bush) could handle it" (the protest from black folks)..buy into that rhetoric and don't challenge our liberal and progressive "best of the rest friends." I tell you those negros at the naacp and other "organizations" like it are truly a sad lot.

For clarification, a negro is an African who's been redesigned to fit the white man's image and has accepted that design. A black person is an African American who's trying to find his autonomy. An African in America is a black person who has attained a level of consciousness of self.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liberal and progressive whites Posted by: dwilliamsamh
» Superdumb at the Superdome Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Superdumb at the Superdome Posted by: Longdream
NAACP: AN AFRO/AMERICAN GROUP
Posted by: larry278 on Jul 22, 2006 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NAACP invited G W Bush to speak to them for 5 years. G W Bush accepted the invitation this year. The NAACP gave G W Bush a civil hearing, nothing more.
G W Bush's laundry list of GOP measures which he alleges benefit Americans, including people of color, left the NAACP audience unimpressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

god and blacks?
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 22, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the author takes a cheap shot at Bush right away by mentioning how many times Bush mentioned god to the NAACP.

1. so what?

2, how many times did other speakers mention God?

3. message to cyncial Mr. Palast: Blacks believe in God according to Pew polls more than any other ethnic group. As a "non-believer", I would respectfully suggest that a bit more cynicism about the order of the Universe and the non-existence of a universal justice principle might enhance black self-reliance, but that is for each individual to determine.
but Mr. Palast, God is not a dirty word. Even to a skeptic like me. Stop writing articles that assume everyone has your world view, wink wink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: god and blacks? Posted by: blackinjun
» RE: god and blacks? Posted by: coldeye
» RE: god and blacks? Posted by: blackinjun
» RE: god and blacks? Posted by: harris
» saving littledub Posted by: aurora2484
WE ARE ALL FROM AFRICA
Posted by: greentime on Jul 22, 2006 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our genetics show this. It is fact.

So... how do we get America over it's racist past and into a present where we acknowledge we all need each other?

1. If you are an American, white, and for that matter if you are black, latino, asian, or any other hyphenated American like italian-American, join the NAACP. If you are a native person join the NAACP. They stand for great things, they work hard to make a better world. They need your money. They are improving lives. Help them by joining and join without being intrusive. And yes, I am a member.

2. Stand up for everybody's civil rights.

3. Stand up for the earth. No planet = no people. Yes, it will end racism, but don't you think we can do this in more positve ways?

4. People are people. See everyone as a person.

Why is this important?

If everyone joined the NAACP, Bush would have to address all of us and tell us all the same thing. We would all be listening together. There would be an US again, and some real justice, not "just-us".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE ARE ALL FROM AFRICA Posted by: blackinjun
STOP Shrub the Charlatan, American Dictator
Posted by: HughEScott on Jul 22, 2006 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you believe as I do that George W. Bush is the most dangerous president in U.S. history, then for God's sake visit the website -- www.FreedomCentralUSA.com -- and tell your friends while we still have freedom of speech.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, Ronald Reagan fan and RABID necon-hater with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

please note the difference
Posted by: blackinjun on Jul 22, 2006 4:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
btw skin color and cultural efficacy/worldview...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I dislike Bush as much as the next person but....
Posted by: peritonlogon on Jul 23, 2006 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But this type of tongue and cheek

"His heart went out to the families of Gulf Coast flood victims who discovered that they could collect only the first two million bucks of their inheritance tax-free. Apparently, Mr. Bush heard that, among the 2,000 folk drowned in New Orleans, there were several millionaires. Luckily, the rumor proved false."

Is a bit offesive and uncharacteristic of an Alternet article. I understand exactly the intent of it, and included in the intent is an underlying joke at the expense of black people.

Let me simplify the joke if it's not already clear to everyone. I think the comment is exactly equivalent to this.

"(The [current] 'death tax' will prevent future African American entrepreneurs from being able to pass their assets from one generation to the next.) Right, because black people are all so rich they all need to protect their millions at the end of their long, long, lives. "

It goes beyond a joke about Bush not understanding his audience to a joke about how poor black people are.

Here's a more tasteful way of critiqueing the same thing. "Perhaps this audience is not as preoccupied with an inheritance tax as the President obviously is."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not nearly equivalent Posted by: Lincoln fan
Ah, another proud American moment.
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 23, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In New York, for example, a third of a million students qualify under the law to escape poorly performing schools -- but only 8,000 could do so. Mr. Bush forgot to include the money for the moves."

Who believes that Bush "forgot" to fund "No Middle or Upper Class Child Left Behind With 'Them' " rather than deliberately screwing the poorer, often darker skinned kids on purpose? Is that hard to see?

OK, then what does it say about the character of the American people that they by and large don't mind that fact? I'm assuming that the lack of any public reaction or outcry (apart from that of progressive activist organizations) is tacit consent and that they condone the bigotry and unfairness.

These really aren't kind or generous people here in America as they like to tell themselves often. They have twice chosen (or nearly chose) a mean spirited person to represent them. He has done nothing but lie and steal for 5-1/2 years, and still he still has a huge base of support, people that consider you and me America haters, wacko, and worse.

I see them as dangerous losers. I resent them for throwing away the republic, including our share of it, to obvious thugs for a handful of magic beans (no gay marriage, no abortion) without for a second considering the implications of being wrong. That of course is another reason that they are dangerous: they don't have enough sense to doubt whatever they are told. They are simple and certain, a sure sign of infantile and magical thinking. And DANGEROUS to coexist with, to share a nation with.

Consider this first post above:

"Bush's White House a whole lot darker than Clinton's but nobody cares. Posted by: thinkprogress
No President in history has elevated more minorities to positions of power than George W. Bush. But go back to bashing him. "


Why wouldn't you when every minority member that he has chosen is an Oreo, banana or coconut (figure it out if you're scratching your head - clue: all white on the inside, but not to look at)? Those people, like Clarence Thomas, are Judas goats, there to keep people that would represent those minorities out of those positions of authority while doing their masters' bidding. Who watches "Boondocks"? The most anti-African-American racist character on the show is also the blackest.

Please forgive my use of the "N" word, but no better phrase comes to mind when I see a Condoleeza Rice hoping to be accepted by the white community, and selling out her own to get there. No better description comes to mind for people like her and Thomas than "house nigger", the old slave term for the lucky slaves who got to be servants indoors rather than having to pick cotton with the field hands. They were expected to be loyal to the white family, not their own.

So, the ditto head hopes that this little talking point will soften us against Idiot Boy. How's it working? Anybody changing his or her mind with this tactic? LOL.

Multiply this by tens of millions, and you have the American ethos: dull, sluggish, simplistic, uncritical, morally compromised - am I wrong? Is this OK, or is this dangerous and unacceptable?

I recommend thinking about cashing out. There HAS to be cosmic consequences for stupid and mean spirited people. If this were a Bible story or a Shakespearian play, you can be sure that great misery would follow for such a people.

Question: What country is most likely to suffer a nuclear event next in one of its cities: (a) Iceland, (b) Ghana, (c) Bhutan or (d) the US?

Question: Citizens of which country are most like likely to become political prisoners or to be tortured by their own government: (a) New Zealand (b) Costa Rica (c) Canada (d) the US?

Just askin'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Get real Posted by: LMNOP
» time out, doc Posted by: aurora2484
» RE: time out, doc Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: time out, doc Posted by: aurora2484
» !!OY!! Posted by: aurora2484
» RE: !!OY!! Posted by: LMNOP
The negative space around Bush and the NAACP
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 23, 2006 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Negative space is a term from art schools - one way to learn to draw is to not look at the object you are drawing, but to look at everything else - then you draw that 'negative space' and lo, the object appears at the end.

So what did Bush not talk about - or rather, since Bush is just a talking head, what did his Karl Rove-guided speechwriting team not want to talk about?

Why didn't Bush praise the military service contribution of black soldiers? Well, that would have led into a discussion of 'international issues' and po black folk can't understand that- they just want grits and fried chicken, and since they are used to poverty, as Barbara Bush noted in the Superdome, well... I've run out of sarcasm. Where do these Bush people live? In some kind of artistical re-enactment of "Gone With The Wind"?

Why was there no mention of any international issues?

Hint: Martin Luther King was killed after he became concerned over the war in Vietnam - not because of his civil rights advocacy - and that's what the NAACP doesn't want to recognize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To read this stuff at the end of the day is funny as hell
Posted by: deo508 on Jul 23, 2006 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially the froth-at-the-mouth conservatives. It's easy to imagine themwith their hollowed out eyes with darkened rings around them scurrying like army ant on their keyboards spitting outlandish stuff into cyberspace - they ARE on a mission but who the hell knows what nthey are trying to do? So lost and lonely and lonely, they are. Wankers, every one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sick Repugnants
Posted by: deapp on Jul 24, 2006 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Understand this, Blacks concerns are not about how many blacks are in the white house. Clinton put far more Blacks in the white house in various positions than any other President in history. Clinton failed to put as many in higher positions. He admits that mistake. Bush put token Blacks in positions that represent Whites not Blacks. Condi is the only token left. Blacks are concern about Poor people and those that are raped then pushed aside. Blacks or Black leadership seek help and rights for Blacks, poor and disadvantage Whites will benefit as well and first most of the time. Blacks can't obtain anything with out helping Whites but Whites can benefit from a Bush government without Blacks. The NAACP has been around for a long time. Most of the ones that showed up for the speech were of a higher income than most people. Many Whites who are members of the NAACP were there to. After all a White woman was the founder of the NAACP. Now, that's something the racist Repugnants will have a hard time swallowing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing Can Come From Nothing
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jul 24, 2006 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NAACP members were disappointed with the President's remarks during his speech, but they should have expected it. His attempt to build a bridge to the organization failed.
There was a big difference between addressing the NAACP and a faith-based group where Bush is more comfortable. If anyone is ill at ease from speaking to a (hostile) crowd they will be uncomfortable.
To quote a line from King Lear-"Nothing can come from nothing." Nothing was accomplished.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is he a racist?
Posted by: Longdream on Jul 29, 2006 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's certainly put african-american and Latino people in positions of power in his administration.

And that's really important. It's vital for American children of color to see faces like their own in high levels of government.

Notice I said American children. I think african-american adults know the difference between Condi Rice's color and their own. I don't think Condi, herself, is window dressing (I prefer that term to some of the others thrown around the column), but I do think this particular administration likes to have a nice color mix onscreen. I say that because sometimes it seems color or name seems to be a person's chief qualification. (In the case of Alberto Gonzales, maybe it was that snap-shit willingness to tailor-make the case. It surely wasn't his skill as a lawyer or judge.)

Now, that doesn't necessarily make such a bad case. I'd rather see diversity than not, no matter the reason. The thing is, conscious promotion of racial equality and harmony can't end there. I'd believe the resolve went through to their hearts if there had not been a near-systematic dismantling of programs for the poor, poor children especially. I'd believe it if Bush didn't go out of his way to misrepresent and assault affirmative action.

Doesn't anyone find it significant that Bush has snubbed the NAACP convention for five years running, and is addressing the members this year for the first time in his presidency? I don't have any statistics, but I'll bet money that not many presidents have done that. Could it be his handlers want to throw a little body english on african-americans after the Katrina tragedy?

Is he personally racist? Probably not. He's supposed to be pretty nice, if you like the nick-naming, brash, pugnacious type, and aggressive humor. I don't think he has anything against gay people, either, and I don't think he gives a crap whether they marry or not.

Is it racist when personal and political expediency to get and keep power comes before everything else, even at the expense of the civil rights of the least powerful in the country?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
tr
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
t
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
f
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
duy
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
r
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
f
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dart
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
df
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fik
Posted by: davemirol on Oct 26, 2006 12:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement