Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A Racist Slur at the World Cup?

By Dave Zirin, AlterNet. Posted July 11, 2006.


Behind the stunning ejection of France's star player during overtime in the World Cup finals are allegations of racism on the part of an Italian player.
worldcup_full
A Racist Slur at the World Cup?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Dave Zirin

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Imagine Michael Jordan in his last game, with the score tied in overtime, knocking out his defender with a punch to the throat. Imagine Derek Jeter in game seven of the World Series, at bat with the bases loaded, thrashing the opposing team's catcher over the head with his bat. Our collective shock would only be exceeded by disappointment. No one, fan or foe, would want to a see a great player end their career in an act that speaks to the worst impulses of sports: when hard competition spills over into violence.

Now imagine if Jordan and Jeter claimed they were provoked with a racial slur. Does their violence become understandable? Even excusable? Herein lies the case of French National team captain, the great Zinedine Zidane. Zidane, competing in his last professional match, was kicked out of the World Cup final in overtime for flattening Italian player Marco Materazzi with the head-butt heard around the world. Zidane, or Zissou as he is known, became the first captain ever ejected from a World Cup championship match.

The announcers denounced Zissou for committing a "classless act and the French team withered, eventually losing to a demonstrably inferior Italian squad in overtime. The following morning the international tabloids with their typical grace, gave Zissou a new nickname: "butt-head." Less examined was the fact that Zissou was literally carrying a lightly regarded French team to the finals. Less examined was the fact that Zissou had been grabbed, kicked, and fouled all game by the vaunted Italian defense. Less examined was the fact that Zissou had almost left minutes earlier due to injury, his arm wilting off his shoulder like a wet leaf of spinach. This unholy amount of pressure is the primary reason the 34-year-old veteran snapped and planted Materazzi into the pitch.

Now the great mystery is what set Zissou off. What could Materazzi have possibly said to send him over the edge? Answers are beginning to filter out. According to a FIFA employee transcribing what was said during the match, Materazzi's called Zissou a "big Algerian shit." A Brazilian television program that claims to have used a lip-reader said Materazzi called Zissou's sister "a whore." The highly respected French anti-racist coalition SOS Racisme issued a press release stating, "According to several very well informed sources from the world of football, it would seem [Materazzi] called Zissou a 'dirty terrorist'."

Materazzi, in an answer that can only be called Clintonian, said, "It is absolutely not true. I didn't call him a terrorist." Of course he didn‚t comment on what he did call him. Zissou himself has only said cryptically that he would reveal what Materazzi said "in the coming days."

Right now, we do not know beyond a shadow of a doubt what was said but all the circumstantial evidence points at least toward a variant of SOS Racisme's claim. Zissou is the son of Algerian immigrants who has sparred verbally with Europe's far-right political machine for more than a decade. He is an outspoken anti-racist on a team that has defined itself by its multiculturalism and stubborn insistence to stand up against bigotry both inside and outside the sport. Materazzi on the other hand, will be playing this year for the Italian team Lazio, where his father was the former coach. Lazio's fan club, The Ultras, are notorious for their Fascist-friendly politics. Lazio's hardcore Ultras, known as the "Irriducibili," have members in Italy's extra-parliamentary far right and try to use the club to recruit. The group has frequently uses racist and anti-Semitic banners, one time hanging a 50-foot banner that said their opponents were a "team of niggers."

It's wrong to taint Materazzi for the actions of Lazio's fans, but there is more. Earlier this season in a match that pitted Messina against Inter in Sicily, Messina's star African player Marc Zoro famously picked up the ball and walked off the pitch in protest of the monkey chants rained upon him by Inter supporters. In a stirring act of solidarity, many of the Inter players immediately showed support for Zoro's actions. But one opponent yelled, "Stop that, Zoro, you're just trying to make a name for yourself." That opponent's name was Marco Materazzi.

At the start of this tournament I wrote a soccer column with my colleague John Cox, called "Racism Stalks the Cup." We expressed our concern that the monkey chants, banana peels, and peanuts raining down on African players this year would continue on the sport's grandest stage. This largely did not occur. But then in the final act, at the moment of most exquisite tension, it seems racism may have actually emerged from the shadows. I, for one, am damn glad that when it did, it ran smack into Zissou's beautiful head.

We don't know with iron certainty what Materazzi said, but if it turns out to be more of the anti-Black, anti-Muslim, garbage that has infected soccer like a virus, the Italian team should forfeit the cup. They should voluntarily give the greatest trophy of them all back to FIFA as a statement that some things in this world are more important than sports. Racism will be the death of soccer if things don't change. Italy can set the sport back on course, with one simple, stunning gesture. Give the damn thing back.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Dave Zirin is the author of "What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States." Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Racism is everywhere in sport
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US baseball scouts grab the best players from Latin America (who are infinitely cheaper than US players, especially since they don't have managers to look after them), then they play games in wealthy places like Japan.

Buy cheap, sell to the wealthy.

Make Big Profits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From another Blog (www.theage.com.au)
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Reading this blog and the french blogs over here in france (by the way all the french disapprove his act), it goes back to all the same. We want to live in a perfect world, with perfect people, in perfect houses driving perfect jobs and marying the perfect partner. How steril and boaring. Life is not perfect, thank....zidane.
Also zidane is going to speek in a few days on french tv, so let's wait. I'd be surprised if he says anything. He also lost his "mentor", his first coach died of cancer during this world cup and his mum got really sick as well. He was ringing her every day and saying how much he loved her on tv. And rumors say that the other guy insulted his mother, knowing the actual circumstances. We will never know and by the way isn't a villain a bit of a heroe or isn't a heroe a bit of a villain?
Last thing, italy lost in quater final in 98, not semi, and how funny that even when they lost they always deserved to win!! Soccer players are completly rotten and have the worst mentallity. I played the game and stopped because of this but still love watching it.

Posted by: chris at July 11, 2006 04:33 PM "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a sports fan
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Jul 11, 2006 3:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it was a shock. For sure, in the replays, watch the action preceding the 'head butt.' I think the media has sufficient machinery in its video department to focus in on the Italian player's mouth and enough resources to do the necessary lip reading, and enough courage to print the resulting findings. Of course such actions are well known and universal on the field of battle, especially by the less than talented who must rely on such tactics. Equally unfortunate is that such cheap tricks are seen as being part of the tactics of 'war' on the field. That Zidane was beyond being vulnerable due to his personal life losses and for someone to have used that knowledge to lay into him with a vicious taunt of the sort that is being suggested, does indeed tarnish the shine on the cup that Italy has won with a free kick that Zidane could not match due to his ejection. If indeed the taunts prove to be true, then action must be taken. Red carding at that time in a World Cup final is serious. Of course, had the referee been privvy to the taunt, then the Italian would have had to have been red carded. If the truth is learned in retrospect, then the penalty must follow. A one year ban from soccer must be given in order to maintain the integrity of the sport. Zidane has already paid for his retributive action. Now the other perp must pay his due. And what's this about a 50 foot sign with such words being allowed in public? Are there no anti racist laws in Italy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm missing something. Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: I'm missing something. Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: I'm missing something. Posted by: disgustedandamused
more refs
Posted by: aislinnluv on Jul 11, 2006 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what if there were more referees on the pitch during games? could they not perhaps observe verbal assaults as well as physical ones and deal out yellow (or red) cards for these offenses? certainly more real fouls of the physical type would be caught, and that might in itself be a boon. that such a large playing field is under the jurisdiction of but one official seems absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more refs Posted by: harris
» RE: more refs Posted by: andrewgirma
I doubt it (plus some nonsense)
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 11, 2006 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"the Italian team should forfeit the cup. They should voluntarily give the ... trophy ... back ... as a statement that some things in this world are more important than sports."

If by they, the author means the Italian team rather than the officials, he might as well suggest that they sprout wings and fly. They're racists. That means they don't suddenly regret their racist actions and do the right thing. What a strange comment, assuming I understand it correctly

Now for a semantic quibble:

"Zissou was literally carrying a lightly regarded French team to the finals."

What this means is that the team arrived at the finals that day carried in Zissou's arms, probably one at a time. I doubt that. The sentence is fine if you drop the word literally or replace it with the word 'figuratively', literally's opposite.

I hear things like this at least weekly: "He was literally bouncing off the walls." Unless he was with an acrobatic troupe like Circe de Soleil or the Blue Man Group, that seems unlikely.

If I may be indulged just a little longer in this off-topic and relatively unimportant but interesting and fun subject of semantic errors, I'll point out two more very common logical errors in colloquial speech;

"We carry all brands from Maytag to Frigidaire to G.E."

When you use the "from...to..." construction, you imply a gamut or range, which, if complete, should be of the form "from (beginning) to (end)" such as "from A to Z", or "from the dawn of time until present day" or "from soup to nuts" (assuming soup implies the first bite of the meal and the nuts are last) or "from Genesis to Revelations" or "from head to toe" or "from cradle to grave". You get it.

The Maytag example not only violates the spirit of this type of construction by naming random elements of an assortment rather than its extremes or limits, but it compounds it by using the word 'to' more than once: "from ... to ... to ...to ...".
No biggie, but if you do this, you may want to modify it to be more logically tenable. I remember a television ad that said, "We carry all brands from Admiral to Zenith". That's the spirit!

"The tortoise was about ten times slower than the hare"
"The children's pool was twice as shallow as ours"
"Although still a drought, with double the rainfall this season compared to last, the river was only half as low as last year."

These all share the same logical error. Take a look at it if for moment if you can't immediately see why. If still no success, consider these revisions and why they are better:

"The tortoise was about one tenth as fast as the hare"
"The children's pool was half as deep as ours"
"Although still a drought, with double the rainfall this season compared to last, the river was twice as high as last year."

Or these could be worded:

"The tortoise was considerably slower than the hare"
"The children's pool was shallower than ours"
"Although still a drought, with double the rainfall this season compared to last, the river low, but not as low as last year."

You can’t be twice as broke, just half as rich. You can't be twice as skinny, just half as fat.

Admittedly, this stuff is a bit picky, but some of us enjoy thinking about it and some want to avoid SOLECISMS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are U sure? Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Are U sure? Posted by: LMNOP
» NOT nonsense at all Posted by: fifthworld
» One more contradiction Posted by: YogiBear
Come on
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Jul 11, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand the racism issue in soccer. But trash-talking is as big a part of soccer as it is in football or basketball, or even baseball in the US. This isn't golf. Part of the competition is the mental aspect of the game. Zidane should have known where he was and what the consequences were, no matter what was said. I've had people say some absoultely ridiculous things to me - during pickup basketball. Maybe he said something racist, maybe something about his mother or sister or God or whatever. Maybe Zidane had a good reason to head-butt the guy. But the best way to pay him back for his comments would have been to score a goal and win the World Cup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It wasn't the women's team....
Posted by: cdtomei on Jul 11, 2006 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've watched players get carded for foul language, as they should be. It happens on women's teams, too. The funny thing about the French-Italian debacle is how a man let his thin skin ruin it for his team.
Maybe the Italian didn't get carded when he should have, that happens a lot, but a bad call or a failure to call on the part of the ref doesn't give anyone the right to assault someone during a World Cup. That was the stupidest mistake the Frenchman could make, and he allowed himself to make it.
When the very best players are facing off against the other very best players, it's often not who plays better that wins the game, but who makes more mistakes. Forcing a mistake on the other side is a common strategy. You don't rise to the bait, though, and you can still win. The opposite happens more often.
The Brazil-US womens soccer Olympic championship was pretty dirty and had a lot of nasty moments, too, and no doubt, some people didn't get carded when they might have. But there was no fighting on the field. Maybe women are winning in the soccer world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No pride....
Posted by: Zemiti on Jul 11, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time when sport was meant to be enjoyable and thrilling to watch. THe whole Zidane incident is regretable, more so as it is slowly emerging that he may have been subjected to racial abuse. This is rife in Italian soccer, some of us have seen and heard these awful barbaric acts. That it came out on the occasion of such a spectacle is disgraceful; in my view the Italians do not deserve this trophy. Their football did not light the fire at this great stage, they beat Australia on the back of contriving a foul; in short they cheated! Couple that with the scandal currently rocking Italian soccer, one can see where their antics and mindset come from. They ruined a grand occasion, they are spoilers; they do not deserve the accolade of being champions of the world as they do not embody the ethos and values of what being true champions symbolises. Pah! to them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No pride.... Posted by: harris
» RE: No pride.... Posted by: rg
You guys just don't get it?
Posted by: farhada on Jul 11, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, you can not compare Zidane with Baseball or Basketball players. Do you real understand the difference between them (probably not, because you would not have written this POS otherwise).

Zidane is and does not have a history of violence, not like many other players with bad temper.

What happened on Sunday in Germany, is a sad over reaction of a legend, a man who took up the French team from a sad state into the glory of the world cup final.

But for the French, it was not enough, the have short memory, they forgot the joke that was going around in Paris about the team, when they played Togo. They were saying at 9pm it is Togo-France and at 11pm will Goto-France, Zidane, Henry, Viery and others proved them wrong.

Zidane is and will always be one of the best players in the history, one who took France to 2 world cup finals and won one of them.

Materazzi is a pig, he has always been a pig, Zidane should have know about it, but with so much pressure on his shoulder, his sick mother and the eyes of a nation on him, he just needed on push to break, and that was what Materazzi did, he touched a nerve that was sensitive. We all have one, we all break some times, specially under pressure, so give the man a break.

People who judge him for that incident should put themselves in his position, think for a second and lets see what you would do?

Zidane will go into history, side by side with Pele, Johann Johan Cruyff, Platini, Eusebio, Macro Van Basten, Bobby Charlton and Maradona. But he will be above many of them, for his technique and leadership not for one stupid moment of bad judgment.

I had tears in my eyes when I saw him walk off the plan, it is sad to see the giants fall, specially such great ones like Zidane, I can not accept his reaction, but I do respect him like I did before, he is a great football player and a nice man,

/Farhad Abdolian

/Farhad

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Violence in sports
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 11, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does this compare to basketball players running into stands after being taunted, having things thrown at them etc.. Their reaction is understandable but, in the position they are in they should know better... to be a top sports figure doesn’t only mean to be a great athlete, it demands character on and off the field. This is an unfortunate situation but is part of the game. Italy played their card in this case and won. Ever watcha boxing match closely and see the trash talking that goes on “inside”. It can make or break an opponent and in this case it broke an opponent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pick your fights folks
Posted by: g on Jul 11, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, this is at least the third time that Zidane commits acts of violence during a game. Once he stomped on a player from the Saudi Arabia team. But maybe that player had called Zidane a terrorist too? Or maybe an invisible Matarazzo was pestering him? As for Zidane's injuries, again, soccer ain't tennis. Matarazzo did what he had to do to stop Zidane successfully. That may well have set off Zidane. By the way, why is it that when Italian players get injured they are accused of doing "theatricals" while we should feel sorry for Zidane?
Secondly, the Guardian published this unsupported assertion and then withdrew it. They are the ones that should apologize, not the Italian team. In these times, the last thing we need are inflammatory trumped up accusations. We have the Bush administration for that. Why should Italy give up a cup that they well deserved to win (of course the French and Zirin will disagree, but that's another story) because someone decided to publish a juicy bit forgetting that thing called "fact checking"?
Thirdly, this is soccer. you may not like it, but slurs and name calling fly all over the place all the time. Have we forgotten the article in Der Spiegel calling Italian men "mama's boy" and so on and so forth? I didn't see Mr. Zidin getting his panties in a bunch over that, or about the Germans booing during the Italian anthem. As for the team being "demonstrably inferior," someone please show me that demonstration.
I am pretty sure Mararazzo said something he should be ashamed of. He may as well have called Zidane's sister a whore, as the Brazilian TV Globo claims. But every player got their sister, mother, wife, or other female relative called a whore, regardless of race. It should not be, but it happens all the time, so either it becomes penalized for everyone, or we get over it (or we stop watching soccer) The relevant difference is that Zidane reacted with violence, and he is famous for this (as Zirin conveniently forgets).
By the way, it's Zizou, not Zissou. Zissou (Life aquatique of Steve Zissou) was a movie with Bill Murray. This was also not hard to double check (which says something about Mr. Zirin's ability as a journalist). I undestand Mr. Zirin may still be sore at Italy for beating the US, but that's life. Or he may be disappointed that the feared racist chants against African players did not occur (using slurs against white Italian players does not count for Zirin). Racism is an ugly beast. People who cry racism where there's only stupidity (a lot of it) do no one a favor. Pick your fights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This was not the first time
Posted by: mdwoade on Jul 11, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1998 World Cup, which France won, Zidane missed several games because he spiked a Saudi player. He said that it was the pressure that got to him. He has been thrown out of numerous games because of violent acts against his opponents. If you look at what happened, you will see that Zidane walked past Marco Materazzi, turned around, and purposely walked toward him before head-butting him. It is obvious that he thought about this act for several seconds before he acted. This was not an instant reaction in the heat of an argument. This was a thuggish act, by someone who should have know better, regardless of provocation.
Granted, Zidane grew up in a tough neighborhood, and he had to fight to get where he was. He certainly has put up with a lot. Even his greatest supporters must be at a loss for why he decided to knock down his opponent ten minutes before the end of the last competitive soccer game in which he will probably ever play, in front of millions of fans, across the world. For those who consider this a noble act, do they consider violence to be acceptable, and is this a shining example to hold up before our children? If Zidane had kept walking and France had won, would we be bemoaning the fact that he was a sissy who refused to assault another player? Should we reward stupidity and violence, or should we expect our role models to be held to a higher standard? In the end, Zidane's stunning career will stand out as his legacy, I just think that putting a positive spin on this incident is not the way to go; violence after insult is wrong. I think we need to recognize that there are two completely issues: there is racism in soccer, and what Zidane did is not excusable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Cares?
Posted by: sirossisofliver on Jul 11, 2006 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a sports aficianado, so this is not something I really care about.

But I have to be amazed at the reaction to this incident. I have had the extreme displeasure of attending an American Hockey Game. I witnessed a veritable orgy of concerted violence and brutality. It was thoroughly disgusting....primarily because it was acceptable (as part of the game).

I can't understand the "outrage" here. This was a single incident in almost a month of otherwise uplifting sporting international play.

Get Over it

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Cares? Posted by: farhada
» RE: Who Cares? Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: Who Cares? Posted by: farhada
» RE: Who Cares? Posted by: hms2004
What?
Posted by: harris on Jul 11, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of the alleged insults in this article are really racist. Algerian is a nationality, not a race. Terrorists come in all colors; and "your sister is a whore" is racist? Give us a break.
Also - hello!? Muslim isn't a race, its a religion.
The author probably never played soccer, at least not past the little league level.
If you wanted to deal with racism at the world cup, you should have written about the well documented assaults (verbal and physical) on Africans.
When I read this article, I felt like the author was stretching real hard to make a case. Yeah, Matazarri is an a**hole, but so is Zidane for resorting to violence. How do you know that Zidane didn't say something racist to Matazarri? He does have a history of violence on the pitch.
A couple people said Italy should give the cup back because they're racists. So one player allegedly saying racist things means the whole team are worthless racists?
This reminds me of that other cheesy soccer article "world war on the soccer field" or something like that. Search under "soccer" on this site and you'll see it. A different author basically says the Germans are still Nazis and they play industralized ugly soccer; and of course the Brazilians are perfect saints.
I'm American, but I spent about half of my childhood in Germany. When I came back and played soccer in the southwest, where about 80% of the players are latino, Guess what? I was the recipient of this type of "racism" I was called a nazi and worse. I wasn't even given a chance to earn respect and prove myself except by a handful of really cool teammates, latino and white. You know what? I never hit anyone, even as a hormone drenched teenager.
Someone also called Italy a "white" team. Maybe for the next world cup every "white" team should be given antiracism tests to see if they are worthy to play?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What? Posted by: rg
» good one! Posted by: harris
Great Example of Why You don't take the "bait".
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 11, 2006 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assumed that Zedane reacted to some insult when I saw him hit the Italian. I mean he hadn't been going around game after game doing that. Having said that, Zedane should have kept his cool given the well-known racial slurs and other insults that soccer players throw at each other.

The incident happened at a point in the game where it should have been obvious to a vet like Zedane that the Italians might try any devious stunt to get him out of the game. And they did.

Lesson: Kids, don't be race-baited out of a game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a Racist article!
Posted by: acooper on Jul 11, 2006 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Calling someone's sister a whore is not a racist insult, but assuming that for persons of a particular ethnicity such verbal insults inevitably provoke excusable violence is one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A FRENCHMAN made a racist remark???
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 11, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... what a frickin' shock.

Anyone remember the riots a few months ago? Anyone? Heellooo??? Is this thing on???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try watching a game before criticizing it
Posted by: Lunasol on Jul 11, 2006 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For heaven's sake, tripping, shoving, elbowing, punching and shirt-grabbing and trash talking are part of the game. This is how the game is played on the pitch, and it's only a foul or a card if the ref sees it. That's the game. If a player doesn't know how to keep his cool under those conditions or how to get back at the other guy without the ref seeing it by the time he reaches international level, then he deserves every booking he gets.

I actually saw the game and saw the head-butting when it happened, and it was obvious there was shit going on back and forth between them. If Materazzi made a slur of any kind, then FIFA can and would probably fine him over it and possibly suspend him from international play, and he'll go down in the books as a racist ass. That said, I'm good with the booking Zizou got because no matter what Materazzi said, it's still no justification for physical violence. A punch (or a head-butt, since it's fútbol and no hands are allowed!) is never an answer to any word. The red card was justified, and it really doesn't hurt him, other than maybe being a reason France lost, but who the hell knows anyway, because he's retiring and he won the Golden Ball anyway. I agree that Materazzi should have been booked as well, but like all things in fútbol, if the ref didn't see/hear it, it didn't happen. Zidane's mistake was in busting Materazzi's chops out in the open instead of with the game. I'm pretty sure France winning would have stung Materazzi a lot more than a bonk to the sternum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

really off track !
Posted by: kdemata on Jul 11, 2006 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we are going a bit off track here and frankly I am not sure what is the point and aim of this article.

While there's no doubt that some of the European soccer fans portrays generic right-wing imagery (and have been know for racial slogans - Lazio supporters being the most vocal about their right wing 'ideologies'), the vast majority of supporters are frankly not keen on confusing they club loyalty to their political belief. Others supporters are also happy to rally under Che Guevara flags. Livorno's supporters for example are well known for their self proclaimed 'extreme-left' ideologies.


But while in lazio case they give voice to ugly and offensive slogans, in Livorno's case they lead to entertaining and cunning protests against Milan President (and Italian Ex-Prime minister Silvio Berlusconi).

So it is not really fair (nor logically sound) to take one group of supporters or one club (or even one player) to make a case-point out of it.

In general the soccer world is slighly different from the real world, and while racist comments or acts should not be tolerated at all, most of what is said on the pitch (and there's a vast array of colourful insults and profanities, espacially in Italian) should be put in context and most time will resolve with a hand shake and a pat on the shoulder by the end of the match.

As for the specific players it is quite interesting to cite the entire Materazzi's statement following the incindent in the world cup final. The player in fact has denied calling Zidane a terrorist stating with candor: "I did not call him a terrorist. I am not a cultured person and I don't even know what as Islamist terrorist is."

I think actually this speaks volumes about soccer. Most of the players come from lower class and low education sections of society (Zidane is actually a great example) where playing soccer is still seen as a possible way out of the slums and the streets of suburban Europe where violence and thuggery could be an easy alternative. And here maybe lies a reediming factor for this sport.

I am afraid we are off focus here. The problem with soccer is not so much the insults on pitch, but the attack from corporate curruptions and sponsors-biased decisions on a world that is by definition not populated by intellectuals, and it is proud of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: really off track ! Posted by: jamoze
Just give them guns
Posted by: ghoster on Jul 11, 2006 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just arm them so that we can be sure that the insults would stop. Stupid game played by stupid people and watched by even dumber ones

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I wonder Posted by: harris
» RE: Just give them guns Posted by: YogiBear
Forfeit the cup?
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Jul 11, 2006 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to admit that I have always had the feeling that the Italians (at least the soccer team) were always a bit more trashy and slimy than most. And that is why the Italians (again, the soccer outfits) have always been at the bottom of my list when it comes to favourites. So these reports don't surprise me. As for forfeiting the cup or maybe even a rematch, I'm open to the suggestion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Forfeit the cup? Posted by: sidewinder
» RE: Forfeit the cup? Posted by: harris
» RE: Forfeit the cup? Posted by: Rod from Canada
Shades of WMD arguments here!
Posted by: bert69 on Jul 11, 2006 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you serious, Mr Kirin? Are you really serious? Not since Powell's U.N. speech have I read such dubious "intelligence". ' FIFA employee transcribing what was said during the match ' -just one, faithfully transcribing the obiter dicta of 22 sweating cursing high-intensity athletes at the one time? I suppose Mr Kirin believes in the mobile chemical factory and Bin Laden's three storey cave in Tora Bora.
If an author is presenting a case it behooves him not to prejudge the issue by piling up soooooo much evidence unilaterally (e.g. we would not know from this article anything about Zidane's previous conduct; the assumption then since the article is about discipline is that it was impeccable.)
Very unbalanced piece, no credit to Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism, lose Cup?
Posted by: Reader11722 on Jul 11, 2006 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, no one even knows if it was a racist remark. Second, free speech is free speech. What's next, we ban all free speech? Oddly enough it's already happening in Germany (home of World Cup 2006) via the trial of Ernst Zundel. It's also happening in America by caging peaceful protestors and forcing book outlets to drop the book "America Deceived" by E.A Blayre III. Soon, everyone will clamour for gov't to arrest anyone who says something that offends anyone else. Sounds like Stalin's Russia.
Anyway, Congrats Italy on deserving the Cup.
Last link (before Google Books is censored):
http://www.iuniverse.com/
bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Viva Italia!
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 11, 2006 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, someone's gotta take their side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor journalism, no knowledge of football
Posted by: RuffianMilan on Jul 11, 2006 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Zidane's nickname is Zizou, not Zissou. A basic knowledge of football or rudimentary fact-checking would have caught this.

2. "This unholy amount of pressure is the primary reason the 34-year-old veteran snapped and planted Materazzi into the pitch." How do you know why he snapped? Zidane hasn't talked and his teammates have said they don't know. Are you a mind-reader now?

3. "According to a FIFA employee transcribing what was said during the match" Source please. I've never heard of match transcripts!

4. "big Algerian shit... [sister] a whore... dirty terrorist" Well, which one was it? Can we read the transcript (heh) please? Vulgar yes, but racist? I'm not that sure. And Materazzi has denied calling him a "terrorist."

6. "Right now, we do not know beyond a shadow of a doubt what was said but all the circumstantial evidence points at least toward a variant of SOS Racisme's claim." The first part of your sentence is right, the second is your opinion. My opinion is that Materazzi said something extremely vulgar.

7. "Materazzi on the other hand, will be playing this year for the Italian team Lazio..." Source please. As far as I know, Materazzi is still an Inter player. Why would he leave Inter for a club that risks relegation and is in financial difficulties? Why would Inter want to get rid of a World Cup winner?

9. "It's wrong to taint Materazzi for the actions of Lazio's fans, but there is more." After the insinuations, the simpering denial. Lazio has had black players; are they automatically tainted too? And the Lazio Ultras has said much worse than what you mentioned.

10. "In a stirring act of solidarity, many of the Inter players immediately showed support for Zoro's actions. But one opponent yelled, "Stop that, Zoro, you're just trying to make a name for yourself." That opponent's name was Marco Materazzi." Source please. I follow Serie A and never heard of this. I did see two of Inter's black players trying to persuade Zoro to keep on playing. My source for what they were doing? Some of Zoro's interviews after the match. He wasn't happy that they didn't support him, but he was polite about it.

11. "We don't know with iron certainty what Materazzi said" Right. Why don't you wait until Zidane says something instead of implying and insinuating? And why isn't he saying anything now?

12. Zidane has been sent off 12 times in 14 years. He was suspended in this World Cup for picking up a card in each of the first two matches. He was sent off in the 1998 World Cup for stamping on a (black) Saudi Arabian player. He was sent off and served a long suspension in 2000 for headbutting a German player who tackled him from behind in a Champions League game. Is Zizou an anti-Arab, anti-black, anti-European, anti-Christian racist? Or is he just a great player with a temper?

13. I'm a Milan supporter, and I'm not happy that you're forcing me to defend Materazzi. He's a filthy player with a long history of trash-talking and severe fouling, but he has no history of racism. You sound ready to send him to Guantanamo on the basis of hearsay, faulty information and your lurid imagination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're Kidding!?
Posted by: dbonney on Jul 11, 2006 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an incredible piece of verbal flatulence. A Brazilian lip reader cited as a source of what words might have passed between the two players? Thanks for the laugh, but even an opinion piece needs to have some factual underpinning. There's nothing of the sort here; it's merely one unsupported innuendo after another. That adds up to a whole lot of nothing. Although the writer expresses concern about racial slurs, his sincerity is called into serious question by his proclivity to wear a decidedly anti-Italian bias on his sleeve. Now there's something that hangs like a "wet leaf of spinach."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look on the funny side
Posted by: shadiahm on Jul 11, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel people are undervaluing the comedy aspect to this.

Zidane's headbutt was the highlight of a pretty disappointing World Cup and judging from the number of times the incident has been viewed on YouTube others feels so too.

Football is popular theatre. Okay, the headbutt must have hurt, but unlike street violence no-one ends up killed or maimed by these types of incidents.

When Man United's Eric Cantona Kung Fu-kicked a supporter who had hurled zenophobic abuse at him a few years back people's initial shock was soon replaced with some amusment.

The fan in question had a crimal record for attacking someone with an iron bar, and the look of horror on his face when he realised Cantona wasn't going to put up with his shit was priceless.

Likewise Materazzi. He was out of order, Zidane issued his retribution and anything else is down to the football authorities to deal with.

Plus, I'd like to see Zidane try that with Peter Crouch. Now that would be funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zidane failed his team. The Italians won. Get over it.
Posted by: iuomo on Jul 12, 2006 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gimme a break.

No one is innocent.

You're a sore loser.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor journalism
Posted by: jamoze on Jul 12, 2006 2:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can the journalist get his facts so wrong? It's not "Zissou" it's "Zizou" and Materazzi does NOT play for Lazio, he never has. He in fact plays for Inter Milan. I always find it so amusing to read American commentry about the World's most popular sport, it's always inviariably badly written and riddled with errors. If I was writing a piece about the Superbowl or the World Series I would ensure my facts are correct before I passed any comment. I am not a fan of American sports but I would at least ensure I did my job properly by bothering to check my facts first, I find it incredibly poor that this journalist was too lazy to check these facts first.

As for Zidane's headbutt, he lost his temper at a time of immense psychological pressure. He has a history of violence on the field and although Materazzi is a trouble causer I find it too easy to simply dismiss it as racism. At Inter Milan (not Lazio!) his closest friend is Obafami Martins who happens to be from Nigeria. If it was indeed a racist comment that set Zidane off I would be very surprised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kurt
Posted by: austin on Jul 12, 2006 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's hope Zidane is classy enough to tell his fans, especially the young ones, that what he did was wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Infamous Head Butt
Posted by: Marco on Jul 12, 2006 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Italians giving up pasta is as likely as The Azzurri giving up the Cup. Zindane has heard it all. Maybe he was under pressure due to his mentor's death and his mother's illness. The Italians did everything to win the Cup. They played dirty and took dives. Name me teams that don't ever ever engage in either. This is soccer. The French and Italians know this and wouldn't bother to write about these things. It's part of the game and part of the culture. Americans should be more concerned about New Orleans than a head butt and fowl language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Son of a terrorist whore
Posted by: Lefty Fukwitz on Jul 12, 2006 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to some reports lip readers reviewing the tape say this was the insult. Big deal. Who really cares what a bunch of soccer playing sissies call each other on or off the field?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now what?
Posted by: g on Jul 12, 2006 9:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Turns out that the "reliable" sources of SOS Racisme were full of shit, according to Zidane himself. Apparently, Materazzi insulted "his" women. I will not believe for a moment that in a long and successful career as a soccer player Zidane never heard "his" women insulted, but somehow this time he made this big mistake, and he paid for it. Rightly. Now let us all move on to serious things and forget this sad episode of stupidity (Materazzi, Zidane, and Zidane's mom telling the press that Materazzi should be castrated), lack of sportsmanship (the French sore losers), and poor journalism (Dave Zirin).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Sexist Slur at the World Cup?
Posted by: RuffianMilan on Jul 13, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't Zirin writing the above story? Does he only get upset when Arab, Muslim or black men are insulted? Don't Berber or French women matter in his universe? Why isn't he calling on all teams who have made sexist remarks on the playing field to give up everything they've won? Is he a sexist himself, as well as being a poor journalist and a football ignoramus?

Moral of the story: There wasn't a story. Zirin made it all up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The larger question
Posted by: boygranddakar on Jul 13, 2006 6:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People often strike out physically when they are at a loss for words. I suspect this was the case with Zidane. Assuming Materazzi did insult Zidane's mother and sister, Zidane could have responded in kind... but perhaps his own sense of honor and fair play prevented him from doing so. He said himself that he would prefer to take a blow than listen to such insults.

While winding up the opposition happens in every sport, I think boundaries need to be drawn. Racism is a huge issue for international football, and even if Materazzi did not use racist terms against Zidane, FIFA should consider making rules about it now. The kind of taunting meted out to African players is unconscienceable. If a white player called Michael Jordan "nigger" repeatedly (and not in a friendly, "he's my nigga," kind of way) that player would no doubt face severe reprimand. Such racism should never be acceptable, on or off the pitch.

Likewise sexist baiting such as insulting a player's female relatives should be out of bounds.

Let players exercise their creativity by thinking up alternative ways to disparage an opponent's ability. Sportsmanship means restraining yourself under pressure. Why should we expect players to retain control of their fists (or heads), but not their tongues?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zidane is not a victim
Posted by: evanjc on Jul 13, 2006 8:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zidane was not the victim in this incident. He has a history of actions like this, he stomped on a Saudi player in the 1998 cup and he headbutted a player during his days at Juventis. I feel he is largely being given a pass becuase he has been such a quality player. In addition, this article vilified the Italian team, but it should be mentioned that there a number of derogatory things said about the Azzuri in the German media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Zidane is not a victim Posted by: para-dice
Classic NS (nice shot) Zidane
Posted by: para-dice on Jul 14, 2006 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was classic shot and manly. Don't know if your ejection made any difference in the finals, but it was truly a CLASSIC way to go out. Truly a unfogettable way to say good bye to football. :)

It was good to see, in this stifling politicaly correct world, something that reminds us of rogue masqulinity.

I approve of you hit the taunting "spic" back. Good job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism!? A Thought Crime! Must ferret out racism everywhere! Nothing else matters!
Posted by: unperson on Jul 15, 2006 3:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if we are all dying of cancer and heart disease and have no homes, nothing else matters but the hunt for Racists!

Burn 'em at the stake, I say!

Burn, witch, burn!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will Zirin eat his words now?
Posted by: lamashtu on Jul 15, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So now that we know nothing racist was said to Zidane before the infamous head-butt, should we expect corrections, apologies from race-hysteria mongering people like Mr Zirin?
There can be no doubt that Mr Zirin jumped on the occasion of the headbutt with gusto, pleased as Punch with his powers of prescience. Was he not the one who predicted it all?

Was he not the one who wrote BEFORE the World Cup that it will be spoiled by racist thugs? I (Counterpunch.com: “The most watched tournament in the universe, the World Cup, opens today amid fears that an open and violent racism could upstage the games, humiliate its German hosts, and provide an international platform for Neo-Nazi swill.”) I

Or is this thing called an agenda?

Mr Zirin, who clearly fancies himself a sports writer but is woefully ignorant of soccer – (FIFA transcripts of what is said on the pitch: priceless!!! This guy has obviously never been within a mile of a soccer game!!!) – has decided ahead of time that racism will be a feature of the World Cup and wrote about it with all due vehemence, displaying as much concern for facts as the neocons on their better days. His crowning achievement, the demand that Italy forfeit the cup, speaks for itself, a ridiculous utterance of a zealot.

But he might still carry the day, despite the tiny inconvenience that the racist allegations have been refuted. (And they have only been made by the media in the first place.) The incident is likely to go down in history as a racist one, a rather well-known side effect of biased media coverage.

Two final notes (1) there is nothing wrong with fighting racism until it crosses the line over to bigotry. (2) I was glad reading all the comments on this site: people can apparently still think for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm an Italian fan
Posted by: ethanay on Jul 15, 2006 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but personally, IF the racism allegations turn out to be true, I won't shed any tears...but I don't think any team deserves the Cup after a penalty shoot out (and I don't think any team should lose it based on a shoot out).

A lot of soccer is a mind-game. Hell, when I played classic and high school soccer anything that you could say--especially as a defensive player--to rile, unfocus, or otherwise harrass the other player was a plus for your team (not that I personally did it much...). i.e., "does he have a sister he's protective of? Great, cannon-fodder..." take them out of the game--if you do it pscyhologically, all the better.

It's part of strategy and technique--a well-known part. There are tons of unwritten rules to the game. One of the best known is giving the other team back the ball after they kick it out to stop play for an injury.

A brawl started between two teams this Cup when one of them violated this "rule."

I'm not excusing racist slurrs, but I think we need to distinguish intent--on the soccer field, someone who isn't necessarily racist can use racism as a technique to throw someone else off their game. I bet "racism" in this sense is very widespread, even (especially?) in the Cup.

Matarazzi might be a dick on the field, but maybe he's just an effective dick.

My underlying point: one of the reasons soccer is so great is that it has a culture to it--with its positives and negatives. I worry more about the destruction of that culture through over-regulation by the P.C. nazis. If the racism is there (with respect to both appearance AND intent), it should be fought on a cultural level, and that starts with leadership on the field.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

makeadifference
Posted by: makeadifference on Jul 17, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zidane... the new "shock-jock"! Check out this link for something to preserve the moment: http://www.cafepress.com/epochdesignshop/1534923

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement