COMMENTS: 72
Abortion Is a Basic Human Right
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
While the US and New Zealand have voted in favor, members in other nations are in the process of consulting and voting on the proposal. While the final decision won't be made until the end of next year, this debate is long overdue. Â
As 70,000 women die each year around the world as a direct result of unsafe abortion, and 600,000 more are seriously injured, human rights activists should move quickly to ensure that Amnesty makes this historic decision. As somebody who is aware of the impact that Amnesty can have on governments, I will be doing my utmost to support the proposal. Â
On February 10, 1990--the day Nelson Mandela was released from prison in South Africa--I was kidnapped by the Guatemalan government's notorious G-2 intelligence unit. For eight days, I was bound, beaten and physically and psychologically tortured in an attempt to gain information about the guerilla movement that I simply did not have. Like many of my medical colleagues, I had supported the opposition in Guatemala, providing medical supplies and emergency assistance to those who opposed the regime. But that was the extent of my support, I knew nothing that would interest my interrogators. Â
I was one of the few who survived my incarceration. Most were executed and then dumped in public places as a warning to others. But, due to an incredible campaign on my behalf, locally and internationally, I somehow was released; not unharmed, but alive. The tipping point for the security forces may have been a threatened national strike by the medical profession, but Amnesty International's immediate response also meant that the case was attracting international attention. Â
After I fled the country, I lived in New York and became closely involved in working with refugees--especially on the reproductive health needs of women fleeing war, torture and poverty. Â
At the time I left, Guatemala was coming to the end of the first democratically elected government. While some things had got better, others had stayed the same, and the vicious clampdown on all opposition continued. In my work as a pediatrician, I was in close contact with the results of immense government funding for an internal war, and little if any for the services required to run a small impoverished country. The lack of maternal health services lead to many deaths in childbirth, and many malnourished and sick children. Â
Through my work with the poor in Guatemala, it became increasingly apparent to me that all human rights advocates must, as a matter of high concern, support all women in their decisions whether or not to become or remain pregnant. In Guatemala, the subject of abortion never came up. It was practiced clandestinely, and I, like all health professionals, saw first-hand the after-effects of illegal abortion. No woman should be forced to go to such lengths to end a pregnancy that she cannot continue. Â
Reproductive rights in general and the right to end a pregnancy through abortion must become a basic part of the human rights canon. As a medical professional, a women's rights activist and somebody who has experienced first hand the positive impact that human-rights campaigners can have, I can clearly see the direct connection between Amnesty International's existing campaigns and the discussion about including abortion rights in future campaigns. Â
On the day I write this, I read that Amnesty International again has issued an alert about human rights abuses in my home country. On this day too, and every day, women who cannot gain access to safe abortion services are injured, made seriously ill, and die as a result of their inability to access a basic human right. Amnesty's decision to move from its current neutral position to one that supports women's rights to safe abortion is one that women around the world who cannot easily access such services will applaud.  Â
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 12:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Date?
Posted by: Tai Moses
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 1:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» guilty beyond your control
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» People do want to have kids
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: People do want to have kids
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Pickles78
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 11, 2006 3:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: HeroesAll
» WRONG
Posted by: russianblue1
» DERFB1
Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» A Life
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» Apparently you did not read
Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: lively56
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: nickptar
» agreed.
Posted by: omidele
» Is there an adequate level?
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Is there an adequate level?
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» Sooooooo?
Posted by: Joe Ox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Jul 11, 2006 5:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personal freedom trumps all. I don't have to like or even agree with any decision a person might make in their life, and can even voice my opinion of it, but I still have to stay out of their way and allow them to live according to their own discretion.
What the power-tripping control freaks do not understand is: How I live my life has no bearing on how you live yours; how you live your life has no bearing on how I live mine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver
» RE: So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: What makes someone a free person:
Posted by: nickptar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RichardT on Jul 11, 2006 9:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake up America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's Mostly Not About Religion
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: prod
» not extreme at all
Posted by: omidele
» The world as we know it will end
Posted by: jwg
» They don't ALL believe the End is near ...
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: digitalspy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenkahle on Jul 11, 2006 1:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: rockharper
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» I love this
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
» Violinist
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Violinist
Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
» RE: a new way to think about abortion
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: a new way to think about abortion
Posted by: kit79
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jul 11, 2006 1:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a while, the Iranian enthusiasm for throwing believed homosexuals off roofs was none of AI's concern. Then in the mid-80s, Gay concerns showed up on AI's radar ... and dropped off again.
Given that the UN Decade of the Woman conference couldn't get an explicitly pro-contraception resolution past their own all-female body of delegates ... an explicitly pro-abortion statement will not be seen as 'helpful' to AI's core mission.
At least we should expect their leadership cadre to see it that way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The issue is: What position Amnesty International should take
Posted by: aouie01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blue Heron on Jul 11, 2006 5:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: strange
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: strange
Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: strange
Posted by: nickptar
» "...the most vulnerable human beings possible."
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Jul 11, 2006 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would you like to argue that she should have sacrificed herself for a non-viable fetus and deprive a family of a parent? Would that be a family value?
If you cannot make a valid argument, then we have discovered a case where abortion is morally justifiable. By extension, we will discover other cases as well. However, with just one case wherein it can be demonstrated that having to abort a fetus is the moral choice, the blanket absolutism of the anti-abortionists falls apart. For this reason, women must be free to make their own reproductive choices (properly with the help of medical professionals).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Poe on Jul 12, 2006 5:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're sexually active and you're not interested in bringing children into the world, then it's your responsibility to practice birth control. To choose not to use some form of birth control, is to throw your "reproductive rights" out the window.
Just my two cents.
Poe
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As a man.....
Posted by: narcissus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 12, 2006 11:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lillith on Jul 12, 2006 6:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: happybear on Jul 13, 2006 5:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eastcoker on Jul 14, 2006 12:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you imagine being forced to abort your own child. This is ***horrible and atrocious***. Abortion is a human right. God help this to pass.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Burton on Jul 14, 2006 11:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I am seeing here is a form of cultural imperialism. Amnesty International has long since given up its original mandate to become an advocate for a quasi-liberalism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Multi-culturalism
Posted by: planet doomed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marykderr on Aug 2, 2006 10:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree wholeheartedly with her that women's choices deserve full support before pregnancy. It is the "after pregnancy" part that is troubling, when & if it means abortion. (If it means prenatal care, nutrition, shelter, male responsibility, etc. then I am all for after pregnancy choice.)
Legal or illegal, abortion is violence against unborn children and against pregnant women, caused by the violence of denying them real choices to prevent or complete difficult pregnancies, real choices to live *and* flourish.
(And no, I don't believe every woman HAS to be a mother, let alone keep on conceiving child after child. It is a matter of choice, indeed. But one to be achieved by liberty in nonviolent means like contraception [which of course needs to be made more foolproof], fertility awareness, celibacy, outercourse, same-sex relationships, and open adoption arrangements that are humane for birth mother and child alike.)
As someone who has taken part in many Amnesty International actions over the years, my heart sinks to learn that the organization may redefine a human rights abuse as an international human right.
I'd love it if Amnesty could take a pro-every life, pro-nonviolent choice stand on abortion. However, since supporters have a diversity of views on abortion, neutrality on the practice itself is probably the wisest course to take.
If anyone else here agrees & wants to take action agaisnt Amnesty's proposed shift from neutrality, please sign this petition:
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/consistentlife
And please pass this URL along to anyone who also may wish to sign.
Thank you.
Mary
www.xlibris.com/prolifefeminism
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 12:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Date?
Posted by: Tai Moses
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 1:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» guilty beyond your control
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» People do want to have kids
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: People do want to have kids
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: guilty beyond your control
Posted by: Pickles78
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 11, 2006 3:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: HeroesAll
» WRONG
Posted by: russianblue1
» DERFB1
Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» A Life
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» Apparently you did not read
Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: lively56
» RE: Not Just Abortion
Posted by: nickptar
» agreed.
Posted by: omidele
» Is there an adequate level?
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Is there an adequate level?
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» Sooooooo?
Posted by: Joe Ox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Jul 11, 2006 5:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personal freedom trumps all. I don't have to like or even agree with any decision a person might make in their life, and can even voice my opinion of it, but I still have to stay out of their way and allow them to live according to their own discretion.
What the power-tripping control freaks do not understand is: How I live my life has no bearing on how you live yours; how you live your life has no bearing on how I live mine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver
» RE: So Whatever you want to do everyone else has to allow?
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: What makes someone a free person:
Posted by: nickptar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RichardT on Jul 11, 2006 9:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake up America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's Mostly Not About Religion
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: prod
» not extreme at all
Posted by: omidele
» The world as we know it will end
Posted by: jwg
» They don't ALL believe the End is near ...
Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Missing the point
Posted by: digitalspy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenkahle on Jul 11, 2006 1:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: rockharper
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» I love this
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post
Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
» Violinist
Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Violinist
Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
» RE: a new way to think about abortion
Posted by: nickptar
» RE: a new way to think about abortion
Posted by: kit79
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jul 11, 2006 1:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a while, the Iranian enthusiasm for throwing believed homosexuals off roofs was none of AI's concern. Then in the mid-80s, Gay concerns showed up on AI's radar ... and dropped off again.
Given that the UN Decade of the Woman conference couldn't get an explicitly pro-contraception resolution past their own all-female body of delegates ... an explicitly pro-abortion statement will not be seen as 'helpful' to AI's core mission.
At least we should expect their leadership cadre to see it that way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The issue is: What position Amnesty International should take
Posted by: aouie01
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blue Heron on Jul 11, 2006 5:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: strange
Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: strange
Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: strange
Posted by: nickptar
» "...the most vulnerable human beings possible."
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Jul 11, 2006 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would you like to argue that she should have sacrificed herself for a non-viable fetus and deprive a family of a parent? Would that be a family value?
If you cannot make a valid argument, then we have discovered a case where abortion is morally justifiable. By extension, we will discover other cases as well. However, with just one case wherein it can be demonstrated that having to abort a fetus is the moral choice, the blanket absolutism of the anti-abortionists falls apart. For this reason, women must be free to make their own reproductive choices (properly with the help of medical professionals).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Poe on Jul 12, 2006 5:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're sexually active and you're not interested in bringing children into the world, then it's your responsibility to practice birth control. To choose not to use some form of birth control, is to throw your "reproductive rights" out the window.
Just my two cents.
Poe
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: As a man.....
Posted by: narcissus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 12, 2006 11:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lillith on Jul 12, 2006 6:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: happybear on Jul 13, 2006 5:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eastcoker on Jul 14, 2006 12:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you imagine being forced to abort your own child. This is ***horrible and atrocious***. Abortion is a human right. God help this to pass.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Burton on Jul 14, 2006 11:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I am seeing here is a form of cultural imperialism. Amnesty International has long since given up its original mandate to become an advocate for a quasi-liberalism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Multi-culturalism
Posted by: planet doomed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marykderr on Aug 2, 2006 10:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree wholeheartedly with her that women's choices deserve full support before pregnancy. It is the "after pregnancy" part that is troubling, when & if it means abortion. (If it means prenatal care, nutrition, shelter, male responsibility, etc. then I am all for after pregnancy choice.)
Legal or illegal, abortion is violence against unborn children and against pregnant women, caused by the violence of denying them real choices to prevent or complete difficult pregnancies, real choices to live *and* flourish.
(And no, I don't believe every woman HAS to be a mother, let alone keep on conceiving child after child. It is a matter of choice, indeed. But one to be achieved by liberty in nonviolent means like contraception [which of course needs to be made more foolproof], fertility awareness, celibacy, outercourse, same-sex relationships, and open adoption arrangements that are humane for birth mother and child alike.)
As someone who has taken part in many Amnesty International actions over the years, my heart sinks to learn that the organization may redefine a human rights abuse as an international human right.
I'd love it if Amnesty could take a pro-every life, pro-nonviolent choice stand on abortion. However, since supporters have a diversity of views on abortion, neutrality on the practice itself is probably the wisest course to take.
If anyone else here agrees & wants to take action agaisnt Amnesty's proposed shift from neutrality, please sign this petition:
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/consistentlife
And please pass this URL along to anyone who also may wish to sign.
Thank you.
Mary
www.xlibris.com/prolifefeminism
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




