Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Abortion Is a Basic Human Right

By Carmen Angélina Valenzuela, AlterNet. Posted July 11, 2006.


A doctor who was tortured for giving medical aid to Guatemalan rebels says a woman's right to end her pregnancy must be considered an international human right.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Carmen Angélina Valenzuela

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Amnesty International is in the midst of considering whether to include access to abortion in the list of rights that it supports. Many other organizations and individuals have long made the case that access to safe abortion services is a basic human right, one that saves thousands of women's lives and protects the health of many, many more.

While the US and New Zealand have voted in favor, members in other nations are in the process of consulting and voting on the proposal. While the final decision won't be made until the end of next year, this debate is long overdue.  

As 70,000 women die each year around the world as a direct result of unsafe abortion, and 600,000 more are seriously injured, human rights activists should move quickly to ensure that Amnesty makes this historic decision. As somebody who is aware of the impact that Amnesty can have on governments, I will be doing my utmost to support the proposal.  

On February 10, 1990--the day Nelson Mandela was released from prison in South Africa--I was kidnapped by the Guatemalan government's notorious G-2 intelligence unit. For eight days, I was bound, beaten and physically and psychologically tortured in an attempt to gain information about the guerilla movement that I simply did not have. Like many of my medical colleagues, I had supported the opposition in Guatemala, providing medical supplies and emergency assistance to those who opposed the regime. But that was the extent of my support, I knew nothing that would interest my interrogators.   

I was one of the few who survived my incarceration. Most were executed and then dumped in public places as a warning to others. But, due to an incredible campaign on my behalf, locally and internationally, I somehow was released; not unharmed, but alive. The tipping point for the security forces may have been a threatened national strike by the medical profession, but Amnesty International's immediate response also meant that the case was attracting international attention.  

After I fled the country, I lived in New York and became closely involved in working with refugees--especially on the reproductive health needs of women fleeing war, torture and poverty.   

At the time I left, Guatemala was coming to the end of the first democratically elected government. While some things had got better, others had stayed the same, and the vicious clampdown on all opposition continued. In my work as a pediatrician, I was in close contact with the results of immense government funding for an internal war, and little if any for the services required to run a small impoverished country. The lack of maternal health services lead to many deaths in childbirth, and many malnourished and sick children.  

Through my work with the poor in Guatemala, it became increasingly apparent to me that all human rights advocates must, as a matter of high concern, support all women in their decisions whether or not to become or remain pregnant. In Guatemala, the subject of abortion never came up. It was practiced clandestinely, and I, like all health professionals, saw first-hand the after-effects of illegal abortion. No woman should be forced to go to such lengths to end a pregnancy that she cannot continue.  

Reproductive rights in general and the right to end a pregnancy through abortion must become a basic part of the human rights canon. As a medical professional, a women's rights activist and somebody who has experienced first hand the positive impact that human-rights campaigners can have, I can clearly see the direct connection between Amnesty International's existing campaigns and the discussion about including abortion rights in future campaigns.  

On the day I write this, I read that Amnesty International again has issued an alert about human rights abuses in my home country. On this day too, and every day, women who cannot gain access to safe abortion services are injured, made seriously ill, and die as a result of their inability to access a basic human right. Amnesty's decision to move from its current neutral position to one that supports women's rights to safe abortion is one that women around the world who cannot easily access such services will applaud.     

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Dr. Carmen Angélina Valenzuela, a pediatrician, is senior program officer in the International Department at Catholics for a Free Choice and a commissioner of the Women's Commission for Refugee Women & Children.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Date?
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nelson Mandela was released from prison in 1990. Maybe the article could be slightly re-edited?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Date? Posted by: Tai Moses
And yes
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 11, 2006 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abortion should be a human right. Women should NOT be made slaves to our biology and to men's biologies and greed for power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» guilty beyond your control Posted by: coldeye
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: Aussie Kim
» People do want to have kids Posted by: coldeye
» RE: People do want to have kids Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: guilty beyond your control Posted by: Pickles78
Not Just Abortion
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 11, 2006 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not just about abortion and the root causes are the same in this country. First of all is the basic right for every human being to be educated, as a child and adolescent, about their bodies, how they work and most important sexuality and reproductive facts. Second is the tacit acceptance that men are not responsible for their sexual acts, especially when life is created. As long as these two are neglected there will always be the need for abortion. Providing safe procedures is the obligation of every country that cannot otherwise provide their citizens with adequate sex education and social repsonsibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: HeroesAll
» WRONG Posted by: russianblue1
» DERFB1 Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» A Life Posted by: AdamSelene40
» Apparently you did not read Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: lively56
» RE: Not Just Abortion Posted by: nickptar
» agreed. Posted by: omidele
» Is there an adequate level? Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Is there an adequate level? Posted by: ChristopherLL
» Sooooooo? Posted by: Joe Ox
What makes someone a free person:
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Jul 11, 2006 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What makes you a free person is that you have sole authority over and responsibility for your own self. When someone unilaterally accords to themselves authority over or responsibility for you, they necessarily reduce you to the status of a chattel.

Personal freedom trumps all. I don't have to like or even agree with any decision a person might make in their life, and can even voice my opinion of it, but I still have to stay out of their way and allow them to live according to their own discretion.

What the power-tripping control freaks do not understand is: How I live my life has no bearing on how you live yours; how you live your life has no bearing on how I live mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the point
Posted by: RichardT on Jul 11, 2006 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we have today with this administration is a religious perspective on all things. This means that they strongly believe that the “End Of Times” is imminent, and therefore it is imperative to have as many souls as possible for this occasion. That’s where the whole opposition to abortion comes from. This isn’t about reproductive rights. Nor about 70,000 women dying each year as a direct result of unsafe abortions. These 70,000 souls per year are already in play for the “End Of Times”.

Wake up America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missing the point Posted by: prod
» not extreme at all Posted by: omidele
» RE: Missing the point Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Missing the point Posted by: digitalspy
a new way to think about abortion
Posted by: lorenkahle on Jul 11, 2006 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone takes the perspective of the baby in abortion cases. pro-lifers insist that the baby has a right to live, the most ridiculous believe this from conception - nonsense! even pro-choice advocates believe the mother has the right to choose having the baby or not. try thinking of the rights of the mother deciding whether to allow an unwanted "living" thing to remain in her body. compare someone or something unwanted living in your home. by law you have the right to evict the unwanted life from your home. if that "person" dies on the street, has no food, can't support themselves, the law supports your decision. what is the difference when a woman determines the "life" inside her is unwanted? what if she chooses not to have this unwanted life leeching food and blood from her system, perhaps endangering her health? does not the law protect people in the same way it protects one's home? think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: rockharper
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» I love this Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sick and Absurd Post Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
» Violinist Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Violinist Posted by: MegOnTheMountain
The issue is: What position Amnesty International should take
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jul 11, 2006 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From time to time factions within AI get the idea that the organization ought to expand the scope of their concerns.

For a while, the Iranian enthusiasm for throwing believed homosexuals off roofs was none of AI's concern. Then in the mid-80s, Gay concerns showed up on AI's radar ... and dropped off again.

Given that the UN Decade of the Woman conference couldn't get an explicitly pro-contraception resolution past their own all-female body of delegates ... an explicitly pro-abortion statement will not be seen as 'helpful' to AI's core mission.

At least we should expect their leadership cadre to see it that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

strange
Posted by: Blue Heron on Jul 11, 2006 5:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one bothered to mention the right a woman has to abort when the fetus is a result of rape or incest. But that is not surprising - not many people are on the woman's side in this issue - sometimes not even women themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: strange Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: strange Posted by: ecoMamaNY
» RE: strange Posted by: nickptar
The Deciders
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Jul 11, 2006 8:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother, after already having had four children, became pregnant for a fifth time. For life threatening medical reasons, she had to have an abortion. I would like to hear the 'moral' argument by anti-abortionists which would have compelled her, by state edict, to continue to carry a fetus which would have killed her and my potential sibling.
Would you like to argue that she should have sacrificed herself for a non-viable fetus and deprive a family of a parent? Would that be a family value?
If you cannot make a valid argument, then we have discovered a case where abortion is morally justifiable. By extension, we will discover other cases as well. However, with just one case wherein it can be demonstrated that having to abort a fetus is the moral choice, the blanket absolutism of the anti-abortionists falls apart. For this reason, women must be free to make their own reproductive choices (properly with the help of medical professionals).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a man.....
Posted by: Poe on Jul 12, 2006 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....I think I have reproductive rights. We all do. We should all be responsible about our reproductive rights, also. While I believe abortion should be a legal and safe option for obvious reasons, I think the majority of abortions performed in this country are done as a matter of convenience, and is the result of an irresponsible lifestyle. That's pathetic, given the vast choices and methods of birth control that are so accessible to everyone, including teens and the poorest of the poor.

If you're sexually active and you're not interested in bringing children into the world, then it's your responsibility to practice birth control. To choose not to use some form of birth control, is to throw your "reproductive rights" out the window.

Just my two cents.

Poe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As a man..... Posted by: narcissus
Reproductive rights are non-negotiable
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 12, 2006 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If "human rights" are to be truly human rights and not just men's rights or the rights of those who are either not sexually active or not capable of reproduction, they have to include reproductive rights. That doesn't just include the right to have an abortion; it includes the right to birth control and the right not to be sterilized without your consent. I know abortion makes some people queasy. It makes me, a long-time feminist, queasy, and I'm glad I've never been faced with the need to have one. (Being a lesbian helps, and luck: I've never been sexually assaulted.) For women, human rights have to include the right not to be pregnant against one's will, and the right can't be restricted to women who have the money and connections to travel to another state or another country for birth control or an abortion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US have voted in favour of
Posted by: Lillith on Jul 12, 2006 6:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW....I can't believe it...in favour of?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

waterman
Posted by: happybear on Jul 13, 2006 5:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have said this before in these discussions, and been chastised and worse for it, but I believe the only choice is made when sex is consumed between a man and a woman. When that happens, the choice to become pregnant is no longer available. The natural consequence of sexual relations is pregnancy. Sometimes, natural circumstances allow for an interruption of the natural course of events, but most often, pregnancy is the result. If any woman has sexual intercourse with a man, she will most likely become pregnant. If her choice is not to have children, then BEFORE the sex act, she should make the choice NOT to try to beat the odds. The RESPONSIBILITY after the sex act is to accept the consequences of her choice. If there are special circumstances making the woman UNABLE to choose before the sex act (NOT poor judgement; I was drunk, or on drugs, Etc.) such as rape, then the responsible person needs to accept the resposibility for the results of the act. No woman should be able to freely choose to terminate her pregnancy after she CHOOSES to have sex with a man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a story
Posted by: eastcoker on Jul 14, 2006 12:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God, this brought tear to my eyes. Not only do I know a doctor who worked in Guatemela, one of my best friends in high school father was killed in Guatemala, a German.
Can you imagine being forced to abort your own child. This is ***horrible and atrocious***. Abortion is a human right. God help this to pass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Multi-culturalism
Posted by: Burton on Jul 14, 2006 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a supporter of abortion rights, but there is a very serious issue here. In many cultures, abortion is considered wrong. Now, are we going to disrespect these cultures? And if we do, will there be a backlash? Are we to say that the Catholic Church is violating human rights owing to its stand on birth control?

What I am seeing here is a form of cultural imperialism. Amnesty International has long since given up its original mandate to become an advocate for a quasi-liberalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Multi-culturalism Posted by: planet doomed
Violence not the answer to violence
Posted by: marykderr on Aug 2, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is deeply admirable and courageous for her willingness to risk her own life & liberty in support of the Guatemalan resistance, and for her empathy with other women's sufferings.

I agree wholeheartedly with her that women's choices deserve full support before pregnancy. It is the "after pregnancy" part that is troubling, when & if it means abortion. (If it means prenatal care, nutrition, shelter, male responsibility, etc. then I am all for after pregnancy choice.)

Legal or illegal, abortion is violence against unborn children and against pregnant women, caused by the violence of denying them real choices to prevent or complete difficult pregnancies, real choices to live *and* flourish.

(And no, I don't believe every woman HAS to be a mother, let alone keep on conceiving child after child. It is a matter of choice, indeed. But one to be achieved by liberty in nonviolent means like contraception [which of course needs to be made more foolproof], fertility awareness, celibacy, outercourse, same-sex relationships, and open adoption arrangements that are humane for birth mother and child alike.)

As someone who has taken part in many Amnesty International actions over the years, my heart sinks to learn that the organization may redefine a human rights abuse as an international human right.

I'd love it if Amnesty could take a pro-every life, pro-nonviolent choice stand on abortion. However, since supporters have a diversity of views on abortion, neutrality on the practice itself is probably the wisest course to take.

If anyone else here agrees & wants to take action agaisnt Amnesty's proposed shift from neutrality, please sign this petition:

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/consistentlife

And please pass this URL along to anyone who also may wish to sign.

Thank you.
Mary
www.xlibris.com/prolifefeminism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement