Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

True Tales of Modern-Day Slaves

By Anneli Rufus, AlterNet. Posted July 11, 2006.


Despite the Civil War, slavery hasn't gone away. Three writers consider what life is like for the more than 27 million people on Earth who don't even own themselves.
071106_story
A 9-year-old girl makes bricks from morning to night, seven days a week; she was trafficked with her entire family from one of the poorest states in India, and sold to the owner of a brick-making factory.
Advertisement

Say what you will about the USA, but slavery has been illegal here since the 13th Amendment was ratified in 1865, and was outlawed long before that in many states. North Americans tend to see slavery in sepia tones, as a legacy, because in practice it belongs to our receding past.

OK, not for the preteen girl forced to serve the large Orange County family of Abdelnasser Eid Youssef Ibrahim and Amal Ahmed Ewis-abd Motelib from 2000 to 2002 while being slapped and threatened and forbidden to go outside. But Ibrahim and Motelib are on trial, charged with keeping a child in involuntary servitude, facing an October 23 sentencing. As part of a plea deal, they must pay the now-16-year-old some $100,000 in restitution and back wages. In the courtroom, Motelib told the judge through a translator: "We did a mistake here in the United States of America because … at that time we were new here." The Los Angeles Times called the keeping of poor children as servants in wealthy households "a common though illegal practice in Egypt."

Slavery thrives. From Albanian sex workers to Indian cigarette-rollers to black Africans bought and sold in Mauritania and Sudan: According to latter-day abolitionists such as the Boston-based American Anti-Slavery Group, more people -- AASG estimates some 27 million -- are owned now than ever before.

As Andrew Crofts writes in The Little Hero: One Boy's Fight For Freedom (Vision Press, 2006), Iqbal Masih was four years old when his half-brother, contemplating marriage and seeking capital, sold the boy to a carpet maker. A few months later, the first carpet maker sold Iqbal to another carpet maker, in whose factory he joined rows of empty-eyed children who hunched coughing over looms, raped now and then by overseers. Far from home, the laborers "didn't even know the names of their villages … the single room of the factory was the only world they knew." Slashed sometimes by the sharp weaving-tools they plied in semidarkness, "they would have to dip the wounds into burning hot oil to seal them and then go back to work the moment the blood had stopped flowing." Sleeping on the crowded factory floor as those first few months turned into six years, Iqbal strained to remember his toddlerhood days spent splashing with friends in a sun-dappled canal.

Child labor and other forms of slavery are illegal in Pakistan, but Crofts describes a crushing silence and indifference that sustains the old system for money's sake: "Life is cheap in Lahore." One night Iqbal managed to flee through a window and find a policeman, whom he begged to arrest the factory boss. Instead, the cop brought him back to be punished by being hung upside down from a twirling ceiling fan. Escaping again, Iqbal lived on the street eating slops -- "a small boy flitting in and out of the shadows like a night insect," ventures Crofts, a British ghostwriter who under other bylines has written celebrity "autobiographies" and who recounts Iqbal's saga in passages by turns preachy and pretty ("a fanfare of horn blasts"; "a maze of towering walls"), but ever-earnest. How else, anyway, could you tell the true tale of someone the world imagines exists only in history books: a slave, born in 1982?

At a rally whose printed banners looked like mere squiggles to him, Iqbal discovered the Bonded Labour Liberation Front (BLLF), an India-based NGO at whose Lahore Freedom Campus he and other ex-slaves slept serenely behind steel gates and learned "to read and write, to add up numbers, so [they] can get proper jobs." As the school's most outspoken crusader, joining rescue-raids on factories whose chattel escaped onto BLLF trucks shouting, "We are free," adolescent Iqbal gained international fame, winning a $10,000 Reebok Foundation Youth in Action Award at age 12. A few months later, he was gunned down while riding a bicycle in the Pakistani countryside. This isn't a spoiler, so don't say I've ruined your surprise. Croft starts his book with the death scene. The rest is in flashback. BLLF maintains that Iqbal was assassinated by a "carpet-mafia" hitman. Pakistani officials contend that the slaying was unrelated to Iqbal's activism, but that he mocked a farm worker whom he discovered having sex with a donkey, and the farm worker shot him.

Thanks largely to corporate giant Reebok -- and ABC News, which named him its Person of the Week -- Iqbal Masih became a household name, at least among Western confabs such as myhero.com and freethechildren.org, and in Western classrooms where his story has spawned countless antislavery assignments. By contrast, most unpaid laborers live and die in total obscurity, picking coffee beans in Benin, planting pipelines in Burma, scrubbing floors in Paris and sucking dick everywhere undreamed-of, which of course is the whole point of not paying them. Tourists snap temple photos. Shoppers simper over diamonds and silk. It's so easy not to imagine the loom, the plough, the Chinese prison yard where petty thieves and Falun Gongers paint Easter toys and knit sweaters all night for the Western world. Let a hundred boycotts bloom. But still.

It's the undocumented-immigrant sex trade that Juan Bonilla skewers in his novel "The Nubian Prince" (Metropolitan, 2006). Its narrator, Moisés Calderón, the restless intellectual twentysomething son of suicidal parents, travels far and wide as a scout for Club Olympus, the world's most exclusive hot box. Its "boys and girls … serve as companions or pets" to fantastically rich clients who pay 600 euros for actual acts and another 300 for "image rights": memories, jackoff-fodder -- "You know," Moiss explains with the shimmering boredom that Bonilla nails so well, "all the fantasy sex the clients will have after it's over."


Digg!

Photo credit: (c) Kay Chernush for the U.S. State Department. Courtesy of Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Modern slavery widespread in countries subject to UN projects
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 11, 2006 3:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice how it is the areas of the world that have received vast sums of aid and money from the like of the UN, that also have a growing slavery problem? It could be no better example of the failure of the conventional UN and aid doctrine.

The most common failure is to say that we should defer to local cultures and habits. This plays into the hands of local elite, who don't change their ways. Many are on the UN payroll in one form or another.

The only thing that changes the raw rights of the individual is political transformation. It will not happen by publishing nice glossy reports, or having Angelina Joli come by for a drink, or by having gender awareness workshops.

India, for example, has received little outside criticism of its backward social arrangements. Instead, the Bramin elite class has been able to further enrich themselves on the back of western immigration schemes that favour educated people from the developing world. Naive westerners buy the line that because this person has a dark complexion, they must be the victim of millennia of oppression. It isn't true. Most of these people are from the elites of their country: to compare, it is like feeling sorry for Bush and gang if they had to emigrate to another country. Its a bummer to have to move, but there is a big difference between coming from an elite and coming from the poor and downtrodden.

We have been peddled a lie: that people will become free if we send over highly paid UN bureaucrats and NGO folks. The only thing that will change these conditions is to fight for real political rights, and to provide jobs that pay enough to live on. But there will always be a market somewhere for young women in prostitution. It is a commodity that has a finite span and thus becomes more valuable as our population ages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Modern slavery Posted by: Arvy
Modern slavery
Posted by: Arvy on Jul 11, 2006 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more things change the more they stay the same…

Once we in the west grew rich off the back of slaves imported from the near east. Why pay a worker when you have free, unlimited, disposable slaves. We pat ourselves on the back because "those days are over" and "we became enlightened".
If it comforts you then keep believing that…

Now we have free trade zones, where "developing" countries create "free-trade-zones" i.e. areas where foreign (western, mostly) companies can get their manufacturing work done without paying tax and the usual health, pension, insurance, benefits. Without having to worry about conditions, working hours etc.

The people who take this work are desperate, they didn't ask for their land to be turned into a dam (or some similar version of 'progress'). They had quite a nice life when they only had to worry about themselves. Now they have the global market on their back pushing them off their land, forcing them into shanty towns around already crowded cities.

Our business leaders say these people are 'lucky' to be working, earning, feeding their families. Right. When we first arrived in India we were shocked at the natural wealth available to these people, a wealth they managed to share somehow. A wealth we greedily stole (and are still stealing).

Stop buying stuff! It's the most direct way to effect change as far as I can see. Since it's the corporations that are running the show it seems reasonable to assume that we, the consumer, are empowering them to do their work. It's not some evil conspiracy, just sleepwalking machines doing what they do.

WAKE UP!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Modern slavery Posted by: four_legs_good_two_legs_bad
» RE: Modern slavery Posted by: Arvy
» RE: Modern slavery Posted by: Jesse
» Clean Trade Campaign? Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Modern slavery Posted by: Iconoclast421
Slavery in America did not end in 1865
Posted by: billyboy43 on Jul 11, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was 5 yeras old in the Delta of Mississippi, our family moved to a new plantation near very rural Inverness, Mississippi in 1954. The plantation house was huge, with 14 rooms upstairs, all hardwood floors. The downstairs appeared to be hardly finished - dirt floors, a concrete walkway to the various rooms, except 2 rooms and a bath that was walled-off from the rest of the downstairs. The house had been built in 1910. The house had also survived the 1927 flood, rumored to have housed 30 families in the upstairs. As I and my siblings and mother were to find, the house had 'noises' - mostly chains rattling, some coughing, and some footsteps on the hardwood at night - always when my father was not there. When he was there the house was quite, and dad didn't believe our stories. The family sold the plantation in 1962, and the new owners demolised the house, and built a new one on a different plot of ground. We knew why.
Late my sister was doing some family tree research, and found an article about the daughter of the family which had built the house, so she paid her a visit, and asked about the house, and yes her father and mother had the house built in 1910. When asked why the downstairs wasn't finished, she replied, 'It was finished - good enough for the slaves', which were kept in leg irons on the dirt floors. The two rooms and bath walled from the rest of the downstairs were the slave master's quarters, a Mr. Lester.
This was probably not a unique circumstance, but practiced in veiled silence in many places throughout the South after the Civil War and well into the 20th century. I'm guessing the slaves were left in their legirons when the 1927 flood came, and washed the dirty truth away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's still happening here Posted by: Artkansas
Powerful Education Tool
Posted by: coldeye on Jul 11, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article would be invaluable for middle and high school students as they study American slavery in lit and history classes. Too often kids cannot relate to anything that happened prior to their generation. I am forrwarding this to friends of mine who teach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Powerful Education Tool Posted by: Burton
mdruss42
Posted by: mdruss42 on Jul 11, 2006 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DID NOT SEE ANY MENTION OF THE SLAVERY OF THE GARMENT FACTORIES IN THE US WHO WERE FOUND WITH LOCKED IN WORKERS, AS WELL AS THE MARIANA ISLAND SCANDAL OF LOTS OF WOMEN LOCKED UP TO SEW THE CLOTHES WE WEAR WITH THE FANCY LABELS AND ALSO ACT AS SEX SLAVES IN THEIR SPARE TIME, OR THAT IN CHINA OUR CLOTHES ARE MADE BY PRISONERS, FOR NOTHING. WHAT A WINDFALL FOR ALL THE FANCY DESIGNERS.......AND LOOK IN FORBES AND SEE HOW THEIR INCOMES INCREASED ONCE THEY DISCOVERED CHINA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mdruss42 Posted by: mrcentrist
» RE: mdruss42 Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: I'M SHOUTING! Posted by: Ghoulman
May 1979- Training Manual 74-1120
Posted by: mite on Jul 11, 2006 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there was a book that explained modern slavery it is `Behold A Pale Horse' by Milton William Cooper. In his book he explains how the world elite even provide manuals how to enslave the populations' of the world.
But someday I hope the people of this country will wake up, all of a stigma of how slavery should be- the african-americans, china's lower-lower class, and southern Americans amoung the many types of slaves. I have a shocker- we are ALL slaves of our society and its marketing, banks, and credit.
When one controls everything from water-food, clothes, and shelter, nothing else really matters.
You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greely, employed as its london corresponent an obsecure journalist by the name of Karl Marx. Stone broke and an ill family he requested an increase in his salary of $5 per installment over a lengthy time, always refused by the the publishers. We all know what happened because of the upper elites greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Types of Slavery
Posted by: pure_genius on Jul 11, 2006 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you a slave when you are forced to work, or only when forced with no money to me made?

If being forced is the linchpin of slavery, there are still millions of slaves in America. We have 2.2 million people incarcerated nationwide, 68% are black. That's a rate of 4,419 per 100,000. The rate for whites is 714 and the national rate is 724. For reference, The "human rights abuser" China's rate is 118. During the height of Apartheid black Africans, in South Africa, were being incarcerated at a rate of 851.

When our justice system incarcerates 7 times more than China and jails blacks at a rate over 5 times higher than Apartheid, the problem is obviously a systemic one, not a criminal one. The recent Supreme Court ruling Hudson V. Michigan will only exacerbate this issue and many innocent civilians and law enforcement officers will be hurt and killed in the process.

Much of what we see today can traced directly to the lesson learned by Congress at the end of Prohibition. They should have learned it didn't work, they instead decided that consitutional amendments that restrict rights are too drastic politically, but not ethically. The question became, "How do we do this without amending it?" The sadistically brilliant idea came in the form of using the Commerce Clause to subvert States Rights.

When America, as a whole, sees that the U.S. prison system has morphed from a place meant for rehabilitation, to a pool of extremely cheap labor, policies can begin to change. This pool is continually supplied by policies that push people to the brink. When a prisoner of moderate intelligence goes to jail and sees he can work for the any of the Fortune 500, for 3 cents a hour, for 10-20 years, but can't use those new skills in the real job market, what should their perception be.

Today the privatization of so many prisons, has lobbyists going to Congress to advocate for more and longer mandatory minimums, which feeds the labor face and increases profit. Given the fact that the corporate person is a sociopath by design and law, what other kind of person can it be when its sole client is a "filthy prisoner". In my opinion, nothing but a more dastardly sociopath.

As an individual with Asperger's syndrome who only wishes for the best balance of interests possible, this issue burdens by heart every day that I awake.

Sources: The Sentencing Project (PDF), LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition), Various DOJ and Bureau of Prisons reports

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Penal servitude is not slavery Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
» No, they're just stupid Posted by: brunowe
» RE: No, they're just stupid Posted by: pure_genius
» RE: Penal servitude is not slavery Posted by: pure_genius
» RE: Penal servitude is not slavery Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Types of Slavery Posted by: nim1
» hey genius, Posted by: harris
» RE: hey genius, Posted by: pure_genius
» Reborn Slavery Posted by: Burton
Slavery is Biblical
Posted by: nim1 on Jul 11, 2006 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is because of slavery that I walked away from Judism, Christianity, et al. This most inhuman of injustices inflicted upon fellow beings is not condemned by the "Great Truth" of the religions of this world! How can anyone who is sound of mind consider it decent and permissable to "own" a fellow human being? And wait, you haven't heard the end of it just yet. The fundamentalist so-called christians and their inerrant Bible makes them enemies of an enlightened society. As you know, they are busily at work trying to destroy the Constitution, and to impose a theocracy upon the USA. The Capital dome will be surmounted by a Cross. A Cross that we slaves will be able to turn to for mercy and freedom?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey! Posted by: harris
» RE: Slavery is Biblical Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Dead white guys Posted by: Burton
BIG SUGAR
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 11, 2006 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking of slavery... BIG SUGAR is playing on the CBC, part II is tonight so don't miss it! No, not the band, the documentary. ;p

Check it out online here at the CBC website.

Here's a taste...
Big Sugar explores the dark history and modern power of the world's reigning sugar cartels. Using dramatic reenactments, it reveals how sugar was at the heart of slavery in the West Indies in the 18th century, while showing how present-day consumers are slaves to a sugar-based diet. A lost chapter of Canadian history is discovered, illustrating how 18th century sugar lobbyists in England used blackmail and bribes to determine the fate of Canada.

Yup. basically, Canada became British over a sugar deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, quite right. Posted by: Ghoulman
slavery is a growing problem
Posted by: sberg on Jul 11, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was good to see a liberal website addressing the expanding issue of globalized slavery and it was great to see the expansive breadth of the subject matter handled so well by the author.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just hope...
Posted by: magistre on Jul 11, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just hope that G.W.B doesn't read this and get ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I just hope... Posted by: morticia
» RE: I just hope... Posted by: Aussie Kim
Good article,but...
Posted by: harris on Jul 11, 2006 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds really cruel calling enslaved children whores. That was bad thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not being funny, flippant or sarcastic here but..
Posted by: blackinjun on Jul 11, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the difference btw physical enslavement and mental enslavement? In fact, if you were just mentally enslaved you may be able to find a way to remove yourself from the environment where slavery existed. However mental enslavement IS your environment.

Why are soooo many black Americans so messed up and can't get it together?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BREAKING NEWS: US IS PREPARING TO "FREE" TRADE WITH NORTH KOREA !!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 11, 2006 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Bush, Congress consider free trade pact with North Korea

By David Sirota

My flight to D.C. got cancelled, so I am stuck in the Salt Lake City airport and had time to do one post.
In getting ready for the big National Press Club event tomorrow to discuss the politics of “free” trade – and Washington’s refusal to back off selling out Americans – I came across this positively shocking piece in the Wall Street Journal. The broad strokes are simple: the Bush administration and both parties in Congress are considering signing a "free" trade pact with South Korea that would cover a special project in North Korea that allows Big Money interests to exploit the enslaved people there.

This proposed deal goes beyond the other awful trade deals that we've watched the Bush administration and Congress consider recently - it goes beyond the job-destroying Central American Free Trade Agreement and even beyond the proposed trade pact with Malaysia, a country that prohibits a minimum wage. This trade pact "would be the U.S.'s largest pact since the North American Free Trade Agreement passed Congress more than a decade ago." The Journal story, of course, is filled with hedging. No one wants to come out and say this is what the trade negotiations are all about, or that they really want this North Korea piece - even though its obvious Big Money is salivating for it. What they want is the issue to go back into the background and get quietly passed without anyone noticing. They would rather the public ignore the effort to validate the "joint-venture Kaesong industrial complex in North Korea" that "combines South Korean capital with North Korean labor" (read: combines multinational corporate cash with exploitable slaves). By the time the complex is in full operation in 2012, "it could employ more than 750,000 North Koreans" – again, North Koreans who are literally enslaved and barred from leaving their prison.

Geopolitically, this is like the Dubai Ports controversy on steroids. During that controversy, the Bush administration ignored its own military officials’ warnings and tried to allow a foreign government to purchase our critical infrastructure – effectively going on record as saying our international trade policy prioritizes profits over national security. Now, we have a U.S. administration publicly considering economically rewarding a country that is test firing missiles, developing nuclear weapons, and threatening our allies - rewarding this global threat with a trade pact that validates that aggressor’s enslavement of its population.

But even beyond the geopolitical implications are the implications for American workers – and workers all over the globe. Even considering this atrocious pact lays bare what our government sees our "free" trade as: a vehicle for driving wages, workplace standards, environmental protections and standards of living into the ground in order to pad Big Money's bottom line. Such a deal would force the world’s workers to compete with slave labor. It would rewarding a dictator like Kim Jong Il in that it would create a premium for corporations to exploit his enslaved population. The fact that this is even being talked about as a legitimate consideration inside our governemnt tells you everything you need to know about the hostile takeover of our government by Big Money interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Continued ... BREAKING NEWS: US IS PREPARING TO "FREE" TRADE WITH NORTH KOREA !!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 11, 2006 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]


In my new book Hostile Takeover, I referred to North Korea as an extreme example to illustrate where our “free” trade policy really is going. Here is the excerpt:


"It begs the simple question: where does it all end? When Americans’ wages rose, during the early and mid-twentieth century, 'free' trade deals like NAFTA, the China pact and CAFTA forced us to choose either lower wages or the elimination of our jobs. As Latin Americans’ wages rise, their jobs are now getting shipped off to China. If Chinese wages eventually rise because workers there start demanding a better life, where’s next? Will we suddenly see a 'free' trade agreement with North Korea – a country whose dictator has quite literally enslaved his population? Forget about 'low-wage' labor – Big Business would have access to 'no-wage' labor. Are our politicians going to suddenly start telling us that’s a good thing that America’s trade policy should encourage and reward? If you think this is hyperbole, remember: Corporate America has admitted this downward spiral is precisely its goal. As GE CEO Jack Welch has said, Big Business's objective is 'ideally [to] have every plant you own on a barge.' Exactly – with U.S. government trade policy encouraging that barge to move away from whatever country’s workers demand better wages."
Sadly, the North Korea example seems not that far off from reality. Undoubtedly, Big Money interests will trot out politicians from both parties to once again tell us this is all good for American workers, even as wages continue to stagnate, pensions get cut, and health care benefits eliminated. We see the outlines of the upcoming propaganda campaign already, as the Journal says a "business coalition including U.S. auto makers, financial-services firms and drug manufacturers sees important market-access gains to be had." The term "market-access" as we have seen over the last decade of "free" trade, is a euphemism for job outsourcing, and downward wage/benefit pressure at home as Americans are forced to compete with oppressed workers.

Similarly, pundits like Tom Friedman and David Brooks will likely travel to the Four Seasons in Seoul, look out their window at a breakfast with a couple of American CEOs and then tell us that those who want this trade policy reformed are crazy, that rewarding dictators who oppress their people is a utopian dream - and then blurt out a nonsequitur that "the world is flat" (whatever the hell that nonsensical term actually means).

Clearly, though, it is the bought off, the dishonest and the immoral who would continue justifying a trade policy that deliberately eliminates all wage, workplace, environmental and human rights protections. It is these elitists who would sit by while our government openly debates whether to reward a country like North Korea for its horrific treatment of its people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do not regret the past nor shut the door on it
Posted by: eastcoker on Jul 11, 2006 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America can't deal with it's enslaved past? Uh-huh. That's why it's tourists are over the world raping slave boys, right?
Never stop talking about America's past. Never forget. Bravo for this article.
In a land of luxury cars, luxury boats, luxury homes, luxury clothes, luxury shoes, luxury Brazilian waxes, luxury gyms, luxury drinks, luxury drugs, we ought to be ashamed of ourselves.
Hell is going to be full by the end of this century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Restavec
Posted by: nickbk on Jul 12, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not mentioned were the Haitian Restavec
not 90 min from Miami , children and adults bought and sold.

Its a crying shame.
~ La Sirena

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: estavec Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: estavec Posted by: Aussie Kim
RE: Penal servitude is not slavery
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jul 16, 2006 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's keep it REALLY simple: If, in examining the "two states" there is no substantive difference, you are talking about the same thing under different names.

Slavery under ANY name, for ANY reason, is EVIL.

If human beings have any value at all, they are too damned valuable to be property. If each does indeed have a soul, the gift of God of a spark of the Divine, then the owner and everyone else involved commits an evil as terrible as any other, however heinous.

Any questions?

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]