COMMENTS: 65
Climate Change Is a Women's Issue
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
For Bangladeshi women, this is particularly bad news. In some past floods--such as in April 1991 following a Category 4 cyclone--the death rate for women was five times that of men.
Several international women's rights groups from the United States, Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands have banded together at recent United Nations meetings on climate change to call attention to this and other examples that illustrate how global warming will perpetuate gender inequalities.
"Unless these realities are understood at the global, national and local level, our policies to prevent and redress climate change and natural disasters are unlikely to reach women, who are not only the most vulnerable but also key agents for survival and stability in the community," said June Zeitlin, executive director of the New York-based Women's Environment and Development Organization, which advocates for women's rights in global policy.
Neither the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change--the first international treaty to address global warming, which entered into force in 1994--nor the Kyoto Protocol, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2012 through legally binding measures, mentions gender. Demanding Inclusion in Treaty
Since women's activists consider further changes to the Kyoto treaty unlikely they are focusing on negotiations over a post-Kyoto agreement, which began at a U.N. meeting in Montreal last December. They are demanding that this treaty addresses the different ways men and women will be affected by global warming and climate policies.
With the share of women in government delegations at the annual U.N. meetings on climate change ranging between 15 percent and 30 percent in the past 11 years, women's advocates are also pressing governments and the U.N. to fully involve women in planning and implementing environmental projects at both the international and local levels.
Many scientists attribute global warming to the release of greenhouse gases by industrial processes and the burning of fossil fuels. The White House, however, has been skeptical that global warming can be attributed to man-made causes. The Bush administration refused to sign the Kyoto treaty, saying its restrictions only on industrialized countries are unfair. Australia is the only other developed nation to not ratify Kyoto.
If the present rate of emissions is not reduced, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts worldwide temperatures will rise between 2.5 to 10.4 Fahrenheit degrees by 2100, resulting in more extreme weather conditions. This, in turn, is expected to undermine access to food and other resources, as well as increase threats to human health. According to the panel's 2001 assessment, climate change will hit developing countries--and the world's poorest populations--the hardest.
"Women are particularly vulnerable to adverse impacts from climate change because they are disproportionately poor and lacking in access to clean water, adequate nutrition, health care and shelter," said Neil Leary, who directs a project assessing the impact of climate change for the United Nations Environment Program and the Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training, a Washington-based environmental research organization. "The livelihoods of women are often highly dependent upon resources that are strongly influenced by climate."
Women--by tending livestock, growing vegetable gardens and cultivating subsistence crops such as rice--are responsible for between 70 percent and 80 percent of household food production in sub-Saharan Africa, 65 percent in Asia and 45 percent in Latin America.
Collecting water and firewood also often falls to women. As crop yields are reduced and resources become scarcer, women's workloads will only become more time-consuming and burdensome, jeopardizing chances to work outside the home or attend school.
At the same time, women's traditional knowledge and skills have helped communities cope with severe weather. During a drought in Micronesia, for instance, local women, familiar with island hydrology, found new water sources for their communities.
Amid scant data on gender and climate change, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization has just given funding to Genanet--a project in Frankfurt, Germany, that promotes gender equality in environmental policies--to begin in August to analyze research and to develop gender-sensitive proposals for mitigating global warming and adapting to it.
Ulrike Rohr, director of Genanet, attributes the low participation of women's advocates in the gatherings to an exclusively scientific and technical approach to global warming and treaty negotiations.
"Women feel like they can't enter the discussions," she said. Although there are female experts and policymakers present at the meetings, the overall conversation has been dominated by emissions trading and new markets, without consideration for poverty or social and economic inequities, she argued.
Women's advocates, however, are beginning to wedge themselves into U.N. environmental policymaking.
At a meeting in Montreal last December, for instance, the Women's Environment and Development Organization, which advocates for women's rights in global policy, got involved for the first time. The group's Zeitlin says she was shocked to find the meeting almost exclusively concerned with science, technology and money.
"The social upheaval and social costs of climate change and natural disasters were barely discussed."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 10, 2006 3:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: mazel
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: annm
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» Women have controlled the wealth in this country for decades.
Posted by: fork
» RE: Women have controlled the wealth in this country for decades.
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Women's wealth control
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Women's wealth control
Posted by: Burton
» RE: Women's wealth control
Posted by: Burton
» Global Warming
Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Global Warming
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Global Warming
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: ann83
» as long as it gets women interested in the issue
Posted by: repo
» Eliminate Most of the Third World Population: Good Idea But Is that What You Want?
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: four_legs_good_two_legs_bad on Jul 10, 2006 4:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for environmentalism and the supposed global warming, I have been on this earth for quite some time. It does not seem any warmer to me. Also, the earth goes through many temperature fluctuations anyway.
Of course it seems logical that more people living a western lifestyle is going to warm the planet through the increased use of energy. So here is a solution --stop immigration into America.
Problem solved. Of course that means rich investors will make less profit because wages would go up. Tough for them. However, the so called progressive faction of America seems closely aligned with the rich and the right wing, and supports more and more immigration despite the costs to the environment.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» God/Nature Are Racists!
Posted by: knocko
» RE: God/Nature Are Racists!
Posted by: MatthewSavage
» Economic Growth Will Not Be Sacrificed For Enviro-Fairy Tales
Posted by: knocko
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drappleby on Jul 10, 2006 4:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: mazel
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: mazel
» Relax and enjoy the warmth
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Climate Change answers are HERE
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Jul 10, 2006 5:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nutrient-poor crops. Submerged beach houses. Tornado warnings in California. Doubled hurricane activity in the gulf. Fewer airplane flights. Increased insect populations. Tropical diseases moving northward. Dead fisheries. Drought. Ground buckling with the loss of permafrost.
Everyone gets effected eventually. Let men sign the treaties to save their own asses; that's more likely to convince tham than worrying about the little old ladies of Bangladesh. Old ladies' lives are just as valuable (if not more so), but the point is getting something done, not grandstanding.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Global Climate Change Not the Biggest Deal for The World
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SBK on Jul 10, 2006 5:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Are Whites the Macro and Asians the Micro and Blacks the Zero?
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Are Whites the Macro and Asians the Micro and Blacks the Zero?
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 10, 2006 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the best of my knowledge, the POTUS (and his administration) lacks authority to sign the treaty into law.*
Ratifications of treaties are a matter for Congress.**
*9th grade civics, test 1
**9th grade civics, midterm
Goodness is it ever frustrating when people on the left rush to give the grand poobah more authority than he's already lavished upon himself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ted Kennedy global warming hypocrite
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: munchkinpup on Jul 10, 2006 8:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, global warming exists. How many reputable scientists have to yak about this truth before humankind wakes the hell up???!!! Maybe all of you morons won't be around to find out what happens, but your grand-children or great grand children just might have to worry about it!
Why don't all you trolls go find something else to do this summer- like jump into a nice cool polluted lake or river.
Here's some additional reading for your hopeful enlightenment from the year 2001, and David Corn's words prove to be prophetic: "George W. Bush: The Un-Science Guy" By David Corn, June 19, 2001
"George W. claims that global warming theory isn't based on "sound science." How long can he pull off this act -- until Coppertone stock splits and New Orleans is underwater?"
Kind of creepy isn't it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 10, 2006 11:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has led to enormous problems in some places in Indonesia, for example, where girls in the camps have been forcibly married off to men in order to make sure they don't marry anyone else, since there are so few women to go round. Abuse of women in these areas became rife.
And some people wonder why these causes get taken up by women? Instead of whingeing yourselves, JOIN them so we can all work together, instead of sitting around and abusing women for, apparently, trying to steal these issues for themselves. Just because YOU didn't think of it in the first place doesn't mean that women can't...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drappleby on Jul 11, 2006 3:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Joe Ox on Jul 11, 2006 10:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DOWN WITH DEATH
DOWN WITH DEATH
DOWN WITH DEATH
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Who Cares? Let's Make Dying Fun, Shall We?
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Who Cares? Let's Make Dying Fun, Shall We?
Posted by: Joe Ox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Burton on Jul 15, 2006 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PS: I am quite serious about this. It pains me to see so much university space wasted on gender based pop-sociology. I'd like to see some real scientific work come out of womyn's studies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coulio on Nov 7, 2006 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coulio on Nov 7, 2006 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 10, 2006 3:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: mazel
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: annm
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» Women have controlled the wealth in this country for decades.
Posted by: fork
» RE: Women have controlled the wealth in this country for decades.
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» Women's wealth control
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Women's wealth control
Posted by: Burton
» RE: Women's wealth control
Posted by: Burton
» Global Warming
Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Global Warming
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Global Warming
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Not Another Gender Issue
Posted by: ann83
» as long as it gets women interested in the issue
Posted by: repo
» Eliminate Most of the Third World Population: Good Idea But Is that What You Want?
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: four_legs_good_two_legs_bad on Jul 10, 2006 4:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for environmentalism and the supposed global warming, I have been on this earth for quite some time. It does not seem any warmer to me. Also, the earth goes through many temperature fluctuations anyway.
Of course it seems logical that more people living a western lifestyle is going to warm the planet through the increased use of energy. So here is a solution --stop immigration into America.
Problem solved. Of course that means rich investors will make less profit because wages would go up. Tough for them. However, the so called progressive faction of America seems closely aligned with the rich and the right wing, and supports more and more immigration despite the costs to the environment.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» God/Nature Are Racists!
Posted by: knocko
» RE: God/Nature Are Racists!
Posted by: MatthewSavage
» Economic Growth Will Not Be Sacrificed For Enviro-Fairy Tales
Posted by: knocko
» RE: both the feminism angle and the environmental angle bore me to tears
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drappleby on Jul 10, 2006 4:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: mazel
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: mazel
» Relax and enjoy the warmth
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: drappleby
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: grokked
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: Ratskii
» RE: Climate Change
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: Ladies, continue to drive your SUV's to the Nail Salon
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Climate Change answers are HERE
Posted by: Drclaw
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Jul 10, 2006 5:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nutrient-poor crops. Submerged beach houses. Tornado warnings in California. Doubled hurricane activity in the gulf. Fewer airplane flights. Increased insect populations. Tropical diseases moving northward. Dead fisheries. Drought. Ground buckling with the loss of permafrost.
Everyone gets effected eventually. Let men sign the treaties to save their own asses; that's more likely to convince tham than worrying about the little old ladies of Bangladesh. Old ladies' lives are just as valuable (if not more so), but the point is getting something done, not grandstanding.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Global Climate Change Not the Biggest Deal for The World
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SBK on Jul 10, 2006 5:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Are Whites the Macro and Asians the Micro and Blacks the Zero?
Posted by: knocko
» RE: Are Whites the Macro and Asians the Micro and Blacks the Zero?
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 10, 2006 11:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the best of my knowledge, the POTUS (and his administration) lacks authority to sign the treaty into law.*
Ratifications of treaties are a matter for Congress.**
*9th grade civics, test 1
**9th grade civics, midterm
Goodness is it ever frustrating when people on the left rush to give the grand poobah more authority than he's already lavished upon himself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ted Kennedy global warming hypocrite
Posted by: knocko
Comments are closed-
Posted by: munchkinpup on Jul 10, 2006 8:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, global warming exists. How many reputable scientists have to yak about this truth before humankind wakes the hell up???!!! Maybe all of you morons won't be around to find out what happens, but your grand-children or great grand children just might have to worry about it!
Why don't all you trolls go find something else to do this summer- like jump into a nice cool polluted lake or river.
Here's some additional reading for your hopeful enlightenment from the year 2001, and David Corn's words prove to be prophetic: "George W. Bush: The Un-Science Guy" By David Corn, June 19, 2001
"George W. claims that global warming theory isn't based on "sound science." How long can he pull off this act -- until Coppertone stock splits and New Orleans is underwater?"
Kind of creepy isn't it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: None So Blind...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 10, 2006 11:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has led to enormous problems in some places in Indonesia, for example, where girls in the camps have been forcibly married off to men in order to make sure they don't marry anyone else, since there are so few women to go round. Abuse of women in these areas became rife.
And some people wonder why these causes get taken up by women? Instead of whingeing yourselves, JOIN them so we can all work together, instead of sitting around and abusing women for, apparently, trying to steal these issues for themselves. Just because YOU didn't think of it in the first place doesn't mean that women can't...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drappleby on Jul 11, 2006 3:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Joe Ox on Jul 11, 2006 10:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DOWN WITH DEATH
DOWN WITH DEATH
DOWN WITH DEATH
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Who Cares? Let's Make Dying Fun, Shall We?
Posted by: coldeye
» RE: Who Cares? Let's Make Dying Fun, Shall We?
Posted by: Joe Ox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Burton on Jul 15, 2006 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PS: I am quite serious about this. It pains me to see so much university space wasted on gender based pop-sociology. I'd like to see some real scientific work come out of womyn's studies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coulio on Nov 7, 2006 7:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coulio on Nov 7, 2006 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




