Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bringing a Living Wage to the Farm

By John Feffer, AlterNet. Posted July 12, 2006.


A few courageous individuals who want Americans to radically rethink the food on their plates are trying to boost farmworker wages.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by John Feffer

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Poverty wages for farmworkers were the problem. As Dick Nogaj figured it, blueberries were the answer. On vacation in southwest Florida in 1997, Nogaj and his wife Florence heard about a hunger strike by migrant workers in Immokalee, an agricultural town 35 miles inland from Ft. Myers. The Nogajs immediately drove to Immokalee. They were appalled at how hard the tomato and citrus pickers worked and how little they got in return. The average farmworker in the area, according to researchers at the University of Florida, brings home from the fields an annual income of between $6,500 and $7,000.

To boost these wages, Dick Nogaj put his faith in consumers. "We can end poverty in the agricultural sector if only 10 percent of the public pays 10 percent more for their food," he says. That's where blueberries entered the picture. The market for the anti-oxidant-rich fruit was growing, particularly among Florida retirees. A variety capable of prospering in south Florida would allow Nogaj to dominate the market for at least a month and possibly two, between the fading of Chilean imports and the ripening of more northern varieties. Higher prices for spring blueberries could translate into higher wages for farmworkers.

In 1999, having recently sold his Illinois engineering firm to its employees, Nogaj invested millions of dollars to turn 36 acres of Immokalee's sandy soil into a blueberry farm. He took a risk on a new variety developed by University of Florida researchers. He waited two seasons before harvesting the first crop.

These "leaps of faith" were motivated by Nogaj's experience with Habitat for Humanity and a personal philosophy that is equal parts progressive Christianity and solid Midwestern liberalism. Today, he boasts of paying his workers $8.50 an hour, two dollars above Florida's minimum wage, and his piece-rate pickers as much as $12 to $14 an hour. Nogaj thinks his blueberries, on sale at Whole Foods and other outlets, represent a new model for agriculture in Florida and nationwide.

Yet much has changed betwixt blueprint and blueberries. Nogaj had high hopes for federal legislation to provide tax incentives for growers who paid living wages. "But then, 30 days after our visit to Washington, Sept. 11 happened, and we haven't gotten an audience in Congress since," he laments.

The problems were not just legislative. It was initially difficult to get the mix of soil right for the finicky berries. Last fall, Hurricane Wilma uprooted 10,000 bushes and swept away critically important surface soil.

Then there's been the price of land. The area between the Gulf of Mexico and the Everglades has become hot property. The congested two-lane highway from the Ft. Myers airport to Immokalee is lined with "For Sale" signs and construction crews plotting out subdivisions. Soon 20,000 people will move into Ave Maria, an abortion-free development southwest of Immokalee that will encircle the new Catholic university funded by the Dominos pizza fortune.

As a result, Nogaj's blueberry farm is now on top of real estate worth five times its original price. "The farm is no longer saleable as a farm," Nogaj says. "As developable land, its value exceeds the value of farm property." If California's past is Florida's future, Nogaj's blueberry farm may live on only in the name of a future gated community.

In the meantime, though, southwest Florida remains the winter produce capital of the United States, and someone has to pick all those tomatoes and oranges. Dick Nogaj believes that informed consumers will reach out a hand to pull farmworkers out of poverty. Other living-wage efforts focus on the growers or the farmworkers themselves.

Living-wage campaigns have succeeded in putting more money in workers' pockets in 135 cities and counties across America. With rates of unionization stagnant, the federal minimum wage at its second lowest value since 1955, and global competition pressing down salaries, activists have employed creative tactics to end poverty for working people. Bringing a living wage to rural America, however, faces additional obstacles, such as a migrant labor force and legal prohibitions against unionizing on farms.

Unless proposed federal immigration legislation radically restricts the available work force, boosting farmworker wages will fall on the shoulders of a few courageous organizations and individuals who want Americans to radically rethink the food on their plates.

Dirty little secret

Immokalee was the dirty little secret exposed in Edward R. Murrow's famous 1960 "Harvest of Shame" documentary about the conditions for American farmworkers. Mexican, Guatemalan and Haitian workers have largely replaced the African-Americans of Murrow's documentary, but otherwise not a great deal has changed. The two-bedroom trailers that dot the streets on either side of the town's main drag might house as many as a dozen migrants each. In Florida courts over the last seven years, prosecutors have successfully argued six cases of modern-day slavery affecting over 1,000 farmworkers.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

John Feffer is co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Most People are Oblivious
Posted by: bttl on Jul 12, 2006 3:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most Americans just want to get cheap food. It's not that they can't afford more; somehow they manage to shell out the bucks for cell phones, SUV's, wide screen TV's, ipods and the like. But when it comes to food, the cheaper the better. And as this mostly translates into poverty for the underclass that works the farms, most of whom have no voice, well, so what??

The depressed wages that are paid on these farms to migrant workers as well as the low wages paid in places like Mexico and Central and South America then keep prices low for food here in the US as farms cannot afford to pay more here in the US or they cannot price competitively.

I used to farm full-time. I now farm part-time. I cannot earn a liveable wage farming or charge enough to cover my costs and provide any profit on top of it. I am competing for my produce with the prices set by low wagepayers elsewhere.
Customers don't want to pay $6 for strawberries if they can get it for $4 at a chain store supermarket that imports it.

The problem is that this is not something that gets very many Americans excited; food still shows up at the store and they can afford it so who cares...... It becomes a "moral imperative" and only a small fraction of people care about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Most People are Oblivious Posted by: citrusgirl
Americans Are Just Plain Cheap Sheeple
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 12, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless it's something marketed as being the most hip, trendy and cool thing, Americans have shown over and over that they will take good enough to save a nickel. For every person that will pay for quality there are probably 20 who wouldn't to save their life. When issues like a living wage or social justice are involved the margin is undoubtedly greater.

The American culture is one that has long been driven and defined by greed. From slavery to the current illegal migrant debate the bottom line is the only thing thing that really matters-- the ultimate trump card. Americans celebrate greed and the desire seems greater every year. The end result is an ever colder, disjointed and harsh society.

I will gladly pay a premium for a superior product or service as long as the price is reasonable. Even in natural foods, greed is there. Despite the higher price, many retailers refuse to share the wealth with those who make it possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: YOU Are Just Plain CYNICAL Posted by: GREGORYABUTLER
costs vs benefits
Posted by: Drclaw on Jul 12, 2006 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps its shortsightedness and greed that prevents consumers (and owners, sellers) from looking at anything but the immediate bottom line. This is, after all, the prevailing model of our economy. On the other hand, one of the problems I see is that true costs and benefits are not always reflected in the sale price because of the "incentives" (short term, mostly) built into our system. The best thing we can do is to argue the benefits of paying a little bit more. Some are reflected in this article; paying a decent wage preserves local agriculture and makes us less dependent on foreign sources. It maintains communities, it reduces the cost of governmental services that we all chip in to support, it frequently represents a more sustainable and environmentally sound farming practice by defeating the race to the bottom. There are hidden costs when the above are deemphasized, but they are costs we pay for all the same.

CHeck out community sponsored agriculture (CSA's) in your area. We are in one, and we pay a share directly to a small family owned farm. They gain security, and we the knowledge that our money (yes, somewhat more than going to our local chain store) goes to support sustainable and ethical practices. Transportation costs are reduced, we support our local community. The food is better, and we identify more with the process. And yes, I live in a big city-its not restricted to rural areas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seeds of hope
Posted by: knitter on Jul 12, 2006 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Planting the seeds of good ideas and giving them room to grow (perhaps by not selling the blueberry farm to developers) is the way to live in hope and actively work toward living wages for agricultural workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let the market set the wage
Posted by: Lefty Fukwitz on Jul 12, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's going to anyway regardless of what anyone says or does. That's called capitalism and it feeds people. Setting "living wages" is called communism and under that plan people starve. It doesn't bother me that migrant workers can not afford my house payment or a big screen tv. Once upon a time I couldn't either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're not asking ME ... but
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jul 12, 2006 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I'd rather buy Union-labeled 'fair wage' produce at a premium price than 'FDA Organic' at a similar premium.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LEFT WING TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS
Posted by: GREGORYABUTLER on Jul 12, 2006 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry, but if the goal is to raise wages for farm workers, then need to go on strike and FORCE the farmers and the farm labor contractors to pay higher wages..

Paying higher consumer prices will merely put more money in the bosses pockets...

And, as I HOPE we all know, more money for bosses NEVER translates into higher wages for workers... That's the Ronald Reagan "trickle down economics" theory, and we all know that's a lie...

Which makes me ask an ugly question... why exactly are farm labor advocates calling for higher prices for farm bosses???

That's really odd, if you think about it (or really class collaborationist)

Beyond that, higher prices for fresh fruit will be yet another hardship on the American working class, most of whom are already living paycheck to paycheck...

Here's an idea, let the farm bosses pay for the raise OUT OF THEIR OWN POCKETS...

After all, they already charge sky high prices for produce ($ 3.99 for a pint of blueberries) and we know that the farm workers only see a few pennies of it...

In other words, farm workers need class struggle, not trickle down economics charity...

GREGORY BUTLER
GREGORYABUTLER@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where do farm subsidies fit in to this? Transport costs?
Posted by: wisewarren on Jul 13, 2006 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read references to the massive amounts of subsidies the US government provides for certain kinds of farming. So where do our tax dollars go, that the people who work on the farms don't get paid better? And why do tomatoes that travel thousands of miles still cost less than tomatoes picked inside the state where they are bought? Too many corporations are on both sides of the borders, and want to keep workers' pay below the poverty line everywhere, not just here in Florida. Missing also from the equation--if we, the consumers, pay more, so that they, the workers, have more, then they, the workers, can also spend more, in our local communities. In the case of migrant workers, poverty is linked to health, early births (often premature), untreated injuries and illnesses, and so on. When migrants collapse and need care, they end up in the county hospitals. And, their children really should attend our county schools. If they need the police or fire department or the library, they should have the same access everyone else does. Not paying them a living wage means that they partake inadequately of these systems, and are unable to pay for the smaller than needed portion they take. Paying a living wage would make it possible to ease the tax burden on the non-farmworkers, although that would be offset by the increased grocery costs. But it should be possible to design and implement systems where the net gains of better pay are preserved in a better functioning social structure for their communities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]