Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Top 10 Power Brokers of the Religious Right

By Rob Boston, Church and State. Posted July 7, 2006.


Who they are, what they want, and why these American ayatollahs must be stopped.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rob Boston

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The United States is home to dozens of Religious Right groups. Many have small budgets and focus on state and local issues; the most powerful organizations conduct nationwide operations, command multi-million-dollar bank accounts and attract millions of followers. They have disproportionate clout in the halls of Congress, the White House and the courts, and they wield enormous influence within the political system.

What follows is a list of the nation’s Top Ten Religious Right groups, as determined by publicly available financial data and political prominence. Additional information describes the organizations’ leaders, funding and activities.

1. Christian Broadcasting Network
Founder, CEO and Director:  The Rev. Pat Robertson
2004 Revenue: $186,482,060
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Web site: www.cbn.com

Overview: The Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) airs Robertson’s “700 Club,” an incendiary daily mix of Pentecostal faith-healing, lifestyle advice and far-right politics. He calls church-state separation a “lie of the left” and thinks Christians like him should lead the world. With his withdrawal from the Christian Coalition in 2001, Robertson uses CBN as his primary political soapbox. The show, which according to Nielsen Media Research has 830,000 daily viewers, opens with a “newscast” that parrots Robertson’s views, often followed by commentary from the televangelist himself. Top leaders of the conservative movement regularly pontificate on the program, and Republican members of Congress appear to tout legislative goals.

Robertson, 76, has a history of controversy. His 1991 book The New World Order was based on a host of anti-Semitic sources, although Robertson has always been pro-Israel for end-times theological reasons. The same book opines that former presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush may have been unwitting dupes for Lucifer. On his TV show, Robertson once charged that Methodists, Presbyterians and Episcopalians represent “the spirit of the Antichrist.” In a Sept. 13, 2001, diatribe, he asserted that the terrorist attacks on America happened because of the Supreme Court’s rulings in favor of church-state separation. In the ensuing controversy, Robertson shifted the blame to Jerry Falwell, who had been on the show with him.

Over the years, the failed presidential candidate has often dallied with brutal dictators. He celebrated Guatemala’s Pentecostal strongman Efrain Rios Montt, lauded Frederick Chiluba of Zambia as a model for American politicians, hunted for gold with Liberia’s Charles Taylor and did business with Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire. (He was caught using relief airplanes owned by his charity, Operation Blessing, to ferry diamond-mining equipment in and out of Zaire.)

Despite all of this, Robertson retains a close relationship with the Republican Party establishment. Operation Blessing has received $1.5 million in taxpayer funding through the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.

CBN is Robertson’s flagship tax-exempt operation. He also founded and runs the American Center for Law and Justice, a Religious Right legal group (see below); Operation Blessing and Regent University, a school offering degrees in law, business, journalism, theology and other disciplines. Added up, Robertson-related groups brought in $461,475,115 in tax-free donations in 2004.

Robertson Quote: “The fact that [the courts] are trying to ignore this country’s religious heritage is just horrible. They are taking our religion away from us under the guise of separation of church and state. There was never any intention that our government would be separate from God Almighty. Never, never, never in the history of this land did the founders of this country or those who came after them think that was the case.” (“700 Club,” July 19, 2005)

2. Focus on the Family

Founder and chairman: Dr. James C. Dobson
2005 Revenue: $137,848,520
Location: Colorado Springs, Colo.
Web site: www.family.org

Overview: Although sometimes mistakenly identified as a minister, James Dobson is a child psychologist who founded Focus on the Family in 1977. Dobson, 70, rose to national prominence after the release of his first book, Dare to Discipline, a controversial volume that lauded corporal punishment for children at a time when many child-rearing experts were recommending against it. He came to the attention of aides to President Ronald Reagan and during the 1980s served on various White House commissions, including a 1985-86 stint on Attorney General Edwin Meese’s Commission on Pornography.

From modest origins, FOF has expanded into a huge ministry with a worldwide presence. Dobson’s radio broadcasts are heard daily by an estimated five million Americans. According to its Web site, “Focus on the Family has…become an international organization with more than 74 different ministries requiring nearly 1,300 employees” with a “daily broadcast heard on over 6,000 facilities worldwide.” FOF produces 10 magazines that are mailed to 2.3 million people and responds to as many as 55,000 letters per week. The ministry also produces various DVDs, books, pamphlets and other materials. It has political affiliates in 32 states that lobby and monitor state legislation.


Digg!

Lauren Smith, Americans United communications assistant, provided research for this article.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thanks for this article
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 7, 2006 12:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am going to send it around to other Aussies so we can better identify exactly why it is we are so f*cken frightened of your dangerous, freaky, psychotic country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: Rolomax
» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: leilalw
» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: jonwilson
» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Thanks for this article Posted by: boardsailor
» Show me the money Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Show me the money Posted by: ellarwee
» RE: Show me the money Posted by: bronco214
» RE: Show me the money Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Show me the money Posted by: Tholos
» RE: Show me the money Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: eal Men Aren't Frightened Posted by: skinsinfilms
» We're not all like that Posted by: tanstaafl28
» "By their fruits ..." etc. Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: We're not all like that Posted by: Aussie Kim
Pharisees
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Jul 7, 2006 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pharisees and false prophets, all of them. This is a rogues gallery of people who would have stood before the Patrician's Palace along side Caiphas and have shouted, "Crucify him!"

What they are doing to America has nothing to do with either religion or spirituality; it's all politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pharisees Posted by: kww355
» WRONG Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Pharisees were fine people Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Goater Posted by: skinsinfilms
» RE: Pharisees were fine people Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver
» RE: Pharisees Posted by: MEL810
» RE: Pharisees, No Whore Church Posted by: CovertRage
from a Christian of the left
Posted by: wawa on Jul 7, 2006 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most revolutionary minded of our visionary founding fathers was the radical writer, Tom Paine. With flaming hopes and a vision of a new world, compelled by a spirit and determination and persistence to resist the British occupation, Paine devoted himself to the expression of what became the United States of American. A failure at everything until he published "Common Sense" which emboldened immigrants to become compatriots and rise up in rebellion in the name of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which birthed a nation where democracy is still being defined.

“Soon after I had published the pamphlet Common Sense, [Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion… The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.”-Tom Paine

May THAT revolution resume...


-excerpted from 7/5/06 WAWA BLOG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» From the left Posted by: russianblue1
» Founding Fathers faith Posted by: nadezhda
Clerical Fascism
Posted by: Citizendeane on Jul 7, 2006 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clerical fascists do not want to run the state or be part of it. They want to keep order in a society that is run by fascists, hence they want support from and give support to fascist regimes and movements. These fundamentalists do not want a theocracy or a theocratic state. They want a fascist -secular-state which understands that it needs their support. That is why they love the ultra right--- the ultra right is fascist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clerical Fascism Posted by: nim1
A Sucker Born Every Minute
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jul 7, 2006 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this list of "religious" organizations is more like reading a list of fascist organizations. They all have the same theme; we know who God is and what the Bible means and will protect you from the hords of those other "evil" people who are trying to take them away. I am not sure which is more sad and pathetic, those who promote themselves as religious leaders but are only after their own self serving power needs or those who follow them and lose their own soul. But again it is simply a matter of the Barnum and Bailey circus show creed "There is a sucker born every mintue."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Sucker Born Every Minute sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: A Sucker Born Every Minute Posted by: lively56
» RE: A Sucker Born Every Minute Posted by: jonwilson
» RE: A Sucker Born Every Minute Posted by: aussidawg
» Strike Three Posted by: knocko
» RE: Strike Three Posted by: hms2004
» RE: Strike Three Posted by: peacefulaim
» RE: Strike Three Posted by: aussidawg
» No Answer Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: No Answer Posted by: maribelle
» RE: No Answer Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: A Sucker Born Every Minute Posted by: walterik
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 7, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a longtime history buff and political junkie, I believe Jesus was a flaming liberal and he was also a firm believer in separation of church and state. His "Render unto Caeser" answer the heckler shows that clearly

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: brunowe
beyond my understanding
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 7, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How millions of people can believe these prancing, yelping fools is a matter completely beyond my understianding. I can't stand to listen to any of them for more than a few minutes before throwing my hands up in disgust and even wondering if they can really be human.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Troll methodology. . . Posted by: peacefulaim
» RE: Troll methodology. . . Posted by: russianblue1
» opening debate Posted by: nadezhda
Who's behind religious right
Posted by: Jenny on Jul 7, 2006 4:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many of these "power brokers" are only power brokers because of Rev. Moon's money. Moon put Judge Moore into office through Kennedy and Coral Ridge and others. The question is: "Who's behind Rev. Moon?" See Robert Parry's articles, and Larry Hecht's articles "The "No Soul" gang behind Reverend Moon . . . "
Also, what Moon sponsored NGO put 10,000 copies of the video "George W. Bush: Faith in the White House" in churches across the nation before his last election?

Delamer Duverus

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who's behind religious right Posted by: lydia cypher
Forgot thier king of kings, Satan
Posted by: enzolima on Jul 7, 2006 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great stuff. Now if only somehow they couyld all go away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» darned Jefferson Posted by: knocko
» RE: darned Jefferson Posted by: aussidawg
LET'S KEEP THE INFIGHTING TO A MINIMUM.
Posted by: ssegallmd on Jul 7, 2006 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been several Alternet articles over the last year or two on the political aspects of American religion, none of which is very encouraging just like this one. And the Alternet posting community, like most, is a mix of believers and other kinds of people as well, including atheists and agnostics.

This latter group of nonbelievers (to which I also belong) along with liberal Christians is outraged by political Christianity and its anti-Americanism implications. As the article above illustrates, the dominant entities in political Christianity support the Republican party, and they do this with tax exempt dollars, all of which liberals, especially nontheists, resent. So, there is a lot of antipathy for Christianity here as the posts above and those to follow will no doubt validate.

Some of the negativity expressed will not be just about conservative political Christianity, but also toward religion and faith in a general sense. Here, the anger has been shifted from the Christian leadership to its membership for empowering them.

Now what about the poor liberal Christian who also supports the principles of Americanism (separation of church and state, egalitarianism, democracy, diversity, tolerance, freedom to live as one chooses, etc.) and reads about all of the hatred many liberals have for organized religion and its political aspirations? Many will take it personally and defend their faith unnecessarily, and we will begin squabbling unnecessarily.

But with regard to the posts that criticize faith and its consequences, many of which I have written myself in the past, the liberal Christian will also feel assaulted, but this time he/she is justified in objecting as I have come to understand. It really is none of my business what you believe, just what you do if it affects me.

Unfortunately, these liberal Christians also sometimes cross a line if their defense of their faith turns into proselytizing. This is inappropriate, too, as few of us are interested. This is not a religious forum, but a political one that occasionally explores religion’s impact on politics.

I want to apologize for my past offenses in this area. I admit that I don’t see any merit in faith, and its dangers are vast and apparent. But I was just as wrong to make it an issue here or to preach secularism.

I implore my fellow nonbelievers to consider these ideas and choose your topics and words accordingly and with the understanding that many liberal Christians are people of faith, but that they respect the same principle for as we do with regard to how their religion should be legal entitled to affect us, namely, that faith should be a private matter and not politicized, that people should be free to enjoy freedom FROM religion.

And Christians, please, don’t be personally offended by attacks on conservative political Christianity. Those are not directed at you.

I suggest that we keep it political and avoid theological considerations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NC3's poor upbringing Posted by: russianblue1
» Just because you ask. Posted by: mokidugway
» GOOD POST, MOKIDUGWAY Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: GOOD POST, MOKIDUGWAY Posted by: mokidugway
» Universist Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Universist Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Universist Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Universist Posted by: Joe Ox
» Thank you Posted by: nadezhda
So what's next?
Posted by: kimaszi on Jul 7, 2006 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article, Americans United folks. so... how the hell did they amass so much money, anyway? the standard "the christian right created direct mail" story? how do we cut them off from the cash? got any plans to dismantle W's faith-based funding program? Investigating these organizations for the kind of corruption we've come to expect from the u.s. right? your website looks like the usual progressive-left build locally, etc. action plan, which is fine, but are you making coalitions with other progressive groups, esp other groups that are constantly under attack from these top 10? and what about (previous commenters will gasp) getting together with the "spiritual progressives"? they are actually FOR separation of church and state, if you look at their practice and proposed policy.

i'm suggesting separation of church and state *sounds like* a special issue. It sounds like it's anti-religion, even though it's not--but the religious right thrives on that, here in the not-very-secular u.s. What about some better framing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So what's next? Posted by: hms2004
» RE: So what's next? Posted by: ccrider27
» I have an idea. Posted by: Lauren
TROLLS BEGONE!
Posted by: ssegallmd on Jul 7, 2006 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's another example of some fine conservative input. It is such an honor to get a visit from the other side and to be schooled by one of them. I learned so much, and my thinking has been radically altered as a result of this post.

Previously, I was encumbered by the notion that when one wrote or spoke about something, one should have a point. Clearly, as this piece of insight illustrates, that’s too rigid.

And I was also suffering from the delusion (of which I have now gratefully become disabused thanks to this insightful post) that the subject was conservative religious politics. Instead, we’re taking gratuitous pokes at Soros, Teresa and John Kerry, and Barbara Streissand. I also previously thought that one should not only have a point, it should be related the topic at hand.

But apparently I was mistaken. And it's a good thing too or else we wouldn't have this fine conservative mind's valuable and cogent contribution. All I can say is, “Ditto, Rush! No, make it mega-dittoes”.

Who is assigning these trolls to do so much posting of agitprop on this site of late?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Enter, Oh Mighty Gandolf Posted by: knocko
» RE: nter, Oh Mighty Gandolf Posted by: aebartle
» RE: TROLLS BEGONE! Posted by: mombot
» RE: TROLLS BEGONE! Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: TROLLS BEGONE! Posted by: peacefulaim
» YES, they are paid!! Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: TROLLS BEGONE! Posted by: sirossisofliver
» What Do You Want Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: What Do You Want Posted by: ssegallmd
Ayatollahs are in Iran not in America
Posted by: knocko on Jul 7, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The connotation of ayatollah to describe certain Christians in American politics is defamatory. the term refers to Iran religious leaders who simultaneously serve as dictators in a totalitarian state. the analogy simply doesn't apply to the US. Read any series of newspaper articles or the several excellent Iranian novels by women that have been acclimed by critics in the West, and it's obvious that the author of this post is exercising irresponsible hyperbole and character assasination. Real ayatollahs murder, start wars, enslave women, persectue religious minorties by jail and torture, and totally infuse the entire education system with religious oversight. Not a single person cited in your top Ten even comes clothers to an objective version of an Iranian "ayatollah". Joe Mc
Carthy never came close to the smear of religion and of conservatives that the secular hard left commits in the US of today. McCarthy never had the media in his pocket the way the Left has gullible readers and young people thinking that religion=Fascism.

Keep it up. It will just keep exarcerbating the chasm between opposing poles in American life. You really do not want to get into a shoot-out with the Right. But that is where Left is heading. And it always loses shoot-outs. (Poor Rosa Luxembourg).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Comrade Winston Posted by: knocko
» RE: Comrade Winston Posted by: drone
» Ayatolla you so! Posted by: ssegallmd
» Key difference. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Liberal Ayatollahs Posted by: knocko
» RE: Liberal Ayatollahs Posted by: mombot
» You just proved our point Posted by: SufiLizard
» RE: You just proved our point Posted by: jonwilson
» Give yourself to love... Posted by: buffeliscious
» 'Let's Assassinate Hugo Chavez' Posted by: DavidTbone
» Amen Posted by: DavidTbone
» By the way Posted by: DavidTbone
» Don't start wars? Don't subjugate women? Posted by: chief of okeefe
Timely article on what to watch for
Posted by: sausage on Jul 7, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is anything in common with the ten organizations it is that all have a decidedlyDominionist Christian slant. The hoped for result of all this lobbying, proselytizing, propaganda and down right lying is the foundation of a theocractic government in Washington, D.C.

As of this writing they are very close to their goal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Live and Let Live Posted by: knocko
» CORRECT 100% Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Live and Let Live Posted by: peacefulaim
» Well stay tired of it Posted by: Joe Ox
» RE: Well stay tired of it Posted by: buffeliscious
Opportunity Abounds
Posted by: Urstrly on Jul 7, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking at the numbers, it's clear someone besides little old ladies has an interest in this kind of religion. Why does the right find it a good investment? It keeps people "in their place," docile, hoping for better things in the next life, and pointing their fingers at some imagined villain—gays, Jews, abortion providers, blacks, immigrants, you name it.

But what does the left offer? We barely mention that separation of church and state protects THEM from overbearing religion. Nor do mainstream and liberal religions acknowledge the real spiritual emptiness of our culture. If you can't afford medical care and groceries at the same time, if you can't send your kids to private school, if you don't have a ride to church or nice clothes to wear there, religious freedom is only an abstraction. We need to make it real, to publicize the line between corporate and government repression and the religious right . Most of all, we need to offer the kind of spiritual sustenance that comes from acknowledging each and every person as a child of God. Until we do, the religious right will go on attracting the poor and the oppressed and the depressed. Maybe we're too comfortable with the way things are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Roman Holiday Posted by: knocko
» RE: Opportunity Abounds Posted by: babs
Wolf Pack
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 7, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jesus, the expert on Christianity, warned his followers that people would enter the church for purposes that had nothing to do with extending his ministry. He said that they would appear as sheep but were like ravenous wolves. The people and groups mentioned in this listing are among those Jesus warned about.

These people/groups are not about extending grace, mercy & peace to all of the world. These people/groups do not concern themselves with the widow, the orphan, the sick, the imprisoned and the outcast. These people/groups are not motivated by a love for people and a desire to see all people freed from the chains that bind them. What they are about is power, political influence and money.

These modern day Pharisees are about conforming people to a list of do's and don't that suit their personal bias. Jesus was harsh with the Pharisees because they were all about burdening people with a formulary of conduct rather than reaching out to their real needs. He called them 'whitewashed tombstones'-- people who desired to publicly appear religious and pious, but inside were greedy, hard-hearted and bound to their own corruption.

Christ-followers are not about binding people up with lists of do's and don'ts. They are not about playing in the political cesspool and do not seek to establish a theocracy.

What Christ-followers are about is very simple: loving God and all people as you love yourself. If you do that you will live peacefully, extend mercy and grace to others and strive to see all people free. The clowns of the christian media & political influence circus are about everything but that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jesus Nazerethsky Posted by: knocko
» Hey knocko Posted by: NC3
» RE: Hey knocko Posted by: peacefulaim
» I'm here buddy Posted by: knocko
» RE: Jesus Nazerethsky Posted by: NoPCZone
» Sheeple Posted by: NC3
» RE: Wolf Pack Posted by: Albertagirl
WHAT WOULD JESUS DO WITH ALL THAT MONEY ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 7, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Countless Christian organizations have incomprehensible amounts of money. Do they run soup kithchens, shelters, hospitals or anything to improve the human condition? Not that I know of. They continue to amass fortunes. Make sizable donations to politicians and no questions asked. Not even by the IRS. It's time to take a look at these "non-profit" organizations. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Invest in Love Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: Invest in Love Posted by: CovertRage
"Ah Blieve"
Posted by: symcokid on Jul 7, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since I was quite young, I would hear at our church how the world could come to an end at any moment - be ready for the coming. Hallalujah! Jack Van Impe and his Queen make that declaration every few minutes during his comedy routine. Praise the Lord!

There have been established Churches here for some time but now they've become as numerous as convenience stores with very minimum - no taxes. They all have the "Real Deal"! "What's in your wallet"? Every few years, the Zealots feel it neccessary to "Paraphrase" the Bible.

If people wish to follow any of these Religious Sects, fine, but can't Church and State be kept separate as was originally intended. Politics is corrupt enough without "Onward Christian Soldier, Marching as to War" and "Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition" rhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» (sigh) You really don't get it. Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» Okay... Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
Despite these huge presences in Virginia
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 7, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a lot of exurbs and suburbs including VA Beach don't always stay Republican. Even as the Religious Right's favorite Jerry KILgore tried unsuccessfully last year to pull another "Kansas", the voters made it clear that they've had enough. I'm not saying that VA will turn blue in 2008 as a result of Kaine's victory but the failures of the Religious Right are home to roost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There IS A Reason...
Posted by: xbj on Jul 7, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There IS a reason that Jesus Christ, throughout His entire life, ran just as far away from politics as was humanly (and sometimes inhumanly) possible, despite all sorts of traps and tricks people laid out for Him to fall into politics, and that reason is simple.

Because real Christians are to follow His life example, to the Cross if necessary. There is no doubt whatsoever that Jesus could, and would have, done politics better than anyone, but POLITICS IS NOT, NOR HAS IT EVER BEEN, A PLACE FOR REAL CHRISTIANS.

Indeed, entering politics BEYOND the simple crying out of the Truth, loud and long, is the first step toward Christianism, a complete perversion of real Christianity.

Each of the misled lost people in this article, as the majority of the misled lost people in their organizations, have become full-fledged Christianists. In Jesus Christ's time He called them Pharisees, hypocrites, "professionally" "religious" Jews that had all the knowledge of the Law and NONE OF THE SUBSTANCE, living only for the power and riches such a life brought them.

Christianists are "professional" Christians; their very livelihood depends on them remaining Christianists; if they were true followers of Christ, they'd GIVE EVERYTHING AWAY and STOP ASKING FOR ANYTHING OF ANYBODY, EVE