comments_image -

HIGHTOWER: Industry "Modernizes" the FDA

Hightower writes: "Whether on toothpaste or breakfast cereal, you can bet that when a 'New and Improved!' label appears on a package, it means you'll pay more and get less ... Likewise comes the 'FDA Modernization Act of 1997' -- a twisted bit of legislation that 'modernizes' the Food & Drug Administration's consumer-protection regulations about like a tornado modernizes a trailer park."
April 26, 2000  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Whether on toothpaste or breakfast cereal, you can bet that when a "New and Improved!" label appears on a package, it means you'll pay more and get less. Congress has learned this art of deceptive packaging, too. Hence, Newt Gingrich's 1995 proposal for a new tax giveaway to the privileged was labeled the "Job Creation Act." Likewise comes the "FDA Modernization Act of 1997" -- a twisted bit of legislation that "modernizes" the Food & Drug Administration's consumer-protection regulations about like a tornado modernizes a trailer park. This bill was not even written by a member of congress. Instead, it's primarily the product of lobbyists for the giant manufacturers of drugs and medical devices. The industry put up $34 million in campaign contributions and, in turn, the Republican leadership of congress allowed the lobbyists to [quote] "modernize" the laws regulating their own industry. No consumers were allowed to participate in this rewrite ... and no public hearings were held. The Health Research Group of Public Citizen, a consumer watchdog organization, looked into it and found these uglies written into the new law: * Instead of the FDA reviewing safety claims of a medical device, now the manufacturer can select and hire its own private tester -- a brother-in-law deal if I ever saw one! * Also, it used to be that at least two clinical investigations were necessary to OK a drug's effectiveness and safety; now, only one is required. * The industry re-write also says that keeping track of the performance of heart valves and other high-risk medical devices is now optional, rather than mandatory. * Finally, the new law tilts the regulatory process itself against us consumers and patients. This is Jim Hightower saying ... To learn more about this regulatory gut job, call Public Citizen's Health Research Group: 202-588-1000. Source: "Bill Clinton's Bloody Hands." Worst Pills, Best Pills from Public Citizen Health Research Group: January 1998.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Email
Print
submit to reddit
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Obama and Targeted Assassinations: Had Secret Kill List, Said Killing American-Born Cleric an "Easy Decision"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Romney Excuse for Birther Trump Endorsement: I'm Running for Office and I Wanna Win!

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Women's Center In New Orleans Destroyed By Arson, Third Incident in the South

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
US Productivity Up, Wages Stagnant

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reach US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
Thousands Protest Anti-Gay Pastor In North Carolina

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
Bad Company for Mitt: Trump, Newt, and Now Meg Whitman

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
Battle of the Dems: Blue Dog Spends $1.25 Mil of Own Dough Trying to Defeat Progressive in CA Congressional Primary

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Electoral Map Big Picture: If We Win This One, the GOP Fever Might Break

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]