Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Progressives: Stop Waiting for a Hero

By Rev. Jim Rigby, Huffington Post. Posted July 4, 2006.


Leaders can only take you so far. At some point it's up to the people to govern themselves.
070406_story1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rev. Jim Rigby

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As we get closer to the presidential elections, a conversation will be heard all across America. "Who can liberals choose that will save this country? Is he the one, or is it her?" Lists are being compiled and a debate held over which of the names is America's savior.

For liberals, the correct answer is "none of the above."

I say this without knowing who will be the nominee. I say this not because the individuals in question are inadequate. I say this because progressive values cannot be saved by heroes. Progressive values can only be saved by ordinary citizens living up to their principles.

In the biblical story of the Exodus, Moses dies just before Israel can enter the Promised Land. The story is told as a way of making a point. Leaders can only take you so far. At some point it's up to the people to govern themselves. Eugene B. Debs used to tell his listeners, "I would not lead you into the promised land even if I could, for, if anybody leads you in, someone else can lead you out."

When George W. Bush named his first cabinet I announced from our pulpit that America was going to war. I am no prophet, but I can read the writing on the wall. If you see a robot with guns for hands you can be pretty sure it will not be planting many flowers. A presidential cabinet consisting of corporate lobbyists with ties to oil and weapons makers, but having no ambassadors or diplomats can only produce war and economic rapine.

"President" means someone who presides over the democratic process. That may seem mundane. Often it is. But the flashier title "Commander in Chief" is our leader's title in a time of war. Can anyone imagine Jefferson or Lincoln wearing a jacket and hat emblazoned with "Commander in Chief" as has our current President? When people came to make George Washington king, he put on spectacles so they could see his human frailty. That is what a patriot looks like in a peace-loving democracy.

This President occasionally says he took an oath of office to protect the American people. Actually, he took an oath to protect the constitution. It may not seem as exciting as fighting terrorism, but the day-to-day work of participatory democracy is the life blood of our nation.

The flipside of not having heroes is not having demons either. Liberals must stop fixating on George Bush. Corporations took over America using politicians as sock puppets. It certainly makes a difference who sits in office, but we have not solved our problems if we impeach one of the socks. We must change the system. And the way to do that is from the bottom up.

The Howard Dean campaign suggested how grassroots campaigns can be successful, but liberals must stop focusing on personalities and start focusing on the one thing reactionaries do not have, which is principles. If a future candidate happens to shout in a microphone or cry in public we must not let that disqualify her or him from public service. We are choosing a President, not a stuntman for a Rambo sequel.

The American people have chosen reactionary leaders lately because they show their backbone. True, it is a reptilian backbone, it is cruel, ignorant and selfish, but for most voters a spinal column is a requirement for the job. I would suggest that the backbone of a liberal candidate must be a commitment to improving the human condition.

Progressives must not let ridicule or even political defeat trick them into betraying these values: universal health care, livable wages, civil rights for all people including gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons, reproductive choice for women and a planet governed by people not by corporations, religions or armies.

"But what if those principles cost us the election?" you may ask. We need to remember that the religious right rose to power by losing elections. They ran candidates with very strong views using those elections to identify loyal blocks of voters. They then brokered those voting blocks into swing votes in tight elections. Over time they produced a voter base with unshakable loyalty because they gave people something worth voting for. Lovers of democracy can take back this country the same way.

Bertold Brecht in "The Life of Galileo" has a character say, "Unhappy is a land that breeds no heroes," to which Galileo responds "Unhappy is a land that needs heroes." It is a truism of history that heroes usually lead to war whereas peace and democracy are preserved by an informed and involved citizenry. There is no question about it, America will grow tired of the cruelty and ignorance of the current administration. The only question is whether liberals will be at their posts when she does.

Digg!

The Rev. Jim Rigby is pastor of St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church in Austin, Tex. He can be reached at jrigby0000@aol.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
About time!
Posted by: YinRising on Jul 4, 2006 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leaders have a tendancy of producing followers. It helps them to be leaders.

"When the master governs, the people are hardly aware that he exists.
Next best is the leader who is loved.
Next, one who is feared.
The worst is someone who is dispised...

The master doesn't talk. He acts.
When his work is done, the people say, "Amazing, we did it by ourselves!"
-Tao Te Ching ch.17

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: About time! Posted by: Roverton
» RE: About time! Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Excellent points
Posted by: farhada on Jul 4, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with the US today is that people do not want to take responsibility for anything. The mentality of everything goes has been around and thought by the schools, movies, games, theater for so long that accountability and "taking responsibility for their own life" seems to have disappeared from the vocabulary of the most people not only in the US, but the world.

From education system where parents keep blaming the schools for the laziness of their kids, to people burning themselves on McDonald coffee blaming the company to give them "hot" coffee has created a society in limbo. Everyone is waiting for someone to tell them what to do, to follow a reporter, celebrity or what ever, just look at Reagan and Swartzeneger and their credential to become leaders.

I 100% agree with the quote "sad is the nation who needs heroes".

/Farhad Abdolian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent points Posted by: Evoman
» RE: xcellent points Posted by: funknjunk
» What the People Want Posted by: Steven Wanzell
hope
Posted by: rsaxto on Jul 4, 2006 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no hope at the end of the Bushie tunnel only blood and human body parts. The people must give us hope by flushing the Bushies out of their tunnel of disaster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More hope Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: hope Posted by: sidewinder
Leaders? Who needs 'em?
Posted by: amazin on Jul 4, 2006 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the record of leaders that the human animal has consistently thrown up over the past five millennia, who needs them or the misuse that their existence promotes.

www.justice-publications.com/For_a_better_world.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Leaders? Who needs 'em? Posted by: MyLeftFoot
Right on (almost)
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jul 4, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporations took over America using politicians as sock puppets. It certainly makes a difference who sits in office, but we have not solved our problems if we impeach one of the socks. We must change the system. And the way to do that is from the bottom up.

Rev. Rigby is a trifle unclear. On one hand he says that the politicians are puppets of the corporations and the people must save themselves with grassroots action, on the other he says it makes a difference who sits in the office.

If he'd strike the second part I'd agree completely. We have to change the system and grassroots is the way to go. I invite anybody that agrees with that to consider joining The Lincoln Initiative.

We are a movement not an organization. There are no leaders, no contributions, no registration, no meetings. Each member acts independently. The only unity is the desire for "government of the people, by the people, and for the people".

The strategy of this movement is unique. It is to fight corporate power for control of both political parties. It is to dictate the platforms of the parties. Parties and candidatess are minor considerations. Once we control the platforms then we can decide which candidates are best qualified to carry out the program.

The tactics used are the successful tactics of the labor unions. Make your demands to the people who can grant them. In this case the demands are the issues of the individual members. And the demands are made to both political parties. Back your demands with a show of strength and an "or else". The "or else" in this case is a threat to cast a protest vote for "Honest Abe". The show of strength is the number of members. The more members we have the better the chance for success.

Consider The Lincoln Initiative. This movement is unique. Don't be put off by the lack of effort needed. Our strength is in our number, not the effort of individuals. Click on A new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight on (almost) Posted by: Addison
Reflections on the 4th of July
Posted by: robmikejas on Jul 4, 2006 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today we celebrate the independence of the USA from tyranny and the beginning of the advancement of the greatest country to ever instill in its people the sense of individual liberty and justice and possibility for all. Take time today to read the Constitution, The Declaration of Independence and The Bill of Rights. Remind yourself of what we were and how far we had come toward being a country with Principles and Laws that kept us all free men and women as our founding fathers intended. Although an imperfect society, we were (until Bush) a relatively sane group of humans with mostly compassionate values and strong faith in who we were. It is time now for We the People to take a reality check and begin a from the local to the national reclaiming of our true values and commitments to each other.. Start with familiarising you and your families with these precious, noble documents. And then get to work before it is beyond our power to overthrow these fascist criminals who occupy our hallowed halls of government. May God bless you on your journey.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reflections on the 4th of July Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: eflections on the 4th of July Posted by: TUCKERDISPOSAL
bravo!
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Jul 4, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember Naomi Klein?
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 4, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was leading us to a logo-free world where corporations disappeared and the people ruled. Fast forward six years to today: we are at global war with islamic terrorists, logos, communications strategies and PR are more powerful than they have ever been, corporations may be getting a rough ride, but they are still doing things like they always do things.

What has happened? The left, far from rejecting logos, and modern communications, have actually embraced them with gusto and are getting very rich from it. We see everywhere fair trade logos, ethical this and ethical that: all using corporate logos as they sell us an ethical way of life just as Mcdonalds sold us a life of convenience. Can't beat em, join em I guess!

Naomi sits in her palace on her royalties, a perfect model of leftism in the 21st century: wealthy, media cynical, and hypocritical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Never give a sucker an even break. Posted by: sheeplepeeple
» he who smelt it, dealt it Posted by: sheeplepeeple
» Sorry, not biting. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» If the shoe fits . . Posted by: ssegallmd
» The parties aren't the problem Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: The parties aren't the problem Posted by: Lincoln fan
» In the US, There IS No Left. Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» So right brother! Posted by: Bobsays
Fourth of July
Posted by: the islander on Jul 4, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The clearest, most insightful and perceptive --and thus the most beautiful -- article I have read.
the fire of passion for a new world must spread through us actually living our principles here at the grassroots. It's our job to create a new community of life on earth. It starts with honesty. Honesty is simple but it's not easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fourth of July Posted by: domenico234
But, of course it must be We The People
Posted by: Riverside on Jul 4, 2006 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hats off to Rev Rigby. Now that we have sent up our cheers lets get together and work on first getting united then recapturing that beutiful model of liberty and justice that our wise founders gave to us. This means sacrifice in many ways for us, as well as both patience and perserverance something we have not done well with these past years.

It is not a matter of can we do it, but will we do it? This means petty disputes are set aside and we ALL focus on the same goals. Fussing is best in a free society, so lets get free again, first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amen
Posted by: mnascimento on Jul 4, 2006 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes I think we must have all gone mad, to allow these evil doers to subvert our Constitution and pillage our country and the world.

Thank God that there are many reasonable individuals left among us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes. Values DO Matter
Posted by: mgorsuch on Jul 4, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The conservative politicians know this. Liberal-types who voted for Bush last November know this.

Values trump faces. Values trump programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No more guitar heros!
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 4, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If no one has noticed... politicians are only interested in their own benefit. If you can't benefit them.. and voting for them is not benefit enough... then you have no prayer of getting them to make serious change except out of fear... and even then they will hedge their bets every single time.

What we need more than anything else is to be empowered as individuals and communities. This is what reliance on politicians and the global economy is stealing from us. You want to see changes in the world? Start with your own life. Start with your own community. We simply cannot wait for everything to come from the top down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» start with your own life Posted by: aurora2484
Let's be clear on this
Posted by: LegumeSam on Jul 4, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are plenty of examples of courage out there. We might, for instance, regard the men and women who chose to challenge the Two-Party System by setting up the Green Party as examples of bravery in the face of an Establishment that is universally committed to murder-suicide through neoliberal policy.

The Greens, however, are simply ignored by the "leading progressives," with a helping hand lent by the mass media, or disdained when they become too popular. Thus, for instance, everyone pays attention to primary challenges to Hillary Clinton's Senate run, while ignoring Howie Hawkins.

The problem is that the so-called "leading progressives" have ignored America's genuine examples of courage and decided to set up a "movement" around the careerists in power. The problem is not that we have "leaders," it's that the wrong "leaders" are being pre-selected for us. Given this situation, more examples of the model of "leadership" set by John Kerry are an inevitability.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's be clear on this Posted by: farhada
» RE: Let's be clear on this Posted by: LegumeSam
Liberals To The Rescue?
Posted by: pelle_in_goal on Jul 4, 2006 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Liberal movement in this country has been on life support because it gets nothing but scorn from the already paid for MSM. Liberals are merely polite when election results are siderailed over and over again by the same autocrats who see the democratic process as little more than an biennial inconvenience.

No "liberal" candidate running anywhere in November would even surmise that winning without corporate and megawealthy backing. In fact, according to their voting records in legislatures federal and state -- they aren't really liberals at all. And these same politicians and caretakers for the super-rich are even less "progressive."

The Left in this country should be looking to form a new party of the liberals, progressives, environmentalists, and yes -- the socialists. We can all agree to disagree later. Meanwhile we have the greatest bond of friendship that money can't buy -- a common enemy. A very well-entrenched and powerful one.

Sorry, Reverand "Coach." The guys in the locker room here are huddling around in prayer seldom heard at your congregation." Lord...give us the stength and courage to go out and maim the mofos. Let us go forth to shove their butts up their asses."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liberals To The Rescue? Posted by: Evoman
» RE: Liberals To The Rescue? Posted by: Lincoln fan
The left is breeding the non-community
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 4, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An interesting study came out today in the UK. The UK's population is far more left-wing, more atheist and supportive of public services than the US population, so trends here tell us a lot about the future of the left. The country has been governed for the past nine years by a Labour government.

The study found that, despite the debate being around public services, in the past nine years people no longer believe community solutions are the best way forward. Most people now agree that the best solution to your problems and the best way to grow your wealth and improve your economic situation, has everything to do with individual action, not community action. This is the first time it has tipped to a majorty support for individual action.

This is a consequence of a number of trends. One big part of this is the flood of immigration in the past ten years (the highest rate of immigration in history). This has engendered a society, as exemplified by the muslim community, divided and encouraged to look after itself first. We are becoming more of a defacto apartheid society.

The left-wing government has also been turning over all services to charities and private sector social services companies. This is further fracturing the concept of community action. The left has not spoken out about this because they in turn are getting very wealthy off this, as they become the service provider of choice for the government.

All of this has diminishing returns. In the short-term, it is fine to divide people and to turn goodwill into good business.But over the medium to long term, people start to ask the following questions: why should I help those people? Shouldn't I look after people who look like me? What if, one day, I need the help of the charity that looks after my people? As people become more income insecure, these questions become more stark.

I haven't even begun to discuss the internet in all of this.

We need to be honest about what is going on. And to admit that the right, with its talk of common values, has the platform that connects across these divisions. The left's platform, of endless niche break-up to satisfy the demands of interest groups, while great for business and marketers, is destructive to community action and communities. Those are the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So, basically... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Debs quote
Posted by: elgeck0 on Jul 4, 2006 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The entire Eugene V (not B) Debs quote is worth considering in this context, I think, especially the last phrase:

"I do not want you to follow me or anyone else. If you are looking for a Moses to lead you out of this capitalist wilderness, you will stay right where you are. I would not lead you into the promised land if I could, because if I lead you in, some one else would lead you out. You must use your heads as well as your hands, and get yourself out of your present condition."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tiime to stand up Americans
Posted by: Jackieo on Jul 4, 2006 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do agree with this article in a lot of ways, and I realize that the American people have become quite lazy in their ways, and it does appear as though they want someone to lead them, maybe some do, but the majority do not. They want an honest, truthful person with integrity, in the oval office once and for all. No more pandering to the right or the left, but going directly to the people, letting the people know what is really the agenda. No more secret meetings, just because maybe the people would fall apart, ha - who do they think they are, are they not people? Time for all of us to refresh ourselves with our Constitution and Bill of Rights, our history of which we were founded on. Yes we know now that corporations when given a small portion, only want more and more until they have the whole pie, why did we allow them all to run away from home and set up their own little empire somewhere else for their own benefit, we must have been blinded totally to what was going on. Whomever is left in this great land of ours, we must pull together to totally change the sysem as it stands (today) or we all will be toast, thanks for letting me share and I am willing to do my part.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why? One word: Greed Posted by: OranMor
» RE: Why? One word: Greed Posted by: Evoman
» Amen, bro Posted by: Addison
WE HAVE MET OUR HEROES...
Posted by: Roverton on Jul 4, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they are US!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gramps
Posted by: gramps on Jul 4, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Mad Hatters
By John H. St.John

In July I will be 85 if I live that long and never in my life have I felt more like Lewis Caroll’s Alice as she stepped into the mirror and entered Wonderland. It is not just that the corporations stole an election and gave us a mental defective for a president. It is a population that, pro or con, accepts the absurd idea that we are at war in Iraq. Even the bloody battles in Korea against Chinese and North Korean tanks was called a “police action”. The bloody attack shown to the world on television and proudly called “Shock and Awe” was done without any declaration of war. The present illegal occupation of Iraq is called a war and the moronic president is assuming all of the powers, and more, of a wartime president while Congress refuses his challenge to the Constitution. There have been other illegal incursions and undeclared wars, Vietnam for example; but at least they were fighting a well organized military organization.

Another example of Wonderland’s juggling of semantics is calling Iraqis who are resisting the occupation and punishing collaborators “insurgents”. When Boston and Philadelphia was occupied by British Redcoats and France was occupied by the Nazis we did not call those heroes who fought in the underground insurgents; we called them patriots. Everyone from the war lovers to the peaceniks preface their remarks with “Our brave troops” completely disregarding the reality that they are fighting civilians with AK-47s and no body armor with helicopter gunships and fighter planes. These are highly paid mercenaries promised college educations who do not have to dig slit trenches or do KP. When they come back in coffins or wheelchairs and with post traumatic stress syndrome even they are betrayed by this government run by our sociopath mad hatter president.

On the other side of the looking glass the country of the slithy sloves is nine trillion dollars in debt. Over half of our tax money goes to the military industrial complex and we have twelve aircraft carrier groups roaming the oceans when there is no possible adversary. Our kindly Jimmy Carter, (peace nobelist) has proudly helped launch another nuclear submarine called, what else?, The Jimmy Carter. The war on terror desperately needs these weapons because if they happen to run across a terrorist they have to nuke him or her. Like the westerner sentenced by Roy Bean to be hung: “This will sure be a lesson to me judge.”

When I was a teen-ager my father sarcastically said that “everyone else is crazy except you”. That was seventy years ago and I am even more convinced that is the case. After WWII I saw a psychiatrist for what is now called post traumatic stress syndrome. I quit him with the words: I don’t want to be adjusted to live in a world that is obviously crazier than I am. You do not have to look far to confirm my opinion. The headlines in this mornings paper should convince anyone.
FBI terror boss never read Moussaoui memo, Patent case poses broader question for Supreme Court, Abu Ghraib dog handler guilty of tormenting, Documents reveal Hussein tried in ‘90s to show WMDs gone, Bush says presence in Iraq will outlast his presidency, Conservatives get a turn at federal grants under Bush, False negatives seen in widely used genetic test for breast cancer risk, bottled water slaking thirst of world’s poor, court overturns conviction in stolen rock art case. Chemcal plants may decide own security, Iraqi official, paid by CIA raised questions on weapons program, the only reason I get the newspaper is for the New York Times crossword puzzle. I am suffering from information overload - all of it wacko.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gramps Posted by: Evoman
» RE: gramps Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: gramps Posted by: paul_revere
cityofangelslady
Posted by: cityofangelslady on Jul 4, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hurray for the reverend from Austin.
Great writing that made me laugh and think....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cityofangelslady Posted by: TerryS
It's play nice or
Posted by: owleyes on Jul 4, 2006 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
be violent. Despite their angry talk, people aren't ready for violence, so the next best thing is to hope for change from within. Of course, people know that this system is too far gone to change, but they will not commit to violence until it is widely perceived that there is no alternative. Just ask yourself, "what would it take for me to throw a molotov cocktail into a building?" Then ask yourself, "what would it take for me to shoot someone in the head?" You will see that you are not ready for violence. But we're closer than we were a while back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's play nice or Posted by: deaudonnee
There are no heroes!
Posted by: CovertRage on Jul 4, 2006 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People in search of human saviors are sheep who prefer the comfort of not having to think or act for themselves. They tend to be the same misguided gullible nitwits who bought into the tripe of worshipping at the temple of commerce (go shopping) to atone for the sins of some boogieman's murderous hatred of our freedoms and liberties to assure our future peace and safety. These sheep called themselves Christians too, ever oblivious to the warning that a declaration of peace and safety always initiates great tribulations, crowned with a loss of freedom and liberty. So-called heroes are in reality the insanity now in control of the assylum. We are not at the mercy of these so-called fathers who assure sheep they know best. It's shameful and depressing that warnings about hero-dangers have to still be uttered with urgency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the most sensible paragraph ever written here
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 4, 2006 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The flipside of not having heroes is not having demons either. Liberals must stop fixating on George Bush. Corporations took over America using politicians as sock puppets. It certainly makes a difference who sits in office, but we have not solved our problems if we impeach one of the socks. We must change the system. And the way to do that is from the bottom up.

Amen! :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

zero all
Posted by: timeless on Jul 4, 2006 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in a round world who can...choose sides. the people all have heads to use and contribute to the solutions'..focusing on the solutions assists in brings or birthing a new way. if there is a headquarters then how come everyone has a head ? need to be dominated inorder to fell the illusion of security? a solution to the problem is conscious awareness that indeed there is a problem...all together now ...one....two...three.........................progress is simple to take the next step and then the next and...............abra cadabra.....arrived. may the whole of existence recognize a whole..aho. aloha carlin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

misuse of Commander-in-Chief title
Posted by: nim1 on Jul 4, 2006 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But the flashier title "Commander in Chief" is our leader's title in a time of war." Wrong!

The President is, Constitutionally, the Commander-in-Chief of the military forces, always, not just in time of war. The President is not "Commander-in-Chief" of the citizenery - in time of war or not!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enemies first, then heroes
Posted by: HughEScott on Jul 4, 2006 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before picking heroes, we need to identify our enemies.

Bush is an easy target, but long after he retires, the neoconservatives that put him in power will still be in Washington, Republicans and Democrats, selling out working Americans, shredding the Constitution, and getting our kids killed in Iraq.

For the truth about the treasonous necons plus irrefutable hardcopy evidence of White House corruption, visit www.FreedomCentralUSA.com.

Hugh E. Scott, author, investigative journalist, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, Ronald Reagan fan and rabid neocon-hater with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Enemies first, then heroes Posted by: aurora2484
Don't focus on the statehead
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jul 4, 2006 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as most Third Reich studies focus disproportionately on Hitler, so today does the criticism focus too much on Bush. Hitler in no way was produced in a vacuum, nor sustained in a closet: he was a product of his time and the way he ran Germany was only as strong as the citizens supported it. Thank g-d an author pointed out what I've been saying for a long time: stop focusing on Bush! Sure, the guy sounds like a moron and his "awe shucks, I'm frahm Tehxsas" (wasn't he raised on the upper East Coast?) gets annoying. The guy is a criminal, but so is the system which stands behind him.

One of the biggest obstacles in the way of change, real change, in this country is the right and the left's inability to face reality and to reckon with the full truth that is the genocidal and enslaving legacy of these U.S.A. "But that was so long ago," they say. Was it? There still are reservations and not for nothing are many of the survivors of our genocide (the native americans) plagued by alcoholism and depression, so unfruitful is the future given them by our "founding fathers." Also, though blacks stopped being lynched in such large numbers in the 1960's, they were forcibly sterilezed (big up to the Nazis or is it Cold Springs Harbor, care of the Carnagie fund) nonetheless, drugs poured into their communities by the CIA (which they've never denied, btw), and our prison industry/criminal justice system has but become the new plantation. Visit a ghetto (which if you're a city boy/girl I can assure isn't such a far drive away from you if you're curious...maybe you can get on the bus) and ask yourself why the neighborhoods look like Iraq, circa 2006. See that homeless Vet on the corner: is he the face of patriotism? There was a time when the democratic party more resembled the present republican party, but the Civil War and Restoration screwed that all up. Go to the 1950's & 60's, and all those clandestine clansmen who once claimed the mantle of the democrats retreat into the republican party. What was Vietnam or Korea or Japan or Hawaii or the Phillipines? Gun-barrell democracy? But just in case you're a good liberal, thinking your heart is in the right place: that "college education" you believe is primarily responsible for your good fortune in life, has whiteness/white privildge helped you out at all? Do you even know what white privilge is or how it works? Why not?

My point is, Americans (if they wanna get serious) have to have an uncomfortable talk with the past AND the present. This country has much to be proud of...it also has a great deal more to be ashamed of. We must own the fact that yes, we have a Bill of Rights, but yes, we are also a country which incinerated 100,000+ people at the close of WWII (because our COLONY of Hawaii (itself gained through imperial criminality in 1899) was attacked by the Japanese). We must stop looking for leaders, but also stop being so innocent and naive about the way things really are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans are (generally) not well informed
Posted by: enzolima on Jul 4, 2006 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a truism of history that heroes usually lead to war whereas peace and democracy are preserved by an informed and involved citizenry. There is no question about it, America will grow tired of the cruelty and ignorance of the current administration.


The problem with htis arguiment is that Americans are collectively the most ill-informed people of the industrialised world. Many Americans are themselves cruel and ingnorent and make up the 35% who support Bush. And, the corporations run the major media so nada will change unless we bring back and enforce the Fairness Doctrine. Oh, to pine for the deeds of Richard Nixon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People miss the point
Posted by: beans on Jul 4, 2006 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boys and girls, why are we blaming politicians? They act because we the people allow this criminality to foster. The people are the ones to be blamed. Politicians are like little kids, they push and push to see what they can get away with and if the people do not "ground" them, well, they will keep doing it. This principle applies to everyone. Whether you are a cop, a janitor, actor, etc., one keeps pushing to see what they can get away with. Simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake up!
Posted by: rightwing1 on Jul 4, 2006 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent points.. especially the one about the left not having any candidates with a backbone.

The country wants and needs a strong leader. Bush is a strong leader weather you agree with him or not.

Its sad that values in this country seem to have been ignored by the left - while it has been the center of the rights platform! - the decline in values - increase in porn, religion banned from schools, our ex president have inappropriate sexual relations in the White House.. left or right ..makes no difference.. you raise kids in this country and you wonder how the left supports this decline..America is tired of this hence..the "right" backlash and Bush for 2 terms!

The left needs to clean up it's appearance and act.. show they can put values back in America and not be associate with allowing flag burning, failing to enact Jessica laws..letting sexual preditors go on "no jail" terms.etc..etc.

The only point I take exception with is the inference that only liberals are interested in democracy. Wake up..we are all Americans - the right has just been more in touch with Americans then the left has been!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wake up! Posted by: paul_revere
» RE: Wake up! Posted by: Addison
» RE: Wake up! Posted by: paul_revere
Candidate for Congress says "right on, Rev."
Posted by: DRosen on Jul 4, 2006 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heartily agree with everything the Reverend says in this article.

In fact, I believe it is very much in harmony with what some of us are trying to do in Nevada. We've created a Decision Management System, online, at Nevada Vote Direct. The system puts registered voters in our 2nd Congressional District IN CONTROL of their representative in Washington.

At Nevada Vote Direct, registered voters in Nevada's 2nd Congressional District may vote not only on the issues of the day, but also on specific legislation pending in Congress. The system provides secure electronic voting in secret ballots conducted continuously on the Internet or by telephone. People are not obligated to vote, and may vote only on the issues and bills that concern them. But this is not just another opinion poll, for I have pledged that, when elected, I will vote in Congress EXACTLY as directed by the majority of voters in my congressional district.

We see Nevada Vote Direct as the solution to the problem of political corruption, because no lobbyist will even attempt to buy my vote, knowing that my vote belongs to the majority of voters in my district - no ifs, ands or buts.

Ours is a grassroots campaign. I am a life-long professional musician, not a politician. We need your support. Please look us up and let other people know about what we're doing.

Onward and upward,
Daniel Rosen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Democracy for America? I hope not. Posted by: Lincoln fan
2nd that
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jul 4, 2006 9:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It might also help if we stopped shooting down the ones we have, or following "leaders" who are certainly NOT progressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you people?
Posted by: Phenix on Jul 6, 2006 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you people liberals, progressives, or socialists? I'm getting tired of hearing people say we are progressives when you toss Obama and Hillary into the fold and now I'm tired of seeing "progressives" who are most likely no different than Rockerfellar Republicans who quote Eugene Debs who was a great SOCIALIST leader. He did not support the paternalistic progressive approach of the early 1900s that brought us the wonders of abolition, Woodrow Wilson, and our first lovely Red Scares.

PS, this is not a post about the essay which I think is a clear and concise in its reasoning. People need to get involved on the LOCAL LEVEL. I am a democratic committee person and I can tell you that the Republicans own my county democrats but my county is now a majority Democratic county. The reason for this is simple. Rockerfellar Republicans were kicked out of the Republican party and now their taking over the Center-Right Democratic Party. Do we even have a left party anymore? The Greens are dead in my area.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]