Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Female Base for Hillary in '08 Isn't A Gimme

By Allison Stevens, Women's eNews. Posted June 27, 2006.


Politically active women's groups are already attacking Hillary Clinton for supporting the Iraq war and backing an anti-choice Senate candidate.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Allison Stevens

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A number of women's rights groups who might be considered the natural foundation of a historic White House bid by a strong female candidate are holding back support for New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, considered the early front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2008.

"I would be really disappointed if Hillary Clinton were the first woman president," said Medea Benjamin, a self-described feminist and founder of Code Pink, a women-initiated antiwar group based in Venice, Calif.

Among issues of concern to some women are Clinton's support of the war in Iraq, her rhetorical emphasis on preventing pregnancy rather than abortion rights and her reluctance to back universal health care.

"It's that push and pull of wanting to see a woman at that level of government and also wanting to see that issues that affect my life as a woman are being addressed," said Jen Sunderland, chair of the Women's Liberation Social Wage Committee, a New York group that lobbies for better wages and benefits for women and parents.

Clinton has teamed up with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada who opposes abortion rights, to introduce legislation aimed at preventing pregnancy by enhancing access to contraception and reducing health care costs. Critics see the bill as an attempt to shift the debate away from the controversial issue of abortion rights.

"I would like Senator Clinton, as I would like all pro-choice representatives, to start any conversation about reproductive justice and reproductive health by saying, 'I support access to safe, affordable, legal abortions,' period," said Melody Drnach, action vice president at the Washington-based National Organization for Women.

Plenty of women thrilled

Plenty of women are thrilled with the possibility of voting for Clinton in 2008, said Marie Wilson, president of the White House Project, a group in New York aimed at seating a woman in the presidency. Young women in particular view Clinton as a "rock star," she said.

Wilson says Clinton faces higher expectations from voters--including women--because she is the first credible woman to consider running for the presidency. Progressive women in particular want the first serious female candidate to be "100 percent perfect on issues," Wilson said.

"Women always suffer more scrutiny and they always suffer sharper criticism," added Georgia Duerst-Lahti, a professor of political science and women's studies at Beloit College in Beloit, Wis. "Every move she makes is magnified."

Clinton has not said whether she will seek her party's presidential nomination.

Spokesperson Ann Lewis said Clinton is focusing on winning re-election to her Senate seat and can expect strong support from women in the November elections. In her 2000 campaign, Clinton won the women's vote by a margin of 60 to 39 percent, Lewis said.

"We are very pleased with the support we're getting from women," Lewis told Women's eNews, noting endorsements for the September primary by the New York state chapters of NARAL Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, both pro-choice groups.

Clinton earned a 100 percent rating last year from NARAL Pro-Choice America, the country's leading abortion rights lobby, and voted against the nominations of Samuel Alito and John Roberts to the Supreme Court.

Clinton has championed legislation that would address pay disparities between men and women and another bill that would raise the minimum wage. She has fought to preserve Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, which disproportionately aid women because they tend to have lower incomes than men. She has worked to protect equal access for girls and women in sports and education and supports increased funding for small businesses owned by women and programs that aid battered women. She is also co-chair of Vital Voices, an international program she initiated as first lady that invests in emerging female leaders around the world.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Allison Stevens is Washington bureau chief at Women's eNews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Michael Townes Watson
Posted by: michaeltwatson on Jun 27, 2006 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reservations expressed by some women regarding Hillary Clinton are understandable. It does not make sense to put a woman in the White House just for the sake of having a woman in the White House. It is also unbecoming for any politician to try to be all things to all people. Hillary's views on some things may appear triangulated. The bottom line of any candidate, however, is that we do not know how they will act come crunch time in the office of the Presidency. I trust her instinct to do right on the important things more than I would most. On the issue of abortion rights, it does not hurt for her to try to say things in a way that will allow her to get elected, if we know she will do the right thing in office. As a male, that may be easier for me to say. One thing I do know is that her stance on bringing quality, safe medical care to us is something she feels very strongly about. I am working with her legislative staff on legislation, called the National Medic Act, which will benefit women, children and the elderly, by preserving their access to the justice system when they are hurt by medical error. Not many of our politicians have been willing to assume that political risk. It is not yet an issue in the forefront, but it is a crucial issue to women, who Ted Kennedy says are more discriminated against on this issue than many others. Michael Townes Watson, author of America's Tunnel Vision--How Insurance Companies' Propaganda Is Corrupting Medicine and Law. www.AmericasTunnelVision.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Michael Townes Watson Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Michael Townes Watson Posted by: jareilly
Hillary: One Thing Is Compromising, Another Is Selling Out
Posted by: ZPaul on Jun 27, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know that in politics, sometimes it´s necessary to make limited compromises. But Hillary´s shown herself to be willing, not simply to compromise, but to effectively sell out to climb rungs on the political ladder. Yes, she´s smart, and does speak well at times, but I don´t trust her, and my wife doesn´t either. I think it would be great to have a woman president, and for the sake of convenience, it´s a temptation to take the "easy" route of picking Hillary. But I don´t want to vote for a "lesser evil" president -- do you? I want a President who is willing to stand up to the Right, and put them in their place!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary...?
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 27, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary in a chimpanzi suit designed to fit GW Bush?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huck Fillery
Posted by: Hedgwitch on Jun 27, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd rather support Condi Rice than Hillery.

If we were to elect a woman Predident, however, I would much prefer someone with Honor and Integrity - like Karen Kwiatkowski.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huck Fillery Posted by: WhuThe?!?
winnning
Posted by: griggsy on Jun 27, 2006 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the pro-Hillary comments in the article. She is liberal enough for many of us and would pull in others not so liberal .Her photo ops with opponents show she can bridge differences rather than be a puri st , a self -defeater. The other putative democratic candidates have good points also.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary is an opportunist
Posted by: wawa on Jun 27, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last Novemeber Senator Clinton traveled to Jerusalem.

She stood at the separation/apartheid Wall-
which has been ruled ILLEGAL and must come down by the International Court of Justice-
and pandered to her constituents in New York with her statement in Haaretz-

Streaming on WAWA is Mordechai Vanunu's UNCENSORED VIDEO comment's on her insensitive and completely erroneous statement that The Wall is great security

Every Palestinian, would be terrorist, and this American- who rode in a taxi [in Dec 2005 and Jan and March 2006] from Bethlehem to Jerusalem where the checkpoint was unmanned and the wall unfinished found the way around.


A public service to
We the People
from the
.org
WeAreWideAwake

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Women are not naive Posted by: rclord
As A Man
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jun 27, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a man I am against Hilary for numerous reasons first of which is that I no longer want to live in the past of this country and she repesents the past. She is also disconnected from those who actually live in this country, and has not lead any successful political, social or economic policy (beginning with her failed attempt at changing health care which revealed her lack of understanding of the entire issue). Lastly as a marriage partner she is grossly negligent. Bill Clinton was and most likely still is a sex addict. Hilary should have, for many reasons, demanded he receive help for this destructive behavior instead of allowing it to disrupt his life, the presidency and give fodder to the neocons who now have power. Instead she became the enabler who was more concerned for her own needs. In the end I actually have no idea whatsoever who Hilary is and what she represents. Next candidate, please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As A Man Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: As A Man Posted by: ChristopherLL
» GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: pianojo
» RE: GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: ChristopherLL
» RE: GET REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: ChristopherLL
I Can't Help It
Posted by: lafrance on Jun 27, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but, I find Hillary extreemly boring. I have heard her speak a couple times and I do not feel inspired. just tired.
I also resent having someone pushing something in my face as the media insists on doing with Hillary. You never hear or see the other Democratic Canidates but, you have Hillary shoved down your throat on a daily basis. Don't tell me who to vote for or support. I have a brain. I want to hear others. I want to make up my own mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary lost my vote a long time ago!
Posted by: pianojo on Jun 27, 2006 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in NY. Hillary is one of my Senators because I was one of the people who voted for her. I had fully intended to vote for her again, should she run for either Senator or President.

But NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!

Why?

For all the reasons enumerated in this article. She is a HAWK. She has consistently voted FOR money to fund this miserable war. She has called for 90,000 more troops to be sent to fight this war.

She has supported Bob Casey, an anti-choice Democrat running in Pennsylvania against Rick Santorum.

She has supported inviting anti-choice people into the Democratic Party.

I have written to her any number of times about single-payer national health insurance. She has never once responded to any of my emails about this.

A year or so ago I read an article online which discussed her inclusion of religion in a speech she gave.

In every way Hillary Clinton is, in my mind, far from a desirable candidate.

Sure, I'd LOVE to see a woman as President, but not THIS woman. As far as I can tell she couldn't care less about the things that are of importance to me. I see no reason to support her if she refuses to support me.

Finally, Hillary Clinton is one of the reasons that I - a lifelong Democrat from a family of lifelong Democrats - left the Democratic Party and will never again vote for one as long as they refuse to stand up and stop the rise of Fascism in this country. I no longer see much difference between the GOP and Dems. From here on out I vote my conscience and not because I want to stop the GOP. I am SICK TO DEATH of voting for the lesser of two evils. NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm a Green myself Posted by: rclord
» my sentiments exactly Posted by: rclord
» my sentiments exactly Posted by: rclord
» The KING and Clinton Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: The KING and Clinton Posted by: pianojo
issue based reasons
Posted by: Phenix on Jun 27, 2006 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HC is no different than the neo-cons and neo-liberals. She supports the war in Iraq and the greater goals of the WoT mainly control of all Middle East and Central Asian oil. You can easily (ok so not easily) map the location of US bases with access to oil or pipelines. HC also supports the Inverstor Rights Agreements that are packaged as Free Trade Agreements.

IMO, her stances on social issues are meaningless: Does it matter if you have the right to an abortion when our economy is in the shitter and we're stuck in a full scale Middle East war?

HC is essentially a member of the Liberal Wing of the War Party that believes the US can become a compassionate empire which is a contradiction in terms. The US has always been a reactionary imperial force in Latin America and its role as protector of elites has only grown since WWII. HC represents that strate of US soceity, a part of our society that I do not wish to have represent me.

I know that I will not get everything I want in a candidate but I will certainly support a Feingold over any Democrat even Gore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Choice is a Woman's Liberty Posted by: mstenger
HRC TOOL OF THE DLC
Posted by: RhodesVan3000 on Jun 27, 2006 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like Bill she is pushing the globalist agenda of the DLC. In other words she is just one side of the same coin. The liberal wing of the War Party is no better than the conservative side of the War Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

marifrance
Posted by: marifrance on Jun 27, 2006 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary does NOT have the support of Progessives women or men. She's being pushed to the front because she can draw $$$ support for the Dem party. the GOP would love to have her as the candidate. They'd win again.
the Dem Party pushed Kerry up there because of $$$. Please listen to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary in 2008
Posted by: gogm on Jun 27, 2006 8:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just say "NO" to Hillary!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Trust Here Either
Posted by: Aim on Jun 28, 2006 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I'm a woman, but all I can say is, I really, really hope she doesn't win the nomination. I don't think she will win, and for good reason. She acts like Republican-Light to me, even if she is a smart woman. Too much cowtowing to the right, whether we're talking war or abortion. Feingold needs a closer look. It seems every day I find more reason to believe in him as a candidate for the goals I believe in for this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary remains original and effective
Posted by: robchapman on Jun 28, 2006 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following statement taken from the article about Senator Clinton illustrates her problem and her potential on one of two issues: health care and the war in Iraq.

Others have taken Clinton to task for declining to support universal health care, an issue that women's rights activists say would benefit women because they are often left without health insurance if they take time off work to care for family members. Quotation from the preceding article.

Senator Clinton can only be taken to task for declining to support universal health care by ideaologues who view single-payer as the only form of universal coverage.

Clinton has shown comittment, intelligence and courage in suporting Universal Health Care and in setting forth a workable and comprehensive plan to achieve it.

Senator Clinton does not support the idealogists, she supports the people and tries to formulate plans that work.

As a US Senator, Hillary has shown pragmatism, intelligence and openness to others in forming alliances and coaltions in support of important issues.

Yes, as a US Senator, Hillary supported the President in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack and voted in favor authorizing his use of force if needed in Iraq. But she did not vote for a declaration of war.

It behooves us to remember the situation in 02 when America was struggling to respond to the first foreign attack on our soil since the War of 1812.

If Clinton had been President after 9/11, she would have hunted down the murderers who killed 3,500 American workers at the World Trade Center and would never have been distracted and foisted an unnecessary and unwinnable war on us as Bush did.

As President, Clinton's response to al Qaada terrorism would have been swifter, defter and better than the blundering and sluggish responses we have seen from the Bush Administration.

Should she decide to run, be nominated and be elected President, Senator Clinton will blow the glass ceiling to the moon and end forever anyone's perconception that politics and government is a male preserve.

She smash the glass ceiling by unleashing a flood of pragmatic, effective and non-idealogical remedies to the problems besetting our nation.

Hillary is a figure of the future: a future in which public service, public goods, and the public space is honored and enhanced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary remains original and effective
Posted by: robchapman on Jun 28, 2006 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following statement taken from the article about Senator Clinton illustrates her problem and her potential on one of two issues: health care and the war in Iraq.

Others have taken Clinton to task for declining to support universal health care, an issue that women's rights activists say would benefit women because they are often left without health insurance if they take time off work to care for family members. Quotation from the preceding article.

Senator Clinton can only be taken to task for declining to support universal health care by ideaologues who view single-payer as the only form of universal coverage.

Clinton has shown comittment, intelligence and courage in suporting Universal Health Care and in setting forth a workable and comprehensive plan to achieve it.

Senator Clinton does not support the idealogists, she supports the people and tries to formulate plans that work.

As a US Senator, Hillary has shown pragmatism, intelligence and openness to others in forming alliances and coaltions in support of important issues.

Yes, as a US Senator, Hillary supported the President in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack and voted in favor authorizing his use of force if needed in Iraq. But she did not vote for a declaration of war.

It behooves us to remember the situation in 02 when America was struggling to respond to the first foreign attack on our soil since the War of 1812.

If Clinton had been President after 9/11, she would have hunted down the murderers who killed 3,500 American workers at the World Trade Center and would never have been distracted and foisted an unnecessary and unwinnable war on us as Bush did.

As President, Clinton's response to al Qaada terrorism would have been swifter, defter and better than the blundering and sluggish responses we have seen from the Bush Administration.

Should she decide to run, be nominated and be elected President, Senator Clinton will blow the glass ceiling to the moon and end forever anyone's perconception that politics and government is a male preserve.

She smash the glass ceiling by unleashing a flood of pragmatic, effective and non-idealogical remedies to the problems besetting our nation.

Hillary is a figure of the future: a future in which public service, public goods, and the public space is honored and enhanced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]