Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush: Breaking the Law, Again and Again

By Larisa Alexandrovna, Huffington Post. Posted June 26, 2006.


The Bush administration is using the Treasury Department and the CIA to mine American banking records, all in an effort to find the next terra cell.
Advertisement

Yes, I know, seven people were arrested -- five Americans -- in a strange thought-crime plot to bomb the Sears Tower.

In other news, the Bush administration has apparently been doing more illegal domestic surveillance, this time of banking records.

Is it a coincidence that news of the first supposed terra-folks located within the United States since the attacks of 2001 would come on the same day as this damning story?

Perhaps, but this is after all an administration that writes its own news and disseminates it. While it is easy to dismiss such questioning as simply cynicism, the reality is far too ugly to ignore -- namely, that people who have already violated Federal and international law and repeatedly lied despite evidence contrary to their assertions would abuse their powers yet again for such an obvious and naked ploy.

According to a ten-page article in the New York Times this past Thursday, in case you missed it due to the lack of a functioning and independent fourth estate, the Bush administration is using the Treasury Department and the CIA to mine American banking records, all in an effort to find the next terra cell, which by the way they just happened to do the very day this news broke.

What the NYT describes can only be seen as illegal and far-reaching, leaving any reasonable person laughing in horror at the idea of John Snow and Porter Goss -- or now General Hayden -- working together to sift through our finances, all looking for the ghost of Osama Bin Laden. Chances are that looking for the actual Osama might yield better results, but this is not an administration searching for Osama, when the myth of him is so much more politically potent. Osama won't be "found" until he is needed for a victory dance that will neatly tie Iraq, Iran, WMD and 911 together in some fantasy story, delivered just in time for political purposes. Will Osama's head too be splashed all over the news and displayed at press briefings in a large wooden frame?

But back to Snow, who appears terribly concerned about locating the terrorists via bank files, our bank files that is. There is of course a good reason to track suspected terrorists and drug traffickers by following the money, as it will, of course, lead to the culprits eventually. But somehow I don't think Snow is looking for that kind of information.

After all, was it not John Snow who approved the Dubai Ports deal, allegedly without notifying the President of the United States, the Defense Department, or the Tsar of Homeland Security?

Not only that, Snow continued to argue despite these facts that the proper people were briefed and assured us that we were all snug and safe in our beds. But aside from the obvious questions surrounding Snow's alleged involvement in some shady business dealings, what is most fascinating is the contradiction of the Dubai Ports deal juxtaposed against the backdrop of these newest revelations of domestic surveillance.


Dubai is the hub for the banking needs of terrorists, drug dealers, and all manner of criminals who wish to launder, transfer, or simply hide large amounts of cash. In fact, Dubai is directly connected to the events of 911 and directly connected to the 911 hijackers' money transfers.

Forgive me if this is an ignorant question, but why is a man who approves access to 21 sensitive and unprotected points of interest in the United States for the very people who helped fund the 911 hijackers given carte blanche to look for terrorists in our bank records? Am I missing something here?


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Code of Hammuarabi
Posted by: laredo on Jun 26, 2006 12:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a theory: the ultimate reason for Bush's attack on Iraq lies with his deep-seated fear and hatred of the law. After all, it was the Iraqis (ok, Mesopotamians then) who originally created laws when Hammuarabi first promulgated his Code (subsequently plagiarized by the ancient Hebrews). Ergo, why not attack Bush's overarching enemy at its root? Or am I ascribing more depth to Bush than he deserves? Would he know Hammuarabi from a hamburger?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Code of Hammuarabi Posted by: Rolomax
Sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jun 26, 2006 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell no he has never heard of Hammurabi. If told would he would think it went on a bun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

operating illegally
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 26, 2006 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies have gotten so used to operating illegally that the illegal method has become their method of choice. Women get no choice because the Bushies prefer to use the criminal mode every which way they can. IMPEACH THE CRIMINALS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Arrest the criminals Posted by: harpy
» RE: Arrest the criminals Posted by: willymack
» RE: operating illegally..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
Transparency
Posted by: needlefoot on Jun 26, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be nice if the activities of the Bush administration - the American government - were as transparent to us as our lives are to it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Disclosures
Posted by: Christie on Jun 26, 2006 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to a BBC note online, Dick Cheney said the financial disclosures were "disturbing" and he condemned as "offensive" US media disclosures of a secret program that probes global financial transactions. This sounds like a pretty mild response. My theory is that this Administration (read “Cheney”) has such a grip on the country that he feels he can just give a pro forma nod by way of objection to this latest disclosure by the New York Times.

Consider what is being said on the Internet in comparison with what is being reported in the mainstream media. For example, the existence of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and 9/11 Truth .org should be covered extensively in the mainstream media. Or what about the fact, as reported by Robert Kennedy Jr., that Bush/Cheney are not the legitimately elected president/vice-president?

Now those disclosures in The New York Times might get a real rise out of him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jun 26, 2006 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I keep pointing out these scumbags were't elected they were selected. The world is amazed at how low this country has sunk under Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Karl Dreedly
Posted by: luckycef on Jun 26, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the world there has always been dictators. The world has survivived them and in due course they were brought to justice and were condemned to death. We have survived Hitler and he took the chicken way out. Too bad Bush and Cheney do not follow suit. Then there was Musolini and he was hung by neck till dead. I look forward to the Day Bush and Cheney meet the gallows pole. Then ther was TOJO and he also was executed and the same fate awaits Bush and Cheney. The goodness and the spirit of the people will rise up from theashes and doldrums and justice will be brought to all that are in deserve of the penalty of the Laws they have broken and their fate is sealed as it is only a matter of time.
The people will have their say and the crimes will be charged. We must all get together and fight to this happens. Never leave a stone un turned. The Criminals may get away for a bit in time and they are the cause of their own demise. The case is building and the Nations of the world will rally around are side and Justice will be restored and life will go on. Just another bad page of history for us to study to prevent this tragedy from once again to occur.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dick Must Think He's Dick
Posted by: pelle_in_goal on Jun 26, 2006 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had General Hayden and his NSA "Data Mining" program not been given control over the CIA for domestic surveillance, I'd probably still think the neo-cons might leave offfice constitutionally in 2009 should they lose the election. Now, I know they won't have to.

I've been asleep on the possible use of the IRS by other government agencies to "shell game" funds from one illegal function to another. And also "altering" the tax records of public and private agencies -- instead of "auditing" -- that the Administration supports or that support the Administration.

But ultimately, the "White House Enemies' List" is back and stronger than ever. Larisa Alexandrova is right on about the uses of financial and tax record data mining to threaten political dissidents, eleced officials, and -- when neccessary -- -- to manufacture some influence peddling scandal by political opponents. Jack Abramoff will be a distant memory soon enough while the stooge media jump on some new scandal involving Bush's enemies.

But what isn't being said right now about the IRS becoming the newest "member" of the DHS is the affect that data mining will have on the IRS itself. Reivew of tax records by agencies outside of Internal Revenue will only slow the IRS's job -- which is tough enough now. Slower tax record processing and misplaced priorities will reduce the overall amount of the legal tax collection -- costing the country tens of billions of dollars more in lost revenues each year.

I've got to admit I'm almost overawed by the "systems" approach the White House has so far been able to muster. By that I mean that changing the functions of entire segments of government so that the scandals, budget fudging, black ops, influence peddling, slush finds, and finally -- scandal on the front pages -- can be made to disappear overnight. It's like the neo-cons sit around and say "here's where we f**ked up." And then someone proposes "here's what can we do to make sure this never happens again. We don't want to stop the Jack Abramoffs of the world we just want to stop people like Abramoff from being bad press again."

We also forget what the "ultimate" goal of neo-conservatism is. For that purpose, the neo-cons want to achieve the total de-regulation of government. That means is achieved when the Internal Revenue Service is fully privatized. Congress will eventually have no voice in taxation; who gets taxed from then on will become a function of the Chief Executive and those around him. It wil have some thin veneer of legality -- some "private" firm that tax collecting is outsourced to -- but in reality it'll be the same people who want to see the wealthiest people and corporations in the nation to pay no taxes at all.

That thought doesn't particularly turn me on at all. You and I will be getting paid a lot less and taxed a lot more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YAWN . . . ZZZZZZ
Posted by: FauxPorteno on Jun 26, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what's new under the sun?? Absolutely nothing! What is everyone going to do about it? - that is besides huff and puff and bluster and excoriate and . . . YAWN - ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL!!

Now back to complaining and patting one another on the back and saying "yeah - you sure told him truedempoet2006!!" NOT that I actually achieved anything more when I was living in the US. I tried though - got arrested several times and decided I had had enough. You will all do the same, giving up in turn as you slowly realize THAT NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE IN AMERICA!!

The $$$$$ involved in this life-size Monopoly game has simply bought far too many people for any meaningful change. Yes they will throw you some crumbs to keep the silly, dumb asses inured to the corrupt, decrepit and injust system but don't ever plan on HAHAHA - UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE or HAHAHA TRULY EFFICIENT AUTOMOBILES OR FUELS!!! Just count on the next microscopic I-pod and more trash tv to keep the Pavlovian dogs salivating at the notion of a - GASP - 2nd Brangelina Child - Oh The Wonder!!!!

Yes keep pinning your hopes on Gore or Obama like good little machines . . . Republicans have all been bought and paid for - you all act as if Dems are cut from a different cloth - The funniest notion of all!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: YAWN . . . ZZZZZZ Posted by: the poet
» RE: YAWN . . . ZZZZZZ Posted by: FedererFan
» RE: YAWN . . . ZZZZZZ Posted by: Steven Wanzell
ECLECTICIST, S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Jun 26, 2006 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"All of these 4th quarter antics are to confuse the issues of debt, Iraq war, Medicare, etc, and a Giant Smoke screen to CYA Snow's screw-ups....These actions were "chum" to the sharks, and to the "led -by-the-nose" media that are too busy developing their lip structures and shining their brown noses to report honest news, not gossip...
Futher, besides the incompetent 535 buffoons in Congress, do we have to put up with these News novices with their spectacular "Turd Blossom Gossips...???

A recent adage that applies to these troubled and incoherent times : "
"We have too many high sounding words, and too few actions that correspond with them." -- Abigail Adams

Can we hear an amen...???

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COINTELPRO has been completely resurrected and is in full force.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 26, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Treasury officials did not seek individual court-approved warrants or subpoenas to examine specific transactions, instead relying on broad administrative subpoenas for millions of records from the cooperative, known as Swift."

Well, that must be so that they can spy on their domestic political opposition, something that the judicial branch would likely frown on. Likely they are targeting anti-war activists and protestors, and will probably try using the IRS to harass people based on any information they can dig up.

The safety of the American people? I halfway expect Bush&Co. to allow another terrorist attack in the US before the elections; it would help them out politically, wouldn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's Comical Efforts
Posted by: Artkansas on Jun 26, 2006 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remind me of the joke about the drunk looking for his car keys under a convenient light post.

When questioned by a passerby, the drunk admits that the keys were lost elsewhere, but he's searching by the lightpost because the light is better.

Typical Bush League actions, Osama was in Afghanistan or Pakistan, but Bush is fighting terrorism in Iraq. Now he's going to search for Osama Bin Laden's money in America.

I can give him a few hints of where to look. Check out Arbusto Energy, Harken Energy and the Carlyle Group.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History of Congress
Posted by: mite on Jun 26, 2006 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know how easy it is to focus on the Bush's (Senior & Junior),Cheney and the others in the administration, but we need to understand! It is our Congress that is behind this fake war of Terror and our loss of rights and liberty's.
It all started in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act, allowing the financial institutions to form a private corporation of banks. It is like Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) said;
"Give me control over a nations currency and I care not who makes the laws". Our Congress passed this Act of treason along with many others since then.
People wake up you vote these individuals into office wihout researching thier voting records. Mark Twain said it best- "It could probably br shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress. (1885)
There is a war against us America to subvert our freedoms and turn this country into a police state, which will make the KGB, and Hitler look like childs play.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accounts
Posted by: Maryanne on Jun 26, 2006 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having a checking account, insurance policies, several small retirement funds scattered between CDs, and brokers, we receive statements for each of these- and others- about their privacy policies. Are these just scraps of paper that we can throw out as worthless- or do they mean what they say? That our financial matters are private and not available to others. If these privacy policies are so ironclad that info cannot be released without our permission, how can the government be prowling through them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I waz 'ere
Posted by: the poet on Jun 26, 2006 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can just imagine the looks of bewilderment on everybody's face as they open up their bank statement to see at the bottom:

"I waz 'ere 06 - Bush, Dick, Rummy and Rice - =)"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is affronted at the publication of Administration crimes!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 26, 2006 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has angrily denounced this latest revelation of government domestic-international spy programs, of which, until today, Al Queda-like operatives were completely unaware of. Now they are changing all their banking practices, as of today - what a devastating blow to US intelligence efforts! Now they are going to start thinking their phones are tapped...

"A disgrace" - that's what revealing the truth about the Bush Administration involves. Whose disgrace? Hey guess what terrorists - the US government is spying on your banking transactions - is that why you've been doing all your business with large bundles of cash for the last five years?

The real reason for lack of judicial review of all these spy programs is criminal behavior and a need to limit the number of people who know about it. Why can't they have a judge sign off on investigations of certain individual's finances? Given the number of corporate connections this administration has, you can bet their cronies get to sneak a peek at those cash flows every now and again - simply a matter of 'having an edge' in your business deals - and we all need a little edge, now don't we? A little foresight, an intimate knowledge of the competitor's position?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree the Bush administration is criminal
Posted by: eastcoker on Jun 26, 2006 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this what the CIA does for a living? I am glad I did not listen to my dad and pursue a career with them. Heinous. Absolutely disgusting. What kind of country am I living in? The administration sucks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Must Wake Up!
Posted by: thinkverybig on Jun 26, 2006 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so sick and tired of BUSH and his lies... that I could cry. I am pissed off at the American People for not protesting and voicing their displeasure with this idiotic BUSH and his staff. We must wake up folks to this country being destroyed and set back a 100 years with the policies of this administration.

It's time for a change.... it's time for a REVOLUTION.


Coming soon.... "WeMustChange.org"

I ask for you help..... email me at david@thinkverybig.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What happens after Impeachment?
Posted by: Ray on Jul 1, 2006 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After these scum suckin tub-o-guts are impeached, the newly empowered congress, mass of people, and you and me (I'll let you be in my dream, if I can be in yours) finally discover that we had just come out of a South American or Asian sytled coup to overthrow the United States, the people, the government, the Constitution, liberals, pro peace and anti war citizens and non citizens - everything that was built in the positive over the past 230 years. We will discover that the fascist pirate ripoff bastards who took over after Clinton's demise (threw us to the lions) ARE more accurately Class Warfare Criminals committing class warfare crimes against everyone not in their one-tenth of one percent of the US population; and crimes against the same percentages of human life world wide. Ninety-nine point ninety-nine percent of the people will say not only have they murdered and maimed young men, women and children in both America and Iraq and other countries; violated massive citizenship, human and labor rights here and throughout the world; BUT they have also ripped off trillions of frickin dollars from US tax payers, and from people across this small planet. Then we have to answer, "WHERE DID THAT MONEY, GOLD GO?" "Who has it?"

Why will we ask those questions????? Because we demand every penny of it back from all individuals and companies and secret hidden CIA styled terrorist groupings where ever or who ever they might be. They must give it all back. No exceptions!

Then we must go about the labors of finding those criminal stashes.

Oops, one problem. The Class Warfare Criminals have successfully hidden all that wealth within CIA/Treasury Department/NSA/Carlye/NAC/Haliburton/Eron/ Imerate/Saudi coffers and banks. And no one knows where it is hidden. A complete and successful wash, cover-up, ripoff; a modern burying of stollen pirate loot and treasure(y).

Not only is this financial spying of personal and corporate records used to compete by gangester businesses against other businesses - it is also front end loading a defensive position to protect their capitol accumulation after they are imprisoned or executed for massive murders, high crimes and treasons.

The neocon fascists Class Warfare Criminals see the writing on the walls. They will either murder all of us, or they will make plans and build instrumentalities for a strategic and managable retreat. Thus, they will maintain their hidden wealth accumulation only to refinance another and more complete coup within 4 to 8 years. Simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's the Coverage?
Posted by: billfaster on Oct 29, 2006 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that the NY Times ombudsman says his paper was wrong to report on the banking-data surveillance program, where is the coverage?

The ombudsman now believes that his reasoning was "flawed."
"Since the job of public editor requires me to probe and question the published work and wisdom of Times journalists, there’s a special responsibility for me to acknowledge my own flawed assessments," Calame wrote on Sunday.

Calame says that his prior defense "was off base," and "while it’s a close call now, as it was then," he doesn't "think the article should have been published."

"I haven't found any evidence in the intervening months that the surveillance program was illegal under United States laws," Calame continues. "Also, there still haven’t been any abuses of private data linked to the program, which apparently has continued to function."

Read the full article here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/opinion/22pubed.html?

ex=1162180800&en=6d0d83480347095c&ei=5070&emc=eta1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]