Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Exposing the CIA's Italian Kidnapping Plot

By Jeffrey Klein and Paolo Pontoniere, New America Media. Posted June 20, 2006.


Italy is delving into its intelligence agency's involvement with the CIA in waging an off-the-books war on global terrorism.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Italian investigators are continuing to probe Italy's role in America's anti-terrorist war, particularly the rendition and torture of U.S.-wanted terrorist suspects. Reacting to the public and media outcry, the Italian parliament is also tracing links between Italian defense firms and the country's recently defeated government in an attempt to understand how these connections may have pushed Italy into an unpopular war.

The investigation will focus on the role played by Giovanni Castellaneta, currently Italy's ambassador to the United States, in the crafting and the delivery of the yellowcake dossier to the White House. The Italian Senate investigation seeks to detail the full extent of its intelligence agency's involvement with its American counterpart in waging an off-the-books war on international terrorism.

"Castellaneta's role is pivotal, not only because he seems to be deeply involved with the yellowcake dossier and the steering of the Marine One contract to Finmeccanica, but also because he is at the crossroad of many of Italy's activities in relation to the more general American-led war on international terrorism," states Francesco Martone, Italian senator from Sardinia for Sinistra Europea and a member of the Foreign Affairs Commission. Martone is a leading promoter of a full scope parliamentary investigation.

Recent revelations by La Repubblica, ANSA and L'espresso -- some of Italy's leading media -- support the hypothesis that the Italian agencies played a more central role in covert U.S. operations and the expansion of American military activities abroad, and that Castellaneta, on the Italian side, is the nexus for this collaboration. (See sidebar.)

For instance, Italian media have revealed that intelligence operatives close to Sismi have been involved in America's "extraordinary rendition" program. Italian agents actively participated in the Feb. 17, 2003, daylight kidnapping on a Milan street of Hussan Mustafa Omar Nasr, or Abu Omar, an Egyptian imam who had legally obtained political asylum in Italy by proving he'd be tortured if repatriated. Omar was "rendered" to Egypt -- snatched, drugged, beaten, humiliated and transmitted to Cairo via a plane leased by the CIA from the Boston Red Sox's owner. (Photos of the jet on the Cairo airport tarmac show the Red Sox team decal temporarily removed.) Omar was immediately incarcerated in an Egyptian prison where, according to Dick Marty, a Swiss congressman who recently produced a report on behalf of the Council of Europe, Omar was beaten and electrical shocks were administered to his genitals. The cell phone records of CIA agent Robert Lady, who managed the snatch in Milan, place Lady in Cairo during the initial interrogations. "It may safely be inferred," Marty's report concludes, "that [Lady] contributed, in one way or another, to the interrogation."

Although Italy's intelligence agency partnered with the CIA in the kidnapping, neither agency informed the Italian anti-terrorism police. These carabiniere thought for more than a year that Omar had fled on his own to the Balkans, a wild goose chase spurred by an urgent (fake) tip offered by the CIA. Omar resurfaced via telephone from Cairo in April 2004, when he was briefly consigned to house detention because the Egyptians decided he wasn't a threat. Once Omar alerted his wife in Italy of his fate, however, he was rearrested and placed in solitary confinement.

Italian authorities have vehemently denied any foreknowledge of, let alone participation in, the Omar kidnapping. Nonetheless the independent Italian judiciary persisted, and in late 2005, European-wide arrest warrants were issued for 22 CIA operatives whom an Italian prosecutor accused of kidnapping Abu Omar. But in April 2006, just after Berlusconi was defeated, his outgoing justice minister told the prosecutors that he would not pass their extradition request on to the United States -- a step that is usually a formality.

In May of this year, a member of Italy's paramilitary police force was indicted for having helped the CIA carry out the kidnapping. "Ludwig," as he was called by other members of the CIA's abduction team, stopped Abu Omar as he was walking along a Milan street and asked to see his identification papers. As Omar showed his papers, two men leapt out, gassed him and bundled him off. Ludwig's boss and operational partner was Marco Mancini, Gen. Nicolo Pollari's right-hand man. In turn, Gen. Pollari, the Italian Intelligence Agency's director, is the man who delivered the yellowcake dossier to Condoleezza Rice and Steve Hadley in the White House.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
clear
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 20, 2006 4:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is clear that our super-corrupt presidency accelerated the corruptions of the already corrupt then Italian leadership. There ain't nobody like the Bushies for spreading torture, war crimes, mass murder and other crimes throughout the rest of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

red sox logo removed?
Posted by: dannrusso on Jun 20, 2006 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you sure it wasn't an anti-David Ortiz plot?

ok ok - kidding... kidding...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Noam Chomsky
Posted by: Gregor on Jun 20, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you read anything by Noam Chomsky you will see the US has had a long history of globabl involvement where we set up situations, overthrew governments, slaughtered thousands of people...We have a dirty and dark past when it comes to international involvement. The morality in this country has always been up to the average citizen, not our elected leaders. Our leaders have always and will always serve their own political interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Noam Chomsky: TRAITOR Posted by: feller
» RE: Noam Chomsky: TRAITOR Posted by: maxpayne
groups within groups
Posted by: jearls on Jun 20, 2006 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that Bush's US prefers bilateral understandings with a few of the EU's most right wing gov'ts instead of the EU proper. This is a constant pattern of current US policy. Sometimes these are open like the "coalition of the willing" (instead of the UNO), and other times secret like in this case, because they are always illegal and unpopular. One notes that the public ones always open up into more secret ones. The governments of the "willing" are always ready to play along, since at the final secret level there are always imense profits for the corporations involved, as these are the key players in the whole "Terror" game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question???
Posted by: aumfish on Jun 20, 2006 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hasn't more investigative work been done on the bogus yellow-cake deal? Surely the document source could be tracked down --- Who would stand to benefit from such an allegation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]