Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Progressive Nation 1.0

By Jeffrey Feldman, Frameshop. Posted June 13, 2006.


America is getting busy rejecting the right-wing and the YearlyKos Convention was the first clear, successful manifestation of the alternative.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jeffrey Feldman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This past weekend's wildly successful YearlyKos Convention proved beyond a doubt that the Progressive Movement has dramatically changed the landscape of American media, politics and culture. As such, the Progressive Movement is now poised to revive an American future suffocated by the hostile takeover of the Radical Right.

But what is the foundation of this new movement? What is the core principle or core value driving events like YearlyKos--a core idea that speaks with such power to an ever-increasing cross-section of Americans?

The answer is: trust.

Trust at the core

With few exceptions, of the remarkable things about the media coverage of the YearlyKos Convention has been the inability of journalists to capture in writing the significance of the event for those who attended. They missed it.

Take a look at this clip from Maureen Dowd's op-ed Bloggers Double Down, for example, which is representative of the type of approach that journalists took to the event:

I tracked down the cult leader, wading through a sea of Kossacks, who were sitting on the floor in the hall with their laptops or at tables where they blogged, BlackBerried, texted and cellphoned -- sometimes contacting someone only a few feet away. They were paler and more earnest than your typical Vegas visitors, but the mood was like a masquerade. This was the first time many of the bloggers had met, and they delighted in discovering whether their online companions were, as one woman told me, male, female, black, white, old, young or "in a wheelchair."

Let me just say that I am a big fan of Maureen Dowd, maybe even a groupie. And I was more than a little chuffed to see her sitting at the table next to me when I attended the "pundit training" workshop she also mentioned in her article. But as I read Dowd's description of YearlyKos, I wondered how two people could be sitting just a few feet away from each other yet be so far apart.

Maureen Dowd's description of "the mood" being "like a masquerade" is not mean-spirited or hurtful or in anyway worthy of condemnation. It is just not an accurate description of the "mood" in the room.

The attendees at YearlyKos were not just happy to put names with faces, but were deeply moved to be for the first time standing in a new community built entirely on trust.

"To be here is to be a part of something that we have built," is not an exact quote, but is my synthesis of what I heard and what I was told by just about everyone at the YearlyKos convention. "We did this," is another.

During Harry Reid's evening address to the convention, and during Joe Wilson's remarks, and during Wes Clark's remarks, and during just about every event--formal or informal--in the entire conference, attendees were expressing the same thought, the same idea, over and over and over again: America is suffering from fear, and we have built a movement based on trust to make things better.

Why, I wonder, did this simple basic idea not appear in the established media coverage that was welcomed to YearlyKos and treated with such open respect and admiration throughout the weekend?

Journalists, it seems, are not quite ready or not quite able to write about the real story of our movement--which, at its core, is not about ice-sculptures at parties thrown by political candidates or about press training given to convention volunteers. The real story is how successful this movement has been having been built on a foundation and theme of trust.

Who we are and what we can expect

Having read that passage from a leading journalist who attended the YearlyKos Convention and attempted to describe what it was about, consider this quote from Gina Cooper, Executive Director of YearlyKos:

I said in my closing remarks Saturday evening that this convention was built on a foundation of trust. Markos set it out when he first created the structure of our community where we riff raff are trusted to create our own content and manage our own community. In return, the community trusted us by investing and showing up. And speaking of trust…now that Hyperbolic Pants Explosion's camera has been returned nothing at this convention was stolen. I mean, of course, we're not like that. But can you imagine any other event with over a thousand random people from anywhere and everywhere coming together and nothing being stolen? I mean, yes, that's how it should be, but we all know that how things "should" be and how they "are" are two totally different things. So a minor detail, yes. But once again an example of who we are and what we can expect even on the smallest of levels.

Digg!

Jeffrey Feldman is Editor-in-Chief of Frameshop.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Very Sensitive And Insightful!
Posted by: Steven Wanzell on Jun 13, 2006 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for this fine and inspiring article.

Steven Wanzell
artist/activist/ex-American
www.wanzellarts.com.ar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very inspiring but
Posted by: Rshaw on Jun 13, 2006 9:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
very inspiring but the bloggers need to take this net neutrality issue more seriously. This could end all these great things mentioned in this article, really fast.

The short video called The Death of The Internet? seems to be a great way to spread the awareness about this issue. Although it has gone out to an amazingly large audience it seems most of this has been the result of citizens forwarding it to each other. I have yet to see it on many the of the major blogs.

I'm amazed at the level of passivity on this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ALTERNET: Posted by: Steven Wanzell
TRUST
Posted by: wawa on Jun 14, 2006 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eye witness testimony from an honest source if trustworthy.

An honest Source spoke to WAWA and the UNCENSORED video that you will NOT see on CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, LINK, FOX, etc is FREE for those who seek the truth and come to WAWA.

We who Are Wide Awake have built it
Will you Come?


goggle "WAWA BLOG" and you will find us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jadelai
Posted by: alterme on Jun 14, 2006 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks so much for the inspiring article! I want so much to be a part of this next year! Blessings to All.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The utter bankruptcy of bourgeois "Progressive"politics
Posted by: jcrw on Jun 14, 2006 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reveals the completely bankrupt nature of bourgeois "feel good - do good" politics. This type of politics treats symptoms as causes. All we need to do is replace bad people with good people. Perhaps we should have more faith in god(s), more trust, get more people to vote for good people is all it takes! Rubbish!

A quick overview of what and why we are facing so many crisis that are unresolveable under our present political economy... and current "progressive" thinking about them.

1. U.S. Capitalism, for the last 30 years, has lost it's profitability in traditional areas. Manufacturing has moved to China, steel has moved to Korea, auto manufacture, clothing, etc. This loss of living-wage jobs.has meant an on-going decline of the standard of living for most working people.

2. The collapse of the Soviet Union 15 years ago, meant the U.S. was the military super-power of the world. The Project for the New American Century (Wolfowitz, Cheney,Rumsfeld, many others signed on to this),proposes to use this power to establish total US hegemony over the planet. Purpose: to re-gain the lost profitability and wealth by seizing the essential natural resources of the world, enforce favorable treaties (NAFTA,etc.), destroy any opposition to US hegemony.

3. The PNAC agenda is now US Foreign Policy. All branches of the federal government are now under their control. The Democratic Party is fully supportive of this agenda (large majority votes for military budgets, etc.). Even the labor movement considers itself a "business partner" to corporate capitalism, even as they are being destroyed by corporations going bankrupt. The PNAC organization is now closing because it's "Mission Accomplished" and is unnecessary.

4. The only "solution" is to end the capitalism that is dedicated to maximizing profit no matter what the consequences (unending wars for profit, oil, Global warming is exacerbated, millions dying from starvation and toxic water supply, etc.) Some form of socialist economics to the transform the economy to provide for human needs will ever begin to "solve" the problems.

Please go to http://www.wsws.org World Socialist Web Site, and sign up for their daily news analysis service. Read it for awhile and compare it with any other source of info, you might start to understand what is needed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]